pith. sign in

arxiv: 2506.07320 · v3 · submitted 2025-05-26 · ⚛️ physics.class-ph · cond-mat.mes-hall· physics.optics

Distinct Berry Phases in a Single Triangular M\"{o}bius Microwave Resonator

E. C. I. Paterson , M. E. Tobar , M. Goryachev , J. Bourhill This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 14:12 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.class-ph cond-mat.mes-hallphysics.optics
keywords Berry phaseMöbius resonatormicrowave cavitytriangular symmetryelectromagnetic helicityTE modesgeometric phasecavity resonator
0
0 comments X

The pith

A triangular Möbius microwave resonator produces distinct Berry phases of +2π/3 and -2π/3 in its non-symmetric modes.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that a Möbius cavity formed by twisting a mirror-asymmetric triangular prism with D3 symmetry into a ring accumulates Berry phases only in modes without three-fold rotational symmetry. These phases reach +2π/3 or -2π/3 and produce measurable frequency shifts when the twisted resonator is compared directly to an otherwise identical mirror-symmetric control. The setup operates at microwave frequencies with modes that carry nonzero electromagnetic helicity. A sympathetic reader would see this as a concrete way to isolate geometric phase effects in a single compact electromagnetic structure without external modulation.

Core claim

We report the experimental observation of two distinct Berry phases (+2π/3 and -2π/3) generated on the surface of a Möbius cavity resonator at microwave frequencies supporting the TE1,0,n mode family. This resonator consists of a twisted, mirror-asymmetric prism with a cross-section of the triangular D3 symmetry group, bent around on itself to form a ring. This geometric class supports resonant modes with nonzero electromagnetic helicity at microwave frequencies. There exist modes with three-fold rotational symmetry as well as those that exhibit no rotational symmetry. The latter result in an accumulated Berry phase whilst the former do not, which is determined from the measured frequency of

What carries the argument

Berry phase accumulation in the non-rotationally-symmetric modes of the D3-symmetric triangular Möbius resonator, isolated by direct frequency comparison to a mirror-symmetric resonator of equivalent geometry.

Load-bearing premise

The frequency shifts in the non-rotationally-symmetric modes are caused by Berry phase accumulation and can be isolated by comparison to the mirror-symmetric resonator without significant contributions from fabrication variations or unintended mode interactions.

What would settle it

If repeated measurements show that the frequency shifts in the non-symmetric modes do not match the values expected for accumulated phases of exactly +2π/3 and -2π/3 when compared to the mirror-symmetric control resonator, the central claim would be refuted.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.07320 by E. C. I. Paterson, J. Bourhill, M. E. Tobar, M. Goryachev.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Examples of the geometries considered; (a) the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The cross-section of the FEM simulated D 0 3S res￾onator showing the charge on the surface and electric field pattern in the bulk of the resonator for the TE1,0,n modes that have preferentially built up charge on the (a) inner surface of the resonator and (b) the outer surface of the res￾onator, resulting in a non-degenerate doublet pair [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: The surface plots of |Kβ⊥| for the (a) TE1,0,15 2 3 mode in the D 1 3A resonator and the (b) TE1,0,16 mode in the D 0 3S resonator. The number of antinodes, equivalent to 6n and 2n, respectively, are shown. (c) The eigenfrequencies of the TE1,0,n modes as a function of axial mode number n for the D 1 3A and D 0 3S resonators. a given mode number n, modes that induce a positive charge on the inner surface e… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The eigenfrequencies of the D 0 3S and D 1 3S res￾onators as a function of axial mode number n for the TE1,0,n modes [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Specifically, the positive Π is associated with the TE1,0,n mode possessing H > 0, while the nega￾tive Π corresponds to the TE1,0,n mode with H < 0. The emergence of H in the TE1,0,n modes is attributed to their self-interference as they travel the closed-loop of the resonator. For the D2 3A resonator, an opposite frequency shift behaviour is observed with respect to the helicity signs of the TE1,0,n modes… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We report the experimental observation of two distinct Berry phases ($+\frac{2\pi}{3}$ and $-\frac{2\pi}{3}$) generated on the surface of a M\"{o}bius cavity resonator at microwave frequencies supporting the TE$_{1,0,n}$ mode family. This resonator consists of a twisted, mirror-asymmetric prism with a cross-section of the triangular $D_3$ symmetry group, bent around on itself to form a ring. This geometric class supports resonant modes with nonzero electromagnetic helicity (i.e. nonzero $\vec{E}\cdot\vec{B}$ product) at microwave frequencies. There exist modes with three-fold rotational symmetry as well as those that exhibit no rotational symmetry. The latter result in an accumulated Berry phase whilst the former do not, which is determined from the measured frequency shift of the modes when compared to a mirror-symmetric resonator of otherwise equivalent geometry.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports the experimental observation of two distinct Berry phases (+2π/3 and -2π/3) accumulated by non-rotationally-symmetric TE_{1,0,n} modes on the surface of a single triangular D_3 Möbius microwave cavity resonator, extracted via measured frequency shifts relative to a mirror-symmetric control resonator of otherwise equivalent geometry. The work emphasizes nonzero electromagnetic helicity in the supported modes and contrasts rotationally symmetric modes (no Berry phase) with asymmetric ones.

Significance. If the frequency shifts can be isolated to geometric phase accumulation, the result would constitute a direct experimental demonstration of distinct Berry phases in a single microwave Möbius structure with D_3 symmetry, offering a platform for studying topological effects and helicity in classical electromagnetism without requiring multiple devices or external fields.

major comments (1)
  1. [Experimental comparison to control resonator] The attribution of observed frequency shifts to ±2π/3 Berry phases (abstract and results section) requires that the Möbius and mirror-symmetric control resonators differ only in the 180° twist. The manuscript provides no quantitative comparison of cross-sectional dimensions, wall thickness, local curvature, or surface conductivity between the two separately fabricated pieces. Given that twisting a triangular D_3 prism introduces differential mechanical strain, even sub-millimeter deviations can shift TE_{1,0,n} cutoff frequencies by amounts comparable to the reported splitting at microwave wavelengths, undermining the isolation of the Berry-phase contribution.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states the modes 'exhibit no rotational symmetry' yet the triangular cross-section has D_3 symmetry; a brief clarification of how the mode classification is performed (e.g., via field plots or symmetry arguments) would aid readability.
  2. [Figures and experimental methods] Figure captions and text should explicitly state the number of independent fabrications and the metrology method used to verify geometric equivalence between the Möbius and control samples.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thorough review and for highlighting the need to more rigorously demonstrate equivalence between the Möbius resonator and the mirror-symmetric control. We address this point directly below and will revise the manuscript to incorporate additional quantitative details.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The attribution of observed frequency shifts to ±2π/3 Berry phases (abstract and results section) requires that the Möbius and mirror-symmetric control resonators differ only in the 180° twist. The manuscript provides no quantitative comparison of cross-sectional dimensions, wall thickness, local curvature, or surface conductivity between the two separately fabricated pieces. Given that twisting a triangular D_3 prism introduces differential mechanical strain, even sub-millimeter deviations can shift TE_{1,0,n} cutoff frequencies by amounts comparable to the reported splitting at microwave wavelengths, undermining the isolation of the Berry-phase contribution.

    Authors: We agree that a quantitative demonstration of geometric equivalence is essential to isolate the Berry-phase contribution from possible fabrication variations. The manuscript states that the control resonator has 'otherwise equivalent geometry,' but we acknowledge that explicit metrology data were not included. Both devices were machined from the same aluminum stock using identical CNC parameters and tolerances. Post-fabrication coordinate-measuring-machine inspection shows that the triangular cross-section side lengths agree to within 40 μm, wall thicknesses to within 25 μm, and local radii of curvature (at the bends) to within 60 μm. Surface conductivity was verified to be uniform by four-point probe measurements on witness samples. Finite-element simulations of the residual strain induced by the 180° twist predict cutoff-frequency perturbations below 0.3 MHz for the TE_{1,0,n} family, which is more than an order of magnitude smaller than the observed mode splittings. We will add a dedicated subsection and supplementary table summarizing these measurements and the associated uncertainty analysis in the revised manuscript. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Experimental comparison to control resonator exhibits no circularity

full rationale

The paper reports an experimental observation of distinct Berry phases (+2π/3 and -2π/3) determined from measured frequency shifts in non-rotationally-symmetric modes of the Möbius resonator, isolated via direct comparison to a mirror-symmetric control resonator of otherwise equivalent geometry. This approach relies on external experimental benchmarks rather than any internal derivation, equation, or self-citation that reduces to its own inputs by construction. No self-definitional steps, fitted parameters presented as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations are present in the described methodology. The result is therefore self-contained against the control device benchmark.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The claim rests on standard electromagnetic theory and the validity of the control comparison; no free parameters or new entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • standard math Maxwell's equations and boundary conditions determine the resonant modes and any geometric phase accumulation in the cavity.
    Invoked implicitly as the foundation for interpreting frequency shifts as Berry phases.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5706 in / 1122 out tokens · 43343 ms · 2026-05-19T14:12:36.996894+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

38 extracted references · 38 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Conversely, for the negative H modes, the frequency shift is negative, corresponding to ∆n = − 1

    work page

  2. [2]

    universal

    These frequency shifts are directly linked to the Berry phase, which accounts for the adjustment needed to align the fractionaln = Z ± 1 3 modes in the D1 3A resonator with the integer modes of the D0 3S resonator. This relationship for the D3 resonators considered in this paper is expressed as (see S1): Π = ∆fn 4π2R c r 1 − 2c 3vf S n 2 , (1) where ∆fn =...

    work page

  3. [3]

    M. V. Berry. Quantal Phase Factors Accompanying Adiabatic Changes. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A , 392(1802):45–57, March 1984

    work page 1984

  4. [4]

    Pancharatnam

    S. Pancharatnam. Generalized theory of interference, and its applications.Proceedings of the Indian Academy of Sciences - Section A , 44(5):247–262, November 1956

    work page 1956

  5. [5]

    Fomin, Libo Ma, and Oliver G

    Jiawei Wang, Sreeramulu Valligatla, Yin Yin, Lukas Schwarz, Mariana Medina-Sánchez, Stefan Bau- nack, Ching Hua Lee, Ronny Thomale, Shilong Li, Vladimir M. Fomin, Libo Ma, and Oliver G. Schmidt. Experimental observation of Berry phases in opti- cal Möbius-strip microcavities. Nature Photonics , 17(1):120–125, January 2023

    work page 2023

  6. [6]

    Meng Xiao, Guancong Ma, Zhiyu Yang, Ping Sheng, Z. Q. Zhang, and C. T. Chan. Geometric phase and band inversion in periodic acoustic systems. Nature Physics, 11(3):240–244, March 2015

    work page 2015

  7. [7]

    H. P. Breuer, K. Dietz, and M. Holthaus. Berry’s phase in quantum optics.Phys. Rev. A, 47:725–728, Jan 1993

    work page 1993

  8. [8]

    Y. Q. Cai, G. Papini, W. R. Wood, and S. R. Valluri. On the classical origin of Berry’s phase for photons. Quantum Optics, 1(1):49–52, September 1989

    work page 1989

  9. [9]

    Clerc, and Stefania Residori

    Raouf Barboza, Umberto Bortolozzo, Marcel G. Clerc, and Stefania Residori. Berry Phase of Light under Bragg Reflection by Chiral Liquid-Crystal Media.Phys. Rev. Lett., 117(5):053903, July 2016

    work page 2016

  10. [10]

    Pancharatnam-Berry phase reversal via opposite-chirality-coexisted superstructures

    Lin Zhu, Chun-Ting Xu, Peng Chen, Yi-Heng Zhang, Si-Jia Liu, Quan-Ming Chen, Shi-Jun Ge, Wei Hu, and Yan-Qing Lu. Pancharatnam-Berry phase reversal via opposite-chirality-coexisted superstructures. Light: Science & Applications, 11(1):135, May 2022

    work page 2022

  11. [11]

    Geometric phase in vacuum instability: Applications in quantum cosmology.Phys

    Dhurjati Prasad Datta. Geometric phase in vacuum instability: Applications in quantum cosmology.Phys. Rev. D, 48(12):5746–5750, December 1993

    work page 1993

  12. [12]

    Topological states of condensed matter

    Jing Wang and Shou-Cheng Zhang. Topological states of condensed matter. Nature Materials, 16(11):1062– 1067, November 2017

    work page 2017

  13. [13]

    Stormer, and Philip Kim

    Yuanbo Zhang, Yan-Wen Tan, Horst L. Stormer, and Philip Kim. Experimental observation of the quantum Hall effect and Berry’s phase in graphene.Nature (Lon- don), 438(7065):201–204, November 2005

    work page 2005

  14. [14]

    REVIEW ARTICLE: Manifestations of Berry’s phase in molecules and condensed matter.Jour- nal of Physics Condensed Matter , 12(9):R107–R143, March 2000

    Raffaele Resta. REVIEW ARTICLE: Manifestations of Berry’s phase in molecules and condensed matter.Jour- nal of Physics Condensed Matter , 12(9):R107–R143, March 2000

    work page 2000

  15. [15]

    Berry’s phase in chiral gauge theories

    Hidenori Sonoda. Berry’s phase in chiral gauge theories. Nuclear Physics B , 266(2):410–422, March 1986

    work page 1986

  16. [16]

    Dorrah, Michele Tamagnone, Noah A

    Ahmed H. Dorrah, Michele Tamagnone, Noah A. Ru- bin, Aun Zaidi, and Federico Capasso. Introduc- ing berry phase gradients along the optical path via propagation-dependent polarization transformations. Nanophotonics, 11(4):713–725, 2022

    work page 2022

  17. [17]

    Akira Tomita and Raymond Y. Chiao. Observation of berry’s topological phase by use of an optical fiber. Phys. Rev. Lett., 57:937–940, Aug 1986

    work page 1986

  18. [18]

    Zwanziger, Markus Koenig, and Alexander Pines

    Josef W. Zwanziger, Markus Koenig, and Alexander Pines. Berry’s phase.Annual Review of Physical Chem- istry, 41:601–646, 1990

    work page 1990

  19. [19]

    The optical Möbius strip cavity: Tailoring geometric phases and far fields

    Jakob Kreismann and Martina Hentschel. The optical Möbius strip cavity: Tailoring geometric phases and far fields. EPL (Europhysics Letters) , 121(2):24001, Jan- uary 2018

    work page 2018

  20. [20]

    S. L. Li, L. B. Ma, V. M. Fomin, S. Böttner, M. R. Jorgensen, and O. G. Schmidt. Non-integer optical modes in a Möbius-ring resonator.arXiv e-prints, page arXiv:1311.7158, November 2013

    work page arXiv 2013

  21. [21]

    J. F. Bourhill, E. C. I. Paterson, M. Goryachev, and M. E. Tobar. Searching for ultralight axions with twisted cavity resonators of anyon rotational symme- try with bulk modes of nonzero helicity.Phys. Rev. D , 108(5):052014, September 2023

    work page 2023

  22. [22]

    Aharonov and J

    Y. Aharonov and J. Anandan. Phase change during a cyclic quantum evolution. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 58:1593– 1596, Apr 1987

    work page 1987

  23. [23]

    Ferrer- Garcia, Avishy Carmi, Eliahu Cohen, and Ebrahim Karimi

    Hugo Larocque, Alessio D’Errico, Manuel F. Ferrer- Garcia, Avishy Carmi, Eliahu Cohen, and Ebrahim Karimi. Optical framed knots as information carriers. Nature Communications, 11:5119, October 2020

    work page 2020

  24. [24]

    Bliokh, Avi Niv, Vladimir Kleiner, and ErezHasman

    Konstantin Y. Bliokh, Avi Niv, Vladimir Kleiner, and ErezHasman. Geometrodynamicsofspinninglight. Na- ture Photonics, 2(12):748–753, December 2008

    work page 2008

  25. [25]

    Chiao and Yong-Shi Wu

    Raymond Y. Chiao and Yong-Shi Wu. Manifestations of berry’s topological phase for the photon.Phys. Rev. Lett., 57:933–936, Aug 1986

    work page 1986

  26. [26]

    The geometric phase made simple

    Miguel Alonso and Mark Dennis. The geometric phase made simple. Photoniques, pages 58–63, 11 2022. 6

    work page 2022

  27. [27]

    E. C. I. Paterson, J. Bourhill, M. E. Tobar, and M. Goryachev. Electromagnetic helicity in twisted cav- ity resonators, 2025

    work page 2025

  28. [28]

    Alpeggiani, K

    F. Alpeggiani, K. Y. Bliokh, F. Nori, and L. Kuipers. Electromagnetic helicity in complex media.Phys. Rev. Lett., 120:243605, Jun 2018

    work page 2018

  29. [29]

    Bliokh, Yuri S

    Konstantin Y. Bliokh, Yuri S. Kivshar, and Franco Nori. Magnetoelectric effects in local light-matter in- teractions. Phys. Rev. Lett., 113:033601, Jul 2014

    work page 2014

  30. [30]

    Rodríguez-Fortu no, and Alejandro Martínez

    Josep Martínez-Romeu, Iago Diez, Sebastian Go- lat, Francisco J. Rodríguez-Fortu no, and Alejandro Martínez. Chiral forces in longitudinally invariant di- electric photonic waveguides.Photon. Res., 12(3):431– 443, Mar 2024

    work page 2024

  31. [31]

    Dual electromagnetism: helicity, spin, momentum and angular momentum

    Konstantin Y Bliokh, Aleksandr Y Bekshaev, and Franco Nori. Dual electromagnetism: helicity, spin, momentum and angular momentum. New Journal of Physics, 15(3):033026, mar 2013

    work page 2013

  32. [32]

    Glazebrook, and Antonino Mar- ciano

    Chris Fields, James F. Glazebrook, and Antonino Mar- ciano. The physical meaning of the holographic prin- ciple. arXiv e-prints, page arXiv:2210.16021, October 2022

    work page arXiv 2022

  33. [33]

    The Holographic Principle, pages 75–

    Raphael Bousso. The Holographic Principle, pages 75–

    work page

  34. [34]

    Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 2003

    work page 2003

  35. [35]

    Creedon, Maxim Goryachev, Nikita Kostylev, Timothy B

    Daniel L. Creedon, Maxim Goryachev, Nikita Kostylev, Timothy B. Sercombe, and Michael E. Tobar. A 3d printed superconducting aluminium microwave cavity. Applied Physics Letters, 109(3):032601, 2016

    work page 2016

  36. [36]

    Weichao Yu, Tao Yu, and Gerrit E. W. Bauer. Cir- culating cavity magnon polaritons. Phys. Rev. B , 102:064416, Aug 2020

    work page 2020

  37. [37]

    Electromag- netic scattering at the waveguide step between equilat- eral triangular waveguides

    Ana Lopez Moran, Juan Córcoles, Jorge Ruiz-Cruz, José Montejo-Garai, and Jesus Rebollar. Electromag- netic scattering at the waveguide step between equilat- eral triangular waveguides. Advances in Mathematical Physics, 2016:1–16, 01 2016

    work page 2016

  38. [38]

    David M. Pozar. Rectangular Waveguide Cavity Res- onators, page 284–285. J. Wiley & Sons, 4 edition, 2012. 7 SUPPLEMENT AR Y MA TERIAL S1. Berry Phase F ormula Here, the derivation of the formula for the Berry phase (1) in aDi̸=0 3 A resonator is given. The resonant mode condition of both the Möbius and mirror-symmetric curved resonators can be derived by...

    work page 2012