Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 48 references

Lattice Mismatch Driven In Plane Strain Engineering for Enhanced Upper Critical Fields in Mo2N Superconducting Thin Films

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Epitaxial Mo2N films with identical composition reach upper critical fields of about 7 T on MgO versus about 5.1 T on Al2O3, a >25% enhancement the paper attributes to compressive in-plane strain strengthening electron-phonon coupling.

desk verdict Real 2 T Hc2 difference between two epitaxial Mo2N films, but the strain mechanism is asserted rather than isolated; worth reviewing for the data. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.04750 v1 pith:AJQ6676N submitted 2025-06-05 cond-mat.supr-con cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Aditya Singh , Divya Rawat , Victor Hjort , Abhisek Mishra , Arnaud le Febvrier , Subhankar Bedanta , Per Eklund , Ajay Soni This is my paper
classification cond-mat.supr-concond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords molybdenumnitridethinfilmsuppercriticalfieldstrainengineeringelectron-phononcouplingtype-IIsuperconductivityepitaxialmagnetronsputteringlatticemismatch
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that the choice of substrate can be used as a strain knob to tune superconductivity in molybdenum nitride thin films. Sputtered, epitaxial Mo2N films with nearly identical composition (Mo2N0.96 and Mo2N0.97) become superconducting at 5.2 K on c-plane Al2O3 and 5.6 K on MgO(111), and the zero-temperature upper critical field rises from ~5.1 T to ~7 T, a >25% increase. The authors attribute this to in-plane compressive strain on MgO, versus tensile strain on Al2O3, strengthening electron-phonon coupling and flux pinning. If correct, strain engineering via lattice-mismatched substrates is a practical handle for tuning superconducting nitrides without changing chemistry.

What carries the argument

The argument runs on a two-sample strain comparison. Substrate lattice mismatch sets the in-plane strain sign: MgO(111) puts the film under compression (the Mo2N 200 pole appears at $\Psi \approx 55.5^\circ$ versus the stress-free MgO value of $54.7^\circ$), while c-plane Al2O3 puts it under tension, inferred from the shift of the Mo2N (111) peak relative to the stress-free position at $2\theta \approx 37.4^\circ$. The superconducting output is extracted with the Ginzburg-Landau form $H_{c2}(T)=H_{c2}(0)(1-t^2)/(1+t^2)$, the Werthamer-Helfand-Hohenberg orbital limit $H_{c2}^{\mathrm{orb}}(0)=-0.693\,T_c\,(dH_{c2}/dT)_{T_c}$, the Maki parameter $\alpha=\sqrt{2}\,H_{c2}^{\mathrm{orb}}(0)/H_p(0)$, and McMillan's formula for $\lambda_{e-ph}$ with $\mu^*=0.13$. The strain-to-superconductivity link is carried by the claim that compressive strain flattens electronic bands, raises the density of states near the Fermi level, and strengthens electron-phonon coupling.

What would settle it

Grow Mo2N films on buffer layers that vary the in-plane strain continuously while holding roughness, grain size, and residual resistivity fixed; if the upper critical field does not track the strain sign, the strain mechanism fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that substrate-induced in-plane strain is what separates the superconducting performance of two otherwise identical Mo2N films. On c-plane Al2O3, where the epitaxial relationship puts the film under in-plane tensile strain, the zero-temperature upper critical field is $H_{c2}(0) \approx 5.1$ T and $T_c \approx 5.2$ K; on MgO(111), where the film is under in-plane compressive strain, $H_{c2}(0) \approx 7$ T and $T_c \approx 5.6$ K. The authors interpret the approximately 25% field enhancement as a strain-driven increase in electron-phonon coupling ($\lambda_{e-ph} \approx 0.76$ versus $\approx 0.75$ from McMillan's relation) and in flux-pinning potential, with both films remaining orbital-limited strong type-II superconductors.

Load-bearing premise

The whole comparison presupposes that the ~2 T difference in upper critical field is caused by the sign of in-plane strain, even though the Al2O3 and MgO films also differ in roughness (2 nm versus 5 nm), grain size, void density, and residual resistivity, and no experiment separates strain from those structural differences.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A >25% higher upper critical field at nearly fixed stoichiometry means substrate selection alone can expand the usable field range of Mo2N films.
  • Because the Maki parameters remain below 1 (0.64 and 0.8), the strain enhancement does not change the pair-breaking limit; both films stay orbital-limited.
  • The short Ginzburg-Landau coherence lengths (8.01 nm and 6.85 nm) and large GL parameters (24.6 and 60.7) place these films firmly in the type-II flux-pinning regime.
  • The modest $T_c$ gain (0.4 K) alongside the larger $H_{c2}$ gain (about 1.9 T) marks the upper critical field as the more strain-sensitive superconducting parameter in this material.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper's two-substrate comparison, the same mechanism predicts that a substrate or buffer with larger compressive mismatch should push $H_{c2}$ further upward in Mo2N, and that tensile mismatch should suppress it; this is directly testable.
  • The reported electron-phonon coupling differs by only about 0.01 between the films while $H_{c2}$ differs by about 25%, which suggests the field enhancement may involve strain-altered disorder or pinning rather than pairing strength alone, an interpretation the paper does not make.
  • The strain-engineering logic transfers naturally to other transition-metal nitrides such as VN and NbN, where lattice-matched substrates are already used; a systematic substrate series would show whether the $H_{c2}$ response to strain is a general nitride feature.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports a comparative study of superconducting Mo2N thin films grown by DC magnetron sputtering on c-plane Al2O3 and MgO(111) substrates. The authors find Tc ~5.2 K and ~5.6 K and upper critical fields Hc2(0) ~5.1 T and ~7 T for MN/Al2O3 and MN/MgO, respectively. They attribute the ~25% Hc2 enhancement to compressive in-plane strain on MgO versus tensile strain on Al2O3, which they argue increases electron-phonon coupling, flux pinning, and superconducting performance. The paper includes structural characterization (XRD, pole figures, ERDA, XRR, SEM/AFM), transport and magnetization measurements, and analysis with GL, WHH, and McMillan models.

Significance. If the central mechanistic claim were established, the result would be a clean demonstration of substrate-induced strain engineering of Hc2 in a transition-metal nitride, with practical relevance for superconducting thin-film devices. The manuscript is strengthened by detailed compositional (ToF-ERDA), structural (XRD, pole figures), and morphological characterization, and by the consistency of Tc from transport and magnetization. However, the strain mechanism is not isolated from other film-to-film variations, and the electron-phonon coupling values used to support the mechanism are derived from the same Tc data they are invoked to explain. The measured Hc2 difference is plausible, but the attribution to strain remains a hypothesis rather than a demonstrated conclusion.

major comments (4)
  1. [Results, page 6 and Conclusion]
  2. [Section D of Supporting Information (McMillan analysis)]
  3. [Table 1 and GL fits (page 7)]
  4. [XRD strain analysis (page 4-5)]
minor comments (4)
  1. [Page 7]
  2. [Throughout]
  3. [Page 8, Maki parameter]
  4. [Figure 3 and Table 1]

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 5.0 of 10

The strain/e-ph mechanism is partly circular: the e-ph coupling constants are computed from the same Tc via McMillan's relation and then cited as the cause of the Tc/Hc2 enhancement; the measured Hc2 difference itself is independent.

  1. self definitional [Results and Discussion, e-ph coupling paragraph (p. 6); Supporting Information Section D]
    "The e-ph coupling strength, estimated using McMillan’s relation[35] with a Coulomb pseudopotential μ*=0.13, is found to be ~ 0.75 for MN/Al₂O₃ and ~ 0.76 for MN/MgO (Section D in Supporting Information). This result highlights the enhancement of e-ph interactions due to compressive strain in MN/MgO compared to the tensile strain in MN/Al₂O₃."

    The paper uses the McMillan formula to convert the measured Tc and Bloch-Grüneisen-fitted ΘR into λ_el-ph, then uses the resulting λ values as evidence that compressive strain enhances electron-phonon coupling and thereby raises Tc/Hc2. This is a restatement of the input data: for fixed μ*, λ is a function of Tc/ΘR, so a higher Tc gives a higher λ by construction. The λ values carry no independent information beyond the Tc and ΘR from which they were computed. Thus the strain/e-ph mechanism claim reduces to the observed Tc difference rather than being confirmed by an independent measurement. The measured Hc2 enhancement itself is not circular, which limits the overall score.

full rationale

The measured upper critical fields are extracted from low-temperature magnetoresistance and fitted with the Ginzburg-Landau expression, so the central experimental result (Hc2 ~5.1 T vs ~7 T) is an independent observation. The circularity is confined to the interpretive step: the e-ph coupling constants are not measured independently but calculated from the same Tc (and fitted ΘR) that they are invoked to explain, making the strain-induced e-ph enhancement argument partly tautological. The alternative explanations based on roughness, grain morphology, density, and scattering are real experimental confounders but are not circularity; they affect correctness. The self-citations in the paper are to deposition and cleaning methods and are not load-bearing for the scientific claims. Overall, the paper contains one partial circular step in the mechanism attribution, while the headline Hc2 data remain non-circular.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

Quantitative outputs depend on standard superconductivity models (GL, WHH, McMillan) and on fitted or assumed inputs: the Coulomb pseudopotential mu*=0.13, Debye temperatures from Bloch-Grueneisen fits (194 and 201 K), the BG exponent n=5, and an assumed unstrained reference peak at 2theta=37.4 degrees. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (4)
  • Coulomb pseudopotential mu* = 0.13 (assumed)
    Used in McMillan's formula to convert Tc and Debye temperature into lambda. Value taken from prior transition-metal literature; not measured here.
  • Debye temperature Theta_R for MN/Al2O3 = 194 K
    Result of Bloch-Grueneisen fit to resistivity (Figure S4). Enters the McMillan estimate.
  • Debye temperature Theta_R for MN/MgO = 201 K
    Result of Bloch-Grueneisen fit to resistivity (Figure S4). Enters the McMillan estimate.
  • Bloch-Grueneisen exponent n = 5 (fixed)
    Set to the standard metallic value in the resistivity fit; a different n changes the derived Debye temperatures.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Conventional BCS/McMillan electron-phonon theory applies to Mo2N films.
    Justifies using McMillan's formula to extract lambda from Tc and Theta_R (Supporting Information, Section D).
  • domain assumption The unstrained Mo2N (111) reflection is at 2theta = 37.4 degrees.
    Used on page 5 to label the Al2O3 film as tensile and the MgO film as compressive; no stress-free measurement in the paper.
  • domain assumption Ginzburg-Landau Hc2(T) formula remains valid for extrapolation to 0 K.
    Hc2(0) values in Table 1 are obtained by extrapolating the GL form to T=0.
  • domain assumption Resistivity is dominated by electron-phonon scattering described by the Bloch-Grueneisen model with n=5.
    Used to obtain Debye temperatures from resistivity data (Figure S4).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Lattice Mismatch Driven In Plane Strain Engineering for Enhanced Upper Critical Fields in Mo2N Superconducting Thin Films." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/AJQ6676N

@misc{pith2026250604750,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Lattice Mismatch Driven In Plane Strain Engineering for Enhanced Upper Critical Fields in Mo2N Superconducting Thin Films},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/AJQ6676N}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.04750}
}
read the original abstract

Transition metal nitrides are a fascinating class of hard coating material that provide an excellent platform for investigating superconductivity and fundamental electron phonon interactions. In this work the structural morphological and superconducting properties have been studied for Mo2N thin films deposited via direct current magnetron sputtering on cplane Al2O3 and MgO substrates to elucidate the effect of internal strain on superconducting properties. High resolution X Ray diffraction and time of flight elastic recoil detection analysis confirms the growth of single phase Mo2N thin films exhibiting epitaxial growth with twin domain structure. Low temperature electrical transport measurements reveal superconducting transitions at 5.2 K and 5.6 K with corresponding upper critical fields of 5 T and 7 T for the films deposited on Al2O3 and MgO, respectively. These results indicate strong type II superconductivity and the observed differences in superconducting properties are attributed to substrate induced strain which leads to higher e ph coupling for the film on MgO substrate. These findings highlight the tunability of superconducting properties in Mo2N films through strategic substrate selection.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.04750 by the authors.

Figure 5
Figure 5. Phase diagram showing the superconducting, intermediate, and normal state of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

48 extracted references · 48 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Engel, A

    A. Engel, A. Aeschbacher, K. Inderbitzin, A. Schilling, K. Il’in, M. Hofherr, M. Siegel, A. Semenov, and H.- W. Hübers, Tantalum nitride superconducting single -photon detectors with low cut -off energy. Applied Physics Letters, 2012. 100(6)

    work page 2012

  2. [2]

    del Valle, J

    J. del Valle, J. G. Ramírez, M. J. Rozenberg, and I. K. Schuller, Challenges in materials and devices for resistive-switching-based neuromorphic computing. Journal of Applied Physics, 2018. 124(21)

    work page 2018

  3. [3]

    Y . Zou, Q. Jin, Y . Wang, K. Jiang, S. Wang, Y . Li, E.-J. Guo, and Z. G. Cheng, Tuning superconductivity in vanadium nitride films by adjusting strain. Physical Review B, 2022. 105(22): p. 224516

    work page 2022

  4. [4]

    Y . Zhou, W. Guo, and T. Li, A review on transition metal nitrides as electrode materials for supercapacitors. Ceramics International, 2019. 45(17): p. 21062-21076. 12

    work page 2019

  5. [5]

    S. A. Rasaki, B. Zhang, K. Anbalgam, T. Thomas, and M. Yang, Synthesis and application of nano-structured metal nitrides and carbides: A review. Progress in Solid State Chemistry, 2018. 50: p. 1-15

    work page 2018

  6. [6]

    Ningthoujam and N

    R. Ningthoujam and N. Gajbhiye, Synthesis, electron transport properties of transition metal nitrides and applications. Progress in Materials Science, 2015. 70: p. 50-154

    work page 2015

  7. [7]

    Isaev, R

    E. Isaev, R. Ahuja, S. Simak, A. Lichtenstein, Y . K. Vekilov, B. Johansson, and I. Abrikosov, Anomalously enhanced superconductivity and ab initio lattice dynamics in transition metal carbides and nitrides. Physical Review B, 2005. 72(6): p. 064515

    work page 2005

  8. [8]

    S. Wang, D. Antonio, X. Yu, J. Zhang, A. L. Cornelius, D. He, and Y . Zhao, The hardest superconducting metal nitride. Scientific reports, 2015. 5(1): p. 13733

    work page 2015

Show all 48 references
  1. [9]

    L. M. Corliss, N. Elliott, and J. M. Hastings, Antiferromagnetic Structure of CrN. Physical Review, 1960. 117(4): p. 929-935

    1960

  2. [10]

    Jin, et al., Strain-Mediated High Conductivity in Ultrathin Antiferromagnetic Metallic Nitrides

    Q. Jin, et al., Strain-Mediated High Conductivity in Ultrathin Antiferromagnetic Metallic Nitrides. Advanced Materials, 2021. 33(2): p. 2005920

    2021

  3. [11]

    Chen, et al., Hard superconducting nitrides

    X.-J. Chen, et al., Hard superconducting nitrides. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2005. 102(9): p. 3198-3201

    2005

  4. [12]

    S. T. Oyama, Introduction to the chemistry of transition metal carbides and nitrides , in The Chemistry of Transition Metal Carbides and Nitrides, S.T. Oyama, Editor. 1996, Springer Netherlands: Dordrecht. p. 1-27

    1996

  5. [13]

    Zhong, X

    Y . Zhong, X. Xia, F. Shi, J. Zhan, J. Tu, and H. J. Fan, Transition Metal Carbides and Nitrides in Energy Storage and Conversion. Advanced Science, 2016. 3(5): p. 1500286

    2016

  6. [14]

    Kokubo and B

    N. Kokubo and B. Gerelkhuu, NbTiN SQUID-on-tip fabricated by self-aligned deposition using reactive DC magnetron sputtering. Applied Physics Letters, 2024. 124(26)

    2024

  7. [15]

    Zhang, et al., The on-chip scanning probe with dual niobium nitride nanoscale superconducting quantum interference devices for magnetic imaging at the high temperature

    D. Zhang, et al., The on-chip scanning probe with dual niobium nitride nanoscale superconducting quantum interference devices for magnetic imaging at the high temperature. Superconductor Science and Technology,

  8. [16]

    Tureson, et al., Effect of ion-implantation-induced defects and Mg dopants on the thermoelectric properties of ScN

    N. Tureson, et al., Effect of ion-implantation-induced defects and Mg dopants on the thermoelectric properties of ScN. Physical Review B, 2018. 98(20): p. 205307

    2018

  9. [17]

    Stöber, J

    L. Stöber, J. P. Konrath, V . Haberl, F. Patocka, M. Schneider, and U. Schmid, Nitrogen incorporation in sputter deposited molybdenum nitride thin films. Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology A, 2016. 34(2): p. 021513

    2016

  10. [18]

    Haberkorn, S

    N. Haberkorn, S. Bengio, S. Suárez, P. D. Pérez, M. Sirena, and J. Guimpel, Effect of the nitrogen-argon gas mixtures on the superconductivity properties of reactively sputtered molybdenum nitride thin films. Materials Letters, 2018. 215: p. 15-18

    2018

  11. [19]

    Inumaru, K

    K. Inumaru, K. Baba, and S. Yamanaka, Superconducting molybdenum nitride epitaxial thin films deposited on MgO and α-Al2O3 substrates by molecular beam epitaxy. Applied Surface Science, 2006. 253(5): p. 2863- 2869

    2006

  12. [20]

    Haberkorn, S

    N. Haberkorn, S. Bengio, H. Troiani, S. Suárez, P. D. Pérez, P. Granell, F. Golmar, M. Sirena, and J. Guimpel, Thickness dependence of the superconducting properties of γ- Mo2N thin films on Si (001) grown by DC sputtering at room temperature. Materials Chemistry and Physics, ...

    2018

  13. [21]

    Kuzmiak, M

    M. Kuzmiak, M. Kopčík, F. Košuth, V . Vaňo, P. Szabó, V . Latyshev, V . Komanický, and P. Samuely, Suppressed Superconductivity in Ultrathin Mo 2N Films due to Pair -Breaking at the Interface. Journal of Superconductivity and Novel Magnetism, 2022. 35(7): p. 1775-1780

    2022

  14. [22]

    Bekaert, C

    J. Bekaert, C. Sevik, and M. V . Milošević, First-principles exploration of superconductivity in MXenes. Nanoscale, 2020. 12(33): p. 17354-17361

    2020

  15. [23]

    Abrecht, D

    M. Abrecht, D. Ariosa, D. Cloetta, S. Mitrovic, M. Onellion, X. X. Xi, G. Margaritondo, and D. Pavuna, Strain and High Temperature Superconductivity: Unexpected Results from Direct Electronic Structure Measurements in Thin Films. Physical Review Letters, 2003. 91(5): p. 057002

    2003

  16. [24]

    Stampe, M

    P. Stampe, M. Bullock, W. Tucker, and R. J. Kennedy, Growth of MgO thin films on M -, A-, C-and R-plane sapphire by laser ablation. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, 1999. 32(15): p. 1778

    1999

  17. [25]

    R. Li, J. S. Gandhi, R. Pillai, R. Forrest, D. Starikov, and A. Bensaoula, Epitaxial growth of (111)-oriented ZrxTi1− xN thin films on c-plane Al2O3 substrates. Journal of crystal growth, 2014. 404: p. 1-8

    2014

  18. [26]

    Z. Dai, A. Miyashita, S. Yamamoto, K. Narumi, and H. Naramoto, Crystalline and nearly stoichiometric vanadium nitride thin film by PLD. Thin Solid Films, 1999. 347(1-2): p. 117-120. 13

    1999

  19. [27]

    Bai, et al., Charge-carrier-type controlled superconducting dome in ZrN xOy

    X. Bai, et al., Charge-carrier-type controlled superconducting dome in ZrN xOy. Physical Review Materials,

  20. [28]

    R. Jha, B. Tiwari, P. Rani, H. Kishan, and V . P. S. Awana, Robust superconductivity with large upper critical field in Nb2PdS5. Journal of Applied Physics, 2014. 115(21)

    2014

  21. [29]

    Nabeshima, Y

    F. Nabeshima, Y . Imai, M. Hanawa, I. Tsukada, and A. Maeda, Enhancement of the superconducting transition temperature in FeSe epitaxial thin films by anisotropic compression. Applied Physics Letters, 2013. 103(17): p. 172602

    2013

  22. [30]

    B. Wang, K. Matsubayashi, Y . Uwatoko, and K. Ohgushi, High Pressure Effect on the Superconductivity in VN. Journal of the Physical Society of Japan, 2015. 84(10): p. 104706

    2015

  23. [31]

    Pentin, Y

    I. Pentin, Y . Vakhtomin, V . Seleznev, and K. Smirnov, Hot electron energy relaxation time in vanadium nitride superconducting film structures under THz and IR radiation. Scientific Reports, 2020. 10(1): p. 16819

    2020

  24. [32]

    A. K. Verma, R. Gupta, S. Prakash, A. Gloskovskii, S. Kalal, P. Tiwari, V . R. Reddy, R. Rawat, and M. Gupta, Structure and Superconductivity of Epitaxial and Polycrystalline VN Thin Films. ACS Applied Electronic Materials, 2024. 6(7): p. 5029-5035

    2024

  25. [34]

    A. Bid, A. Bora, and A. K. Raychaudhuri, Temperature dependence of the resistance of metallic nanowires of diameter ≥ 15nm: Applicability of Bloch-Grüneisen theorem. Physical Review B, 2006. 74(3): p. 035426

    2006

  26. [35]

    W. L. McMillan, Transition Temperature of Strong -Coupled Superconductors. Physical Review, 1968. 167(2): p. 331-344

    1968

  27. [36]

    A. S. Ilin, et al., Superconductivity in thin films of RuN. Physical Review Materials, 2024. 8(7): p. 074801

    2024

  28. [37]

    Horide, T

    T. Horide, T. Maekawa, T. Aikawa, T. Kitamura, and K. Nakamura, Tc and resistivity variation induced by external bending strain in flexible film of strain -sensitive (La,Sr) 2CuO4. Physical Review Materials, 2024. 8(9): p. 094802

    2024

  29. [38]

    Zhang, et al., Wafer-Scale Epitaxy of Flexible Nitride Films with Superior Plasmonic and Superconducting Performance

    R. Zhang, et al., Wafer-Scale Epitaxy of Flexible Nitride Films with Superior Plasmonic and Superconducting Performance. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2021. 13(50): p. 60182-60191

    2021

  30. [39]

    N. R. Werthamer, E. Helfand, and P. C. Hohenberg, Temperature and Purity Dependence of the Superconducting Critical Field, Hc2. III. Electron Spin and Spin-Orbit Effects. Physical Review, 1966. 147(1): p. 295-302

    1966

  31. [40]

    A. M. Clogston, Upper Limit for the Critical Field in Hard Superconductors. Physical Review Letters, 1962. 9(6): p. 266-267

    1962

  32. [41]

    Maki, Effect of Pauli Paramagnetism on Magnetic Properties of High -Field Superconductors

    K. Maki, Effect of Pauli Paramagnetism on Magnetic Properties of High -Field Superconductors. Physical Review, 1966. 148(1): p. 362-369

    1966

  33. [42]

    Falkowski, Z

    M. Falkowski, Z. Śniadecki, T. J. Bednarchuk, and A. Kowalczyk, Structural and physical properties of the II-type superconductor Nb5Si2B. Journal of Applied Physics, 2023. 133(24)

    2023

  34. [43]

    Le Febvrier, L

    A. Le Febvrier, L. Landälv, T. Liersch, D. Sandmark, P. Sandström, and P. Eklund, An upgraded ultra-high vacuum magnetron-sputtering system for high-versatility and software-controlled deposition. Vacuum, 2021. 187: p. 110137

    2021

  35. [44]

    Le Febvrier, J

    A. Le Febvrier, J. Jensen, and P. Eklund, Wet-cleaning of MgO(001): Modification of surface chemistry and effects on thin film growth investigated by x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectroscopy. Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology A, ...

    2017

  36. [45]

    Mayer, et al., Ion beam analysis of fusion plasma-facing materials and components: facilities and research challenges

    M. Mayer, et al., Ion beam analysis of fusion plasma-facing materials and components: facilities and research challenges. Nuclear Fusion, 2019. 60(2): p. 025001

    2019

  37. [46]

    Arstila, et al., Potku–New analysis software for heavy ion elastic recoil detection analysis

    K. Arstila, et al., Potku–New analysis software for heavy ion elastic recoil detection analysis. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms, 2014. 331: p. 34-41. 14 Supporting Information Lattice Mismatch-Driven In...

    2014

  38. [47]

    J. M. Ziman, Electrons and phonons: the theory of transport phenomena in solids . 2001: Oxford university press

    2001

  39. [48]

    A. Bid, A. Bora, and A. K. Raychaudhuri, Temperature dependence of the resistance of metallic nanowires of diameter ≥ 15nm: Applicability of Bloch -Grüneisen theorem. Physical Review B, 2006. 74(3): p. 035426

    2006

  40. [49]

    W. L. McMillan, Transition Temperature of Strong-Coupled Superconductors. Physical Review, 1968. 167(2): p. 331-344

    1968

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.