Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 52 references

Switchable polarization in non-ferroelectric SrTiO$_3$

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A charge-compensated defect complex in $\mathrm{SrTiO}_3$ yields a spontaneous polarization of about $32\,\mu\mathrm{C}/\mathrm{cm}^2$, switchable between equivalent sites at $0.1$–$0.8$ eV barriers, making a non-ferroelectric perovskite…

desk verdict Solid DFT study of a specific defect complex in SrTiO3; the switchability claim rests on an untested all-aligned superlattice assumption, but the work is careful and deserves review. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.01433 v1 pith:GDKHUSIC submitted 2025-06-02 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Wahib Aggoune , Matthias Scheffler This is my paper
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords SrTiO3perovskitedefectengineeringpolarizationswitchingantisitevacancydensityfunctionaltheoryferroelectricity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that a specific intrinsic defect combination can give ordinary, non-ferroelectric $\mathrm{SrTiO}_3$ a spontaneous electric polarization that rivals classic ferroelectrics and can be switched by an external voltage. The combination is a titanium atom sitting on a strontium site (the $\mathrm{Ti_{Sr}}$ antisite) paired with a strontium vacancy, which compensates its charge. In density-functional calculations at 12.5% defect concentration, this complex produces about $32\,\mu\mathrm{C}/\mathrm{cm}^2$ along $[110]$, comparable to $\mathrm{BaTiO}_3$. Because perovskite symmetry makes several defect sites equivalent, the complex can hop between them with barriers between roughly $0.1$ and $0.8$ eV, reversing the polarization direction and moving localized electronic states in space. If correct, this would explain observed ferroelectric-like and resistive switching in off-stoichiometric $\mathrm{SrTiO}_3$ films and make defects a design knob for ferroelectricity.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the compensated $\mathrm{Ti_{Sr}+V_{Sr}}$ defect complex: a titanium atom occupying a strontium site (the $\mathrm{Ti_{Sr}}$ antisite, itself a $\mathrm{Ti_i+V_{Sr}}$ pair) plus an additional nearby strontium vacancy, so the donor-like antisite and acceptor-like vacancy cancel charges. The argument rides on three pieces: perovskite symmetry makes several equivalent sites for this complex; the polarization is computed with Berry-phase branches referenced to the antiferrodistortive $P1$ host so the defect contribution is isolated; and switching paths are built by linear interpolation with only the $\mathrm{Ti_{Sr}}$ position and one Sr atom fixed, approximating minimum-energy paths. The mechanism is that moving the titanium between equivalent sites reverses the dipole and shifts the localized Ti-$d$ mid-gap states in real space.

What would settle it

Compute the true minimum-energy path for TiSr movement between the equivalent A, B, C, and D sites with a method that relaxes the cell and all atomic coordinates (for example, climbing-image nudged elastic band with variable cell); if the barriers exceed about 1 eV or pass through a different intermediate structure, the claimed low-voltage switchability is not supported. Experimentally, measuring the polarization hysteresis and coercive field in Sr-deficient, Ti-rich SrTiO3 films and checking whether the switching voltage and polarization magnitude match the predicted 0.1–0.8 eV barriers and about 32 µC/cm2 would settle the claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that the charge-compensated defect complex formed by a $\mathrm{Ti_{Sr}}$ antisite and a nearby $\mathrm{V_{Sr}}$ vacancy ($\mathrm{Ti_{Sr}+V_{Sr}}$) is thermodynamically stable under Ti-rich, Sr-poor growth, pins the Fermi level inside the gap, preserves an insulating character, and induces a spontaneous polarization of about $32\,\mu\mathrm{C}/\mathrm{cm}^2$ along the Ti off-center $[110]$ direction. The paper isolates the defect contribution by tracing the polarization branch from a centrosymmetric reference through the antiferrodistortive $P1$ structure to the fully relaxed defect geometry. Symmetry-equivalent defect sites allow the titanium atom to move between positions labeled A, B, C, and D; computed barriers are about $0.1$ eV for the A-B path, $0.6$ eV for A-C in the neutral antisite, $0.8$ eV for A-C in the compensated complex, and similar for A-D migration. Switching changes both the polarization direction and the location of the defect's localized mid-gap states, which the paper connects to resistive-switching behavior.

Load-bearing premise

The switchability conclusion rests on the assumption that the linearly interpolated, constrained switching paths used for the barriers are close to the true lowest-energy paths; if the actual barriers are much higher, or an applied electric field triggers a different collective distortion, the polarization may not be switchable at low voltage.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Under Ti-rich, Sr-poor growth conditions, the $\mathrm{Ti_{Sr}+V_{Sr}}$ complex is thermodynamically stable and charge-neutral, so off-stoichiometric $\mathrm{SrTiO}_3$ films should be semi-insulating, matching the insulating character seen experimentally before switching.
  • Raising the Fermi level, for example by an applied voltage, converts the compensated complex into $(\mathrm{Ti_{Sr}+V_{Sr}})^{-2}$, which localizes two electrons in Ti-$d$ mid-gap states with a magnetic moment of $2\,\mu_B$.
  • Switching the defect between equivalent sites reverses the polarization direction and shifts the defect states in real space, coupling ferroelectric switching to electronic conductivity and providing a microscopic route to resistive switching.
  • Because the A-B barrier is about $0.1$ eV, part of the polarization can be reoriented with small voltages, while the A-C and A-D barriers near $0.6$–$0.8$ eV offer additional switching channels with different energy costs.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper demonstrates the compensation mechanism only in $\mathrm{SrTiO}_3$; if the same donor-antisite/acceptor-vacancy picture holds in other non-ferroelectric perovskites, defect engineering could become a general route to switchable polarization. That generality is an inference, not a result of this paper.
  • Because the A-D path moves the titanium into a neighboring pseudocube, repeated switching resembles local defect diffusion; long-term cycling could drive ionic motion or fatigue, a testable consequence not addressed here.
  • The computed polarization at 12.5% defect concentration gives an upper bound for realistic films with lower average defect density; concentration-dependent calculations or experiments would show how the effect scales down.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript uses hybrid density-functional theory (HSE06, alpha = 20% for defects) to study intrinsic point defects in SrTiO3, concentrating on the TiSr antisite and the TiSr+VSr defect complex. It reports that the compensated complex binds weakly (-0.15 eV), pins the Fermi level, and at a 12.5% concentration in a 2x2x2 supercell induces a Berry-phase polarization of about 32 microC/cm2 along [110], comparable to BaTiO3. Switching the TiSr between symmetry-equivalent sites is claimed to reverse or modulate the polarization with energy barriers between about 0.1 and 0.8 eV, and in the charged complex to also shift the spatial distribution of mid-gap defect states. The work is motivated by experimental reports of polarization and resistive switching in off-stoichiometric SrTiO3 films.

Significance. If the central claim survives scrutiny, the work identifies a concrete microscopic mechanism by which intrinsic defect complexes alone can turn a non-ferroelectric perovskite into a system with switchable polarization, with direct relevance to recent experiments on off-stoichiometric SrTiO3 films. The computational setup is unusually careful: all-electron HSE06 calculations with spin polarization, large 320-atom supercells for isolated defects, PBEsol cross-checks, and a detailed Berry-phase branch analysis to extract the defect-induced polarization. The deposition of input/output files in the NOMAD repository is a clear strength. The main weaknesses are that the macroscopic polarization and switching scenario are established only for a periodic, all-aligned defect arrangement, and the switching barriers rest on an approximate constrained-interpolation path.

major comments (2)
  1. [Electronic properties of high-defects concentration / Polarization and switching barriers] The central claim of a net spontaneous polarization of about 32 microC/cm2 and of switchability is computed in a 2x2x2 supercell with one TiSr+VSr complex per cell, all complexes aligned with the same polarization direction. The manuscript does not test alternative arrangements (antipolar, staggered, or phase-separated) or estimate inter-complex interactions. In fact, the isolated complex binding energy is only about -0.15 eV (Section 'Point defects characteristics'), so elastic and dipole-dipole interactions at 12.5% concentration could in principle stabilize a different ordering that partially or fully cancels the macroscopic polarization. Without such tests, the extrapolation from a periodic all-aligned superlattice to the experimentally relevant disordered samples is not established. A definitive test would be a larger supercell containing two or more complexes in different relative orientations, comparing the energies of aligned versus anti-aligned configurations.
  2. [Method / Polarization and switching barriers] The switching energy barriers are obtained from a constrained linear interpolation path in which only the TiSr and one Sr atom are fixed, with all other coordinates and lattice parameters relaxed. This is not a true minimum-energy path (no NEB or string method is used). The resulting barriers of 0.1-0.8 eV are thus not guaranteed to be close to the physical saddle points. The claim that switching 'can be achieved by applying low electric voltage' (Section 'Polarization and switching barriers') relies on these approximate barriers. I ask the authors to test at least one of the reported pathways (e.g., A-B in the compensated complex) with a proper solid-state NEB calculation, or to estimate the error of the constrained interpolation by comparing to a chain-of-states method for a smaller cell.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Introduction] The abbreviations 'P S' and 'RS' are used without full expansion at first use; please define them explicitly (e.g., 'polarization switching' and 'resistive switching').
  2. [Table I] The column header 'P µC/cm2' should be formatted as 'P (µC/cm2)' for clarity, and the same units should appear in the text when the 32 microC/cm2 value is quoted.
  3. [Method] The phrase 'This allows to approach the lowest energy path' is ungrammatical; it should read 'This allows one to approach the lowest-energy path.'
  4. [Polarization and switching barriers] The argument that the A-B path is a 'sway/oscillation' while the A-C path requires breaking more bonds would be much easier to follow with a figure showing the oxygen coordination and the TiSr-anchoring Sr atom along the two paths; currently only the defect sites are sketched in Fig. 4a.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: polarization and switching barriers are independent DFT predictions, not fits to the target result.

full rationale

The central claims—that the compensated TiSr+VSr complex induces about 32 µC/cm2 polarization and that switching between symmetry-equivalent sites faces energy barriers of roughly 0.1–0.8 eV—are direct outputs of first-principles calculations. The polarization is obtained with the Berry-phase approach and referenced to the pristine AFD P1 structure; the barriers are obtained from constrained relaxations along linearly interpolated switching paths. The only tuned input is the HSE(20) exchange-mixing parameter α=20%, which the paper explicitly states is tuned to set the band gap within the experimental range, not to reproduce the polarization or barrier heights. The defect complex itself is selected from formation-energy thermodynamics, not from the target polarization. The single authorship-overlapping citation, Ref. [48], is used only as a benchmark value for BaTiO3 (about 29 µC/cm2) and is not load-bearing for the paper's own derivation. The possible objection that the 2×2×2 homogeneous-defect superlattice may not be the equilibrium arrangement (e.g., anti-aligned or phase-separated complexes could cancel polarization) is a physical robustness concern, not a circularity, because the calculation does not assume the answer. No equation reduces to its own input by construction, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. Therefore the paper shows no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the accuracy of HSE06(20) for defect energetics and polarization, on the adequacy of the chosen supercells, on the use of the P1 AFD phase as the polarization reference, and on the interpolated path for switching barriers. No new physical entities are introduced; the TiSr+VSr complex is a combination of known defects.

free parameters (1)
  • HSE06 exact-exchange mixing parameter alpha = 20% for defect supercells, 25% for pristine unit cells
    The 20% value is explicitly chosen to place the computed band gap in the experimental range (Method: 'tuned to set the band gap within the range of the experimental values'). It affects defect transition levels and the electronic structure used to interpret the defects, though it is not fitted to the polarization or switching barriers.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption DFT with the HSE06 hybrid functional accurately describes total energies, forces, band gaps, and polarizations for SrTiO3 and its defects.
    The entire defect stability, polarization, and barrier analysis rests on the accuracy of this functional approximation; the paper validates it against experimental band gaps and lattice parameters for pristine phases, but not against direct experimental defect polarization data.
  • domain assumption Finite periodic supercells (320-atom and 40-atom) with homogeneous defect distributions represent the dilute and high-concentration limits.
    The paper cites ref. 16 for convergence of the 320-atom cell and tests k-grid convergence, but the 40-atom 12.5% concentration cell is taken as representative of the experimental off-stoichiometry without a systematic concentration study.
  • domain assumption The low-temperature P1 AFD phase is an appropriate reference for understanding room-temperature defect-induced polarization and switching.
    The authors justify this by noting that polarization switching and resistive switching are also observed at low temperatures, but the title claims 'non-ferroelectric SrTiO3' while the P1 reference itself has a spontaneous polarization of 22 µC/cm2.
  • standard math Berry-phase polarization along a linearly interpolated path from the centrosymmetric to the relaxed defect structure gives the correct polarization branch.
    This is the standard modern theory of polarization; the paper carefully handles branch crossings in the SI, but the interpolation itself is an approximation to the adiabatic path.
  • ad hoc to paper Linear interpolation with one constrained TiSr-Sr distance approximates the minimum energy path for defect switching.
    The authors do not use Nudged Elastic Band because lattice parameters change; they instead fix one distance and relax everything else. This is an ad hoc approximation that may miss the true saddle point and collective rearrangements.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Switchable polarization in non-ferroelectric SrTiO$_3$." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/GDKHUSIC

@misc{pith2026250601433,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Switchable polarization in non-ferroelectric SrTiO$_3$},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/GDKHUSIC}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.01433}
}
abstract

Perovskites with tunable and switchable polarization hold immense promise for unlocking novel functionalities. Using density-functional theory, we reveal that intrinsic defects can induce, enhance, and control polarization in non-ferroelectric perovskites, with SrTiO$_3$ as our model system. At high defect concentrations, these systems exhibit strong spontaneous polarization - comparable to that of conventional ferroelectrics. Crucially, this polarization is switchable, enabled by the inherent symmetry-equivalence of defect sites in SrTiO$_3$. Strikingly, polarization switching not only reverses the polarization direction and modulates its magnitude but also modifies the spatial distribution of localized defect states. This dynamic behavior points to unprecedented responses to external stimuli, opening new avenues for defect-engineered materials design.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.01433 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (a) Top view of the cubic and the anti-ferrodistortive [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. (a) Stability energy diagram of bulk STO in the cubic phase as a function of the chemical potential of titanium and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Electronic band structure of (a) pristine STO in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a) Sketch of the neutral Ti [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

52 extracted references · 48 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Switchable polarization in non-ferroelectric SrTiO$_3$

    SrTiO3 thin films grown under Ti-rich and Sr-poor conditions. This material is one of the most studied ox- ide perovskites to develop original ideas/concepts due to its various, fascinating physical properties [12]. For the above purpose, its stable cubic phase at room temper- ature eases to study and disentangle the role of defects and interfacial strain...

    work page Pith review arXiv 2025

  2. [2]

    Mater.19, 129 (2020)

    A century of ferroelectricity, Nat. Mater.19, 129 (2020)

    work page 2020

  3. [3]

    X. Chai, J. Jiang, Q. Zhang, X. Hou, F. Meng, J. Wang, L. Gu, D. W. Zhang, and A. Q. Jiang, Nonvolatile fer- roelectric field-effect transistors, Nat. Commun.11, 2811 (2020)

    work page 2020

  4. [4]

    T. Wu, W. Pisula, M. Y. A. Rashid, and P. Gao, Ap- plication of perovskite-structured materials in field-effect transistors, Adv. Electron. Mater.5, 1900444 (2019)

    work page 2019

  5. [5]

    S. Choo, S. Varshney, H. Liu, S. Sharma, R. D. James, and B. Jalan, From oxide epitaxy to freestanding mem- branes: Opportunities and challenges, Sci. Adv. 10, eadq8561 (2024)

    work page 2024

  6. [6]

    W. Dong, H. Xiao, Y. Jia, L. Chen, H. Geng, S. U. H. Bakhtiar, Q. Fu, and Y. Guo, Engineering the defects and microstructures in ferroelectrics for enhanced/novel properties: An emerging way to cope with energy crisis andenvironmentalpollution,Adv.Sci. 9,2105368(2022)

    work page 2022

  7. [7]

    M. Choi, F. Oba, and I. Tanaka, Role of Ti Antisitelike defects in SrTiO3, Phys. Rev. Lett.103, 185502 (2009)

    work page 2009

  8. [8]

    D. Lee, H. Lu, Y. Gu, S.-Y. Choi, S.-D. Li, S. Ryu, T. R. Paudel, K. Song, E. Mikheev, S. Lee, S. Stem- mer, D. A. Tenne, S. H. Oh, E. Y. Tsymbal, X. Wu, L.-Q. Chen, A. Gruverman, and C. B. Eom, Emergence of room-temperature ferroelectricity at reduced dimen- sions, Science 349, 1314 (2015)

    work page 2015

Show all 52 references
  1. [9]

    Klyukin and V

    K. Klyukin and V. Alexandrov, Effect of intrinsic point defects on ferroelectric polarization behavior of SrTiO3, Phys. Rev. B95, 035301 (2017)

    2017

  2. [10]

    F. Yang, Q. Zhang, Z. Yang, J. Gu, Y. Liang, W. Li, W. Wang, K. Jin, L. Gu, and J. Guo, Room-temperature ferroelectricity of SrTiO3 films modulated by cation con- centration, Appl. Phys. Lett.107, 082904 (2015)

    2015

  3. [11]

    Mikheev, J

    E. Mikheev, J. Hwang, A. P. Kajdos, A. J. Hauser, and S. Stemmer, Tailoring resistive switching in Pt/SrTiO3 junctions by stoichiometry control, Sci. Rep. 5, 11079 (2015)

    2015

  4. [12]

    A. Baki, J. Stöver, T. Schulz, T. Markurt, H. Amari, C. Richter, J. Martin, K. Irmscher, M. Albrecht, and J. Schwarzkopf, Influence of Sr deficiency on structural and electrical properties of SrTiO3 thin films grown by metal–organic vapor phase epitaxy, Sci. Rep. 11, 7497 (2021)

    2021

  5. [13]

    Y.-Y. Pai, A. Tylan-Tyler, P. Irvin, and J. Levy, Physics of SrTiO3-based heterostructures and nanostructures: a review, Rep. Prog. Phys81, 036503 (2018)

    2018

  6. [14]

    B. Liu, V. R. Cooper, H. Xu, H. Xiao, Y. Zhang, and W. J. Weber, Composition dependent intrinsic defect structures in SrTiO 3, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 16, 15590 (2014)

    2014

  7. [15]

    D. Lee, H. Wang, B. A. Noesges, T. J. Asel, J. Pan, J.-W. Lee, Q. Yan, L. J. Brillson, X. Wu, and C.-B. Eom, Iden- tification of a functional point defect in SrTiO3, Phys. Rev. Mater. 2, 060403 (2018)

    2018

  8. [16]

    Janotti, J

    A. Janotti, J. B. Varley, M. Choi, and C. G. Van de Walle, Vacancies and small polarons in SrTiO3, Phys. Rev. B 90, 085202 (2014). 11

    2014

  9. [17]

    Ricca, I

    C. Ricca, I. Timrov, M. Cococcioni, N. Marzari, and U. Aschauer, Self-consistent DFT+U+V study of oxygen vacancies in SrTiO3, Phys. Rev. Res.2, 023313 (2020)

    2020

  10. [18]

    V. Blum, R. Gehrke, F. Hanke, P. Havu, V. Havu, X. Ren, K. Reuter, and M. Scheffler, Ab initio molecular simulations with numeric atom-centered orbitals, Com- put. Phys. Commun.180, 2175 (2009)

    2009

  11. [19]

    Kokott, F

    S. Kokott, F. Merz, Y. Yao, C. Carbogno, M. Rossi, V. Havu, M. Rampp, M. Scheffler, and V. Blum, Effi- cient all-electron hybrid density functionals for atomistic simulations beyond 10 000 atoms, J. Chem. Phys.161, 024112 (2024)

    2024

  12. [20]

    A. V. Krukau, O. A. Vydrov, A. F. Izmaylov, and G. E. Scuseria, Influence of the exchange screening parame- ter on the performance of screened hybrid functionals, J. Chem. Phys.125, 224106 (2006)

    2006

  13. [21]

    J. P. Perdew, A. Ruzsinszky, G. I. Csonka, O. A. Vydrov, G. E. Scuseria, L. A. Constantin, X. Zhou, and K. Burke, Restoring the density-gradient expansion for exchange in solids and surfaces, Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 136406 (2008)

    2008

  14. [22]

    Henkelman and H

    G. Henkelman and H. Jónsson, Improved tangent esti- mate in the nudged elastic band method for finding min- imum energy paths and saddle points, J. Chem. Phys. 113, 9978 (2000)

    2000

  15. [23]

    R. D. King-Smith and D. Vanderbilt, Theory of polariza- tion of crystalline solids, Phys. Rev. B47, 1651 (1993)

    1993

  16. [24]

    M. E. Turiansky, A. Alkauskas, M. Engel, G. Kresse, D. Wickramaratne, J.-X. Shen, C. E. Dreyer, and C. G. Van de Walle, Nonrad: Computing nonradiative capture coefficients from first principles, Comput. Phys. Com- mun. 267, 108056 (2021)

    2021

  17. [25]

    K. A. Müller and H. Burkard, SrTiO3: An intrinsic quan- tum paraelectric below 4 k, Phys. Rev. B19, 3593 (1979)

    1979

  18. [26]

    Momma and F

    K. Momma and F. Izumi,VESTA3for three-dimensional visualization of crystal, volumetric and morphology data, J. Appl. Crystallogr.44, 1272 (2011)

    2011

  19. [27]

    L. Cao, E. Sozontov, and J. Zegenhagen, Cubic to tetrag- onal phase transition of SrTiO3 under epitaxial stress: An X-ray backscattering study, Phys. Status Solidi A 181, 387 (2000)

    2000

  20. [28]

    Unoki and T

    H. Unoki and T. Sakudo, Electron spin resonance of Fe3+ in SrTiO3 with special reference to the 110◦k phase tran- sition, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.23, 546 (1967)

    1967

  21. [29]

    P. A. Fleury, J. F. Scott, and J. M. Worlock, Soft phonon modes and the 110◦K phase transition in SrTiO3, Phys. Rev. Lett. 21, 16 (1968)

    1968

  22. [30]

    A. M. Glazer, The classification of tilted octahedra in perovskites, Acta Crystallogr. B28, 3384 (1972)

    1972

  23. [31]

    Y. L. Li, S. Choudhury, J. H. Haeni, M. D. Biegal- ski, A. Vasudevarao, A. Sharan, H. Z. Ma, J. Levy, V. Gopalan, S. Trolier-McKinstry, D. G. Schlom, Q. X. Jia, and L. Q. Chen, Phase transitions and domain struc- tures in strained pseudocubic (100) SrTiO3 thin films, Phys. Rev...

    2006

  24. [32]

    Cowley, W

    R. Cowley, W. Buyers, and G. Dolling, Relationship of normal modes of vibration of strontium titanate and its antiferroelectric phase transition at 110◦K, Solid State Commun. 7, 181 (1969)

    1969

  25. [33]

    Yamada and G

    Y. Yamada and G. Shirane, Neutron scattering and na- ture of the soft optical phonon in SrTiO3, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 26, 396 (1969)

    1969

  26. [34]

    J. F. Scott, Soft-mode spectroscopy: Experimental stud- ies of structural phase transitions, Rev. Mod. Phys.46, 83 (1974)

    1974

  27. [35]

    Bieger, J

    T. Bieger, J. Maier, and R. Waser, Optical investigation of oxygen incorporation in SrTiO3, Solid State Ionics53- 56, 578 (1992)

    1992

  28. [36]

    D. J. Kok, K. Irmscher, M. Naumann, C. Guguschev, Z. Galazka, and R. Uecker, Temperature-dependent op- tical absorption of SrTiO3, Phys. Status Solidi A 212, 1880 (2015)

    2015

  29. [37]

    van Benthem, C

    K. van Benthem, C. Elsässer, and R. H. French, Bulk electronic structure of SrTiO3: Experiment and theory, J. Appl. Phys.90, 6156 (2001)

    2001

  30. [38]

    P. K. Gogoi and D. Schmidt, Temperature-dependent di- electricfunctionofbulkSrTiO 3: Urbachtail, bandedges, and excitonic effects, Phys. Rev. B93, 075204 (2016)

    2016

  31. [39]

    Varrassi, P

    L. Varrassi, P. Liu, Z. E. Yavas, M. Bokdam, G. Kresse, and C. Franchini, Optical and excitonic properties of transition metal oxide perovskites by the bethe-salpeter equation, Phys. Rev. Mater.5, 074601 (2021)

    2021

  32. [40]

    R. Wahl, D. Vogtenhuber, and G. Kresse, SrTiO3 and BaTiO3 revisited using the projector augmented wave method: Performance of hybrid and semilocal function- als, Phys. Rev. B78, 104116 (2008)

    2008

  33. [41]

    El-Mellouhi, E

    F. El-Mellouhi, E. N. Brothers, M. J. Lucero, and G. E. Scuseria, Modeling of the cubic and antiferrodistortive phases of SrTiO3 with screened hybrid density functional theory, Phys. Rev. B84, 115122 (2011)

    2011

  34. [42]

    Rosendal, W

    V. Rosendal, W. H. Brito, M. Radovic, A. Chikina, M. Brandbyge, N. Pryds, and D. H. Petersen, Octahe- dral distortions in SrNbO3: Unraveling the structure- property relation, Phys. Rev. Mater.7, 075002 (2023)

    2023

  35. [43]

    Aschauer and N

    U. Aschauer and N. A. Spaldin, Competition and coop- eration between antiferrodistortive and ferroelectric in- stabilities in the model perovskite SrTiO3, J. Phys. Con- dens. Matter 26, 122203 (2014)

    2014

  36. [44]

    Watanabe, Accurate semiempirical analytical formu- las for spontaneous polarization by crystallographic pa- rameters of SrTiO3-BaTiO3 system by ab initio calcula- tions, Comput

    Y. Watanabe, Accurate semiempirical analytical formu- las for spontaneous polarization by crystallographic pa- rameters of SrTiO3-BaTiO3 system by ab initio calcula- tions, Comput. Mater. Sci.158, 315 (2019)

    2019

  37. [45]

    Tkatchenko and M

    A. Tkatchenko and M. Scheffler, Accurate molecular van der waals interactions from ground-state electron den- sity and free-atom reference data, Phys. Rev. Lett.102, 073005 (2009)

    2009

  38. [46]

    Tkatchenko, R

    A. Tkatchenko, R. A. DiStasio, R. Car, and M. Scheffler, Accurate and efficient method for many-body van der waals interactions, Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 236402 (2012)

    2012

  39. [47]

    Karjalainen, V

    A. Karjalainen, V. Prozheeva, I. Makkonen, C. Gu- guschev, T. Markurt, M. Bickermann, and F. Tuomisto, Tisr antisite: An abundant point defect in SrTiO3, J. Appl. Phys. 127, 245702 (2020)

    2020

  40. [48]

    B. A. Noesges, D. Lee, J.-W. Lee, C.-B. Eom, and L. J. Brillson, Nanoscale interplay of native point defects near Sr-deficient SrxTiO3/SrTiO3 interfaces, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A40, 043201 (2022)

    2022

  41. [49]

    L. Fang, W. Aggoune, W. Ren, and C. Draxl, How a fer- roelectric layer can tune a two-dimensional electron gas at the interface of LaInO3 and BaSnO3: A first-principles study, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces15, 11314 (2023)

    2023

  42. [50]

    Aggoune and C

    W. Aggoune and C. Draxl, Tuning two-dimensional elec- tron and hole gases at LaInO3/BaSnO3 interfaces by po- lar distortions, termination, and thickness, npj Comput. Mater. 7, 174 (2021)

    2021

  43. [51]

    Switchable polarization in non-ferroelectric SrTiO 3

    C. Draxl and M. Scheffler, The nomad laboratory: from data sharing to artificial intelligence, JPhys mater. 2, 036001 (2019). S12 Supporting Information: "Switchable polarization in non-ferroelectric SrTiO 3" Wahib Aggoune1,2 and Matthias Scheffler1 1The NOMAD Laboratory at Fr...

    2019

  44. [52]

    For example, the geometries optimized with PBEsol including/ignoring spin polarization are al- most similar [Fig

    direction. For example, the geometries optimized with PBEsol including/ignoring spin polarization are al- most similar [Fig. S1a,c]. However, comparing the spin- polarized structures given by PBEsol and HSE(20) [Fig. S1c,d], one can see, with careful inspection, that the ge- o...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.