REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by
An analysis of capital market through the lens of integral transforms: exploring efficient markets and information asymmetry
T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash
Pith's one-line read An extended Fourier transform that preserves phase relationships can reveal when a stock's price cycles have been coupled by artificially planted information.
desk verdict Standard bispectrum, fresh application, but the leap from a spike in Infosys to artificially planted information is not supported by the evidence. read the letter →
The pith
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
The reading
What carries the argument
The load-bearing object is the extended Fourier transform, a bispectrum: $P(\omega_\alpha,\omega_\beta)=F(\omega_\alpha)F(\omega_\beta)F^*(\omega_\alpha+\omega_\beta)$, with $F$ the discrete Fourier transform of the time series and $F^*$ its complex conjugate. The product is large only when the phase of the mode at $\omega_\alpha+\omega_\beta$ equals the sum of the phases at $\omega_\alpha$ and $\omega_\beta$ (quadratic phase coupling); random phases average the product toward zero. A standard power spectrum $|F(\omega)|^2$ erases the phase relationship, which is why the paper's diagnostic can see interactions between cycles that an amplitude-only analysis misses.
What would settle it
Phase-randomize the Infosys price series or its returns by shuffling the phases of its Fourier components while keeping the amplitudes, then recompute the extended transform over many surrogates; if the surrogate ensemble shows the same spikes, the observed signature is not evidence of planted information. Alternatively, demonstrate that other NSE stocks with known corporate announcements produce the same bispectral spikes, which would undercut the claim that the Infosys pattern is unusual.
Extended reading notes
Core claim
The paper's load-bearing claim is Proposition 4: an extended integral transform can identify the surrogated phase information that would arise from artificially planted information, using raw stock-price data. The construction is the bispectrum $P(\omega_\alpha,\omega_\beta)=F(\omega_\alpha)F(\omega_\beta)F^*(\omega_\alpha+\omega_\beta)$, computed from the discrete Fourier transform of the raw price levels. On synthetic data the transform separates a mixture of independent random phases from a mixture with the locked relation $\theta_\gamma=\theta_\alpha+\theta_\beta$, while their power spectra are identical. Applied to NSE data, the transform yields spikes only for Infosys; the paper's Section 6 states that 'the cyclical pattern of Infosys is not independent' and that 'there is a possibility that information may have been artificially introduced into the price of Infosys stock either publicly or privately.'
Load-bearing premise
The load-bearing premise is that a bispectral spike in raw stock-price levels reliably indicates artificially planted information, rather than being produced by ordinary market microstructure, volatility clustering, or non-stationarity; the paper tests neither the spike's statistical significance nor its specificity against surrogate data.
Editorial extensions
If this is right
- A standard power spectrum can miss information structure that the phase-retaining transform reveals, so the method gives a way to see non-independent cyclical structure in price data without a fundamental pricing model.
- Among the ten stocks and the Nifty 50 index examined, only Infosys carries the bispectral signature, implying that its 2015–2022 price cycles are not an independent superposition of modes.
- If the signature is genuine, it suggests that someone holding the planted information could partially predict Infosys price moves, which would contradict strong-form market efficiency.
- The diagnostic can be run on any tick-level price series without estimating fundamental values, making it a candidate screening tool for potential information manipulation.
Reading between the lines
- As an extension of the paper's argument, the transform detects quadratic phase coupling, but the inference from a spike to artificially planted information is not forced: volatility clustering, bid–ask bounce, and other nonlinear microstructure can also generate phase coupling, and the paper does not test against phase-randomized surrogates.
- As an extension, applying the same transform to returns or log-prices rather than raw price levels would show whether the Infosys signature is a feature of the return process or an artifact of the price level.
- As a testable extension, benchmarking the method on stocks around known corporate events—earnings announcements, insider trading cases, or settled manipulation episodes—would calibrate the spike magnitude and location that actually correspond to planted information.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The paper proposes a bispectral extension of the Fourier transform, defined in Eq. (3) as P(ωα, ωβ) = F(ωα)F(ωβ)F*(ωα+ωβ), to detect phase coupling between frequency components of stock prices. The authors construct two synthetic signals, one with independent phases and one with a phase-locked third frequency, and show that the bispectrum produces peaks only in the phase-locked case. They then apply the method to 1-minute NSE tick data for ten stocks and the Nifty 50 index over 2015-2022, reporting that only Infosys exhibits a bispectral spike. The paper interprets this spike as suggesting that information may have been artificially introduced, publicly or privately, into Infosys's price.
Significance. If the empirical inference were properly supported, the paper would demonstrate a novel application of higher-order spectral analysis to financial markets and could be a stepping stone for studying nonlinear phase interactions in price dynamics. The method itself is not circular: it uses a standard bispectrum definition and tests it on synthetic signals. The synthetic forward benchmark is a reasonable proof-of-concept. However, the paper's central empirical finding is unsupported by the analysis as presented, because the real-data inference lacks stationarity treatment, surrogate testing, and significance thresholds, and because the synthetic benchmark does not establish the converse mapping from peaks to planted information.
major comments (4)
- [§5.1, Eq. (3)] The frequency relation in the synthetic construction, 1/ωγ = 1/ωα + 1/ωβ, is inconsistent with the bispectrum definition in Eq. (3), which evaluates the product F(ωα)F(ωβ)F*(ωα+ωβ). For a peak to appear at (ωα, ωβ), the third component must be at frequency ωα + ωβ, not at ωγ = ωαωβ/(ωα+ωβ). As written, the synthetic dataset would not be expected to produce a bispectral peak, so the benchmark does not validate the method. If the intended relation is ωγ = ωα + ωβ, the formulas in Section 5.1 and Annexure I need to be corrected; if not, the claimed demonstration in Figure 1 is unexplained.
- [§5.3, §6, Figure 12] The real-data analysis is performed on raw price levels, which are non-stationary over the 2015-2022 sample: they contain trends, time-varying volatility, and heavy-tailed fluctuations. The bispectrum is a higher-order spectrum that is meaningful for stationary processes; applying it directly to raw price levels can produce apparent phase coupling from non-stationarity alone. The paper does not report detrending, a log-return transformation, or any stationarity diagnostic before computing the bispectrum.
- [§6] The Infosys result is interpreted without any statistical significance assessment. There is no surrogate-data ensemble, no confidence interval, no significance threshold, and no comparison with a null model of independent or linearly filtered noise. Under ordinary market microstructure, volatility clustering, and non-stationarity, bispectral spikes can arise even in the absence of any 'planted' phase information. The statement that 'information may have been artificially introduced' is therefore indistinguishable from the null hypothesis.
- [§4, Proposition 4] Proposition 4 claims the transform can 'identify the surrogated phase information due to artificially planted information from the raw stock data.' The synthetic test in Section 5.1 establishes only the forward direction: a signal in which a third mode is deliberately constructed with phase θγ = θα + θβ produces a peak. The real-data inference requires the converse: any bispectral peak indicates planted information. The converse is not proven, and given the non-stationarity and microstructure of financial prices, it is not a reasonable default assumption.
minor comments (4)
- [§5.1] The third term in the synthetic signals is written as cos(ωγ + θγ) rather than cos(ωγ t + θγ); the time argument is missing.
- [Throughout] The surname 'Malkiel' is misspelled as 'Makiel' in several places (e.g., the abstract and the reference to Malkiel 1989).
- [§6] Figure callouts are incomplete: the text refers to 'Figure 12' and 'Figure 1(B)' but many intermediate figures (Figures 2-11) are not cited in the text; please add explicit references to all figures.
- [Annexure I] The turbulence analogy at the end of Annexure I is not connected to the financial analysis or to any formal market model; it should either be integrated into the methodology or removed to avoid confusion.
Circularity Check
No circularity: the bispectrum P(ωα,ωβ) is defined independently and benchmarked on synthetic signals; the Infosys interpretation is empirically unsupported but not equivalent to the method's input by construction.
full rationale
The paper's proposed quantity P(ωα,ωβ)=F(ωα)F(ωβ)F*(ωα+ωβ) (Eq. 3) is the standard bispectrum, defined independently of the financial conclusion and attributed to Kim & Powers (1979). The synthetic test in Sections 5.1–5.2 constructs one signal with independent phases and one with the explicit phase constraint θγ=θα+θβ, and verifies that only the constrained signal produces peaks; this is a forward consistency check, not a fitted prediction. No parameter is estimated from the NSE data and then relabeled as a finding. The numerous Mukherjee self-citations concern the TARA simulation framework used as a computational tool; they are not load-bearing for the bispectrum identity or for the stock-market claim, since the bispectrum is benchmarked externally. The Section 6 inference from the Infosys bispectral peak to 'information may have been artificially introduced' is a logical converse that the paper does not establish (no detrending, surrogate ensemble, or significance threshold is provided), but that is an evidentiary or validity gap, not a circular reduction: the peak is not defined to be equivalent to planted information in Eq. 3. One ancillary defect is that the Annexure asserts prior use of the method with citations '(Kumar, 2019) (Kumar, 2018)' that do not appear in the reference list; this is missing bibliographic support and does not contribute to circularity. Overall, the derivation chain is self-contained and no step reduces to its own input by construction.
Assumptions & free parameters
assumptions (4)
- domain assumption The discrete Fourier transform can be applied to raw (non-stationary) price levels without returns transformation or detrending.
- ad hoc to paper Bispectral spikes in price data are evidence of artificially planted information rather than endogenous market dynamics.
- ad hoc to paper The synthetic dataset with theta_gamma = theta_alpha + theta_beta is a sufficient benchmark for the real-data inference.
- standard math The bispectrum definition in Equation 3 correctly encodes quadratic phase coupling for deterministic sinusoids.
Cite this review
Pith. "Pith review of An analysis of capital market through the lens of integral transforms: exploring efficient markets and information asymmetry." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/FQ5CMAWW
@misc{pith2026250606350,
author = {Pith},
title = {Pith review of: An analysis of capital market through the lens of integral transforms: exploring efficient markets and information asymmetry},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/FQ5CMAWW}},
note = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.06350}
}
read the original abstract
Post Modigliani and Miller (1958), the concept of usage of arbitrage created a permanent mark on the discourses of financial framework. The arbitrage process is largely based on information dissemination amongst the stakeholders operating in the financial market. The advent of the efficient market Hypothesis draws close to the M&M hypothesis. Giving importance to the arbitrage process, which effects the price discovery in the stock market. This divided the market as random and efficient cohort system. The focus was on which information forms a key factor in deciding the price formation in the market. However, the conventional techniques of analysis do not permit the price cycles to be interpreted beyond its singular wave-like cyclical movement. The apparent cyclic measurement is not coherent as the technical analysis does not give sustained result. Hence adaption of theories and computation from mathematical methods of physics ensures that these cycles are decomposed and the effect of the broken-down cycles is interpreted to understand the overall effect of information on price formation and discovery. In order to break the cycle this paper uses spectrum analysis to decompose and understand the above-said phenomenon in determining the price behavior in National Stock Exchange of India (NSE).
Figures
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Identification of phase correlations in Financial Stock Market Turbulence
Using the standard bispectrum rebranded as an extended Fourier transform, the paper claims Infosys stock prices show phase-coupled frequency modes while nine other NSE stocks and the Nifty 50 index do not.
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
Introduction and Theoretical Background. The stock market is a vital component of the economy, acting as a significant indicator of its overall health. The performance of companies, as reflected in their stock prices listed on various exchanges, is closely monitored by investors, leading to infor med investment decisions. Typically, rising stock prices si...
work page 2008
-
[2]
Research gap In reviewing the literature on stock data analysis, it became evident that the application of computational approaches, particularly those derived from mathematical physics, is surprisingly limited. This is noteworthy, given that such methods often yield superior results when examining price movements. The effectiveness of decomposing time se...
-
[3]
Research objective Considering the aspects of information asymmetry and market efficiency, this study aims to contribute to advancements in financial market analysis, particularly regarding how asymmetric information affects market behavior. The primary objective of this pap er is to explore the implications of information and the underlying causes of pri...
-
[4]
Stock prices show a cyclical pattern of movement. The movements are repetitive and hence a pattern analysis can lead to prediction of the market price rallies. Peters (1996) Sharma & Wongbangpo (2002) Akar & Bakaya (2011) Cootner (1962) (1986) Hirsh (2012)
work page 1996
-
[5]
If the price rallies are independent then some cyclical patterns will be formed in sequence. However, if a bias/information is planted through some artificial pattern, then a superposition of such frequency will be generated, with a surrogated ‘phase information’ hidden inside it
-
[6]
This will make the market predictive for the person who plants the bias artificially
Since standard integral transformations (for example Fourier-transformation) cannot distinguish the patterns generated from genuinely independent frequencies, and the patterns generated from the independent as well as biased frequencies, there is a chance that the biased frequencies have been planted artificially. This will make the market predictive for ...
-
[7]
In this work, we propose a n extended form of an integral transformation to identify the surrogated ‘phase information’ due to artificially planted information from the raw stock data, if there is any
-
[8]
The importance of such method is described in the Proposition section
Research Methods This study reports a new data analysis method to analyze phase-relationships between different frequencies. The importance of such method is described in the Proposition section. We provide a short tutorial of our analysis tool with some illustrative data first. Then we apply our tool for real stock market data. Given a function in time d...
work page 2015
Show all 59 references
-
[9]
In the first data set, where all Fourier modes are independent, no spikes are observed, indicating a lack of correlation betwee n the diverse modes
Results and Discussion Utilizing the extended Fourier transform to analyze two different simulated data sets reveals distinct outcomes when visualized. In the first data set, where all Fourier modes are independent, no spikes are observed, indicating a lack of correlation betw...
-
[10]
This study proposes a mathematical model called the Extended Fourier Transform (EFT)
Conclusion This article analyses the stock market and major stock prices using a mathematical physics approach, specifically the Fourier transform, which is commonly used in the field of physics. This study proposes a mathematical model called the Extended Fourier Transform (E...
-
[11]
Information asymmetry, R&D, and insider gains
Aboody, D, & Lev, B (2000). Information asymmetry, R&D, and insider gains. The journal of Finance, 55(6), 2747-2766
2000
-
[12]
K, & Wu, G (2006)
Aggarwal, R. K, & Wu, G (2006). Stock market manipulations. The Journal of Business, 79(4), 1915-1953
2006
-
[13]
Detecting the long -term cyclical behaviour of the Turkish stock market by means of spectral analysis
Akar, C, & Başkaya, Z (2011). Detecting the long -term cyclical behaviour of the Turkish stock market by means of spectral analysis
2011
-
[14]
B (1927)
Ashby, F. B (1927). Individual cycles in stock prices. Journal of Political Economy, 35(6), 835-851
1927
-
[15]
Aydogan, K, & Booth, G. G. (1988). Are there long cycles in common stock returns? Southern economic journal, 141-149
1988
-
[16]
Biswas, S., Ganesh, R., Mukherjee, R., & Sen, A. (2021). Quasi-recurrence: a new novel feature observed in 3d-magnetohydrodynamic plasmas. In 5th Asia-Pacific Conference on Plasma Physics
2021
-
[17]
Biswas, S., Mukherjee, R., Vydyanathan, N., & Ganesh, R. (2020). A numerical simulation of self-consistent dynamo using a new GPU-based 3D MHD solver
2020
-
[18]
J, & Yang, Z (2008)
Chan, K, Menkveld, A. J, & Yang, Z (2008). Information asymmetry and asset prices: Evidence from the China foreign share discount. The Journal of Finance, 63(1), 159-196
2008
-
[19]
T, Cooley, J
Cochran, W. T, Cooley, J. W, Favin, D. L, Helms, H. D, Kaenel, R. A, Lang, W. W, ... & Welch, P. D (1967). What is the fast Fourier transform? Proceedings of the IEEE, 55(10), 1664-1674
1967
-
[20]
H (1962)
Cootner, P. H (1962). Stock prices: Ra ndom vs. systematic changes. Industrial Management Review (pre - 1986), 3(2), 24
1962
-
[21]
Stock market forecasting
Cowles, A (1944). Stock market forecasting. Econometrica, Journal of the Econometric Society, 206-214
1944
-
[22]
Computational intelligence techniques for trading and investment
Dunis, C, Likothanassis, S, Karathanasopoulos, A, Sermpinis, G, & Theofilatos, K (2014). Computational intelligence techniques for trading and investment. London: Routledge
2014
-
[23]
F (1970)
Fama, E. F (1970). Efficient capital markets. Journal of finance, 25(2), 383-417
1970
-
[24]
F (1995)
Fama, E. F (1995). Random walks in stock market prices. Financial analysts journal, 51(1), 75-80
1995
-
[25]
F, & French, K
Fama, E. F, & French, K. R (2004). The capital asset pricing model: Theory and evidence. Journal of economic perspectives, 18(3), 25-46
2004
-
[26]
F, Fisher, L, Jensen, M
Fama, E. F, Fisher, L, Jensen, M. C, & Roll, R (1969). The adjustment of stock prices to new information. International economic review, 10(1), 1-21
1969
-
[27]
The effect of firm and stock characteristics on stock returns: Stock market crash analysis
Fauzi, R, & Wahyudi, I (2016). The effect of firm and stock characteristics on stock returns: Stock market crash analysis. The Journal of Finance and Data Science, 2(2), 112-124
2016
-
[28]
A (2003)
Griffioen, G. A (2003). Technical analysis in financial markets
2003
-
[29]
Gupta, A., Mukherjee, R., & Ganesh, R. (2019). Viscoelastic effects on asymmetric two‐dimensional vortex patterns in a strongly coupled dusty plasma. Contributions to Plasma Physics, 59(8), e201800189
2019
-
[30]
M, & Palepu, K
Healy, P. M, & Palepu, K. G (2001). Information asymmetry, corporate disclosure, and the capital markets: A review of the empirical disclosure literature. Journal of accounting and economics, 31(1-3), 405-440
2001
-
[31]
M, Alam, M
Idrees, S. M, Alam, M. A, & Agarwal, P (2019). A prediction approach for stock market volatility based on time series data. IEEE Access, 7, 17287-17298
2019
-
[32]
P (2021)
Kumar, G, Jain, S, & Singh, U. P (2021). Stock market forecasting using computational intelligence: A survey. Archives of computational methods in engineering, 28(3), 1069-1101
2021
-
[33]
J, & Maskin, E
Laffont, J. J, & Maskin, E. S (1990). The efficient market hypothesis and insider trading on the stock market. Journal of Political Economy, 98(1), 70-93
1990
-
[34]
A (1967)
Levy, R. A (1967). The theory of random walks: A survey of findings. The American Economist, 11(2), 34- 48
1967
-
[35]
W, & Bastos, G
Li, A. W, & Bastos, G. S (2020). Stock market forecasting using deep learning and technical analysis: a systematic review. IEEE access, 8, 185232-185242
2020
-
[36]
G (1989)
Malkiel, B. G (1989). Efficient market hypothesis. In Finance (pp. 127-134). London: Palgrave Macmillan UK
1989
-
[37]
A century of corporate takeovers: What have we learned and where do we stand? Journal of Banking & Finance, 32(10), 2148-2177
Martynova, M, & Renneboog, L (2008). A century of corporate takeovers: What have we learned and where do we stand? Journal of Banking & Finance, 32(10), 2148-2177
2008
-
[38]
L, & Mulherin, J
Mitchell, M. L, & Mulherin, J. H (1994). The impact of public information on the stock market. The Journal of Finance, 49(3), 923-950
1994
-
[39]
Mukherjee, R. (2019). Turbulence, flows and magnetic field generation in plasmas using a magnetohydrodynamic model (Doctoral dissertation, PhD thesis, Ph. D. thesis (Institute for Plasma Research, India, 2019))
2019
-
[40]
Mukherjee, R., & Ganesh, R. (2018). Numerical relaxation of a 3D MHD Taylor -Woltjer state subject to abrupt expansion. arXiv preprint arXiv:1811.09803
2018 arXiv
-
[41]
Mukherjee, R., & Ganesh, R. (2019). Study of Dynamo Action in Three Dimensional Magnetohydrodynamic Plasma with Arnold-Beltrami-Childress Flow. arXiv preprint arXiv:1901.09610
2019 arXiv
-
[42]
Mukherjee, R., Ganesh, R., & Sen, A. (2018). Numerical study of driven 3d magnetohydrodynamics: dynamos and recurrences. In APS Division of Plasma Physics Meeting Abstracts (V ol. 2018, pp. BO8-004)
2018
-
[43]
Mukherjee, R., Ganesh, R., & Sen, A. (2019). Coherent nonlinear oscillations in magnetohydrodynamic plasma. Physics of Plasmas, 26(4)
2019
-
[44]
Mukherjee, R., Ganesh, R., & Sen, A. (2019). Nonlinear alfven waves and recurrences in 3d magnetohydrodynamics. In APS Division of Plasma Physics Meeting Abstracts (V ol. 2019, pp. JO4-013)
2019
-
[45]
Mukherjee, R., Ganesh, R., & Sen, A. (2019). Recurrence in three dimensional magnetohydrodynamic plasma. Physics of Plasmas, 26(2)
2019
-
[46]
(2018, December)
Mukherjee, R., Ganesh, R., Saini, V ., Maurya, U., Vydyanathan, N., & Sharma, B. (2018, December). Three dimensional pseudo -spectral compressible magnetohydrodynamic GPU code for astrophysical plasma simulation. In 2018 IEEE 25th International Conference on High Performance C...
2018
-
[47]
Mukherjee, R., Gupta, A., & Ganesh, R. (2019). Compressibility effects on quasistationary vortex and transient hole patterns through vortex merger. Physica Scripta, 94(11), 115005
2019
-
[48]
J, (1982)
Nussbaumer, H. J, (1982). The fast Fourier transform (pp. 80-111). Springer Berlin Heidelberg
1982
-
[49]
E (1996)
Peters, E. E (1996). Chaos and order in the capital markets: a new view of cycles, prices, and market volatility. John Wiley & Sons
1996
-
[50]
A (1973)
Ross, S. A (1973). Return, risk and arbitrage. Rodney L. White Center for Financial Research, The Wharton School, University of Pennyslvania
1973
-
[51]
Saikia, A., & Mukherjee, R. (2024). Towards a theory of hydromagnetic turbulence with higher order fluid moments. arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.19704
2024 arXiv
-
[52]
C, & Wongbangpo, P (2002)
Sharma, S. C, & Wongbangpo, P (2002). Long -term trends and cycles in ASEAN stock markets. Review of Financial Economics, 11(4), 299-315
2002
-
[53]
S, Bongale, A
Sonkavde, G, Dharrao, D. S, Bongale, A. M, Deokate, S. T, Doreswamy, D, & Bhat, S. K (2023). Forecasting stock market prices using machine learning and deep learning models: A systematic review, performance analysis and discussion of implications. International Journal of Fina...
2023
-
[54]
E (1981)
Stiglitz, J. E (1981). Information and capital markets (No. w0678). National Bureau of Economic Research
1981
-
[55]
Are stock markets really efficient? Evidence of the adaptive market hypothesis
Urquhart, A, & McGroarty, F (2016). Are stock markets really efficient? Evidence of the adaptive market hypothesis. International Review of Financial Analysis, 47, 39-49
2016
-
[56]
N (2012)
Vlastakis, N, & Markellos, R. N (2012). Information demand and stock market volatility. Journal of Banking & Finance, 36(6), 1808-1821
2012
-
[57]
Digital Bispectral Analysis and Its Applications to Nonlinear Wave Interactions,
Y . C. Kim and E. J. Powers, "Digital Bispectral Analysis and Its Applications to Nonlinear Wave Interactions," in IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 120 -131, June 1979, doi: 10.1109/TPS.1979.4317207 Annexure I
1979
-
[58]
ingredients
FOURIER TRANSFORM((FT) 𝐹(𝜔) = 1 √2𝜋 ∫ 𝑓(𝑡)𝑒𝑖𝜔𝑡∞ −∞ 𝑑𝑡 ……………… Equation 1 Here f(t)= original function / signal. F(ω)= Result of Fourier transform which tells us how much of each frequency (ω) is present in the signal 𝑒𝑖𝜔𝑡 is a way of representing waves (it combines sine & cosin...
-
[59]
EXTENDED FOURIER TRANSFORM In this study, we will construct a new quantity as 𝑃(𝜔𝛼 , 𝜔𝛽) = 𝐹(𝜔𝛼)𝐹(𝜔𝛽)𝐹 ∗ (𝜔𝛼 + 𝜔𝛽) Here we multiply two different Fourier components 𝐹(𝜔𝛼) and 𝐹(𝜔𝛽) and then multiply the result by the complex conjugate of the Fourier modes at the frequency (𝜔𝛼 ...
2019
Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.