Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 7 minor 38 references

BO-graphane and BO-diamane

T0 review · 3 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper predicts that fully covering graphene with boron and oxygen atoms on both sides produces two stable two-dimensional materials, BO-graphane and BO-diamane, that are stiffer than existing diamanes and conduct heat nearly as well…

desk verdict A plausible new 2D carbon material prediction, but the thermodynamic stability claim outruns the evidence. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.05578 v1 pith:6QPBMFNK submitted 2025-06-05 cond-mat.mtrl-sci physics.chem-ph

Babu Ram , Rohit Anand , Arun S. Nissimagoudar , Geunsik Lee , Rodney S Ruoff This is my paper
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sciphysics.chem-ph
keywords BO-graphaneBO-diamanegraphenefunctionalizationtwo-dimensionaldiamondlatticethermalconductivitywidebandgapsemiconductorfirst-principlesDFTelasticmodulus
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper predicts that fully covering monolayer graphene with alternating boron and oxygen atoms—one B–O pair per two carbons, on both sides—converts it into a buckled semiconducting sheet (BO-graphane), and that the same treatment of bilayer or trilayer graphene yields a diamond-like carbon film capped by boron monoxide layers (BO-diamane). Using density functional theory, the authors argue these materials are thermodynamically and dynamically stable, surviving 45 ps simulations at 1000 K with no imaginary vibrational modes. The payoff of the claim is concrete: diamond-like films made by surface chemistry rather than high pressure, combining elastic moduli of roughly 660–907 GPa, wide indirect band gaps of 3.55–4.22 eV, and room-temperature lattice thermal conductivities of 879 and 1260 W/m·K for the monolayer and bilayer forms, beating common oxides and F-diamane and rivaling H-diamane. If correct, these are specific target structures for heat-spreading and protective-coating applications.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing motif is the alternating adsorption pattern: on each graphene surface, boron atoms bind to every other carbon atom, and oxygen atoms bridge the boron atoms, producing a honeycomb B–O layer with polar covalent B–O bonds (Bader charge transfer of roughly 1.5 e from boron to oxygen and 0.5 e from boron to carbon). This pattern forces the carbon framework into $\text{sp}^3$ hybridization and, in multilayers, locks the interlayer spacing near diamond values. The stability and property claims are carried by a formation-energy comparison against graphite (the paper's Eq. 1), phonon-dispersion calculations for dynamic stability, ab initio molecular dynamics for thermal stability, finite-strain stress-strain curves for elastic moduli, and an iterative Boltzmann transport solution for lattice thermal conductivity.

What would settle it

A global structure search (for example random sampling or cluster expansion) that finds any B–O covering of monolayer or bilayer graphene with a lower formation energy than the reported 1L or 2L-AB phases would overturn the thermodynamic-stability claim; so would an experiment exposing bilayer graphene to boron and oxygen that yields segregated boron-oxide islands rather than a diamond-like carbon layer with an interlayer spacing near 2.06–2.09 Å.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the central discovery is that the alternating B–O adsorption motif acts as a structural switch: every other carbon of the graphene lattice moves out of plane and bonds to boron, boron bonds to oxygen, and the carbon lattice rehybridizes to $\text{sp}^3$. In a single layer this yields buckled BO-graphane; in AB- or AA-stacked bilayers and in an ABA trilayer, the carbon layers become diamond-like (C–C bond lengths of 1.53–1.57 Å, C–C–C angles near 109.8–109.9°, interlayer spacing 2.065–2.093 Å), forming a two-dimensional diamond film sandwiched between covalent boron-oxygen layers. The paper reports that these compounds have lower formation energies than H-, F-, and OH-diamane; show no imaginary phonon frequencies; remain intact in AIMD at 1000 K; have in-plane elastic moduli of 659–771 GPa for the monolayer/bilayer and up to about 804 GPa (uniaxial) and 907 GPa (biaxial) for the trilayer; have indirect band gaps of 4.22 eV (1L), 3.87–3.91 eV (2L), and 3.55 eV (3L); and have lattice thermal conductivities of 879 and 1260 W/m·K for 1L and 2L-AB. Single-side-covered graphene (ss-1L) breaks down at 300 K, which the authors take as evidence that two-sided B–O coverage is required for stability.

Load-bearing premise

The assumption is that the alternating arrangement of boron and oxygen atoms the authors place by hand on the graphene surface is the lowest-energy arrangement, since no computational search over other B–O patterns or stoichiometries was run.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Boron and oxygen functionalization would provide a low-pressure chemical route to stable diamond-like carbon films, in contrast to the high pressures usually required to convert graphite to diamond.
  • The predicted elastic moduli (750–771 GPa for bilayer BO-diamane, rising to about 804–907 GPa for the trilayer) exceed those of F-, OH-, and H-diamane of similar thickness, suggesting use in ultra-thin protective coatings and composites.
  • Room-temperature lattice thermal conductivities of 879 W/m·K (1L) and 1260 W/m·K (2L-AB) beat BeO, MgO, Al$_2$O$_3$, and F-diamane and approach H-diamane, making these sheets candidates for heat spreading.
  • The band gap is indirect and wide (3.55–4.22 eV) through three layers, pointing toward nanoelectronics and photocatalysis applications.
  • Because single-side coverage is thermally unstable at 300 K, any successful synthesis would need to passivate both graphene faces.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural next step is a global search over other B–O arrangements, because if a different coverage pattern were lower in energy, the predicted phases would not form; the paper does not include such a search.
  • The strongly covalent, charge-polarized B–O cap could function as a chemically passivating shell, plausibly giving air or moisture stability similar to that reported for F-diamane; the paper does not test reactivity or environmental stability.
  • The combination of a wide electronic gap with very high lattice thermal conductivity is unusual; if confirmed experimentally, BO-diamane could serve simultaneously as a heat spreader and a transparent wide-gap substrate, a use the paper does not discuss.
  • A practical synthesis route may be sequential exposure of bilayer graphene to boron and oxygen precursors, and the predicted stability at 1000 K suggests a wide processing window; the paper stops at prediction.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 7 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports first-principles DFT predictions for fully boron- and oxygen-functionalized monolayer graphene (BO-graphane) and multilayer graphene (BO-diamane), with a buckled graphane-like single layer and diamond-like carbon layers in the multilayer cases. It claims thermodynamic and dynamic stability based on formation energies, phonon dispersions, and AIMD at 1000 K, and reports high Young's moduli, wide indirect band gaps (3.55-4.22 eV), and high lattice thermal conductivities (879 and 1260 W/m·K for 1L and 2L-AB, respectively). The methods are standard (VASP, PHONOPY, ShengBTE) and the paper includes comparisons to H-, F-, and OH-diamane. The central stability claim, however, rests on formation energies relative only to elemental reservoirs, without considering competing phases such as B2O3 or alternative B/O decoration patterns, and the abstract's headline elastic modulus values do not match the table entries for the named structures.

Significance. If the predicted structures are indeed stable or even kinetically accessible, BO-graphane and BO-diamane would be interesting additions to the family of functionalized graphene/diamane materials, with potentially attractive mechanical and thermal properties for nanoscale applications. The paper's strengths include the systematic use of standard DFT workflows, phonon stability checks, AIMD thermal stability, and full iterative BTE thermal conductivity calculations, as well as explicit comparisons with existing diamanes. The property predictions are plausible as a computational exploration, but the thermodynamic stability claim is under-supported by the current formation-energy analysis, and this gap is load-bearing for the paper's main narrative.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract and Table 2] The abstract states that BO-graphane has a Young's modulus of 750 GPa and BO-diamane 771 GPa, but Table 2 reports for 1L (BO-graphane) values of 659.66 (x) and 670.58 (y) GPa, and for 2L-AB values of 750.63 (x) and 755.58 (y) GPa, while 2L-AA has y = 771.13 GPa. The abstract numbers thus correspond to specific axes of specific multilayer structures, not to the named 1L and generic BO-diamane structures. This internal inconsistency undermines the headline numerical claims and must be corrected.
  2. [Section 3.1, Eq. (1)] The formation energy is defined relative to graphite, alpha-boron, and O2 only. This does not establish thermodynamic stability because decomposition into more stable compounds, notably B2O3, is not considered. For the C2B2O2 composition, the reaction to graphite plus B2O3 plus elemental boron is likely exothermic given the high stability of B2O3. Also, no global structure search is performed over alternative B/O decoration patterns (e.g., O bonded directly to C, B-O rows, or clustered boron oxides), so a lower-energy functionalization pattern cannot be ruled out. The claim that these structures are 'thermodynamically stable' is therefore overstated; the authors should either add a convex-hull analysis or a comparison to B2O3 and other plausible competing phases, or rephrase the claim to 'metastable' or 'kinetically accessible'.
  3. [Section 3.2 and Table 2] The lattice thermal conductivity is reported in W/m·K, which requires a well-defined film thickness. The manuscript specifies the thickness convention for elastic moduli (outermost atoms plus van der Waals radii) but does not state whether the same or a different thickness is used for thermal conductivity. Without a clearly stated thickness, the comparisons to bulk BeO, MgO, and Al2O3 are ambiguous. Please specify the thickness used and, if appropriate, also report the 2D thermal conductance in W/(m·K) per layer.
minor comments (7)
  1. [Abstract] The unit 'GPA' should be 'GPa' in the abstract.
  2. [References] References [37] and [38] appear to be the same paper (Mortazavi et al., Appl. Surf. Sci. 528, 147035); please deduplicate and renumber.
  3. [Table 2] The row for OH-AB does not list the DS and TS entries that appear for the other structures, and the meaning of 'yes [37]' for F-AB should be clarified in a footnote.
  4. [Figure 2 caption] The caption says 'Formation energy ... with respect to graphite,' but Eq. (1) defines formation energy relative to graphite, alpha-B, and O2; the caption and equation should be made consistent.
  5. [Section 2] For the second-order force constants used in PHONOPY, the supercell size is not specified; please provide this detail.
  6. [Section 3.5] Band gaps are computed with the PBE functional, which typically underestimates gap sizes; a brief caveat or a hybrid-functional check would strengthen the 'wide band gap' claim.
  7. [Section 3.4 and Fig. S2(a)] The AIMD simulation for ss-1L is only 20 ps; the statement that it 'does not maintain structural integrity' should acknowledge the finite simulation time.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: all predicted properties are direct first-principles outputs, with no target-property fitting and no load-bearing self-citations.

full rationale

The paper's load-bearing predictions are direct outputs of DFT geometry optimization, DFPT phonon calculations, AIMD, and iterative BTE thermal-conductivity calculations. Formation energies use Eq. (1), a standard elemental-reference definition; the comparisons among 1L, 2L-AB, 2L-AA, 3L, ss-1L, and known diamanes are obtained by evaluating the same formula for distinct structures, so the ranking is not an input. Elastic moduli are obtained by linear regression of computed stress-strain curves within 2% strain; band gaps are from PBE band structures; thermal conductivity is from ShengBTE with computed second- and third-order force constants. No parameter is fitted to any predicted property, and no uniqueness theorem or disfavored-alternative argument is imported from prior work. The hand-constructed B-O decoration is an ansatz, but it is an assumption about the structure, not a circular derivation of its properties. The manuscript does not perform a global structure search or ternary convex-hull analysis; that is a completeness and correctness limitation, not circularity. Self-citations (e.g., refs. [10] and [18]) are contextual or experimental benchmarks and do not support any derivation by themselves. Therefore no circular step can be exhibited.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 2 assumptions · 2 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard DFT approximations and on the hand-constructed functionalization pattern. The thickness definition for converting 2D stress to GPa is a free modeling choice that scales the reported elastic moduli.

free parameters (1)
  • Thickness definition for 3D elastic modulus = Not specified; uses outermost atoms plus van der Waals radii
    Conversion of 2D stress to GPa depends on this chosen thickness; the vdW radii used for B, C, O are not stated, so E values in GPa carry an unquantified scaling uncertainty.
assumptions (2)
  • domain assumption PBE exchange-correlation functional and DFT-D3 dispersion correction accurately describe the structure, stability, and properties of these B/O functionalized carbon nanosheets.
    All results rest on DFT with these choices; no higher-level validation (e.g., hybrid functionals for band gaps, or experiments) is provided.
  • domain assumption The hand-constructed alternating B-O bonding pattern represents the ground-state functionalization arrangement.
    No global structure search was performed; formation energy and property claims assume this pattern is the stable one.
invented entities (2)
  • BO-graphane (1L)
    purpose: A predicted buckled graphene monolayer fully functionalized with alternating boron and oxygen atoms.
    Predicted only by DFT; no experimental synthesis has been reported.
  • BO-diamane (2L-AB, 2L-AA, 3L)
    purpose: Predicted diamond-like carbon layers sandwiched between boron monoxide layers.
    Predicted only by DFT; no experimental synthesis has been reported.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of BO-graphane and BO-diamane." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/6QPBMFNK

@misc{pith2026250605578,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: BO-graphane and BO-diamane},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/6QPBMFNK}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.05578}
}
abstract

The adsorption of boron and oxygen atoms onto mono- and multi-layer graphene leads to the formation of a buckled graphene layer (BO-graphane) and a 2D diamond-like structure (BO-diamane) sandwiched between boron monoxide layers per DFT calculations. BO-graphane has a calculated Young's modulus ($\it{E}$) of 750 GPA and BO-diamane 771 GPa, higher than the calculated $\it{E}$ of -F,-OH, and -H diamanes; this is due to the presence of B-O bonds in the functionalizing layers. Electronic band structure calculations show BO-graphane and BO-diamane are wide band gap semiconductors with an indirect band gap up to a thickness of three layers (3L). Phonon dispersion and $ab-initio$ molecular dynamics (AIMD) simulations confirm dynamic and thermal stability, maintaining structural integrity at 1000 K. The room-temperature lattice thermal conductivity of BO-graphane and BO-diamane is found to be 879 W/m.K and 1260 W/m.K, respectively, surpassing BeO (385 W/m.K), MgO (64 W/m.K), and Al$_2$O$_3$ (36 W/m.K); and F-diamane (377 W/m.K), and comparable to H-diamane (1145-1960 W/m.K), suggesting them as candidates for thermal management in applications.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.05578 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The mechanism of adsorption of boron and oxygen atoms (a) on a single-sided surface of a graphene sheet, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Formation energy of theoretically predicted (1L, 2L-AB, 2L-AA, 3L, ss-1L, O-diamane, OC-diamane, and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The electron localization function (ELF) for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The phonon dispersion curves for (a) 1L, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The stress-strain response along uniaxial and biaxial directions for (a) 1L, (b) 2L-AB, and (c) 2L-AA is [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: (a) The stress-strain response of 3L along uniaxial and biaxial directions is analyzed to obtain the elastic [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The electronic band structures for (a) 1L, (b) 2L-AB, (c) 2L-AA, and (d) 3L are shown. The red dotted line [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: The density of states for (a) 1L, (b) 2L-AB, (c) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_8.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

38 extracted references · 38 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    R. H. Baughman, H. Eckhardt, M. Kertesz, Structure-property predictions for new planar forms of carbon: Layered phases con- taining sp2 and sp atoms, J. Chem. Phys. 87 (1987) 6687–6699

    work page 1987

  2. [2]

    Bundy, W

    F. Bundy, W. Bassett, M. Weathers, R. Hemley, H. Mao, A. Gon- charov, The pressure-temperature phase and transformation di- agram for carbon; updated through 1994, Carbon 34 (1996) 141–153

    work page 1996

  3. [3]

    V . H. Crespi, L. X. Benedict, M. L. Cohen, S. G. Louie, Pre- diction of a pure-carbon planar covalent metal, Phys. Rev. B 53 (1996) R13303–R13305

    work page 1996

  4. [4]

    Narita, S

    N. Narita, S. Nagai, S. Suzuki, K. Nakao, Optimized geometries and electronic structures of graphyne and its family, Phys. Rev. B 58 (1998) 11009–11014

    work page 1998

  5. [5]

    and Mao, Ho-kwang and Eng, Peter J

    Mao, Wendy L. and Mao, Ho-kwang and Eng, Peter J. and Trainor, Thomas P . and Newville, Matthew and Kao, Chi-chang and Heinz, Dion L. and Shu, Jinfu and Meng, Y ue and Hemley, Russell J., Bonding changes in compressed superhard graphite, Science 302 (2003) 425–427

    work page 2003

  6. [6]

    Q. Song, B. Wang, K. Deng, X. Feng, M. Wagner, J. D. Gale, K. Mullen, L. Zhi, Graphenylene, a unique two-dimensional carbon network with nondelocalized cyclohexatriene units, J. Mater. Chem. C 1 (2013) 38–41

    work page 2013

  7. [7]

    B. R. Sharma, A. Manjanath, A. K. Singh, pentahexoctite: A new two-dimensional allotrope of carbon, Scientific reports 4 (2014)

    work page 2014

  8. [8]

    Wang, X.-F

    Z. Wang, X.-F. Zhou, X. Zhang, Q. Zhu, H. Dong, M. Zhao, A. R. Oganov, Phagraphene: A low-energy graphene allotrope composed of 5–6–7 carbon rings with distorted dirac cones, Nano Lett. 15 (2015) 6182–6186

    work page 2015

Show all 38 references
  1. [9]

    Yin, Y .-P

    W.-J. Yin, Y .-P . Chen, Y .-E. Xie, L.-M. Liu, S. Zhang, A low- surface energy carbon allotrope: the case for bcc-C6, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 17 (2015) 14083–14087

    2015

  2. [10]

    B. Ram, H. Mizuseki, Tetrahexcarbon: A two-dimensional al- lotrope of carbon, Carbon 137 (2018) 266–273

    2018

  3. [11]

    C 568: A new two-dimensional sp 2-sp3 hybridized allotrope of carbon, Carbon 158 (2020) 827–835

    2020

  4. [12]

    Lavini, M

    F. Lavini, M. Rejhon, E. Riedo, Two-dimensional diamonds from sp 2-to-sp3 phase transitions, Nat. Rev. Mater. 7 (2022) 814–832

    2022

  5. [13]

    A. H. Castro Neto, F. Guinea, N. M. R. Peres, K. S. Novoselov, A. K. Geim, The electronic properties of graphene, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81 (2009) 109–162

    2009

  6. [14]

    J. O. Sofo, A. S. Chaudhari, G. D. Barber, Graphane: A two- dimensional hydrocarbon, Phys. Rev. B 75 (2007) 153401

    2007

  7. [16]

    D. C. Elias, R. R. Nair, T. M. G. Mohiuddin, S. V . Morozov, P . Blake, M. P . Halsall, A. C. Ferrari, D. W. Boukhvalov, M. I. Katsnelson, A. K. Geim, K. S. Novoselov, Control of graphene’s properties by reversible hydrogenation: Evidence for graphane, Science 323 (2009) 610–613

    2009

  8. [17]

    L. A. Chernozatonskii, P . B. Sorokin, A. G. Kvashnin, D. G. Kvashnin, Diamond-like C 2H nanolayer, diamane: Simulation of the structure and properties, JETP Letters 90 (2009) 134–138

    2009

  9. [18]

    P . V . Bakharev, M. Huang, M. Saxena, S. W. Lee, S. H. Joo, S. O. Park, J. Dong, D. C. Camacho-Mojica, S. Jin, Y . Kwon, M. Biswal, F. Ding, S. K. Kwak, Z. Lee, R. S. Ruoff, Chemically induced transformation of chemical vapour deposition grown bi- layer graphene into fluorinate...

    2020

  10. [19]

    A. G. Kvashnin, P . V . Avramov, D. G. Kvashnin, L. A. Cher- nozatonskii, P . B. Sorokin, Features of electronic, mechanical, and electromechanical properties of fluorinated diamond films of nanometer thickness, J. Phys. Chem. C 121 (2017) 28484– 28489

    2017

  11. [20]

    Clark, K.-J

    S. Clark, K.-J. Jeon, J.-Y . Chen, C.-S. Y oo, Few-layer graphene under high pressure: Raman and X-ray di ffraction studies, Solid 11 State Commun. 154 (2013) 15–18

    2013

  12. [21]

    R. R. Nair, W. Ren, R. Jalil, I. Riaz, V . G. Kravets, L. Brit- nell, P . Blake, F. Schedin, A. S. Mayorov, S. Y uan, M. I. Kat- snelson, H.-M. Cheng, W. Strupinski, L. G. Bulusheva, A. V . Okotrub, I. V . Grigorieva, A. N. Grigorenko, K. S. Novoselov, A. K. Geim, Fluorographe...

    2010

  13. [22]

    W. Li, J. Carrete, N. A. Katcho, N. Mingo, ShengBTE: A solver of the Boltzmann transport equation for phonons, Com- put. Phys. Commun. 185 (2014) 1747–1758

    2014

  14. [23]

    Kresse, J

    G. Kresse, J. Furthm ¨uller, E fficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set, Comput. Mater. Sci. 6 (1996) 15 – 50

    1996

  15. [24]

    Kresse, J

    G. Kresse, J. Furthm ¨uller, E fficient iterative schemes for ab ini- tio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set, Phys. Rev. B 54 (1996) 11169–11186

    1996

  16. [25]

    P . E. Bl ¨ochl, Projector augmented-wave method, Phys. Rev. B 50 (1994) 17953–17979

    1994

  17. [26]

    Kresse, D

    G. Kresse, D. Joubert, From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method, Phys. Rev. B 59 (1999) 1758–1775

    1999

  18. [27]

    H. J. Monkhorst, J. D. Pack, Special points for brillouin-zone integrations, Phys. Rev. B 13 (1976) 5188–5192

    1976

  19. [28]

    A. Togo, I. Tanaka, First principles phonon calculations in ma- terials science, Scr. Mater. 108 (2015) 1–5

    2015

  20. [29]

    Grimme, Semiempirical GGA-type density functional con- structed with a long-range dispersion correction, J

    S. Grimme, Semiempirical GGA-type density functional con- structed with a long-range dispersion correction, J. Comput. Chem. 27 (2006) 1787–1799

    2006

  21. [30]

    Topsakal, S

    M. Topsakal, S. Cahangirov, S. Ciraci, The response of mechan- ical and electronic properties of graphane to the elastic strain, Appl. Phys. Lett. 96 (2010) 091912

    2010

  22. [31]

    Raeisi, B

    M. Raeisi, B. Mortazavi, E. V . Podryabinkin, F. Shojaei, X. Zhuang, A. V . Shapeev, High thermal conductivity in semi- conducting janus and non-janus diamanes, Carbon 167 (2020) 51–61

    2020

  23. [32]

    L. Zhu, W. Li, F. Ding, Giant thermal conductivity in diamane and the influence of horizontal reflection symmetry on phonon scattering, Nanoscale 11 (2019) 4248–4257

    2019

  24. [33]

    Mortazavi, F

    B. Mortazavi, F. Shojaei, T. Rabczuk, X. Zhuang, High tensile strength and thermal conductivity in BeO monolayer: A first- principles study, FlatChem 28 (2021) 100257

    2021

  25. [34]

    H. Xie, W. Y u, W. C. and, MgO nanofluids: higher thermal conductivity and lower viscosity among ethylene glycol-based nanofluids containing oxide nanoparticles, J. Exp. Nanosci. 5 (2010) 463–472

    2010

  26. [35]

    H. Ying, A. Moore, J. Cui, Y . Liu, D. Li, S. Han, Y . Y ao, Z. Wang, L. Wang, S. Chen, Tailoring the thermal transport properties of monolayer hexagonal boron nitride by grain size engineering, 2d Mater. 7 (2019) 015031

    2019

  27. [36]

    Zhang, D

    X. Zhang, D. Sun, Y . Li, G.-H. Lee, X. Cui, D. Chenet, Y . Y ou, T. F. Heinz, J. C. Hone, Measurement of Lateral and Inter- facial Thermal Conductivity of Single- and Bilayer MoS 2 and MoSe2 Using Refined Optothermal Raman Technique, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 7 (2015) 25923–25929

    2015

  28. [38]

    Mortazavi, F

    B. Mortazavi, F. Shojaei, B. Javvaji, M. Azizi, H. Zhan, T. Rabczuk, X. Zhuang, First-principles investigation of me- chanical, electronic and optical properties of H-, F- and Cl- diamane, Appl. Surf. Sci. 528 (2020) 147035

    2020

  29. [39]

    P . Zhu, S. Wang, X. Zhang, J. Zhao, W. Y u, H. Zhang, Mechani- cal properties of diamane kirigami under tensile deformation, J. Nanopart. Res. 26 (2024) 91

    2024

  30. [40]

    Piazza, K

    F. Piazza, K. Gough, M. Monthioux, P . Puech, I. Gerber, R. Wiens, G. Paredes, C. Ozoria, Low temperature, pressureless sp2 to sp 3 transformation of ultrathin, crystalline carbon films, Carbon 145 (2019) 10–22. 12 Supplementary Information BO-graphane and BO-diamane Babu Ram ∗...

    2019

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.