Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 74 references

A Pan-STARRS Search for Distant Planets: Part 1

T0 review · 2 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that injecting synthetic detections into Pan-STARRS1 source catalogs, using per-exposure detection-efficiency and astrometric models, is essentially equivalent to injecting synthetic sources into the images and…

desk verdict A genuinely useful survey simulator for Pan-STARRS1, but the Planet Nine constraint depends on linking-model transfer that isn't actually demonstrated. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.02144 v1 pith:UPZBAZJI submitted 2025-06-02 astro-ph.EP astro-ph.IM

Matthew J. Holman , Kevin J. Napier , Matthew J. Payne , Jacob A. Kurlander This is my paper
classification astro-ph.EPastro-ph.IM
keywords KuiperbeltPlanetNinetrans-NeptunianobjectsPan-STARRS1surveysimulationinjection-recoverydetectionefficiencydwarfplanets
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that a well-characterized search of Pan-STARRS1 data can be carried out without reprocessing the images: synthetic moving objects are injected directly into the survey's source catalogs, using per-exposure detection-efficiency models and astrometric uncertainty models, and this is essentially equivalent to implanting and recovering synthetic sources in the images. On that basis the search recovered 692 solar system objects, 109 of them new to the minor-planet catalog, and it ranks third among Kuiper Belt surveys by raw detections even though it did not explicitly search inside 80 au. The search found no Planet Nine, but the same calibration supports a survey simulator that predicts 75,769 of 100,000 Planet Nine reference orbits would have been discovered, leaving the surviving parameter space concentrated in the galactic plane. The point of the paper is that the observational selection function of a messy, decades-long survey can be measured to high fidelity from the catalogs alone, making population statistics and planet searches possible without re-running the image pipeline.

What carries the argument

Two coupled mechanisms carry the argument. The first is catalog-level injection: for each of 708,554 exposures, a synthetic object's predicted position and magnitude are run through the focal-plane geometry, static masks, saturation-radius masking, a stationary-source catalog, and a per-detector detection-efficiency function, so that the probability of a recorded detection is reproduced without touching the images. The second is the linking model: a logistic regression that takes a detection-time histogram in 10-day bins and returns the probability that the tracklet-linking stage would have assembled those detections into a discovered orbit. The second mechanism is what makes population simulation cheap enough to run on 100,000 Planet Nine orbits.

What would settle it

Inject a sample of the Planet Nine reference orbits as synthetic sources directly into a subset of Pan-STARRS1 images, run the same photometric and linking pipeline, and compare the recovered fraction with the simulator's prediction of 75,769 of 100,000; disagreement at the level of the stated uncertainties would show that the catalog-level equivalence does not transfer to those orbits.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is a calibration method: by combining the Pan-STARRS Image Processing Pipeline's per-exposure detection-efficiency curves, an empirically modeled astrometric and photometric uncertainty distribution, focal-plane masks, and a catalog of stationary sources, the authors generate synthetic detections whose fate through the survey is statistically indistinguishable from injections at the image level. They then train a logistic-regression linking model on 10,000 isotropic control orbits, binned by detection epochs, and show that the model's predicted probabilities are well calibrated. Applied to the Planet Nine reference population, the simulator reports that 75,769 of 100,000 synthetic Planet Nines would have been linked and discovered; because none was found, that fraction of the reference parameter space is ruled out, and the remaining allowed orbits cluster toward the galactic plane.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the way the search links detections is the same for the random synthetic test objects used to calibrate it as for the specific, unusual orbits of the Planet Nine reference population, even though the paper's own calibration check was only run on another sample of the same random test objects.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If catalog-level injection is equivalent to image-level injection, then the recovery statistics for the 692 objects and the survey's completeness limits are trustworthy, making Pan-STARRS1 usable for population studies without massive reprocessing.
  • The survey's measured sensitivity extends over a wide range of heliocentric distances, rates, and directions of motion, so non-detection can be converted into quantitative upper limits on distant planet populations.
  • Because the search did not explicitly look inside 80 au, the 642 TNOs recovered include closer objects only as a byproduct, so a companion search at shorter distances is a direct next step.
  • The galactic-plane concentration of surviving Planet Nine parameter space identifies where future searches, including the paper's planned trackletless linking algorithm, should be concentrated.
  • The 23 detected dwarf planets, all previously known, set up new population limits on the largest TNOs.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The equivalence claim could be tested more directly by choosing a small set of exposures and running both injection routes, catalog-level versus image-level, on the same synthetic objects; the paper does not do this head-to-head comparison.
  • Because the logistic regression uses 10-day bins, it discards the exact timing of detections, so the simulator may be insensitive to cadence effects operating on shorter timescales; a recurrence-network variant was checked but not adopted.
  • The simulator's calibration on Planet Nine-like orbits remains an extrapolation, since the validation population was drawn from the same isotropic generator; applying the model to eccentric, distant, highly clustered reference orbits is the load-bearing transfer.
  • If the calibration transfers, the same technique could be used to reinterpret other archival surveys from their source catalogs without re-running their image pipelines.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper presents a search for distant solar system objects in 708,554 Pan-STARRS1 exposures using a catalog-level injection of a synthetic isotropic control population. The authors develop a tracklet-based linking algorithm that is sensitive to slow-moving objects, identify 692 real solar system objects (including 642 TNOs and 23 known dwarf planets such as Eris, Sedna, and Gonggong), and then build a survey simulator based on a logistic regression that maps binned detection counts to recovery probability. Applying this simulator to the Brown and Batygin (2021) Planet Nine reference population of 100,000 orbits, they predict that 75,769 would have been discovered and conclude that the remaining unconstrained parameter space is highly concentrated in the galactic plane.

Significance. If the method is sound, this represents a fast, high-fidelity alternative to image-level injection for Pan-STARRS1, enabling future population studies and Planet Nine constraints. The recovery of 23 known dwarf planets, including very distant objects like Eris and Sedna, provides strong independent support for the survey's sensitivity. The catalog-level injection is carefully calibrated using per-exposure IPP detection-efficiency information, and the linking model is well calibrated on held-out synthetic data. The main risk to the central Planet Nine constraint is that the linking model, trained on an isotropic control population with uniform apparent magnitudes, may not transfer to the Planet Nine reference population with a different magnitude and orbital distribution; the validation in Section 7.2 uses the same generator and cannot detect such a transfer failure.

major comments (2)
  1. [7.1, 7.2, 8] The linking model is a logistic regression on a vector of per-10-day-bin detection counts (Section 7.1). This input deliberately discards apparent magnitude, signal-to-noise ratio, and astrometric uncertainty, even though the linking algorithm's success depends on those quantities: tracklets must have residuals below 0.4 arcsec (Section 5.1), and fainter detections carry larger astrometric uncertainties through Eq. (E4). The control population has w-band magnitudes uniform in 19.5-23.5 (Section 3), whereas the Brown and Batygin (2021) reference population has a different distance, size, and color distribution and hence a different magnitude distribution. The validation in Section 7.2 uses a second sample from the same isotropic generator and is explicitly described as not statistically rigorous; it therefore cannot reveal a failure of the model to transfer to Planet Nine-like orbits. Because the predicted recovery fraction of 75,769/100,000 in Section 8 depends directly on this transfer, the headline constraint is not yet robustly established. The authors should either include magnitude/SNR/astrometric-quality features in the linking model, demonstrate empirically that linking probability for a fixed binned detection-count vector is independent of those quantities, or validate the simulator on a reference population with Planet Nine-like orbits and magnitudes.
  2. [8] The quantitative statement that the survey 'would have discovered 75,769/100,000 of the synthetic Planet Nine objects at 50% confidence' is ambiguous. It is not specified whether this number is the sum of per-object predicted probabilities, the number of objects with predicted probability exceeding 0.5, or the result of some other decision rule. The subsequent comparison to the 68,745/100,000 figure of Brown et al. (2024) and the construction of Figure 8 depend on this definition. Please state the exact rule used to count an object as 'discovered' or 'ruled out,' and report the distribution of predicted probabilities (or the expected number of discoveries) so that the constraint is reproducible.
minor comments (6)
  1. [2] In the second paragraph, 'Haleákala' should be 'Haleakalā' (or 'Haleakala').
  2. [Table 1] The caption contains a formatting error: 'T able 1' should read 'Table 1', and 'nf ovis' should be 'n_fov is'.
  3. [6] The contamination rate of 'of order 0.05%' for synthetic sources is quoted without specifying the denominator; please clarify whether this is the fraction of linked synthetic objects whose linkages are incorrect, or some other measure.
  4. [8, Figure 8] The criterion by which an object is 'not ruled out' (e.g., a predicted recovery probability below some threshold) is not defined. Please state the threshold and the color scale used in Figure 8.
  5. [7.1] The phrase 'we used a simple neural net to perform a logistic regression' is confusing; a logistic regression is not normally called a neural net. Suggest rewording to 'a logistic regression' or 'a single-layer neural network with no hidden units'.
  6. [Appendix E, Eq. (E4)] There is a typo: 'FHWM' should be 'FWHM', and the adjacent sentence 'The averageFHWM value' is missing a space.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity; the Planet Nine recovery fraction is a model prediction applied to an external reference population, not a refit of training labels.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained and not circular. The survey simulator is calibrated by injecting synthetic detections into Pan-STARRS1 source catalogs using per-exposure detection-efficiency and astrometric models (Sections 3-4 and Appendices D-E), and the linking model (Section 7.1) is a logistic regression trained on the detection-count vectors of those injected objects. The Planet Nine constraint (Section 8) is obtained by applying that trained model to the externally provided Brown & Batygin (2021)/Brown (2023) reference population, so the quoted 75,769/100,000 recovery fraction is a prediction for a new population rather than a refit of training labels. The 6-tracklet cut in Section 6 is chosen on the injected sample, and the Section 7.2 validation uses a second sample from the same generator and is explicitly described as 'not meant to be statistically rigorous'; these are honest limitations regarding generalization to Planet Nine-like orbits, but they are not circular because the Planet Nine input orbits, magnitudes, and cadences are not used to define the model or the threshold. Self-citations to Holman et al. (2018a,b), Kurlander et al. (2025), and ASSIST are methodological antecedents, not load-bearing justifications of the central claim.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The survey simulator's completeness and Planet Nine constraints rest primarily on the catalog-level injection equivalence, the IPP detection efficiency model, the fitted linkage predictor, and the Brown (2023) reference population. None of these are independently verified in this paper beyond internal validation and recovery of known dwarf planets.

free parameters (5)
  • Detection efficiency model parameters (fmax, background scale, t-distribution nu) = fit per chip per exposure, values not tabulated
    Appendix D: a three-parameter fit to IPP's own injected PSF recovery fractions; used to simulate synthetic detections and is central to catalog-level injection.
  • Astrometric uncertainty systematic term sigma_sys = not reported
    Appendix E, Eq. E4: fit to residuals of stationary catalog matches; used to generate realistic synthetic astrometry and assess orbit fits.
  • Logistic regression linking model weights = not reported
    Section 7.1: trained on 10-day binned detection counts of injected control objects; predicts link probability and is calibrated to within a few percent.
  • Minimum tracklets threshold = 6
    Section 6: linkages with fewer than 6 tracklets were discarded due to a flood of false positives; the threshold was chosen post hoc with contamination measured on the same injected sample.
  • Tracklet residual and magnitude thresholds = 0.4 arcsec, 1 mag
    Section 5.1: thresholds used to build tracklets; hand-chosen values that affect linking completeness and false positive rate.
assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption Detection efficiency measured from stationary PSF-injected sources at the image level applies to slowly moving solar system objects that are effectively stationary within an exposure.
    Section 4.4 and Appendix D: synthetic detections are accepted or rejected using this model; most TNOs move less than about 1.5 arcsec per hour, so they are nearly stationary within a 30 to 60 second exposure.
  • ad hoc to paper Injecting synthetic detections into catalogs with modeled astrometric and photometric scatter is equivalent to injecting sources into images and reprocessing them.
    Introduction and Section 1: this is the paper's foundational premise; no direct image-level injection comparison is performed because it is deemed infeasible.
  • domain assumption Ignoring dynamic bad-pixel masks has a negligible effect on survey completeness.
    Section 4.1: 'Later we assess the impact of ignoring the dynamic masks' but no assessment is reported in the text; static masks only are used for both real and synthetic detections.
  • standard math The ballistic approximation gz = -0.5 G Mt gamma^2 t'^2 with transverse perturbations neglected adequately models the motion of outer solar system bodies over about 9-year arcs.
    Section 5.2, equations 6 and 7: this approximation underlies the tracklet linking transformation and is valid for distant bodies whose orbital periods are much longer than the survey span.
  • domain assumption The Brown and Batygin (2021) and Brown (2023) Planet Nine reference population adequately represents the plausible parameter space for Planet Nine.
    Section 8: the Planet Nine constraint is computed only for this 100,000-object reference population; conclusions about remaining parameter space are conditional on it.
  • domain assumption The logistic regression linking model trained on the isotropic control population generalizes to the distant, clustered Planet Nine reference population.
    Section 7.2: validated only against a second population from the same generator; no validation on Planet Nine-like orbits or on real objects beyond the known dwarf planets.
  • domain assumption The control population's assumed magnitude distribution, H-G parameter G=0.15, and color relations are representative enough to calibrate the search.
    Section 3: apparent w magnitudes are drawn uniformly from 19.5 to 23.5, colors are from Bernardinelli et al. (2022), and the recovered fraction of known bright TNOs suggests reasonable coverage.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A Pan-STARRS Search for Distant Planets: Part 1." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/UPZBAZJI

@misc{pith2026250602144,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A Pan-STARRS Search for Distant Planets: Part 1},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/UPZBAZJI}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.02144}
}
read the original abstract

We present a search for distant planets in Pan-STARRS1. We calibrated our search by injecting an isotropic control population of synthetic detections into Pan-STARRS1 source catalogs, providing a high-fidelity alternative to injecting synthetic sources at the image level. We found that our method is sensitive to a wide range of distances, as well as all rates and directions of motion. We identified 692 solar system objects (109 of which are not yet listed in the Minor Planet Center's database), including 642 TNOs, 23 of which are dwarf planets. By raw number of detections, this makes our search the third most productive Kuiper Belt survey to date, in spite of the fact that we did not explicitly search for objects closer than 80 au. Although we did not find Planet Nine or any other planetary objects, we were able to show that the remaining parameter space for Planet Nine is highly concentrated in the galactic plane.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.02144 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The coverage of the Pan-STARRS1 data used in this search, from 2009 April 2 until 2017 November, shown in a Mollweide projection in equatorial coordinates (RA 0 deg is at the center of the plot, with RA increasing to the left). The colors encode, with a linear scale, the number of exposures that cover the region, assuming a circular field of view with a 1.6 deg angular radius, ignoring the ∼ 68% fill factor. The ten… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. shows the number of candidate detections per control object. Of the 10,000 objects in the isotropically distributed control sample, 8747 of them fall within the field of view of at least one exposure in the survey. This highlights the breadth of sky coverage of the Pan-STARRS1 surveys. Each object has a median of 154 candidate detections, thus there is the potential to discover even those that are bright enough to d… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. highlights the challenge of doing this correctly. It shows the sky-plane locations of the detections in a single GPC1 exposure and illustrates a number of features of the telescope, camera, and detectors. There are 60 detectors. The field is not aligned with RA and Dec; the Pan-STARRS1 telescope has an altitude-azimuth mount and a field rotator. Vignetting limits the field of view in the corners of the focal plane. … view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (6 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Of the 167,750 detections shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Sky positions of our synthetic objects relative to F51 on 8 December 2013 (approximately the midpoint of our data). The orientation is the same as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Calibration plot for our logistic regression model. The points on the x axis are binned values of the predicted probability of a vector being linked, while the y axis represents the fraction of the objects in that bin that were actually linked. The model, only deviates…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Sky positions of our second set of synthetic objects relative to F51 on 8 December 2013 (approximately the midpoint of our data). The orientation is the same as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: On-sky density of the objects in the Planet Nine reference population that have not yet been ruled out by our survey (top) and by Brown et al. (2024) (bottom). The orientation of each plot is the same as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: The detections in all the detectors shown in figure 3, folded to match the repeated cell pattern: x¯ = x % 608, y¯ = y % 610. The overabundance of detections at the borders of the cells is now even more evident. The horizontal and vertical lines indicate the area trimm…

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

74 extracted references · 20 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    2000, A&AS, 144, 363, doi: 10.1051/aas:2000214

    Alard, C. 2000, A&AS, 144, 363, doi: 10.1051/aas:2000214

    doi:10.1051/aas:2000214 2000

  2. [2]

    2019, SpiceyPy: Python wrapper for the NAIF C SPICE

    Annex, A., Carcich, B., Murakami, S.-y., et al. 2019, SpiceyPy: Python wrapper for the NAIF C SPICE

    work page 2019

  3. [3]

    http://ascl.net/1903.016

    Toolkit, Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1903.016. http://ascl.net/1903.016

    work page 1903

  4. [4]

    Bannister, M. T. 2020, in The Trans-Neptunian Solar System, ed. D. Prialnik, M. A. Barucci, & L. Young, 439–453, doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-816490-7.00020-5

    work page doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-816490-7.00020-5 2020

  5. [5]

    T., Alexandersen, M., Benecchi, S

    Bannister, M. T., Alexandersen, M., Benecchi, S. D., et al. 2016, AJ, 152, 212, doi: 10.3847/0004-6256/152/6/212

    doi:10.3847/0004-6256/152/6/212 2016

  6. [6]

    T., Gladman, B

    Bannister, M. T., Gladman, B. J., Kavelaars, J. J., et al. 2018, ApJS, 236, 18, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/aab77a

    doi:10.3847/1538-4365/aab77a 2018

  7. [7]

    Batygin, K., & Brown, M. E. 2016, AJ, 151, 22, doi: 10.3847/0004-6256/151/2/22

    doi:10.3847/0004-6256/151/2/22 2016

  8. [8]

    Bentley, J. L. 1975, Commun. ACM, 18, 509, doi: 10.1145/361002.361007

    arXiv 1975

Show all 74 references
  1. [9]

    H., Bernstein, G

    Bernardinelli, P. H., Bernstein, G. M., Sako, M., et al. 2020, ApJS, 247, 32, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ab6bd8 —. 2022, ApJS, 258, 41, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ac3914

    2020 doi

  2. [10]

    2000, AJ, 120, 3323, doi: 10.1086/316868

    Bernstein, G., & Khushalani, B. 2000, AJ, 120, 3323, doi: 10.1086/316868

    2000 doi

  3. [11]

    M., Trilling, D

    Bernstein, G. M., Trilling, D. E., Allen, R. L., et al. 2004, AJ, 128, 1364, doi: 10.1086/422919

    2004 doi

  4. [12]

    1989, in Asteroids II, ed

    Bowell, E., Hapke, B., Domingue, D., et al. 1989, in Asteroids II, ed. R. P. Binzel, T. Gehrels, & M. S. Matthews, 524–556

    1989

  5. [13]

    2023, Planet Nine reference population, Version 3.0, CaltechDATA, doi: 10.22002/8fjad-x7y61

    Brown, M. 2023, Planet Nine reference population, Version 3.0, CaltechDATA, doi: 10.22002/8fjad-x7y61

    2023 doi

  6. [14]

    E., & Batygin, K

    Brown, M. E., & Batygin, K. 2016, ArXiv e-prints. https://arxiv.org/abs/1603.05712 —. 2021, AJ, 162, 219, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ac2056

    2016 arXiv

  7. [15]

    E., Holman, M

    Brown, M. E., Holman, M. J., & Batygin, K. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2401.17977, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2401.17977

    2024 doi arXiv

  8. [16]

    E., Trujillo, C., & Rabinowitz, D

    Brown, M. E., Trujillo, C., & Rabinowitz, D. 2004, ApJ, 617, 645, doi: 10.1086/422095

    2004 doi

  9. [17]

    E., Trujillo, C

    Brown, M. E., Trujillo, C. A., & Rabinowitz, D. L. 2005, ApJL, 635, L97, doi: 10.1086/499336

    2005 doi

  10. [18]

    C., Magnier, E

    Chambers, K. C., Magnier, E. A., Metcalfe, N., et al. 2016, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1612.05560. https://arxiv.org/abs/1612.05560

    2016 arXiv

  11. [19]

    W., Holman, M

    Chen, Y.-T., Lin, H. W., Holman, M. J., et al. 2016, ApJL, 827, L24, doi: 10.3847/2041-8205/827/2/L24

    2016 doi

  12. [20]

    2007, Protostars and Planets V, 895

    Chiang, E., Lithwick, Y., Murray-Clay, R., et al. 2007, Protostars and Planets V, 895

    2007

  13. [21]

    2013, PASP, 125, 357, doi: 10.1086/670337

    Denneau, L., Jedicke, R., Grav, T., et al. 2013, PASP, 125, 357, doi: 10.1086/670337

    2013 doi

  14. [22]

    P., Schlafly, E

    Finkbeiner, D. P., Schlafly, E. F., Schlegel, D. J., et al. 2016, ApJ, 822, 66, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/822/2/66

    2016 doi

  15. [23]

    W., Jennings, R

    Gerdes, D. W., Jennings, R. J., Bernstein, G. M., et al. 2016, AJ, 151, 39, doi: 10.3847/0004-6256/151/2/39

    2016 doi

  16. [24]

    2002, Icarus, 157, 269, doi: 10.1006/icar.2002.6860

    Gladman, B., Holman, M., Grav, T., et al. 2002, Icarus, 157, 269, doi: 10.1006/icar.2002.6860

    2002

  17. [25]

    J., Petit, J.-M., et al

    Gladman, B., Kavelaars, J. J., Petit, J.-M., et al. 2001, AJ, 122, 1051, doi: 10.1086/322080

    2001 doi

  18. [26]

    2021, ARA&A, 59, 203, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-120920-010005 Górski, K

    Gladman, B., & Volk, K. 2021, ARA&A, 59, 203, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-120920-010005 Górski, K. M., Hivon, E., Banday, A. J., et al. 2005, ApJ, 622, 759, doi: 10.1086/427976

    2021 doi

  19. [27]

    2023, in AAS/Division for Planetary Sciences Meeting Abstracts, Vol

    Heinze, A., Eggl, S., & Juric, M. 2023, in AAS/Division for Planetary Sciences Meeting Abstracts, Vol. 55, AAS/Division for Planetary Sciences Meeting Abstracts #55, 405.03

    2023

  20. [28]

    2022, in AAS/Division for Planetary Sciences Meeting Abstracts, Vol

    Heinze, A., Eggl, S., Juric, M., et al. 2022, in AAS/Division for Planetary Sciences Meeting Abstracts, Vol. 54, AAS/Division for Planetary Sciences Meeting Abstracts, 504.04

    2022

  21. [29]

    W., Kaiser, N., Aussel, H., et al

    Hodapp, K. W., Kaiser, N., Aussel, H., et al. 2004, Astronomische Nachrichten, 325, 636, doi: 10.1002/asna.200410300

    2004 doi

  22. [30]

    J., Akmal, A., Farnocchia, D., et al

    Holman, M. J., Akmal, A., Farnocchia, D., et al. 2023, PSJ, 4, 69, doi: 10.3847/PSJ/acc9a9

    2023 doi

  23. [31]

    2018a, AJ, 156, 135, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aad69a

    Kuindersma, S. 2018a, AJ, 156, 135, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aad69a

    doi

  24. [32]

    J., Payne, M

    Holman, M. J., Payne, M. J., & Pál, A. 2019, Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society, 3, 160, doi: 10.3847/2515-5172/ab4ea6

    2019 doi

  25. [33]

    J., Kavelaars, J

    Holman, M. J., Kavelaars, J. J., Grav, T., et al. 2004, Nature, 430, 865, doi: 10.1038/nature02832

    2004 doi

  26. [34]

    J., Payne, M

    Holman, M. J., Payne, M. J., Fraser, W., et al. 2018b, ApJL, 855, L6, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aaadb3

    doi

  27. [35]

    2022, ApJL, 938, L23, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac9480

    Huang, Y., Gladman, B., Beaudoin, M., & Zhang, K. 2022, ApJL, 938, L23, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac9480

    2022 doi

  28. [36]

    P., Richards, G

    Jester, S., Schneider, D. P., Richards, G. T., et al. 2005, AJ, 130, 873, doi: 10.1086/432466 Pan-STARRS1 Planet Search 23

    2005 doi

  29. [37]

    L., Jurić, M., & Ivezić, Ž

    Jones, R. L., Jurić, M., & Ivezić, Ž. 2016, in Asteroids: New

    2016

  30. [38]

    Observations, New Models, ed. S. R. Chesley, A. Morbidelli, R. Jedicke, & D. Farnocchia, Vol. 318, 282–292, doi: 10.1017/S1743921315008510

    doi

  31. [39]

    2010, in Proc

    Kaiser, N., Burgett, W., Chambers, K., et al. 2010, in Proc. SPIE, Vol. 7733, Ground-based and Airborne Telescopes III, 77330E, doi: 10.1117/12.859188

    2010 doi

  32. [40]

    2020, in The Trans-Neptunian Solar System, ed

    Shankman, C. 2020, in The Trans-Neptunian Solar System, ed. D. Prialnik, M. A. Barucci, & L. Young, 61–77, doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-816490-7.00003-5

    2020 doi

  33. [41]

    C., Lin, H

    Khain, T., Becker, J. C., Lin, H. W., et al. 2020, AJ, 159, 133, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ab7002

    2020 doi

  34. [42]

    2007, Icarus, 189, 151, doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2007.01.008

    Kubica, J., Denneau, L., Grav, T., et al. 2007, Icarus, 189, 151, doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2007.01.008

    2007 doi

  35. [43]

    A., Holman, M

    Kurlander, J. A., Holman, M. J., Bernardinelli, P. H., et al. 2025, AJ, 169, 73, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ad9a58

    2025 doi

  36. [44]

    M., Kavelaars, J

    Lawler, S. M., Kavelaars, J. J., Alexandersen, M., et al. 2018, Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences, 5, 14, doi: 10.3389/fspas.2018.00014

    2018

  37. [45]

    W., Chen, Y.-T., Holman, M

    Lin, H. W., Chen, Y.-T., Holman, M. J., et al. 2016, AJ, 152, 147, doi: 10.3847/0004-6256/152/5/147

    2016 doi

  38. [46]

    S., & Ito, T

    Lykawka, P. S., & Ito, T. 2023, AJ, 166, 118, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aceaf0

    2023 doi

  39. [47]

    S., & Mukai, T

    Lykawka, P. S., & Mukai, T. 2007, Icarus, 189, 213, doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2007.01.001 —. 2008, AJ, 135, 1161, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/135/4/1161

    2007 doi

  40. [48]

    A., Schlafly, E., Finkbeiner, D., et al

    Magnier, E. A., Schlafly, E., Finkbeiner, D., et al. 2013, ApJS, 205, 20, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/205/2/20

    2013 doi

  41. [49]

    A., Schlafly, E

    Magnier, E. A., Schlafly, E. F., Finkbeiner, D. P., et al. 2020a, ApJS, 251, 6, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/abb82a

    doi

  42. [50]

    A., Sweeney, W

    Magnier, E. A., Sweeney, W. E., Chambers, K. C., et al. 2020b, ApJS, 251, 5, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/abb82c

    doi

  43. [51]

    A., Chambers, K

    Magnier, E. A., Chambers, K. C., Flewelling, H. A., et al. 2020c, ApJS, 251, 3, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/abb829

    doi

  44. [52]

    Maneewongvatana, S., & Mount, D. M. 1999, arXiv e-prints, cs/9901013. https://arxiv.org/abs/cs/9901013

    1999 arXiv

  45. [53]

    J., Lin, H

    Napier, K. J., Lin, H. W., Gerdes, D. W., et al. 2024, PSJ, 5, 50, doi: 10.3847/PSJ/ad1528

    2024 doi

  46. [54]

    L., Isani, S., et al

    Onaka, P., Tonry, J. L., Isani, S., et al. 2008, in Proc. SPIE, Vol. 7014, Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy II, 70140D, doi: 10.1117/12.788093

    2008 doi

  47. [55]

    S., Folkner, W

    Park, R. S., Folkner, W. M., Williams, J. G., & Boggs, D. H. 2021, AJ, 161, 105, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/abd414

    2021 doi

  48. [56]

    J., Gladman, B

    Petit, J.-M., Holman, M. J., Gladman, B. J., et al. 2006, MNRAS, 365, 429, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09661.x

    2006

  49. [57]

    J., Gladman, B

    Petit, J.-M., Kavelaars, J. J., Gladman, B. J., et al. 2011, AJ, 142, 131, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/142/4/131

    2011 doi

  50. [58]

    2012, AJ, 144, 140, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/144/5/140

    Tourtellotte, S. 2012, AJ, 144, 140, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/144/5/140

    2012 doi

  51. [59]

    F., Finkbeiner, D

    Schlafly, E. F., Finkbeiner, D. P., Jurić, M., et al. 2012, ApJ, 756, 158, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/756/2/158

    2012 doi

  52. [60]

    2010, ApJ, 720, 1691, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/720/2/1691

    Ragozzine, D. 2010, ApJ, 720, 1691, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/720/2/1691

    2010 doi

  53. [61]

    S., & Trujillo, C

    Sheppard, S. S., & Trujillo, C. 2016, AJ, 152, 221, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/152/6/221

    2016 doi

  54. [62]

    2018, AJ, 155, 75, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aaa19b

    Silsbee, K., & Tremaine, S. 2018, AJ, 155, 75, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aaa19b

    2018 doi

  55. [63]

    Stern, S. A. 1991, Icarus, 90, 271, doi: 10.1016/0019-1035(91)90106-4

    1991 doi

  56. [64]

    2009, in Advanced Maui Optical and Space Surveillance Technologies Conference, E40

    Tonry, J., & Onaka, P. 2009, in Advanced Maui Optical and Space Surveillance Technologies Conference, E40

    2009

  57. [65]

    L., Stubbs, C

    Tonry, J. L., Stubbs, C. W., Lykke, K. R., et al. 2012a, ApJ, 750, 99, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/750/2/99 —. 2012b, ApJ, 750, 99, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/750/2/99

    doi

  58. [66]

    L., Stubbs, C

    Tonry, J. L., Stubbs, C. W., Kilic, M., et al. 2012c, ApJ, 745, 42, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/745/1/42

    doi

  59. [67]

    L., Denneau, L., Flewelling, H., et al

    Tonry, J. L., Denneau, L., Flewelling, H., et al. 2018, ApJ, 867, 105, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aae386

    2018 doi

  60. [68]

    E., Bellm, E

    Trilling, D. E., Bellm, E. C., & Malhotra, R. 2018, AJ, 155, 243, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aabfc0

    2018 doi

  61. [69]

    E., Gerdes, D

    Trilling, D. E., Gerdes, D. W., Jurić, M., et al. 2024, AJ, 167, 132, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ad1529

    2024 doi

  62. [70]

    A., Jewitt, D

    Trujillo, C. A., Jewitt, D. C., & Luu, J. X. 2001, AJ, 122, 457, doi: 10.1086/321117

    2001 doi

  63. [71]

    A., & Sheppard, S

    Trujillo, C. A., & Sheppard, S. S. 2014, Nature, 507, 471, doi: 10.1038/nature13156

    2014 doi

  64. [72]

    2017, AJ, 154, 62, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aa79ff

    Volk, K., & Malhotra, R. 2017, AJ, 154, 62, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aa79ff

    2017 doi

  65. [73]

    J., Lilly, E., Chastel, S., et al

    Weryk, R. J., Lilly, E., Chastel, S., et al. 2016, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1607.04895. https://arxiv.org/abs/1607.04895

    2016 arXiv

  66. [74]

    2019, Journal of Open Source Software, 4, 1298, doi: 10.21105/joss.01298

    Zonca, A., Singer, L., Lenz, D., et al. 2019, Journal of Open Source Software, 4, 1298, doi: 10.21105/joss.01298

    2019 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.