Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 major objections 4 minor 100 references

Classifying Dental Care Providers Through Machine Learning with Features Ranking

T0 review · 5 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that a neural network can classify dental providers as safety-net or standard with 94.1% accuracy on 2018 claims data, and that treatment-volume counts — not demographics — carry the signal.

desk verdict The 94.1% NN accuracy is not credible as presented, mostly because of provider-ID leakage and the paper's own contradictions; the underlying question is real, but this draft is not ready for review. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.04474 v1 pith:R4Q5GGYB submitted 2025-06-04 cs.LG cs.AI

Mohammad Subhi Al-Batah , Mowafaq Salem Alzboon , Muhyeeddin Alqaraleh , Mohammed Hasan Abu-Arqoub , Rashiq Rafiq Marie This is my paper
classification cs.LGcs.AI
keywords machinelearningdentalproviderclassificationfeaturerankingensemblemodelshealthcareanalyticssafetynetclinicsclassimbalanceSMOTE
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tries to establish that machine-learning models can reliably tell safety-net dental clinics (SNCs) from standard providers using administrative claims data, and that the features doing the work are treatment-volume counts rather than patient demographics. On a 2018 dataset of 24,300 providers, a three-hidden-layer neural network reaches 94.1% accuracy under 10-fold cross-validation, with gradient boosting (93.2%) and random forest (93.0%) close behind — all far above the 81.1% majority-class baseline. The authors also claim that seven feature-ranking methods consistently put the treatment-related counts TXMT_USER_CNT and TXMT_SVC_CNT at the top of the list, while AGE_GROUP and CALENDAR_YEAR barely matter. If correct, this gives health administrators a cheap, accurate flag for identifying clinics that serve underserved populations, and a template for handling imbalanced, missing-data-heavy healthcare datasets.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the pairing of feature ranking with incremental feature-subset evaluation. Seven scorers — information gain, gain ratio, Gini index, ANOVA, chi-square, ReliefF, and FCBF — each order the 20 features by association with the provider-type target, and the consensus order puts TXMT_USER_CNT first and the advanced-service annotation features last. Each of the twelve models is then retrained and 10-fold cross-validated on the top-1, top-2, and so on up to the top-20 features, so the accuracy-versus-subset curve directly tests whether the rankings carry real signal and whether models gain from more features. Median and mode imputation for the 38.1% missing values, together with SMOTE for the 80.7/19.3 class imbalance, are the preprocessing steps that make the evaluation possible.

What would settle it

Re-run the exact pipeline with SMOTE strictly inside each training fold and evaluate only on untouched original instances: if the neural network's accuracy falls materially below 94.1%, synthetic-instance leakage explains the headline. A companion ablation — drop the four TXMT treatment-count features and see whether accuracy collapses toward the 81.1% majority baseline — tests whether the treatment-volume signal the paper identifies is really the carrier.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the discovery is that provider type in the 2018 dental-claims data is strongly predictable from service-volume features: a neural network with three hidden layers (64-32-16 nodes, ReLU activation, Adam optimizer) classifies the 24,300 providers into standard rendering versus safety-net clinic with 94.1% accuracy using all 20 features, and its accuracy climbs from 81.1% with only the top-ranked feature to 94.1% with all features. The same climb appears in gradient boosting (to 93.2%), random forest (to 93.0%), AdaBoost (to 92.8%), and the CN2 rule inducer (to 91.3%). Seven ranking scorers — information gain, gain ratio, Gini index, ANOVA, chi-square, ReliefF, and FCBF — place the treatment-user and treatment-service counts (TXMT_USER_CNT, TXMT_SVC_CNT) and their annotation codes at the top, while demographic variables are nearly irrelevant. The paper reads this as evidence that operational treatment volume, rather than beneficiary mix, is what defines a safety-net provider.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the 2018 dataset is a faithful, correctly labeled sample of dental providers and that SMOTE oversampling and median/mode imputation were applied inside the cross-validation training folds, so no synthetic or imputed rows ever reached the test folds — the paper never states that either condition actually holds.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the 94.1% neural-network accuracy holds on unseen data, provider type can be flagged from routine claims without site visits or surveys, giving policymakers a low-cost tool for locating safety-net capacity.
  • Because treatment counts dominate the feature rankings, the practical screening rule is volume-based: high treatment-user and treatment-service counts mark SNC providers, and demographic fields add almost nothing.
  • Accuracy for the best models climbs as ranked features are added, so for this task aggressive feature pruning would cost accuracy; the value of the rankings is interpretability and efficiency, not a lift from dropping features.
  • The constant-classifier baseline at 81.1% — exactly the majority-class share — frames every model's gain: ensembles and the neural network add 11-13 percentage points of real signal over always predicting 'standard provider'.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper leaves unstated whether SMOTE oversampling runs inside each cross-validation fold or before the split; if synthetic SNC rows reached the test folds, the 94.1% figure would be inflated, and a re-run with SMOTE confined to training folds would settle that.
  • Decision Tree and Logistic Regression sit exactly at the 81.1% majority baseline for every feature subset, which looks less like stability and more like both models degenerating into constant majority-class predictors.
  • Because all 24,300 rows come from a single 2018 claims year, the cleanest extension is temporal: train on 2018 and test on 2019 or 2020 claims to see whether the treatment-count signal and the 94% accuracy transfer across years.
  • The top-ranked features are raw annual counts per provider, so a provider who simply sees more patients will score higher; re-expressing counts as rates (treatment users per beneficiary) would test whether it is treatment intensity or sheer patient volume that marks a safety-net clinic.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

5 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports a machine-learning study classifying dental providers into standard and safety-net-clinic (SNC) categories using a 2018 Kaggle dataset of 24,300 instances with 20 features. The authors apply seven feature-ranking methods, train twelve classifiers under 10-fold cross-validation, and evaluate accuracy on incremental feature subsets. They report that a neural network achieves the highest accuracy (94.1%) with all 20 features, followed by gradient boosting (93.2%) and random forest (93.0%). The paper concludes that treatment-related service counts are the strongest predictors and that the approach can support resource allocation for underserved populations.

Significance. If the results were valid, the study would provide a broad comparison of feature-selection and classification methods for an imbalanced healthcare dataset, and the finding that operational service counts outweigh demographic variables would be practically relevant. The paper's strengths are its breadth—twelve models, seven ranking methods, and incremental feature sets—and its explicit attention to missing values and class imbalance. However, the central accuracy claim is undermined by target-leakage risks, an internal contradiction in the feature ranking, and the absence of reproducibility artifacts. The contribution is therefore not established at the level required for publication.

major comments (5)
  1. [Methods (feature list) / Results (Figure 1)] The feature list includes 'Rendering Npi' (Methods, feature list; Table 1), and the data are described as beneficiary and service counts 'by rendering providers (by NPI)' (Methods, dataset description). Since the label is a provider-level attribute, any NPI appearing in both training and test folds of row-level 10-fold cross-validation allows the model to memorize the answer. The paper does not state whether cross-validation is grouped by NPI, and the ranked list places RENDERING_NPI at position 5 while the accompanying analysis says it has 'very low scores across all methods' and 'is not useful'—a direct contradiction. This target-leakage risk directly affects the central 94.1% accuracy claim.
  2. [Methods (SMOTE)] The Methods state that class imbalance was mitigated via SMOTE but do not specify whether SMOTE was applied before or inside the 10-fold cross-validation loop. If applied before splitting, synthetic SNC instances contaminate test folds and inflate reported accuracy. Although the Constant classifier baseline of 0.811 equals the majority proportion, consistent with evaluation on original instances, the manuscript never confirms the ordering. This omission is load-bearing for every accuracy value in Table 2.
  3. [Table 2] The Decision Tree and Logistic Regression rows report exactly 0.811 for every feature subset, identical to the Constant classifier baseline. The Analysis of Results text acknowledges the stability but offers no explanation. A model whose accuracy is completely invariant to the features either always predicts the majority class or suffers from an evaluation error; either way, the table's credibility as a model comparison is undermined.
  4. [Methods / Results] The Methods claim that performance was assessed using accuracy, AUC, F1-score, precision, and recall, but the Results present only accuracy. For a dataset with a 19.3% minority class and a stated objective of identifying SNC providers, accuracy alone is insufficient, and no confidence intervals or fold-level variance are reported. The 94.1% figure therefore cannot be interpreted as reliable ensemble performance without per-class metrics.
  5. [Methods (hyperparameters)] No code, data, or complete hyperparameter settings are provided. Only the Random Forest (200 estimators, max depth 15) and Neural Network (three hidden layers 64-32-16, ReLU, Adam) are specified; the remaining ten models and the feature-ranking implementation are not described in sufficient detail to reproduce the experiments. The paper's main evidence is a set of empirical accuracy numbers, so this lack of reproducibility support is a load-bearing limitation.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Throughout] The abstract and body use inconsistent decimal separators (e.g., '94,1 %' vs '94.1%') and thousands separators ('24 300' vs '24,300'); please standardize.
  2. [Results, Figure 1] Figure 1 is referenced and described in the text, but the actual plot is not included in the manuscript, preventing verification of the ranking.
  3. [Related Work] The related-work section includes many paragraphs only tangentially related to provider classification (e.g., Refs. 25-42), making the literature review diffuse; consider focusing on studies directly involving provider-level prediction or class-imbalanced medical data.
  4. [Conclusions] The conclusion contains the phrase 'aggravating performance' where 'improving performance' or 'aggregating performance' was likely intended; please proofread for similar language errors.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No circular derivation of the 94.1% accuracy; only minor self-referential framing in the research-gap narrative.

  1. self citation load bearing [Introduction, 'Research Gap for this research paper' paragraph (statements supported by refs 12-13)]
    "Research Gap for this research paper: limited Exploration of Provider Classification: while machine learning has been applied in various aspects of dental research such as caries detection and material durability, the classification of dental providers into standard rendering providers and safety net clinic (SNC) providers remains underexplored.(12) This is critical given the importance of SNCs in providing care to underserved populations, yet there’s a scarcity of studies focusing on this specific classification task.(13)"

    The premise that provider classification is 'underexplored' and that a 'scarcity of studies' exists is the paper's motivating gap, but the citations supplied for this premise (refs 12 and 13, and similarly refs 14-15 and 43) are the authors' own prior works, not independent external evidence. This makes the novelty framing self-referential: the paper validates the need for itself by citing itself. However, this does not enter the empirical classification pipeline, so it is a minor, narrative-level circularity rather than a derivation-level one.

full rationale

The paper's central claim—the 94.1% Neural Network accuracy and the feature-ranking conclusions—is produced by an empirical pipeline (imputation, SMOTE, ranking, 10-fold cross-validation) and does not reduce by construction to any fitted equation or to a cited theorem. No equation in the paper makes the predicted quantity an input, and no external 'uniqueness' argument is invoked to force the model choices. The only circularity-like feature is in the narrative: the claimed research gap and several methodological justifications are supported by the authors' own prior papers (e.g., refs 12-15, 43), including a SMOTE citation to an unrelated grid-computing paper by the same group. These self-citations are not load-bearing for the accuracy numbers, which stand or fall on data handling and cross-validation design. Concerns such as possible NPI leakage or SMOTE-before-split are validity/correctness issues, not circularity. The score is therefore low, reflecting only the self-referential framing.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on several unverified assumptions: the authenticity of the Kaggle dataset, the correctness of the preprocessing pipeline, the validity of accuracy as the metric, and the proper configuration of the ML tools. The free parameters are standard hyperparameters and preprocessing choices, but most are not fully specified, making the 94.1% result difficult to interpret or reproduce.

free parameters (4)
  • Random Forest hyperparameters = 200 estimators, max depth 15
    Chosen by grid search; directly affects the reported 93.0% accuracy.
  • Neural Network architecture = 3 hidden layers (64-32-16), ReLU, Adam
    Chosen by grid search; directly affects the reported 94.1% accuracy.
  • Imputation strategy = median for numeric, mode for categorical
    Selected by the authors to handle 38.1% missing values; shapes all downstream results.
  • SMOTE sampling parameters = not specified
    Oversampling ratio and number of neighbors are not reported; impacts class balance and model training.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The Kaggle dataset accurately represents 2018 dental providers and their SNC status.
    No dataset identifier or provenance is given; target labels are taken as ground truth without external validation.
  • domain assumption Median/mode imputation and SMOTE are applied inside the cross-validation loop.
    The paper states SMOTE was used but does not specify whether it is applied before or within CV folds; this ordering determines whether test accuracy is realistic or inflated.
  • domain assumption Accuracy is an appropriate evaluation metric for this imbalanced classification problem.
    With a 19.3% minority class, accuracy can be high even with poor SNC recall; the paper does not report per-class precision, recall, or F1.
  • domain assumption The unspecified ML tool implementations are correctly configured.
    The constant outputs for Decision Tree and Logistic Regression suggest possible configuration problems; no tool versions or configuration details are given.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Classifying Dental Care Providers Through Machine Learning with Features Ranking." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/R4Q5GGYB

@misc{pith2026250604474,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Classifying Dental Care Providers Through Machine Learning with Features Ranking},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/R4Q5GGYB}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.04474}
}
read the original abstract

This study investigates the application of machine learning (ML) models for classifying dental providers into two categories - standard rendering providers and safety net clinic (SNC) providers - using a 2018 dataset of 24,300 instances with 20 features. The dataset, characterized by high missing values (38.1%), includes service counts (preventive, treatment, exams), delivery systems (FFS, managed care), and beneficiary demographics. Feature ranking methods such as information gain, Gini index, and ANOVA were employed to identify critical predictors, revealing treatment-related metrics (TXMT_USER_CNT, TXMT_SVC_CNT) as top-ranked features. Twelve ML models, including k-Nearest Neighbors (kNN), Decision Trees, Support Vector Machines (SVM), Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD), Random Forest, Neural Networks, and Gradient Boosting, were evaluated using 10-fold cross-validation. Classification accuracy was tested across incremental feature subsets derived from rankings. The Neural Network achieved the highest accuracy (94.1%) using all 20 features, followed by Gradient Boosting (93.2%) and Random Forest (93.0%). Models showed improved performance as more features were incorporated, with SGD and ensemble methods demonstrating robustness to missing data. Feature ranking highlighted the dominance of treatment service counts and annotation codes in distinguishing provider types, while demographic variables (AGE_GROUP, CALENDAR_YEAR) had minimal impact. The study underscores the importance of feature selection in enhancing model efficiency and accuracy, particularly in imbalanced healthcare datasets. These findings advocate for integrating feature-ranking techniques with advanced ML algorithms to optimize dental provider classification, enabling targeted resource allocation for underserved populations.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.04474 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Ranked features https://doi.org/10.56294/dm2025755 7 Al-batah MSA-B, et al [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_1.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

100 extracted references · 23 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Consistently high scores across all methods except ANOVA, which is not applicable (NA) for this categorical analysis

    TXMT_USER_CNT (Row 1): highest Chi-Square value (59 036), indicating a strong association with the target variable. Consistently high scores across all methods except ANOVA, which is not applicable (NA) for this categorical analysis

  2. [2]

    TXMT_USER_ANNOTATION_CODE (Row 2): shows high relevance with scores like 0,000 across multiple methods, suggesting it’s a strong predictor

  3. [3]

    TXMT_SVC_CNT (Row 3): high Chi-Square (464 539) and consistent high scores, indicating its importance in classification

  4. [4]

    TXMT_SVC_ANNOTATION_CODE (Row 4): high ReliefF score (0,042), showing good discriminative power

  5. [5]

    RENDERING_NPI (Row 5): very low scores across all methods, suggesting it’s not a significant predictor in this context

  6. [6]

    PREV_USER_CNT (Row 6): moderate to high scores, indicating some relevance, with a notable Chi- Square of 225 181

  7. [7]

    PREV_USER_ANNOTATION_CODE (Row 7): high scores, particularly in Information Gain (0,000), indicating strong predictive power

  8. [8]

    PREV_SVC_CNT (Row 8): moderate scores, but still relevant with a Chi-Square of 149 387

Show all 100 references
  1. [9]

    PREV_SVC_ANNOTATION_CODE (Row 9): moderate relevance, with a ReliefF score of 0,024

  2. [10]

    EXAM_USER_CNT (Row 10): low scores across all methods, suggesting less importance

  3. [11]

    EXAM_USER_ANNOTATION_CODE (Row 11): very low scores, not significant

  4. [12]

    EXAM_SVC_CNT (Row 12): high Chi-Square (368 867), indicating relevance

  5. [13]

    EXAM_SVC_ANNOTATION_CODE (Row 13): negative ReliefF score (-0,002), suggesting it might not be useful or could be misleading

  6. [14]

    DELIVERY_SYSTEM (Row 14): high scores across all methods, particularly notable in Chi-Square (1556 771), indicating strong predictive capability

  7. [15]

    CALENDAR_YEAR (Row 15): very low scores, not significant

  8. [16]

    AGE_GROUP (Row 16): very low scores, suggesting minimal impact on classification

  9. [17]

    ADV_USER_CNT (Row 17): moderate scores, with a Chi-Square of 242 195

  10. [18]

    ADV_USER_ANNOTATION_CODE (Row 18): Very low scores, not significant

  11. [19]

    ADV_SVC_CNT (Row 19): moderate scores, with a Chi-Square of 374 977

  12. [20]

    ADV_SVC_ANNOTATION_CODE (Row 20): high scores, especially in ReliefF (0,034), indicate it’s a relevant feature. Key Observations: • Treatment Metrics (like TXMT_USER_CNT , TXMT_SVC_CNT) are among the top predictors across most methods, highlighting their significance in distin...

    2025

  13. [21]

    features Model/ Rank kNN Tree SVM SGD Random Forest Neural Network Naive Bayes Logistic Regression Gradient Boosting Constant CN2 rule inducer AdaBoost Rank (1) 0,808 0,811 0,627 0,811 0,804 0,811 0,811 0,811 0,811 0,811 0,811 0,805 Rank (1, 2) 0,808 0,811 0,627 0,811 0,804 0,...

  14. [23]

    Automated quantification of vesicoureteral reflux using machine learning with advancing diagnostic precision

    Alqaraleh M, Al-Batah M, Salem Alzboon M, Alzaghoul E. Automated quantification of vesicoureteral reflux using machine learning with advancing diagnostic precision. Data Metadata. 2025;4:460

    2025

  15. [24]

    Guardians of the Web: Harnessing Machine Learning to Combat Phishing Attacks

    Salem Alzboon M, Subhi Al-Batah M, Alqaraleh M, Alzboon F , Alzboon L. Guardians of the Web: Harnessing Machine Learning to Combat Phishing Attacks. Gamification Augment Real [Internet]. 2025 Jan;3:91. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.56294/gr202591

    2025 doi

  16. [25]

    From Complexity to Clarity: Improving Microarray Classification with Correlation-Based Feature Selection

    Alqaraleh M, Salem Alzboon M, Subhi Al-Batah M, Solayman Migdadi H. From Complexity to Clarity: Improving Microarray Classification with Correlation-Based Feature Selection. LatIA [Internet]. 2025 Jan 1;3:84. Available from: https://latia.ageditor.uy/index.php/latia/article/view/84

    2025

  17. [26]

    Phishing Website Detection Using Machine Learning

    Alzboon MS, Subhi Al-Batah M, Alqaraleh M, Alzboon F , Alzboon L. Phishing Website Detection Using Machine Learning. Gamification Augment Real [Internet]. 2025 Jan 16;3:81. Available from: http://dx.doi. org/10.56294/gr202581

    2025 doi

  18. [27]

    Optimizing Resource Discovery in Grid Computing: A Hierarchical and Weighted Approach with Behavioral Modeling

    Alqaraleh M, Salem Alzboon M, Mohammad SA-B. Optimizing Resource Discovery in Grid Computing: A Hierarchical and Weighted Approach with Behavioral Modeling. LatIA [Internet]. 2025 Jan 1;3:97. Available from: https://latia.ageditor.uy/index.php/latia/article/view/97

    2025

  19. [28]

    Real-Time UAV Recognition Through Advanced Machine Learning for Enhanced Military Surveillance

    Alqaraleh M, Salem Alzboon M, Subhi Al-Batah M. Real-Time UAV Recognition Through Advanced Machine Learning for Enhanced Military Surveillance. Gamification Augment Real [Internet]. 2025 Jan 1;3:63. Available from: https://gr.ageditor.ar/index.php/gr/article/view/63

    2025

  20. [29]

    AI Rx: Revolutionizing Healthcare Through Intelligence, Innovation, and Ethics

    Wahed MA, Alqaraleh M, Alzboon MS, Subhi Al-Batah M. AI Rx: Revolutionizing Healthcare Through Intelligence, Innovation, and Ethics. Semin Med Writ Educ [Internet]. 2025 Jan 1;4:35. Available from: https:// mw.ageditor.ar/index.php/mw/article/view/35

    2025

  21. [30]

    Application of Artificial Intelligence for Diagnosing Tumors in the Female Reproductive System: A Systematic Review

    Abdel Wahed M, Alqaraleh M, Salem Alzboon M, Subhi Al-Batah M. Application of Artificial Intelligence for Diagnosing Tumors in the Female Reproductive System: A Systematic Review. Multidiscip [Internet]. 2025 Jan 1;3:54. Available from: https://multidisciplinar.ageditor.uy/ind...

    2025

  22. [31]

    Evaluating AI and Machine Learning Models in Breast Cancer Detection: A Review of Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) and Global Research Trends

    Wahed MA, Alqaraleh M, Salem Alzboon M, Subhi Al-Batah M. Evaluating AI and Machine Learning Models in Breast Cancer Detection: A Review of Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) and Global Research Trends. LatIA [Internet]. 2025 Jan 1;3:117. Available from: https://latia.agedito...

    2025

  23. [32]

    Diabetes Prediction and Management Using Machine Learning Approaches

    Alzboon MS, Alqaraleh M, Al-Batah MS. Diabetes Prediction and Management Using Machine Learning Approaches. Data Metadata [Internet]. 2025; Available from: https://doi.org/10.56294/dm2025545

    2025 doi

  24. [33]

    Echoes in the Genome: Smoking’s Epigenetic Fingerprints and Bidirectional Neurobiological Pathways in Addiction and Disease

    Alqaraleh M, Al-Batah MS, Alzboon MS, Alzboon F , Alzboon L, Alamoush MN. Echoes in the Genome: Smoking’s Epigenetic Fingerprints and Bidirectional Neurobiological Pathways in Addiction and Disease. Semin Med Writ Educ [Internet]. 2025; Available from: https://doi.org/10.56294...

    2025 doi

  25. [34]

    From Puffs to Predictions: Leveraging AI, Wearables, and Biomolecular Signatures to Decode Smoking’s Multidimensional Impact on Cardiovascular Health

    Alqaraleh M, Al-Batah MS, Alzboon MS, Alzboon F , Alzboon L, Alamoush MN. From Puffs to Predictions: Leveraging AI, Wearables, and Biomolecular Signatures to Decode Smoking’s Multidimensional Impact on Cardiovascular Health. Semin Med Writ Educ [Internet]. 2025; Available from...

    2025

  26. [35]

    Comparative Study of Classification Mechanisms of Machine Learning on Multiple Data Mining Tool Kits

    Abuashour A, Salem Alzboon M, Kamel Alqaraleh M, Abuashour A. Comparative Study of Classification Mechanisms of Machine Learning on Multiple Data Mining Tool Kits. Am J Biomed Sci Res 2024 [Internet]. 2024;22(1):1. Available from: www.biomedgrid.com

    2024

  27. [36]

    AI in the Sky: Developing Real-Time UAV Recognition Systems to Enhance Military Security

    Mowafaq SA, Alqaraleh M, Al-Batah MS. AI in the Sky: Developing Real-Time UAV Recognition Systems to Enhance Military Security. Data Metadata. 2024;3:417

    2024

  28. [37]

    Skywatch: Advanced Machine Learning Techniques for Distinguishing UAVs from Birds in Airspace Security

    Alqaraleh M, Alzboon MS, Al-Batah MS. Skywatch: Advanced Machine Learning Techniques for Distinguishing UAVs from Birds in Airspace Security. Int J Adv Comput Sci Appl [Internet]. 2024;15(11). Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2024.01511104

    2024

  29. [42]

    The Role of Perceived Trust in Embracing Artificial Intelligence Technologies: Insights from Jordan’s SME Sector

    Alzboon MS, Al-Shorman HM, Alka’awneh SMN, Saatchi SG, Alqaraleh MKS, Samara EIM, et al. The Role of Perceived Trust in Embracing Artificial Intelligence Technologies: Insights from Jordan’s SME Sector. In: Studies in Computational Intelligence [Internet]. Springer Nature Swit...

    2024 doi

  30. [43]

    Automating Web Data Collection: Challenges, Solutions, and Python-Based Strategies for Effective Web Scraping

    Wahed MA, Alzboon MS, Alqaraleh M, Ayman J, Al-Batah M, Bader AF . Automating Web Data Collection: Challenges, Solutions, and Python-Based Strategies for Effective Web Scraping. In: 2024 7th International Conference on Internet Applications, Protocols, and Services, NETAPPS 20...

    2024

  31. [44]

    Comparative Analysis of Advanced Data Mining Methods for Enhancing Medical Diagnosis and Prognosis

    Al-Batah M, Salem Alzboon M, Alqaraleh M, Ahmad Alzaghoul F . Comparative Analysis of Advanced Data Mining Methods for Enhancing Medical Diagnosis and Prognosis. Data Metadata. 2024;3:465

    2024

  32. [45]

    Enhancing Internet-based Resource Discovery: The Efficacy of Distributed Quadtree Overlay

    Alqaraleh M. Enhancing Internet-based Resource Discovery: The Efficacy of Distributed Quadtree Overlay. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Applied Artificial Intelligence and Computing, ICAAIC 2024. 2024. p. 1619–28

    2024

  33. [46]

    Prediction of wear of dental composite materials using machine learning algorithms

    Suryawanshi A, Behera N. Prediction of wear of dental composite materials using machine learning algorithms. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2024;27(3):400–10

    2024

  34. [47]

    Prediction of mechanical properties of dental composite materials using machine learning algorithms

    Suryawanshi A, Behera N. Prediction of mechanical properties of dental composite materials using machine learning algorithms. Materwiss Werksttech. 2023;54(11):1350–61

    2023

  35. [48]

    Associations of Preterm Birth with Dental and Gastrointestinal Diseases: Machine Learning Analysis Using National Health Insurance Data

    Song IS, Choi ES, Kim ES, Hwang Y , Lee KS, Ahn KH. Associations of Preterm Birth with Dental and Gastrointestinal Diseases: Machine Learning Analysis Using National Health Insurance Data. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023;20(3)

    2023

  36. [49]

    Implementation of machine learning models as a quantitative evaluation tool for preclinical studies in dental education

    Oguzhan A, Peskersoy C, Devrimci EE, Kemaloglu H, Onder TK. Implementation of machine learning models as a quantitative evaluation tool for preclinical studies in dental education. J Dent Educ. 2024

    2024

  37. [50]

    Decoding children dental health risks: a machine learning approach to identifying key influencing factors

    Sadegh-Zadeh SA, Bagheri M, Saadat M. Decoding children dental health risks: a machine learning approach to identifying key influencing factors. Front Artif Intell. 2024;7

    2024

  38. [51]

    Segmentation and Classification of Dental Caries in Cone Beam Tomography Images Using Machine Learning and Image Processing

    Zanini LG, Rubira-Bullen IR, Nunes F de L. Segmentation and Classification of Dental Caries in Cone Beam Tomography Images Using Machine Learning and Image Processing. In: International Joint Conference on Biomedical Engineering Systems and Technologies. 2024. p. 428–35

    2024

  39. [53]

    Automated Dental Cavity Detection Using Machine Learning

    More PP . Automated Dental Cavity Detection Using Machine Learning. Int J Res Appl Sci Eng Technol. 2024;12(1):849–53

    2024

  40. [54]

    Influence of Intraoral Scanners, Operators, and Data Processing on Dimensional Accuracy of Dental Casts for Unsupervised Clinical Machine Learning: An in Vitro Comparative Study

    Farook TH, Ahmed S, Giri J, Rashid F , Hughes T , Dudley J. Influence of Intraoral Scanners, Operators, and Data Processing on Dimensional Accuracy of Dental Casts for Unsupervised Clinical Machine Learning: An in Vitro Comparative Study. Int J Dent. 2023;2023

    2023

  41. [55]

    Optimal Feature Selection-Based Dental Caries Prediction Model Using Machine Learning for Decision Support System

    Kang IA, Njimbouom SN, Kim JD. Optimal Feature Selection-Based Dental Caries Prediction Model Using Machine Learning for Decision Support System. Bioengineering. 2023;10(2)

    2023

  42. [56]

    Early Childhood Predictors for Dental Caries: A Machine Learning Approach

    Toledo Reyes L, Knorst JK, Ortiz FR, Brondani B, Emmanuelli B, Saraiva Guedes R, et al. Early Childhood Predictors for Dental Caries: A Machine Learning Approach. J Dent Res. 2023;102(9):999–1006

    2023

  43. [57]

    Logistic Regression Analysis of LC- MS/MS Data of Monomers Eluted from Aged Dental Composites: A Supervised Machine-Learning Approach

    Chen CC, Mondal K, Vervliet P , Covaci A, O’Brien EP , Rockne KJ, et al. Logistic Regression Analysis of LC- MS/MS Data of Monomers Eluted from Aged Dental Composites: A Supervised Machine-Learning Approach. Anal Chem. 2023;95(12):5205–13

    2023

  44. [58]

    Kwack DW, Park SM. Prediction of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) using automated machine learning in patients with osteoporosis associated with dental extraction and implantation: a retrospective study. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2023;49(3):135–41

    2023

  45. [59]

    Obstructive Sleep Apnea, Metabolic Dysfunction, and Periodontitis—Machine Learning and Statistical Analyses of the Dental, Oral, Medical Epidemiological (DOME) Big Data Study

    Ytzhaik N, Zur D, Goldstein C, Almoznino G. Obstructive Sleep Apnea, Metabolic Dysfunction, and Periodontitis—Machine Learning and Statistical Analyses of the Dental, Oral, Medical Epidemiological (DOME) Big Data Study. Metabolites. 2023;13(5)

    2023

  46. [60]

    Fairness of Machine Learning Algorithms for Predicting Foregone Preventive Dental Care for Adults

    Schuch HS, Furtado M, Silva GFDS, Kawachi I, Chiavegatto Filho ADP , Elani HW. Fairness of Machine Learning Algorithms for Predicting Foregone Preventive Dental Care for Adults. JAMA Netw Open. 2023;6(11):E2341625

    2023

  47. [61]

    Machine Learning Analysis of Microtensile Bond Strength of Dental Adhesives

    Wang R, Hass V , Wang Y . Machine Learning Analysis of Microtensile Bond Strength of Dental Adhesives. J Dent Res. 2023;102(9):1022–30

    2023

  48. [62]

    Gender Estimation with Parameters Obtained From the Upper Dental Arcade by Using Machine Learning Algorithms and Artificial Neural Networks

    Erkartal HŞ, Tatlı M, Secgin Y , Toy S, Duman BS. Gender Estimation with Parameters Obtained From the Upper Dental Arcade by Using Machine Learning Algorithms and Artificial Neural Networks. Eur J Ther. 2023;29(3):352–8

    2023

  49. [63]

    Machine learning assessment of dental age classification based on cone-beam CT images: a different approach

    Dogan OB, Boyacioglu H, Goksuluk D. Machine learning assessment of dental age classification based on cone-beam CT images: a different approach. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2024;53(1):67–73

    2024

  50. [64]

    Enhanced Resource Discovery Algorithm for Efficient Grid Computing

    Alqaraleh M. Enhanced Resource Discovery Algorithm for Efficient Grid Computing. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Applied Artificial Intelligence and Computing, ICAAIC 2024. 2024. p. 925–31

    2024

  51. [65]

    Advanced Landslide Detection Using Machine Learning and Remote Sensing Data

    Al-Batah MS, Salem Alzboon M, Solayman Migdadi H, Alkhasawneh M, Alqaraleh M. Advanced Landslide Detection Using Machine Learning and Remote Sensing Data. Data Metadata [Internet]. 2024 Oct 7;1. Available from: https://dm.ageditor.ar/index.php/dm/article/view/419/782

    2024

  52. [66]

    Advanced ensemble machine learning techniques for optimizing diabetes mellitus prognostication: A detailed examination of hospital data

    Al-Shanableh N, Alzyoud M, Al-Husban RY , Alshanableh NM, Al-Oun A, Al-Batah MS, et al. Advanced ensemble machine learning techniques for optimizing diabetes mellitus prognostication: A detailed examination of hospital data. Data Metadata. 2024;3:363

    2024

  53. [67]

    Enhancing Image Cryptography Performance with Block Left Rotation Operations

    Al-Batah MS, Alzboon MS, Alzyoud M, Al-Shanableh N. Enhancing Image Cryptography Performance with Block Left Rotation Operations. Appl Comput Intell Soft Comput. 2024;2024(1):3641927

    2024

  54. [68]

    Harnessing Machine Learning for Quantifying Vesicoureteral Reflux: A Promising Approach for Objective Assessment

    Alqaraleh M, Alzboon MS, Al-Batah MS, Wahed MA, Abuashour A, Alsmadi FH. Harnessing Machine Learning for Quantifying Vesicoureteral Reflux: A Promising Approach for Objective Assessment. Int J online Biomed Eng. 2024;20(11):123–45

    2024

  55. [69]

    Advancing Medical Image Analysis: The Role of Adaptive Optimization Techniques in Enhancing COVID-19 Detection, Lung Infection, and Tumor Segmentation

    Muhyeeddin A, Mowafaq SA, Al-Batah MS, Mutaz AW. Advancing Medical Image Analysis: The Role of Adaptive Optimization Techniques in Enhancing COVID-19 Detection, Lung Infection, and Tumor Segmentation. Data and Metadata. 2025; 4:755 14 LatIA [Internet]. 2024 Sep 29;2(74):74. Av...

    2025

  56. [70]

    Doctor Adam Talib’s Public Relations Strategy in Improving the Quality of Patient Service

    Putri AK, Alzboon MS. Doctor Adam Talib’s Public Relations Strategy in Improving the Quality of Patient Service. Sinergi Int J Commun Sci. 2023;1(1):42–54

    2023

  57. [71]

    Intelligent Heart Disease Prediction System with Applications in Jordanian Hospitals

    Al-Batah MS, Alzboon MS, Alazaidah R. Intelligent Heart Disease Prediction System with Applications in Jordanian Hospitals. Int J Adv Comput Sci Appl. 2023;14(9):508–17

    2023

  58. [72]

    Prostate Cancer Detection and Analysis using Advanced Machine Learning

    Alzboon MS, Al-Batah MS. Prostate Cancer Detection and Analysis using Advanced Machine Learning. Int J Adv Comput Sci Appl. 2023;14(8):388–96

    2023

  59. [73]

    The Two Sides of AI in Cybersecurity: Opportunities and Challenges

    Alzboon MS, Bader AF , Abuashour A, Alqaraleh MK, Zaqaibeh B, Al-Batah M. The Two Sides of AI in Cybersecurity: Opportunities and Challenges. In: Proceedings of 2023 2nd International Conference on Intelligent Computing and Next Generation Networks, ICNGN 2023. 2023

    2023

  60. [74]

    A Comparative Study of Machine Learning Techniques for Early Prediction of Diabetes

    Alzboon MS, Al-Batah M, Alqaraleh M, Abuashour A, Bader AF . A Comparative Study of Machine Learning Techniques for Early Prediction of Diabetes. In: 2023 IEEE 10th International Conference on Communications and Networking, ComNet 2023 - Proceedings. 2023. p. 1–12

    2023

  61. [75]

    A Comparative Study of Machine Learning Techniques for Early Prediction of Prostate Cancer

    Alzboon MS, Al-Batah M, Alqaraleh M, Abuashour A, Bader AF . A Comparative Study of Machine Learning Techniques for Early Prediction of Prostate Cancer. In: 2023 IEEE 10th International Conference on Communications and Networking, ComNet 2023 - Proceedings. 2023. p. 1–12

    2023

  62. [76]

    Machine Learning Classification Algorithms for Accurate Breast Cancer Diagnosis

    Alzboon MS, Qawasmeh S, Alqaraleh M, Abuashour A, Bader AF , Al-Batah M. Machine Learning Classification Algorithms for Accurate Breast Cancer Diagnosis. In: 2023 3rd International Conference on Emerging Smart Technologies and Applications, eSmarTA 2023. 2023

    2023

  63. [77]

    Early Diagnosis of Diabetes: A Comparison of Machine Learning Methods

    Alzboon MS, Al-Batah MS, Alqaraleh M, Abuashour A, Bader AFH. Early Diagnosis of Diabetes: A Comparison of Machine Learning Methods. Int J online Biomed Eng. 2023;19(15):144–65

    2023

  64. [78]

    Pushing the Envelope: Investigating the Potential and Limitations of ChatGPT and Artificial Intelligence in Advancing Computer Science Research

    Alzboon MS, Qawasmeh S, Alqaraleh M, Abuashour A, Bader AF , Al-Batah M. Pushing the Envelope: Investigating the Potential and Limitations of ChatGPT and Artificial Intelligence in Advancing Computer Science Research. In: 2023 3rd International Conference on Emerging Smart Tec...

    2023

  65. [79]

    Survey on Patient Health Monitoring System Based on Internet of Things

    Alzboon MS. Survey on Patient Health Monitoring System Based on Internet of Things. Inf Sci Lett. 2022;11(4):1183–90

    2022

  66. [80]

    Semantic Text Analysis on Social Networks and Data Processing: Review and Future Directions

    Alzboon M. Semantic Text Analysis on Social Networks and Data Processing: Review and Future Directions. Inf Sci Lett. 2022;11(5):1371–84

    2022

  67. [81]

    Nodexl Tool for Social Network Analysis

    Alzboon MS, Aljarrah E, Alqaraleh M, Alomari SA. Nodexl Tool for Social Network Analysis. Turkish J Comput Math Educ. 2021;12(14):202–16

    2021

  68. [82]

    Enhanced logistics information service systems performance: using theoretical model and cybernetics’ principles

    Alomari SA, Salaimeh S Al, Jarrah E Al, Alzboon MS. Enhanced logistics information service systems performance: using theoretical model and cybernetics’ principles. WSEAS Trans Bus Econ [Internet]. 2020 Apr;17:278–87. Available from: https://wseas.com/journals/bae/2020/a585107-896.pdf

    2020

  69. [83]

    A novel adaptive schema to facilitates playback switching technique for video delivery in dense LTE cellular heterogeneous network environments

    Alomari SA, Alzboon MS, Al-Batah MS, Zaqaibeh B. A novel adaptive schema to facilitates playback switching technique for video delivery in dense LTE cellular heterogeneous network environments. Int J Electr Comput Eng [Internet]. 2020 Oct;10(5):5347. Available from: http://ije...

    2020

  70. [84]

    Toward achieving self-resource discovery in distributed systems based on distributed quadtree

    Alomari SA, Alqaraleh M, Aljarrah E, Alzboon MS. Toward achieving self-resource discovery in distributed systems based on distributed quadtree. J Theor Appl Inf Technol. 2020;98(20):3088–99

    2020

  71. [85]

    Resource discovery mechanisms in shared computing infrastructure: A survey

    Alzboon MS, Mahmuddin M, Arif S. Resource discovery mechanisms in shared computing infrastructure: A survey. In: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing. 2020. p. 545–56. https://doi.org/10.56294/dm2025755 15 Al-batah MSA-B, et al https://doi.org/10.56294/dm2025755

    2020 doi

  72. [86]

    Evaluation of knowledge quality in the E -learning system

    Shawawreh S, Alomari SA, Alzboon MS, Al Salaimeh S. Evaluation of knowledge quality in the E -learning system. Int J Eng Res Technol. 2019;12(4):548–53

    2019

  73. [87]

    An Effective Self-Adaptive Policy for Optimal Video Quality over Heterogeneous Mobile Devices and Network Discovery Services

    Alomari, Alzboon, Zaqaibeh, Al-Batah, Saleh Ali, Mowafaq Salem, Belal MS. An Effective Self-Adaptive Policy for Optimal Video Quality over Heterogeneous Mobile Devices and Network Discovery Services. Appl Math Inf Sci [Internet]. 2019 May;13(3):489–505. Available from: http://...

    2019

  74. [88]

    An advanced emergency warning message scheme based on vehicles speed and traffic densities

    Banikhalaf M, Alomari SA, Alzboon MS. An advanced emergency warning message scheme based on vehicles speed and traffic densities. Int J Adv Comput Sci Appl. 2019;10(5):201–5

    2019

  75. [89]

    Internet of things between reality or a wishing - list : a survey

    Alzboon MS. Internet of things between reality or a wishing - list : a survey. Int J Eng \& Technol. 2019;7(June):956–61

    2019

  76. [90]

    Gene Microarray Cancer classification using correlation based feature selection algorithm and rules classifiers

    Al-Batah M, Zaqaibeh B, Alomari SA, Alzboon MS. Gene Microarray Cancer classification using correlation based feature selection algorithm and rules classifiers. Int J online Biomed Eng. 2019;15(8):62–73

    2019

  77. [91]

    The modern hosting computing systems for small and medium businesses

    Al Tal S, Al Salaimeh S, Ali Alomari S, Alqaraleh M. The modern hosting computing systems for small and medium businesses. Acad Entrep J. 2019;25(4):1–7

    2019

  78. [92]

    Alzboon MS, Alomari S, Al-Batah MS, Alomari SA, Banikhalaf M. The characteristics of the green internet of things and big data in building safer, smarter, and sustainable cities Vehicle Detection and Tracking for Aerial Surveillance Videos View project Evaluation of Knowledge ...

    2017

  79. [93]

    Distributed quadtree overlay for resource discovery in shared computing infrastructure

    Arif S, Alzboon MS, Mahmuddin M. Distributed quadtree overlay for resource discovery in shared computing infrastructure. Adv Sci Lett. 2017;23(6):5397–401

    2017

  80. [94]

    Dynamic network topology for resource discovery in shared computing infrastructure

    Mahmuddin M, Alzboon MS, Arif S. Dynamic network topology for resource discovery in shared computing infrastructure. Adv Sci Lett. 2017;23(6):5402–5

    2017

  81. [95]

    Mahmuddin ASCA

    Mowafaq Salem Alzboon M. Mahmuddin ASCA. Challenges and Mitigation Techniques of Grid Resource Management System. In: National Workshop on FUTURE INTERNET RESEARCH (FIRES2016). 2016. p. 1–6

    2016

  82. [96]

    Ranked features selection with MSBRG algorithm and rules classifiers for cervical cancer

    Al-Batah MS. Ranked features selection with MSBRG algorithm and rules classifiers for cervical cancer. Int J Online Biomed Eng. 2019;15(12):4

    2019

  83. [97]

    Integrating the principal component analysis with partial decision tree in microarray gene data

    Al-Batah MS. Integrating the principal component analysis with partial decision tree in microarray gene data. IJCSNS Int J Comput Sci Netw Secur. 2019;19(3):24-29

    2019

  84. [98]

    Towards self-resource discovery and selection models in grid computing

    Alzboon MS, Arif AS, Mahmuddin M. Towards self-resource discovery and selection models in grid computing. ARPN J Eng Appl Sci. 2016;11(10):6269–74

    2016

  85. [99]

    An improved binary crow-JAYA optimisation system with various evolution operators, such as mutation for finding the max clique in the dense graph

    Al-Batah MS, Al-Eiadeh MR. An improved binary crow-JAYA optimisation system with various evolution operators, such as mutation for finding the max clique in the dense graph. Int J Comput Sci Math. 2024;19(4):327-38

    2024

  86. [100]

    Towards Self-Organizing Infrastructure : A New Architecture for Autonomic Green Cloud Data Centers

    Alzboon MS, Sintok UUM, Sintok UUM, Arif S. Towards Self-Organizing Infrastructure : A New Architecture for Autonomic Green Cloud Data Centers. ARPN J Eng Appl Sci. 2015;1–7

    2015

  87. [101]

    A Comparative Study on Deep Learning and Machine Learning Models for Human Action Recognition in Aerial Videos

    Kapoor S, Sharma A, Verma A, Dhull V , Goyal C. A Comparative Study on Deep Learning and Machine Learning Models for Human Action Recognition in Aerial Videos. Int Arab J Inf Technol [Internet]. 2023;20(4)

    2023

  88. [102]

    Testing the probability of heart disease using classification and regression tree model

    Al-Batah MS. Testing the probability of heart disease using classification and regression tree model. Annu Res Rev Biol. 2014;4(11):1713-25

    2014

  89. [103]

    Peer to Peer Resource Discovery Mechanisms in Grid Computing: A Critical Review

    SalemAlzboon, Mowafaq and Arif, Suki and Mahmuddin, M and Dakkak O. Peer to Peer Resource Discovery Mechanisms in Grid Computing: A Critical Review. In: The 4th International Conference on Internet Applications, Protocols and Services (NETAPPS2015). 2015. p. 48–54. Data and Me...

    2015

  90. [104]

    Modified recursive least squares algorithm to train the hybrid multilayered perceptron (HMLP) network

    Al-Batah MS. Modified recursive least squares algorithm to train the hybrid multilayered perceptron (HMLP) network. Appl Soft Comput. 2010;10(1):236-44

    2010

  91. [105]

    An improved discreet Jaya optimisation algorithm with mutation operator and opposition-based learning to solve the 0-1 knapsack problem

    Al-Batah MS, Al-Eiadeh MR. An improved discreet Jaya optimisation algorithm with mutation operator and opposition-based learning to solve the 0-1 knapsack problem. Int J Math Oper Res. 2023;26(2):143-69

    2023

  92. [106]

    Towards autonomic overlay self-load balancing

    Al-Oqily I, Alzboon M, Al-Shemery H, Alsarhan A. Towards autonomic overlay self-load balancing. In: 2013 10th International Multi-Conference on Systems, Signals and Devices, SSD 2013. Ieee; 2013. p. 1–6. FINANCING This work is supported from Jadara University, Zarqa University...

    2013

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.