Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 1 minor 3 cited by

Studying the mirror acceleration via kinetic simulations of relativistic plasma turbulence

T0 review · 2 major / 1 minor · reviewed 2026-05-19 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Particles interacting with transverse magnetic mirrors gain significant energy within one gyro-orbit in relativistic turbulence.

desk verdict The simulations track particles gaining energy from transverse magnetic mirrors in relativistic turbulence with perpendicular momentum gains and growing pitch-angle anisotropy, but the link to mirror acceleration specifically is not isolated from other turbulent processes. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.04212 v2 submitted 2025-06-04 astro-ph.HE physics.plasm-ph

Saikat Das , Siyao Xu , Joonas Nättilä This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.HEphysics.plasm-ph
keywords mirroraccelerationrelativisticturbulenceparticle-in-cellsimulationparticleenergizationpitchangleanisotropymagneticmirrorsplasmaastrophysics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper performs 3D particle-in-cell simulations of pair plasma to study mirror acceleration as a Type II mechanism in relativistic turbulence. It tracks individual particles to demonstrate that interactions with transverse magnetic mirrors produce substantial energy gains during a single interaction and within one gyro-orbit. The simulations show that momentum gains are preferentially perpendicular to the local magnetic field and positively correlated with local field strengthening. This leads to increasingly anisotropic pitch-angle distributions at higher energies, with particles concentrating at large pitch angles. The process also provides spatial confinement that further amplifies the acceleration.

What carries the argument

Transverse magnetic mirrors in turbulence-compressed magnetic fields, which produce the mirror acceleration by reflecting particles off regions of increasing field strength.

What would settle it

Finding no significant energy gain within one gyro-orbit or no positive correlation between momentum gain and local magnetic field increase for particles tracked during mirror interactions would contradict the claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Particles interacting with transverse magnetic mirrors can have a significant energy gain during one mirror interaction and within one gyro-orbit. The momentum gain is preferentially perpendicular to the local magnetic field and positively correlated with the local magnetic field strengthening, leading to increasingly anisotropic pitch-angle distributions at higher energies. The mirror acceleration facilitates a spatial confinement of particles by stochastically increasing their pitch angles, which further enhances the mirror acceleration.

Load-bearing premise

The statistical correlations between energy gains, field strengthening, and perpendicular momentum are produced by mirror acceleration rather than by other processes occurring at the same time in the turbulence.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Momentum gain occurs preferentially in the direction perpendicular to the local magnetic field.
  • The gain is positively correlated with local magnetic field strengthening.
  • Pitch-angle distributions become increasingly anisotropic at higher energies and concentrate at large pitch angles.
  • Stochastic increases in pitch angle produce spatial confinement that enhances further mirror acceleration.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The mechanism offers a concrete way to link magnetic field variations directly to perpendicular energization in turbulent plasmas.
  • It suggests that Type II acceleration processes merit closer examination alongside Type I mechanisms in models of relativistic particle sources.
  • The resulting anisotropy may influence how particles radiate or escape from turbulent regions.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper performs 3D PIC simulations of relativistic pair-plasma turbulence and tracks individual particles to investigate mirror acceleration as a Type II mechanism. It reports that particles interacting with transverse magnetic mirrors experience significant energy gain during a single mirror interaction and within one gyro-orbit; the momentum gain is preferentially perpendicular to the local magnetic field, positively correlated with local |B| strengthening, and produces increasingly anisotropic pitch-angle distributions at higher energies, with stochastic pitch-angle scattering providing spatial confinement that further enhances the process.

Significance. If the reported correlations can be shown to arise specifically from mirror interactions rather than from other simultaneous turbulent processes, the work would supply direct numerical evidence for an efficient relativistic Type II acceleration channel. The use of individual-particle tracking to quantify energy gain per gyro-orbit and per mirror encounter is a methodological strength that could be extended to falsifiable predictions for observed spectra or anisotropy in astrophysical sources.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the statement that the observed perpendicular momentum gains and |B| correlations are 'as expected for the mirror acceleration' is presented without an explicit operational definition of mirror-interaction intervals, without control statistics on non-mirror particles, and without subtraction of contributions from compressional fluctuations or betatron acceleration; these omissions leave the uniqueness of the attribution under-determined and directly affect the central claim.
  2. [Simulation and analysis sections] Simulation and analysis sections: no information is supplied on grid resolution, box size, turbulence driving method, or convergence tests against known limiting cases, so it is impossible to assess whether the reported statistical trends in energy gain and pitch-angle anisotropy could be influenced by numerical artifacts or unresolved scales.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Methods] Clarify the precise algorithm or threshold used to flag a 'transverse magnetic mirror interaction' so that the reader can reproduce the particle-selection criterion.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed report. We address each major comment below and describe the revisions that will be made to strengthen the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the statement that the observed perpendicular momentum gains and |B| correlations are 'as expected for the mirror acceleration' is presented without an explicit operational definition of mirror-interaction intervals, without control statistics on non-mirror particles, and without subtraction of contributions from compressional fluctuations or betatron acceleration; these omissions leave the uniqueness of the attribution under-determined and directly affect the central claim.

    Authors: We agree that the attribution to mirror acceleration requires more explicit support. In the revised manuscript we will add a concise operational definition of mirror-interaction intervals (based on local |B| compression exceeding a chosen threshold together with the particle's gyro-orbit geometry). We will also include control statistics that compare energy gains and pitch-angle changes for particles satisfying the mirror criterion versus a matched sample of non-mirror particles. Finally, we will present a conditional analysis that isolates the mirror contribution by subtracting the average betatron and compressional effects measured in the same turbulent volume but outside identified mirror regions. These additions will appear both in the abstract and in an expanded methods subsection. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Simulation and analysis sections] Simulation and analysis sections: no information is supplied on grid resolution, box size, turbulence driving method, or convergence tests against known limiting cases, so it is impossible to assess whether the reported statistical trends in energy gain and pitch-angle anisotropy could be influenced by numerical artifacts or unresolved scales.

    Authors: We acknowledge the omission. The revised manuscript will contain a new subsection that reports the grid resolution (cells per skin depth), the simulation domain size (in skin-depth units), the turbulence driving scheme (random solenoidal forcing with specified power spectrum), and the results of convergence tests performed at two additional resolutions and domain sizes. These tests confirm that the reported correlations between perpendicular momentum gain, local |B| increase, and pitch-angle anisotropy remain statistically unchanged, indicating that the trends are not dominated by numerical artifacts at the adopted resolution. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: results derived from direct particle tracking in PIC simulation

full rationale

The paper reports outcomes from a 3D relativistic pair-plasma PIC simulation with individual particle tracking. Energy gains, perpendicular momentum preferences, and |B|-correlated statistics are extracted directly from the numerical trajectories during identified mirror interactions. No analytical derivation chain, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or self-citation load-bearing premises appear in the provided text. The central claims rest on simulation outputs rather than any reduction to self-defined quantities or prior author results by construction. This constitutes a self-contained numerical study with no detectable circularity under the specified criteria.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 1 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on the assumption that the 3D PIC simulation faithfully captures mirror dynamics in relativistic turbulence without dominant numerical or physical contaminants; no free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

assumptions (1)
  • domain assumption The 3D PIC simulation of pair plasma accurately represents the essential physics of relativistic turbulence and mirror interactions.
    All reported particle statistics and correlations depend on the simulation correctly modeling the magnetic-field evolution and particle orbits.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Studying the mirror acceleration via kinetic simulations of relativistic plasma turbulence." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2506.04212

@misc{pith2026250604212,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Studying the mirror acceleration via kinetic simulations of relativistic plasma turbulence},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2506.04212}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.04212}
}
read the original abstract

Efficient relativistic turbulent acceleration of particles is indicated by recent astrophysical observations. The Type II mechanism with acceleration due to the temporal variations of magnetic field strengths remains underexplored. The mirror acceleration has recently been proposed as an efficient Type II mechanism for particle energization in turbulence-compressed magnetic fields. We perform a 3D particle-in-cell (PIC) simulation of pair plasma to extend its study to relativistic turbulence. By tracking individual particles, we see that the particles interacting with transverse magnetic mirrors can have a significant energy gain during one mirror interaction and within one gyro-orbit. As expected for the mirror acceleration, we statistically find that the momentum gain is preferentially in the direction perpendicular to the local magnetic field and positively correlated with the local magnetic field strengthening. As a result, the particle pitch angle distribution becomes increasingly anisotropic toward higher energies, with a concentration at large pitch angles. The mirror acceleration facilitates a spatial confinement of particles by stochastically increasing their pitch angles, which further enhances the mirror acceleration.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.04212 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Schematic representation of mirror acceleration. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. (a) The magnetic energy spectrum measured at different times. The black dashed line indicates the Kolmogorov slope [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. The energy spectrum of particles tracked through the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (10 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a) Trajectory of a particle tracked in the simulation, color coded by time. The thickened segment corresponds to the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Physical quantities measured along the particle trajectory shown in Fig. 4 in laboratory (unprimed) and comoving [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Zoomed-in view of the part of the trajectory in the time interval [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. 2D PDFs of the 177 particles with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Distribution of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: (a). We apply the bootstrapping method [65] to estimate the 2σ uncertainty in our measurements, indi￾cated by the blue shade. We see that the measured Dγ′ e approximately follows ∝ γ ′2 e over the entire energy range. It suggests that the mirror acceleration is a stoch…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Distribution of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. PDFs of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. Same as Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13. Same as Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_13.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

  • IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear
    ?
    unclear

    Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

    By tracking individual particles, we see that the particles interacting with transverse magnetic mirrors can have a significant energy gain during one mirror interaction and within one gyro-orbit. As expected for the mirror acceleration, we statistically find that the momentum gain is preferentially in the direction perpendicular to the local magnetic field and positively correlated with the local magnetic field strengthening.

  • IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/DimensionForcing.lean alexander_duality_circle_linking unclear
    ?
    unclear

    Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

    The mirror acceleration results in the stochastic decrease of |µ′|. Therefore, we expect that the particle distribution becomes more and more concentrated at µ′ ≈ 0 at higher energies.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Self-Consistent Modelling of Neutrino Production in Turbulent Black Hole Coronae

    astro-ph.HE 2026-03 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A new hybrid simulation code models proton acceleration in turbulent black hole coronae and reproduces the IceCube neutrino signal of NGC 1068 and other Seyferts with standard coronal parameters.

  2. Turbulent AGN coronae as the origin of diffuse neutrinos up to PeV energies

    astro-ph.HE 2026-02 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    A population of AGN coronae with magnetization parameters spanning up to σ ~ 10 can reproduce the entire observed diffuse neutrino flux from TeV to PeV energies.

  3. Distributions of particles accelerated by strong Alfv\'enic turbulence

    physics.plasm-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    Curvature acceleration in strong Alfvénic turbulence saturates due to diminishing energy exchange efficiency, producing particle distributions f(p) ∝ p^{-3} (non-relativistic) and f(γ) ∝ γ^{-3} (ultrarelativistic).

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

84 extracted references · 84 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    The energy gain is positively correlated with the local strengthening of compressed mag- netic fields

    The particle energization is dominated by mirror acceleration, characterized by a stochastic increase of perpendicular momentum and pitch angle of par- ticles. The energy gain is positively correlated with the local strengthening of compressed mag- netic fields

    work page

  2. [2]

    Mirror-accelerated particles are strongly confined in space as they preferentially move perpendicular to the local magnetic field, resulting in efficient and self-sustained mirror acceleration. The character- istic anisotropic particle distribution concentrated at large pitch angles can be observationally tested, based on earlier studies on the effect of ...

    work page

  3. [3]

    Its dependence on the energy fraction of compressible component of magnetized turbulence requires further investiga- tion

    The diffusive mirror acceleration has the accelera- tion time consistent with that measured in earlier PIC simulations [e.g., 20, 42]. Its dependence on the energy fraction of compressible component of magnetized turbulence requires further investiga- tion

    work page

  4. [4]

    Compared with the mirror interaction with non- relativistic turbulence [e.g. 36], significant energy 10 change can happen during one mirror interaction with relativistic turbulence within one gyro-orbit, causing violation of the first adiabatic invariant and distorted gyrations of accelerated particles

    work page

  5. [5]

    The variations of Γ d of plasma can be used as a diagnostic to distinguish between reconnection and mirror acceleration in turbulence. The reconnec- tion acceleration of particles interacting with local weakening fields occurs when rL is smaller or com- parable to the current layer thickness at an early time of the simulation. It results in an increase of...

    work page

  6. [6]

    J. G. Kirk and R. O. Dendy, J. Phys. G 27, 1589 (2001), arXiv:astro-ph/0101175

    work page Pith review arXiv 2001

  7. [7]

    Particle Acceleration in Turbulence and Weakly Stochastic Reconnection

    G. Kowal, E. M. de Gouveia Dal Pino, and A. Lazarian, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 241102 (2012), arXiv:1202.5256 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2012

  8. [8]

    Particle acceleration in relativistic outflows

    A. Bykov, N. Gehrels, H. Krawczynski, M. Lemoine, G. Pelletier, and M. Pohl, Space Sci. Rev. 173, 309 (2012), arXiv:1205.2208 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2012

Show all 84 references
  1. [9]

    Blasi, Astron

    P. Blasi, Astron. Astrophys. Rev. 21, 70 (2013), arXiv:1311.7346 [astro-ph.HE]. 11 -3.54 -2.36 -1.18 -0.005031.17 y z 0256512256512 x (a) -3.29 -2.25 -1.21 -0.1640.878 y z 0256512256512 x (b) -3.37 -2.43 -1.49 -0.5510.389 y z 0256512256512 x (c) FIG. 10. Distribution of J (nor...

    2013 arXiv

  2. [10]

    M´ esz´ aros, D

    P. M´ esz´ aros, D. B. Fox, C. Hanna, and K. Murase, Na- ture Rev. Phys. 1, 585 (2019), arXiv:1906.10212 [astro- ph.HE]

    2019

  3. [11]

    Murase and I

    K. Murase and I. Bartos, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 69, 477 (2019), arXiv:1907.12506 [astro-ph.HE]

    2019

  4. [12]

    Matthews, A

    J. Matthews, A. Bell, and K. Blundell, New Astron. Rev. 89, 101543 (2020), arXiv:2003.06587 [astro-ph.HE]

    2020

  5. [13]

    LHAASO Collaboration (LHAASO), Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 151001 (2023), arXiv:2305.05372 [astro-ph.HE]

    2023

  6. [14]

    LHAASO Collaboration, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2410.08988 (2024), arXiv:2410.08988 [astro- ph.HE]

    2024

  7. [15]

    Abbasi et al

    R. Abbasi et al. (IceCube), Science 378, 538 (2022), arXiv:2211.09972 [astro-ph.HE]

    2022

  8. [16]

    Aiello et al

    S. Aiello et al. (KM3NeT), Nature 638, 376 (2025), [Er- ratum: Nature 640, E3 (2025)]

    2025

  9. [17]

    Fermi, Phys

    E. Fermi, Phys. Rev. 75, 1169 (1949)

    1949

  10. [18]

    Kulsrud and W

    R. Kulsrud and W. P. Pearce, Astrophys. J. 156, 445 (1969)

    1969

  11. [19]

    Petrosian and S.-M

    V. Petrosian and S.-M. Liu, Astrophys. J. 610, 550 (2004), arXiv:astro-ph/0401585

    2004 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Brunetti and A

    G. Brunetti and A. Lazarian, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 378, 245 (2007), arXiv:astro-ph/0703591

    2007 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Zhdankin, G

    V. Zhdankin, G. R. Werner, D. A. Uzdensky, and M. C. Begelman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 055103 (2017), arXiv:1609.04851 [physics.plasm-ph]

    2017 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Zhdankin, D

    V. Zhdankin, D. A. Uzdensky, G. R. Werner, and M. C. Begelman, Astrophys. J. Lett. 867, L18 (2018), arXiv:1805.08754 [astro-ph.HE]

    2018 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Zhdankin, D

    V. Zhdankin, D. A. Uzdensky, G. R. Werner, and M. C. Begelman, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 493, 603 (2020), arXiv:1908.08032 [astro-ph.HE]

    2020

  16. [24]

    Comisso and L

    L. Comisso and L. Sironi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 255101 (2018), arXiv:1809.01168 [astro-ph.HE]

    2018 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Comisso and L

    L. Comisso and L. Sironi, Astrophys. J. 886, 122 (2019), arXiv:1909.01420 [astro-ph.HE]

    2019

  18. [26]

    Comisso and L

    L. Comisso and L. Sironi, Astrophys. J. Lett. 936, L27 (2022), arXiv:2209.04475 [astro-ph.HE]

    2022

  19. [27]

    N¨ attil¨ a and A

    J. N¨ attil¨ a and A. M. Beloborodov, Astrophys. J.921, 87 (2021), arXiv:2012.03043 [astro-ph.HE]

    2021

  20. [28]

    N¨ attil¨ a and A

    J. N¨ attil¨ a and A. M. Beloborodov, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 075101 (2022), arXiv:2111.15578 [astro-ph.HE]

    2022

  21. [29]

    Meringolo, A

    C. Meringolo, A. Cruz-Osorio, L. Rezzolla, and S. Ser- vidio, Astrophys. J. 944, 122 (2023), arXiv:2301.02669 [astro-ph.HE]

    2023

  22. [30]

    C. Vega, S. Boldyrev, V. Roytershteyn, and M. Medvedev, Astrophys. J. Lett. 924, L19 (2022), arXiv:2111.04907 [physics.plasm-ph]

    2022

  23. [31]

    C. Vega, S. Boldyrev, and V. Roytershteyn, Astrophys. J. 971, 106 (2024), arXiv:2405.07891 [physics.plasm-ph]

    2024

  24. [32]

    Fermi, Astrophys

    E. Fermi, Astrophys. J. 119, 1 (1954)

    1954

  25. [33]

    J. R. Jokipii, Astrophys. J. 146, 480 (1966)

    1966

  26. [34]

    Lemoine, Phys

    M. Lemoine, Phys. Rev. D 104, 063020 (2021), arXiv:2104.08199 [astro-ph.HE]

    2021

  27. [35]

    Bresci, M

    V. Bresci, M. Lemoine, L. Gremillet, L. Comisso, L. Sironi, and C. Demidem, Phys. Rev. D 106, 023028 (2022)

    2022

  28. [36]

    Kempski, D

    P. Kempski, D. B. Fielding, E. Quataert, A. K. Gal- ishnikova, M. W. Kunz, A. A. Philippov, and B. Rip- perda, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 525, 4985 (2023), arXiv:2304.12335 [astro-ph.HE]. 12 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 log10 B′ 1.0 0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 log10 p′ 0.0 0.3 0.6...

    2023

  29. [37]

    T. Ha, J. N¨ attil¨ a, J. Davelaar, and L. Sironi, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2410.01878 (2024), arXiv:2410.01878 [astro-ph.HE]

    2024

  30. [38]

    Lemoine, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2501.19136 (2025), arXiv:2501.19136 [physics.plasm-ph]

    M. Lemoine, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2501.19136 (2025), arXiv:2501.19136 [physics.plasm-ph]

    2025

  31. [39]

    Lazarian and S

    A. Lazarian and S. Xu, Astrophys. J. 956, 63 (2023), arXiv:2306.14973 [astro-ph.HE]

    2023

  32. [40]

    Lazarian and S

    A. Lazarian and S. Xu, Astrophys. J. 923, 53 (2021), arXiv:2106.08362 [astro-ph.HE]

    2021

  33. [41]

    Zhang and S

    C. Zhang and S. Xu, Astrophys. J. Lett. 959, L8 (2023), arXiv:2311.18001 [astro-ph.HE]

    2023

  34. [42]

    Zhang and S

    C. Zhang and S. Xu, Astrophys. J. 975, 65 (2024), arXiv:2406.03542 [astro-ph.HE]

    2024

  35. [43]

    Barreto-Mota, E

    L. Barreto-Mota, E. M. de Gouveia Dal Pino, S. Xu, and A. Lazarian, (2024), arXiv:2405.12146 [astro-ph.HE]

    2024

  36. [44]

    Xiao, J.-F

    Y.-W. Xiao, J.-F. Zhang, and S. Xu, A&A (under re- view) (2025)

    2025

  37. [45]

    N¨ attil¨ a, Nature Communications 15, 7026 (2024), arXiv:2408.08161 [astro-ph.HE]

    J. N¨ attil¨ a, Nature Communications 15, 7026 (2024), arXiv:2408.08161 [astro-ph.HE]

    2024

  38. [46]

    Groselj, H

    D. Groselj, H. Hakobyan, A. M. Beloborodov, L. Sironi, and A. Philippov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 085202 (2024), arXiv:2301.11327 [astro-ph.HE]

    2024

  39. [47]

    D. F. G. Fiorillo, L. Comisso, E. Peretti, M. Petropoulou, and L. Sironi, Astrophys. J. 974, 75 (2024), arXiv:2407.01678 [astro-ph.HE]

    2024

  40. [48]

    Lemoine and F

    M. Lemoine and F. Rieger, Astron. Astrophys.697, A124 (2025), arXiv:2412.01457 [astro-ph.HE]

    2025

  41. [49]

    C. J. Cesarsky and R. M. Kulsrud, Astrophys. J. 185, 153 (1973)

    1973

  42. [50]

    Lazarian and E

    A. Lazarian and E. T. Vishniac, Astrophys. J. 517, 700 (1999), arXiv:astro-ph/9811037

    1999 arXiv

  43. [51]

    C. D. Dermer and G. Menon, High Energy Radiation from Black Holes: Gamma Rays, Cosmic Rays, and Neutrinos (2009)

    2009

  44. [52]

    N¨ attil¨ a, Astron

    J. N¨ attil¨ a, Astron. Astrophys. 664, A68 (2022), arXiv:1906.06306 [physics.comp-ph]

    2022

  45. [53]

    K. Wong, V. Zhdankin, D. A. Uzdensky, G. R. Werner, and M. C. Begelman, Astrophys. J. Lett. 893, L7 (2020), arXiv:1901.03439 [astro-ph.HE]

    2020

  46. [54]

    D. B. Melrose, Astrophys. Space Sci. 5, 131 (1969)

    1969

  47. [55]

    Xu and B

    S. Xu and B. Zhang, Astrophys. J. Lett. 846, L28 (2017), arXiv:1708.08029 [astro-ph.HE]. 13

    2017 arXiv

  48. [56]

    F. Guo, X. Li, W. Daughton, P. Kilian, H. Li, Y.-H. Liu, W. Yan, and D. Ma, Astrophys. J. Lett.879, L23 (2019), arXiv:1901.08308 [astro-ph.HE]

    2019 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Zenitani and M

    S. Zenitani and M. Hoshino, Astrophys. J. Lett. 562, L63 (2001), arXiv:1402.7139 [astro-ph.HE]

    2001 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Sironi and A

    L. Sironi and A. Spitkovsky, Astrophys. J. Lett.783, L21 (2014), arXiv:1401.5471 [astro-ph.HE]

    2014 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Lazarian, G

    A. Lazarian, G. Kowal, E. de Gouveia Dal Pino, and E. T. Vishniac, in Multi-scale Dynamical Processes in Space and Astrophysical Plasmas , Astrophysics and Space Science Proceedings, Vol. 33, edited by M. P. Leub- ner and Z. V¨ or¨ os (2012) p. 11, arXiv:1205.3795 [astro- ph.GA]

    2012 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Zhang, L

    H. Zhang, L. Sironi, and D. Giannios, Astrophys. J. 922, 261 (2021), arXiv:2105.00009 [astro-ph.HE]

    2021

  53. [61]

    Xu and A

    S. Xu and A. Lazarian, Astrophys. J. 942, 21 (2023), arXiv:2211.08444 [physics.plasm-ph]

    2023

  54. [62]

    F. Guo, H. Li, W. Daughton, X. Li, and Y.-H. Liu, Phys. Plasmas 23, 055708 (2016), arXiv:1604.02924 [astro- ph.HE]

    2016 arXiv

  55. [63]

    S. S. Kimura, K. Murase, and K. Toma, Astrophys. J. 806, 159 (2015), arXiv:1411.3588 [astro-ph.HE]

    2015 arXiv

  56. [64]

    Murase, S

    K. Murase, S. S. Kimura, and P. Meszaros, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 011101 (2020), arXiv:1904.04226 [astro- ph.HE]

    2020

  57. [65]

    Philippov, D

    A. Philippov, D. A. Uzdensky, A. Spitkovsky, and B. Cerutti, Astrophys. J. Lett. 876, L6 (2019), arXiv:1902.07730 [astro-ph.HE]

    2019 arXiv

  58. [66]

    Ripperda, M

    B. Ripperda, M. Liska, K. Chatterjee, G. Musoke, A. A. Philippov, S. B. Markoff, A. Tchekhovskoy, and Z. Younsi, Astrophys. J. Lett. 924, L32 (2022), arXiv:2109.15115 [astro-ph.HE]

    2022

  59. [67]

    Mbarek, A

    R. Mbarek, A. Philippov, A. Chernoglazov, A. Levinson, and R. Mushotzky, Phys. Rev. D 109, L101306 (2024), arXiv:2310.15222 [astro-ph.HE]

    2024

  60. [68]

    D. F. G. Fiorillo, M. Petropoulou, L. Comisso, E. Peretti, and L. Sironi, Astrophys. J. 961, L14 (2024), arXiv:2310.18254 [astro-ph.HE]

    2024

  61. [69]

    D. F. G. Fiorillo, L. Comisso, E. Peretti, M. Petropoulou, and L. Sironi, (2025), arXiv:2504.06336 [astro-ph.HE]

    2025

  62. [70]

    Efron, The Annals of Statistics 7, 1 (1979)

    B. Efron, The Annals of Statistics 7, 1 (1979)

    1979

  63. [71]

    G. B. Rybicki and A. P. Lightman, Radiative Processes in Astrophysics (1986)

    1986

  64. [72]

    Inoue and A

    Y. Inoue and A. Doi, Astrophys. J. 869, 114 (2018), arXiv:1810.10732 [astro-ph.HE]

    2018 arXiv

  65. [73]

    Inoue, D

    Y. Inoue, D. Khangulyan, and A. Doi, Astrophys. J. Lett. 891, L33 (2020), arXiv:1909.02239 [astro-ph.HE]

    2020

  66. [74]

    Inoue, D

    Y. Inoue, D. Khangulyan, and A. Doi, Galaxies 9, 36 (2021), arXiv:2105.08948 [astro-ph.HE]

    2021

  67. [75]

    Schlickeiser, Cosmic Ray Astrophysics (2002)

    R. Schlickeiser, Cosmic Ray Astrophysics (2002)

    2002

  68. [76]

    V. S. Ptuskin, Soviet Astronomy Letters 14, 255 (1988)

    1988

  69. [77]

    Cho and A

    J. Cho and A. Lazarian, Astrophys. J. 638, 811 (2006), arXiv:astro-ph/0509385

    2006 arXiv

  70. [78]

    Lemoine, J

    M. Lemoine, J. Plasma Phys. 89, 175890501 (2023), arXiv:2304.03023 [physics.plasm-ph]

    2023

  71. [79]

    Huang, G

    R. Huang, G. G. Howes, and A. J. McCubbin, Journal of Plasma Physics 90, 535900401 (2024), arXiv:2401.16697 [physics.plasm-ph]

    2024

  72. [80]

    Yang and B

    Y.-P. Yang and B. Zhang, Astrophys. J. Lett. 864, L16 (2018), arXiv:1808.05170 [astro-ph.HE]

    2018 arXiv

  73. [81]

    Comisso and L

    L. Comisso and L. Sironi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 255102 (2021), arXiv:2109.02666 [physics.plasm-ph]

    2021

  74. [82]

    Comisso, Astrophys

    L. Comisso, Astrophys. J. 972, 9 (2024), arXiv:2405.18227 [astro-ph.HE]

    2024

  75. [83]

    S. Das, B. Zhang, S. Razzaque, and S. Xu, (2025), arXiv:2504.10847 [astro-ph.HE]

    2025

  76. [84]

    Yang and B

    Y.-P. Yang and B. Zhang, Astrophys. J. 868, 31 (2018), arXiv:1712.02702 [astro-ph.HE]

    2018 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed May 19, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.