Controlling rovibrational state populations of polar molecules in inhomogeneous electric fields of the Stark deceleration: molecular dynamics and quantum chemistry simulations

Andrey Yachmenev; Emil Zak; Jochen K\"upper

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 55 references

Controlling rovibrational state populations of polar molecules in inhomogeneous electric fields of the Stark deceleration: molecular dynamics and quantum chemistry simulations

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper shows that the dc fields already present in a Stark decelerator can drive a >99.5% adiabatic population inversion in ammonia, enabling an alternating-states deceleration that uses about half the stages and captures 2–3 times…

desk verdict The dc-field-chirped SCRAP idea is genuinely new and the on-axis quantum dynamics are credible, but the trajectory gains hinge on an untested 3D transfer-efficiency assumption. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.04798 v1 pith:DLRU6NXS submitted 2025-06-05 physics.atom-ph physics.chem-ph

Emil Zak , Jochen Küpper , Andrey Yachmenev This is my paper

classification physics.atom-phphysics.chem-ph

keywords Starkdecelerationrapidadiabaticpassagepopulationinversionammoniaalternatingstatescoldmoleculesrovibrationalstatecontrolphase-spaceacceptance

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

At the center of this paper is a practical upgrade to Stark deceleration: the inhomogeneous dc electric fields that already exist between the electrodes are used as the chirp in Stark-chirped rapid adiabatic passage, so a weak fixed-frequency pump alone inverts the populations of ammonia's weak-field-seeking and strong-field-seeking $|1,1,1\rangle$ states with better than 99.5% efficiency over a wide range of positions. This removes the need for the intense, far-off-resonance Stark pulse of standard SCRAP and avoids the lossy option of switching the dc field off. The authors combine this switching with an alternating-states deceleration sequence in which molecules are transferred between weak- and strong-field-seeking states near the potential minima and maxima, so they lose kinetic energy on both the rising and falling sides of every electrode stage. Classical-dynamics simulations for ammonia show that this captures 2–3 times more molecules and requires roughly half as many deceleration stages as standard alternating-gradient deceleration, with final molecular fractions rising from about 24% to 38–53% when slowing from 300 m/s to 270 m/s. If the scheme works as simulated, existing Stark decelerators could be upgraded with a microwave pump and fast high-voltage switches to produce denser, slower cold-molecule beams.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the voltage-rise function $V(t)$, a smoothed exponential ramp from $V_{\min}$ to $V_{\max}$ over $t_{\max}=130$ ns whose steepness parameter $a$ is optimized between 0.030 and 0.070 ns$^{-1}$. As $V(t)$ rises, the dc Stark shift $\Delta_{\mathrm{dc}}(\mathbf{r},t)$ sweeps the inversion-split transition frequency through the fixed pump frequency $\hbar\omega_p=0.797$ cm$^{-1}$, realizing rapid adiabatic passage without a separate Stark laser. The second load-bearing element is the state occupation function $W(t)=\pm1$ in the trajectory equation: molecules ride the weak-field-seeking potential on the rising field and the strong-field-seeking potential on the falling field, so the effective potential always slopes upward against the beam. The synchronous phase angle $\phi_0$ determines when voltages and states are switched.

What would settle it

Run the same time-dependent Schrödinger calculation at $V_{\min}=300$ V/cm and at off-axis positions inside the decelerator unit cell; if the population transfer drops below the roughly 99.5% threshold over the full acceptance volume, the predicted density gain and halved stage count would not be realized. Experimentally, a comparison of alternating-states and alternating-gradient time-of-flight spectra at equal stage numbers should show about twice the slow-molecule peak area if the central claim is correct.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The discovery is a state-switching protocol for Stark deceleration built on a modified SCRAP. In the standard SCRAP, a strong far-off-resonance Stark pulse chirps a transition through resonance with a fixed-frequency pump; here the dc voltage ramp of the decelerator itself produces the chirp, so the resonance condition $\Delta E_{\mathrm{res}} + \Delta_{\mathrm{dc}}(\mathbf{r}, t_{\mathrm{res}}) = \hbar\omega_p$ is swept for every position $\mathbf{r}$ in an extended acceptance volume. Solving the time-dependent Schrödinger equation with a spectroscopic ammonia potential energy surface and an ab initio dipole-moment surface, the authors obtain 99.8% transfer between the symmetric and antisymmetric $|1,1,1\rangle$ states at the field-maximum position for a voltage-rise parameter $a=0.030$ ns$^{-1}$, and more than 99.5% transfer over a broad range of longitudinal positions for $a$ between 0.030 and 0.070 ns$^{-1}$. In the resulting alternating-states scheme, molecules are moved between weak-field-seeking and strong-field-seeking states near the potential minimum and maximum while the fields remain on; classical-dynamics simulations from an initial velocity of 300 m/s show that reaching 270 m/s takes 11–18 stages instead of 22–27, with the captured molecular fraction rising from 24–26% to 38–53%, and a slight potential modulation (ASMP) further raises the captured fraction at the cost of less slowing per stage.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing assumption is that the near-perfect population transfer, computed for one on-axis position with $V_{\min}=0$, also happens instantaneously and uniformly for every molecule in the three-dimensional acceptance volume, including off-axis positions and while the field is held at the roughly 300 V/cm minimum needed to avoid Majorana losses.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

For ammonia starting at 300 m/s, reaching 270 m/s takes 11 stages at $\phi_0=80^\circ$ with AS instead of 22 with AG, and reaching 240 m/s takes 21 instead of 42 stages.
Final molecular number densities for packets slowed to 270 m/s rise from 24% (AG) to 38% (AS) at $\phi_0=80^\circ$, and the ASMP variant raises this to 53%.
The population inversion stays above 99.5% over a wide range of longitudinal positions when the voltage-rise parameter lies between 0.030 and 0.070 ns$^{-1}$, giving the scheme tolerance to beam spread.
All three schemes produce similar transverse velocity spreads at $\phi_0=80^\circ$, so the longitudinal gains in AS and ASMP do not come at the price of transverse heating.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

A natural extension not developed in the paper is a full three-dimensional TDSE scan at the experimental minimum field $V_{\min}\approx 300$ V/cm and at off-axis positions; such a scan would test whether the acceptance-volume assumption holds outside the single on-axis geometry.
The same dc-field-chirp mechanism could plausibly be transferred to other molecules with closely spaced inversion doublets, such as ND$_3$, or to time-varying fields in traveling-wave and chip decelerators, where an intense Stark laser is inconvenient.
Because the halved stage count lowers the demand on maximum field strength, the scheme could make Stark deceleration practical for heavier or less polar molecules that are currently difficult to slow with alternating-gradient deceleration.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

You should know two things about this one. First, the core idea—replacing the laser Stark pulse in SCRAP with the decelerator's own rising dc field—is genuinely new and practical. Second, the headline numbers (2–3× acceptance, half the stages) are only as good as the assumption that the 99.8% transfer computed on-axis at zero minimum field holds everywhere in the 3D acceptance volume, and that assumption is not tested in the paper.

The quantum simulations are careful: full-dimensional PES and dipole surfaces, TROVE/RichMol, a basis of rovibrational states, and a clear sweep over the voltage-rise parameter and longitudinal position. The on-axis transfer efficiency above 99.5% over a wide range of the chirp parameter is convincing. The trajectory simulations are also standard, and comparing AG, AS, and ASMP with the same initial distribution is a fair way to show the qualitative benefit of alternating-state deceleration.

The soft spot is exactly what the stress-test note says. The transfer efficiency is computed only along the beam axis (z between zmin and zmax) and with Vmin=0. The paper itself says the real decelerator stays above 300 V/cm to avoid Majorana losses. Off-axis molecules see different field strengths and, more importantly, different field directions relative to the fixed pump polarization. That changes both the chirp rate and the Rabi frequency, so the adiabatic passage can fail for a significant fraction of the packet. Equation (4) has W(t)=±1 with no loss term, so the trajectory simulation assumes perfect switching at every event. The 0.4% loss estimate only reflects the on-axis case. If the 3D transfer efficiency were, say, 90% per event, the scheme would leak molecules after a few stages. That is a load-bearing extrapolation. It is not a fatal flaw—the authors explicitly acknowledge the Vmin issue and could address it by running the TDSE at off-axis positions and nonzero Vmin—but the quantitative claims in Table I are currently unsupported.

A second, minor issue: the initial phase-space distribution in the trajectory simulations is narrower than typical beams. That is stated, and it does not affect the relative comparison, but it means the absolute percentages in Table I should not be read as real beam capture fractions.

The paper is for people working on Stark deceleration, cold molecules, and coherent control. The idea of using the decelerator's field as a chirp is worth thinking about even if the numbers turn out optimistic. It deserves a serious referee: the quantum machinery is credible, the proposal is concrete, and the gap is addressable. I would send it to review, with the request that the authors either run the 3D quantum simulations or soften the claims and state the assumption clearly. Conditional accept in its current form, not a reject.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a modified Stark-chirped rapid adiabatic passage (SCRAP) scheme in which the time-dependent dc electric field inside a Stark decelerator provides the chirp, enabling coherent population transfer between the weak-field-seeking and strong-field-seeking components of the |1,1,1> inversion doublet of ammonia. Full-dimensional rovibrational wavefunctions from TROVE/RichMol are used in time-dependent Schrödinger equation simulations, and the authors report a 99.8% population transfer for an on-axis position with zero minimum field. These transfer efficiencies are then fed into classical trajectory simulations comparing alternating-gradient (AG), alternating-states (AS), and alternating-states-with-potential-modulation (ASMP) deceleration schemes. The paper claims that AS/ASMP capture 2-3 times more molecules and require roughly half the number of stages compared with standard AG deceleration, concluding that the proposed state-switching protocol substantially improves Stark deceleration performance.

Significance. If the high transfer fidelity holds throughout the three-dimensional acceptance volume and at realistic operating fields, this would be a meaningful practical advance for cold-molecule science: larger phase-space acceptance and a halving of the required electrode stages are both important for decelerating heavy or weakly polar molecules. The quantum-chemistry machinery is a clear strength: the paper uses a spectroscopically refined potential energy surface, an ab initio dipole surface, and a direct numerical solution of the TDSE rather than a fit to the desired outcome. The classical trajectory comparison is transparent and applies the same equations to all three schemes. The principal weakness is the mismatch between the quantum transfer calculation, which is only demonstrated along the decelerator axis and at zero minimum field, and the trajectory model, which assumes perfect state switching for every molecule in the full 3D acceptance volume at every event. That mismatch is load-bearing for the central quantitative claims.

major comments (4)

[Sec. II, Fig. 3; Sec. III, Eq. (4), Table I] The quantum transfer efficiency is computed only for positions along the longitudinal z-axis and with Vmin=0, whereas the trajectory model in Eq. (4) assumes W(t)=±1 for every molecule in the three-dimensional acceptance volume at every switching event. The manuscript itself states that the actual decelerator never goes below 300 V/cm to avoid Majorana losses. Off-axis molecules experience different dc field magnitudes and, crucially, different field directions relative to the fixed pump polarization, which changes both the Stark-shift chirp and the transition-dipole projection (Rabi frequency). The adiabatic condition can therefore fail in parts of the acceptance volume, and no loss or inefficiency term appears in Eq. (4). The acceptance gains in Table I and Fig. 4 therefore implicitly assume that 99.8% transfer holds uniformly in space and at the experimental minimum field. Please provide transfer-efficiency maps over the full (x,y,z) acceptance volume for the relevant Vmin values, and incorporate any spatial/efficiency degradation into the trajectory model.
[Sec. III, Eq. (4)] Equation (4) is dimensionally inconsistent as written. The trajectory vector r is defined to contain the transverse Cartesian coordinates x,y and a longitudinal phase angle phi; multiplying the entire acceleration vector by mL/pi gives expressions with different units for the transverse and longitudinal components (mL/pi times x-double-dot is an energy per length, while the force components on the right are forces). Since the transverse focusing/defocusing balance is central to the acceptance comparison between AG, AS, and ASMP, the equations of motion should be written separately for x,y and phi, or a consistent scaled-coordinate system should be defined.
[Sec. III, ASMP scheme] The ASMP scheme modifies the voltage waveform at each switching event, decreasing the voltage by 2 kV before the state switch and increasing it by 4 kV afterward, but the quantum transfer optimization in Sec. II is performed for the smooth voltage rise of Eq. (2) from Vmin=0 to Vmax. It is not shown that the proposed SCRAP protocol remains efficient under the ASMP voltage modulations. If ASMP is intended to use a different switching sequence, the fidelity of the state transfer under that sequence must be computed; otherwise the ASMP rows of Table I are not supported by the quantum simulations.
[Sec. III, state-switching losses] The manuscript estimates losses due to incomplete population inversion at about 0.4% per deceleration stage, citing Fig. 3. Even at that level, 30 stages would reduce the packet by roughly 11% (0.4% per stage) or 21% (0.4% per switch, with two switches per stage), yet Eq. (4) contains no such loss and the trajectory statistics in Table I are quoted without this correction. The density percentages are therefore upper bounds even under the on-axis, Vmin=0 transfer fidelity; the authors should state whether the 0.4% figure is per stage or per switch and include the accumulated loss in the reported acceptances.

minor comments (5)

[Sec. II, tmax definition] The text says 'For the present simulations we choose tmax = 130 ns' but later states 'At the terminal time tmax = 150 ns the dc electric field reaches its maximum and the SCRAP is finished.' Please reconcile these two values.
[Sec. II, Eq. (3)] The parameters 0.4 and 8 in the sigmoid envelope of Eq. (3) are not defined with units; please state explicitly that time is in nanoseconds or provide the dimensionful form.
[Sec. III, phase-angle extrema] The sentence 'The values of phi=n*pi and phi=n*pi/2 (n=0,1,2) correspond to the points of minimum and maximum of the electric field' is incomplete for phi in [0,2*pi]: the maxima occur at phi=pi/2 and phi=3*pi/2, so the list should be stated more precisely.
[Table I] The quantity labeled 'Molecular number densities (%mol)' is a fraction of the initial number of molecules in a specified final-velocity window, not a density; please use a more accurate term such as 'fractional transmission' or 'captured fraction'.
[Fig. 4 caption] The caption reads 'A 50 µ bin-size was used'; this should likely be '50 µs bin size'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the TDSE transfer efficiencies and the classical trajectory gains are independent calculations; the perfect-switching assumption is an unverified extrapolation, not a circular reduction.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained. The SCRAP transfer efficiency is obtained by direct numerical solution of the time-dependent Schrodinger equation using a spectroscopically refined potential energy surface and an ab initio dipole-moment surface, with matrix elements computed by independently validated tools (TROVE and RichMol). The voltage-rise parameter a is varied to map out the transfer efficiency, not fitted to the trajectory outcomes. The classical trajectory simulations then use Eq. (4) with W(t)=+-1, based on the stated assumption of virtually complete population inversion; the paper explicitly quotes a loss estimate of about 0.4% per stage. That assumption is extrapolated from on-axis simulations at Vmin=0 to the full three-dimensional acceptance at the experimental minimum field of 300 V/cm, so the predicted AS and ASMP gains may be optimistic, but this is an unsupported extrapolation and a correctness risk, not circularity: Eq. (4) is not equivalent by construction to the TDSE result, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. Self-citations to TROVE, RichMol, and the ammonia surfaces are references to independently validated software and data, and they do not carry the load of the central claim. Thus the paper contains no circular step and receives a score of 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central results rest on control parameters (voltage rise shape, ASMP modulation) and on prior quantum chemistry surfaces and basis-set completeness assumptions. No new physical entities are introduced. The trajectory results inherit the assumption of near-perfect switching; the quantum transfer itself is a direct TDSE solution, not fitted.

free parameters (2)

Voltage rise shape parameter a in Eq. (2) = 0.030 to 0.070 ns^-1
Scanned to maximize the population transfer efficiency across longitudinal positions; the claim of >99.5% transfer depends on choosing a in this range. It is a control parameter, not an experimentally determined constant.
ASMP potential modulation parameters = 2 kV decrease, 4 kV increase, delta=5 deg
Introduced ad hoc to improve the longitudinal acceptance of the ASMP scheme; the reported improvement of ASMP over AS at phi0=80 deg depends on these values.

assumptions (4)

domain assumption The spectroscopically refined PES (ref 45) and ab initio dipole moment surface (ref 46) accurately describe the rovibrational states and transition moments of NH3 relevant here.
The TDSE simulations assume these surfaces are accurate; the paper cites prior work but does not validate them in-paper.
domain assumption The variational rovibrational basis (J=0-10, vibrational bands below 4000 cm^-1) is sufficiently complete for the states involved in the transfer.
The paper states the basis size but does not provide convergence checks.
domain assumption The classical trajectory simulations with instantaneous, spatially uniform state switching (Eq. 4) correctly represent the decelerator dynamics.
The model assumes complete population inversion at the switching phase angles and ignores the finite voltage ramp duration and spatial variation of transfer efficiency.
standard math The adiabatic switching-off procedure used to project populations onto field-free states is valid.
Standard adiabatic theorem applied to extract state populations; no in-paper check of adiabaticity is shown.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Controlling rovibrational state populations of polar molecules in inhomogeneous electric fields of the Stark deceleration: molecular dynamics and quantum chemistry simulations." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/DLRU6NXS

@misc{pith2026250604798,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Controlling rovibrational state populations of polar molecules in inhomogeneous electric fields of the Stark deceleration: molecular dynamics and quantum chemistry simulations},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/DLRU6NXS}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.04798}
}

abstract

We propose a modified Stark-chirped rapid adiabatic passage technique for a robust rovibrational population transfer in the gas phase molecules in the presence of certain inhomogeneous electric fields. As an example application, the new state switching scheme is shown to greatly enhance the process of slowing polar ammonia molecules in the Stark decelerator. High-level quantum mechanical simulations show that a virtually complete population inversion between a selected pair of weak-field and strong-field seeking states of NH$_3$ can be achieved. Strong dc electric fields within the Stark decelerator are used as part of the rovibrational population transfer protocol. Classical-dynamics simulations for ammonia demonstrate notable improvements in the longitudinal phase space acceptance of the Stark decelerator upgraded with the state switching and an increased deceleration efficiency with respect to the standard Stark deceleration technique.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.04798 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** FIG. 2. Top: Temporal evolution of the dc (black) and the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** The Stark energies and gradients for the selected WFS and SFS states of ammonia, i.e., the inversion-split pair of |J, k, m⟩ = |1, 1, 1⟩ states, are obtained as described above, Sec. II. The position-dependent gradients ∇EWFS(⃗r) and ∇ESFS(⃗r) are calculated for the periodic electric field created by the Stark decelerator with the electrode configuration as described in Sec. II and the peak voltage is set to 10 kV.… view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (1 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4. Calculated time-of-flight profiles and phase-space distributions of NH [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

55 extracted references · 48 canonical work pages

[1]

W. E. Perreault, H. Zhou, N. Mukherjee, and R. N. Zare, Harnessing the power of adiabatic curve crossing to pop- ulate the highly vibrationally excited H2 (v=7,j=0) level, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 163202 (2020)

work page 2020
[2]

Oberst, H

M. Oberst, H. Münch, G. Grigoryan, and T. Halfmann, Stark-chirped rapid adiabatic passage among a three-state molecular system: Experimental and numerical investiga- tions, Phys. Rev. A78, 033409 (2008)

work page 2008
[3]

H. Li, E. Lötstedt, H. Li, Y. Zhou, N. Dong, L. Deng, P. Lu, T. Ando, A. Iwasaki, Y. Fu, S. Wang, J. Wu, K. Yamanouchi, and H. Xu, Giant enhancement of air lasing by complete population inversion in N+ 2 , Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 053201 (2020)

work page 2020
[4]

Møller, L

D. Møller, L. B. Madsen, and K. Mølmer, Quantum gates and multiparticle entanglement by rydberg excitation blockade and adiabatic passage, Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 170504 (2008)

work page 2008
[5]

Rickes, L

T. Rickes, L. P. Yatsenko, S. Steuerwald, T. Halfmann, B. W. Shore, N. V. Vitanov, and K. Bergmann, Efficient adiabatic population transfer by two-photon excitation assisted by a laser-induced stark shift, J. Chem. Phys. 113, 534 (2000)

work page 2000
[6]

A. A. Rangelov, N. V. Vitanov, L. P. Yatsenko, B. W. Shore, T. Halfmann, and K. Bergmann, Stark-shift- chirped rapid-adiabatic-passage technique among three states, Phys. Rev. A72, 053403 (2005)

work page 2005
[7]

H. L. Bethlem, G. Berden, and G. Meijer, Decelerat- ing neutral dipolar molecules, Phys. Rev. Lett.83, 1558 (1999)

1999
[8]

S. Y. T. van de Meerakker, H. L. Bethlem, and G. Meijer, Taming molecular beams, Nat. Phys.4, 595 (2008)

work page 2008

Show all 55 references

[9]

S. A. Meek, H. L. Bethlem, H. Conrad, and M. G., Trap- ping molecules on a chip in travelling potential wells, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 153003 (2008), arXiv:0801.2943 [physics]

2008 arXiv
[10]

M. T. Bell and T. P. Softley, Ultracold molecules and ultracold chemistry, Mol. Phys.107, 99 (2009)

2009
[11]

S. D. Hogan, C. Seiler, and F. Merkt, Rydberg-state- enabled deceleration and trapping of cold molecules, Phys. 8 Rev. Lett. 103, 123001 (2009)

2009
[12]

S. Y. T. van de Meerakker, H. L. Bethlem, N. Vanhaecke, and G. Meijer, Manipulation and control of molecular beams, Chem. Rev.112, 4828 (2012)

2012
[13]

van Veldhoven, J

J. van Veldhoven, J. Küpper, H. L. Bethlem, B. Sartakov, A. J. A. van Roij, and G. Meijer, Decelerated molecular beams for high-resolution spectroscopy: The hyperfine structure of 15ND3, Eur. Phys. J. D31, 337 (2004)

2004
[14]

R. V. Krems, Molecules near absolute zero and external field control of atomic and molecular dynamics, Int. Rev. Phys. Chem. 24, 99 (2005)

2005
[15]

J. J. Gilijamse, S. Hoekstra, S. Y. T. van de Meerakker, G. C. Groenenboom, and G. Meijer, Near-threshold in- elastic collisions using molecular beams with a tunable velocity, Science313, 1617 (2006)

2006
[16]

E. R. Hudson, H. J. Lewandowski, B. C. Sawyer, and J. Ye, Cold molecule spectroscopy for constraining the evolution of the fine structure constant, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 143004 (2006)

2006
[17]

Schnell and J

M. Schnell and J. Küpper, Tailored molecular samples for precision spectroscopy experiments, Faraday Disc.150, 33 (2011)

2011
[18]

B. K. Stuhl, M. T. Hummon, and J. Ye, Cold state- selected molecular collisions and reactions, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 65, 501 (2014)

2014
[19]

M. L. Wall, K. Maeda, and L. D. Carr, Realizing un- conventional quantum magnetism with symmetric top molecules, New J. Phys.17, 025001 (2015)

2015
[20]

S. N. Vogels, J. Onvlee, S. Chefdeville, A. van der Avoird, G. C. Groenenboom, and S. Y. T. Meerakker, Imaging resonancesinlow-energyno-heinelasticcollisions.,Science 350, 787 (2015), arXiv:1510.00299 [physics]

2015 arXiv
[21]

Auerbach, E

D. Auerbach, E. E. A. Bromberg, and L. Wharton, Alternate-gradient focusing of molecular beams, J. Chem. Phys. 45, 2160 (1966)

1966
[22]

H. L. Bethlem, A. J. A. van Roij, R. T. Jongma, and G. Meijer, Alternate gradient focusing and deceleration of a molecular beam, Phys. Rev. Lett.88, 133003 (2002)

2002
[23]

M. R. Tarbutt, H. L. Bethlem, J. J. Hudson, V. L. Ryabov, V. A. Ryzhov, B. E. Sauer, G. Meijer, and E. A. Hinds, Slowing heavy, ground-state molecules using an alternat- ing gradient decelerator, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 173002 (2004)

2004
[24]

H. L. Bethlem, M. R. Tarbutt, J. Küpper, D. Carty, K. Wohlfart, E. A. Hinds, and G. Meijer, Alternating gradient focusing and deceleration of polar molecules, J. Phys. B 39, R263 (2006), arXiv:0604020 [physics]

2006
[25]

Wohlfart, F

K. Wohlfart, F. Grätz, F. Filsinger, H. Haak, G. Meijer, and J. Küpper, Alternating-gradient focusing and decel- eration of large molecules, Phys. Rev. A77, 031404(R) (2008), arXiv:0803.0650 [physics]

2008 arXiv
[26]

K.Wohlfart, F.Filsinger, F.Grätz, J.Küpper,andG.Mei- jer, Stark deceleration of OH radicals in low-field-seeking and high-field-seeking quantum states, Phys. Rev. A78, 033421 (2008)

2008
[27]

Filsinger, U

F. Filsinger, U. Erlekam, G. von Helden, J. Küpper, and G. Meijer, Selector for structural isomers of neu- tral molecules, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 133003 (2008), arXiv:0802.2795 [physics]

2008 arXiv
[28]

Chang, D

Y.-P. Chang, D. A. Horke, S. Trippel, and J. Küp- per, Spatially-controlled complex molecules and their applications, Int. Rev. Phys. Chem. 34, 557 (2015), arXiv:1505.05632 [physics]

2015 arXiv
[29]

E. R. Hudson, Deceleration of continuous molecular beams, Phys. Rev. A79, 061407 (2009)

2009
[30]

Zeppenfeld, B

M. Zeppenfeld, B. G. U. Englert, R. Glöckner, A. Prehn, M. Mielenz, C. Sommer, L. D. van Buuren, M. Motsch, and G. Rempe, Sisyphus cooling of electrically trapped polyatomic molecules, Nature491, 570 (2012), arXiv:1208.0046 [physics]

2012 arXiv
[31]

Prehn, M

A. Prehn, M. Ibrügger, R. Glöckner, G. Rempe, and M. Zeppenfeld, Optoelectrical cooling of polar molecules to submillikelvin temperatures, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 063005 (2016), arXiv:1511.09427 [physics]

2016 arXiv
[32]

Mukherjee, A

A. Mukherjee, A. Widhalm, D. Siebert, S. Krehs, N. Sharma, A. Thiede, D. Reuter, J. Förstner, and A. Zrenner, Electrically controlled rapid adiabatic passage in a single quantum dot, Applied Physics Letters116, 251103 (2020)

2020
[33]

N. R. Hutzler, H.-I. Lu, and J. M. Doyle, The buffer gas beam: An intense, cold, and slow source for atoms and molecules, Chem. Rev.112, 4803 (2012), arXiv:1111.2841 [physics]

2012 arXiv
[34]

Singh, A

V. Singh, A. K. Samanta, N. Roth, D. Gusa, T. Ossen- brüggen, I. Rubinsky, D. A. Horke, and J. Küpper, Opti- mized cell geometry for buffer-gas-cooled molecular-beam sources,Phys.Rev.A 97,032704(2018),arXiv:1801.10586 [physics]

2018 arXiv
[35]

Barry, E

J. Barry, E. Shuman, E. Norrgard, and D. DeMille, Laser radiation pressure slowing of a molecular beam, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 103002 (2012), arXiv:1110.4890 [physics]

2012 arXiv
[36]

Truppe, H

S. Truppe, H. J. Williams, N. J. Fitch, M. Hambach, T. E. Wall, E. A. Hinds, B. E. Sauer, and M. R. Tarbutt, An intense, cold, velocity-controlled molecular beam by frequency-chirped laser slowing, New J. Phys.19, 022001 (2017), arXiv:1605.06055 [physics]

2017 arXiv
[37]

Comparat, Molecular cooling via sisyphus pro- cesses, Phys

D. Comparat, Molecular cooling via sisyphus pro- cesses, Phys. Rev. A89, 043410 (2014), arXiv:1404.2689 [physics]

2014 arXiv
[38]

J. Lim, M. D. Frye, J. M. Hutson, and M. R. Tarbutt, Modeling sympathetic cooling of molecules by ultracold atoms, Phys. Rev. A92, 053419 (2015), arXiv:1508.03987 [physics]

2015 arXiv
[39]

B. K. Stuhl, M. T. Hummon, M. Yeo, G. Quéméner, J. L. Bohn, and J. Ye, Evaporative cooling of the dipolar hydroxyl radical, Nature492, 396 (2012), arXiv:1209.6343 [physics]

2012 arXiv
[40]

K.-K. Ni, S. Ospelkaus, M. H. G. de Miranda, A. Pe’er, B. Neyenhuis, J. J. Zirbel, S. Kotochigova, P. S. Julienne, D. Jin, and J. Ye, A high phase-space-density gas of polar molecules, Science 322, 231 (2008)

2008
[41]

Pérez-Ríos, M

J. Pérez-Ríos, M. Lepers, and O. Dulieu, Theory of long- range ultracold atom-molecule photoassociation, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 073201 (2015), arXiv:1505.03288 [physics]

2015 arXiv
[42]

Cheng, A

C. Cheng, A. P. P. van der Poel, P. Jansen, M. Quintero- Pérez, T. E. Wall, W. Ubachs, and H. L. Bethlem, Molecular fountain, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 253201 (2016), arXiv:1611.03640 [physics]

2016 arXiv
[43]

5.5.http://www.comsol.com

COMSOL Multiphysics v. 5.5.http://www.comsol.com. COMSOL AB, Stockholm, Sweden
[44]

H. L. Bethlem, F. M. H. Crompvoets, R. T. Jongma, S. Y. T. van de Meerakker, and G. Meijer, Deceleration and trapping of ammonia using time-varying electric fields, Phys. Rev. A65, 053416 (2002)

2002
[45]

S. N. Yurchenko, R. J. Barber, and J. Tennyson, A vari- ationally computed line list for hot NH3, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 413, 1828 (2011), arXiv:1011.1569 [astro-ph]. 9

2011 arXiv
[46]

S. N. Yurchenko, R. J. Barber, A. Yachmenev, W. Thiel, P. Jensen, and J. Tennyson, A variationally computed T = 300 K line list for NH3, J. Phys. Chem. A113, 11845 (2009)

2009
[47]

S. N. Yurchenko, W. Thiel, and P. Jensen, Theoretical ROVibrational energies (TROVE): A robust numerical approach to the calculation of rovibrational energies for polyatomic molecules, J. Mol. Spectrosc.245, 126 (2007)

2007
[48]

Yachmenev and S

A. Yachmenev and S. N. Yurchenko, Automatic differenti- ation method for numerical construction of the rotational- vibrational Hamiltonian as a power series in the curvilin- ear internal coordinates using the Eckart frame, J. Chem. Phys. 143, 014105 (2015)

2015
[49]

S. N. Yurchenko, A. Yachmenev, and R. I. Ovsyan- nikov, Symmetry adapted ro-vibrational basis functions for variational nuclear motion calculations: TROVE approach, J. Chem. Theory Comput.13, 4368 (2017), arXiv:1708.07185 [physics]

2017 arXiv
[50]

Owens and A

A. Owens and A. Yachmenev, RichMol: A general vari- ational approach for rovibrational molecular dynamics in external electric fields, J. Chem. Phys.148, 124102 (2018), arXiv:1802.07603 [physics]

2018 arXiv
[51]

Scoles, ed.,Atomic and molecular beam methods, Vol

G. Scoles, ed.,Atomic and molecular beam methods, Vol. 1 (Oxford University Press, New York, NY, USA, 1988)

1988
[52]

Christen, K

W. Christen, K. Rademann, and U. Even, Supersonic beams at high particle densities: Model description be- yond the ideal gas approximation, J. Phys. Chem. A114, 11189 (2010)

2010
[53]

Schnell and G

M. Schnell and G. Meijer, Cold molecules: Preparation, applications, and challenges, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.48, 6010 (2009)

2009
[54]

Yachmenev and J

A. Yachmenev and J. Küpper, Communication: General variational approach to nuclear-quadrupole coupling in rovibrational spectra of polyatomic molecules, J. Chem. Phys. 147, 141101 (2017), arXiv:1709.08558 [physics]

2017 arXiv
[55]

Zhang, G

D. Zhang, G. Meijer, and N. Vanhaecke, Advanced switch- ing schemes in a Stark decelerator, Phys. Rev. A93, 023408 (2016), arXiv:1512.08361 [physics]

2016 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

W. E. Perreault, H. Zhou, N. Mukherjee, and R. N. Zare, Harnessing the power of adiabatic curve crossing to pop- ulate the highly vibrationally excited H2 (v=7,j=0) level, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 163202 (2020)

work page 2020

[2] [2]

Oberst, H

M. Oberst, H. Münch, G. Grigoryan, and T. Halfmann, Stark-chirped rapid adiabatic passage among a three-state molecular system: Experimental and numerical investiga- tions, Phys. Rev. A78, 033409 (2008)

work page 2008

[3] [3]

H. Li, E. Lötstedt, H. Li, Y. Zhou, N. Dong, L. Deng, P. Lu, T. Ando, A. Iwasaki, Y. Fu, S. Wang, J. Wu, K. Yamanouchi, and H. Xu, Giant enhancement of air lasing by complete population inversion in N+ 2 , Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 053201 (2020)

work page 2020

[4] [4]

Møller, L

D. Møller, L. B. Madsen, and K. Mølmer, Quantum gates and multiparticle entanglement by rydberg excitation blockade and adiabatic passage, Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 170504 (2008)

work page 2008

[5] [5]

Rickes, L

T. Rickes, L. P. Yatsenko, S. Steuerwald, T. Halfmann, B. W. Shore, N. V. Vitanov, and K. Bergmann, Efficient adiabatic population transfer by two-photon excitation assisted by a laser-induced stark shift, J. Chem. Phys. 113, 534 (2000)

work page 2000

[6] [6]

A. A. Rangelov, N. V. Vitanov, L. P. Yatsenko, B. W. Shore, T. Halfmann, and K. Bergmann, Stark-shift- chirped rapid-adiabatic-passage technique among three states, Phys. Rev. A72, 053403 (2005)

work page 2005

[7] [7]

H. L. Bethlem, G. Berden, and G. Meijer, Decelerat- ing neutral dipolar molecules, Phys. Rev. Lett.83, 1558 (1999)

1999

[8] [8]

S. Y. T. van de Meerakker, H. L. Bethlem, and G. Meijer, Taming molecular beams, Nat. Phys.4, 595 (2008)

work page 2008