Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 161 references

Radio prospects of extrasolar aurorae polaris as a probe of planetary magnetism

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A Jupiter-calibrated emission model predicts that 16 confirmed exoplanets, led by tau Boötis b at 51 mJy, should be radio-detectable with current ground-based arrays.

desk verdict A transparent, reproducible target list for exoplanet radio searches, but the 16-candidate claim depends on efficiency scalings that could plausibly be off by an order of magnitude. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.04604 v1 pith:YLFYRWYU submitted 2025-06-05 astro-ph.EP astro-ph.IM

Asaf Kaya , Tansu Daylan This is my paper
classification astro-ph.EPastro-ph.IM
keywords exoplanetsauroralradioemissionelectroncyclotronmaserinstabilityplanetarymagneticfieldsRadiometricBode'sLawstellarwindlow-frequencytelescopessuper-Earths
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tries to establish that the magnetic fields of exoplanets are within reach of current radio telescopes, by rebuilding the emission calculation from the ground up and being honest about the uncertainties. It models Electron Cyclotron Maser radio emission through the Radiometric Bode's Law, with input power from both the kinetic and the magnetic energy of the stellar wind, and propagates the errors on planetary and stellar parameters with a Monte Carlo scheme. The result is a ranked list: 16 of 1,579 confirmed exoplanets have predicted fluxes above the 5-$\sigma$ sensitivity of LOFAR, NenuFAR, MWA, or uGMRT, with the hot Jupiter tau Boötis b the most favorable at $51^{+36}_{-22}$ mJy. Eleven of the sixteen are super-Earths and sub-Neptunes, the planets whose magnetism most directly bears on atmospheric escape and the radius gap. If the model is right, these are the targets for the first detection of exoplanetary magnetism.

What carries the argument

The chain of calculation runs through four linked components. Radiometric Bode's Law ($P_{\rm rad} = \epsilon P_{\rm in}$) converts the incident stellar-wind power into radio power, with two efficiencies calibrated on Jupiter, one for kinetic energy ($\epsilon_{\rm kin} = 1.5\times10^{-6}$) and one for magnetic energy ($\epsilon_{\rm mag} = 6.4\times10^{-5}$), combined as the average of the two channels. The maximum emission frequency is set by the electron cyclotron frequency at the magnetic pole, $\nu_{\rm max} = 2.8\,{\rm MHz}\,(B_{\rm pole}/{\rm G})$, so the predicted frequency is a direct measure of the polar field. A dynamo scaling law for the magnetic moment, together with a pressure-balance equation for the magnetopause standoff distance, turns mass, radius, rotation rate, and core properties into the field and magnetosphere size that feed the first two equations. The stellar wind is computed from an isothermal wind solution anchored to stellar age, with a spiral structure for the interplanetary magnetic field tied to stellar rotation, and a Monte Carlo error propagation carries the input uncertainties through the whole chain to produce median and percentile flux and frequency estimates for every planet.

What would settle it

A decisive test is a deep, multi-epoch radio campaign: observe the top four candidates (tau Boötis b, TOI-2109 b, WASP-18 b, and V1298 Tau c) with NenuFAR, LOFAR, and MWA in their predicted bands to 5-sigma sensitivities at least a factor of three below the predicted fluxes, and check for circularly polarized bursts; if all four show nothing, the universal-efficiency assumption fails, whereas a single detection would validate the pipeline's ranking.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central result is that exoplanetary auroral radio emission is not just a theoretical expectation but a concrete observing program: applying a Jupiter-calibrated Radiometric Bode's Law, an isothermal stellar wind model, and a published dynamo scaling law to 1,579 confirmed exoplanets, the authors identify 16 systems whose CMI-driven burst emission should exceed the sensitivity limits of current ground-based low-frequency arrays. The most favorable is tau Boötis b, with a predicted peak flux density of $51^{+36}_{-22}$ mJy at a maximum emission frequency of 48 MHz. Notably, eleven of the sixteen candidates are super-Earths and sub-Neptunes, a class that has not dominated previous predictive lists; their magnetism is directly relevant to whether photoevaporation, core-powered mass loss, or gas-poor formation sculpts the small-planet radius distribution. The paper also lists the five brightest sub-10 MHz sources for future space-based observations.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that Jupiter's radio-emitting efficiency and the dynamo scaling law apply unchanged to all 1,579 planets, including tidally locked super-Earths and sub-Neptunes whose rotation rates and internal structures are inferred rather than measured; if those small planets convert wind power into radio emission less efficiently than Jupiter does, the predicted fluxes are overestimates and the candidate list shrinks.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Deeper observations of tau Boötis b in the 14-52 MHz range, where previous upper limits are still above the predicted 51 mJy flux, could produce the first confirmed detection of exoplanetary magnetic emission.
  • A detection from any of the eleven super-Earth or sub-Neptune candidates would directly measure the magnetic moment of a small planet and test whether the dynamo scaling used here extends below the gas-giant regime.
  • Non-detections of the small, close-in candidates, as a class, would be consistent with the photoevaporation scenario in which stripped planets have weak dynamos, while several detections would challenge that explanation.
  • The five brightest sub-10 MHz sources provide a short target list for planned space-based or lunar low-frequency arrays that can see below the ionosphere.
  • For the four candidates already observed, the published upper limits do not conflict with the predictions because they were taken at higher frequencies; the paper's numbers specify where to re-observe.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the efficiency of the small-planet magnetosphere is lower than Jupiter's, for instance because magnetospheric convection saturates or the emission is trapped by an extended ionosphere as the paper itself lists as limitations, the predicted fluxes for the super-Earth candidates would drop, but the gas-giant targets like tau Boötis b would survive, so the rankings are more robust for the giants t
  • A natural extension would be to fold free-free absorption and beaming-cone geometry into the Monte Carlo pipeline for individual systems, turning the current answer into a per-planet detection probability across orbital phase.
  • The paper's demographic implication is the sharpest testable one: a statistically significant set of detections among the super-Earth candidates would argue that strong fields can coexist with the small-planet radius valley, weakening the photoevaporation-only interpretation, while a clean set of non-detections would strengthen it.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. This paper constructs a numerical model to predict electron cyclotron maser (CMI) radio emission from exoplanets, combining a Radiometric Bode's Law (RBL) scaling with a Parker stellar wind model and a Mizutani dynamo scaling law to estimate planetary magnetic moments. The model is applied to 1579 confirmed exoplanets within 300 pc, with Monte Carlo propagation of catalog parameter uncertainties and power-law exponent uncertainties. The central result is a list of 16 candidates that are claimed to be potentially detectable with current ground-based facilities (LOFAR, NenuFAR, MWA, uGMRT), headed by tau Boötis b at a predicted flux density of 51+36/-22 mJy and a cutoff frequency of 48 MHz. Eleven of the candidates are super-Earths and sub-Neptunes. The paper also lists five sub-10 MHz candidates for future space-based facilities, compares its predictions to previous modeling work and to existing radio upper limits, and discusses implications for photoevaporation-driven demographics. The code pipeline (Aegis) is publicly available, and machine-readable tables are promised.

Significance. If the underlying RBL and dynamo scalings are accepted, the paper provides a genuinely useful target list for low-frequency radio campaigns, and the Monte Carlo treatment is a meaningful step beyond point estimates: it gives the community a transparent, reproducible ranking of systems with per-object percentiles. The inclusion of eleven super-Earths/sub-Neptunes is notable, as magnetism in that regime is directly relevant to atmospheric retention and demographics. The paper is also commendably explicit about its theoretical limitations in Section 5.4, and the public code strengthens reproducibility. However, the headline candidate list is only as strong as the unverified efficiency, beaming, and dynamo assumptions; the significance is therefore conditional on robustness checks that are not yet Quantitative in the manuscript.

major comments (3)
  1. [5.4, Eqs. (4) and (25), Table 1] The paper itself concedes that magnetospheric convection saturation (Nichols & Milan 2016) and ionospheric trapping (Weber et al. 2017, 2018) can make RBL predictions overestimates for hot Jupiters, yet the reported error bars propagate only catalog parameter uncertainties and power-law exponent uncertainties. All fluxes in Table 1 scale linearly with epsilon_mag and epsilon_kin, so a factor-of-10 reduction—within the range suggested by the cited saturation models—would move tau Boo b from ~51 mJy to ~5 mJy and would push every super-Earth/sub-Neptune candidate below the ~10 mJy sensitivity thresholds, eliminating the candidate list. The authors should add a sensitivity analysis that re-runs the model with reduced efficiencies (e.g., epsilon/3, epsilon/10) and reports the surviving candidates and revised fluxes, or explicitly reframe the predictions as upper limits.
  2. [4.1, Table 1] The candidate selection criterion of requiring the emission frequency distribution to fall 'at least 30%' into one of the observation bands is arbitrary and is not equivalent to a detection significance. Five of the 16 candidates (HS Psc b, GJ 674 b, HD 80653 b, TOI-1444 b, HD 213885 b) are included even though their median predicted frequencies lie outside all bands and only 30% of their posterior overlaps a band. This criterion directly sets the headline count of 16; the paper should adopt a quantitative detectability metric (e.g., the fraction of the posterior above a facility's 5-sigma sensitivity within a band) or provide a physical justification for the 30% threshold.
  3. [2.5, Eq. (25)] The dynamo scaling law is calibrated on solar system bodies, but for the 11 super-Earth/sub-Neptune candidates the convective core radius scaling (Eq. 26) is extrapolated from Mercury, Earth, Jupiter, and Saturn, the core density is set to the mean planetary density, and the core conductivity is set to Jupiter's value. The Monte Carlo varies the input parameters but not the functional form of the scaling law, and Section 5 notes that alternative dynamo scalings (Busse 1976; Sano 1993) give significantly different results. Since the magnetic field strength enters the flux through the magnetopause standoff distance (Eq. 30), the authors should test the stability of the 16-candidate list under alternative dynamo scalings, or at least report the dispersion in predicted magnetic moments induced by the choice of scaling law.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Eq. (7)] The flux density formula is written as 'Phi = P_rad / (Omega D_*^2 Delta_nu) [10^26 Jy]', which is dimensionally confusing; please write the explicit conversion factor or state that Phi is in Jy after multiplying by 10^26.
  2. [Section 3 and Figure 6] The text says 'the percentile limits are those obtained from the standard deviation of the normal distribution,' but the paper reports asymmetric 16th/84th percentile error bars; please clarify that these are empirical percentiles of the Monte Carlo posterior rather than standard-deviation limits.
  3. [Table 2] The five sub-10 MHz candidates are listed without uncertainties, although the text notes that their emission characteristics contain large uncertainties; please add at least indicative ranges or a reference to the machine-readable table.
  4. [Figure 10 caption] The caption says the radius valley and lack of short-period Neptune-sized planets are illustrated in 'the right panel of the Moderate flux group,' which is inconsistent with the description of three flux groups (Low/Moderate/High); please clarify which panel is being referenced.
  5. [Section 4.2 and Table 1] The sensitivity limits are quoted for a common 8-hour integration time, but several targets have t20deg values shorter than 8 hours (e.g., GJ 876 d with 4h 58m and 55 Cnc e with 6h 0m); the effective sensitivity for these targets should be recomputed or stated as a caveat in the telescope column.
  6. [Title] The phrase 'aurorae polaris' is not defined in the text; consider using standard terminology such as 'polar auroral radio emission' or explain the phrase at first use.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the candidate radio fluxes are forward-model outputs from literature-calibrated scalings, not fits to the candidate systems.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is a forward model. The two Radiometric Bode's Law efficiencies are fixed before any exoplanet predictions are made by scaling Jovian radio emission (Eqs. 1-4: eps_mag = 6.4e-5, eps_kin = 1.5e-6), the dynamo scaling is taken from Mizutani et al. (1992, Eq. 25), and the stellar wind, mass-loss, and magnetic field relations are literature calibrations (Parker 1958; Wood et al. 2002; Alvarado-Gomez et al. 2016; Vidotto et al. 2014). None of the 1579 exoplanet parameters or the 16 candidate flux densities are used to adjust these constants, so the candidate list is an external output. The only self-citations, Kaya & Daylan (2025) for the Aegis pipeline and Daylan et al. (2021) as a TESS sample paper, are not load-bearing for the radio predictions. Section 5.4 candidly lists external theoretical threats (Nichols & Milan 2016 saturation; Weber et al. 2017/2018 ionospheric trapping; Kavanagh & Vidotto 2020 free-free absorption) that could make the predicted fluxes overestimates; this is a robustness limitation, not a circularity. The paper also compares its predictions to existing upper limits in Section 5.2, providing an external benchmark. The main risk is that Jupiter-calibrated efficiencies and solar-system dynamo scalings may not transfer to close-in synchronized super-Earths, but that is a modeling uncertainty, not an equivalence between inputs and outputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 9 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The model is an assembled chain of empirically calibrated scaling laws from solar system and solar observations. No new physical entities are introduced. The central predictions therefore inherit the combined uncertainty of these external calibrations, which are not all propagated into the reported error bars.

free parameters (6)
  • epsilon_mag (magnetic efficiency) = 6.4e-5
    Jovian RBL efficiency for magnetic energy input, from P. Zarka et al. (2004), used in Equation 4.
  • epsilon_kin (kinetic efficiency) = 1.5e-6
    Jovian RBL efficiency for kinetic wind energy input, from P. Zarka et al. (2004), used in Equation 4.
  • Beaming solid angle Omega = 1.6 sr
    Solid angle of CMI emission cone from Cassini observations of Jupiter (Zarka et al. 2004), used in Equation 7.
  • Burst factor = 10
    Multiplies average flux density to estimate peak 'burst' emission, following observed Jovian variability (Section 2.3).
  • Convective core radius scaling normalization = 0.830 R_J
    Jovian convective dynamo region radius from Sharan et al. (2022), used to scale Equations 26 and 27.
  • Solar wind constants v0 and tau = 3971 km/s, 2.56e7 yr
    Newkirk (1980) age-activity scaling used to set wind speed at 1 AU, Equation 12.
assumptions (9)
  • domain assumption Radiometric Bode's Law: P_rad = epsilon * P_in with a constant efficiency (Equation 1).
    Adopted from Desch and Kaiser (1984); central relation between stellar wind power and radio output.
  • domain assumption Jovian efficiencies epsilon_mag and epsilon_kin apply to all exoplanets, combined as P_rad = 0.5*(epsilon_kin P_in,kin + epsilon_mag P_in,mag) (Equation 4).
    Assumes the two stellar wind energy inputs are independent and equally weighted; no exoplanet data calibrate these values.
  • domain assumption Parker isothermal stellar wind model with the Newkirk age-velocity scaling describes wind speed for F, G, K and M stars (Equations 9-12).
    Adopted from Parker (1958) and Newkirk (1980), following Grießmeier et al. (2007a).
  • domain assumption Mass-loss rate scales with X-ray flux as Mdot proportional to F_X^0.79 and with age as t^-1.37 (Equations 16-17).
    Adopted from Alvarado-Gómez et al. (2016a) and Ayres (1997); uncertain for high-activity and M dwarf stars.
  • domain assumption Surface magnetic field of the star scales with age as <|B_V|> proportional to t^-0.655, scaled to solar values (Equation 23).
    Adopted from Vidotto et al. (2014); the authors note M dwarf fields are underestimated.
  • domain assumption Planetary magnetic moment follows the Mizutani et al. (1992) scaling law with core density equal to mean density and conductivity equal to Jupiter's (Equation 25).
    Core properties are not observable; these simplifying assignments set the magnetic field strengths.
  • domain assumption Close-in planets (a < 0.1 AU) are tidally synchronized and rotate with their orbital period; other planets are assigned rotation from a solar-system kernel density estimate (Section 2.5).
    Rotation rates are mostly unmeasured; this choice strongly affects the magnetic field and emission frequency for super-Earths.
  • domain assumption CMI emission is beamed into a fixed solid angle Omega = 1.6 sr with no dependence on orbital phase or viewing geometry (Equation 7).
    Adopted from Jupiter's average beaming; the paper notes the hollow cone geometry is only illustrative and Earth may lie outside the beam.
  • domain assumption Emission escapes if the cyclotron frequency exceeds the plasma frequency at the planet's orbital radius; free-free absorption along the line of sight and ionospheric trapping are neglected (Equation 6, Section 5.4).
    The authors acknowledge that dense wind regions, orbital phase and extended ionospheres can absorb or trap the emission.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Radio prospects of extrasolar aurorae polaris as a probe of planetary magnetism." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/YLFYRWYU

@misc{pith2026250604604,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Radio prospects of extrasolar aurorae polaris as a probe of planetary magnetism},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/YLFYRWYU}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.04604}
}
abstract

Magnetized exoplanets are expected to emit auroral cyclotron radiation in the radio regime due to the interactions between their magnetospheres, the interplanetary magnetic field, and the stellar wind. Prospective extrasolar auroral emission detections will constrain the magnetic properties of exoplanets, allowing the assessment of the planets' habitability and their protection against atmospheric escape by photoevaporation, enhancing our understanding of exoplanet formation and demographics. We construct a numerical model to update the estimates of radio emission characteristics of the confirmed exoplanets while quantifying the uncertainties of our predictions for each system by implementing a Monte Carlo error propagation method. We identify 16 candidates that have expected emission characteristics that render them potentially detectable from current ground-based telescopes. Among these, the hot Jupiter tau Bootis b is the most favorable target with an expected flux density of $51^{+36}_{-22}$ mJy. Notably, eleven candidates are super-Earths and sub-Neptunes, for which magnetism is key to understanding the associated demographics. Together with the other predictive works in the literature regarding the characteristics and the geometry of the magnetospheric emissions, our predictions are expected to guide observational campaigns in pursuit of discovering magnetism on exoplanets.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.04604 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Schematic drawing of a magnetized planet experiencing pressure from the stellar wind flowing from the left side. The black magnetic field lines are drawn simply to indicate the dayside com￾pression and nightside elongation of the magnetosphere. Therefore, they are only representative and not calculated using MHD sim￾ulations. The magnetopause standoff distance and the associated latitude of emission are shown, along… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. 2D Sketch of the geometry of the interplanetary magnetic field and the related velocities, where the black dot represents the planet around its host star, which is assumed to reside in the opposite direction of 𝑣, the stellar wind flow. Effective wind speed incident on the planet is found from 𝑣®eff = 𝑣® − ®𝑣𝑘, orthogonal to which we calculate 𝐵⊥. This relation was scaled with the Sun using the solar mass loss rate … view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. The perpendicular component of the IMF of the Parker spiral model for the exoplanet tau Boo b. Encouraged by the observation of an agreeing trend in young solar-type stars found in a similar analysis in C. P. Folsom et al. (2016) on a narrower mass range, we scale Equation 23 with the solar parameters 𝑡⊙ = 4.6 Gyr and ⟨|𝐵𝑉 |⟩ = 1.89 G to obtain an estimate for 𝐵0. An important caveat associated with this approach is… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (6 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Distributions of some of the parameters of the exoplanets and their host stars in our sample. (2017), respectively. Finally, the thermal noise levels of the New Extension in Nançay Upgrading LOFAR (NenuFAR) were obtained through calculations of its system equivalent fl…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Distribution of the frequency and the flux density of the expected radio emissions from tau Boo b as an outcome of the error propagation method. The sixteenth and the eighty-fourth percentile lines correspond to the reported error bars of our predictions. Correct frequ…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The burst CMI-driven magnetospheric emission frequency and Earth-distance radio flux density of a sample of 1111 Exoplanets. The pair of thick horizontal and vertical error bars at the top right show the average uncertainty. Dot sizes indicate the distance from Earth t…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Section of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Sky coverage maps of the considered observatories LOFAR, NenuFAR, MWA, and uGMRT. Left: Plots for the maximum elevation of each point in the observer’s sky, Right: Time spent above 20° altitude at the observer’s sky. In all panels, the candidate exoplanets are marked w…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: The radius and magnetic field strength distributions of the close-in (𝑎 < 0.1 AU) exoplanets in the radius range 1–7 𝑅⊕. Three subsets are formed on the amount of X-ray flux incident on the planets: Low (< 10 𝐹𝑋,⊕), Moderate (10–100 𝐹𝑋,⊕), and High (> 100 𝐹𝑋,⊕), where…

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

161 extracted references · 11 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    c :@:H n aϿYX` m04 v sQm `YX `RY&<ݴ`V O[ f

    thebibliography [1] 20pt to REFERENCES 6pt =0pt \@twocolumntrue 12pt -12pt 10pt plus 3pt =0pt =0pt =1pt plus 1pt =0pt =0pt -12pt =13pt plus 1pt =20pt =13pt plus 1pt \@M =10000 =-1.0em =0pt =0pt 0pt =0pt =1.0em @enumiv\@empty 10000 10000 `\.\@m \@noitemerr \@latex@warning Empty `thebibliography' environment \@ifnextchar \@reference \@latexerr Missing key o...

    2017

  2. [2]

    Adams, F. C. 2011, title Magnetically controlled outflows from hot jupiters, Astrophysical Journal, 730, 10.1088/0004-637X/730/1/27

    doi:10.1088/0004-637x/730/1/27 2011

  3. [3]

    D., Hussain, G

    Alvarado-Gómez, J. D., Hussain, G. A., Cohen, O., et al. 2016 a , title Simulating the environment around planet-hosting stars: II. Stellar winds and inner astrospheres, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 594, 10.1051/0004-6361/201628988

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201628988 2016

  4. [4]

    D., Hussain, G

    Alvarado-Gómez, J. D., Hussain, G. A., Cohen, O., et al. 2016 b , title Simulating the environment around planet-hosting stars: I. Coronal structure, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 588, 10.1051/0004-6361/201527832

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201527832 2016

  5. [5]

    D., & Stevenson, K

    Ashtari, R., Sciola, A., Turner, J. D., & Stevenson, K. 2022, title Detecting Magnetospheric Radio Emission from Giant Exoplanets, The Astrophysical Journal, 939, 24, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac92f5

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac92f5 2022

  6. [6]

    Ayres, T. R. 1997, title Evolution of the solar ionizing flux, Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets, 102, 1641, 10.1029/96JE03306

    doi:10.1029/96je03306 1997

  7. [7]

    N., Daylan, T., et al

    Badenas-Agusti, M., Günther, M. N., Daylan, T., et al. 2020, title HD 191939: Three Sub-Neptunes Transiting a Sun-like Star Only 54 pc Away, The Astronomical Journal, 160, 113, 10.3847/1538-3881/aba0b5

    doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aba0b5 2020

  8. [8]

    D., Bassett, N., Burns, J

    Bale, S. D., Bassett, N., Burns, J. O., et al. 2023, LuSEE 'Night': The Lunar Surface Electromagnetics Experiment, Tech. rep. http://arxiv.org/abs/2301.10345

    arXiv 2023

Show all 161 references
  1. [9]

    S., Dulk, G

    Bastian, T. S., Dulk, G. A., & Leblanc, Y. 2000, title A Search for Radio Emission From Extrasolar Planets, The Astrophysical Journal, 545, 1058

    2000

  2. [10]

    J., Albrecht, S., et al

    Brogi, M., de Kok, R. J., Albrecht, S., et al. 2016, title Rotation and Winds of Exoplanet HD 189733 b Measured With High-Dispersion Transmission Spectroscopy, The Astrophysical Journal, 817, 106, 10.3847/0004-637x/817/2/106

    2016 doi

  3. [11]

    F., & Franklin, K

    Burke, B. F., & Franklin, K. L. 1955, title Observations of a Variable Radio Source Associated with the Planet Jupiter, Journal of Geophysical Research, 6, 213, https://doi.org/10.1029/JZ060i002p00213

    1955 doi

  4. [12]

    Busse, F. H. 1976, title Generation of Planetary Magnetism by Convection, Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 12, 350

    1976

  5. [13]

    Butler, B. J. 2005, title Long Wavelength Observations of Extrasolar Planets, in From Clark Lake to the Long Wavelength Array: Bill Erickson's Radio Science, ed. N. Kassim, M. Perez, W. Junor, & P. Henning, Vol. 345, 495

    2005

  6. [14]

    A., Hazra, G., D'Angelo, C

    Carolan, S., Vidotto, A. A., Hazra, G., D'Angelo, C. V., & Kubyshkina, D. 2021, title The effects of magnetic fields on observational signatures of atmospheric escape in exoplanets: Double tail structures, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 508, 6001, 10.1093/m...

    2021 doi

  7. [15]

    D., & Gulkis, S

    Carr, T. D., & Gulkis, S. 1969, title The Magnetosphere of Jupiter, Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 7, 577, 10.1146/annurev.aa.07.090169.003045

    1969

  8. [16]

    W., Shkolnik, E

    Cauley, P. W., Shkolnik, E. L., Llama, J., & Lanza, A. F. 2019, title Magnetic field strengths of hot Jupiters from signals of star–planet interactions, Nature Astronomy, 3, 1128, 10.1038/s41550-019-0840-x

    2019 doi

  9. [17]

    2004, title A Review of the Current Status of Follow-Up Techniques to Study Known Extrasolar Planets, in Stars as Suns : Activity, Evolution and Planets, ed

    Charbonneau, D. 2004, title A Review of the Current Status of Follow-Up Techniques to Study Known Extrasolar Planets, in Stars as Suns : Activity, Evolution and Planets, ed. A. K. Dupree & A. O. Benz, Vol. 219, 367, 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0312252

    2004 doi arXiv

  10. [18]

    2023, title The evolution of hot Jupiters revealed by the age distribution of their host stars, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 120, 10.1073/pnas

    Chen, D.-C., Xie, J.-W., Zhou, J.-L., et al. 2023, title The evolution of hot Jupiters revealed by the age distribution of their host stars, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 120, 10.1073/pnas

    2023 doi

  11. [19]

    Chen, H., & Rogers, L. A. 2016, title Evolutionary Analysis of Gaseous Sub-Neptune-Mass Planets With Mesa, The Astrophysical Journal, 831, 180, 10.3847/0004-637x/831/2/180

    2016 doi

  12. [20]

    2024, title Role of Planetary Radius on Atmospheric Escape of Rocky Exoplanets, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 963, L20, 10.3847/2041-8213/ad27d8

    Chin, L., Dong, C., & Lingam, M. 2024, title Role of Planetary Radius on Atmospheric Escape of Rocky Exoplanets, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 963, L20, 10.3847/2041-8213/ad27d8

    2024 doi

  13. [21]

    E., Kotsiaros, S., Oliversen, R

    Connerney, J. E., Kotsiaros, S., Oliversen, R. J., et al. 2018, title A New Model of Jupiter's Magnetic Field From Juno's First Nine Orbits, Geophysical Research Letters, 45, 2590, 10.1002/2018GL077312

    2018 doi

  14. [22]

    H., & Musielak, Z

    Cuntz, M., Saar, S. H., & Musielak, Z. E. 2000, title On Stellar Activity Enhancement Due to Interactions With Extrasolar Giant Planets, The Astrophysical Journal, 533, 151

    2000

  15. [23]

    A., & Ness, N

    Curtis, S. A., & Ness, N. F. 1986, title Magnetostrophic balance in planetary dynamos: Predictions for Neptune's magnetosphere, Journal of Geophysical Research, 91, 11003, 10.1029/ja091ia10p11003

    1986 doi

  16. [24]

    Daley-Yates, S., & Stevens, I. R. 2018, title Inhibition of the electron cyclotron maser instability in the dense magnetosphere of a hot jupiter, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 479, 1194, 10.1093/mnras/sty1652

    2018 doi

  17. [25]

    Dartnell, L. R. 2011, title Ionizing radiation and life, Astrobiology, 11, 551, 10.1089/ast.2010.0528

    2011

  18. [26]

    J., Petigura, E

    David, T. J., Petigura, E. A., Luger, R., et al. 2019, title Four Newborn Planets Transiting the Young Solar Analog V1298 Tau, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 885, L12, 10.3847/2041-8213/ab4c99

    2019 doi

  19. [27]

    N., Mikal-Evans, T., et al

    Daylan, T., Günther, M. N., Mikal-Evans, T., et al. 2021, title TESS Observations of the WASP-121 b Phase Curve, The Astronomical Journal, 161, 131, 10.3847/1538-3881/abd8d2

    2021 doi

  20. [28]

    D., & Kaiser, M

    Desch, M. D., & Kaiser, M. L. 1984, title Predictions for Uranus from a radiometric Bode's law, Nature, 310, 755

    1984

  21. [29]

    J., & Knapp, M

    de Gasperin, F., Lazio, T. J., & Knapp, M. 2020, title Radio observations of HD 80606 near planetary periastron: II. LOFAR low band antenna observations at 30-78 MHz, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 644, 10.1051/0004-6361/202038746

    2020 doi

  22. [30]

    E., Hall, P

    Dewdney, P. E., Hall, P. J., Schilizzi, R. T., & Lazio, T. J. L. 2009, title The square kilometre array, Proceedings of the IEEE, 97, 1482, 10.1109/JPROC.2009.2021005

    2009

  23. [31]

    2019, title Planetary magnetic field control of ion escape from weakly magnetized planets, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 488, 2108, 10.1093/mnras/stz1819

    Egan, H., Jarvinen, R., Ma, Y., & Brain, D. 2019, title Planetary magnetic field control of ion escape from weakly magnetized planets, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 488, 2108, 10.1093/mnras/stz1819

    2019 doi

  24. [32]

    M., Desch, M

    Farrell, W. M., Desch, M. D., Lazio, T. J., Bastian, T., & Zarka, P. 2003, title Limits on the Magnetosphere/Stellar Wind Interactions for the Extrasolar Planet about Tau Bootes, in Scientific Frontiers in Research on Extrasolar Planets ASP Conference Series, Vol. 294

    2003

  25. [33]

    M., Desch, M

    Farrell, W. M., Desch, M. D., & Zarka, P. 1999, title On the possibility of coherent cyclotron emission from extrasolar planets, Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets, 104, 14025, 10.1029/1998JE900050

    1999 doi

  26. [34]

    M., Lazio, T

    Farrell, W. M., Lazio, T. J. W., Desch, M. D., Bastian, T. S., & Zarka, P. 2004, title Radio Emission from Extrasolar Planets, in Bioastronomy 2002: Life Among the Stars, ed. R. Norris & F. Stootman, Vol. 213, 73

    2004

  27. [35]

    P., Vogt, S

    Feng, F., Butler, R. P., Vogt, S. S., et al. 2022, title 3D Selection of 167 Substellar Companions to Nearby Stars, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 262, 21, 10.3847/1538-4365/ac7e57

    2022 doi

  28. [36]

    P., Petit, P., Bouvier, J., et al

    Folsom, C. P., Petit, P., Bouvier, J., et al. 2016, title The evolution of surface magnetic fields in young solar-type stars - I. The first 250 Myr, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 457, 580, 10.1093/mnras/stv2924

    2016 doi

  29. [37]

    J., Petigura, E

    Fulton, B. J., Petigura, E. A., Howard, A. W., et al. 2017, title The California-Kepler Survey. III. A Gap in the Radius Distribution of Small Planets*, The Astronomical Journal, 154, 109, 10.3847/1538-3881/aa80eb

    2017 doi

  30. [38]

    Gagné, J., Fontaine, G., Simon, A., & Faherty, J. K. 2018, title A Young Ultramassive White Dwarf in the AB Doradus Moving Group, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 861, L13, 10.3847/2041-8213/aacdff

    2018 doi

  31. [40]

    D., Hedges, C., et al

    Giacalone, S., Dressing, C. D., Hedges, C., et al. 2022, title Validation of 13 Hot and Potentially Terrestrial TESS Planets, The Astronomical Journal, 163, 99, 10.3847/1538-3881/ac4334

    2022 doi

  32. [41]

    E., & Sari, R

    Ginzburg, S., Schlichting, H. E., & Sari, R. 2018, title Core-powered mass-loss and the radius distribution of small exoplanets, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 476, 759, 10.1093/mnras/sty290

    2018 doi

  33. [42]

    A., & Madhusudhan, N

    Green, D. A., & Madhusudhan, N. 2021, title Search for radio emission from the exoplanets Qatar-1b and WASP-80b near 150 MHz using the giant metrewave radio telescope, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 500, 211, 10.1093/mnras/staa3208

    2021 doi

  34. [43]

    Green, J., Boardsen, S., & Dong, C. 2021, title Magnetospheres of Terrestrial Exoplanets and Exomoons: Implications for Habitability and Detection, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 907, L45, 10.3847/2041-8213/abd93a

    2021 doi

  35. [44]

    2015, Detection Methods and Relevance of Exoplanetary Magnetic Fields (Springer International Publishing), 213--237, 10.1007/978-3-319-09749-7__11

    Grießmeier, J.-M. 2015, Detection Methods and Relevance of Exoplanetary Magnetic Fields (Springer International Publishing), 213--237, 10.1007/978-3-319-09749-7__11

    2015 doi

  36. [45]

    2009, title Stellar activity and magnetic shielding, Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union, 5, 385, 10.1017/s1743921309992961

    Grießmeier, J.-M., Khodachenko, M., Lammer, H., et al. 2009, title Stellar activity and magnetic shielding, Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union, 5, 385, 10.1017/s1743921309992961

    2009 doi

  37. [46]

    M., Motschmann, U., Glassmeier, K

    Grießmeier, J. M., Motschmann, U., Glassmeier, K. H., Mann, G., & Rucker, H. O. 2006, title The potential of exoplanetary radio emissions as an observation method, in Tenth Anniversary of 51 Peg-b: Status of and prospects for hot Jupiter studies, 259--266

    2006

  38. [47]

    M., Motschmann, U., Mann, G., & Rucker, H

    Grießmeier, J. M., Motschmann, U., Mann, G., & Rucker, H. O. 2005, title The influence of stellar wind conditions on the detectability of planetary radio emissions, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 437, 717, 10.1051/0004-6361:20041976

    2005 doi

  39. [48]

    M., Preusse, S., Khodachenko, M., et al

    Grießmeier, J. M., Preusse, S., Khodachenko, M., et al. 2007 a , title Exoplanetary radio emission under different stellar wind conditions, Planetary and Space Science, 55, 618, 10.1016/j.pss.2006.01.008

    2007 doi

  40. [49]

    M., Stadelmann, A., Grenfell, J

    Grießmeier, J. M., Stadelmann, A., Grenfell, J. L., Lammer, H., & Motschmann, U. 2009, title On the protection of extrasolar Earth-like planets around K/M stars against galactic cosmic rays, Icarus, 199, 526, 10.1016/j.icarus.2008.09.015

    2009 doi

  41. [50]

    2005, title Cosmic Ray Impact on Extrasolar Earth-Like Planets in Close-in Habitable Zones, Astrobiology, 5

    Grießmeier, J.-M., Stadelmann, A., Motschmann, U., et al. 2005, title Cosmic Ray Impact on Extrasolar Earth-Like Planets in Close-in Habitable Zones, Astrobiology, 5. www.liebertpub.com

    2005

  42. [51]

    M., Tabataba-Vakili, F., Stadelmann, A., Grenfell, J

    Grießmeier, J. M., Tabataba-Vakili, F., Stadelmann, A., Grenfell, J. L., & Atri, D. 2015, title Galactic cosmic rays on extrasolar Earth-like planets: I. Cosmic ray flux, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 581, 10.1051/0004-6361/201425451

    2015 doi

  43. [52]

    M., Zarka, P., & Spreeuw, H

    Grießmeier, J. M., Zarka, P., & Spreeuw, H. 2007 b , title Predicting low-frequency radio fluxes of known extrasolar planets, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 475, 359, 10.1051/0004-6361:20077397

    2007 doi

  44. [53]

    Hot Jupiters

    Grießmeier, J. M., Stadelmann, A., Penz, T., et al. 2004, title The effect of tidal locking on the magnetospheric and atmospheric evolution of "Hot Jupiters", Astronomy and Astrophysics, 425, 753, 10.1051/0004-6361:20035684

    2004 doi

  45. [54]

    2020, title Atmospheric Escape Processes and Planetary Atmospheric Evolution, Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 125, 10.1029/2019JA027639

    Gronoff, G., Arras, P., Baraka, S., et al. 2020, title Atmospheric Escape Processes and Planetary Atmospheric Evolution, Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 125, 10.1029/2019JA027639

    2020 doi

  46. [55]

    M., Seager, S., Huang, C

    Guerrero, N. M., Seager, S., Huang, C. X., et al. 2021, title The TESS Objects of Interest Catalog from the TESS Prime Mission, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 254, 39, 10.3847/1538-4365/abefe1

    2021 doi

  47. [56]

    2018, title Why an intrinsic magnetic field does not protect a planet against atmospheric escape, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 614, 10.1051/0004-6361/201832934

    Gunell, H., Maggiolo, R., Nilsson, H., et al. 2018, title Why an intrinsic magnetic field does not protect a planet against atmospheric escape, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 614, 10.1051/0004-6361/201832934

    2018 doi

  48. [57]

    Gupta, A., & Schlichting, H. E. 2019, title Sculpting the valley in the radius distribution of small exoplanets as a by-product of planet formation: The core-powered mass-loss mechanism, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 487, 24, 10.1093/mnras/stz1230

    2019 doi

  49. [58]

    S., et al

    Gupta, Y., Ajithkumar, B., Kale, H. S., et al. 2017, title The upgraded GMRT: Opening new windows on the radio Universe, Current Science, 113, 707, 10.18520/cs/v113/i04/707-714

    2017 doi

  50. [59]

    Gurnett, D. A. 1974, title The Earth as a radio source: Terrestrial kilometric radiation, Journal of Geophysical Research, 79, 4227, 10.1029/ja079i028p04227

    1974 doi

  51. [60]

    N., Pozuelos, F

    Günther, M. N., Pozuelos, F. J., Dittmann, J. A., et al. 2019, title A super-Earth and two sub-Neptunes transiting the nearby and quiet M dwarf TOI-270, Nature Astronomy, 3, 1099, 10.1038/s41550-019-0845-5

    2019 doi

  52. [61]

    K., Antonova, A., et al

    Hallinan, G., Sirothia, S. K., Antonova, A., et al. 2013, title Looking for a pulse: A search for rotationally modulated radio emission from the hot Jupiter, τ BOÖTIS b, The Astrophysical Journal, 762, 10.1088/0004-637X/762/1/34

    2013 doi

  53. [62]

    L., & Zarka, P

    Hess, S. L., & Zarka, P. 2011, title Modeling the radio signature of the orbital parameters, rotation, and magnetic field of exoplanets, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 531, 10.1051/0004-6361/201116510

    2011 doi

  54. [63]

    2014, title Planetary population synthesis coupled with atmospheric escape: A statistical view of evaporation, Astrophysical Journal, 795, 10.1088/0004-637X/795/1/65

    Jin, S., Mordasini, C., Parmentier, V., et al. 2014, title Planetary population synthesis coupled with atmospheric escape: A statistical view of evaporation, Astrophysical Journal, 795, 10.1088/0004-637X/795/1/65

    2014 doi

  55. [64]

    P., Güdel, M., Lüftinger, T., Toth, G., & Brott, I

    Johnstone, C. P., Güdel, M., Lüftinger, T., Toth, G., & Brott, I. 2015, title Stellar winds on the main-sequence: I. Wind model, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 577, 10.1051/0004-6361/201425300

    2015 doi

  56. [65]

    1980, title Voyager Detection of Nonthermal Radio Emission from Saturn, Science, 209, 1238

    Kaiser, M., Desch, M., Warwick, J., & Pearce, J. 1980, title Voyager Detection of Nonthermal Radio Emission from Saturn, Science, 209, 1238. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1684520

    1980

  57. [66]

    D., & Vedantham, H

    Kavanagh, R. D., & Vedantham, H. K. 2023, title Hunting for exoplanets via magnetic star-planet interactions: Geometrical considerations for radio emission, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 524, 6267, 10.1093/mnras/stad2035

    2023 doi

  58. [67]

    D., & Vidotto, A

    Kavanagh, R. D., & Vidotto, A. A. 2020, title Radio eclipses of exoplanets by the winds of their host stars, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 493, 1492, 10.1093/mnras/staa422

    2020 doi

  59. [68]

    2016, title Probability of Cme Impact on Exoplanets Orbiting M Dwarfs and Solar-Like Stars, The Astrophysical Journal, 826, 195, 10.3847/0004-637x/826/2/195

    Kay, C., Opher, M., & Kornbleuth, M. 2016, title Probability of Cme Impact on Exoplanets Orbiting M Dwarfs and Solar-Like Stars, The Astrophysical Journal, 826, 195, 10.3847/0004-637x/826/2/195

    2016 doi

  60. [69]

    2025, Aegis, v1.0 Zenodo, 10.5281/zenodo.15351569

    Kaya, A., & Daylan, T. 2025, Aegis, v1.0 Zenodo, 10.5281/zenodo.15351569

    2025 doi

  61. [70]

    L., Shaikhislamov, I

    Khodachenko, M. L., Shaikhislamov, I. F., Lammer, H., & Prokopov, P. A. 2015, title Atmosphere Expansion and Mass Loss of Close-Orbit Giant Exoplanets Heated by Stellar XUV. II. Effects of Planetary Magnetic Field; Structuring of Inner Magnetosphere, Astrophysical Journal, 813...

    2015 doi

  62. [71]

    L., Ribas, I., Lammer, H., et al

    Khodachenko, M. L., Ribas, I., Lammer, H., et al. 2007, title Coronal Mass Ejection (CME) activity of low mass M stars as an important factor for the habitability of terrestrial exoplanets. I. CME impact on expected magnetospheres of Earth-like exoplanets in close-in habitable...

    2007

  63. [72]

    Knapp, M., Paritsky, L., Kononov, E., & Kao, M. M. 2024, Great Observatory for Long Wavelengths (GO-LoW) NIAC Phase I Final Report, Tech. rep. http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.08432

    2024 arXiv

  64. [73]

    I., Kulikov, Y

    Lammer, H., Lichtenegger, H. I., Kulikov, Y. N., et al. 2007, title Coronal Mass Ejection (CME) activity of low mass M stars as an important factor for the habitability of terrestrial exoplanets. II. CME-induced ion pick up of Earth-like exoplanets in close-in habitable zones,...

    2007

  65. [74]

    H., Coustenis, A., et al

    Lammer, H., Bredehöft, J. H., Coustenis, A., et al. 2009, title What makes a planet habitable? Astronomy and Astrophysics Review, 17, 181, 10.1007/s00159-009-0019-z

    2009 doi

  66. [75]

    2009, title Magnetospheric Emissions from Extrasolar Planets, in astro2010: The Astronomy and Astrophysics Decadal Survey, Vol

    Lazio, J., Bastian, T., Bryden, G., et al. 2009, title Magnetospheric Emissions from Extrasolar Planets, in astro2010: The Astronomy and Astrophysics Decadal Survey, Vol. 2010, 177, 10.48550/arXiv.0903.0873

    2009 doi arXiv

  67. [76]

    Lazio, T. J. W. 2018, Radio Observations as an Exoplanet Discovery Method (Springer International Publishing), 817--833, 10.1007/978-3-319-55333-7_9

    2018 doi

  68. [77]

    Lazio, T. J. W., & Farrell, W. M. 2007, title Magnetospheric Emissions From the Planet Orbiting tau Bootis: A Multiepoch Search, The Astrophysical Journal, 668, 1182

    2007

  69. [78]

    M., et al

    Lazio, W., Joseph, T., Farrell, W. M., et al. 2004, title The Radiometric Bode’s Law and Extrasolar Planets, The Astrophysical Journal, 612, 511

    2004

  70. [79]

    K., Gopal-Krishna, & Zarka, P

    Lecavelier Des Etangs, A., Sirothia, S. K., Gopal-Krishna, & Zarka, P. 2013, title Hint of 150 MHz radio emission from the Neptune-mass extrasolar transiting planet HAT-P-11b, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 552, 10.1051/0004-6361/201219789

    2013 doi

  71. [80]

    J., & Chiang, E

    Lee, E. J., & Chiang, E. 2016, title Breeding Super-Earths and Birthing Super-Puffs in Transitional Disks, The Astrophysical Journal, 817, 90, 10.3847/0004-637x/817/2/90

    2016 doi

  72. [81]

    J., Chiang, E., & Ormel, C

    Lee, E. J., Chiang, E., & Ormel, C. W. 2014, title Make super-earths, not jupiters: Accreting nebular gas onto solid cores at 0.1 AU and beyond, Astrophysical Journal, 797, 10.1088/0004-637X/797/2/95

    2014 doi

  73. [82]

    R., Kaplan, D

    Lenc, E., Murphy, T., Lynch, C. R., Kaplan, D. L., & Zhang, S. N. 2018, title An all-sky survey of circular polarization at 200 MHz, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 478, 2835, 10.1093/mnras/sty1304

    2018 doi

  74. [83]

    S., Barry, N., et al

    Lenc, E., Anderson, C. S., Barry, N., et al. 2017, title The challenges of low-frequency radio polarimetry: Lessons from the Murchison widefield array, Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia, 34, 10.1017/pasa.2017.36

    2017 doi

  75. [84]

    2023, title Statistical and Radio Analysis of Exoplanets and Their Host Stars, Universe, 9, 10.3390/universe9110475

    Li, B., Zhang, L., Su, T., et al. 2023, title Statistical and Radio Analysis of Exoplanets and Their Host Stars, Universe, 9, 10.3390/universe9110475

    2023 doi

  76. [85]

    Llama, J., Wood, K., Jardine, M., et al. 2011, title The shocking transit of WASP-12b: Modelling the observed early ingress in the near-ultraviolet, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters, 416, 10.1111/j.1745-3933.2011.01093.x

    2011

  77. [86]

    C., Johnson, J

    Lockwood, A. C., Johnson, J. A., Bender, C. F., et al. 2014, title NEAR-IR direct detection of water vapor in tau Boötis b, Astrophysical Journal Letters, 783, 10.1088/2041-8205/783/2/L29

    2014 doi

  78. [87]

    D., & Fortney, J

    Lopez, E. D., & Fortney, J. J. 2013, title The role of core mass in controlling evaporation: The kepler radius distribution and the kepler-36 density dichotomy, Astrophysical Journal, 776, 10.1088/0004-637X/776/1/2

    2013 doi

  79. [88]

    D., & Fortney, J

    Lopez, E. D., & Fortney, J. J. 2014, Understanding the mass-radius relation for sub-neptunes: Radius as a proxy for composition, Institute of Physics Publishing, 10.1088/0004-637X/792/1/1

    2014 doi

  80. [89]

    S., Kjeldsen, H., Albrecht, S., et al

    Lundkvist, M. S., Kjeldsen, H., Albrecht, S., et al. 2016, title Hot super-Earths stripped by their host stars, Nature Communications, 7, 10.1038/ncomms11201

    2016 doi

  81. [90]

    2023, title Quantifying the Key Factors Affecting the Escape of Planetary Atmospheres, The Astrophysical Journal, 951, 136, 10.3847/1538-4357/acd330

    Luo, J., He, H.-Q., Tong, G.-S., & Li, J. 2023, title Quantifying the Key Factors Affecting the Escape of Planetary Atmospheres, The Astrophysical Journal, 951, 136, 10.3847/1538-4357/acd330

    2023 doi

  82. [91]

    R., Murphy, T., Kaplan, D

    Lynch, C. R., Murphy, T., Kaplan, D. L., Ireland, M., & Bell, M. E. 2017, title A search for circularly polarized emission from young exoplanets, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 467, 3447, 10.1093/mnras/stx354

    2017 doi

  83. [92]

    R., Murphy, T., Lenc, E., & Kaplan, D

    Lynch, C. R., Murphy, T., Lenc, E., & Kaplan, D. L. 2018, title The detectability of radio emission from exoplanets, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 478, 1763, 10.1093/mnras/sty1138

    2018 doi

  84. [93]

    M., Zarka, P., & Turner, J

    Mauduit, E., Griessmeier, J. M., Zarka, P., & Turner, J. D. 2023, title PALANTIR: an updated prediction tool for exoplanetary radio emissions, in Planetary, Solar and Heliospheric Radio Emissions IX, ed. C. K. Louis, C. M. Jackman, G. Fischer, A. H. Sulaiman, & P. Zucca, 485--...

    2023 doi

  85. [94]

    D., & Beard, D

    Mead, G. D., & Beard, D. B. 1964, title Shape of the Geomagnetic Field Solar Wind Boundary, Journal of Geophysical Research, 69, 1169, 10.1029/JZ069i007p01169

    1964 doi

  86. [95]

    1992, title A New Scaling Law of the Planetary Magnetic Fields, Advances in Space Research, 12, 265

    Mizutani, H., Yamamoto, T., & Fujimura, A. 1992, title A New Scaling Law of the Planetary Magnetic Fields, Advances in Space Research, 12, 265

    1992

  87. [96]

    F., Petit, P., et al

    Morin, J., Donati, J. F., Petit, P., et al. 2008 a , title Large-scale magnetic topologies of mid M dwarfs, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 390, 567, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13809.x

    2008

  88. [97]

    F., Forveille, T., et al

    Morin, J., Donati, J. F., Forveille, T., et al. 2008 b , title The stable magnetic field of the fully convective star V374 Peg, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 384, 77, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12709.x

    2008

  89. [98]

    E., Kaplan, D

    Murphy, T., Bell, M. E., Kaplan, D. L., et al. 2015, title Limits on low-frequency radio emission from southern exoplanets with the murchison widefield array, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 446, 2560, 10.1093/mnras/stu2253

    2015 doi

  90. [99]

    Narang, M., Manoj, P., Chandra, C. H. I., et al. 2021, title In search of radio emission from exoplanets: GMRT observations of the binary system HD 41004, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 500, 4818, 10.1093/mnras/staa3565

    2021 doi

  91. [100]

    2025, Planetary Systems Composite Data,, https://exoplanetarchive.ipac.caltech.edu/ 10.26133/NEA13

    NASA Exoplanet Science Institute . 2025, Planetary Systems Composite Data,, https://exoplanetarchive.ipac.caltech.edu/ 10.26133/NEA13

    2025 doi

  92. [101]

    Newkirk, G. J. 1980, title Solar Variability on Timescales of 1e5 years to 1e9.6 Years, in The Ancient Sun: Fossil Record in the Earth, Moon and Meteorites., ed. R. O. Pepin, J. A. Eddy, & R. B. Merrill (Pergamon Press), 293--320

    1980

  93. [102]

    D., & Milan, S

    Nichols, J. D., & Milan, S. E. 2016, title Stellar wind-magnetosphere interaction at exoplanets: Computations of auroral radio powers, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 461, 10.1093/mnras/stw1430

    2016 doi

  94. [103]

    P., Vlemmings, W., et al

    O'Gorman, E., Coughlan, C. P., Vlemmings, W., et al. 2018, title A search for radio emission from exoplanets around evolved stars, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 612, 10.1051/0004-6361/201731965

    2018 doi

  95. [104]

    Owen, J. E. 2019, title Atmospheric Escape and the Evolution of Close-In Exoplanets, Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 47, 67, 10.1146/annurev-earth-053018

    2019 doi

  96. [105]

    E., & Adams, F

    Owen, J. E., & Adams, F. C. 2014, title Magnetically controlled mass-loss from extrasolar planets in close orbits, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 444, 3761, 10.1093/mnras/stu1684

    2014 doi

  97. [106]

    E., & Adams, F

    Owen, J. E., & Adams, F. C. 2019, title Effects of magnetic fields on the location of the evaporation valley for low-mass exoplanets, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 490, 15, 10.1093/mnras/stz2601

    2019 doi

  98. [107]

    E., & Lai, D

    Owen, J. E., & Lai, D. 2018, title Photoevaporation and high-eccentricity migration created the sub-Jovian desert, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 479, 5012, 10.1093/mnras/sty1760

    2018 doi

  99. [108]

    E., & Wu, Y

    Owen, J. E., & Wu, Y. 2013, title Kepler planets: A tale of evaporation, Astrophysical Journal, 775, 10.1088/0004-637X/775/2/105

    2013 doi

  100. [109]

    E., & Wu, Y

    Owen, J. E., & Wu, Y. 2017, title The Evaporation Valley in the Kepler Planets, The Astrophysical Journal, 847, 29, 10.3847/1538-4357/aa890a

    2017 doi

  101. [110]

    Parker, E. N. 1958, title Dynamics of the Interplanetary Gas and Magnetic Fields, The Astrophysical Journal, 128, 664

    1958

  102. [111]

    Reiners, A., & Christensen, U. R. 2010, title A magnetic field evolution scenario for brown dwarfs and giant planets, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 522, 10.1051/0004-6361/201014251

    2010 doi

  103. [112]

    R., Winn, J

    Ricker, G. R., Winn, J. N., Vanderspek, R., et al. 2015, title Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite, Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems, 1, 001403, 10.1117/1.jatis.1.1.014003

    2015 doi

  104. [113]

    1993, title The Magnetic Fields of the Planets: A New Scaling Law of the Dipole Moments of the Planetary Magnetism, J

    Sano, Y. 1993, title The Magnetic Fields of the Planets: A New Scaling Law of the Dipole Moments of the Planetary Magnetism, J. Geomag. Geoelectr, 45, 65

    1993

  105. [114]

    B., Beltz, H., Komacek, T

    Savel, A. B., Beltz, H., Komacek, T. D., Tsai, S.-M., & Kempton, E. M.-R. 2024, title A New Lever on Exoplanetary B Fields: Measuring Heavy Ion Velocities, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 969, L27, 10.3847/2041-8213/ad5a0a

    2024 doi

  106. [115]

    E., Spake, J

    Schreyer, E., Owen, J. E., Spake, J. J., Bahroloom, Z., & Giampasquale, S. D. 2024, title Using helium 10 830 Å transits to constrain planetary magnetic fields, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 527, 5117, 10.1093/mnras/stad3528

    2024 doi

  107. [116]

    Schwarz, H., Ginski, C., Kok, R. J. D., et al. 2016, title The slow spin of the young substellar companion GQ Lupi b and its orbital configuration, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 593, 10.1051/0004-6361/201628908

    2016 doi

  108. [117]

    1989, title Zeeman-Doppler imaging of active stars I

    Semel, M. 1989, title Zeeman-Doppler imaging of active stars I. Basic principles, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 225, 456

    1989

  109. [118]

    2022, title Unveiled by a High-Resolution Magnetic Field and Secular Variation Model, Geophysical Research Letters, 2022, 10, 10.1029/2022GL098839ï

    Sharan, S., Langlais, B., Amit, H., et al. 2022, title Unveiled by a High-Resolution Magnetic Field and Secular Variation Model, Geophysical Research Letters, 2022, 10, 10.1029/2022GL098839ï

    2022 doi

  110. [119]

    2024, title A search for auroral radio emission from β Pictoris b, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 528, 2136, 10.1093/mnras/stad3990

    Shiohira, Y., Fujii, Y., Kita, H., et al. 2024, title A search for auroral radio emission from β Pictoris b, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 528, 2136, 10.1093/mnras/stad3990

    2024 doi

  111. [120]

    A., Walker, G

    Shkolnik, E., Bohlender, D. A., Walker, G. A. H., & Cameron, A. C. 2008, title The On/Off Nature of Star-Planet Interactions 1, The Astrophysical Journal, 676, 628. http://www.obs-hp.fr/www/pubs/Coll51Peg

    2008

  112. [121]

    Shkolnik, E., Walker, G. A. H., & Bohlender, D. A. 2003, title Evidence for Planet-Induced Chromospheric Activity on HD 179949, The Astrophysical Journal, 597, 1092. http://www.obspm.fr/encycl/catalog.html

    2003

  113. [122]

    Shkolnik, E., Walker, G. A. H., Bohlender, D. A., Gu, P.-G., & Kürster, M. 2005, title Hot Jupiters and Hot Spots: The Short-and Long-Term Chromospheric Activity on Stars With Giant Planets 1, The Astrophysical Journal, 622, 1075

    2005

  114. [123]

    K., Etangs, A

    Sirothia, S. K., Etangs, A. L. D., Gopal-Krishna, G. K., Kantharia, N. G., & Ishwar-Chandra, C. H. 2014, title Search for 150 MHz radio emission from extrasolar planets in the TIFR GMRT Sky Survey, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 562, 10.1051/0004-6361/201321571

    2014 doi

  115. [124]

    M., Cameron, A

    Smith, A. M., Cameron, A. C., Greaves, J., et al. 2009, title Secondary radio eclipse of the transiting planet HD 189733 b: An upper limit at 307-347 MHz, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 395, 335, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.14510.x

    2009

  116. [125]

    A., Brandl, B

    Snellen, I. A., Brandl, B. R., Kok, R. J. D., et al. 2014, title Fast spin of the young extrasolar planet β Pictoris b, Nature, 508, 63, 10.1038/nature13253

    2014 doi

  117. [126]

    1983, title Planetary magnetic fields, Rep

    Stevenson, D. 1983, title Planetary magnetic fields, Rep. Prog. Phys, 46, 555

    1983

  118. [127]

    A., & Röttgering, H

    Stroe, A., Snellen, I. A., & Röttgering, H. J. 2012, title A stringent upper limit to 18 cm radio emission from the extrasolar planet system τ Boötis, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 546, 10.1051/0004-6361/201220006

    2012 doi

  119. [128]

    M., & Kiss, L

    Szabó, G. M., & Kiss, L. L. 2011, title A short-period censor of sub-Jupiter mass exoplanets with low density, Astrophysical Journal Letters, 727, 10.1088/2041-8205/727/2/L44

    2011 doi

  120. [129]

    2004, title The Magnetic Field in Giant Extrasolar Planets, The Astrophysical Journal, 609, 87, 10.1086/422840

    Sánchez-Lavega, A. 2004, title The Magnetic Field in Giant Extrasolar Planets, The Astrophysical Journal, 609, 87, 10.1086/422840

    2004 doi

  121. [130]

    B., Arras, P., & Li, Z

    Trammell, G. B., Arras, P., & Li, Z. Y. 2011, title Hot Jupiter magnetospheres, Astrophysical Journal, 728, 10.1088/0004-637X/728/2/152

    2011 doi

  122. [131]

    B., Li, Z

    Trammell, G. B., Li, Z. Y., & Arras, P. 2014, title Magnetohydrodynamic simulations of hot jupiter upper atmospheres, Astrophysical Journal, 788, 10.1088/0004-637X/788/2/161

    2014 doi

  123. [132]

    Treumann, R. A. 2006, title The electron-cyclotron maser for astrophysical application, Astronomy and Astrophysics Review, 13, 229, 10.1007/s00159-006-0001-y

    2006 doi

  124. [133]

    D., Grießmeier, J

    Turner, J. D., Grießmeier, J. M., Zarka, P., Zhang, X., & Mauduit, E. 2024, title Follow-up LOFAR observations of the ττ Boötis exoplanetary system, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 688, 10.1051/0004-6361/202450095

    2024 doi

  125. [134]

    D., Zarka, P., Grießmeier, J

    Turner, J. D., Zarka, P., Grießmeier, J. M., et al. 2021, title The search for radio emission from the exoplanetary systems 55 Cancri, υ Andromedae, and τ Boötis using LOFAR beam-formed observations, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 645, 10.1051/0004-6361/201937201

    2021 doi

  126. [135]

    D., Zarka, P., Griessmeier, J.-M., et al

    Turner, J. D., Zarka, P., Griessmeier, J.-M., et al. 2023, title Follow-up radio observations of the Bo\"\ o\ tis exoplanetary system: Preliminary results from NenuFAR, 10.25546/104048

    2023 doi

  127. [136]

    D., Wynn, G

    Turnpenney, S., Nichols, J. D., Wynn, G. A., & Burleigh, M. R. 2018, title Exoplanet-induced Radio Emission from M Dwarfs, The Astrophysical Journal, 854, 72, 10.3847/1538-4357/aaa59c

    2018 doi

  128. [137]

    S., et al

    van Eylen, V., Agentoft, C., Lundkvist, M. S., et al. 2018, title An asteroseismic view of the radius valley: Stripped cores, not born rocky, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 479, 4786, 10.1093/mnras/sty1783

    2018 doi

  129. [138]

    P., Wise, M

    van Haarlem, M. P., Wise, M. W., Gunst, A. W., et al. 2013, title LOFAR: The low-frequency array, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 556, 10.1051/0004-6361/201220873

    2013 doi

  130. [139]

    M., Haldemann, J., Ronco, M

    Venturini, J., Guilera, O. M., Haldemann, J., Ronco, M. P., & Mordasini, C. 2020, title The nature of the radius valley: Hints from formation and evolution models, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 643, 10.1051/0004-6361/202039141

    2020 doi

  131. [140]

    A., Feeney, N., & Groh, J

    Vidotto, A. A., Feeney, N., & Groh, J. H. 2019, title Can we detect aurora in exoplanets orbiting M dwarfs? Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 633, 10.1093/mnras/stz1696

    2019 doi

  132. [141]

    A., Jardine, M., & Helling, C

    Vidotto, A. A., Jardine, M., & Helling, C. 2010, title Early UV ingress in WASP-12b: Measuring planetary magnetic fields, Astrophysical Journal Letters, 722, 10.1088/2041-8205/722/2/L168

    2010 doi

  133. [142]

    A., Jardine, M., & Helling, C

    Vidotto, A. A., Jardine, M., & Helling, C. 2011, title Transit variability in bow shock-hosting planets, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 414, 1573, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18491.x

    2011

  134. [143]

    A., Gregory, S

    Vidotto, A. A., Gregory, S. G., Jardine, M., et al. 2014, title Stellar magnetism: Empirical trends with age and rotation, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 441, 2361, 10.1093/mnras/stu728

    2014 doi

  135. [144]

    J., Ruffio, J.-B., Morris, E., et al

    Wang, J. J., Ruffio, J.-B., Morris, E., et al. 2021, title Detection and Bulk Properties of the HR 8799 Planets with High-resolution Spectroscopy, The Astronomical Journal, 162, 148, 10.3847/1538-3881/ac1349

    2021 doi

  136. [145]

    V., Ivanov, V

    Weber, C., Erkaev, N. V., Ivanov, V. A., et al. 2018, title Supermassive hot Jupiters provide more favourable conditions for the generation of radio emission via the cyclotron maser instability - a case study based on Tau Bootis b, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Soc...

    2018 doi

  137. [146]

    F., et al

    Weber, C., Lammer, H., Shaikhislamov, I. F., et al. 2017, title How expanded ionospheres of Hot Jupiters can prevent escape of radio emission generated by the cyclotron maser instability, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 469, 3505, 10.1093/mnras/stx1099

    2017 doi

  138. [147]

    M., Dulk, G

    Winglee, R. M., Dulk, G. A., & Bastian, T. S. 1986, title A Search for Cyclotron Maser Radiation From Substellar and Planet-Like Companions of Nearby Stars, The Astrophysical Journal, 59, 59, 10.1086/184760

    1986 doi

  139. [148]

    E., Mü, H.-R., Zank, G

    Wood, B. E., Mü, H.-R., Zank, G. P., & Linsky, J. L. 2002, title Measured Mass-Loss Rates of Solar-Like Stars as a Function of Age and Activity, The Astrophysical Journal, 574, 412, 10.1086/340797

    2002 doi

  140. [149]

    E., Mü, H.-R., Zank, G

    Wood, B. E., Mü, H.-R., Zank, G. P., Linsky, J. L., & Redfield, S. 2005, title New Mass-Loss Measurements from Astrospheric Lyα Absorption, The Astrophysical Journal, 628, 143, 10.1086/432716

    2005 doi

  141. [150]

    Wu, C. S. 1985, title Kinetic Cyclotron and Synchrotron Maser Instabilities: Radio Emission Processes by Direct Amplification of Radiation, Space Science Reviews, 41, 215, 10.1007/BF00190653

    1985 doi

  142. [151]

    S., & Lee, L

    Wu, C. S., & Lee, L. C. 1979, title A Theory of the Terrestrial Kilometric Radiation, The Astrophysical Journal, 230, 621

    1979

  143. [152]

    W., Bryan, M

    Xuan, J. W., Bryan, M. L., Knutson, H. A., et al. 2020, title A Rotation Rate for the Planetary-mass Companion DH Tau b, The Astronomical Journal, 159, 97, 10.3847/1538-3881/ab67c4

    2020 doi

  144. [153]

    Yantis, W. F., W. T., I. S., & Erickson, W. C. 1977, title A Search for Extra-Solar Jovian Planets by Radio Techniques, Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society, 9, 453

    1977

  145. [154]

    1992, title The Auroral Radio Emissions From Planetary Magnetospheres: What Do We Know, What Don’t We Know, What Do We Learn From Them? Adv

    Zarka, P. 1992, title The Auroral Radio Emissions From Planetary Magnetospheres: What Do We Know, What Don’t We Know, What Do We Learn From Them? Adv. Space Res, 12, 99

    1992

  146. [155]

    2004, title Fast radio imaging of Jupiter's magnetosphere at low-frequencies with LOFAR, Planetary and Space Science, 52, 1455, 10.1016/j.pss.2004.09.017

    Zarka, P. 2004, title Fast radio imaging of Jupiter's magnetosphere at low-frequencies with LOFAR, Planetary and Space Science, 52, 1455, 10.1016/j.pss.2004.09.017

    2004 doi

  147. [156]

    2018, Star-planet interactions in the radio domain: Prospect for their detection (Springer International Publishing), 1775--1790, 10.1007/978-3-319-55333-7_22

    Zarka, P. 2018, Star-planet interactions in the radio domain: Prospect for their detection (Springer International Publishing), 1775--1790, 10.1007/978-3-319-55333-7_22

    2018 doi

  148. [157]

    Zarka, P., Cecconi, B., & Kurth, W. S. 2004, title Jupiter's low-frequency radio spectrum from Cassini/Radio and Plasma Wave Science (RPWS) absolute flux density measurements, Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 109, 10.1029/2003JA010260

    2004 doi

  149. [158]

    2015 a , title Magnetospheric Radio Emissions from Exoplanets with the SKA, in Advancing Astrophysics with the Square Kilometre Array, 10.22323/1.215.0120

    Zarka, P., Joseph, T., Lazio, W., et al. 2015 a , title Magnetospheric Radio Emissions from Exoplanets with the SKA, in Advancing Astrophysics with the Square Kilometre Array, 10.22323/1.215.0120

    2015 doi

  150. [159]

    M., et al

    Zarka, P., Li, D., Grießmeier, J. M., et al. 2019, title Detecting exoplanets with FAST? Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 19, 10.1088/1674-4527/19/2/23

    2019 doi

  151. [160]

    2015 b , title NenUFAR: Instrument Description and Science Case, in 2015 International Conference on Antenna Theory and Techniques (ICATT), 10.1109/ICATT.2015.7136773

    Zarka, P., Tagger, M., Girard, J., & et al. 2015 b , title NenUFAR: Instrument Description and Science Case, in 2015 International Conference on Antenna Theory and Techniques (ICATT), 10.1109/ICATT.2015.7136773

    2015

  152. [161]

    A., Ryabov, B

    Zarka, P., Treumann, R. A., Ryabov, B. P., & Ryabov, V. B. 2001, title Magnetically-Driven Planetary Radio Emissions and Application to Extrasolar Planets, Astrophysics and Space Science, 277, 293, 10.1023/A:1012221527425

    2001 doi

  153. [162]

    P., et al

    Zarka, P., Queinnec, J., Ryabov, B. P., et al. 1997, title Ground-Based High Sensitivity Radio Astronomy at Decameter Wavelengths, in Planetary Radio Emissions IV, 101--128

    1997

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.