pith. sign in

arxiv: 2506.02142 · v2 · submitted 2025-06-02 · ✦ hep-th · gr-qc

Gravitons on Nariai Edges

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 10:49 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th gr-qc
keywords graviton path integralNariai geometryone-loop determinantedge modesEinstein manifoldde Sitter spacehorizon thermodynamics
0
0 comments X p. Extension

The pith

For any d at least 3 the one-loop graviton path integral on S squared times S to the d minus one factorizes into bulk and edge parts with the bulk matching the thermal partition function of an ideal graviton gas in Lorentzian Nariai space.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that the one-loop graviton path integral on the product space S squared times S to the d minus one separates into bulk and edge contributions for every dimension d of at least 3. The bulk contribution equals the thermal partition function of an ideal gas of gravitons in the Lorentzian Nariai geometry. The edge contribution is the inverse of a path integral over two copies of a shift-symmetric vector field together with three shift-symmetric scalar fields on the S to the d minus one sphere. All the scalars turn out to be massless, which differs from the round sphere case and indicates that the edge modes carry information beyond the horizon's own geometry. In deriving this result the authors also produce a compact expression for the one-loop Euclidean graviton determinant on any Einstein manifold with positive cosmological constant.

Core claim

The central claim is that for any d greater than or equal to 3 the one-loop Euclidean graviton path integral on S squared times S to the d minus one factorizes into a bulk piece that equals the thermal partition function of an ideal graviton gas in the Lorentzian Nariai geometry and an edge piece that is the inverse of the path integral of two identical copies each containing one shift-symmetric vector and three shift-symmetric scalars on S to the d minus one; unlike the round S to the d plus one case all scalars remain massless, showing that graviton edge partition functions probe beyond the horizon's intrinsic geometry in contrast to p-form gauge theories; along the way a compact formula,

What carries the argument

The factorization of the one-loop graviton path integral on S squared times S to the d minus one into a bulk Nariai thermal partition function and an edge contribution given by the inverse of two copies of shift-symmetric vector and scalar path integrals on S to the d minus one.

If this is right

  • The bulk contribution exactly reproduces the thermal partition function of an ideal graviton gas in Lorentzian Nariai geometry.
  • All scalars appearing in the edge factor are massless, in contrast to the massive scalars found on the round sphere.
  • Graviton edge partition functions therefore probe information beyond the intrinsic geometry of the horizon, unlike p-form gauge theories.
  • A compact formula is now available for the one-loop Euclidean graviton path integral on any Einstein manifold with positive cosmological constant.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The split may let one compute quantum corrections in de Sitter-like geometries by evaluating simpler Euclidean determinants on product manifolds.
  • Similar bulk-edge decompositions could be tested for other fields or at higher loop order on the same family of spaces.
  • The massless edge scalars might link to soft modes or large gauge transformations that affect horizon entropy calculations.

Load-bearing premise

The edge factor is correctly identified as the inverse of the path integral over two copies of shift-symmetric vector and scalar fields on S to the d minus one, relying on the standard treatment of gauge fixing, zero modes, and the precise definition of those shift-symmetric fields in the one-loop determinant.

What would settle it

An explicit computation of the full one-loop graviton determinant on S squared times S to the d minus one that fails to equal the product of the Lorentzian Nariai thermal partition function and the stated inverse edge factor would falsify the claimed factorization.

read the original abstract

We show that, for any $d\geq 3$, the one-loop graviton path integral on $S^2\times S^{d-1}$ factorizes into bulk and edge parts. The bulk equals the thermal partition function of an ideal graviton gas in the Lorentzian Nariai geometry. The edge factor is the inverse of the path integral over two identical copies, each containing one shift-symmetric vector and three shift-symmetric scalars on $S^{d-1}$. Unlike the round $S^{d+1}$ case, all scalars are massless, indicating that graviton edge partition functions probe beyond the horizon's intrinsic geometry - in contrast to $p$-form gauge theories. In the course of this work, we obtain a compact formula for the one-loop Euclidean graviton path integral on any $\Lambda >0$ Einstein manifold.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript shows that for any d ≥ 3 the one-loop graviton path integral on the product manifold S² × S^{d-1} factorizes into bulk and edge contributions. The bulk factor equals the thermal partition function of an ideal graviton gas in the Lorentzian Nariai geometry. The edge factor is identified as the inverse of the one-loop path integral over two identical copies of a shift-symmetric vector field together with three shift-symmetric scalar fields, all massless, on S^{d-1}. In the course of the derivation the authors also obtain a compact formula for the one-loop Euclidean graviton path integral on an arbitrary Einstein manifold with positive cosmological constant.

Significance. If the central factorization and the identification of the edge modes hold, the result supplies a concrete Euclidean-to-Lorentzian bridge for graviton one-loop effects in de Sitter-like backgrounds and isolates the contribution of edge degrees of freedom. The compact formula for general positive-Λ Einstein manifolds is a reusable technical tool that strengthens the paper. The observation that all edge scalars remain massless (in contrast to the round-sphere case) is a clear, falsifiable distinction from p-form theories and indicates that graviton edge partition functions encode information beyond the intrinsic horizon geometry.

major comments (2)
  1. [§4] §4, the edge-factor identification: the manuscript states that the edge contribution is exactly the inverse of two copies of (one shift-symmetric vector + three shift-symmetric scalars) on S^{d-1}, but does not display the explicit one-loop determinant computation, zero-mode subtraction, or gauge-fixing procedure for these fields. Because the claimed bulk-edge split and the subsequent match to the Nariai thermal gas rest on this equality, an explicit spectrum calculation (or a reference to a verifiable result) is required.
  2. [§3] The compact formula for the graviton determinant on a general Λ > 0 Einstein manifold (stated in the abstract and used to obtain the bulk factor) is presented without an accompanying check against a known limit, such as the round S^{d+1} result when the S² radius is taken to infinity. Such a consistency test would directly support the factorization claim.
minor comments (2)
  1. [§2] The definition of 'shift-symmetric' fields is used repeatedly but never written explicitly; a short paragraph or footnote giving the precise functional space (e.g., fields with vanishing integral) would remove ambiguity.
  2. [§3] Figure 1 (or the corresponding schematic of the bulk-edge split) would benefit from an explicit indication of which modes are integrated out in the bulk versus retained on the edge.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the constructive comments. We address each of the major comments below, indicating the revisions we intend to make to strengthen the paper.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [§4] §4, the edge-factor identification: the manuscript states that the edge contribution is exactly the inverse of two copies of (one shift-symmetric vector + three shift-symmetric scalars) on S^{d-1}, but does not display the explicit one-loop determinant computation, zero-mode subtraction, or gauge-fixing procedure for these fields. Because the claimed bulk-edge split and the subsequent match to the Nariai thermal gas rest on this equality, an explicit spectrum calculation (or a reference to a verifiable result) is required.

    Authors: We agree with the referee that providing the explicit computation would make the identification more transparent and verifiable. In the revised manuscript, we will add a detailed derivation of the one-loop determinants for the shift-symmetric vector and scalar fields on S^{d-1}. This will include the eigenvalue spectra, the treatment of zero modes, and the gauge-fixing procedure. We plan to include this as a new subsection or appendix to §4. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§3] The compact formula for the graviton determinant on a general Λ > 0 Einstein manifold (stated in the abstract and used to obtain the bulk factor) is presented without an accompanying check against a known limit, such as the round S^{d+1} result when the S² radius is taken to infinity. Such a consistency test would directly support the factorization claim.

    Authors: We appreciate this suggestion for a consistency check. In the revised version, we will include an explicit verification of our compact formula in the limit where the radius of the S² factor tends to infinity. In this limit, the manifold S² × S^{d-1} approaches the round S^{d+1}, and we will show that the graviton one-loop determinant reduces to the known result for the round sphere, thereby supporting the factorization. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: factorization derived from explicit one-loop determinant calculation on product manifold

full rationale

The paper derives the factorization of the one-loop graviton path integral on S²×S^{d-1} by direct computation of the determinant, obtaining a compact formula for any positive-Λ Einstein manifold. The bulk is shown to match the known thermal graviton gas partition function in Lorentzian Nariai geometry, while the edge is identified as the inverse of two copies of shift-symmetric vector plus scalar determinants on S^{d-1}. This identification follows from gauge fixing, zero-mode handling, and spectral decomposition on the product space rather than from redefinition or fitting. No self-citation chain, ansatz smuggling, or input-equals-output reduction is present; the result is externally falsifiable against the Lorentzian thermal gas and independent of the target claim.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Review performed on abstract only; specific free parameters, axioms, or invented entities cannot be extracted. The work implicitly relies on standard one-loop QFT techniques on curved space.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption One-loop approximation via path integral with zeta-function or heat-kernel regularization is valid for gravitons on Einstein manifolds.
    Standard background assumption in the field for computing functional determinants.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5666 in / 1298 out tokens · 39550 ms · 2026-05-19T10:49:16.987994+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Horizon Edge Partition Functions in $\Lambda>0$ Quantum Gravity

    hep-th 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Horizon edge mode spectra in de Sitter and Nariai spacetimes exhibit universal shift symmetries that produce novel symmetry breaking in one-loop partition functions.

  2. Limits on the Statistical Description of Charged de Sitter Black Holes

    hep-th 2025-11 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Adopting the Bousso-Hawking observer normalization for RNdS black holes produces finite heat capacity near the Nariai limit while confirming vanishing capacity in cold and ultracold limits, limiting statistical descriptions.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

114 extracted references · 114 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers · 47 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Quantum de Sitter horizon entropy from quasicanonical bulk, edge, sphere and topological string partition functions,

    D. Anninos, F. Denef, Y. T. A. Law, and Z. Sun, “Quantum de Sitter horizon entropy from quasicanonical bulk, edge, sphere and topological string partition functions,” JHEP 01 (2022) 088, arXiv:2009.12464 [hep-th]

  2. [2]

    On infinitesimal operators of irreducible representations of the Lorentz group of n-th order,

    T. Hirai, “On irreducible representations of the Lorentz group of n-th order,” Proceedings of the Japan Academy 38 no. 6, (1962) 258 – 262. https://doi.org/10.3792/pja/1195523378

  3. [3]

    On infinitesimal operators of irreducible representations of the Lorentz group of n-th order,

    T. Hirai, “On infinitesimal operators of irreducible representations of the Lorentz group of n-th order,” Proceedings of the Japan Academy 38 no. 3, (1962) 83 – 87. https://doi.org/10.3792/pja/1195523460

  4. [4]

    The characters of semisimple lie groups,

    Harish-Chandra, “The characters of semisimple lie groups,” Transactions of the American Mathematical Society 83 no. 1, (1956) 98–163. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1992907

  5. [5]

    Invariant eigendistributions on semisimple lie groups,

    Harish-Chandra, “Invariant eigendistributions on semisimple lie groups,” Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society 69 no. 1, (1963) 117 – 123. https://doi.org/. 32

  6. [6]

    The characters of irreducible representations of the Lorentz group of n-th order,

    T. Hirai, “The characters of irreducible representations of the Lorentz group of n-th order,” Proceedings of the Japan Academy 41 no. 7, (1965) 526 – 531. https://doi.org/10.3792/pja/1195522333

  7. [7]

    Real-time observables in de Sitter thermodynamics,

    M. Grewal and Y. T. A. Law, “Real-time observables in de Sitter thermodynamics,” arXiv:2403.06006 [hep-th]

  8. [8]

    Spinning thermal static patch correlators

    M. Grewal, Y. T. A. Law, and V. Lochab, “Spinning thermal static patch correlators.” In preparation

  9. [9]

    Black hole scattering and partition functions,

    Y. T. A. Law and K. Parmentier, “Black hole scattering and partition functions,” JHEP 10 (2022) 039, arXiv:2207.07024 [hep-th]

  10. [10]

    Characters, Quasinormal Modes, and Quantum de Sitter Thermodynamics,

    Y. T. A. Law, “Characters, Quasinormal Modes, and Quantum de Sitter Thermodynamics,” in CORFU2022: 22th Hellenic School and Workshops on Elementary Particle Physics and Gravity. 4, 2023. arXiv:2304.01471 [hep-th]

  11. [11]

    De Sitter Horizon Edge Partition Functions

    Y. T. A. Law, “De Sitter Horizon Edge Partition Functions,” arXiv:2501.17912 [hep-th]

  12. [12]

    Local subsystems in gauge theory and gravity

    W. Donnelly and L. Freidel, “Local subsystems in gauge theory and gravity,” JHEP 09 (2016) 102, arXiv:1601.04744 [hep-th]

  13. [13]

    Edge modes and corner ambiguities in 3d Chern-Simons theory and gravity

    M. Geiller, “Edge modes and corner ambiguities in 3d Chern–Simons theory and gravity,” Nucl. Phys. B 924 (2017) 312–365, arXiv:1703.04748 [gr-qc]

  14. [14]

    Local phase space and edge modes for diffeomorphism-invariant theories

    A. J. Speranza, “Local phase space and edge modes for diffeomorphism-invariant theories,” JHEP 02 (2018) 021, arXiv:1706.05061 [hep-th]

  15. [15]

    Lorentz-diffeomorphism edge modes in 3d gravity

    M. Geiller, “Lorentz-diffeomorphism edge modes in 3d gravity,” JHEP 02 (2018) 029, arXiv:1712.05269 [gr-qc]

  16. [16]

    Gravitational edge modes: from Kac–Moody charges to Poincar´ e networks,

    L. Freidel, E. R. Livine, and D. Pranzetti, “Gravitational edge modes: from Kac–Moody charges to Poincar´ e networks,”Class. Quant. Grav. 36 no. 19, (2019) 195014, arXiv:1906.07876 [hep-th]

  17. [17]

    Gravity Edges Modes and Hayward Term,

    T. Takayanagi and K. Tamaoka, “Gravity Edges Modes and Hayward Term,” JHEP 02 (2020) 167, arXiv:1912.01636 [hep-th]

  18. [18]

    Edge modes of gravity. Part I. Corner potentials and charges,

    L. Freidel, M. Geiller, and D. Pranzetti, “Edge modes of gravity. Part I. Corner potentials and charges,” JHEP 11 (2020) 026, arXiv:2006.12527 [hep-th]

  19. [19]

    Edge modes of gravity. Part II. Corner metric and Lorentz charges,

    L. Freidel, M. Geiller, and D. Pranzetti, “Edge modes of gravity. Part II. Corner metric and Lorentz charges,” JHEP 11 (2020) 027, arXiv:2007.03563 [hep-th]

  20. [20]

    Edge modes of gravity. Part III. Corner simplicity constraints,

    L. Freidel, M. Geiller, and D. Pranzetti, “Edge modes of gravity. Part III. Corner simplicity constraints,” JHEP 01 (2021) 100, arXiv:2007.12635 [hep-th] . 33

  21. [21]

    Gravitational edge modes, coadjoint orbits, and hydrodynamics,

    W. Donnelly, L. Freidel, S. F. Moosavian, and A. J. Speranza, “Gravitational edge modes, coadjoint orbits, and hydrodynamics,” JHEP 09 (2021) 008, arXiv:2012.10367 [hep-th]

  22. [22]

    Isolated surfaces and symmetries of gravity,

    L. Ciambelli and R. G. Leigh, “Isolated surfaces and symmetries of gravity,” Phys. Rev. D 104 no. 4, (2021) 046005, arXiv:2104.07643 [hep-th]

  23. [23]

    Edge modes as reference frames and boundary actions from post-selection,

    S. Carrozza and P. A. Hoehn, “Edge modes as reference frames and boundary actions from post-selection,” JHEP 02 (2022) 172, arXiv:2109.06184 [hep-th]

  24. [24]

    Embeddings and Integrable Charges for Extended Corner Symmetry,

    L. Ciambelli, R. G. Leigh, and P.-C. Pai, “Embeddings and Integrable Charges for Extended Corner Symmetry,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 128 (2022) , arXiv:2111.13181 [hep-th]

  25. [25]

    Edge modes as dynamical frames: charges from post-selection in generally covariant theories,

    S. Carrozza, S. Eccles, and P. A. Hoehn, “Edge modes as dynamical frames: charges from post-selection in generally covariant theories,” SciPost Phys. 17 no. 2, (2024) 048, arXiv:2205.00913 [hep-th]

  26. [26]

    Universal corner symmetry and the orbit method for gravity,

    L. Ciambelli and R. G. Leigh, “Universal corner symmetry and the orbit method for gravity,” Nucl. Phys. B 986 (2023) 116053, arXiv:2207.06441 [hep-th]

  27. [27]

    A proposal for 3d quantum gravity and its bulk factorization,

    T. G. Mertens, J. Sim´ on, and G. Wong, “A proposal for 3d quantum gravity and its bulk factorization,” JHEP 06 (2023) 134, arXiv:2210.14196 [hep-th]

  28. [28]

    A note on the bulk interpretation of the quantum extremal surface formula,

    G. Wong, “A note on the bulk interpretation of the quantum extremal surface formula,” JHEP 04 (2024) 024, arXiv:2212.03193 [hep-th]

  29. [29]

    Matrix Quantization of Gravitational Edge Modes,

    W. Donnelly, L. Freidel, S. F. Moosavian, and A. J. Speranza, “Matrix Quantization of Gravitational Edge Modes,” JHEP 05 (2023) 163, arXiv:2212.09120 [hep-th]

  30. [30]

    Gravitational edge mode in N = 1 Jackiw-Teitelboim supergravity,

    K.-S. Lee, A. Sivakumar, and J. Yoon, “Gravitational edge mode in N = 1 Jackiw-Teitelboim supergravity,” JHEP 08 (2024) 011, arXiv:2403.17182 [hep-th]

  31. [31]

    Gravitons on the edge,

    A. Blommaert and S. Colin-Ellerin, “Gravitons on the edge,” arXiv:2405.12276 [hep-th]

  32. [32]

    Minimal Areas from Entangled Matrices,

    J. R. Fliss, A. Frenkel, S. A. Hartnoll, and R. M. Soni, “Minimal Areas from Entangled Matrices,” arXiv:2408.05274 [hep-th]

  33. [33]

    Black Hole Entropy and Entropy of Entanglement

    D. N. Kabat, “Black hole entropy and entropy of entanglement,” Nucl. Phys. B 453 (1995) 281–299, arXiv:hep-th/9503016

  34. [34]

    Decomposition of entanglement entropy in lattice gauge theory

    W. Donnelly, “Decomposition of entanglement entropy in lattice gauge theory,” Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 085004, arXiv:1109.0036 [hep-th]

  35. [35]

    Do gauge fields really contribute negatively to black hole entropy?

    W. Donnelly and A. C. Wall, “Do gauge fields really contribute negatively to black hole entropy?,” Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 064042, arXiv:1206.5831 [hep-th]

  36. [36]

    Entanglement and Thermal Entropy of Gauge Fields

    C. Eling, Y. Oz, and S. Theisen, “Entanglement and Thermal Entropy of Gauge Fields,” JHEP 11 (2013) 019, arXiv:1308.4964 [hep-th] . 34

  37. [37]

    Notes on Entanglement in Abelian Gauge Theories

    D. Radicevic, “Notes on Entanglement in Abelian Gauge Theories,” arXiv:1404.1391 [hep-th]

  38. [38]

    Entanglement entropy and nonabelian gauge symmetry

    W. Donnelly, “Entanglement entropy and nonabelian gauge symmetry,” Class. Quant. Grav. 31 no. 21, (2014) 214003, arXiv:1406.7304 [hep-th]

  39. [39]

    Entanglement entropy of electromagnetic edge modes

    W. Donnelly and A. C. Wall, “Entanglement entropy of electromagnetic edge modes,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 114 no. 11, (2015) 111603, arXiv:1412.1895 [hep-th]

  40. [40]

    Central Charge and Entangled Gauge Fields

    K.-W. Huang, “Central Charge and Entangled Gauge Fields,” Phys. Rev. D 92 no. 2, (2015) 025010, arXiv:1412.2730 [hep-th]

  41. [41]

    On The Entanglement Entropy For Gauge Theories

    S. Ghosh, R. M. Soni, and S. P. Trivedi, “On The Entanglement Entropy For Gauge Theories,” JHEP 09 (2015) 069, arXiv:1501.02593 [hep-th]

  42. [42]

    Revisiting Entanglement Entropy of Lattice Gauge Theories

    L.-Y. Hung and Y. Wan, “Revisiting Entanglement Entropy of Lattice Gauge Theories,” JHEP 04 (2015) 122, arXiv:1501.04389 [hep-th]

  43. [43]

    On the definition of entanglement entropy in lattice gauge theories

    S. Aoki, T. Iritani, M. Nozaki, T. Numasawa, N. Shiba, and H. Tasaki, “On the definition of entanglement entropy in lattice gauge theories,” JHEP 06 (2015) 187, arXiv:1502.04267 [hep-th]

  44. [44]

    Geometric entropy and edge modes of the electromagnetic field

    W. Donnelly and A. C. Wall, “Geometric entropy and edge modes of the electromagnetic field,” Phys. Rev. D 94 no. 10, (2016) 104053, arXiv:1506.05792 [hep-th]

  45. [45]

    Entanglement in Weakly Coupled Lattice Gauge Theories

    D. Radiˇ cevi´ c, “Entanglement in Weakly Coupled Lattice Gauge Theories,”JHEP 04 (2016) 163, arXiv:1509.08478 [hep-th]

  46. [46]

    Entanglement Entropy of U(1) Quantum Spin Liquids

    M. Pretko and T. Senthil, “Entanglement entropy of U(1) quantum spin liquids,” Phys. Rev. B 94 no. 12, (2016) 125112, arXiv:1510.03863 [cond-mat.str-el]

  47. [47]

    Aspects of Entanglement Entropy for Gauge Theories

    R. M. Soni and S. P. Trivedi, “Aspects of Entanglement Entropy for Gauge Theories,” JHEP 01 (2016) 136, arXiv:1510.07455 [hep-th]

  48. [48]

    A note on electromagnetic edge modes

    F. Zuo, “A note on electromagnetic edge modes,” arXiv:1601.06910 [hep-th]

  49. [49]

    Entanglement Entropy in (3+1)-d Free $U(1)$ Gauge Theory

    R. M. Soni and S. P. Trivedi, “Entanglement entropy in (3 + 1)-d free U(1) gauge theory,” JHEP 02 (2017) 101, arXiv:1608.00353 [hep-th]

  50. [50]

    On entanglement entropy in non-Abelian lattice gauge theory and 3D quantum gravity

    C. Delcamp, B. Dittrich, and A. Riello, “On entanglement entropy in non-Abelian lattice gauge theory and 3D quantum gravity,” JHEP 11 (2016) 102, arXiv:1609.04806 [hep-th]

  51. [51]

    Gauge-invariant Variables and Entanglement Entropy

    A. Agarwal, D. Karabali, and V. P. Nair, “Gauge-invariant Variables and Entanglement Entropy,” Phys. Rev. D 96 no. 12, (2017) 125008, arXiv:1701.00014 [hep-th] . 35

  52. [52]

    Edge State Quantization: Vector Fields in Rindler

    A. Blommaert, T. G. Mertens, H. Verschelde, and V. I. Zakharov, “Edge State Quantization: Vector Fields in Rindler,” JHEP 08 (2018) 196, arXiv:1801.09910 [hep-th]

  53. [53]

    Edge Dynamics from the Path Integral: Maxwell and Yang-Mills

    A. Blommaert, T. G. Mertens, and H. Verschelde, “Edge dynamics from the path integral — Maxwell and Yang-Mills,” JHEP 11 (2018) 080, arXiv:1804.07585 [hep-th]

  54. [54]

    Electromagnetic duality and central charge

    L. Freidel and D. Pranzetti, “Electromagnetic duality and central charge,” Phys. Rev. D 98 no. 11, (2018) 116008, arXiv:1806.03161 [hep-th]

  55. [55]

    Dynamical edge modes and entanglement in Maxwell theory,

    A. Ball, Y. T. A. Law, and G. Wong, “Dynamical edge modes and entanglement in Maxwell theory,” JHEP 09 (2024) 032, arXiv:2403.14542 [hep-th]

  56. [56]

    Soft edges: the many links between soft and edge modes,

    G. Araujo-Regado, P. A. Hoehn, F. Sartini, and B. Tomova, “Soft edges: the many links between soft and edge modes,” arXiv:2412.14548 [hep-th]

  57. [57]

    Renyi entropy and C_T for p-forms on even spheres

    J. S. Dowker, “Renyi entropy and CT for p-forms on even spheres,” arXiv:1706.04574 [hep-th]

  58. [58]

    Entanglement Entropy, Relative Entropy and Duality,

    U. Moitra, R. M. Soni, and S. P. Trivedi, “Entanglement Entropy, Relative Entropy and Duality,” JHEP 08 (2019) 059, arXiv:1811.06986 [hep-th]

  59. [59]

    Partition functions of p-forms from Harish-Chandra characters,

    J. R. David and J. Mukherjee, “Partition functions of p-forms from Harish-Chandra characters,” JHEP 09 (2021) 094, arXiv:2105.03662 [hep-th]

  60. [60]

    Entanglement entropy and the boundary action of edge modes,

    J. Mukherjee, “Entanglement entropy and the boundary action of edge modes,” arXiv:2310.14690 [hep-th]

  61. [61]

    Note on entanglement and edge modes,

    J. S. Dowker, “Note on entanglement and edge modes,” arXiv:2406.15434 [hep-th]

  62. [62]

    Dynamical edge modes in p-form gauge theories,

    A. Ball and Y. T. A. Law, “Dynamical edge modes in p-form gauge theories,” JHEP 02 (2025) 182, arXiv:2411.02555 [hep-th]

  63. [63]

    Quasinormal Corrections to Near-Extremal Black Hole Thermodynamics,

    D. Kapec, Y. T. A. Law, and C. Toldo, “Quasinormal Corrections to Near-Extremal Black Hole Thermodynamics,” arXiv:2409.14928 [hep-th]

  64. [64]

    Black hole horizon edge partition functions,

    M. Grewal, Y. T. A. Law, and K. Parmentier, “Black hole horizon edge partition functions,” JHEP 06 (2023) 025, arXiv:2211.16644 [hep-th]

  65. [65]

    A compendium of sphere path integrals,

    Y. T. A. Law, “A compendium of sphere path integrals,” JHEP 12 (2021) 213, arXiv:2012.06345 [hep-th]

  66. [66]

    The phase of the gravitational path integral,

    X. Shi and G. J. Turiaci, “The phase of the gravitational path integral,” arXiv:2504.00900 [hep-th]

  67. [67]

    Physical instabilities and the phase of the Euclidean path integral,

    V. Ivo, J. Maldacena, and Z. Sun, “Physical instabilities and the phase of the Euclidean path integral,” arXiv:2504.00920 [hep-th] . 36

  68. [68]

    On some static solutions of Einstein’s gravitational field equations in a spherically symmetric case,

    H. Nariai, “On some static solutions of Einstein’s gravitational field equations in a spherically symmetric case,” Sci. Rep. Tohoku Univ. Eighth Ser. 34 (Jan., 1950) 160

  69. [69]

    Semiclassical Perdurance of de Sitter Space,

    P. H. Ginsparg and M. J. Perry, “Semiclassical Perdurance of de Sitter Space,” Nucl. Phys. B 222 (1983) 245–268

  70. [70]

    (Anti-)Evaporation of Schwarzschild-de Sitter Black Holes

    R. Bousso and S. W. Hawking, “(Anti)evaporation of Schwarzschild-de Sitter black holes,” Phys. Rev. D 57 (1998) 2436–2442, arXiv:hep-th/9709224

  71. [71]

    Eigenvalues and degeneracies for n-dimensional tensor spherical harmonics,

    M. A. Rubin and C. R. Ord´ onez, “Eigenvalues and degeneracies for n-dimensional tensor spherical harmonics,” Journal of mathematical physics 25 no. 10, (1984) 2888–2894

  72. [72]

    Static Patch Solipsism: Conformal Symmetry of the de Sitter Worldline

    D. Anninos, S. A. Hartnoll, and D. M. Hofman, “Static Patch Solipsism: Conformal Symmetry of the de Sitter Worldline,” Class. Quant. Grav. 29 (2012) 075002, arXiv:1109.4942 [hep-th]

  73. [73]

    Gravitational observatories,

    D. Anninos, D. A. Galante, and C. Maneerat, “Gravitational observatories,” JHEP 12 (2023) 024, arXiv:2310.08648 [hep-th]

  74. [74]

    Asymptotics of Quasi-normal Modes for Multi-horizon Black Holes

    L. Vanzo and S. Zerbini, “Asymptotics of quasinormal modes for multihorizon black holes,” Phys. Rev. D 70 (2004) 044030, arXiv:hep-th/0402103

  75. [75]

    Electromagnetic quasinormal modes of D-dimensional black holes II

    A. Lopez-Ortega, “Electromagnetic quasinormal modes of D-dimensional black holes. II.,” Gen. Rel. Grav. 40 (2008) 1379–1401, arXiv:0706.2933 [gr-qc]

  76. [76]

    The Dirac equation in D-dimensional spherically symmetric spacetimes

    A. Lopez-Ortega, “The Dirac equation in D-dimensional spherically symmetric spacetimes,” arXiv:0906.2754 [gr-qc]

  77. [77]

    Spin-2 Quasinormal Modes in Generalized Nariai Spacetimes,

    J. Venˆ ancio and C. Batista, “Spin-2 Quasinormal Modes in Generalized Nariai Spacetimes,” Phys. Rev. D 101 no. 8, (2020) 084037, arXiv:2002.08449 [gr-qc]

  78. [78]

    A master equation for gravitational perturbations of maximally symmetric black holes in higher dimensions

    H. Kodama and A. Ishibashi, “A Master equation for gravitational perturbations of maximally symmetric black holes in higher dimensions,” Prog. Theor. Phys. 110 (2003) 701–722, arXiv:hep-th/0305147

  79. [79]

    Borthwick, Spectral Theory of Infinite-Area Hyperbolic Surfaces, vol

    D. Borthwick, Spectral Theory of Infinite-Area Hyperbolic Surfaces, vol. 318 of Progress in Mathematics. Springer International Publishing. http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-33877-4

  80. [80]

    Higher spin de Sitter quasinormal modes,

    Z. Sun, “Higher spin de Sitter quasinormal modes,” arXiv:2010.09684 [hep-th]

Showing first 80 references.