Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 75 references

Machine Learning-Assisted Analysis of Combustion and Ignition in As-milled and Annealed Al/Zr Composite Powders

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Ball-milled Al/Zr powders owe easy ignition to intermetallic heat, but not their burn performance.

desk verdict Solid systematic dataset, but the atomized-powder extrapolation rests on a size-biased comparison. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.06364 v1 pith:4LWMUC67 submitted 2025-06-03 cond-mat.mtrl-sci physics.chem-ph

Michael R. Flickinger , Sreenivas Raguraman , Amee L. Polk , Colin Goodman , Megan Bokhoor , Rami Knio , Michael Kruppa , Mark A. Foster
show 1 more author
Timothy P. Weihs
This is my paper
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sciphysics.chem-ph
keywords Al/Zrcompositepowdersballmillingintermetallicformationignitionthresholdannealedcombustiontemperaturehyperspectralimagingmicroexplosiondetection
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks whether the exothermic intermetallic reaction heat that makes ball-milled Al/Zr powders easy to ignite is also necessary for them to burn well. By annealing three stoichiometries to progressively consume that heat, it shows that ignition thresholds rise as heat is removed—sharply for the Al-rich 3Al:Zr powder, barely for the Zr-rich Al:3Zr powder—while combustion temperatures stay high and in some cases rise. Annealed powders with pre-formed intermetallics burned at average temperatures of 2400–3000 K, with maximum temperatures 100–400 K higher, and microexplosion frequencies remained above 46 percent. The central conclusion is that homogeneous Al/Zr powders, such as atomized powders, may need more energy to ignite but can match or surpass the combustion performance of as-milled composites once ignited. If true, scalable atomization becomes a viable manufacturing route for reactive Al/Zr powders.

What carries the argument

The central machinery is a systematic annealing ladder that progressively consumes the exothermic intermetallic formation reactions while holding composition and starting microstructure fixed, so that the remaining available heat is the controlled variable. Ignition is quantified with hot-wire tests in air, Ar+O2, and Ar+N2, and the resulting fast-heating ignition temperatures are converted to slow-heating equivalents through a Kissinger analysis that assumes an activation energy of 231.58 kJ/mol for Zr intermixing into Al. Combustion is characterized by SHEAR, a snapshot hyperspectral imager that tracks individual burning particles and fits their emission spectra to obtain temperatures, together with a Kalman-filter and Hungarian-algorithm multi-object tracker and three convolutional neural networks that classify microexplosion events from image sequences around each particle's last known location. These tools together connect the amount of intermetallic heat removed to ignition thresholds, combustion temperatures, burn durations, and microexplosion frequency.

What would settle it

Run slow-heating ignition experiments, for example differential thermal analysis at about 0.33 °C/s, on each as-milled chemistry and compare the onset of exothermic heat release with the ignition temperatures predicted by the Kissinger analysis; if ignition occurs before measurable intermetallic heat release or at temperatures inconsistent with the assumed activation energy, the claim that intermetallic heat drives ignition would fail. A more direct check is to measure the intermixing activation energy for each ball-milled powder independently and redo the Kissinger conversion.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the heat released by Zr intermixing and Al-Zr intermetallic formation controls ignition thresholds but not the quality of combustion in Al/Zr composite powders. Using three ball-milled chemistries (3Al:Zr, Al:Zr, Al:3Zr) annealed in argon to remove 0–100 percent of the available intermetallic heat, the authors show that ignition thresholds rise systematically as heat is removed—from 354–444 °C in as-milled powders to values that can exceed the hot-wire limit of roughly 900 °C for Al-rich compositions. Zr-rich powders continue to ignite after full heat removal because oxidation through fast-diffusing ZrO2 takes over as the ignition driver. Despite this loss of the heat that drives ignition, annealed powders burned at temperatures comparable to or higher than their as-milled counterparts, with average temperatures increasing by 500–600 K for the 3Al:Zr and Al:3Zr powders, and microexplosion frequency remaining high and often increasing. The authors conclude that pre-formed intermetallics do not degrade combustion performance, which is the key evidence supporting atomized Al/Zr powders as a scalable manufacturing alternative.

Load-bearing premise

The mechanistic claim that intermetallic heat release, not oxidation, drives ignition depends on assuming that a single rate-versus-temperature constant measured in aluminum-rich multilayer foils also describes atomic mixing in all three ball-milled powders; if those powders mix at different rates, that specific attribution is not proven, though the direct trend of rising ignition thresholds after annealing would still stand.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Removing intermetallic heat by annealing is a tunable lever: it raises ignition thresholds most for Al-rich powders and least for Zr-rich powders, so ignition sensitivity can be engineered by composition and heat treatment.
  • Oxidation becomes the dominant ignition mechanism once intermetallic heat is exhausted, which explains why Zr-rich powders retain ignitability while Al-rich powders fail off the hot wire.
  • Atomized Al/Zr powders with pre-formed intermetallic phases, which are cheaper and more scalable to produce than ball-milled composites, are credible replacements if the higher ignition threshold can be met by the application.
  • Combustion temperature and microexplosion frequency do not degrade when intermetallic phases form in advance, and for Al-rich and Zr-rich compositions they improve with annealing.
  • Adding Zr lowers ignition thresholds, but beyond a certain content it does not further improve combustion temperature or burn duration, implying an optimal Al/Zr ratio exists for practical use.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper does not test atomized powders directly, but its logic implies that the main barrier for atomized Al/Zr powders is igniter energy, not combustion quality; a follow-up comparing annealed and true atomized powders of matched size would test this directly.
  • The CNN microexplosion classifier was trained on more than 10,000 images and appears transferable, but its accuracy on substantially different chemistries, particle sizes, or camera settings is an open question that could be checked by cross-dataset validation.
  • The observed 500–600 K rise in combustion temperature for annealed 3Al:Zr and Al:3Zr powders is not mechanistically explained in the paper; it may reflect oxidation of specific intermetallic phases such as Al2Zr, which the authors note oxidizes at unusually low temperatures, rather than a general annealing effect.
  • The absence of a correlation between microexplosion frequency and burn duration is based on mean-diameter normalization; a size-resolved analysis could reveal a relationship that this averaging hides.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper synthesizes three ball-milled Al/Zr composite powders (3Al:Zr, Al:Zr, Al:3Zr), anneals them in argon to progressively consume the available intermetallic formation enthalpy, and measures ignition thresholds by hot-wire tests plus single-particle combustion temperatures, burn durations, and microexplosion frequencies using a SHEAR hyperspectral imaging system with CNN-based microexplosion detection. The reported trends are that annealing raises ignition thresholds, most strongly for Al-rich compositions, while combustion temperatures after full annealing either increase or remain comparable to as-milled powders. The paper concludes that annealed powders with pre-formed intermetallics can match or surpass as-milled combustion performance and that atomized Al/Zr powders may therefore be a scalable manufacturing alternative.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the work offers a practical path toward scalable atomized Al/Zr energetic powders and provides a large, carefully collected dataset linking ignition thresholds, combustion temperatures, and microexplosion statistics across three chemistries and multiple annealing states. The direct measurements are a strength: ignition thresholds carry error bars from repeated trials, DTA/TGA experiments were run in triplicate, and the CNN microexplosion pipeline was trained on over 10,000 images. The paper also gives explicit caveats about particle-size bias and normalization assumptions. However, the headline comparison between as-milled and annealed combustion performance is confounded by particle-size selection, and the ignition-mechanism interpretation rests on an unvalidated activation energy; both points need to be addressed before the central conclusion is supported.

major comments (2)
  1. [§4.2.1; Table 3; Fig. 12] The central claim that annealed powders can match or surpass the combustion performance of as-milled powders is not established by the reported comparison. For 3Al:Zr, the annealed sample contributes only 106 burn-duration and 86 temperature particles versus 1201 and 984 for the as-milled sample, and the paper itself states in Section 4.2.1 that these annealed particles are "likely the small end of the size distribution." Because detection is brightness-threshold based, small particles must be hotter to be detected, so the +598 K average-temperature increase (3030 K vs 2432 K in Table 3) can be inflated by selection rather than by the presence of pre-formed intermetallics. In addition, the annealed powder size distributions were not remeasured after the 1000 °C anneal, yet Fig. 12(b) normalizes annealed burn durations by the as-milled mean diameter; if annealing changes particle size, the normalized duration comparison is miscalibrated. The paper should either remeasure the annealed size distributions, restrict the comparison to overlapping size classes, or explicitly present the performance claim as a hypothesis rather than a conclusion.
  2. [§4.1.1; Table 4; Fig. 14] The mechanistic conclusion that ignition is driven by intermixing/intermetallic heat release rather than oxidation depends on a Kissinger conversion that is not validated for these powders. Table 4 uses a single activation energy E_a = 231.58 kJ/mol taken from Fisher et al. [57] for Al-rich Al/Zr multilayer foils and applies it to all three ball-milled chemistries, including the Zr-rich Al:3Zr powder whose low-temperature intermixing signal is weak (Fig. 7). The conversion from hot-wire heating rates (~15,000–30,000 K/s) to the 0.33 °C/s DTA scale is exponential in E_a, so even a moderate error in the activation energy shifts the equivalent ignition temperatures in Table 4 by hundreds of degrees. Without independent measurement of E_a for these specific powders (e.g., variable-heating-rate DTA), the statement in the Conclusions that "ignition was driven by the exothermic heat release from intermixing and intermetallic formation" is stronger than the evidence supports; the direct annealing-versus-threshold trend would still stand.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§3.4; Table 3; Fig. 12(b)] The burn-duration normalization uses the as-milled mean diameter and an exponent n=2 from pure-Al diffusion-limited theory; Section 4.2.2 acknowledges that n and the proportionality constant a are not expected to be constant across chemistries, so the normalized durations in Table 3 and Fig. 12(b) should carry this caveat in the main text and figure caption as prominently as it appears in the discussion.
  2. [§2.2; §4.1.1] The wire-ignition heating rate is quoted as approximately 15,000–30,000 K/s, while the Kissinger conversion in Section 4.1.1 uses 0.33 °C/s; state explicitly which heating rate is used in the conversion and how the value 0.33 °C/s is obtained from the DTA scans.
  3. [§3.4; Supplementary Information S1.3] Since microexplosion percentages are a headline result, the main text should report at least the final test-set precision, recall, and F1 score of the CNN classifiers rather than referring the reader to the supplementary information for all performance metrics.
  4. [§3.3; Fig. 10] The description of air versus Ar+O2 ignition-threshold differences for Al:Zr powders (up to 70 °C, with the direction depending on annealing state) is hard to follow; a compact table or a more explicit statement of which samples show lower thresholds in which environment would improve clarity.
  5. [Throughout] Sample names and table entries use inconsistent formatting, e.g., "3Al:Zr 1000C" in Table 3 versus "1000 °C" in the text; unify the notation for annealing temperatures.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

Kissinger-based mechanism validation is partially self-referential, but the central combustion and annealing comparisons are independent experimental results.

  1. self definitional [Section 4.1.1, Kissinger analysis (Table 4 and Figure 14)]
    "To validate that heat released from intermixing and intermetallic formation is the most important factor in driving ignition, we calculated equivalent ignition temperatures ... Zr intermixing into Al is thought to control the initial heat release and the activation energy for this intermixing was estimated to be 2.4 eV/atom (231.58 kJ/mol) based on studies done by Fisher et al. [57]. ..."

    The slow-heating 'equivalent ignition temperature' is obtained by Kissinger-shifting the measured wire-ignition temperature using Ea = 231.58 kJ/mol for Zr intermixing into Al. That shift is valid only if the rate-limiting ignition process is the very intermixing reaction whose activation energy was imported. The paper then places this constructed temperature on the DTA/TGA heat-release curves and concludes that oxidation/nitridation is negligible at ignition and that intermixing/intermetallic heat release drives ignition. The validation point is thus defined using the mechanism it is used to confirm, so the mechanistic conclusion is partly assumed by construction.

full rationale

The paper's central claims - that annealing raises ignition thresholds and that annealed powders can match or surpass as-milled combustion performance - rest on direct hot-wire ignition measurements, SHEAR/thermometry, burn-duration tracking, and CNN microexplosion counts. These are experimental observations, not quantities derived from the hypotheses they support. The combustion comparison has a sampling/particle-size confound that the paper itself acknowledges (annealed 3Al:Zr particles are 'likely the small end of the size distribution'), but that is a validity limitation, not circularity. The one partially circular step is the Section 4.1.1 Kissinger validation: the equivalent ignition temperature is computed using the activation energy for Zr intermixing, and then that same intermixing process is declared to drive ignition. This does not undermine the measured ignition-threshold trends, which stand independently, but it does mean the mechanistic attribution is not fully independently tested. The Fisher et al. activation energy is real external experimental data with overlapping authorship, so this is moderate partial circularity rather than a forced result.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on measured data plus a few imported modeling assumptions. The main free parameters are the activation energy used in the Kissinger analysis and the hand-chosen filtering thresholds; neither is fitted to the paper's own data, but both affect interpretation. No new physical entities are postulated.

free parameters (4)
  • Activation energy for Zr intermixing into Al (Ea) = 231.58 kJ/mol (2.4 eV/atom), taken from Fisher et al. [57]
    Used in Kissinger analysis (Section 4.1.1, Table 4) to convert wire-heating ignition thresholds into equivalent slow-heating ignition temperatures; the value originates from Al-rich Al/Zr multilayer foils, not ball-milled powders, and its transferability is assumed without validation for each chemistry.
  • Burn duration scaling exponent n = n = 2 for primary normalization; sensitivity checked for n = 0.5 to 2
    Used to normalize burn durations by particle diameter (Section 3.4, Figure 12b). The exponent is taken from diffusion-limited droplet theory for pure Al; the authors acknowledge it may not hold for condensed-phase burners, and they vary it in the supplementary information to test robustness.
  • Burn duration proportionality constant a = assumed constant across compositions
    In the sensitivity analysis (Section 4.2.2), a is assumed identical across chemistries; the authors acknowledge both a and n are expected to vary with chemistry.
  • Particle filtering thresholds = 1 ms lower, 30 ms upper
    Particles with burn duration below 1 ms or above 30 ms are excluded (Section 3.4, Table 3). These thresholds are hand-chosen and could bias microexplosion statistics and temperature distributions, particularly for the small annealed 3Al:Zr sample.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The activation energy for Zr intermixing in ball-milled Al/Zr powders equals that measured for Al-rich Al/Zr multilayer foils (2.4 eV/atom).
    Invoked in Section 4.1.1 for the Kissinger analysis that estimates equivalent ignition temperatures; no in-situ measurement or validation for the three ball-milled chemistries is provided.
  • domain assumption All mass gain up to 400 degrees Celsius in oxidizing or nitriding environments is due to ZrO2 or ZrN formation, respectively.
    Used in Section 4.1.1 to convert TGA mass gain into exothermic heat release; based on Wainwright et al. [32] and low-temperature phase stability, but Al oxidation is neglected in this window.
  • domain assumption The mean particle size from Horiba analysis represents the size distribution of particles that ignite and combust in the plasma.
    Used to normalize burn durations (Section 3.4); the authors note in-situ sizes are unavailable due to saturation and that selective ignition of smaller particles could bias results.
  • standard math Standard tracking and CNN training assumptions (Kalman filter, Hungarian algorithm, train/test split, focal loss) are valid for the video data.
    Section 2.3; these are standard algorithmic tools; no formal verification is claimed.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Machine Learning-Assisted Analysis of Combustion and Ignition in As-milled and Annealed Al/Zr Composite Powders." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/4LWMUC67

@misc{pith2026250606364,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Machine Learning-Assisted Analysis of Combustion and Ignition in As-milled and Annealed Al/Zr Composite Powders},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/4LWMUC67}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.06364}
}
read the original abstract

Micron-scale metal-based composite powders are promising for energetic applications due to their tailored ignition and combustion properties. In particular, ball-milled Al/Zr composites exhibit lower ignition thresholds than pure aluminum, driven by exothermic intermetallic formation reactions and have demonstrated enhanced combustion properties. However, the extent to which this heat release governs ignition and combustion remains unclear, especially when progressively removed through annealing. To systematically investigate this effect, we synthesized Al/Zr powders (3Al:Zr, Al:Zr, and Al:3Zr at%) via ball milling, annealed them in argon up to 1000 C to partially complete the formation reactions, and characterized their ignition and combustion behavior. Ignition thresholds were measured using a hot wire method across different environments, while high-speed hyperspectral imaging tracked single-particle burn durations and temperatures. A convolutional neural network (CNN)-based method was developed to quantify the frequency of microexplosions. Results show that annealing - and thus reducing available reaction heat - increases ignition thresholds, most significantly for Al-rich compositions. In contrast, Zr-rich powders exhibit little change in ignition thresholds due to oxidation aiding ignition. Despite removing the available heat that drives ignition, average combustion temperatures range from 2400-3000 K and increased with annealing for Al- and Zr-rich powders. Average maximum temperatures are 100 to 400 K higher. The frequency of microexplosions remains high (>46%) and increases with annealing for all but the Al-rich powders. These findings suggest that while homogeneous Al/Zr powders (e.g., atomized) may exhibit higher ignition thresholds, they can achieve comparable combustion performance once ignited.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.06364 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. A schematic showing the experimental setup used for combustion experiments. Note that the optics setup shown is not meant to be an exact representation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. (a) A schematic representation of the Kalman filter and Hungarian Algorithm approach employed to track particles in SHEAR videos. (b) Shows the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Frames before and after particle ID terminates due to the microexplosion of an Al:Zr as-milled particle. Frame 6 is the last frame before the particle [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (11 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Particle size distribution plots for the as-milled powders: 3Al:Zr (a), Al:Zr(e), and Al:3Zr (i). Secondary electron SEM images of loose powders and a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: X-ray diffraction patterns for as-milled and annealed samples for (a) 3Al:Zr, (b) Al:Zr, and (c) Al:3Zr. For each chemistry, samples are annealed to an intermediate temperature and to 1000 °C. 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: X-ray diffraction scans for the three as-milled powders from 30-47 degrees 2θ to show the Al and Zr peak shifts and the presence of ZrC. A dif￾ferent stoichiometric carbide is forming for 3Al:Zr, which is evident from the plot. 3.2. Thermal Analysis [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:f…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Results from DTA scans of as-milled powders in Ar. (a) Shaded error plots of DTA traces for each chemistry with baseline scans subtracted. (b) The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: The mass gain percentage versus temperature for as-milled powders run in Ar [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Wire ignition results in air for all as-milled and annealed samples. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Comparison of wire ignition thresholds in di [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: EDS of combustion products captured six inches above the plasma ignition source for 3Al:Zr (a-d), Al:Zr (e-h), and Al:3Zr (i-l) powders. Images in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: The (a) non-normalized and (b) normalized average burn durations for as-milled powders and ones scanned to 1000 °C for each chemistry. Plot (b) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Microexplosion frequency for all powders tested in the combustion [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: The heats of intermetallic heat release, oxidation, and nitridation were calculated using data from the DTA/ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_14.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

75 extracted references · 69 canonical work pages

  1. [57]

    Fisher, S

    K. Fisher, S. Barron, M. Bonds, R. Knepper, K. Livi, G. Campbell, N. Browning, T. Weihs, Phase transforma- tions, heat evolution, and atomic diffusion during slow heating of al-rich al/zr multilayered foils, J. Appl. Phys. (2013)

    work page 2013

  2. [1]

    N. H. Yen, L. Y . Wang, Reactive metals in explosives, Pro- pell. Explos. Pyrot. (2012) 143–155

    work page 2012

  3. [2]

    S. M. Peiris, N. Bolden-Frazier, Applications of reactive materials in munitions, Shock Phenomena in Granular and Porous Materials (2019) 165–191

    work page 2019

  4. [3]

    Camilleri, G

    E. Camilleri, G. Korza, L. Huesca-Espita, B. Setlow, D. Stamatis, P. Setlow, Mechanisms of killing of bacil- lus thuringiensis al hakam spores in a blast environment 17 with and without iodic acid, J. Appl. Microbiol. (2020) 1378–1389

    work page 2020

  5. [4]

    Dreizin, Phase changes in metal combustion, Prog

    E. Dreizin, Phase changes in metal combustion, Prog. En- erg. Combust. (2000) 57–78

    work page 2000

  6. [5]

    S. A. Grinshpun, M. Yermakov, R. Indugula, A. Abraham, M. Schoenitz, E. L. Dreizin, Aluminum-based materials for inactivation of aerosolized spores of bacillus anthracis surrogates, Aerosol. Sci. Tech. (2017) 224–234

    work page 2017

  7. [6]

    S. A. Grinshpun, A. Adhikari, M. Yermakov, T. Reponen, E. Dreizin, M. Schoenitz, V . Hoffmann, S. Zhang, Inacti- vation of aerosolized bacillus atrophaeus (bg) endospores and ms2 viruses by combustion of reactive materials, En- viron. Sci. Technol. (2012) 7334–7341

    work page 2012

  8. [7]

    Borah, M

    P. Borah, M. Alemohammad, M. Foster, T. P. Weihs, De- velopment of a dual-spectroscopic system to rapidly mea- sure diisopropyl methyl phosphonate (dimp) decomposi- tion and temperature in a reactive powder environment, Rev. Sci. Instrum. (2024)

    work page 2024

Show all 75 references
  1. [8]

    E. L. Dreizin, Metal-based reactive nanomaterials, Prog. Energ. Combust. (2009) 141–167

    2009

  2. [9]

    D. S. Sundaram, P. Puri, V . Yang, A general theory of igni- tion and combustion of nano-and micron-sized aluminum particles, Combust. Flame (2016) 94–109

    2016

  3. [10]

    Y . L. Shoshin, E. L. Dreizin, Particle combustion rates for mechanically alloyed al–ti and aluminum powders burn- ing in air, Combust. Flame (2006) 714–722

    2006

  4. [11]

    E. R. Wainwright, M. Inouye, M. Niu, K.-L. Chintersingh, T. P. Weihs, Comparing the ignition and combustion char- acteristics of ball-milled al-based composites with ti, zr, and mg additives, Journal of Energetic Materials (2023) 43–62

    2023

  5. [12]

    Y . Feng, L. Ma, Z. Xia, L. Huang, D. Yang, Ignition and combustion characteristics of single gas-atomized al– mg alloy particles in oxidizing gas flow, Energy (2020) 117036

    2020

  6. [13]

    X. Ma, W. Zhao, X. Zeng, S. Yan, D. Liu, F. Zhang, Q. Jiao, Spherical Al-Zr alloy powders prepared by cen- trifugal atomization for tunable energetic behavior, Mat. Lett. (2022) 131955

    2022

  7. [14]

    X. Zhu, M. Schoenitz, E. Dreizin, Mechanically alloyed al–li powders, J. Alloy. Compd. (2007) 111–115

    2007

  8. [15]

    W. Le, W. Zhao, Y . Zhu, X. Zeng, D. Liu, Q. Jiao, In-situ assembly of al-li-si alloy powders with enhanced thermal stability and tailored combustion, J. Alloy. Compd. (2023) 172270

    2023

  9. [16]

    E. B. Herbold, J. L. Jordan, N. Thadhani, Effects of pro- cessing and powder size on microstructure and reactiv- ity in arrested reactive milled al+ni, Acta Mater. (2011) 6717–6728

    2011

  10. [17]

    E. L. Dreizin, M. Schoenitz, Mechanochemically pre- pared reactive and energetic materials: a review, J. Mater. Sci. (2017) 11789–11809

    2017

  11. [18]

    Suryanarayana, Mechanical alloying: a novel tech- nique to synthesize advanced materials, Research (2019)

    C. Suryanarayana, Mechanical alloying: a novel tech- nique to synthesize advanced materials, Research (2019)

    2019

  12. [19]

    S. V . Lakshman, J. D. Gibbins, E. R. Wainwright, T. P. Weihs, The effect of chemical composition and milling conditions on composite microstructure and igni- tion thresholds of alzr ball milled powders, Powder Tech- nol. (2019) 87–94

    2019

  13. [20]

    S. V . Lakshman, J. D. Gibbins, T. P. Weihs, Evaluating the effect of microstructural refinement on the ignition of al- mg-zr ball-milled powders, Powder Technol. (2021) 447– 456

    2021

  14. [21]

    S. Q. Arlington, G. M. Fritz, T. P. Weihs, Exothermic for- mation reactions as local heat sources, Ann. Rev. Mater. Res. (2022) 219–248

    2022

  15. [22]

    Stamatis, E

    D. Stamatis, E. R. Wainwright, S. V . Lakshman, M. S. Kessler, T. P. Weihs, Combustion of explosively dispersed al-mg-zr composite particles, Combust. Flame (2020) 93– 102

    2020

  16. [23]

    E. R. Wainwright, S. V . Lakshman, A. F. Leong, A. H. Kinsey, J. D. Gibbins, S. Q. Arlington, T. Sun, K. Fezzaa, T. C. Hufnagel, T. P. Weihs, Viewing internal bubbling and microexplosions in combusting metal particles via x- ray phase contrast imaging, Combust. Flame (2019) 194– 203

    2019

  17. [24]

    T. A. Steinberg, D. B. Wilson, F. Benz, The combustion phase of burning metals, Combust. Flame (1992) 200– 208

    1992

  18. [25]

    J. L. McNanna, E. L. Dreizin, Disruptive events in com- bustion of metal particles, Fuel (2025) 133892

    2025

  19. [26]

    Nyashina, K

    G. Nyashina, K. Y . Vershinina, P. Strizhak, Impact of micro-explosive atomization of fuel droplets on relative performance indicators of their combustion, Fuel Process. Technol. (2020) 106334

    2020

  20. [27]

    K. Meng, L. Bao, F. Li, C. Wang, Q. Lin, Experimental understanding on combustion and micro-explosion char- acteristics of mixed droplets of aviation fuel, biodiesel and ethanol, J. Energy Inst. (2021) 169–179

    2021

  21. [28]

    J. Wang, F. Yang, J. Li, S. Shi, Y . Zhu, Effect of micro- explosion and puffing on combustion interactions of multi-component fuel droplet array during flame spread, Appl. Therm. Eng. (2025) 125113

    2025

  22. [29]

    F. Zhou, J. Wang, X. Zhou, X. Qiao, X. Wen, Effect of 2, 5-dimethylfuran concentration on micro-explosive com- bustion characteristics of biodiesel droplet, Energy (2021) 120228. 18

    2021

  23. [30]

    Y . Aly, E. L. Dreizin, Ignition and combustion of al· mg alloy powders prepared by different techniques, Combust. Flame (2015) 1440–1447

    2015

  24. [31]

    E. R. Wainwright, T. A. Schmauss, S. V . Lakshman, K. R. Overdeep, T. P. Weihs, Observations during al: Zr com- posite particle combustion in varied gas environments, Combust. Flame (2018) 487–499

    2018

  25. [32]

    E. R. Wainwright, T. P. Weihs, Microstructure and ignition mechanisms of reactive aluminum–zirconium ball milled composite metal powders as a function of particle size, J. Mater. Sci. (2020) 14243–14263

    2020

  26. [33]

    T. S. Ward, M. A. Trunov, M. Schoenitz, E. L. Dreizin, Experimental methodology and heat transfer model for identification of ignition kinetics of powdered fuels, Int. J. Heat Mass Tran. (2006) 4943–4954

    2006

  27. [34]

    Alemohammad, E

    M. Alemohammad, E. R. Wainwright, J. R. Stroud, T. P. Weihs, M. A. Foster, Kilohertz frame rate snapshot hyper- spectral imaging of metal reactive materials, Appl. Optics (2020) 10406–10415

    2020

  28. [35]

    Hameete, M

    J. Hameete, M. Abdallah, L. Thijs, T. Homan, X. Mi, N. Dam, L. de Goey, Particle-resolved hyperspectral pyrometry of metal particles, Combust. Flame (2024) 113435

    2024

  29. [36]

    F. Peng, H. Liu, W. Cai, Combustion diagnostics of metal particles: a review, Meas. Sci. & Technol. (2023) 042002

    2023

  30. [37]

    Goroshin, J

    S. Goroshin, J. Mamen, A. Higgins, T. Bazyn, N. Glumac, H. Krier, Emission spectroscopy of flame fronts in alu- minum suspensions, P. Combust. Inst. (2007) 2011–2019

    2007

  31. [38]

    M. Si, Q. Cheng, L. Yuan, Z. Luo, W. Yan, H. Zhou, Study on the combustion behavior and soot formation of sin- gle coal particle using hyperspectral imaging technique, Combust. Flame (2021) 111568

    2021

  32. [39]

    Huang, S

    J. Huang, S. Li, D. Sanned, L. Xu, S. Xu, Q. Wang, M. Stiti, Y . Qian, W. Cai, E. Berrocal, et al., A detailed study on the micro-explosion of burning iron particles in hot oxidizing environments, Combust. Flame (2022) 111755

    2022

  33. [40]

    Y . Zhou, Q. Mao, S. I. NG, Q. Chu, L. Liao, B. Shi, Fundamental investigation on the micro-explosion of aluminum-lithium alloy particle, Combust. Flame (2025) 113983

    2025

  34. [41]

    F. Peng, H. Liu, C. Kong, X. Mi, B. Tian, Y . Zheng, S. Xu, W. Cai, Micro-explosion of burning iron particles with carbon impurity, Combust. Flame (2025) 113974

    2025

  35. [42]

    S. A. Speakman, Profile Fitting for Analysis of XRPD Data using HighScore Plus v3, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge MA (2012). URL http://prism.mit.edu/XRAY/4%20Profile% 20Fitting%20for%20Quantitative%20Analysis.pdf

    2012

  36. [43]

    Raguraman, M

    S. Raguraman, M. S. Priyadarshini, T. Nguyen, R. Mc- Govern, A. Kim, A. J. Griebel, P. Clancy, T. P. Weihs, Machine learning-guided accelerated discovery of structure-property correlations in lean magnesium alloys for biomedical applications, J. Magn. Alloys (Jun. 2024). doi:1...

    2024 doi

  37. [44]

    A. L. Polk, S. W. Dean, M. R. Flickinger, A. C. Kerri- lee, D. G. Scott, E. R. Valdes, K. R. Fisher, T. P. Weihs, Identifying a combination of intermetallic and thermite re- actions that result in a non-expanding compact, Combust. Flame (2024) 113343

    2024

  38. [45]

    Bradski, The OpenCV Library, Dr

    G. Bradski, The OpenCV Library, Dr. Dobb’s Journal of Software Tools (2000)

    2000

  39. [46]

    Sahbani, W

    B. Sahbani, W. Adiprawita, Kalman filter and iterative- hungarian algorithm implementation for low complexity point tracking as part of fast multiple object tracking sys- tem, in: 2016 6th international conference on system en- gineering and technology (ICSET), IEEE, 2016, pp....

    2016

  40. [47]

    Ciaparrone, F

    G. Ciaparrone, F. L. Sánchez, S. Tabik, L. Troiano, R. Tagliaferri, F. Herrera, Deep learning in video multi- object tracking: A survey, Neurocomputing (2020) 61–88

    2020

  41. [48]

    Simonyan, A

    K. Simonyan, A. Zisserman, Very deep convolutional net- works for large-scale image recognition, arXiv preprint arXiv:1409.1556 (2014)

    2014 arXiv

  42. [49]

    LeCun, L

    Y . LeCun, L. Bottou, Y . Bengio, P. Haffner, Gradient- based learning applied to document recognition, P. IEEE (1998) 2278–2324

    1998

  43. [50]

    T.-Y . Lin, P. Goyal, R. Girshick, K. He, P. Dollár, Focal loss for dense object detection, in: Proc. CVPR. IEEE, 2017, pp. 2980–2988

    2017

  44. [51]

    D. P. Kingma, J. Ba, Adam: A method for stochastic opti- mization, arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980 (2014)

    2014 arXiv

  45. [52]

    Akiba, S

    T. Akiba, S. Sano, T. Yanase, T. Ohta, M. Koyama, Optuna: A next-generation hyperparameter optimization framework, in: Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery & data mining, 2019, pp. 2623–2631

    2019

  46. [53]

    Abadi, A

    M. Abadi, A. Agarwal, P. Barham, E. Brevdo, Z. Chen, C. Citro, G. S. Corrado, A. Davis, J. Dean, M. Devin, S. Ghemawat, I. Goodfellow, A. Harp, G. Irving, M. Is- ard, Y . Jia, R. Jozefowicz, L. Kaiser, M. Kudlur, J. Leven- berg, D. Mané, R. Monga, S. Moore, D. Murray, C. Olah,...

    2015

  47. [54]

    Chollet, et al., Keras, https://github.com/fchollet/keras (2015)

    F. Chollet, et al., Keras, https://github.com/fchollet/keras (2015)

    2015

  48. [55]

    A. L. Polk, A. C. Kerri-lee, M. R. Flickinger, E. R. Valdes, W. L. Gardner, T. P. Weihs, Effect of composition and process control agents on the microstructure and ignition properties of ball-milled Al-Zr powders, Powder Technol. (2023) 118729

    2023

  49. [56]

    Murray, A

    J. Murray, A. Peruzzi, J. Abriata, The Al-Zr (aluminum- zirconium) system, J. Phase Equilib. (1992) 277–291

    1992

  50. [58]

    Macikag, Enthalpy of formation of intermetallic phases from al–zr system determined by calorimetric solution method, J

    T. Macikag, Enthalpy of formation of intermetallic phases from al–zr system determined by calorimetric solution method, J. Ther. Anal. Calorim. (2018) 423–431

    2018

  51. [59]

    Paljevi ´c, High-temperature oxidation behaviour in the zr-al system, J

    M. Paljevi ´c, High-temperature oxidation behaviour in the zr-al system, J. Alloy. Compd. (1994) 119–126

    1994

  52. [60]

    W. Xin, Y . Deng, Y . Jiang, Y . Yuan, P. Wang, Phase evo- lution and oxidation characteristics of the nd–fe–b and ce–fe–b magnet scrap powder during the roasting process, High Temp. Mater. Proc. (2020) 477–488

    2020

  53. [61]

    Lynch, H

    P. Lynch, H. Krier, N. Glumac, A correlation for burn time of aluminum particles in the transition regime, P. Com- bust. Inst. (2009) 1887–1893

    2009

  54. [62]

    Wilson Jr, F

    R. Wilson Jr, F. Williams, Experimental study of the com- bustion of single aluminum particles in o2/ar, in: Symp. (Int.) Combust., Elsevier, 1971, pp. 833–845

    1971

  55. [63]

    M. W. Beckstead, Correlating aluminum burning times, Combust. Explos. Shock Waves (2005) 533–546

    2005

  56. [64]

    R. J. Gill, C. Badiola, E. L. Dreizin, Combustion times and emission profiles of micron-sized aluminum parti- cles burning in different environments, Combust. Flame (2010) 2015–2023

    2010

  57. [65]

    Swaminathan, M

    P. Swaminathan, M. Grapes, K. Woll, S. Barron, D. La- Van, T. Weihs, Studying exothermic reactions in the ni-al system at rapid heating rates using a nanocalorimeter, J. Appl. Phys. (2013)

    2013

  58. [66]

    Shu, Nonstoichiometric multicomponent nitride thin films, Ph.D

    R. Shu, Nonstoichiometric multicomponent nitride thin films, Ph.D. thesis, Linkoping University Electronic Press (2020)

    2020

  59. [67]

    Chase, M.W., NIST-JANAF Thermochemical Tables, Fourth Edition, American Institute of Physics, 1998

    J. Chase, M.W., NIST-JANAF Thermochemical Tables, Fourth Edition, American Institute of Physics, 1998

    1998

  60. [68]

    M. J. Balart, J. B. Patel, F. Gao, Z. Fan, Grain refine- ment of deoxidized copper, Metall. Mater. Trans. A (2016) 4988–5011

    2016

  61. [69]

    D. Prot, C. Monty, Self-diffusion inα–al2o3. ii. oxy- gen diffusion in ‘undoped’single crystals, Philos. Mag. A (1996) 899–917

    1996

  62. [70]

    Brossmann, R

    U. Brossmann, R. Würschum, U. Södervall, H.-E. Schae- fer, Oxygen diffusion in ultrafine grained monoclinic ZrO2, J. Appl. Phys. (1999) 7646–7654

    1999

  63. [71]

    Raguraman, A

    S. Raguraman, A. Kim, T. Ayodeji, A. J. Griebel, D. Ber- shadsky, T. Nguyen, T. P. Weihs, Simultaneous Opti- mization of Strength and Bio-Corrosion Resistance in Biodegradable ZX10 Magnesium Alloy via Thermome- chanical Processing and Annealing, J. Alloy. Compd (2025) 180078

    2025

  64. [72]

    Manara, H

    D. Manara, H. Jackson, C. Perinetti-Casoni, K. Boboridis, M. Welland, L. Luzzi, P. Ossi, W. Lee, The zrc–c eutec- tic structure and melting behaviour: A high-temperature radiance spectroscopy study, J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. (2013) 1349–1361

    2013

  65. [73]

    Badiola, R

    C. Badiola, R. J. Gill, E. L. Dreizin, Combustion char- acteristics of micron-sized aluminum particles in oxy- genated environments, Combust. Flame (2011) 2064– 2070

    2011

  66. [74]

    Badiola, E

    C. Badiola, E. L. Dreizin, Combustion of micron-sized particles of titanium and zirconium, P. Combust. Inst. (2013) 2237–2243

    2013

  67. [75]

    A. J. Lange, M. Sellier, J. N. Hewett, E. R. Wainwright, T. P. Weihs, Modelling bubble growth in a burning metal droplet, Combust. Flame (2022) 112434. 20

    2022

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.