Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

E3D-Bench: A Benchmark for End-to-End 3D Geometric Foundation Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2506.01933 v3 pith:LFTWL7OJ submitted 2025-06-02 cs.CV

E3D-Bench: A Benchmark for End-to-End 3D Geometric Foundation Models

classification cs.CV
keywords estimationdepthevaluationfoundationgfmsmodelsbenchmarkcamera
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Spatial intelligence, encompassing 3D reconstruction, perception, and reasoning, is fundamental to applications such as robotics, aerial imaging, and extended reality. A key enabler is the real-time, accurate estimation of core 3D attributes (camera parameters, point clouds, depth maps, and 3D point tracks) from unstructured or streaming imagery. Inspired by the success of large foundation models in language and 2D vision, a new class of end-to-end 3D geometric foundation models (GFMs) has emerged, directly predicting dense 3D representations in a single feed-forward pass, eliminating the need for slow or unavailable precomputed camera parameters. Since late 2023, the field has exploded with diverse variants, but systematic evaluation is lacking. In this work, we present the first comprehensive benchmark for 3D GFMs, covering five core tasks: sparse-view depth estimation, video depth estimation, 3D reconstruction, multi-view pose estimation, novel view synthesis, and spanning both standard and challenging out-of-distribution datasets. Our standardized toolkit automates dataset handling, evaluation protocols, and metric computation to ensure fair, reproducible comparisons. We evaluate 16 state-of-the-art GFMs, revealing their strengths and limitations across tasks and domains, and derive key insights to guide future model scaling and optimization. All code, evaluation scripts, and processed data will be publicly released to accelerate research in 3D spatial intelligence.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. SpatialBench: Is Your Spatial Foundation Model an All-Round Player?

    cs.CV 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 8.0

    SpatialBench evaluates 41 spatial foundation models across 6 paradigms and 5 task suites, finds they are not all-round players, and introduces the DA-Next-5M dataset plus DA-Next baseline model.

  2. ViPE: Video Pose Engine for 3D Geometric Perception

    cs.CV 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    ViPE estimates camera intrinsics, motion, and dense near-metric depth from uncalibrated videos, outperforming baselines on TUM and KITTI while releasing annotations for 96M frames across real and generated videos.

  3. Seeing Where to Deploy: Metric RGB-Based Traversability Analysis for Aerial-to-Ground Hidden Space Inspection

    cs.RO 2026-03 conditional novelty 4.0

    An RGB-only UAV pipeline recovers metric scale from onboard egomotion and fuses geometry with semantics to select safe UGV deployment zones in hidden-space inspection.