Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 83 references

Consciousness via MIPT?

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper conjectures that the measurement-induced phase transition (MIPT) of monitored systems is the mechanism that forms concepts from raw qualia and drives the newborn-to-adult transition into a conscious state.

desk verdict An honest, explicitly labeled conjecture that maps MIPT onto concept formation and the newborn-adult transition; the mapping is the whole paper, and its quantum-to-classical bridge is asserted rather than built. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.04875 v1 pith:JQPDS3TM submitted 2025-06-05 q-bio.NC cond-mat.dis-nncond-mat.stat-mech

Alexander Gorsky This is my paper · ORCID
classification q-bio.NCcond-mat.dis-nncond-mat.stat-mech
keywords measurement-inducedphasetransitionconsciousnessqualiaconceptssemanticmemorylearnabilitynewborn-adultcognitivenetworks
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Physical theories of out-of-equilibrium systems describe a transition known as the measurement-induced phase transition (MIPT): a monitored system switches between an entangled phase, where information stays spread out, and a disentangled phase, where measurements can extract it. This paper conjectures that the same transition, read as a learnability transition, operates in the brain's mental space: the ensemble of raw subjective experiences (qualia) is the monitored system, recollection is the act of measurement, and clusters of related qualia form concepts. At a critical rate of recollection, a macroscopic number of concepts organize into semantic memory, and the paper identifies this reorganization with the newborn-to-adult transition into a conscious state. The claim matters because it converts the old idea that consciousness is a phase transition into a specific mechanism with a definite order parameter: the Shannon entropy of the measurement record. If true, it explains why individual experiences remain recallable in an adult: the adult mental target sits in the high-measurement, high-learnability phase.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the measurement-induced phase transition imported from monitored quantum circuits: unitary evolution competes with measurement-induced non-unitaries, and at a critical measurement rate the entanglement entropy crosses from volume-law growth to area-law saturation. The paper uses the two-parameter version of this transition, with measurement frequency and strength defining a phase plane in which an intermediate domain produces measurement-induced attraction and clusterization of the monitored constituents. The learnability interpretation of the same transition supplies the order parameter the paper adopts: the Shannon entropy of the measurement output. The new move is to set the monitored system to be the ensemble of qualia in mental space, to identify recollection as the measurement act, and to replace the quantum Hamiltonian by a large-N matrix problem on the cognitive network, with 1/N taking the role of Planck's constant.

What would settle it

Simulate or analyze a classical large-N ensemble of qualia-like states with a unitary-like mixing step and random projective recollection events, scanning measurement strength and frequency; if the Shannon entropy of the measurement record shows no threshold-like change and no attraction-induced clusterization appears in any part of the parameter plane, the paper's central conjecture is refuted. A complementary empirical check would look for a sharp crossover in infant recall fidelity as the rate of recollection rises, since the MIPT account requires such a crossover in learnability.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central claim is a proposed identification: the newborn-to-adult transition in the mental part of the target — semantic memory, monitored by an ensemble of functional networks — is a version of the measurement-induced phase transition. The probe is the physical brain, decomposed into an ensemble of interacting functional networks plus episodic memory; the target is the space of stimuli, whose mental component holds qualia at the bottom and concepts at higher levels. The unit measurement act is recollection of a quale, a backward-forward process that injects non-unitarity into the evolution of the qualia ensemble. Near the critical monitoring regime, measurement-induced attraction clusters qualia of similar context into a single concept, and beyond a critical measurement rate the whole ensemble crosses into a disentangled, learnable phase in which individual qualia can be recovered — the state of an adult with an organized cognitive network. The paper stresses that this is a conjecture and that no quantum mechanics is needed: the network structure supplies a large-N matrix problem in which 1/N plays the role of Planck's constant.

Load-bearing premise

The entire argument depends on the assumption that the measurement-induced phase transition, known to occur in genuinely quantum monitored circuits, still occurs when the system is a purely classical ensemble of qualia and the only bridge is the non-rigorous statement that 1/N plays the role of Planck's constant in the large-N matrix problem.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the newborn-to-adult transition is a version of MIPT, it is a broad extended crossover rather than a sharp threshold event: different concepts and links between them appear at different times, so the attributes of consciousness do not all switch on simultaneously.
  • The adult's ability to recall individual experiences places the adult mental target in the high-measurement, disentangled phase, where the learnability of the initial qualia is high and the measurement record carries the needed information.
  • Applying the same mechanism to the animal-to-human transition, with mutations as qualia and fitness estimation as measurement, predicts a very slow dynamical crossover toward human-like cognition.
  • The order parameter for the conscious-state transition is the Shannon entropy of the measurement output, namely the recall record, not the synchronization order parameter of the probe; probe synchronization is a related but distinct transition.
  • If no central monitoring agent is assumed, the MIPT account suggests a self-organized criticality principle: the brain adjusts measurement strength and intensity to keep the cognitive network near the critical regime, where learnability is optimal.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the 1/N-as-Planck-constant substitution is taken literally, a direct numerical test becomes available: a classical large-N ensemble of qualia-like states with random recall events should show attraction-induced clusterization and a threshold in the Shannon entropy of the record at intermediate measurement strength and frequency.
  • The recollection-as-measurement mapping suggests a behavioral control parameter the paper does not develop: the frequency of deliberate recall during infancy should shift the age at which stable concepts form, predicting that memory-intensive early environments accelerate the newborn-adult crossover.
  • Applied to sleep, the framework yields a testable corollary: if monitoring of the mental target continues during sleep at a different effective rate, the learnability of individual episodes should vary across sleep phases, linking the MIPT picture to memory consolidation research.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper argues that the measurement-induced phase transition (MIPT), known from monitored quantum circuits, can serve as a generative mechanism for the formation of concepts and semantic memory, and that the newborn-to-adult transition in consciousness can be identified with an MIPT in the 'mental part of the target.' The author introduces a probe-target dictionary: the probe is the ensemble of functional networks plus episodic memory; the target is the space of stimuli, whose mental component is the cognitive network of concepts. Recollection of a quale is proposed as the elementary measurement act; measurement-induced attraction clusters qualia into concepts, and the learnability aspect of MIPT accounts for the ability to recall individual qualia. The paper is explicitly conjectural: it reviews standard MIPT results, provides a toy measurement Hamiltonian from the literature, and ends with a list of open questions and research directions.

Significance. If the conjecture were supported, it would offer a novel mechanistic link between an established out-of-equilibrium phase transition and a long-standing question in consciousness research. The paper's useful features are its clear articulation of the analogy, its honest acknowledgment of limitations (e.g., 'we cannot suggest its precise realization' in Sec. 3.3), and its correct review of relevant MIPT results, including the learnability transition and the Shannon-entropy order parameter in the Appendix. However, in its current form the paper provides no derivation, simulation, or data; it maps known MIPT phenomenology onto cognition descriptively. The potential significance is therefore prospective rather than demonstrated.

major comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 3.3; Sec. 1, para. 4] The central conjecture lacks a concrete mathematical realization. MIPT is a property of a monitored system with a defined state space, unitary evolution, and measurement (Kraus) operators; Eqs. (5)-(6) in the Appendix make this explicit for a unitary circuit. The paper never specifies any of these ingredients for the ensemble of qualia, nor does it write down the large-N matrix model that would justify the claim that '1/N plays the role of the Planck constant.' The only concrete Hamiltonians are Eq. (12), imported from ref. [28] for a monitored quantum spin chain, and Eq. (13), an Ising-type probe model; neither is a model of the target's mental part. Thus the transfer of the MIPT phase structure to the cognitive network is an assertion, not a derivation.
  2. [Sec. 3.3] The paper reverses the standard MIPT protocol without justification. It states, 'we generate the system under consideration via measurements,' whereas in the monitored-circuit literature the system is first prepared in some state and then monitored. The existence and properties of a transition in a system whose very state is generated by the measurement process are not established by the cited literature and are not shown here. Because the newborn-adult transition is identified with this reversed scenario, this is a load-bearing gap.
  3. [Sec. 3.3 and Appendix, Eq. (12)] The mechanism for concept formation is the measurement-induced attraction reported in ref. [28], but that effect is demonstrated for the quantum Hamiltonian in Eq. (12) with on-site densities and projective/weak measurements. The paper gives no argument that the same attractive interaction survives when the 'system' is a classical or abstract ensemble of qualia and the 'measurement' is recollection. The author concedes in Sec. 3.3 that 'we cannot suggest its precise realization.' Since this attraction is the only proposed mechanism for turning qualia into concepts, the main constructive claim of the paper is unsupported.
  4. [Sec. 5; Sec. 3.3] No falsifiable prediction or observable order parameter is specified for the claimed newborn-adult transition. The Appendix correctly notes that the averaged free energy of the statistical ensemble equals the Shannon entropy of measurement outcomes (Eq. (11)), but the paper does not say what brain data correspond to this entropy, how the critical measurement rate would be identified, or what signature would distinguish the MIPT scenario from other criticality accounts. Without such specification, the conjecture cannot be tested or refined.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 4] The abbreviation 'FMRT' should be 'fMRI'.
  2. [Appendix, Eqs. (5)-(7)] The notation in Eqs. (5)-(7) is inconsistent: the subscript on K_{m_t}^t and p_{m_t} should be typeset as p_{m_t} and K_{m_t}^t, and the trace in Eq. (7) should read Tr(K_{m_t} rho K_{m_t}^dagger) = p_{m_t}(rho).
  3. [Sec. 3.1] The sentence 'If each site in the system involves q degrees of freedom Sn -> S0 for all values of n' is incomplete; the condition under which the Renyi entropy becomes n-independent is not stated.
  4. [Sec. 2.1] The phrase 'In cite [33]' should be 'In Ref. [33]', and the reference list contains at least one typo ('orch or' theory in [12]).

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central claim is an explicitly conjectural identification, not a derivation whose output equals its inputs.

full rationale

The paper does not fit parameters, rename an equation, or reduce a prediction to an input. It imports MIPT from monitored-circuit literature [18-28] and maps it onto cognition by stipulation: 'the measurement act is identified with the recalling of qualia' (Appendix) and 'we conjecture that MIPT is an important mechanism...' (Introduction). The only new formula, Eq. (13), is a toy probe Hamiltonian and is not used to derive the target-side transition. The paper explicitly concedes 'we cannot suggest its precise realization at the moment,' and the learnability interpretation is cited from [22-24] rather than derived here. Self-citations ([46], [64], [72]) appear in peripheral comparisons (Page-time order parameter for awakening, 7±2 percolation, Kuramoto information geometry) and are not load-bearing for the newborn-adult/MIPT claim. Remaining concerns are about the unsupported quantum-to-classical analogy and the lack of a concrete mathematical realization, which are assumption/correctness issues, not construction-level circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central conjecture rests on five explicit or implicit assumptions: the existence and nature of qualia, the MIPT-like dynamics of qualia, the transferability of measurement-induced attraction from quantum circuits to mental space, the 1/N substitution replacing quantum mechanics, and self-organized criticality in the brain. None of these assumptions has independent evidence in the paper, and the author acknowledges several as non-rigorous or without a precise realization.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Qualia exist as elements of a mental space with physical carriers in synaptic connections.
    Section 2.1 introduces qualia as raw subjective experiences that have physical carriers and are simultaneously elements of an abstract mental space; this is a background philosophical commitment, not an established empirical fact.
  • ad hoc to paper The ensemble of qualia evolves under MIPT-like dynamics: unitary evolution punctuated by nonunitary recollection events.
    Section 3.3 states that unsorted qualia 'correspond to the entangled phase' and that measurements, identified with recollection, introduce nonunitarities. This imports a quantum-circuit dynamical framework into a mental space without independent justification.
  • ad hoc to paper Measurement-induced attraction, demonstrated in quantum circuits (ref. [28]), transfers to qualia in the mental space.
    Section 3.3 relies on the clusterization effect from [28], which was derived for quantum spin chains with a measurement Hamiltonian, and assumes the same effect creates concepts from qualia, with no argument for the transfer.
  • ad hoc to paper '1/N plays the role of the Planck constant' in large-N matrix models, making classical networks equivalent to quantum circuits for this purpose.
    Section 1 states this substitution is 'non-rigorous' and uses it to claim that no quantum mechanics is needed. The entire MIPT framework, however, was developed for genuinely quantum systems, and this scaling argument is not demonstrated.
  • domain assumption The brain self-organizes to the critical measurement rate, i.e., self-organized MIPT.
    Section 3.3 suggests the brain adjusts measurement strength and intensity to keep cognitive networks near the MIPT regime, but the paper admits 'we cannot suggest its precise realization at the moment.'

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Consciousness via MIPT?." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/JQPDS3TM

@misc{pith2026250604875,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Consciousness via MIPT?},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/JQPDS3TM}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.04875}
}
read the original abstract

The measurement-induced phase transition (MIPT) is a recently formulated phenomenon in out-of-equilibrium systems. The competition between unitary evolutions and measurement-induced non-unitaries leads to the transition between the entangled and disentangled phases at some critical measurement rate. We conjecture that self-organized MIPT plays a key role in the generative model of cognitive networks and the formation of the state of consciousness in the "newborn-adult" transition. To this aim, we formulate the probe-target picture for the brain and suggest that MIPT interpreted as learnability transition takes place in the mental part of the target where the sites in the cognitive networks of semantic memory are concepts. Comparison with the synchronization phase transitions in the probe is made.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.04875 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the target-probe picture. The probe monitors the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Schematic representation of the MIPT as dynamical transition in some time [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Page curve for the entropy of time series of the brain activity(red) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: At the Page time the multiple "islands’-functional connectomes get consolidated [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

83 extracted references · 71 canonical work pages

  1. [28]

    Generalized quantum measurements with matrix product states: Entan- glement phase transition and clusterization.Physical Review Research, 4(2):023146, 2022

    Elmer VH Doggen, Yuval Gefen, Igor V Gornyi, Alexander D Mirlin, and Dmitry G Polyakov. Generalized quantum measurements with matrix product states: Entan- glement phase transition and clusterization.Physical Review Research, 4(2):023146, 2022

    work page 2022

  2. [1]

    Nonequilibrium physics of brain dynamics.arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.12188, 2025

    Ram´ on Nartallo-Kaluarachchi, Morten L Kringelbach, Gustavo Deco, Renaud Lam- biotte, and Alain Goriely. Nonequilibrium physics of brain dynamics.arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.12188, 2025

    arXiv 2025

  3. [2]

    Are biological systems poised at criticality?Jour- nal of Statistical Physics, 144:268–302, 2011

    Thierry Mora and William Bialek. Are biological systems poised at criticality?Jour- nal of Statistical Physics, 144:268–302, 2011

    2011

  4. [3]

    P. Bak. How Nature Works: The Science of Self-Organised Criticality. Copernicus Press, New York, 1996

    1996

  5. [4]

    Synchronization.Cam- bridge university press, 12, 2001

    Arkady Pikovsky, Michael Rosenblum, and J¨ urgen Kurths. Synchronization.Cam- bridge university press, 12, 2001

    2001

  6. [5]

    Rhythms of the brain, 2006

    Gy¨ orgy Buzsaki. Rhythms of the brain, 2006

    work page 2006

  7. [6]

    Colloquium: Criticality and dynamical scaling in living systems

    Miguel A Munoz. Colloquium: Criticality and dynamical scaling in living systems. Reviews of Modern Physics, 90(3):031001, 2018. 19

    work page 2018

  8. [7]

    Self-organized criticality in the brain

    Dietmar Plenz, Tiago L Ribeiro, Stephanie R Miller, Patrick A Kells, Ali Vakili, and Elliott L Capek. Self-organized criticality in the brain. Frontiers in Physics, 9:639389, 2021

    work page 2021

Show all 83 references
  1. [8]

    Consciousness as a state of matter

    Max Tegmark. Consciousness as a state of matter. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 76:238–270, 2015

    2015

  2. [9]

    Why do phase transitions matter in minds? Journal of Consciousness Studies, 25(1-2):131–150, 2018

    Robert Kozma and Joshua JJ Davis. Why do phase transitions matter in minds? Journal of Consciousness Studies, 25(1-2):131–150, 2018

    2018

  3. [10]

    Emergent complex neural dynamics.Nature physics, 6(10):744– 750, 2010

    Dante R Chialvo. Emergent complex neural dynamics.Nature physics, 6(10):744– 750, 2010

    2010

  4. [11]

    A framework for consciousness

    Francis Crick and Christof Koch. A framework for consciousness. Nature neuro- science, 6(2):119–126, 2003

    2003

  5. [12]

    Consciousness in the universe: A review of the ‘orch or’theory.Physics of life reviews, 11(1):39–78, 2014

    Stuart Hameroff and Roger Penrose. Consciousness in the universe: A review of the ‘orch or’theory.Physics of life reviews, 11(1):39–78, 2014

    2014

  6. [13]

    An information integration theory of consciousness

    Giulio Tononi. An information integration theory of consciousness. BMC neuro- science, 5(1):1–22, 2004

    2004

  7. [14]

    Consciousness: here, there and every- where? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 370(1668):20140167, 2015

    Giulio Tononi and Christof Koch. Consciousness: here, there and every- where? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 370(1668):20140167, 2015

    2015

  8. [15]

    Towards a cognitive neuroscience of con- sciousness: basic evidence and a workspace framework

    Stanislas Dehaene and Lionel Naccache. Towards a cognitive neuroscience of con- sciousness: basic evidence and a workspace framework. Cognition, 79(1-2):1–37, 2001

    2001

  9. [16]

    Theories of consciousness.Nature reviews neuroscience, 23(7):439–452, 2022

    Anil K Seth and Tim Bayne. Theories of consciousness.Nature reviews neuroscience, 23(7):439–452, 2022

    2022

  10. [17]

    Conscious- nessinthecradle: ontheemergenceofinfantexperience

    Tim Bayne, Joel Frohlich, Rhodri Cusack, Julia Moser, and Lorina Naci. Conscious- nessinthecradle: ontheemergenceofinfantexperience. Trends in cognitive sciences, 27(12):1135–1149, 2023

    2023

  11. [18]

    Quantum zeno effect and the many-body entanglement transition.Physical Review B, 98(20):205136, 2018

    Yaodong Li, Xiao Chen, and Matthew PA Fisher. Quantum zeno effect and the many-body entanglement transition.Physical Review B, 98(20):205136, 2018

    2018

  12. [19]

    Measurement-induced phase transitions in the dynamics of entanglement.Physical Review X, 9(3):031009, 2019

    Brian Skinner, Jonathan Ruhman, and Adam Nahum. Measurement-induced phase transitions in the dynamics of entanglement.Physical Review X, 9(3):031009, 2019

    2019

  13. [20]

    Unitary- projective entanglement dynamics.Physical Review B, 99(22):224307, 2019

    Amos Chan, Rahul M Nandkishore, Michael Pretko, and Graeme Smith. Unitary- projective entanglement dynamics.Physical Review B, 99(22):224307, 2019

    2019

  14. [21]

    Random quantum circuits.Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics, 14(1):335–379, 2023

    Matthew PA Fisher, Vedika Khemani, Adam Nahum, and Sagar Vijay. Random quantum circuits.Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics, 14(1):335–379, 2023

    2023

  15. [22]

    Potter, Sarang Gopalakrishnan, and Romain Vasseur

    Fergus Barratt, Utkarsh Agrawal, Andrew C. Potter, Sarang Gopalakrishnan, and Romain Vasseur. Transitions in the learnability of global charges from local mea- surements. Physical Review Letters, 129(20), November 2022. 20

    2022

  16. [23]

    Learnability transitions in monitored quantum dynamics via eavesdropper’s classical shadows.PRX, 5(2):020304, 2024

    Matteo Ippoliti and Vedika Khemani. Learnability transitions in monitored quantum dynamics via eavesdropper’s classical shadows.PRX, 5(2):020304, 2024

    2024

  17. [24]

    Observing quantum measurement collapse as a learnability phase transition

    Utkarsh Agrawal, Javier Lopez-Piqueres, Romain Vasseur, Sarang Gopalakrishnan, and Andrew C Potter. Observing quantum measurement collapse as a learnability phase transition. Physical Review X, 14(4):041012, 2024

    2024

  18. [25]

    Quantum error correc- tion in scrambling dynamics and measurement-induced phase transition.Phys

    Soonwon Choi, Yimu Bao, Xiao-Liang Qi, and Ehud Altman. Quantum error correc- tion in scrambling dynamics and measurement-induced phase transition.Phys. Rev. Lett., 125:030505, Jul 2020

    2020

  19. [26]

    Entangle- ment transition from variable-strength weak measurements

    Marcin Szyniszewski, Alessandro Romito, and Henning Schomerus. Entangle- ment transition from variable-strength weak measurements. Physical Review B, 100(6):064204, 2019

    2019

  20. [27]

    Universality of entanglement transitions from stroboscopic to continuous measurements.Physical review letters, 125(21):210602, 2020

    Marcin Szyniszewski, Alessandro Romito, and Henning Schomerus. Universality of entanglement transitions from stroboscopic to continuous measurements.Physical review letters, 125(21):210602, 2020

    2020

  21. [29]

    Dimensional reduction in quantum gravity

    Gerard’t Hooft. Dimensional reduction in quantum gravity. arXiv preprint gr- qc/9310026, 1993

    1993

  22. [30]

    The world as a hologram

    Leonard Susskind. The world as a hologram. Journal of Mathematical Physics, 36(11):6377–6396, 1995

    1995

  23. [31]

    Courier Corporation, 1956

    Clarence Irving Lewis.Mind and the world-order: Outline of a theory of knowledge. Courier Corporation, 1956

    1956

  24. [32]

    Concepts as elementary constituents of human consciousness.arXiv: 2208.09290, Jul-Oct 2022

    Boris Rusakov. Concepts as elementary constituents of human consciousness.arXiv: 2208.09290, Jul-Oct 2022

    2022 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Importance of quantum decoherence in brain processes

    Max Tegmark. Importance of quantum decoherence in brain processes. Physical Review E, 61(4):4194–4206, April 2000

    2000

  26. [34]

    The cognitome: Seeking the fundamental neuroscience of a theory of consciousness

    KV Anokhin. The cognitome: Seeking the fundamental neuroscience of a theory of consciousness. Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology, 51(7):915–937, 2021

    2021

  27. [35]

    Qualia as physical measurements: a mathematical model of qualia and pure concepts.arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.10602, 2022

    Pedro Resende. Qualia as physical measurements: a mathematical model of qualia and pure concepts.arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.10602, 2022

    2022

  28. [36]

    Networks of the Brain

    Olaf Sporns. Networks of the Brain. MIT press, 2016

    2016

  29. [37]

    The physics of brain network structure, function and control.Nature Reviews Physics, 1(5):318–332, 2019

    Christopher W Lynn and Danielle S Bassett. The physics of brain network structure, function and control.Nature Reviews Physics, 1(5):318–332, 2019

    2019

  30. [38]

    Place cells, grid cells, and the brain’s spatial representation system.Annu

    Edvard I Moser, Emilio Kropff, and May-Britt Moser. Place cells, grid cells, and the brain’s spatial representation system.Annu. Rev. Neurosci., 31(1):69–89, 2008. 21

    2008

  31. [39]

    On the biological plausibility of grandmother cells: implications for neural network theories in psychology and neuroscience

    Jeffrey S Bowers. On the biological plausibility of grandmother cells: implications for neural network theories in psychology and neuroscience. Psychological review, 116(1):220, 2009

    2009

  32. [40]

    Lack of context modulation in human single neuron responses in the medial temporal lobe.Cell Reports, 44(1), 2025

    Hernan G Rey, Theofanis I Panagiotaropoulos, Lorenzo Gutierrez, Fernando J Chaure, Alejandro Nasimbera, Santiago Cordisco, Fabian Nishida, Antonio Valentin, Gonzalo Alarcon, Mark P Richardson, et al. Lack of context modulation in human single neuron responses in the medial tem...

    2025

  33. [41]

    Mathematical philosophy of consciousness.Journal of Consciousness Exploration and Research, 15(2):179–189, 2024

    Boris Rusakov. Mathematical philosophy of consciousness.Journal of Consciousness Exploration and Research, 15(2):179–189, 2024

    2024

  34. [42]

    Saumier and H Chertkow

    D. Saumier and H Chertkow. Sematic memory.Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep, 2(20), November 2002

    2002

  35. [43]

    Pr´ ecis of elements of episodic memory.Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 7(2):223–238, 1984

    Endel Tulving. Pr´ ecis of elements of episodic memory.Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 7(2):223–238, 1984

    1984

  36. [44]

    Space and time in the brain.Science, 358(6362):482–485, 2017

    Gy¨ orgy Buzs´ aki and Rodolfo Llin´ as. Space and time in the brain.Science, 358(6362):482–485, 2017

    2017

  37. [45]

    Are grid cells used for navigation? on local metrics, subjective spaces, and black holes

    GilyGinosar, JohnatanAljadeff, LioraLas, DoriDerdikman, andNachumUlanovsky. Are grid cells used for navigation? on local metrics, subjective spaces, and black holes. Neuron, 111(12):1858–1875, 2023

    2023

  38. [46]

    Page time and the order parameter for a consciousness state

    Alexander Gorsky. Page time and the order parameter for a consciousness state. arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.10602, 2022

    2022 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Spectral peculiarityandcriticalityofahumanconnectome

    NikitaPospelov, SNechaev, KAnokhin, OValba, VAvetisov, andAGorsky. Spectral peculiarityandcriticalityofahumanconnectome. Physics of life reviews, 31:240–256, 2019

    2019

  40. [48]

    Metric structural human connectomes: localization and multifractality of eigen- modes

    Anna Bobyleva, Alexander Gorsky, Sergei Nechaev, Olga Valba, and Nikita Pospelov. Metric structural human connectomes: localization and multifractality of eigen- modes. Network Neuroscience, 9(2):682–711, 2025

    2025

  41. [49]

    Dynamical purification phase transition in- duced by quantum measurements.Physical Review X, 10(4):041020, 2020

    Michael J Gullans and David A Huse. Dynamical purification phase transition in- duced by quantum measurements.Physical Review X, 10(4):041020, 2020

    2020

  42. [50]

    Quantum error cor- rection in scrambling dynamics and measurement-induced phase transition.Physical Review Letters, 125(3):030505, 2020

    Soonwon Choi, Yimu Bao, Xiao-Liang Qi, and Ehud Altman. Quantum error cor- rection in scrambling dynamics and measurement-induced phase transition.Physical Review Letters, 125(3):030505, 2020

    2020

  43. [51]

    Self-organized error correction in random unitary circuits with measurement.Physical Review B, 103(17):174309, 2021

    Ruihua Fan, Sagar Vijay, Ashvin Vishwanath, and Yi-Zhuang You. Self-organized error correction in random unitary circuits with measurement.Physical Review B, 103(17):174309, 2021

    2021

  44. [52]

    Entanglement membrane in chaotic many-body systems

    Tianci Zhou and Adam Nahum. Entanglement membrane in chaotic many-body systems. Physical Review X, 10(3):031066, 2020. 22

    2020

  45. [53]

    Measurement-induced criticality in random quantum circuits

    Chao-Ming Jian, Yi-Zhuang You, Romain Vasseur, and Andreas WW Ludwig. Measurement-induced criticality in random quantum circuits. Physical Review B, 101(10):104302, 2020

    2020

  46. [54]

    Theory of the phase transition in random unitary circuits with measurements

    Yimu Bao, Soonwon Choi, and Ehud Altman. Theory of the phase transition in random unitary circuits with measurements. Physical Review B, 101(10):104301, 2020

    2020

  47. [55]

    Dynamical quantum phase transitions: a review.Reports on Progress in Physics, 81(5):054001, 2018

    Markus Heyl. Dynamical quantum phase transitions: a review.Reports on Progress in Physics, 81(5):054001, 2018

    2018

  48. [56]

    Dynamical quantum phase transitions

    AA Zvyagin. Dynamical quantum phase transitions. Low Temperature Physics, 42(11):971–994, 2016

    2016

  49. [57]

    Malte P¨ utz, Romain Vasseur, Andreas W. W. Ludwig, Simon Trebst, and Guo-Yi Zhu. Flow to nishimori universality in weakly monitored quantum circuits with qubit loss, 2025

    2025

  50. [58]

    Operator scaling dimensions and multifractality at measurement-induced transitions.Physical review letters, 128(5):050602, 2022

    Aidan Zabalo, Michael J Gullans, Justin H Wilson, Romain Vasseur, Andreas WW Ludwig, Sarang Gopalakrishnan, David A Huse, and JH Pixley. Operator scaling dimensions and multifractality at measurement-induced transitions.Physical review letters, 128(5):050602, 2022

    2022

  51. [59]

    The free-energy principle: a unified brain theory? Nature reviews neuroscience, 11(2):127–138, 2010

    Karl Friston. The free-energy principle: a unified brain theory? Nature reviews neuroscience, 11(2):127–138, 2010

    2010

  52. [60]

    Lancelot Da Costa, Lars Sandved-Smith, Karl Friston, Maxwell J. D. Ramstead, and Anil K. Seth. A mathematical perspective on neurophenomenology, 2024

    2024

  53. [61]

    Whyte, Andrew W

    Christopher J. Whyte, Andrew W. Corcoran, Jonathan Robinson, Ryan Smith, Ros- alyn J. Moran, Thomas Parr, Karl J. Friston, Anil K. Seth, and Jakob Hohwy. On the minimal theory of consciousness implicit in active inference, 2024

    2024

  54. [62]

    Cognitive network science: A review of research on cognition through the lens of network representations, processes, and dynamics.Complexity, 2019(1):2108423, 2019

    Cynthia SQ Siew, Dirk U Wulff, Nicole M Beckage, and Yoed N Kenett. Cognitive network science: A review of research on cognition through the lens of network representations, processes, and dynamics.Complexity, 2019(1):2108423, 2019

    2019

  55. [63]

    Cognitive network science for understanding online social cognitions: A brief review.Topics in Cognitive Science, 14(1):143–162, 2022

    Massimo Stella. Cognitive network science for understanding online social cognitions: A brief review.Topics in Cognitive Science, 14(1):143–162, 2022

    2022

  56. [64]

    K-clique percolation in free association networks and the possible mechanism behind the 7± 2 law.Scientific Reports, 12:5540, 2022

    Olga Valba and Alexander Gorsky. K-clique percolation in free association networks and the possible mechanism behind the 7± 2 law.Scientific Reports, 12:5540, 2022

    2022

  57. [65]

    Dynamical origin of the effective storage capacity in the brain’s working memory.Phys

    Christian Bick and Mikhail Rabinovich. Dynamical origin of the effective storage capacity in the brain’s working memory.Phys. Rev. Letters, 103(21):218101(1–4), 2009

    2009

  58. [66]

    Measuring information integration

    Giulio Tononi and Olaf Sporns. Measuring information integration. BMC neuro- science, 4(1):1–20, 2003. 23

    2003

  59. [67]

    Information integration in large brain net- works

    Daniel Toker and Friedrich T Sommer. Information integration in large brain net- works. PLoS computational biology, 15(2):e1006807, 2019

    2019

  60. [68]

    Average entropy of a subsystem.Physical review letters, 71(9):1291, 1993

    Don N Page. Average entropy of a subsystem.Physical review letters, 71(9):1291, 1993

    1993

  61. [69]

    Information in black hole radiation.Physical review letters, 71(23):3743, 1993

    Don N Page. Information in black hole radiation.Physical review letters, 71(23):3743, 1993

    1993

  62. [70]

    Information geometry and its applications, volume 194

    Shun-ichi Amari. Information geometry and its applications, volume 194. Springer, 2016

    2016

  63. [71]

    Classifying and measuring geometry of a quantum ground state manifold

    Michael Kolodrubetz, Vladimir Gritsev, and Anatoli Polkovnikov. Classifying and measuring geometry of a quantum ground state manifold. Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics, 88(6):064304, 2013

    2013

  64. [72]

    Informationgeometryandsynchronization phase transition in the kuramoto model.Physical Review E, 107(4):044211, 2023

    ArtemAlexandrovandAlexanderGorsky. Informationgeometryandsynchronization phase transition in the kuramoto model.Physical Review E, 107(4):044211, 2023

    2023

  65. [73]

    Network renormalization

    Andrea Gabrielli, Diego Garlaschelli, Subodh P Patil, and M Serrano. Network renormalization. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.12988, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  66. [74]

    Timelike entanglement entropy.Journal of High Energy Physics, 2023(5):1–62, 2023

    Jonathan Harper, Ali Mollabashi, Tadashi Takayanagi, Yusuke Taki, et al. Timelike entanglement entropy.Journal of High Energy Physics, 2023(5):1–62, 2023

    2023

  67. [75]

    Temporal entanglement in chaotic quantum circuits.Physical Review X, 13(4):041008, 2023

    Alessandro Foligno, Tianci Zhou, and Bruno Bertini. Temporal entanglement in chaotic quantum circuits.Physical Review X, 13(4):041008, 2023

    2023

  68. [76]

    Observable and computable entanglement in time, 2025

    Alexey Milekhin, Zofia Adamska, and John Preskill. Observable and computable entanglement in time, 2025

    2025

  69. [77]

    Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities.Proceedings of the national academy of sciences, 79(8):2554– 2558, 1982

    John J Hopfield. Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities.Proceedings of the national academy of sciences, 79(8):2554– 2558, 1982

    1982

  70. [78]

    Learning patterns and pattern sequences by self-organizing nets of thresh- old elements

    S-I Amari. Learning patterns and pattern sequences by self-organizing nets of thresh- old elements. IEEE Transactions on computers, 100(11):1197–1206, 1972

    1972

  71. [79]

    A new frontier for hopfield networks

    Dmitry Krotov. A new frontier for hopfield networks. Nature Reviews Physics, 5(7):366–367, 2023

    2023

  72. [80]

    Zaki, Luca Ambrogioni, and Dmitry Krotov

    Bao Pham, Gabriel Raya, Matteo Negri, Mohammed J. Zaki, Luca Ambrogioni, and Dmitry Krotov. Memorization to generalization: Emergence of diffusion models from associative memory, 2025

    2025

  73. [81]

    Conformal invariance and quantum nonlocality in critical hybrid circuits.Physical Review B, 104(10):104305, 2021

    Yaodong Li, Xiao Chen, Andreas WW Ludwig, and Matthew PA Fisher. Conformal invariance and quantum nonlocality in critical hybrid circuits.Physical Review B, 104(10):104305, 2021

    2021

  74. [82]

    Weak pairwise correlations imply strongly correlated network states in a neural population.Nature, 440(7087):1007–1012, 2006

    Elad Schneidman, Michael J Berry, Ronen Segev, and William Bialek. Weak pairwise correlations imply strongly correlated network states in a neural population.Nature, 440(7087):1007–1012, 2006. 24

    2006

  75. [83]

    Spin glass model of learning by selection.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 83(6):1695– 1698, 1986

    G´ erard Toulouse, Stanislas Dehaene, and Jean-Pierre Changeux. Spin glass model of learning by selection.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 83(6):1695– 1698, 1986. 25

    1986

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.