pith. sign in

arxiv: 2506.05201 · v2 · submitted 2025-06-05 · ✦ hep-ph

SUSY meets SMEFT: Complete one-loop matching of the general MSSM

Sabine Kraml , Andre Lessa , Suraj Prakash , Felix Wilsch This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 10:56 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph
keywords MSSMSMEFTone-loop matchingsupersymmetryeffective field theoryWilson coefficientsHiggs sectorR-parity
0
0 comments X p. Extension

The pith

The general MSSM matches onto the SMEFT at one loop with all supersymmetry-governed correlations among Wilson coefficients preserved.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper performs the complete one-loop matching of the most general Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model with conserved R-parity onto the Standard Model Effective Field Theory. The matching accounts for 124 free parameters and retains the full flavor structure by integrating out superpartners of non-degenerate masses at once. A sympathetic reader would care because the results supply the precise relations that supersymmetry imposes on the effective operators, which would enable systematic and global studies of supersymmetric models using effective field theory methods. The work also details the treatment of the Higgs sector and electroweak symmetry breaking while providing an alternative matching onto a two-Higgs-doublet model effective theory.

Core claim

The central claim is that the complete set of one-loop matching conditions from the MSSM to the SMEFT has been derived for the most general case, including all correlations among the SMEFT Wilson coefficients that are dictated by supersymmetry in the 124-parameter model with conserved R-parity.

What carries the argument

The one-loop matching procedure that integrates out all superpartners simultaneously while preserving the general flavor structure and reducing redundant operators to the Warsaw basis.

If this is right

  • All supersymmetry-induced correlations among SMEFT Wilson coefficients are now available and can be used directly in global fits.
  • The matching forms a basis for systematic and global studies of the full MSSM parameter space with effective field theory methods.
  • The detailed Higgs sector treatment ensures accurate electroweak symmetry breaking in the reduced effective Lagrangian.
  • The alternative matching to the two-Higgs-doublet-model EFT supplies relations for scenarios where the second Higgs doublet remains in the low-energy spectrum.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • These correlations could be applied to reinterpret existing experimental limits on SMEFT operators in terms of underlying supersymmetric parameters.
  • The method could be extended to derive similar matchings for other supersymmetric models or to include additional effects like R-parity violation.
  • The relations might simplify numerical scans over the MSSM parameter space by reducing the effective degrees of freedom at low energies.

Load-bearing premise

The integration of superpartners preserves the general flavor structure and the reduction of operators to the Warsaw basis introduces no uncontrolled errors in the Higgs sector treatment.

What would settle it

A direct one-loop calculation of the matching conditions for a chosen non-degenerate MSSM parameter point with specific superpartner masses would show a discrepancy in the predicted Wilson coefficient correlations if the claim is incorrect.

read the original abstract

We present the complete one-loop matching of the Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model (MSSM) onto the Standard Model Effective Field Theory (SMEFT), considering the most general case for the MSSM with conserved $R$-parity, which has 124 free parameters. The matching is performed with the Matchete package, which integrates out all superpartners at once with non-degenerate masses, while also retaining the most general flavor structure. Our results include all correlations among the different SMEFT Wilson coefficients that are governed by supersymmetry and thus provide a basis for future systematic and global studies of the MSSM parameter space employing EFT methods. A detailed discussion is provided on the treatment of the Higgs sector and electroweak symmetry breaking, along with the reduction of redundant operators in the EFT Lagrangian to the Warsaw basis. Furthermore, we validate against existing results in the literature and present a minimal phenomenological example. As an alternative low-energy scenario, we also provide the complete one-loop matching of the MSSM onto the two-Higgs-doublet-model EFT, where the second Higgs doublet is retained in the infrared spectrum. Extensive auxiliary material, including the code utilized for the matching, is available on GitHub.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims to deliver the complete one-loop matching of the general MSSM (124 parameters, R-parity conserved) onto SMEFT via the Matchete package, integrating out all superpartners simultaneously with non-degenerate masses and retaining general flavor structure. It supplies the full set of correlated Wilson coefficients, includes a detailed treatment of the Higgs sector and electroweak symmetry breaking, reduces redundant operators to the Warsaw basis, validates results against existing literature, presents a minimal phenomenological example, and additionally provides the matching onto the two-Higgs-doublet-model EFT. Public code and auxiliary material are made available on GitHub.

Significance. If the matching and reduction are free of artifacts, the result is significant because it supplies the complete set of SUSY-governed correlations among SMEFT Wilson coefficients for the most general MSSM. This directly enables systematic global EFT analyses of the MSSM parameter space. The automated implementation with public code, literature validation, and the alternative 2HDM-EFT matching are concrete strengths that enhance reproducibility and utility.

major comments (1)
  1. [Higgs sector treatment] Higgs sector and EWSB discussion: the manuscript states that a detailed treatment of the two-Higgs-doublet structure, vev alignment, and tadpole cancellation is provided, yet it should include explicit verification (e.g., a table of selected Warsaw-basis coefficients or a check of the effective Higgs potential) that the projection onto the single-Higgs SMEFT introduces no residual basis artifacts in operators such as Q_H or Q_HD. Without this concrete cross-check, the claim of completeness for the full 124-parameter case remains difficult to assess.
minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract and main text should explicitly state the number of independent operators retained after reduction to the Warsaw basis for the general-flavor case.
  2. Figure captions and table headings in the phenomenological example should clarify which MSSM parameters are varied and which SMEFT coefficients are shown.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of our work and the recommendation for minor revision. We address the major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Higgs sector treatment] Higgs sector and EWSB discussion: the manuscript states that a detailed treatment of the two-Higgs-doublet structure, vev alignment, and tadpole cancellation is provided, yet it should include explicit verification (e.g., a table of selected Warsaw-basis coefficients or a check of the effective Higgs potential) that the projection onto the single-Higgs SMEFT introduces no residual basis artifacts in operators such as Q_H or Q_HD. Without this concrete cross-check, the claim of completeness for the full 124-parameter case remains difficult to assess.

    Authors: We thank the referee for highlighting this point. While the manuscript already contains a detailed discussion of the two-Higgs-doublet structure, vev alignment, and tadpole cancellation, we agree that an explicit numerical cross-check would improve clarity and allow readers to more readily assess the absence of basis artifacts. In the revised manuscript we will add a table of selected Warsaw-basis coefficients (including those involving Q_H and Q_HD) obtained after the projection, together with a short verification that the effective Higgs potential is free of residual artifacts. This addition will be placed in the Higgs-sector section and will be supported by the existing Matchete output files already provided on GitHub. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Direct computational matching produces independent Wilson coefficients

full rationale

The paper's central result is the output of an automated one-loop integration performed by the Matchete package on the general 124-parameter MSSM, retaining full flavor structure and non-degenerate masses. Wilson coefficients and SUSY-induced correlations are generated by this external tool rather than being algebraically defined in terms of the input parameters or fitted to the same dataset. The discussion of Higgs-sector EWSB, vev alignment, and reduction to the Warsaw basis describes the computational pipeline and operator-basis choices but does not create a self-referential loop; the final coefficients remain the direct numerical/analytic output of the integration. Validation against existing literature supplies an external benchmark. No load-bearing self-citation, self-definitional relation, or fitted-input-renamed-as-prediction reduces the claimed matching to its own inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The claim rests on the domain assumption that the MSSM with conserved R-parity is parameterized by exactly 124 free parameters and that the Matchete package implements the correct one-loop matching rules for non-degenerate spectra.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The most general R-parity conserving MSSM has 124 free parameters.
    Stated directly in the abstract as the scope of the matching.
  • domain assumption Matchete correctly performs the one-loop integration of all superpartners while retaining general flavor structure.
    The central computational step relies on the correctness of this external tool.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5747 in / 1407 out tokens · 33955 ms · 2026-05-19T10:56:02.265623+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. When Two Loops Matter: Electroweak Precision in the SMEFT

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    A modification to the top-Higgs Yukawa coupling in SMEFT induces a two-loop shift in the W mass through a large anomalous dimension, providing a new indirect probe via electroweak precision observables.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

125 extracted references · 125 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 42 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Buchmuller and D

    W. Buchmuller and D. Wyler, Effective Lagrangian Analysis of New Interactions and Flavor Conservation, Nucl. Phys. B 268 (1986) 621

    work page 1986

  2. [2]

    Effective Theories and Measurements at Colliders

    C. Englert and M. Spannowsky ,Effective Theories and Measurements at Colliders, Phys. Lett. B 740 (2015) 8 [1408.5147]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  3. [3]

    The Standard Model as an Effective Field Theory

    I. Brivio and M. Trott, The Standard Model as an Effective Field Theory, Phys. Rept. 793 (2019) 1 [1706.08945]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  4. [4]

    Isidori, F

    G. Isidori, F. Wilsch and D. Wyler, The standard model effective field theory at work, Rev. Mod. Phys. 96 (2024) 015006 [2303.16922]. – 46 –

    work page arXiv 2024

  5. [5]

    Updated Global SMEFT Fit to Higgs, Diboson and Electroweak Data

    J. Ellis, C.W. Murphy , V. Sanz and T. You,Updated Global SMEFT Fit to Higgs, Diboson and Electroweak Data, JHEP 06 (2018) 146 [1803.03252]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  6. [6]

    Electroweak Sector Under Scrutiny: A Combined Analysis of LHC and Electroweak Precision Data

    E. da Silva Almeida, A. Alves, N. Rosa Agostinho, O.J.P. ´Eboli and M.C. Gonzalez-Garcia, Electroweak Sector Under Scrutiny: A Combined Analysis of LHC and Electroweak Precision Data, Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 033001 [1812.01009]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  7. [7]

    Ellis, M

    J. Ellis, M. Madigan, K. Mimasu, V. Sanz and T. You, Top, Higgs, Diboson and Electroweak Fit to the Standard Model Effective Field Theory, JHEP 04 (2021) 279 [2012.02779]

    work page arXiv 2021

  8. [8]

    Brivio, S

    I. Brivio, S. Bruggisser, E. Geoffray , W. Killian, M. Kr¨amer, M. Luchmann et al., From models to SMEFT and back?, SciPost Phys. 12 (2022) 036 [2108.01094]

    work page arXiv 2022

  9. [9]

    SMEF IT collaboration, Combined SMEFT interpretation of Higgs, diboson, and top quark data from the LHC, JHEP 11 (2021) 089 [2105.00006]

    work page arXiv 2021

  10. [10]

    Bruggisser, D

    S. Bruggisser, D. van Dyk and S. Westhoff, Resolving the flavor structure in the MFV-SMEFT, JHEP 02 (2023) 225 [2212.02532]

    work page arXiv 2023

  11. [11]

    Grunwald, G

    C. Grunwald, G. Hiller, K. Kr ¨oninger and L. Nollen, More synergies from beauty, top, Z and Drell-Yan measurements in SMEFT, JHEP 11 (2023) 110 [2304.12837]

    work page arXiv 2023

  12. [12]

    Allwicher, C

    L. Allwicher, C. Cornella, G. Isidori and B.A. Stefanek, New physics in the third generation. A comprehensive SMEFT analysis and future prospects, JHEP 03 (2024) 049 [2311.00020]

    work page arXiv 2024

  13. [13]

    Bartocci, A

    R. Bartocci, A. Biek ¨otter and T. Hurth, A global analysis of the SMEFT under the minimal MFV assumption, JHEP 05 (2024) 074 [2311.04963]

    work page arXiv 2024

  14. [14]

    Bartocci, A

    R. Bartocci, A. Biek ¨otter and T. Hurth, Renormalisation group evolution effects on global SMEFT analyses, 2412.09674

    work page arXiv

  15. [15]

    Alonso, E.E

    R. Alonso, E.E. Jenkins, A.V. Manohar and M. Trott, Renormalization Group Evolution of the Standard Model Dimension Six Operators III: Gauge Coupling Dependence and Phenomenology, JHEP 04 (2014) 159 [1312.2014]

    work page arXiv 2014

  16. [16]

    Thomsen, A Partially Fixed Background Field Gauge, JHEP 12 (2024) 185 [2404.11640]

    A.E. Thomsen, A Partially Fixed Background Field Gauge, JHEP 12 (2024) 185 [2404.11640]

    work page arXiv 2024

  17. [17]

    Cohen, X

    T. Cohen, X. Lu and Z. Zhang, STrEAMlining EFT Matching, SciPost Phys. 10 (2021) 098 [2012.07851]

    work page arXiv 2021

  18. [18]

    Fuentes-Martin, M

    J. Fuentes-Martin, M. K ¨onig, J. Pag`es, A.E. Thomsen and F. Wilsch, SuperTracer: A Calculator of Functional Supertraces for One-Loop EFT Matching, JHEP 04 (2021) 281 [2012.08506]

    work page arXiv 2021

  19. [19]

    MatchingTools: a Python library for symbolic effective field theory calculations

    J.C. Criado, MatchingTools: a Python library for symbolic effective field theory calculations, Comput. Phys. Commun. 227 (2018) 42 [1710.06445]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  20. [20]

    Fuentes-Mart´ ın, M

    J. Fuentes-Mart ´ın, M. K¨onig, J. Pag`es, A.E. Thomsen and F. Wilsch, A proof of concept for matchete: an automated tool for matching effective theories, Eur. Phys. J. C 83 (2023) 662 [2212.04510]

    work page arXiv 2023

  21. [21]

    Gaillard, The Effective One Loop Lagrangian With Derivative Couplings, Nucl

    M.K. Gaillard, The Effective One Loop Lagrangian With Derivative Couplings, Nucl. Phys. B 268 (1986) 669

    work page 1986

  22. [22]

    Chan, Derivative Expansion for the One Loop Effective Actions With Internal Symmetry, Phys

    L.-H. Chan, Derivative Expansion for the One Loop Effective Actions With Internal Symmetry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 57 (1986) 1199. – 47 –

    work page 1986

  23. [23]

    Cheyette, Effective Action for the Standard Model With Large Higgs Mass, Nucl

    O. Cheyette, Effective Action for the Standard Model With Large Higgs Mass, Nucl. Phys. B 297 (1988) 183

    work page 1988

  24. [24]

    Chan, Effective-Action Expansion in Perturbation Theory, Phys

    L.H. Chan, Effective-Action Expansion in Perturbation Theory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 54 (1985) 1222

    work page 1985

  25. [25]

    Fraser, Calculation of Higher Derivative Terms in the One Loop Effective Lagrangian, Z

    C.M. Fraser, Calculation of Higher Derivative Terms in the One Loop Effective Lagrangian, Z. Phys. C 28 (1985) 101

    work page 1985

  26. [26]

    Aitchison and C.M

    I.J.R. Aitchison and C.M. Fraser, Fermion Loop Contribution to Skyrmion Stability, Phys. Lett. B 146 (1984) 63

    work page 1984

  27. [27]

    Aitchison and C.M

    I.J.R. Aitchison and C.M. Fraser, Derivative Expansions of Fermion Determinants: Anomaly Induced Vertices, Goldstone-Wilczek Currents and Skyrme Terms, Phys. Rev. D 31 (1985) 2605

    work page 1985

  28. [28]

    Aitchison and C.M

    I.J.R. Aitchison and C.M. Fraser, Trouble With Boson Loops in Skyrmion Physics, Phys. Rev. D 32 (1985) 2190

    work page 1985

  29. [29]

    Cheyette, Derivative Expansion of the Effective Action, Phys

    O. Cheyette, Derivative Expansion of the Effective Action, Phys. Rev. Lett. 55 (1985) 2394

    work page 1985

  30. [30]

    Deriving Non-decoupling Effects of Heavy Fields from the Path Integral: a Heavy Higgs Field in an SU(2) Gauge Theory

    S. Dittmaier and C. Grosse-Knetter, Deriving nondecoupling effects of heavy fields from the path integral: A Heavy Higgs field in an SU(2) gauge theory, Phys. Rev. D 52 (1995) 7276 [hep-ph/9501285]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  31. [31]

    Integrating out the Standard Higgs Field in the Path Integral

    S. Dittmaier and C. Grosse-Knetter, Integrating out the standard Higgs field in the path integral, Nucl. Phys. B 459 (1996) 497 [hep-ph/9505266]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  32. [32]

    How to use the Standard Model effective field theory

    B. Henning, X. Lu and H. Murayama, How to use the Standard Model effective field theory, JHEP 01 (2016) 023 [1412.1837]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  33. [33]

    One-loop effective lagrangians after matching

    F. del Aguila, Z. Kunszt and J. Santiago, One-loop effective lagrangians after matching, Eur. Phys. J. C 76 (2016) 244 [1602.00126]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  34. [34]

    One-loop Matching and Running with Covariant Derivative Expansion

    B. Henning, X. Lu and H. Murayama, One-loop Matching and Running with Covariant Derivative Expansion, JHEP 01 (2018) 123 [1604.01019]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  35. [35]

    Integrating out heavy particles with functional methods: a simplified framework

    J. Fuentes-Martin, J. Portoles and P. Ruiz-Femenia, Integrating out heavy particles with functional methods: a simplified framework, JHEP 09 (2016) 156 [1607.02142]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  36. [36]

    Covariant diagrams for one-loop matching

    Z. Zhang, Covariant diagrams for one-loop matching, JHEP 05 (2017) 152 [1610.00710]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  37. [37]

    Cohen, X

    T. Cohen, X. Lu and Z. Zhang, Functional Prescription for EFT Matching, JHEP 02 (2021) 228 [2011.02484]

    work page arXiv 2021

  38. [38]

    Low energy behaviour of standard model extensions

    M. Boggia, R. Gomez-Ambrosio and G. Passarino, Low energy behaviour of standard model extensions, JHEP 05 (2016) 162 [1603.03660]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  39. [39]

    Dittmaier, S

    S. Dittmaier, S. Schuhmacher and M. Stahlhofen, Integrating out heavy fields in the path integral using the background-field method: general formalism, Eur. Phys. J. C 81 (2021) 826 [2102.12020]

    work page arXiv 2021

  40. [40]

    Carmona, A

    A. Carmona, A. Lazopoulos, P. Olgoso and J. Santiago, Matchmakereft: automated tree-level and one-loop matching, SciPost Phys. 12 (2022) 198 [2112.10787]

    work page arXiv 2022

  41. [41]

    CoDEx: Wilson coefficient calculator connecting SMEFT to UV theory

    S. Das Bakshi, J. Chakrabortty and S.K. Patra, CoDEx: Wilson coefficient calculator connecting SMEFT to UV theory, Eur. Phys. J. C 79 (2019) 21 [1808.04403]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  42. [42]

    The Universal One-Loop Effective Action

    A. Drozd, J. Ellis, J. Quevillon and T. You, The Universal One-Loop Effective Action, JHEP 03 (2016) 180 [1512.03003]. – 48 –

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  43. [43]

    Kr ¨amer, B

    M. Kr ¨amer, B. Summ and A. Voigt,Completing the scalar and fermionic Universal One-Loop Effective Action, JHEP 01 (2020) 079 [1908.04798]

    work page arXiv 2020

  44. [44]

    Standard Model EFT and Extended Scalar Sectors

    S. Dawson and C.W. Murphy ,Standard Model EFT and Extended Scalar Sectors, Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 015041 [1704.07851]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  45. [45]

    Haisch, M

    U. Haisch, M. Ruhdorfer, E. Salvioni, E. Venturini and A. Weiler,Singlet night in Feynman-ville: one-loop matching of a real scalar, JHEP 04 (2020) 164 [2003.05936]

    work page arXiv 2020

  46. [46]

    Gherardi, D

    V. Gherardi, D. Marzocca and E. Venturini, Matching scalar leptoquarks to the SMEFT at one loop, JHEP 07 (2020) 225 [2003.12525]

    work page arXiv 2020

  47. [47]

    Ellis, J

    S.A.R. Ellis, J. Quevillon, P.N.H. Vuong, T. You and Z. Zhang, The Fermionic Universal One-Loop Effective Action, JHEP 11 (2020) 078 [2006.16260]

    work page arXiv 2020

  48. [48]

    Angelescu and P

    A. Angelescu and P. Huang, Integrating Out New Fermions at One Loop, JHEP 01 (2021) 049 [2006.16532]

    work page arXiv 2021

  49. [49]

    Summ, One Formula To Match Them All: The Bispinor Universal One-Loop Effective Action, Ph.D

    B. Summ, One Formula To Match Them All: The Bispinor Universal One-Loop Effective Action, Ph.D. thesis, RWTH Aachen U., 2020. 2103.02487. 10.18154/RWTH-2021-00828

    work page doi:10.18154/rwth-2021-00828 2020

  50. [50]

    Zhang and S

    D. Zhang and S. Zhou, Complete one-loop matching of the type-I seesaw model onto the Standard Model effective field theory, JHEP 09 (2021) 163 [2107.12133]

    work page arXiv 2021

  51. [51]

    Dedes and K

    A. Dedes and K. Mantzaropoulos, Universal scalar leptoquark action for matching, JHEP 11 (2021) 166 [2108.10055]

    work page arXiv 2021

  52. [52]

    Du, X.-X

    Y. Du, X.-X. Li and J.-H. Yu, Neutrino seesaw models at one-loop matching: discrimination by effective operators, JHEP 09 (2022) 207 [2201.04646]

    work page arXiv 2022

  53. [53]

    X. Li, D. Zhang and S. Zhou, One-loop matching of the type-II seesaw model onto the Standard Model effective field theory, JHEP 04 (2022) 038 [2201.05082]

    work page arXiv 2022

  54. [54]

    Crivellin, M

    A. Crivellin, M. Kirk, T. Kitahara and F. Mescia, Large t→cZ as a sign of vectorlike quarks in light of the W mass, Phys. Rev. D 106 (2022) L031704 [2204.05962]

    work page arXiv 2022

  55. [55]

    Liao and X.-D

    Y. Liao and X.-D. Ma, One-loop matching of scotogenic model onto standard model effective field theory up to dimension 7, JHEP 12 (2022) 053 [2210.04270]

    work page arXiv 2022

  56. [56]

    Banerjee, J

    U. Banerjee, J. Chakrabortty , S.U. Rahaman and K. Ramkumar,One-loop effective action up to dimension eight: integrating out heavy scalar(s), Eur. Phys. J. Plus 139 (2024) 159 [2306.09103]

    work page arXiv 2024

  57. [57]

    Chakrabortty , S.U

    J. Chakrabortty , S.U. Rahaman and K. Ramkumar,One-loop effective action up to dimension eight: Integrating out heavy fermion(s), Nucl. Phys. B 1000 (2024) 116488 [2308.03849]

    work page arXiv 2024

  58. [58]

    ter Hoeve, G

    J. ter Hoeve, G. Magni, J. Rojo, A.N. Rossia and E. Vryonidou, The automation of SMEFT-assisted constraints on UV-complete models, JHEP 01 (2024) 179 [2309.04523]

    work page arXiv 2024

  59. [59]

    Li and S

    X. Li and S. Zhou, One-loop matching of the type-III seesaw model onto the Standard Model Effective Field Theory, JHEP 05 (2024) 169 [2309.14702]

    work page arXiv 2024

  60. [60]

    Das Bakshi, S

    S. Das Bakshi, S. Dawson, D. Fontes and S. Homiller, Relevance of one-loop SMEFT matching in the 2HDM, Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024) 075022 [2401.12279]

    work page arXiv 2024

  61. [61]

    Cepedello, F

    R. Cepedello, F. Esser, M. Hirsch and V. Sanz, Fermionic UV models for neutral triple gauge boson vertices, JHEP 07 (2024) 275 [2402.04306]. – 49 –

    work page arXiv 2024

  62. [62]

    Fuentes-Mart ´ın, G

    J. Fuentes-Mart ´ın, G. Isidori, M. K¨onig and N. Selimovi´c, Vector Leptoquarks Beyond Tree Level, Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 035024 [1910.13474]

    work page arXiv 2020

  63. [63]

    Fuentes-Mart ´ın, G

    J. Fuentes-Mart ´ın, G. Isidori, M. K¨onig and N. Selimovi´c, Vector Leptoquarks Beyond Tree Level II:O(αs) Corrections and Radial Modes, Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) 035021 [2006.16250]

    work page arXiv 2020

  64. [64]

    Fuentes-Mart ´ın, G

    J. Fuentes-Mart ´ın, G. Isidori, M. K¨onig and N. Selimovi´c, Vector Leptoquarks Beyond Tree Level III: Vector-like Fermions and Flavor-Changing Transitions, Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) 115015 [2009.11296]

    work page arXiv 2020

  65. [65]

    Dekens and P

    W. Dekens and P. Stoffer, Low-energy effective field theory below the electroweak scale: matching at one loop, JHEP 10 (2019) 197 [1908.05295]

    work page arXiv 2019

  66. [66]

    A Supersymmetry Primer

    S.P. Martin, A Supersymmetry primer, Adv. Ser. Direct. High Energy Phys.18 (1998) 1 [hep-ph/9709356]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  67. [67]

    Dimension-Six Terms in the Standard Model Lagrangian

    B. Grzadkowski, M. Iskrzynski, M. Misiak and J. Rosiek, Dimension-Six Terms in the Standard Model Lagrangian, JHEP 10 (2010) 085 [1008.4884]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  68. [68]

    Haag, J.T

    R. Haag, J.T. Lopuszanski and M. Sohnius, All Possible Generators of Supersymmetries of the S-Matrix, Nucl. Phys. B 88 (1975) 257

    work page 1975

  69. [69]

    Freedman, P

    D.Z. Freedman, P. van Nieuwenhuizen and S. Ferrara, Progress Toward a Theory of Supergravity, Phys. Rev. D 13 (1976) 3214

    work page 1976

  70. [70]

    Deser and B

    S. Deser and B. Zumino, Consistent Supergravity, Phys. Lett. B 62 (1976) 335

    work page 1976

  71. [71]

    Supersymmetric Unification Without Low Energy Supersymmetry And Signatures for Fine-Tuning at the LHC

    N. Arkani-Hamed and S. Dimopoulos, Supersymmetric unification without low energy supersymmetry and signatures for fine-tuning at the LHC, JHEP 06 (2005) 073 [hep-th/0405159]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  72. [72]

    Split Supersymmetry

    G.F. Giudice and A. Romanino, Split supersymmetry, Nucl. Phys. B 699 (2004) 65 [hep-ph/0406088]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  73. [73]

    Higgs Mass and Unnatural Supersymmetry

    E. Bagnaschi, G.F. Giudice, P. Slavich and A. Strumia, Higgs Mass and Unnatural Supersymmetry, JHEP 09 (2014) 092 [1407.4081]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  74. [74]

    ATLAS collaboration, Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B 716 (2012) 1 [1207.7214]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  75. [75]

    CMS collaboration, Observation of a New Boson at a Mass of 125 GeV with the CMS Experiment at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B 716 (2012) 30 [1207.7235]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  76. [76]

    MSSM-to-SMEFT matching code and results, release v0.1.0

    S. Kraml, A. Lessa, S. Prakash and F. Wilsch, “MSSM-to-SMEFT matching code and results, release v0.1.0.” 10.5281/zenodo.15602469, June, 2025

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.15602469 2025

  77. [77]

    Matchete v0.3.0

    J. Fuentes-Mart ´ın, M. K¨onig, J. Pag`es, A.E. Thomsen and F. Wilsch, “Matchete v0.3.0.” https://gitlab.com/matchete/matchete/tree/v0.3.0, June, 2025

    work page 2025

  78. [78]

    Probing High-Scale and Split Supersymmetry with Higgs Mass Measurements

    G.F. Giudice and A. Strumia, Probing High-Scale and Split Supersymmetry with Higgs Mass Measurements, Nucl. Phys. B 858 (2012) 63 [1108.6077]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  79. [79]

    Improved determination of the Higgs mass in the MSSM with heavy superpartners

    E. Bagnaschi, J. Pardo Vega and P. Slavich, Improved determination of the Higgs mass in the MSSM with heavy superpartners, Eur. Phys. J. C 77 (2017) 334 [1703.08166]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  80. [80]

    What do precision Higgs measurements buy us?

    B. Henning, X. Lu and H. Murayama, What do precision Higgs measurements buy us?, 1404.1058. – 50 –

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

Showing first 80 references.