Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Analysis of the Fokker-Planck Equation in Schwarzschild Spacetime: A Supersymmetric Connection

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The Fokker-Planck equation for a Schwarzschild black hole reduces to a harmonic oscillator, and supersymmetric isospectral deformation yields a one-parameter family of potentials with the same energies but different wavefunctions.

desk verdict The central new potential in Eq. (21) does not follow from the paper's own Bernoulli condition; the claimed isospectral family collapses to the original oscillator, leaving no new result beyond the known Xu and Mielnik results. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.04643 v1 pith:JDYQZOLN submitted 2025-06-05 hep-th quant-ph

Ojaswini Sharma , Aradhya Shukla This is my paper
classification hep-thquant-ph MSC 81Q6035Q8483C57 PACS 04.70.-s03.65.-w05.40.-a
keywords Fokker-PlanckequationSchwarzschildblackholesupersymmetricquantummechanicsisospectraldeformationharmonicoscillatorthermalpotentialthermodynamicsstochasticprocessesincurvedspacetime
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that the Fokker-Planck equation describing thermal fluctuations of the Schwarzschild black hole reduces, after a rescaling, to the Schrödinger equation of a shifted harmonic oscillator with energy levels $E_n=2\pi T(n+1)$ set by the ensemble temperature. It then applies supersymmetric quantum mechanics to this oscillator: translating the superpotential $W(\zeta)=\zeta$ by an error-function term produces a one-parameter family of deformed potentials $\tilde V_+(\zeta;\lambda)$ that share the original energy spectrum exactly while having different, still normalizable wavefunctions. The point of the correspondence is that a gravitational thermal-diffusion problem carries the same supersymmetric structure as the quantum oscillator, so spectral data alone cannot distinguish the original and deformed thermal potentials. A sympathetic reader would care because the result links black-hole stochastic dynamics to exactly solvable quantum models and supplies a mechanism for reshaping local probability densities without changing the global spectrum.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing machinery is the isospectral deformation of a superpotential in supersymmetric quantum mechanics. Starting from the oscillator superpotential $W(\zeta)=\zeta$, a correction $f$ is added and required to satisfy the Bernoulli equation $f^2+2Wf+f'=0$; for $f(\zeta)=2e^{-\zeta^2}/(\sqrt{\pi}(\operatorname{erf}(\zeta)+\lambda))$ this yields the translated superpotential $\tilde W$ and the deformed potential $\tilde V_+=1+\zeta^2+\dots$ of Eq. (21). This construction is what transfers the exact spectral equality from the undeformed oscillator to the whole $\lambda$-family while changing the wavefunctions, and it is the mechanism behind the paper's claim that local probability densities can be altered without moving the energy levels.

What would settle it

Substitute $f(\zeta)=2e^{-\zeta^2}/(\sqrt{\pi}(\operatorname{erf}(\zeta)+\lambda))$ directly into the Bernoulli equation $f^2+2\zeta f+f'=0$ and simplify; if the left-hand side is not identically zero, then Eq. (21) is not an exactly isospectral deformation of $V=1+\zeta^2$. A complementary check is to diagonalize the Schrödinger operator with the potential of Eq. (21) numerically and compare its low-lying eigenvalues with $E_n=2\pi T(n+1)$; any nonzero deviation at numerical precision would settle the claim against exact isospectrality.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery, on the paper's own terms, is that the thermal-potential problem of a Schwarzschild black hole within the Fokker-Planck formalism is spectrally a scaled harmonic oscillator, and that supersymmetric isospectral deformation of that oscillator generates new potentials with the same spectrum but different eigenfunctions. With the thermal potential written as $f(x)=x/2-\pi T x^2$, the effective Schrödinger potential becomes $V(x)=\pi^2 T^2 D y^2+\pi T$ with $y=x-1/(4\pi T)$, and after the rescaling $\zeta=\sqrt{\pi T/D}\,y$ the eigenvalue equation takes the oscillator form $\pi T[-\partial_\zeta^2+1+\zeta^2]\Psi=E\Psi$. The paper identifies the superpotential $W(\zeta)=\zeta$, translates it to $\tilde W=W+f$ with $f(\zeta)=2e^{-\zeta^2}/(\sqrt{\pi}(\operatorname{erf}(\zeta)+\lambda))$, and obtains the deformed potential $\tilde V_+$ given in Eq. (21). The deformed potential has the same eigenvalues as the original oscillator but new ground-state and first-excited-state wavefunctions whose amplitudes and node positions depend on $\lambda$.

Load-bearing premise

The argument hinges on the claim that the chosen error-function correction satisfies the required differential identity exactly for all $\lambda$, so that the deformed potential keeps the oscillator's energy levels without approximation.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The thermal-fluctuation spectrum of the Schwarzschild black hole is discrete, $E_n=2\pi T(n+1)$, so thermodynamic sums over black-hole states become ordinary oscillator partition functions.
  • Isospectral deformation produces a one-parameter family of effective potentials with identical energy spectra, so spectral measurements alone cannot single out a unique thermal potential.
  • The deformed wavefunctions remain normalizable and vanish at infinity, while their node positions and amplitudes shift with $\lambda$, providing local control of probability densities at fixed spectrum.
  • The correspondence embeds the curved-spacetime Fokker-Planck problem into supersymmetric quantum mechanics, making tools such as shape invariance and partner Hamiltonians available for black-hole thermal diffusion.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper's claims, the same oscillator reduction should apply to any spherically symmetric black hole whose thermal potential is quadratic, yielding isospectral families with unchanged second-order fluctuation spectra in each case.
  • Read as a control parameter, $\lambda$ modifies the effective drift coefficient of the underlying stochastic process while leaving the spectrum intact, suggesting a concrete way to shape probability fluxes without altering thermal observables.
  • The paper's mention of the inverted-oscillator origin points to a natural extension: applying the isospectral construction to inverted oscillators in cosmological settings, where the deformed modes would share the same instability exponents while differing in localized profile.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper claims to re-analyze the Fokker-Planck equation for the thermal potential of a Schwarzschild black hole, reduce it to a scaled harmonic-oscillator Schrödinger problem, and then apply supersymmetric quantum-mechanical isospectral deformation to derive a one-parameter family of isospectral potentials with the same spectrum as the oscillator but different wavefunctions. Sections 2 and 3 review the FP-to-Schrödinger mapping and standard SUSY QM machinery; Section 4 contains the claimed construction, Eq. (21).

Significance. If the derivation were correct, the paper would provide a simple example of SUSY structure in black-hole thermal fluctuation dynamics, with an explicit one-parameter family sharing the oscillator spectrum. Some strengths are present: the earlier FP-to-oscillator reduction (Ref. [40]) is clearly cited, the SUSY formalism is presented in a self-contained way, and the expressions are explicit enough to check. However, the central algebraic step is invalid: Eq. (21) contradicts the paper's own Bernoulli condition, so the advertised new class of isospectral potentials is not derived. The only potentially correct version of the construction reproduces the standard Mielnik family, which is already known.

major comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 4, Eqs. (17)-(21)] Equation (21) does not follow from the stated construction. With \tilde W = \zeta + f, the paper's Eq. (13) gives \tilde V_+ = 1 + \zeta^2 + f^2 + 2\zeta f + f'. The Bernoulli condition (15) is exactly f^2 + 2\zeta f + f' = 0, so \tilde V_+ = 1 + \zeta^2 identically for any f satisfying it, including the f in Eq. (19). Thus the extra correction terms in Eq. (21) cannot arise from the translation method. Moreover, the denominator in Eq. (21) contains erf(\zeta)+1+\lambda, whereas Eq. (19) has erf(\zeta)+\lambda; this mismatch shows Eq. (21) is not obtained by substitution into Eq. (13). Since Eq. (21) is the paper's central new result, the main claim is unsupported.
  2. [Sec. 4, Eqs. (22)-(24)] Equations (22)-(24) inherit the same inconsistent denominator 1/(erf \zeta + 1 + \lambda), which does not correspond to the deformation function in Eq. (20). The proposed ground state and first excited state are therefore not wavefunctions of a Hamiltonian derived from the stated superpotential. If the construction is repaired to the standard Mielnik translation, the correction to 1+\zeta^2 either vanishes with the paper's V_+ convention or reduces to the known Mielnik family with the standard convention V_+=W^2-W'; in neither case is the family advertised here obtained.
  3. [Sec. 2, Eq. (5)] Equation (5) contains an algebra error: for f(x)=x/2-\pi T x^2, one has (1/(4D)) f'^2 = (\pi^2 T^2 / D) y^2, not (\pi^2 T^2 D) y^2. The missing factor 1/D is necessary for consistency with the definition \zeta=\sqrt{\pi T/D} y used in Eqs. (6) and (7). While Eq. (6) appears to use the correct scaling, the displayed potential in Eq. (5) is not the potential that yields Eq. (6).
  4. [Sec. 4, generality and novelty] Even if the algebra in Section 4 were corrected, the resulting family would be the standard Mielnik one-parameter isospectral deformation of the harmonic oscillator (see Ref. [18] and textbook treatments), not a new class. The manuscript does not compare its Eq. (21), or any corrected version, with the known Mielnik potential, so the claimed novelty is not established. This is load-bearing because the paper's stated purpose is to derive a new family of isospectral potentials.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. 2, Eq. (1) and Sec. 4, Eq. (18)] The symbol f is used both for the FP potential in Eq. (1) and for the isospectral deformation function in Eqs. (14)-(20). This is confusing and should be changed, for example to u(\zeta) for the deformation function.
  2. [Sec. 3, Eqs. (11)-(13)] With the standard definitions A=d/dx+W and A^\dagger=-d/dx+W, one obtains A^\dagger A = -d^2/dx^2 + W^2 - W' and A A^\dagger = -d^2/dx^2 + W^2 + W'. The signs in Eqs. (11)-(13) are therefore reversed relative to the usual convention; this should be stated explicitly or corrected, as it affects which partner potential is deformed.
  3. [Sec. 4, Figure 1] The figure panels are not described in the text with enough detail: the axes are unlabeled, and the text says only 'As depicted in Figure'. Axis labels and a clear statement of which panel corresponds to which quantity are needed to interpret the \lambda-dependence.
  4. [References] Reference [21] (Jensen, Nielsen, and Larsen, IEEE MLSP 2011) appears to be about Gaussian-process preference learning and seems unrelated to the scaling of superpotentials; this citation should be replaced or removed.
  5. [Throughout] There are numerous typos, including 'Bernouli', 'isopectral', 'matric', 'for for', and 'eigenspectra', which should be corrected in a revised version.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the isospectral family is a standard SUSY-QM construction applied to Xu's FP-oscillator reduction; the only self-citation is peripheral.

full rationale

The paper's main chain is not circular. The reduction of the Schwarzschild FP equation to a scaled harmonic oscillator (Eqs. 5-7 and 17) is taken from Xu [40] as an input result; no parameter is fitted and no data are used, so the oscillator spectrum is not a disguised fit. The one-parameter isospectral family is generated by the standard Mielnik translation construction (Eqs. 13-16, 18-20). The identical spectrum is mathematically guaranteed by the Bernoulli condition Eq. (15), so 'same energy spectrum' is a property of the construction rather than an independently predicted outcome; this is benign mathematical self-consistency, not circularity. The only self-citation is [22] (Baby-Shukla-Gupta), used in Sec. 4 to motivate the deformation, but the operative translation method is from Gangopadhyaya et al. [11] and Mielnik [18], so the self-citation is not load-bearing. There is a separate algebraic inconsistency: substituting Eq. (20) into V_+ = W^2 + W' forces V_+ = 1 + zeta^2 exactly by Eq. (15), so Eq. (21) does not follow; this is a correctness concern, not a circularity. The score of 2 reflects the minor self-citation; the central derivation is not circular.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new particles, forces, dimensions, or conservation laws are introduced. The isospectral potentials are new mathematical functions generated from the known oscillator potential, not new physical entities. The only free parameter is the isospectral parameter λ, and the main assumptions are the FP-to-Schrodinger transformation, the cited thermal potential, and the standard SUSY Bernoulli construction.

free parameters (1)
  • λ (isospectral deformation parameter)
    Appears in Eqs. (19) to (24). It parameterizes the one-parameter family of potentials and wavefunctions but is not fixed by data or by any independent physical condition. The additional '1' in the denominator of Eqs. (21) and (22) is an arbitrary convention.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption A Fokker-Planck equation with constant diffusion coefficient D and time-independent drift can be transformed into a Schrodinger equation via Ψ=e^{η/2}Φ with η=f/D.
    Section 2, Eqs. (1) to (3). This standard transformation assumes the drift derives from a potential f(x) and that appropriate boundary conditions hold; the paper does not state the validity domain or boundary conditions.
  • domain assumption The thermal potential for the Schwarzschild black hole is exactly f(x)=1/2 x - πT x^2.
    Section 2, after Eq. (4). Attributed to prior work (ref. [40]) without derivation. All subsequent oscillator and isospectral results inherit this potential choice.
  • standard math The Bernoulli equation f^2+2Wf+f'=0 with solution Eq. (16) generates isospectral deformations, and the harmonic oscillator superpotential is W(ζ)=ζ.
    Sections 3 and 4, Eqs. (14) to (20). This is standard SUSY QM from Mielnik's work (ref. [18]), but the manuscript applies it with an inconsistent identification of which partner potential is deformed, leading to the incorrect Eq. (21).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Analysis of the Fokker-Planck Equation in Schwarzschild Spacetime: A Supersymmetric Connection." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/JDYQZOLN

@misc{pith2026250604643,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Analysis of the Fokker-Planck Equation in Schwarzschild Spacetime: A Supersymmetric Connection},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/JDYQZOLN}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.04643}
}
read the original abstract

We have re-analyzed the dynamics of the thermal potential within Schwarzschild spacetime by employing the Fokker-Planck equation. We demonstrate that the Fokker-Planck equation reduces to a simplified form equivalent to a scaled quantum mechanical problem with a harmonic oscillator potential. In this framework, we highlight an interesting correspondence between supersymmetric quantum mechanics (SUSY QM) and the Fokker-Planck dynamics associated with the Schwarzschild metric. Utilizing the isospectral deformation, an intrinsic feature of SUSY QM, we derive a family of one-parameter isospectral potentials. Notably, this new class of potentials exhibits the same energy spectrum as the original harmonic oscillator potential, but with distinct wavefunctions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.04643 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. (a) Isospectral potential V˜+(x) (b) Ground state wavefunction for isospectral potential (c) First excited state for for various values of parameter λ. 5 Conclusions This paper highlights the significance of isospectral deformation within the framework of SUSY QM. Specifically, we investigate the FP equation associated with the Schwarzschild metric by employing the SUSY QM formalism, wherein the corresponding therma… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Multi-parameter isospectral Fokker-Planck equations

    math-ph 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A multi-parameter isospectral partner of any Fokker-Planck equation can be built by deleting and reinstating the n lowest eigenstates via Darboux-Crum transformations, with explicit formulas for all eigenstates and fo...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

41 extracted references · 41 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [40]

    Xu, Fokker-Planck equation for black holes in thermal potential, Phys

    Z.-M. Xu, Fokker-Planck equation for black holes in thermal potential, Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021) 104022

    work page 2021

  2. [18]

    Mielnik, Factorization method and new potentials with the oscillator spectrum, J

    B. Mielnik, Factorization method and new potentials with the oscillator spectrum, J. Math. Phys. 25 (1984) 3387–3389

    work page 1984

  3. [1]

    J. Wess, J. A. Bagger, Supersymmetry and Supergravity: Revised Edition, Princeton University Press, 2020

    work page 2020

  4. [2]

    Weinberg, The Quantum Theory of Fields: Volume 3, Supersymmetry, Cambridge University Press, 2005

    S. Weinberg, The Quantum Theory of Fields: Volume 3, Supersymmetry, Cambridge University Press, 2005

    work page 2005

  5. [3]

    Polchinski, Superstring Theory and Beyond, 2005

    J.G. Polchinski, Superstring Theory and Beyond, 2005

    work page 2005

  6. [4]

    Weinberg, The Quantum Theory of Fields: Volume 2, Cambridge University Press, 1995

    S. Weinberg, The Quantum Theory of Fields: Volume 2, Cambridge University Press, 1995

    work page 1995

  7. [5]

    Mann, An Introduction to Particle Physics and the Standard Model, Taylor and Francis, 2010

    R. Mann, An Introduction to Particle Physics and the Standard Model, Taylor and Francis, 2010

    work page 2010

  8. [6]

    Witten, Dynamical breaking of supersymmetry, Nucl

    E. Witten, Dynamical breaking of supersymmetry, Nucl. Phys. B188 (1981) 513–554

    work page 1981

Show all 41 references
  1. [7]

    Cooper, A

    F. Cooper, A. Khare, U. Sukhatme, Supersymmetry and quantum mechanics, Phys. Rep. 251 (1995) 267–385

    1995

  2. [8]

    Khare, U

    A. Khare, U. Sukhatme, Phase-equivalent potentials obtained from supersymmetry, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 22 (1989) 2847

    1989

  3. [9]

    R. Dutt, A. Khare, U.P. Sukhatme, Supersymmetry, shape invariance, and exactly solvable potentials, Am. J. Phys. 56 (1988) 163–168

    1988

  4. [10]

    Cooper, B

    F. Cooper, B. Freedman, Aspects of supersymmetric quantum mechanics, Ann. Phys. 146 (1983) 262–288

    1983

  5. [11]

    Gangopadhyaya, J.V

    A. Gangopadhyaya, J.V. Mallow, C. Rasinariu, Supersymmetric Quantum Mechanics: An Introduction, World Scientific, 2017

    2017

  6. [12]

    Scarf, New soluble energy band problem, Phys

    F.L. Scarf, New soluble energy band problem, Phys. Rev. 112 (1958) 1137

    1958

  7. [13]

    P¨ oschl, E

    G. P¨ oschl, E. Teller, Bemerkungen zur Quantenmechanik des anharmonischen Oszil- lators, Z. Phys. 83 (1933) 143–151. 8

    1933

  8. [14]

    A. Pal, S. Modak, A. Shukla, P.K. Panigrahi, PT-symmetry and supersymmetry: interconnection of broken and unbroken phases, Proc. R. Soc. A477 (2021) 20210494

    2021

  9. [15]

    Gangopadhyaya, J.V

    A. Gangopadhyaya, J.V. Mallow, U.P. Sukhatme, Broken supersymmetric shape in- variant systems and their potential algebras, Phys. Lett. A283 (2001) 279–284

    2001

  10. [16]

    L. ´E. Gendenshte ˘ ın, Derivation of exact spectra of the Schr¨ odinger equation by means of supersymmetry, JETP Lett. 38 (1983) 356–359

    1983

  11. [17]

    Bougie, A

    J. Bougie, A. Gangopadhyaya, J.V. Mallow, Generation of a complete set of additive shape-invariant potentials from an Euler equation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 (2010) 210402

    2010

  12. [19]

    Novikov, S.V

    S. Novikov, S.V. Manakov, L.P. Pitaevskii, V.E. Zakharov, Theory of Solitons: The Inverse Scattering Method, Springer, 1984

    1984

  13. [20]

    Sukumar, Supersymmetric quantum mechanics and the inverse scattering method, J

    C.V. Sukumar, Supersymmetric quantum mechanics and the inverse scattering method, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 18 (1985) 2937

    1985

  14. [21]

    Jensen, J.B

    B.S. Jensen, J.B. Nielsen, J. Larsen, Efficient preference learning with pairwise con- tinuous observations and Gaussian processes, in: Proc. IEEE Int. Workshop Mach. Learn. Signal Process., 2011, pp. 1–6

    2011

  15. [22]

    E. Baby, A. Shukla, S. Gupta, Bridging trails in reflectionless potential deformation: two paths and one horizon, Phys. Lett. A517 (2024) 129655

    2024

  16. [23]

    A novel class of isospectral deformations in supersymmetric quantum mechanics

    P. Roy, Comment on “A novel class of isospectral deformations in supersymmetric quantum mechanics” by B. Jensen, JHEP 10 (2012) 1–4

    2012

  17. [24]

    Klaiman, U

    S. Klaiman, U. G¨ unther, N. Moiseyev, Visualization of branch points in PT-symmetric waveguides, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101 (2008) 080402

    2008

  18. [25]

    Macho, R

    A. Macho, R. Llorente, C. Garc ´ ıa-Meca, Supersymmetric transformations in optical fibers, Phys. Rev. Appl. 9 (2018) 014024

    2018

  19. [26]

    ˇCtyrok´ y, V

    J. ˇCtyrok´ y, V. Kuzmiak, S. Eyderman, Waveguide structures with antisymmetric gain/loss profile, Opt. Express 18 (2010) 21585–21593

    2010

  20. [27]

    Heinrich, M.-A

    M. Heinrich, M.-A. Miri, S. St¨ utzer, R. El-Ganainy, S. Nolte, A. Szameit, D.N. Christodoulides, Supersymmetric mode converters, Nat. Commun. 5 (2014) 3698

    2014

  21. [28]

    Garc ´ ıa-Meca, A.M

    C. Garc ´ ıa-Meca, A.M. Ortiz, R. Llorente S´ aez, Supersymmetry in the time domain and its applications in optics, Nat. Commun. 11 (2020) 813

    2020

  22. [29]

    Moniz, Quantum Cosmology: The Supersymmetric Perspective Vol

    P.V. Moniz, Quantum Cosmology: The Supersymmetric Perspective Vol. 1: Funda- mentals, Springer, 2010. 9

    2010

  23. [30]

    Moniz, Quantum Cosmology: The Supersymmetric Perspective Vol

    P.V. Moniz, Quantum Cosmology: The Supersymmetric Perspective Vol. 2, Springer, 2010

    2010

  24. [31]

    Jalalzadeh, T

    S. Jalalzadeh, T. Rostami, P.V. Moniz, Quantum cosmology: from hidden symmetries towards a new (supersymmetric) perspective, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D25 (2016) 1630009

    2016

  25. [32]

    Jalalzadeh, S.M.M

    S. Jalalzadeh, S.M.M. Rasouli, P. Moniz, Shape invariant potentials in supersymmetric quantum cosmology, Universe 8 (2022) 316

    2022

  26. [33]

    Graham, D

    R. Graham, D. Roekaerts, Supersymmetric quantum mechanics and stochastic pro- cesses in curved configuration space, Phys. Lett. A109 (1985) 436–440

    1985

  27. [34]

    Graham, Lyapunov exponents and supersymmetry of stochastic dynamical systems, Europhys

    R. Graham, Lyapunov exponents and supersymmetry of stochastic dynamical systems, Europhys. Lett. 5 (1988) 101

    1988

  28. [35]

    Maldacena, S.H

    J. Maldacena, S.H. Shenker, D. Stanford, A bound on chaos, JHEP 08 (2016) 1–17

    2016

  29. [36]

    Cardoso, A.S

    V. Cardoso, A.S. Miranda, E. Berti, H. Witek, V.T. Zanchin, Geodesic stability, Lya- punov exponents, and quasinormal modes, Phys. Rev. D79 (2009) 064016

    2009

  30. [37]

    Lei, X.-H

    Y.-Q. Lei, X.-H. Ge, Circular motion of charged particles near a charged black hole, Phys. Rev. D105 (2022) 084011

    2022

  31. [38]

    Zwanzig, Nonequilibrium Statistical Mechanics, Oxford University Press, 2001

    R. Zwanzig, Nonequilibrium Statistical Mechanics, Oxford University Press, 2001

    2001

  32. [39]

    Risken, T.K

    H. Risken, T.K. Caughey, The Fokker-Planck Equation: Methods of Solution and Ap- plication, 1991

    1991

  33. [41]

    Cooper, J.N

    F. Cooper, J.N. Ginocchio, A. Khare, Relationship between supersymmetry and solv- able potentials, Phys. Rev. D36 (1987) 2458. 10

    1987

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.