Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 2 minor 1 cited by

Six-dimensional $\mathcal{N}=(2,0)$ Conformal Superspace

T0 review · 2 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Gauging OSp(6,2|4) in superspace yields a complete off-shell geometry for 6D N=(2,0) conformal supergravity, with a single super-Weyl tensor fixing all curvatures and a unique Bach tensor superfield giving the equations of motion.

desk verdict The last missing 6D conformal superspace is here, and the authors are honest about the cost: the completeness and uniqueness claims outrun the Bianchi identities they actually verified. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.01630 v2 pith:XAXTIEZV submitted 2025-06-02 hep-th math-phmath.MP

Christian Kennedy , Gabriele Tartaglino-Mazzucchelli This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-thmath-phmath.MP MSC 83E5081T60 PACS 04.65.+e11.30.Pb
keywords six-dimensional(20)supergravityconformalsuperspacesuperconformalalgebraOSp(62|4)super-WeyltensorBachsuperfieldoff-shellWeylmultipletBianchiidentities
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper builds the off-shell conformal superspace for maximal six-dimensional supergravity: it gauges the full $6D$ $N=(2,0)$ superconformal algebra $OSp(6,2|4)$ on a supermanifold with sixteen fermionic directions, and claims that the entire geometry — curvatures, torsions, and structure functions — is determined by a single primary superfield, the super-Weyl tensor $W_{abc}^{ij}$, together with its descendants. If the construction is correct, it supplies the missing covariant framework for $N=(2,0)$ conformal supergravity and pins down the unique Bach tensor superfield, which is the multiplet of equations of motion of the theory. The paper also establishes an unusual rigidity: among all covariant derivatives only the translation operator $\nabla_a$ admits a deformation, controlled by one real parameter. The result matters as the natural geometric starting point for constructing the unique $N=(2,0)$ conformal supergravity action and for computing conformal anomalies in six dimensions.

What carries the argument

The central object is the super-Weyl tensor $W_{abc}^{ij}$, a dimension-one superconformal primary that is an anti-self-dual 3-form in its six-dimensional Lorentz indices and a USp(4)-traceless antisymmetric pair in its R-symmetry indices; written with spinor indices it becomes the symmetric traceless $W_{\alpha\beta}^{ij}$. The construction is carried by the representation theory of $SL(4,\mathbb{C})\times Sp(4,\mathbb{C})$ used with Schur's lemma: every curvature, torsion, and structure function is built as an ansatz from $W_{\alpha\beta}^{ij}$ and its descendants, and the Bianchi identities fix the coefficients. The single most load-bearing equation is the dimension-$\frac{3}{2}$ constraint (3.66), $\nabla^i_\alpha W^{\beta\gamma jk} = \frac{1}{5}\Omega^{jk}X_\alpha{}^{\beta\gamma i} + \frac{4}{5}\Omega^{i[j}X_\alpha{}^{\beta\gamma k]} + \frac{2}{5}\delta^{(\beta}_\alpha X^{\gamma)i,jk}$, from which the remaining supersymmetry transformations are claimed to follow by iteration. For the Bach tensor, the machinery is a seven-parameter ansatz (6.2) fixed by the primary condition $S^\alpha_p B_{ij,kl}=0$ and by truncation to the $N=(1,0)$ Bach tensor, yielding the coefficients $b_2=-b_1/80$, $b_3=4b_1/15$, $b_4=5b_1/144$, $b_5=-b_6=5b_1/3$, $b_7=0$.

What would settle it

Evaluate the dimension-$\frac{5}{2}$ and dimension-3 Bianchi identities $[\nabla_A,[\nabla_B,\nabla_C]]$ plus graded permutations with the explicit curvatures, torsions, and structure functions of Eqs. (2.48)–(2.62) and the supersymmetry transformations of (2.55)–(2.56); any non-vanishing component would disprove the completeness claim. Independently, compute the full traceless irrep of $S^\alpha_p B_{ij,kl}$ on the ansatz (6.2) with the fixed coefficients and test the conservation equation (6.1); a nonzero result would show the Bach tensor is not superconformal primary or conserved as claimed.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper claims that the $6D$ $N=(2,0)$ standard Weyl multiplet possesses a complete off-shell conformal superspace description: gauging $OSp(6,2|4)$ and imposing conventional constraints produces a geometry in which every curvature, torsion, and structure function is expressed through the dimension-one primary super-Weyl tensor $W_{abc}^{ij}$ and its descendants, with the anticommutator of two spinor covariant derivatives fixed as $\{\nabla^i_\alpha,\nabla^j_\beta\} = -2i\Omega^{ij}\nabla_{\alpha\beta} - W_{\alpha\beta}^{ij} - G_{\alpha\beta}^{ij}$, Eqs. (2.48)–(2.62). On this geometry the paper derives the unique Bach tensor superfield $B_{ij,kl}$, Eq. (6.2), which describes the multiplet of equations of motion of $N=(2,0)$ conformal supergravity. The superconformal primary condition fixes six of the seven real coefficients in the general ansatz, and truncation to the $N=(1,0)$ case fixes the seventh, so the Bach tensor is unique up to overall scaling with $b_2=-b_1/80$, $b_3=4b_1/15$, $b_4=5b_1/144$, $b_5=-b_6=5b_1/3$, and $b_7=0$.

Load-bearing premise

The central claim collapses if the two lowest Bianchi identities do not force the remaining dimension-$\frac{5}{2}$ and dimension-3 Bianchi identities, an implication the authors state they have not yet proven; the Bach-tensor uniqueness separately leans on the $N=(1,0)$ truncation, rather than a completed $N=(2,0)$ primary and conservation check, to fix its last coefficient.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • 6D N=(2,0) conformal supergravity now has a complete off-shell covariant formulation in which superconformal symmetry is part of the geometry itself, rather than an external tensor-calculus structure.
  • The whole standard Weyl multiplet — vielbein, gravitini, R-symmetry and dilatation connections, and the matter fields of dimensions 1, 3/2, and 2 — arises from a single primary superfield and its descendants.
  • The gauged algebra is essentially rigid: only the translation covariant derivative admits a deformation, governed by one real parameter, which fixes the conventional constraints and supersymmetry transformations nearly uniquely.
  • There is a unique (up to overall scaling) Bach tensor superfield describing the equations of motion of N=(2,0) conformal supergravity, consistent with there being a single independent (2,0) conformal supergravity action.
  • The component reduction and the N=(1,0) truncation reproduce the established component results of the 6D (1,0) and (2,0) conformal supergravity literature, providing cross-checks of the new superspace.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the Bianchi-completeness conjecture survives a direct check, the natural next application is the cohomological superform construction of the full N=(2,0) conformal supergravity action, whose compact building block this paper supplies; the rigidity of the gauged algebra suggests that action will be far more constrained than the thousands of terms appearing in the N=(1,0) invariants.
  • A reader wanting certainty on the completeness claim can compute the dimension-5/2 and dimension-3 Bianchi identities directly from the explicit curvatures (2.48)–(2.62), a check the authors state they have not performed; a similar direct evaluation of the full primary condition S^\alpha_p B_{ij,kl} = 0 would test the Bach uniqueness independently of the (1,0) truncation.
  • The one-parameter deformation of the translation covariant derivative echoes the traceless-frame choice in the N=(1,0) component literature, so a fixed-frame component presentation of the full (2,0) Weyl multiplet should be reachable by the same deformation techniques and would make the superspace more directly usable for holographic precision tests.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper constructs a conformal superspace for six-dimensional N=(2,0) supergravity by gauging the OSp(6,2|4) superconformal algebra. The authors propose a complete gauged algebra in which all curvatures, torsions, and structure functions are expressed in terms of a super-Weyl tensor W_abc^ij and its descendants (Eqs. (2.48)-(2.62)), derive the associated component reduction and compare it with the earlier component results of [15], work out a truncation to N=(1,0) superspace matching [24,69], and finally propose a unique N=(2,0) Bach tensor superfield with coefficients b2=-b1/80, b3=4b1/15, b4=5b1/144, b5=-b6=5b1/3, b7=0 (Eqs. (6.3)-(6.4)). The construction is developed from first principles using representation-theoretic ansatze, and the dimension-3/2 Bianchi identities are solved.

Significance. If correct, this work fills a notable gap in the conformal superspace program: it provides the first explicit off-shell conformal superspace geometry for 6D N=(2,0) conformal supergravity and identifies the associated multiplet of equations of motion. The paper is technically detailed, uses sound representation-theoretic methods, and provides nontrivial consistency checks: the component reduction matches [15], the truncation to N=(1,0) matches [24,69], and the partial Bianchi analysis and Bach-tensor constraints are internally consistent. The claimed uniqueness of the Bach tensor, if established fully, would sharpen earlier indirect analyses of 6D conformal supergravity invariants. However, the headline claims of a complete gauged algebra and a fully determined Bach tensor are conditional on unverified higher Bianchi identities and an incomplete check of the superconformal primary condition.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section 3.3] The claim of a complete gauged algebra rests on the unproved implication that the two lowest Bianchi identities, (3.65a) and (3.65b), imply the remaining dimension-5/2 and dimension-3 identities. Section 3.3 states explicitly that the authors have 'no rigorous proof of this yet' and have not checked the higher identities. The accompanying 'no freedom left' argument is not a consistency proof: if a higher identity failed, the listed equations (2.48)-(2.62) would contain an error, not automatically become consistent. This gap is load-bearing because the same full algebra is used for the component reduction of Section 4, the N=(1,0) truncation of Section 5, and the Bach-tensor ansatz of Section 6. The manuscript should either prove the implication or explicitly verify the remaining Bianchi identities before asserting the algebra is complete.
  2. [Section 6.1] The uniqueness of the N=(2,0) Bach tensor is not fully established at the N=(2,0) level. As stated in Section 6.1, only the Sp(4,C)-trace S^alpha_i B_{ij,kl}=0 and K_a B_{ij,kl}=0 were verified; the full primary condition S^alpha_p B_{ij,kl}=0 and the conservation equation (6.1) were not checked. The final coefficient b7=0 is fixed by truncation to N=(1,0) and the [24,69] upliftability statement rather than by a fully verified N=(2,0) condition. If the untraced primary condition or the conservation equation imposes additional constraints, the ansatz (6.2) and the resulting uniqueness claim would need to be modified. The paper should either verify these conditions or explicitly state the result as conditional on them.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and Section 2.3] The abstract and Section 2.3 state that the gauged algebra is 'complete' without qualification, but Section 3.3 acknowledges that a key Bianchi-identity implication is unproved. Please qualify the completeness claim to avoid overstating the verified results.
  2. [Equations (2.55d) and (3.63a)] The notation 'li1' in these equations is ambiguous and appears to be a typo for a subscript i1 (or l i1). Please clarify the index structure.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No circular reduction found; the superspace and Bach-tensor derivations are self-contained up to externally benchmarked N=(1,0) truncation, though the completeness claim is conditional on unverified Bianchi identities and the full primary condition.

full rationale

The central derivation does not assume its own conclusion. The 6D N=(2,0) conformal superspace is obtained by gauging OSp(6,2|4), imposing the superconformal algebra structure, and solving Jacobi/Bianchi constraints on a single primary super-Weyl superfield W; the descendant Q- and S-actions are solved from these constraints rather than inserted as the answer. The Bach-tensor analysis is likewise internally constrained: five of the seven coefficients in the ansatz (6.2) are fixed by the N=(2,0) conditions S^alpha_i B_{ij,kl}=0 and K_a B_{ij,kl}=0, giving (6.3). The remaining coefficient b7 is fixed by truncating to 6D N=(1,0) and comparing with the published results of [24,69]; this is external benchmarking, not self-derivation. The citation to [69] does involve an overlapping author, but [69] is an independent peer-reviewed component analysis and its result is not derived from the present paper, so the self-citation is not circularly load-bearing. The paper explicitly flags two load-bearing gaps: Section 3.3 states that the authors have 'no rigorous proof' that the two lowest Bianchi identities imply the dimension-5/2 and dimension-3 identities, and Section 6.1 states that the full traceless primary condition and the conservation equation (6.1) were not verified. These are completeness and correctness risks, not circular reductions of the derivation to its inputs. The score of 2 reflects the acknowledged self-citation and the conditional nature of the completeness claim, without treating either as a circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central construction rests on standard superconformal algebra and representation theory (axioms 1-3), on two explicitly unproved structural inputs (the Bianchi implication and the external N=(1,0) uniqueness statement, axioms 4-5), and on the standard supercurrent conservation equation (axiom 6). The only undetermined numeric freedom is the overall scale of the Bach tensor. No new particles, forces, or dimensions are introduced: W_abc^ij is the superspace avatar of the known component field T_abc^ij. The paper is transparent about the unproved items, but they are load-bearing for the words complete and unique.

free parameters (1)
  • Overall scaling b1 of the N=(2,0) Bach tensor = undetermined overall normalization
    The constraints fix b2 through b6 relative to b1 and force b7=0; only an irrelevant real overall scale remains. This is not a parameter fitted to data.
assumptions (6)
  • standard math The OSp(6,2|4) commutation relations and reality conditions in Eqs. (2.1)-(2.2) are the correct 6D N=(2,0) superconformal algebra.
    Taken from prior literature [24,66]; the entire gauging procedure starts from this algebra.
  • domain assumption The standard Weyl multiplet of 6D N=(2,0) conformal supergravity has the component field content (2.45), and W_abc^ij is the superspace lift of T_abc^ij.
    The superspace is engineered around the known component multiplet of [15]; an incomplete starting multiplet would invalidate the off-shell claim.
  • domain assumption All curvatures, torsions and structure functions are generated by W_abc^ij and its descendants; no independent dimension-0 or 1/2 torsion appears in the {Q,Q} commutator.
    This is the defining ansatz of conformal superspace, justified in Section 3.1 by representation theory and dilatation weights; it is a modeling assumption, not a theorem.
  • ad hoc to paper The two lowest Bianchi identities (3.65a) and (3.65b) imply the remaining dimension 5/2 and 3 Bianchi identities for this gauged algebra.
    Section 3.3 explicitly says this is not rigorously proven and the higher identities were not checked; the complete gauged algebra claim relies on it.
  • domain assumption The N=(1,0) results of [24,69], including the existence of a unique N=(2,0) upliftable combination of invariants, are correct and can be used to fix the final Bach coefficient b7=0.
    Section 6.2 uses the truncation to N=(1,0) as an external benchmark; [69] has overlapping authorship with the present paper.
  • domain assumption Equation (6.1), taken from [91], is the correct supercurrent conservation equation for the N=(2,0) Bach tensor.
    The paper states the conservation equation is expected but does not verify it for the constructed B_ij,kl.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Six-dimensional $\mathcal{N}=(2,0)$ Conformal Superspace." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/XAXTIEZV

@misc{pith2026250601630,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Six-dimensional $\mathcalN=(2,0)$ Conformal Superspace},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/XAXTIEZV}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.01630}
}
abstract

We develop a new off-shell formulation for six-dimensional conformal supergravity obtained by gauging the 6D $\mathcal{N}=(2,0)$ superconformal algebra in superspace. We provide the complete gauged algebra, which proves to be considerably constrained compared to other conformal superspaces constructed in the past. This formulation is employed to obtain the unique 6D $\mathcal{N}=(2,0)$ Bach tensor superfield, which describes the multiplet of equations of motions for conformal supergravity, by using a general ansatz fixed by truncation to 6D $\mathcal{N}=(1,0)$ results. We also translate some results into components for precise matching against the literature.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Nonlinear self-duality for arbitrary spin, superspin, and supersymmetry type

    hep-th 2026-02 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Every U(1) duality-invariant (super)conformal gauge theory of arbitrary (super)spin obeys a universal self-duality equation, is Legendre self-dual, and (for spin > 1) lives only on conformally flat backgrounds.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

95 extracted references · 28 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [15]

    (2,0) tensor multiplets and conformal supergravity in D = 6,

    E. Bergshoeff, E. Sezgin, and A. Van Proeyen, “(2,0) tensor multiplets and conformal supergravity in D = 6,” Class. Quant. Grav. 16 (1999) 3193–3206, arXiv:hep-th/9904085

    arXiv 1999

  2. [1]

    Scale invariance and gravitational coupling,

    S. Deser, “Scale invariance and gravitational coupling,” Annals Phys. 59 (1970) 248–253

    1970

  3. [2]

    Effective lagrangians and broken symmetries,

    B. Zumino, “Effective lagrangians and broken symmetries,” in Lectures on Elementary Particles and Quantum Field Theory, Vol. 2 , S. Deser, M. Grisaru, and H. Pendleton, eds., pp. 437–500. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1970

    1970

  4. [3]

    D. Z. Freedman and A. Van Proeyen, Supergravity. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK, 5, 2012

    2012

  5. [4]

    Lauria and A

    E. Lauria and A. Van Proeyen, N = 2 Supergravity in D = 4, 5, 6 Dimensions, vol. 966. 3, 2020. arXiv:2004.11433 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2020

  6. [5]

    S. J. Gates, M. T. Grisaru, M. Rocek, and W. Siegel, Superspace Or One Thousand and One Lessons in Supersymmetry , vol. 58 of Frontiers in Physics

  7. [6]

    I. L. Buchbinder and S. M. Kuzenko, Ideas and Methods of Supersymmetry and Supergravity or A Walk Through Superspace: A Walk Through Superspace . Taylor & Francis, 1998

    1998

  8. [7]

    S. M. Kuzenko, E. S. N. Raptakis, and G. Tartaglino-Mazzucchelli, Superspace Approaches to N = 1 Supergravity. 2023. arXiv:2210.17088 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2023

Show all 95 references
  1. [8]

    S. M. Kuzenko, E. S. N. Raptakis, and G. Tartaglino-Mazzucchelli, Covariant Superspace Approaches to N = 2 Supergravity. 2023. arXiv:2211.11162 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  2. [9]

    Transformation Rules of N=2 Supergravity Multiplets,

    B. de Wit, J. W. van Holten, and A. Van Proeyen, “Transformation Rules of N=2 Supergravity Multiplets,” Nucl. Phys. B 167 (1980) 186

    1980

  3. [10]

    Extended Conformal Supergravity,

    E. Bergshoeff, M. de Roo, and B. de Wit, “Extended Conformal Supergravity,” Nucl. Phys. B 182 (1981) 173–204

    1981

  4. [11]

    Superfield Supergravity,

    W. Siegel and S. J. Gates, Jr., “Superfield Supergravity,” Nucl. Phys. B 147 (1979) 77–104

    1979

  5. [12]

    Supergravity in Superspace,

    P. S. Howe, “Supergravity in Superspace,” Nucl. Phys. B 199 (1982) 309–364. 78

    1982

  6. [13]

    ASYMPTOTIC FREEDOM IN EXTENDED CONFORMAL SUPERGRA VITIES,

    E. S. Fradkin and A. A. Tseytlin, “ASYMPTOTIC FREEDOM IN EXTENDED CONFORMAL SUPERGRA VITIES,”Phys. Lett. B 110 (1982) 117–122. [Erratum: Phys.Lett.B 126, (1983)]

    1982

  7. [14]

    Superconformal Tensor Calculus and Matter Couplings in Six-dimensions,

    E. Bergshoeff, E. Sezgin, and A. Van Proeyen, “Superconformal Tensor Calculus and Matter Couplings in Six-dimensions,” Nucl. Phys. B 264 (1986)

    1986

  8. [16]

    Supergravity tensor calculus in 5-D from 6-D,

    T. Kugo and K. Ohashi, “Supergravity tensor calculus in 5-D from 6-D,” Prog. Theor. Phys. 104 (2000) 835–865, arXiv:hep-ph/0006231

    2000 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Weyl multiplets of N=2 conformal supergravity in five-dimensions,

    E. Bergshoeff, T. de Wit, R. Halbersma, S. Cucu, M. Derix, and A. Van Proeyen, “Weyl multiplets of N=2 conformal supergravity in five-dimensions,” JHEP 06 (2001) 051, arXiv:hep-th/0104113

    2001 arXiv

  10. [18]

    N=1 Conformal Superspace in Four Dimensions,

    D. Butter, “N=1 Conformal Superspace in Four Dimensions,” Annals Phys. 325 (2010) 1026–1080, arXiv:0906.4399 [hep-th]

    2010 arXiv

  11. [19]

    N=2 Conformal Superspace in Four Dimensions,

    D. Butter, “N=2 Conformal Superspace in Four Dimensions,” JHEP 10 (2011) 030, arXiv:1103.5914 [hep-th]

    2011 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Off-shell supergravity-matter couplings in three dimensions,

    S. M. Kuzenko, U. Lindstrom, and G. Tartaglino-Mazzucchelli, “Off-shell supergravity-matter couplings in three dimensions,” JHEP 03 (2011) 120, arXiv:1101.4013 [hep-th]

    2011 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Conformal supergravity in three dimensions: New off-shell formulation,

    D. Butter, S. M. Kuzenko, J. Novak, and G. Tartaglino-Mazzucchelli, “Conformal supergravity in three dimensions: New off-shell formulation,” JHEP 09 (2013) 072, arXiv:1305.3132 [hep-th]

    2013 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Conformal supergravity in three dimensions: Off-shell actions,

    D. Butter, S. M. Kuzenko, J. Novak, and G. Tartaglino-Mazzucchelli, “Conformal supergravity in three dimensions: Off-shell actions,” JHEP 10 (2013) 073, arXiv:1306.1205 [hep-th]

    2013 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Conformal supergravity in five dimensions: New approach and applications,

    D. Butter, S. M. Kuzenko, J. Novak, and G. Tartaglino-Mazzucchelli, “Conformal supergravity in five dimensions: New approach and applications,” JHEP 02 (2015) 111, arXiv:1410.8682 [hep-th]. 79

    2015 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Invariants for minimal conformal supergravity in six dimensions,

    D. Butter, S. M. Kuzenko, J. Novak, and S. Theisen, “Invariants for minimal conformal supergravity in six dimensions,” JHEP 12 (2016) 072, arXiv:1606.02921 [hep-th]

    2016 arXiv

  17. [25]

    N = 2 dilaton Weyl multiplet in 4D supergravity,

    D. Butter, S. Hegde, I. Lodato, and B. Sahoo, “ N = 2 dilaton Weyl multiplet in 4D supergravity,” JHEP 03 (2018) 154, arXiv:1712.05365 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  18. [26]

    N = 4 conformal supergravity: the complete actions,

    D. Butter, F. Ciceri, and B. Sahoo, “ N = 4 conformal supergravity: the complete actions,” JHEP 01 (2020) 029, arXiv:1910.11874 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Local supertwistors and conformal supergravity in six dimensions,

    P. S. Howe and U. Lindstr¨ om, “Local supertwistors and conformal supergravity in six dimensions,” Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 476 no. 2243, (2020) 20200683, arXiv:2008.10302 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Superconformal geometries and local twistors,

    P. S. Howe and U. Lindstr¨ om, “Superconformal geometries and local twistors,” JHEP 04 (2021) 140, arXiv:2012.03282 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Hyperdilaton Weyl multiplets of 5D and 6D minimal conformal supergravity,

    J. Hutomo, S. Khandelwal, G. Tartaglino-Mazzucchelli, and J. Woods, “Hyperdilaton Weyl multiplets of 5D and 6D minimal conformal supergravity,” Phys. Rev. D 107 no. 4, (2023) 046009, arXiv:2209.05748 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Conformal (p, q) supergeometries in two dimensions,

    S. M. Kuzenko and E. S. N. Raptakis, “Conformal (p, q) supergeometries in two dimensions,” JHEP 02 (2023) 166, arXiv:2211.16169 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  23. [31]

    N = 3 conformal superspace in four dimensions,

    S. M. Kuzenko and E. S. N. Raptakis, “ N = 3 conformal superspace in four dimensions,” JHEP 03 (2024) 026, arXiv:2312.07242 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  24. [32]

    N = 2 conformal supergravity in five dimensions,

    S. Adhikari and B. Sahoo, “ N = 2 conformal supergravity in five dimensions,” JHEP 07 (2024) 028, arXiv:2312.01879 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Dilaton Weyl multiplets for N = 3 conformal supergravity in four dimensions,

    S. Adhikari, A. Aikot, M. Mishra, and B. Sahoo, “Dilaton Weyl multiplets for N = 3 conformal supergravity in four dimensions,” JHEP 04 (2025) 062, arXiv:2412.14874 [hep-th]

    2025 arXiv

  26. [34]

    SU(2) × SU(2) dilaton Weyl multiplets for maximal conformal supergravity in four, five, and six dimensions,

    S. Adhikari and B. Sahoo, “SU(2) × SU(2) dilaton Weyl multiplets for maximal conformal supergravity in four, five, and six dimensions,” JHEP 02 (2025) 059, arXiv:2411.16322 [hep-th]

    2025 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Variant dilaton Weyl Multiplet for N=3 conformal supergravity in four dimensions,

    S. Adhikari, A. Aikot, B. Sahoo, and M. Mishra, “Variant dilaton Weyl Multiplet for N=3 conformal supergravity in four dimensions,” arXiv:2502.13683 [hep-th]. 80

    arXiv

  28. [36]

    N = 3 nonlinear multiplet and supergravity,

    S. M. Kuzenko and E. S. N. Raptakis, “ N = 3 nonlinear multiplet and supergravity,” arXiv:2501.11339 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  29. [37]

    Localization techniques in quantum field theories,

    V. Pestun et al., “Localization techniques in quantum field theories,” J. Phys. A 50 no. 44, (2017) 440301, arXiv:1608.02952 [hep-th]

    2017 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Higher Derivative Corrections and Central Charges from Wrapped M5-branes,

    M. Baggio, N. Halmagyi, D. R. Mayerson, D. Robbins, and B. Wecht, “Higher Derivative Corrections and Central Charges from Wrapped M5-branes,” JHEP 12 (2014) 042, arXiv:1408.2538 [hep-th]

    2014 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Curvature squared invariants in six-dimensional N = (1, 0) supergravity,

    D. Butter, J. Novak, M. Ozkan, Y. Pang, and G. Tartaglino-Mazzucchelli, “Curvature squared invariants in six-dimensional N = (1, 0) supergravity,” JHEP 04 (2019) 013, arXiv:1808.00459 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  32. [40]

    The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Higher-Derivative Supergravity in AdS 4 Holography,

    N. Bobev, A. M. Charles, K. Hristov, and V. Reys, “The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Higher-Derivative Supergravity in AdS 4 Holography,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 no. 13, (2020) 131601, arXiv:2006.09390 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Higher-derivative supergravity, AdS4 holography, and black holes,

    N. Bobev, A. M. Charles, K. Hristov, and V. Reys, “Higher-derivative supergravity, AdS4 holography, and black holes,” JHEP 08 (2021) 173, arXiv:2106.04581 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  34. [42]

    AdS 5 holography and higher-derivative supergravity,

    N. Bobev, K. Hristov, and V. Reys, “AdS 5 holography and higher-derivative supergravity,” JHEP 04 (2022) 088, arXiv:2112.06961 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Four-derivative corrections to minimal gauged supergravity in five dimensions,

    J. T. Liu and R. J. Saskowski, “Four-derivative corrections to minimal gauged supergravity in five dimensions,” JHEP 05 (2022) 171, arXiv:2201.04690 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  36. [44]

    ABJM at finite N via 4d supergravity,

    K. Hristov, “ABJM at finite N via 4d supergravity,” JHEP 10 (2022) 190, arXiv:2204.02992 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Corrections to AdS5 black hole thermodynamics from higher-derivative supergravity,

    D. Cassani, A. Ruip´ erez, and E. Turetta, “Corrections to AdS5 black hole thermodynamics from higher-derivative supergravity,” JHEP 11 (2022) 059, arXiv:2208.01007 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  38. [46]

    All Gauged Curvature-Squared Supergravities in Five Dimensions,

    G. Gold, J. Hutomo, S. Khandelwal, M. Ozkan, Y. Pang, and G. Tartaglino-Mazzucchelli, “All Gauged Curvature-Squared Supergravities in Five Dimensions,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 131 no. 25, (2023) 251603, arXiv:2309.07637 [hep-th]. 81

    2023 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Higher-derivative corrections to flavoured BPS black hole thermodynamics and holography,

    D. Cassani, A. Ruip´ erez, and E. Turetta, “Higher-derivative corrections to flavoured BPS black hole thermodynamics and holography,” JHEP 05 (2024) 276, arXiv:2403.02410 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Conformal anomalies for (maximal) 6d conformal supergravity,

    L. Casarin, C. Kennedy, and G. Tartaglino-Mazzucchelli, “Conformal anomalies for (maximal) 6d conformal supergravity,” JHEP 10 (2024) 227, arXiv:2403.07509 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Effectiveness of Weyl gravity in probing quantum corrections to AdS black holes,

    L. Ma, P.-J. Hu, Y. Pang, and H. Lu, “Effectiveness of Weyl gravity in probing quantum corrections to AdS black holes,” Phys. Rev. D 110 no. 2, (2024) L021901, arXiv:2403.12131 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  42. [50]

    R. J. Saskowski, Explorations in Precision Holography and Higher-derivative Supergravity. PhD thesis, Michigan U., 2024. arXiv:2404.04134 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Equivariant localization and gluing rules in 4d N = 2 higher derivative supergravity,

    K. Hristov, “Equivariant localization and gluing rules in 4d N = 2 higher derivative supergravity,” 6, 2024. arXiv:2406.18648 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Localization of the 5D supergravity action and Euclidean saddles for the black hole index,

    D. Cassani, A. Ruip´ erez, and E. Turetta, “Localization of the 5D supergravity action and Euclidean saddles for the black hole index,” JHEP 12 (2024) 086, arXiv:2409.01332 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Higher derivative supergravities in diverse dimensions,

    M. Ozkan, Y. Pang, and E. Sezgin, “Higher derivative supergravities in diverse dimensions,” Phys. Rept. 1086 (2024) 1–95, arXiv:2401.08945 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Implications of conformal invariance in field theories for general dimensions,

    H. Osborn and A. C. Petkou, “Implications of conformal invariance in field theories for general dimensions,” Annals Phys. 231 (1994) 311–362, arXiv:hep-th/9307010

    1994 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Quantum Inequivalence of Different Field Representations,

    M. J. Duff and P. van Nieuwenhuizen, “Quantum Inequivalence of Different Field Representations,” Phys. Lett. B 94 (1980) 179–182

    1980

  48. [56]

    Twenty years of the Weyl anomaly,

    M. J. Duff, “Twenty years of the Weyl anomaly,” Class. Quant. Grav. 11 (1994) 1387–1404, arXiv:hep-th/9308075

    1994 arXiv

  49. [57]

    WEYL COCYCLES,

    L. Bonora, P. Pasti, and M. Bregola, “WEYL COCYCLES,” Class. Quant. Grav. 3 (1986) 635

    1986

  50. [58]

    Matter Superfields in External Supergravity: Green Functions, Effective Action and Superconformal Anomalies,

    I. L. Buchbinder and S. M. Kuzenko, “Matter Superfields in External Supergravity: Green Functions, Effective Action and Superconformal Anomalies,” Nucl. Phys. B 274 (1986) 653–684. 82

    1986

  51. [59]

    Super-Weyl anomalies in N=2 supergravity and (non)local effective actions,

    S. M. Kuzenko, “Super-Weyl anomalies in N=2 supergravity and (non)local effective actions,” JHEP 10 (2013) 151, arXiv:1307.7586 [hep-th]

    2013 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Anomalies, Conformal Manifolds, and Spheres,

    J. Gomis, P.-S. Hsin, Z. Komargodski, A. Schwimmer, N. Seiberg, and S. Theisen, “Anomalies, Conformal Manifolds, and Spheres,” JHEP 03 (2016) 022, arXiv:1509.08511 [hep-th]

    2016 arXiv

  53. [61]

    Anomalies, renormalization group flows, and the a-theorem in six-dimensional (1, 0) theories,

    C. Cordova, T. T. Dumitrescu, and K. Intriligator, “Anomalies, renormalization group flows, and the a-theorem in six-dimensional (1, 0) theories,” JHEP 10 (2016) 080, arXiv:1506.03807 [hep-th]

    2016 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Higher derivative terms, toroidal compactification, and Weyl anomalies in six-dimensional (2, 0) theories,

    C. Cordova, T. T. Dumitrescu, and X. Yin, “Higher derivative terms, toroidal compactification, and Weyl anomalies in six-dimensional (2, 0) theories,” JHEP 10 (2019) 128, arXiv:1505.03850 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  55. [63]

    Stress Tensors from Trace Anomalies in Conformal Field Theories,

    C. P. Herzog and K.-W. Huang, “Stress Tensors from Trace Anomalies in Conformal Field Theories,” Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 081901, arXiv:1301.5002 [hep-th]

    2013 arXiv

  56. [64]

    Conformal anomaly of (2,0) tensor multiplet in six-dimensions and AdS / CFT correspondence,

    F. Bastianelli, S. Frolov, and A. A. Tseytlin, “Conformal anomaly of (2,0) tensor multiplet in six-dimensions and AdS / CFT correspondence,” JHEP 02 (2000) 013, arXiv:hep-th/0001041

    2000 arXiv

  57. [65]

    Geometric classification of conformal anomalies in arbitrary dimensions,

    S. Deser and A. Schwimmer, “Geometric classification of conformal anomalies in arbitrary dimensions,” Phys. Lett. B 309 (1993) 279–284, arXiv:hep-th/9302047

    1993 arXiv

  58. [66]

    Supersymmetries and Their Representations,

    W. Nahm, “Supersymmetries and Their Representations,” Nucl. Phys. B 135 (1978) 149

    1978

  59. [67]

    Supersymmetry Constraints in Holographic Gravities,

    M. Kulaxizi and A. Parnachev, “Supersymmetry Constraints in Holographic Gravities,” Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 066001, arXiv:0912.4244 [hep-th]

    2010 arXiv

  60. [68]

    Conformal a-anomaly of some non-unitary 6d superconformal theories,

    M. Beccaria and A. A. Tseytlin, “Conformal a-anomaly of some non-unitary 6d superconformal theories,” JHEP 09 (2015) 017, arXiv:1506.08727 [hep-th]

    2015 arXiv

  61. [69]

    The component structure of conformal supergravity invariants in six dimensions,

    D. Butter, J. Novak, and G. Tartaglino-Mazzucchelli, “The component structure of conformal supergravity invariants in six dimensions,” JHEP 05 (2017) 133, arXiv:1701.08163 [hep-th]

    2017 arXiv

  62. [70]

    Conformal anomalies in 6D four-derivative theories: A heat-kernel analysis,

    L. Casarin, “Conformal anomalies in 6D four-derivative theories: A heat-kernel analysis,” Phys. Rev. D 108 no. 2, (2023) 025014, arXiv:2306.05944 [hep-th]. 83

    2023 arXiv

  63. [71]

    Castellani, R

    L. Castellani, R. D’Auria, and P. Fr` e,Supergravity and Superstrings: A Geometric Perspective. Vol. 2: Supergravity . World Scientific, Singapore, 1991

    1991

  64. [72]

    Component actions from curved superspace: Normal coordinates and ectoplasm,

    S. J. Gates, Jr., M. T. Grisaru, M. E. Knutt-Wehlau, and W. Siegel, “Component actions from curved superspace: Normal coordinates and ectoplasm,” Phys. Lett. B 421 (1998) 203–210, arXiv:hep-th/9711151

    1998 arXiv

  65. [73]

    Ectoplasm has no topology,

    S. J. Gates, Jr., “Ectoplasm has no topology,” Nucl. Phys. B 541 (1999) 615–650, arXiv:hep-th/9809056

    1999 arXiv

  66. [74]

    N=6 superconformal gravity in three dimensions from superspace,

    S. M. Kuzenko, J. Novak, and G. Tartaglino-Mazzucchelli, “N=6 superconformal gravity in three dimensions from superspace,” JHEP 01 (2014) 121, arXiv:1308.5552 [hep-th]

    2014 arXiv

  67. [75]

    Construction of all N=4 conformal supergravities,

    D. Butter, F. Ciceri, B. de Wit, and B. Sahoo, “Construction of all N=4 conformal supergravities,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 no. 8, (2017) 081602, arXiv:1609.09083 [hep-th]

    2017 arXiv

  68. [76]

    Gauss-Bonnet supergravity in six dimensions,

    J. Novak, M. Ozkan, Y. Pang, and G. Tartaglino-Mazzucchelli, “Gauss-Bonnet supergravity in six dimensions,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 no. 11, (2017) 111602, arXiv:1706.09330 [hep-th]

    2017 arXiv

  69. [77]

    Curvature-squared invariants of minimal five-dimensional supergravity from superspace,

    G. Gold, J. Hutomo, S. Khandelwal, and G. Tartaglino-Mazzucchelli, “Curvature-squared invariants of minimal five-dimensional supergravity from superspace,” Phys. Rev. D 107 no. 10, (2023) 106013, arXiv:2302.14295 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  70. [78]

    Components of curvature-squared invariants of minimal supergravity in five dimensions,

    G. Gold, J. Hutomo, S. Khandelwal, and G. Tartaglino-Mazzucchelli, “Components of curvature-squared invariants of minimal supergravity in five dimensions,” JHEP 07 (2024) 221, arXiv:2311.00679 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  71. [79]

    New higher-derivative invariants in N=2 supergravity and the Gauss-Bonnet term,

    D. Butter, B. de Wit, S. M. Kuzenko, and I. Lodato, “New higher-derivative invariants in N=2 supergravity and the Gauss-Bonnet term,” JHEP 12 (2013) 062, arXiv:1307.6546 [hep-th]

    2013 arXiv

  72. [80]

    Supergravity-matter actions in three dimensions and Chern-Simons terms,

    S. M. Kuzenko and J. Novak, “Supergravity-matter actions in three dimensions and Chern-Simons terms,” JHEP 05 (2014) 093, arXiv:1401.2307 [hep-th]

    2014 arXiv

  73. [81]

    Higher derivative couplings and massive supergravity in three dimensions,

    S. M. Kuzenko, J. Novak, and G. Tartaglino-Mazzucchelli, “Higher derivative couplings and massive supergravity in three dimensions,” JHEP 09 (2015) 081, arXiv:1506.09063 [hep-th]. 84

    2015 arXiv

  74. [82]

    On curvature squared terms in N=2 supergravity,

    S. M. Kuzenko and J. Novak, “On curvature squared terms in N=2 supergravity,” Phys. Rev. D 92 no. 8, (2015) 085033, arXiv:1507.04922 [hep-th]

    2015 arXiv

  75. [83]

    Minimal N = 4 topologically massive supergravity,

    S. M. Kuzenko, J. Novak, and I. Sachs, “Minimal N = 4 topologically massive supergravity,” JHEP 03 (2017) 109, arXiv:1610.09895 [hep-th]

    2017 arXiv

  76. [84]

    Kowalski, An Introduction to the Representation Theory of Groups

    E. Kowalski, An Introduction to the Representation Theory of Groups . American Mathematical Society, 2014

    2014

  77. [85]

    Fulton and J

    W. Fulton and J. Harris, Representation Theory: A First Course . Springer New York, 1991

    1991

  78. [86]

    A Field-theory motivated approach to symbolic computer algebra,

    K. Peeters, “A Field-theory motivated approach to symbolic computer algebra,” Comput. Phys. Commun. 176 (2007) 550–558, arXiv:cs/0608005

    2007 arXiv

  79. [87]

    Introducing Cadabra: A Symbolic computer algebra system for field theory problems,

    K. Peeters, “Introducing Cadabra: A Symbolic computer algebra system for field theory problems,” arXiv:hep-th/0701238

    arXiv

  80. [88]

    Cadabra2: computer algebra for field theory revisited,

    K. Peeters, “Cadabra2: computer algebra for field theory revisited,” J. Open Source Softw. 3 no. 32, (2018) 1118

    2018

  81. [89]

    Supergravity Component Reduction with Computer Algebra,

    G. Gold, S. Khandelwal, and G. Tartaglino-Mazzucchelli, “Supergravity Component Reduction with Computer Algebra,” 6, 2024. arXiv:2406.19687 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  82. [90]

    SUGRA Component Reduction,

    G. Gold, S. Khandelwal, and G. Tartaglino-Mazzucchelli, “SUGRA Component Reduction,” 2024. https://github.com/gregory-gold/sugra-component-reduction

    2024

  83. [91]

    Non-conformal supercurrents in six dimensions,

    S. M. Kuzenko, J. Novak, and S. Theisen, “Non-conformal supercurrents in six dimensions,” JHEP 02 (2018) 030, arXiv:1709.09892 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  84. [92]

    B. E. Sagan, The Symmetric Group: Representations, Combinatorial Algorithms, and Symmetric Functions . Springer New York, 2001

    2001

  85. [93]

    J. G. D., The Representation Theory of the Symmetric Groups . Springer Berlin, Heidelberg, 1978. 85

    1978

  86. [653]

    [Erratum: Nucl.Phys.B 598, 667 (2001)]

    2001

  87. [1983]

    arXiv:hep-th/0108200

    arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.