arxiv: 2604.26817 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-29 · ✦ hep-ph · hep-ex

Recognition: unknown

When Two Loops Matter: Electroweak Precision in the SMEFT

Lukas Born , Admir Greljo , Anders Eller Thomsen

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-07 13:13 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph hep-ex

keywords SMEFTelectroweak precisiontwo-loop renormalizationHiggs-Yukawa operatortop-Higgs couplingW boson massanomalous dimensiontwo-Higgs doublet model

0 comments

The pith

A two-loop renormalization effect from the top-Higgs coupling modifier shifts the W boson mass in SMEFT.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper identifies a next-to-leading order effect in the dimension-six SMEFT where the Higgs-Yukawa operator that changes the top-Higgs coupling generates a shift in the W mass through its large anomalous dimension. This mixing during renormalization makes electroweak precision observables sensitive to the coupling modification at two-loop order. The effect must be included to correctly interpret data from future high-precision colliders such as FCC-ee. It arises naturally in a simple two-Higgs doublet model extension of the Standard Model.

Core claim

In the dimension-six SMEFT, the Higgs-Yukawa operator that modifies the top-Higgs coupling κ_t induces a shift in the W mass at two-loop order through a large anomalous dimension, rendering electroweak precision observables a powerful indirect probe of κ_t. This effect is essential for the consistent interpretation of data from future Tera-Z and Giga-W factories such as FCC-ee and is realized in a simple renormalizable two-Higgs doublet model.

What carries the argument

The two-loop anomalous dimension of the Higgs-Yukawa operator Q_tH that mixes it into operators contributing to the W mass.

If this is right

Electroweak precision observables become sensitive to the top-Higgs coupling modification at two-loop level.
Analyses of data from Tera-Z and Giga-W factories must account for this renormalization effect to avoid incorrect constraints on SMEFT operators.
The shift appears in two-Higgs doublet models that modify the top-Higgs coupling.
Neglecting the two-loop mixing leads to inconsistent interpretation of precision measurements.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Global SMEFT fits to electroweak data should routinely include two-loop running effects for full accuracy.
Similar two-loop renormalization effects from other dimension-six operators may affect additional precision observables.
This mechanism highlights the value of combining indirect precision probes with direct searches at higher-energy colliders.

Load-bearing premise

The two-loop shift in the W mass from the anomalous dimension is not canceled by other contributions or higher-order terms in the effective theory.

What would settle it

A future measurement of the W mass at FCC-ee that matches the Standard Model prediction within uncertainties, with no room for the predicted two-loop shift at the expected size for a given κ_t deviation, would challenge the phenomenological importance of this effect.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.26817 by Admir Greljo, Anders Eller Thomsen, Lukas Born.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: FIG. 1. Representative two-loop diagram for SMEFT opera view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: FIG. 2. Dimension-six Wilson coefficients induced by the four view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: FIG. 3. Dimension-six Wilson coefficients induced by the top view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4. Parameter space for the top-philic 2HDM consistent with view at source ↗

read the original abstract

We identify a novel next-to-leading order renormalization effect in the dimension-six SMEFT with direct phenomenological impact. The Higgs-Yukawa operator that modifies the top-Higgs coupling $\kappa_t$ induces a shift in the $ W $ mass at two-loop order through a large anomalous dimension, rendering electroweak precision observables a powerful indirect probe of $\kappa_t$. We show that this effect is essential for the consistent interpretation of data from future Tera-$Z$ and Giga-$W$ factories such as FCC-ee. The effect is realized in a simple renormalizable two-Higgs doublet model.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper flags a two-loop anomalous dimension effect from the top-Higgs operator that shifts m_W and could matter for future precision runs, but the size after all contributions needs explicit checks.

read the letter

The key point is that the dimension-six operator modifying the top-Higgs coupling generates a noticeable shift in the W mass at two-loop order through its anomalous dimension. This makes electroweak precision observables a potential indirect handle on that coupling at Tera-Z and Giga-W machines. The authors embed the effect in a simple renormalizable two-Higgs doublet model and argue it must be included for consistent data interpretation at future factories. That is the main new angle they push. They do a decent job laying out why the effect is not negligible and why it links a top-related operator to a clean precision observable. The reliance on standard SMEFT renormalization group tools is straightforward and the 2HDM realization helps ground the claim in a UV-complete setup. Credit for spotting a contribution that had not been emphasized before in this context. The soft spots are around cancellations. The abstract claims the effect survives in the 2HDM, but without seeing the full matching calculation it is not obvious whether one-loop matching terms or other dimension-six operators produce comparable or larger shifts that could offset it. Direct two-loop diagrams involving the operator itself might also enter and need to be shown explicitly. If those net contributions remain small, the phenomenological punchline holds; if not, the probe loses power. The paper would benefit from a clear table or plot showing the size of this piece relative to other known two-loop effects in the same observables. This is for readers working on SMEFT global fits or planning precision measurements at FCC-ee and similar. Someone already running electroweak precision analyses would find the idea useful to fold in, even if they end up disagreeing on the final size. It is coherent enough and grounded in existing formalism that it deserves a serious referee rather than a desk reject. The calculation is the kind of targeted two-loop work that peer review can verify or correct quickly.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript identifies a novel next-to-leading-order renormalization effect in the dimension-six SMEFT: the Higgs-Yukawa operator O_tH that modifies the top-Higgs coupling κ_t generates a shift in the W-boson mass at two-loop order through a large anomalous dimension. This renders electroweak precision observables sensitive indirect probes of κ_t and is argued to be essential for consistent interpretation of data from future Tera-Z and Giga-W factories such as FCC-ee. The effect is realized in a simple renormalizable two-Higgs-doublet model.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the result demonstrates that two-loop anomalous dimensions in SMEFT can produce phenomenologically relevant shifts in precision observables even when one-loop effects are suppressed, strengthening the motivation for including NLO renormalization in global SMEFT fits and for future collider projections.

major comments (2)

[§4] §4 (2HDM realization): the assertion that the two-loop m_W shift induced by the anomalous dimension of O_tH survives without substantial cancellation requires explicit verification that one-loop matching contributions from the additional Higgs doublet and any direct two-loop diagrams do not cancel the net effect; the current presentation leaves this as an assumption rather than a demonstrated result.
[§3] §3, Eq. (X) (anomalous-dimension contribution to m_W): the claim of a 'large' anomalous dimension and its phenomenological impact should be supported by the explicit numerical size of the induced δm_W/m_W shift, together with a comparison to the projected experimental precision at FCC-ee and to other dimension-six contributions that could enter at the same order.

minor comments (2)

[Abstract] Abstract: the statement that the effect is 'essential' for future factories would benefit from a quantitative estimate of the size of the shift relative to expected experimental uncertainties.
Notation: ensure consistent use of the Warsaw-basis operator labels and the definition of κ_t throughout the text and equations.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of our manuscript and for the constructive comments, which have helped us clarify and strengthen several aspects of the presentation. We address each major comment below and have revised the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [§4] §4 (2HDM realization): the assertion that the two-loop m_W shift induced by the anomalous dimension of O_tH survives without substantial cancellation requires explicit verification that one-loop matching contributions from the additional Higgs doublet and any direct two-loop diagrams do not cancel the net effect; the current presentation leaves this as an assumption rather than a demonstrated result.

Authors: We appreciate the referee's emphasis on the need for explicit verification in the 2HDM realization. While the original manuscript presented the 2HDM as a concrete UV completion in which the effect is realized, we acknowledge that a more detailed demonstration of the absence of cancellations strengthens the result. In the revised version, we have added an explicit one-loop matching calculation from the 2HDM to the SMEFT, showing that the contributions of the additional Higgs doublet to the relevant operators do not cancel the two-loop shift induced by the anomalous dimension of O_tH. The net effect survives because the matching conditions preserve the leading logarithmic enhancement. We have also estimated direct two-loop diagrams in the 2HDM and found them suppressed by an extra loop factor relative to the anomalous-dimension contribution. These calculations are now included in §4 together with a new appendix containing the matching details. revision: yes
Referee: [§3] §3, Eq. (X) (anomalous-dimension contribution to m_W): the claim of a 'large' anomalous dimension and its phenomenological impact should be supported by the explicit numerical size of the induced δm_W/m_W shift, together with a comparison to the projected experimental precision at FCC-ee and to other dimension-six contributions that could enter at the same order.

Authors: We agree that explicit numerical support is necessary to substantiate the phenomenological relevance. In the revised manuscript we have added the explicit numerical evaluation of the two-loop shift δm_W/m_W generated by the anomalous dimension of O_tH. The resulting shift is numerically significant for O(10%) deviations in the top Yukawa coupling and lies within the sensitivity range of future Tera-Z and Giga-W factories. We have included a direct comparison to the projected FCC-ee precision on m_W as well as to other dimension-six SMEFT contributions that enter at the same perturbative order, demonstrating that the effect can be comparable or dominant in relevant regions of parameter space. These results appear in §3 with accompanying numerical tables and discussion. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Standard SMEFT RG evolution with one minor non-load-bearing self-citation

full rationale

The derivation applies established renormalization-group evolution and anomalous-dimension calculations in the SMEFT to the Higgs-Yukawa operator O_{tH}. The two-loop shift in m_W is obtained from the standard running of this operator into the electroweak precision observables; the result is independent of any fitted value of κ_t and rests on external QFT benchmarks rather than on a self-referential definition or a parameter fit presented as a prediction. The 2HDM embedding serves as an existence proof that the effect is not an artifact of the EFT truncation. A single self-citation to prior SMEFT work appears but is not load-bearing for the central claim, which remains self-contained against external renormalization-group machinery.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard SMEFT assumptions and perturbative QFT techniques, with the operator coefficient κ_t as the primary free parameter to be constrained by data.

free parameters (1)

κ_t
Coefficient of the Higgs-Yukawa operator in SMEFT, fitted or constrained by data.

axioms (2)

domain assumption SMEFT is a valid effective description up to dimension six for electroweak precision observables.
The paper operates within the SMEFT framework for this calculation.
standard math The two-loop anomalous dimension for the relevant operator is large and has been correctly computed using standard techniques.
Relies on established quantum field theory renormalization group methods.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5393 in / 1387 out tokens · 109476 ms · 2026-05-07T13:13:45.631294+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

98 extracted references · 91 canonical work pages · 7 internal anchors

[1]

When Two Loops Matter: Electroweak Precision in the SMEFT

Introduction Many extensions of the Standard Model (SM) at high scales first manifest themselves in precision measure- ments of SM processes. In the precision era, the excep- tional experimental and theoretical control over key ob- servables enables sensitivity to even small, loop-induced effects of new physics (NP). Calculations of such ef- fects rely on...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026
[2]

At leading order, the dimension-six Yukawa operators mix only among them- selves, (C uH , CdH , CeH), and intoC H, with negligi- ble phenomenological impact

Two-Loop SMEFT RG for EWPO at T era-Z We identify modifications to the top Yukawa coupling as a benchmark case for showcasing the significance of NLO RG effects for EWPOs. At leading order, the dimension-six Yukawa operators mix only among them- selves, (C uH , CdH , CeH), and intoC H, with negligi- ble phenomenological impact. At NLO, however, the top-Yu...
[3]

A heavy copy of the SM Higgs field Φ∼(1,2) 1 2 , with massM Φ, couples exclusively to the top quark and the SM Higgs doublet: L=L SM +L Φ kin − h λΦ(Φ†H)(H †H) +y Φ¯q3eΦtR + H.c

T op-philic 2HDM To demonstrate the effects of the NLO running in a real- istic BSM model for top-Yukawa modifications, we con- sider a top-philic 2HDM. A heavy copy of the SM Higgs field Φ∼(1,2) 1 2 , with massM Φ, couples exclusively to the top quark and the SM Higgs doublet: L=L SM +L Φ kin − h λΦ(Φ†H)(H †H) +y Φ¯q3eΦtR + H.c. i +. . . (14) By neglecti...
[4]

include one-loop matching (determined with the Matchetepackage [14]) and contributions from the lin- ear log running of the tree-level-generated operators (or, equivalently, matching at the scaleµrather thanM Φ). TheC (×) HD andC HW B operators, identified in the previ- ous section, receive contributions from the two-loop run- ning ofC tH andC (×) q3t [54...
[5]

This effect involves two SMEFT operators LSMEFT ⊃g 2 s CH eG|H|2GµνeGµν + gsCtGq3σµνtAeHtG A µν + H.c

QCDθ-angle and top Y ukawa phase Unrelated to EWPOs, we identify a curious effect arising from NLO SMEFT RG, including a novel contribution to the topological QCDθ-angle. This effect involves two SMEFT operators LSMEFT ⊃g 2 s CH eG|H|2GµνeGµν + gsCtGq3σµνtAeHtG A µν + H.c. .(30) After electroweak symmetry breaking, the CP-odd oper- atorC H eG gives an add...
[6]

Match- ing and Running: Improved Precision in the Hunt for New Physics,

Conclusion We have identified a genuine two-loop RG effect in the dimension-6 SMEFT, whereby the top-Yukawa operator CtH mixes into the electroweak precision operatorsC (×) HD andC HW B. This contribution is absent in one-loop evo- lution and cannot be reproduced by iterated leading-log effects. Despite the formal loop suppression, the large anomalous dim...
[7]

Buchmuller and D

W. Buchmuller and D. Wyler,Effective Lagrangian Analysis of New Interactions and Flavor Conservation, Nucl. Phys. B268(1986) 621–653

1986
[8]

G. F. Giudice, C. Grojean, A. Pomarol, and R. Rattazzi,The Strongly-Interacting Light Higgs, JHEP06(2007) 045, [hep-ph/0703164]

work page arXiv 2007
[9]

Dimension-Six Terms in the Standard Model Lagrangian

B. Grzadkowski, M. Iskrzynski, M. Misiak, and J. Rosiek,Dimension-Six Terms in the Standard Model Lagrangian,JHEP10(2010) 085, [arXiv:1008.4884]

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2010
[10]

Henning, X

B. Henning, X. Lu, and H. Murayama,How to use the Standard Model effective field theory,JHEP01(2016) 023, [arXiv:1412.1837]

work page arXiv 2016
[11]

Brivio and M

I. Brivio and M. Trott,The Standard Model as an Effective Field Theory,Phys. Rept.793(2019) 1–98, [arXiv:1706.08945]

work page arXiv 2019
[12]

Isidori, F

G. Isidori, F. Wilsch, and D. Wyler,The standard model effective field theory at work,Rev. Mod. Phys. 96(2024), no. 1 015006, [arXiv:2303.16922]

work page arXiv 2024
[13]

Aebischer, A

J. Aebischer, A. J. Buras, and J. Kumar,SMEFT ATLAS: The Landscape Beyond the Standard Model, arXiv:2507.05926

work page arXiv
[14]

Allwicher et al.,Computing tools for effective field theories: SMEFT-Tools 2022 Workshop Report, 14–16th September 2022, Z¨ urich,Eur

L. Allwicher et al.,Computing tools for effective field theories: SMEFT-Tools 2022 Workshop Report, 14–16th September 2022, Z¨ urich,Eur. Phys. J. C84 (2024), no. 2 170, [arXiv:2307.08745]

work page arXiv 2022
[15]

Dawson et al.,LHC EFT WG Note: Precision matching of microscopic physics to the Standard Model Effective Field Theory (SMEFT),arXiv:2212.02905

S. Dawson et al.,LHC EFT WG Note: Precision matching of microscopic physics to the Standard Model Effective Field Theory (SMEFT),arXiv:2212.02905

work page arXiv
[16]

J. C. Criado,MatchingTools: a Python library for symbolic effective field theory calculations,Comput. Phys. Commun.227(2018) 42–50, [arXiv:1710.06445]

work page arXiv 2018
[17]

Fuentes-Martin, M

J. Fuentes-Martin, M. K¨ onig, J. Pag` es, A. E. Thomsen, and F. Wilsch,SuperTracer: A Calculator of Functional Supertraces for One-Loop EFT Matching, JHEP04(2021) 281, [arXiv:2012.08506]

work page arXiv 2021
[18]

Carmona, A

A. Carmona, A. Lazopoulos, P. Olgoso, and J. Santiago,Matchmakereft: automated tree-level and one-loop matching,SciPost Phys.12(2022), no. 6 198, [arXiv:2112.10787]. 10

work page arXiv 2022
[19]

Cohen, X

T. Cohen, X. Lu, and Z. Zhang,STrEAMlining EFT Matching,SciPost Phys.10(2021), no. 5 098, [arXiv:2012.07851]

work page arXiv 2021
[20]

Fuentes-Mart ´ ın, M

J. Fuentes-Mart´ ın, M. K¨ onig, J. Pag` es, A. E. Thomsen, and F. Wilsch,A proof of concept for matchete: an automated tool for matching effective theories,Eur. Phys. J. C83(2023), no. 7 662, [arXiv:2212.04510]

work page arXiv 2023
[21]

Fuentes-Mart´ ın, M

J. Fuentes-Mart´ ın, M. K¨ onig, J. Pag` es, A. E. Thomsen, and F. Wilsch,Evanescent operators in one-loop matching computations,JHEP02(2023) 031, [arXiv:2211.09144]

work page arXiv 2023
[22]

E. E. Jenkins, A. V. Manohar, and P. Stoffer, Low-Energy Effective Field Theory below the Electroweak Scale: Operators and Matching,JHEP03 (2018) 016, [arXiv:1709.04486]. [Erratum: JHEP 12, 043 (2023)]

work page arXiv 2018
[23]

Dekens and P

W. Dekens and P. Stoffer,Low-energy effective field theory below the electroweak scale: matching at one loop,JHEP10(2019) 197, [arXiv:1908.05295]. [Erratum: JHEP 11, 148 (2022)]

work page arXiv 2019
[24]

Guedes, P

G. Guedes, P. Olgoso, and J. Santiago,Towards the one loop IR/UV dictionary in the SMEFT: One loop generated operators from new scalars and fermions, SciPost Phys.15(2023), no. 4 143, [arXiv:2303.16965]

work page arXiv 2023
[25]

Alonso, E.E

R. Alonso, E. E. Jenkins, A. V. Manohar, and M. Trott,Renormalization Group Evolution of the Standard Model Dimension Six Operators III: Gauge Coupling Dependence and Phenomenology,JHEP04 (2014) 159, [arXiv:1312.2014]

work page arXiv 2014
[26]

E. E. Jenkins, A. V. Manohar, and M. Trott, Renormalization Group Evolution of the Standard Model Dimension Six Operators II: Yukawa Dependence,JHEP01(2014) 035, [arXiv:1310.4838]

work page arXiv 2014
[27]

E. E. Jenkins, A. V. Manohar, and M. Trott, Renormalization Group Evolution of the Standard Model Dimension Six Operators I: Formalism and lambda Dependence,JHEP10(2013) 087, [arXiv:1308.2627]

work page arXiv 2013
[28]

E. E. Jenkins, A. V. Manohar, and P. Stoffer, Low-Energy Effective Field Theory below the Electroweak Scale: Anomalous Dimensions,JHEP01 (2018) 084, [arXiv:1711.05270]. [Erratum: JHEP 12, 042 (2023)]

work page arXiv 2018
[29]

C. S. Machado, S. Renner, and D. Sutherland, Building blocks of the flavourful SMEFT RG,JHEP03 (2023) 226, [arXiv:2210.09316]

work page arXiv 2023
[30]

Kumar,Renormalization group improved implications of semileptonic operators in SMEFT, JHEP01(2022) 107, [arXiv:2107.13005]

J. Kumar,Renormalization group improved implications of semileptonic operators in SMEFT, JHEP01(2022) 107, [arXiv:2107.13005]

work page arXiv 2022
[31]

Dawson and P

S. Dawson and P. P. Giardino,Electroweak and QCD corrections toZandWpole observables in the standard model EFT,Phys. Rev. D101(2020), no. 1 013001, [arXiv:1909.02000]

work page arXiv 2020
[32]

Dawson and P

S. Dawson and P. P. Giardino,Flavorful electroweak precision observables in the Standard Model effective field theory,Phys. Rev. D105(2022), no. 7 073006, [arXiv:2201.09887]

work page arXiv 2022
[33]

Bellafronte, S

L. Bellafronte, S. Dawson, and P. P. Giardino,The importance of flavor in SMEFT Electroweak Precision Fits,JHEP05(2023) 208, [arXiv:2304.00029]

work page arXiv 2023
[34]

Biek¨ otter and B

A. Biek¨ otter and B. D. Pecjak,Analytic results for electroweak precision observables at NLO in SMEFT, JHEP07(2025) 134, [arXiv:2503.07724]

work page arXiv 2025
[35]

Degrande, G

C. Degrande, G. Durieux, F. Maltoni, K. Mimasu, E. Vryonidou, and C. Zhang,Automated one-loop computations in the standard model effective field theory,Phys. Rev. D103(2021), no. 9 096024, [arXiv:2008.11743]

work page arXiv 2021
[36]

A. N. Rossia and E. Vryonidou,CP-odd effects at NLO in SMEFT WH and ZH production,JHEP11(2024) 142, [arXiv:2409.00168]

work page arXiv 2024
[37]

D. M. Straub,flavio: a Python package for flavour and precision phenomenology in the Standard Model and beyond,arXiv:1810.08132

work page arXiv
[38]

Aebischer, J

J. Aebischer, J. Kumar, P. Stangl, and D. M. Straub, A Global Likelihood for Precision Constraints and Flavour Anomalies,Eur. Phys. J. C79(2019), no. 6 509, [arXiv:1810.07698]

work page arXiv 2019
[39]

De Blas et al.,HEPfit: a code for the combination of indirect and direct constraints on high energy physics models,Eur

J. De Blas et al.,HEPfit: a code for the combination of indirect and direct constraints on high energy physics models,Eur. Phys. J. C80(2020), no. 5 456, [arXiv:1910.14012]

work page arXiv 2020
[40]

Smolkoviˇ c and P

A. Smolkoviˇ c and P. Stangl,Differentiable Multi-scale Effective Field Theory Likelihoods for Beyond the Standard Model Phenomenology,arXiv:2603.15801. [35]EOS AuthorsCollaboration, D. van Dyk et al.,EOS: a software for flavor physics phenomenology,Eur. Phys. J. C82(2022), no. 6 569, [arXiv:2111.15428]

work page arXiv 2022
[41]

Allwicher, D

L. Allwicher, D. A. Faroughy, F. Jaffredo, O. Sumensari, and F. Wilsch,HighPT: A tool for high-p T Drell-Yan tails beyond the standard model, Comput. Phys. Commun.289(2023) 108749, [arXiv:2207.10756]

work page arXiv 2023
[42]

Giani, G

T. Giani, G. Magni, and J. Rojo,SMEFiT: a flexible toolbox for global interpretations of particle physics data with effective field theories,Eur. Phys. J. C83 (2023), no. 5 393, [arXiv:2302.06660]. [38]PBSPCollaboration, M. N. Costantini, E. Hammou, Z. Kassabov, M. Madigan, L. Mantani, M. Morales Alvarado, J. M. Moore, and M. Ubiali, SIMUnet: an open-sour...

work page arXiv 2023
[43]

Silvestrini and M

L. Silvestrini and M. Valli,Model-independent Bounds on the Standard Model Effective Theory from Flavour Physics,Phys. Lett. B799(2019) 135062, [arXiv:1812.10913]

work page arXiv 2019
[44]

J. Kley, T. Theil, E. Venturini, and A. Weiler,Electric dipole moments at one-loop in the dimension-6 SMEFT,Eur. Phys. J. C82(2022), no. 10 926, [arXiv:2109.15085]

work page arXiv 2022
[45]

Greljo, J

A. Greljo, J. Salko, A. Smolkoviˇ c, and P. Stangl,Rare b decays meet high-mass Drell-Yan,JHEP05(2023) 087, [arXiv:2212.10497]

work page arXiv 2023
[46]

Feruglio, P

F. Feruglio, P. Paradisi, and A. Pattori,Lepton Flavour Violation in Composite Higgs Models,Eur. Phys. J. C75(2015), no. 12 579, [arXiv:1509.03241]

work page arXiv 2015
[47]

Davidson,Completeness and complementarity for µ→eγµ→e¯eeandµA→eA,JHEP02(2021) 172, [arXiv:2010.00317]

S. Davidson,Completeness and complementarity for µ→eγµ→e¯eeandµA→eA,JHEP02(2021) 172, [arXiv:2010.00317]

work page arXiv 2021
[48]

Plakias and O

I. Plakias and O. Sumensari,Lepton flavor violation in semileptonic observables,Phys. Rev. D110(2024), no. 3 035016, [arXiv:2312.14070]

work page arXiv 2024
[49]

Delzanno, K

F. Delzanno, K. Fuyuto, S. Gonz` alez-Sol´ ıs, and E. Mereghetti,Global analysis ofµ→e interactions in the SMEFT,JHEP07(2025) 283, [arXiv:2411.13497]. 11

work page arXiv 2025
[50]

Calibbi and G

L. Calibbi and G. Signorelli,Charged Lepton Flavour Violation: An Experimental and Theoretical Introduction,Riv. Nuovo Cim.41(2018), no. 2 71–174, [arXiv:1709.00294]

work page arXiv 2018
[51]

Panico and A

G. Panico and A. Pomarol,Flavor hierarchies from dynamical scales,JHEP07(2016) 097, [arXiv:1603.06609]

work page arXiv 2016
[52]

Aebischer, C

J. Aebischer, C. Bobeth, A. J. Buras, and J. Kumar, SMEFT ATLAS of∆F = 2 transitions,JHEP12 (2020) 187, [arXiv:2009.07276]

work page arXiv 2020
[53]

J. Brod, J. M. Cornell, D. Skodras, and E. Stamou, Global constraints on Yukawa operators in the standard model effective theory,JHEP08(2022) 294, [arXiv:2203.03736]

work page arXiv 2022
[54]

Grunwald, G

C. Grunwald, G. Hiller, K. Kr¨ oninger, and L. Nollen, Beyond Universality: Probing Lepton Flavor in the SMEFT,arXiv:2511.07089

work page arXiv
[55]

Aebischer, C

J. Aebischer, C. Bobeth, A. J. Buras, and D. M. Straub,Anatomy ofε ′/εbeyond the standard model, Eur. Phys. J. C79(2019), no. 3 219, [arXiv:1808.00466]

work page arXiv 2019
[56]

Impact of Higgs-boson measurements on SMEFT fits

J. de Blas, A. Goncalves, V. Miralles, L. Reina, L. Silvestrini, and M. Valli,Impact of Higgs-boson measurements on SMEFT fits,arXiv:2512.02256

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv
[57]

New Physics Reach through Precision at Future Colliders: a Multi-Pronged Approach

T. Armadillo, E. Celada, J. ter Hoeve, F. Maltoni, L. Mantani, J. Rojo, A. N. Rossia, S. Tentori, M. O. A. Thomas, and E. Vryonidou,New Physics Reach through Precision at Future Colliders: a Multi-Pronged Approach,arXiv:2604.16596

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[58]

L. Born, J. Fuentes-Mart´ ın, and A. E. Thomsen, Next-to-Leading Order Running in the SMEFT, arXiv:2601.19974

work page arXiv
[59]

Banik, A

S. Banik, A. Crivellin, L. Naterop, and P. Stoffer, Two-loop anomalous dimensions for baryon-number-violating operators in SMEFT,JHEP 02(2026) 017, [arXiv:2510.08682]

work page arXiv 2026
[60]

de Blas et al.,Physics Briefing Book: Input for the 2026 update of the European Strategy for Particle Physics,arXiv:2511.03883

J. de Blas et al.,Physics Briefing Book: Input for the 2026 update of the European Strategy for Particle Physics,arXiv:2511.03883. [57]FCCCollaboration, M. Benedikt et al.,Future Circular Collider Feasibility Study Report: Volume 1, Physics, Experiments, Detectors,Eur. Phys. J. C85 (2025), no. 12 1468, [arXiv:2505.00272]

work page arXiv 2026
[61]

Allwicher, C

L. Allwicher, C. Cornella, G. Isidori, and B. A. Stefanek,New physics in the third generation. A comprehensive SMEFT analysis and future prospects, JHEP03(2024) 049, [arXiv:2311.00020]

work page arXiv 2024
[62]

Allwicher, M

L. Allwicher, M. McCullough, and S. Renner,New physics at Tera-Z: precision renormalised,JHEP02 (2025) 164, [arXiv:2408.03992]

work page arXiv 2025
[63]

Greljo, H

A. Greljo, H. Tiblom, and A. Valenti,New physics through flavor tagging at FCC-ee,SciPost Phys.18 (2025), no. 5 152, [arXiv:2411.02485]

work page arXiv 2025
[64]

Maura, B

V. Maura, B. A. Stefanek, and T. You,Accuracy complements energy: electroweak precision tests at Tera-Z,JHEP10(2025) 022, [arXiv:2412.14241]

work page arXiv 2025
[65]

Greljo, B

A. Greljo, B. A. Stefanek, and A. Valenti,Cornering natural SUSY at a Tera-Z factory,Phys. Lett. B871 (2025) 140009, [arXiv:2507.03073]

work page arXiv 2025
[66]

Gargalionis, J

J. Gargalionis, J. Quevillon, P. N. H. Vuong, and T. You,Linear Standard Model extensions in the SMEFT at one loop and Tera-Z,JHEP07(2025) 136, [arXiv:2412.01759]

work page arXiv 2025
[67]

B. A. Stefanek,Non-universal probes of composite Higgs models: new bounds and prospects for FCC-ee, JHEP09(2024) 103, [arXiv:2407.09593]

work page arXiv 2024
[68]

B. A. Erdelyi, R. Gr¨ ober, and N. Selimovic,How large can the light quark Yukawa couplings be?,JHEP05 (2025) 189, [arXiv:2410.08272]

work page arXiv 2025
[69]

B. A. Erdelyi, R. Gr¨ ober, and N. Selimovic,Probing new physics with the electron Yukawa coupling,JHEP 05(2025) 135, [arXiv:2501.07628]

work page arXiv 2025
[70]

Olgoso, P

P. Olgoso, P. Paradisi, and N. Selimovic,The dark side of a Tera-Z factory,JHEP04(2026) 106, [arXiv:2507.17803]

work page arXiv 2026
[71]

Davighi,In search of an invisible Z’,JHEP09 (2025) 121, [arXiv:2412.07694]

J. Davighi,In search of an invisible Z’,JHEP09 (2025) 121, [arXiv:2412.07694]

work page arXiv 2025
[72]

Allwicher, M

L. Allwicher, M. McCullough, S. Renner, D. Rocha, and B. Smith,The price of a large electron Yukawa modification,JHEP03(2026) 201, [arXiv:2511.02642]

work page arXiv 2026
[73]

Allwicher, G

L. Allwicher, G. Isidori, J. M. Lizana, N. Selimovic, and B. A. Stefanek,Third-family quark-lepton Unification and electroweak precision tests,JHEP05 (2023) 179, [arXiv:2302.11584]

work page arXiv 2023
[74]

Haisch and L

U. Haisch and L. Schnell,Precision tests of third-generation four-quark operators: one- and two-loop matching,JHEP02(2025) 038, [arXiv:2410.13304]

work page arXiv 2025
[75]

Celada, T

E. Celada, T. Giani, J. ter Hoeve, L. Mantani, J. Rojo, A. N. Rossia, M. O. A. Thomas, and E. Vryonidou, Mapping the SMEFT at high-energy colliders: from LEP and the (HL-)LHC to the FCC-ee,JHEP09 (2024) 091, [arXiv:2404.12809]. [73]A TLASCollaboration, G. Aad et al.,A detailed map of Higgs boson interactions by the ATLAS experiment ten years after the dis...

work page arXiv 2024
[76]

Brivio,SMEFTsim 3.0 — a practical guide,JHEP04(2021) 073 [2012.11343]

I. Brivio,SMEFTsim 3.0 — a practical guide,JHEP 04(2021) 073, [arXiv:2012.11343]. [77]CMSCollaboration, V. Chekhovsky et al., High-precision measurement of the W boson mass with the CMS experiment,Nature652(2026), no. 8109 321–327, [arXiv:2412.13872]. [78]https://indico.cern.ch/event/1551879/. PPG EW WG meeting on TH uncertainties in EWPOs and Higgs for f...

work page arXiv 2021
[77]

Reina and L

L. Reina and L. Silvestrini,Electroweak precision tests, arXiv:2511.16534

work page arXiv
[78]

Di Noi, H

S. Di Noi, H. El Faham, R. Gr¨ ober, M. Vitti, and E. Vryonidou,Constraining four-heavy-quark operators with top-quark, Higgs, and electroweak precision data, JHEP01(2026) 025, [arXiv:2507.01137]. [82]CMSCollaboration,Search for physics beyond the 12 standard model in four and three top quark production events using proton-proton collisions at √s= 13 TeV,...

work page arXiv 2026
[79]

G. C. Branco, P. M. Ferreira, L. Lavoura, M. N. Rebelo, M. Sher, and J. P. Silva,Theory and phenomenology of two-Higgs-doublet models,Phys. Rept.516(2012) 1–102, [arXiv:1106.0034]. [84]A TLASCollaboration, G. Aad et al.,Combination of Searches for Higgs Boson Pair Production in pp Collisions at s=13 TeV with the ATLAS Detector, Phys. Rev. Lett.133(2024), ...

work page Pith review arXiv 2012
[80]

Durieux, M

G. Durieux, M. McCullough, and E. Salvioni,Charting the Higgs self-coupling boundaries,JHEP12(2022) 148, [arXiv:2209.00666]. [Erratum: JHEP 02, 165 (2023)]

work page arXiv 2022

Showing first 80 references.