Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 27 references

Laterally Excited Bulk Acoustic Wave (LBAW) X-Cut Lithium Niobate Resonators

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper demonstrates that recessed interdigitated electrodes in X-cut lithium niobate excite S0 and SH0 lateral bulk waves and, for the first time in this resonator class, make their higher-order overtones usable.

desk verdict First LOBAW overtone demonstration is real and worth refereeing, but the thickness-decoupling claim needs experimental support before it carries weight. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.04433 v1 pith:PVUUCW46 submitted 2025-06-04 eess.SY cs.SY

Walter Gubinelli , Ryan Tetro , Pietro Simeoni , Luca Colombo , Matteo Rinaldi This is my paper
classification eess.SYcs.SY
keywords lateralbulkacousticwaveresonatorsLBAWlithiumniobateX-cutrecessedelectrodesS0modeSH0overtone
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper aims to show that a laterally excited bulk acoustic wave resonator works better when its interdigitated electrodes are recessed into the piezoelectric film rather than laid on top of it. With 100 nm X-cut lithium niobate and electrodes sunk to 80 percent of the thickness, the device excites both the $S_0$ and $\mathrm{SH}_0$ lateral bulk modes, and for the first time in this resonator class it makes their higher-order overtones usable. The best measured results are a figure of merit of 437 at 673 MHz for the $\mathrm{SH}_0$ fundamental and 53 at 1.05 GHz for the $\mathrm{SH}_0$ overtone. The larger claim is that the recessed layout puts the resonance frequency under lithographic control, so several frequencies could be fabricated on a single chip without changing the film stack.

What carries the argument

The central object is the recessed interdigitated electrode pair: metal fingers sunk 80 nm into a 100 nm X-cut lithium niobate film, leaving a thin unmetallized plate under the fingers. The design variable is the ratio $w_m/w_p$ of metal finger width to piezoelectric width; sweeping this ratio sets the dispersion of the $S_0$ and $\mathrm{SH}_0$ lateral bulk modes and their first odd overtones. Finite-element dispersion curves put the peak electromechanical coupling at narrow fingers for the fundamentals (about $w_m/w_p = 0.1$) and at wide fingers for the overtones (about $w_m/w_p = 1.1$). The measured admittance is then reduced to an equivalent-circuit model so that quality factors and figures of merit can be extracted.

What would settle it

Fabricate two resonators with identical electrode geometry and recess depth but different film thicknesses, then compare their $S_0$ or $\mathrm{SH}_0$ resonance and antiresonance frequencies: a shift beyond the simulation error would falsify the thickness-independence claim. A supporting check is to measure the actual recess depth by cross-section or profilometry, since uncontrolled depth variation would make the geometry-only conclusion untestable.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the discovery is that a recessed-electrode geometry efficiently launches lateral bulk acoustic waves in a thin X-cut lithium niobate plate, in both $S_0$ and $\mathrm{SH}_0$ polarizations, and that the first odd overtones of those modes are strong enough to use. The measured $\mathrm{SH}_0$ fundamental reaches a figure of merit of 437 at 673 MHz, and the $\mathrm{SH}_0$ overtone reaches 53 at 1.05 GHz, which the authors read as the first viable overtone demonstration for this type of resonator. They also claim that because the electrodes sit inside the film, the dispersion relation is set by the lateral geometry, namely the ratio $w_m/w_p$ of metal width to piezoelectric width, rather than by film thickness, so that the operating frequency can be tuned lithographically.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the resonance frequency is set by the lateral electrode geometry $w_m/w_p$ alone, so the dispersion relation is decoupled from the 100 nm film thickness; the paper's support is finite-element simulation at one thickness with electrodes recessed to 80 percent, with no experiment varying the film thickness and no reported etch-depth metrology.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The resonator works in overtone mode, not only at its fundamental tone, giving designers an extra frequency band from the same plate.
  • Shifting the mask changes the frequency: adjusting $w_m/w_p$ selects the operating band without changing the piezoelectric film, which enables on-chip multi-frequency scaling.
  • Recessed electrodes increase static capacitance density and reduce series resistance, lowering ohmic losses in a filter.
  • Because both $S_0$ and $\mathrm{SH}_0$ modes are excited on the same substrate, one chip offers two polarizations with different coupling and frequency behaviour.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Extending beyond the paper: a direct thickness sweep at fixed $w_m/w_p$ would test whether the decoupling claim survives fabrication reality; if it does, the design can move to thicker films for higher power handling.
  • The same recessed-electrode trick could transfer to other high-coupling piezoelectric films, where removing the thickness from the dispersion problem would simplify multi-band filter design.
  • Overtones could push the operating frequency upward without shrinking lithographic pitch, which is the lever that matters for 5G/6G front ends.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper reports the design, fabrication, and characterization of laterally excited bulk acoustic wave (LBAW) resonators on X-cut LiNbO3 with interdigitated electrodes recessed into the piezoelectric film. The authors demonstrate fundamental S0 and SH0 modes and, for the first time for this resonator type, higher-order overtones (LOBAW). The headline results are mBVD-fitted figures of merit of 437 at 673 MHz for the SH0 fundamental and 53 at 1.05 GHz for the SH0 overtone. The central architectural claim is that recessed electrodes decouple the dispersion relation from film thickness, so that frequency can be tuned lithographically via the metal-to-piezoelectric width ratio wm/wp, enabling on-chip multi-frequency scaling. Design optimization is performed with COMSOL Multiphysics, and the fabricated devices are measured in vacuum with a 2-port VNA and fitted to a single-tone mBVD model.

Significance. If the thickness-decoupling claim holds, the proposed LBAW architecture would offer a meaningful advantage over conventional Lamb-wave resonators, whose dispersion depends sensitively on film thickness, and would support the vision of single-chip multi-frequency RF front-ends. The demonstration of overtones with FoMs of 437 and 53 is a substantive experimental advance, and the measurement methodology (2-port VNA in vacuum, standard mBVD fitting) is sound. However, the strongest claims rest on a single 100-nm fabrication run and on simulation results that are only partially connected to the measured devices. The paper would be substantially stronger with direct evidence for thickness insensitivity and with transparent reporting of fit quality and device statistics.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section III, 'Design and Optimization'] The claim that 'the performed optimization is not sensitive to the thickness of the piezoelectric layer' is load-bearing for the whole architecture, but its support is only COMSOL dispersion curves at a single thickness (t=100 nm) with electrodes recessed to 80% of the film. No simulation sweep over thickness, no experimental thickness series, and no etch-depth metrology are reported. Because the fabricated unit cell contains a 20 nm unmetallized LiNbO3 plate beneath the electrodes, the dispersion relation could still depend on t and on the recess depth in ways that are not quantified. This is an evidence-sufficiency concern: the device still works, but the core advantage over LVRs—lithographic frequency tuning independent of film thickness—is not established. Please provide FEA results at several film thicknesses and recess depths, or an explicit quantitative bound on the resulting frequency shift and coupling variation.
  2. [Section IV and Figs. 6-7] The headline FoM values of 437 and 53 are extracted from mBVD fits that appear only as overlaid curves in Figures 6 and 7. The manuscript reports no fit residuals, no number of characterized devices, and no device-to-device statistics. Because these values anchor the abstract and conclusions, the reader cannot judge whether the fits are representative or whether the FoM values are robust. Please provide fit residuals, the number of devices measured for each geometry, and the spread in the fitted parameters (or state explicitly that a single best device is reported).
  3. [Section III, last paragraph] The statement that 'no net trade off between coupling and quality factor is to be expected' is based on the simulated energy confinement ratio η in Fig. 4, not on measured quality factors. The energy confinement ratio is a proxy for one acoustic loss mechanism, and it does not directly establish the Q-FoM trade-off. Please report measured or fitted Q (and FoM) as a function of wm/wp for the fabricated devices, or explicitly restrict the claim to a simulation-based prediction about η.
  4. [Section IV, 'FABRICATION AND CHARACTERIZATION'] The measured optimum for the fundamental tones is wm/wp=0.075, which lies outside the simulated optima (wm/wp=0.1 for S0 and 0.1125 for SH0). This discrepancy is not discussed. Since the purpose of the COMSOL optimization is to guide design, the predictive accuracy of the model at the fabricated geometry needs to be reconciled, for example by investigating sensitivity to recess depth, thickness, or fabrication tolerances.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract] The sentence 'The excited SH0 modes exhibits Figures of Merit' has a subject-verb agreement error: 'modes exhibit'.
  2. [Section IV] The paragraph beginning 'electrodes are initially etched via timed Deep Oxide Etching' appears to start in the middle of a thought; a leading subject (e.g., 'The electrodes') is missing, and the transition from Section III is abrupt.
  3. [Fig. 1 caption] The notation 'σxx stress distributions' should use a subscript format (σ_xx) for clarity, and the caption could specify that the stress is along the plate midline at resonance.
  4. [Section V] The phrase 'first ever demonstration of viable overtones for this type of resonator' is strong. Consider positioning it more carefully relative to prior overtone work in related laterally excited platforms (e.g., OBARs and Refs. [21] and [22]) and to the B-IDT work in Ref. [22], which may already report overtone-like modes.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the measured resonances and mBVD-fitted figures of merit are self-contained, and the thickness-decoupling claim is a modeling/evidence-sufficiency concern rather than a reduction to input.

full rationale

The paper's central results are measured VNA admittance responses fitted with a single-tone mBVD model, not derived from the same data used to define the claims. The simulated dispersion curves in Section III are used to guide design and identify candidate wm/wp ratios, but the reported FoM values (437 at 673 MHz, 53 at 1.05 GHz) come from fabricated devices that differ from the simulated optimum (wm/wp = 0.075 measured versus 0.1/0.1125 simulated), so the measurements are not forced by the simulations. The claim that the recessed-electrode architecture decouples dispersion from film thickness is justified by the authors' own COMSOL sweeps at a single 100 nm thickness; this is an evidence-sufficiency limitation, not a circular definition or a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction. Self-citations to the group's earlier work ([24], [25], [26]) provide process recipes and loss-analysis analogies, but none of these is invoked as the sole justification of the central measured result, and no uniqueness theorem or definitional equivalence reduces the target claim to an input. Limitations explicitly noted in the paper (low Qp attributed to improper release, parasitic capacitance from AlSiCu oxidation, and room for improvement in spurious modes) are acknowledged weaknesses rather than circular reasoning. Therefore no specific circular step can be quoted, and the appropriate finding is no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The reader pays for the COMSOL-derived design curves, the mBVD-extracted FoM values, and the inherited fabrication process (self-aligned release, ref 26) without underlying files or raw data. No new physical entities are introduced. The free parameters are design choices (recess depth, wm/wp ratios) and fit parameters (mBVD), not physical constants.

free parameters (3)
  • Electrode recess depth (80% of the 100 nm film) = 80 nm
    Hand-chosen compromise between the FEA ideal of full-thickness electrodes and fabrication feasibility (Section III). The thickness-decoupling claim assumes this depth is sufficient, but no etch-depth metrology or sensitivity study is reported.
  • wm/wp electrode-to-piezoelectric width ratios = 0.075 (best measured fundamental), 1.1 (overtone)
    The central design knob of the paper. The reported best fundamental ratio 0.075 is not the simulated coupling optimum (0.1 to 0.1125), and thickness-independence of these ratios is asserted from simulation only (Sections III-IV).
  • Single-tone mBVD circuit parameters (Lm, Cm, Rm, C0, R0) = Parameter values in Figs. 6-7; not tabulated in text
    Every headline FoM number is computed from these fits to measured Y12. Fit residuals, FoM definition, and the treatment of spurious flexural modes are not documented, so the reported FoM inherits the model's assumptions (Sections IV-V).
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Standard linear piezoelectricity with published X-cut LiNbO3 constants in COMSOL adequately predicts dispersion, coupling, and energy confinement for these devices.
    All design curves (Figs. 2-4) and the claimed S0/SH0 mode identification rest on this; material constants and mesh settings are not shipped.
  • domain assumption Two-dimensional FEA results at the single 100 nm thickness transfer to fabricated devices, so dispersion is insensitive to film thickness.
    This is the load-bearing premise for the 'lithographic tuning' and 'multi-frequency on one chip' claims; the paper reports no experiment varying thickness and no thickness uniformity data.
  • ad hoc to paper Recessed electrodes penetrating 80% of the film behave like the idealized full-depth electrodes of the FEA.
    The paper states full-depth would be ideal but 80% is adopted to simplify fabrication (Section III); no simulation or measurement quantifies the effect of the residual 20% unmetallized layer.
  • domain assumption The single-resonance mBVD model adequately represents each measured device despite observed flexural spurious modes and parasitic series capacitance.
    Headline FoM is extracted under this model, while the paper itself notes spurious flexural modes (Section V) and parasitic capacitance from AlSiCu oxidation (Section IV), which the fit must absorb.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Laterally Excited Bulk Acoustic Wave (LBAW) X-Cut Lithium Niobate Resonators." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/PVUUCW46

@misc{pith2026250604433,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Laterally Excited Bulk Acoustic Wave (LBAW) X-Cut Lithium Niobate Resonators},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/PVUUCW46}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.04433}
}
read the original abstract

In this work, Laterally excited Bulk Acoustic Wave (LBAW) resonators on X-cut Lithium Niobate (LiNbO3) and, for the first time their higher-order overtones (LOBAW) are demonstrated by embedding interdigitated electrodes recessed into the piezoelectric thin film, allowing to exploit both S0 and SH0 vibrational modes. This recessed electrode architecture decouples the dispersion relation from film thickness, enabling lithographic tuning of resonance frequency and on-chip multi-frequency scaling on a single substrate, while concurrently increasing static capacitance density (C0) and reducing ohmic losses (Rs). The excited SH0 modes exhibits Figures of Merit (FoM) of 437 at 673 MHz for the fundamental tone and 53 at 1.05 GHz for the overtone. The proposed architecture holds large potential for future 5G/6G advanced radio frequency front-end modules, enabling on-chip multi-frequency scaling and improved performance.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.04433 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Schematic comparison of laterally excited resonator configurations (LVR, LBAW and LOBAW) with a finger pitch wp = 2µm, showing top-view electrode layouts and electric field distribution, COMSOL® Multiphysics simulated S0 and SH0 mode shapes, and σxx stress distributions along the plate midline. T [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. COMSOL® Multiphysics simulated dispersion curves for resonance and antiresonance frequencies as function of wm/wp ratio for fundamental S0 and SH0 modes (left) and their overtones (right) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. COMSOL® Multiphysics simulated dispersion curves for electrome￾chanical coupling as function of wm/wp ratio for fundamental S0 and SH0 modes (left) and their overtones (right) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: COMSOL® Multiphysics simulated dispersion curves for energy confinement ratio η as function of wm/wp ratio for fundamental S0 and SH0 modes (left) and their overtones (right). losses further degrade their quality factor and power handling capability [11]. Improved vari…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: a) Fabrication flow schematic summary as detailed in Section IV. b) Fabricated chip image highlighting different device orientations. c) Optical microscope image of unreleased resonator after performing release pits etching with self-alignment method. simulated, identi…

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

27 extracted references · 26 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    The history, present and future with iot,

    N. Sharma, M. Shamkuwar, and I. Singh, “The history, present and future with iot,” in Internet of things and big data analytics for smart generation, pp. 27–51, Springer, 2018

    work page 2018

  2. [2]

    5G technology and networks (speed, use cases, rollout),

    THALES, “5G technology and networks (speed, use cases, rollout),” 2023

    work page 2023

  3. [3]

    Compact and wideband nanoacoustic pass-band filters for future 5G and 6G cellular radios,

    G. Giribaldi, L. Colombo, P. Simeoni, and M. Rinaldi, “Compact and wideband nanoacoustic pass-band filters for future 5G and 6G cellular radios,” Nature Communications, vol. 15, no. 1, p. 304, 2024

    work page 2024

  4. [4]

    Device technologies for RF front -end circuits in next -generation wireless communications,

    M. Feng, S.-C. Shen, D. C. Caruth, and J.-J. Huang, “Device technologies for RF front -end circuits in next -generation wireless communications,” Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 92, no. 2, pp. 354–375, 2004

    work page 2004

  5. [5]

    System -Level Analysis of Far -Field Radio Frequency Power Delivery for mm -Sized Sensor Nodes,

    J. Charthad, N. Dolatsha, A. Rekhi, and A. Arbabian, “System -Level Analysis of Far -Field Radio Frequency Power Delivery for mm -Sized Sensor Nodes,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers, vol. 63, pp. 300–311, 2 2016

    work page 2016

  6. [6]

    From 5g to 6g —challenges, technologies, and applications,

    A. I. Salameh and M. El Tarhuni, “From 5g to 6g —challenges, technologies, and applications,” Future Internet, vol. 14, no. 4, p. 117, 2022

    work page 2022

  7. [7]

    XBAW, An Enabling Technology for Next Generation Resonators and Filter Solutions for 5G and Wi-Fi 6/6E/7 applications,

    R. Vetury, A. S. Kochhar, and J. B. Shealy, “XBAW, An Enabling Technology for Next Generation Resonators and Filter Solutions for 5G and Wi-Fi 6/6E/7 applications,” in 2022 International Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM), pp. 16.1.1–16.1.4, 2022

    work page 2022

  8. [8]

    From microwave acoustic filters to millimeter -wave operation and new applications,

    A. Hagelauer, R. Ruby, S. Inoue, V. Plessky, K. -Y. Hashimoto, R. Nak- agawa, J. Verdu, P. d. Paco, A. Mortazawi, G. Piazza, Z. Schaffer, E. T.-T. Yen, T. Forster, and A. Tag, “From microwave acoustic filters to millimeter -wave operation and new applications,” IEEE Journal of Microwaves, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 484–508, 2023

    work page 2023

Show all 27 references
  1. [9]

    CMOS-Compatible AlN Piezoelectric Micromachined Ultrasonic Trans- ducers,

    S. Shelton, M. Chan, H. Park, D. A. Horsley, B. Boser, I. Izyumin, R. Przybyla, T. Frey, M. Judy, K. Nunan, F. Sammoura, and K. Yang, “CMOS-Compatible AlN Piezoelectric Micromachined Ultrasonic Trans- ducers,” 2009

    2009

  2. [10]

    Morgan, Surface acoustic wave filters: With applications to electronic communications and signal processing

    D. Morgan, Surface acoustic wave filters: With applications to electronic communications and signal processing. Academic Press, 2010

    2010

  3. [11]

    Surface-acoustic-wave resonators,

    D. Bell and R. Li, “Surface-acoustic-wave resonators,” Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 64, no. 5, pp. 711–721, 1976

    1976

  4. [12]

    High - performance saw resonator on new multilayered substrate using litao 3 crystal,

    T. Takai, H. Iwamoto, Y. Takamine, H. Yamazaki, T. Fuyutsume, H. Kyoya, T. Nakao, H. Kando, M. Hiramoto, T. Toi, et al. , “High - performance saw resonator on new multilayered substrate using litao 3 crystal,” IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency con...

    2017

  5. [13]

    Incredible high performance saw resonator on novel multi-layerd substrate,

    T. Takai, H. Iwamoto, Y. Takamine, H. Yamazaki, T. Fuyutsume, H. Kyoya, T. Nakao, H. Kando, M. Hiramoto, T. Toi, et al., “Incredible high performance saw resonator on novel multi-layerd substrate,” in 2016 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS), pp. 1–4, IEEE, 2016

    2016

  6. [14]

    A decade of fbar success and what is needed for another successful decade,

    R. Ruby, “A decade of fbar success and what is needed for another successful decade,” in 2011 Symposium on Piezoelectricity, Acoustic Waves and Device Applications (SPAWDA), pp. 365–369, 2011

    2011

  7. [15]

    A Manufacturable AlScN Periodically Polarized Piezoelectric Film Bulk Acoustic Wave Resonator (AlScN P3F BAW) Operating in Overtone Mode at X and Ku Band,

    R. Vetury, A. Kochhar, J. Leathersich, C. Moe, M. Winters, J. Shealy, and R. H. Olsson, “A Manufacturable AlScN Periodically Polarized Piezoelectric Film Bulk Acoustic Wave Resonator (AlScN P3F BAW) Operating in Overtone Mode at X and Ku Band,” in 2023 IEEE/MTT-S International...

    2023

  8. [16]

    Thin film bulk wave acoustic resonators (FBAR) for wireless applications,

    R. Ruby, P. Bradley, Y. Oshmyansky, A. Chien, and J. Larson, “Thin film bulk wave acoustic resonators (FBAR) for wireless applications,” in 2001 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium. Proceedings. An International Symposium (Cat. No.01CH37263), vol. 1, pp. 813–821 vol.1, 2001

    2001

  9. [17]

    Z. A. Schaffer, Overmoded Bulk Acoustic Resonators for mmWave Filtering. PhD thesis, Carnegie Mellon University, 2023

    2023

  10. [18]

    2 –16 ghz multifrequency x -cut lithium niobate nems resonators on a single chip,

    R. Tetro, L. Colombo, and M. Rinaldi, “2 –16 ghz multifrequency x -cut lithium niobate nems resonators on a single chip,” in 2024 IEEE 19th International Conference on Nano/Micro Engineered and Molecular Systems (NEMS), pp. 1–4, 2024

    2024

  11. [19]

    Figure- of-merit enhancement for laterally vibrating lithium niobate mems resonators,

    S. Gong and G. Piazza, “Figure- of-merit enhancement for laterally vibrating lithium niobate mems resonators,” IEEE transactions on electron devices, vol. 60, no. 11, pp. 3888–3894, 2013

    2013

  12. [20]

    Dissipation analysis methods and q -enhancement strategies in piezoelectric mems laterally vibrating resonators: A review,

    C. Tu, J. E.- Y. Lee, and X.- S. Zhang, “Dissipation analysis methods and q -enhancement strategies in piezoelectric mems laterally vibrating resonators: A review,” Sensors, vol. 20, no. 17, p. 4978, 2020

    2020

  13. [21]

    5 ghz laterally-excited bulk -wave resonators (xbars) based on thin platelets of lithium niobate,

    V. Plessky, S. Yandrapalli, P. Turner, L. Villanueva, J. Koskela, and R. Hammond, “5 ghz laterally-excited bulk -wave resonators (xbars) based on thin platelets of lithium niobate,” Electronics Letters , vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 98–100, 2019

    2019

  14. [22]

    Suspended lithium niobate acoustic resonators with buried electrodes for radiofrequency filtering,

    S. Stettler and L. G. Villanueva, “Suspended lithium niobate acoustic resonators with buried electrodes for radiofrequency filtering,” 2024

    2024

  15. [23]

    33 GHz Overmoded Bulk Acoustic Resonator,

    Z. Schaffer, P. Simeoni, and G. Piazza, “33 GHz Overmoded Bulk Acoustic Resonator,” IEEE Microwave and Wireless Components Letters, vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 656–659, 2022

    2022

  16. [24]

    Scandium aluminum nitride overmoded bulk acoustic resonators for future wireless communication,

    W. Gubinelli, P. Simeoni, R. Tetro, L. Colombo, and M. Rinaldi, “Scandium aluminum nitride overmoded bulk acoustic resonators for future wireless communication,” 2024

    2024

  17. [25]

    Characterization of acoustic losses in interdigitated vhf to mmwave piezoelectric m/nems resonators,

    L. Colombo, G. Giribaldi, R. Tetro, J. Guida, W. Gubinelli, L. Spagnuolo, N. Maietta, S. Ghosh, and M. Rinaldi, “Characterization of acoustic losses in interdigitated vhf to mmwave piezoelectric m/nems resonators,” in 2024 IEEE Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Contro...

    2024

  18. [26]

    Sub -ghz x -cut lithium niobate s mode mems resonators,

    L. Colombo, A. Kochhar, G. Vidal-A´ lvarez, P. Simeoni, U. Soysal, and G. Piazza, “Sub -ghz x -cut lithium niobate s mode mems resonators,” Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 888–900, 2022

    2022

  19. [27]

    Modified Butterworth- Van Dyke circuit for FBAR resonators and automated measurement system,

    J. Larson, P. Bradley, S. Wartenberg, and R. Ruby, “Modified Butterworth- Van Dyke circuit for FBAR resonators and automated measurement system,” in 2000 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium. Proceedings. An Inter - national Symposium (Cat. No.00CH37121) , vol. 1, pp. 863– 868 vol.1, Oc...

    2000

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.