pith. sign in

arxiv: 2506.07435 · v3 · submitted 2025-06-09 · 💻 cs.SI · cs.AI· cs.LG

Fast Geometric Embedding for Node Influence Maximization

Alexander Kolpakov , Igor Rivin This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 11:19 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.SI cs.AIcs.LG
keywords force layoutgraph embeddingcentralityinfluence maximizationnetwork analysisscalable algorithmsnode ranking
0
0 comments X

The pith

A force-layout embedding of a graph makes radial distance from the origin a proxy for centrality measures and influence.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces an efficient force layout algorithm to embed graphs in low-dimensional space. In this embedding, a node's radial distance from the origin serves as a stand-in for expensive-to-compute centrality scores such as betweenness and closeness. The authors show that this distance correlates strongly with degree, PageRank, and path-based centralities across several graph families. Because influence maximization typically uses greedy algorithms that scale poorly, this geometric proxy offers a fast way to identify high-influence nodes. A sympathetic reader would care if the embedding can replace heavy computations in network analysis tasks that involve large graphs.

Core claim

We introduce an efficient force layout algorithm that embeds a graph into a low-dimensional space, where the radial distance from the origin serves as a proxy for various centrality measures. We evaluate our method on multiple graph families and demonstrate strong correlations with degree, PageRank, and paths-based centralities. As an application, the proposed embedding allows one to find high-influence nodes in a network and provides a fast and scalable alternative to the standard greedy algorithm.

What carries the argument

Efficient force layout algorithm embedding the graph in low-dimensional space so that radial distance from the origin proxies centrality.

Load-bearing premise

Radial distance from the origin in the force-layout embedding correlates reliably with standard centrality measures and this correlation carries over to effective selection of influential nodes.

What would settle it

Compare the spread of influence achieved by selecting nodes with smallest radial distance against the spread from the greedy algorithm on benchmark graphs using standard diffusion models; large gaps in performance would falsify the proxy's usefulness.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.07435 by Alexander Kolpakov, Igor Rivin.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The initial embedding and the final layout. Vertex [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The initial embedding and the final layout. Vertex [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: The initial embedding and the final layout. Vertex [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Graph layout produced by the Laplacian eigenmap, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Computing classical centrality measures such as betweenness and closeness is computationally expensive on large-scale graphs. In this work, we introduce an efficient force layout algorithm that embeds a graph into a low-dimensional space, where the radial distance from the origin serves as a proxy for various centrality measures. We evaluate our method on multiple graph families and demonstrate strong correlations with degree, PageRank, and paths-based centralities. As an application, it turns out that the proposed embedding allows one to find high-influence nodes in a network, and provides a fast and scalable alternative to the standard greedy algorithm.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper introduces an efficient force-layout embedding algorithm that places nodes of a graph into a low-dimensional space, using radial distance from the origin as a proxy for classical centrality measures such as degree, PageRank, and path-based centralities. It reports strong correlations across multiple graph families and positions the method as a fast, scalable alternative to the standard greedy algorithm for identifying high-influence nodes in influence maximization tasks.

Significance. A validated geometric proxy for centrality that enables rapid identification of influential nodes could provide a practical heuristic for influence maximization on large networks where exact centrality computations or greedy optimization become prohibitive. The approach builds on force-directed layouts in a novel way for this application, but its significance is currently constrained by the absence of direct end-to-end evaluations against established baselines.

major comments (3)
  1. Abstract: The central claim that the embedding 'provides a fast and scalable alternative to the standard greedy algorithm' for influence maximization is not supported by any reported comparison of expected influence spread (under Independent Cascade or Linear Threshold models) between nodes selected by smallest radial distance and the set returned by the greedy algorithm on the same graphs and diffusion parameters.
  2. Evaluation (implied by abstract and claims): No quantitative results, error bars, specific graph families, or exclusion rules are detailed to substantiate the 'strong correlations' with degree, PageRank, and path-based centralities, preventing verification of whether the radial-distance proxy reliably transfers to influence-maximization performance across tested structures.
  3. Method description: The force-layout algorithm is presented without explicit equations, convergence criteria, or parameter settings (e.g., spring constants, repulsion factors, or embedding dimension), making it impossible to assess reproducibility or the precise geometric construction that yields the claimed parameter-free proxy.
minor comments (1)
  1. The abstract would be clearer if it specified the target dimensionality of the embedding and the exact diffusion models used in any influence-related experiments.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive feedback, which highlights important areas for strengthening the manuscript. We agree that direct evaluations and additional methodological details are needed to better support the claims. We address each major comment below and will incorporate revisions in the next version of the paper.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Abstract: The central claim that the embedding 'provides a fast and scalable alternative to the standard greedy algorithm' for influence maximization is not supported by any reported comparison of expected influence spread (under Independent Cascade or Linear Threshold models) between nodes selected by smallest radial distance and the set returned by the greedy algorithm on the same graphs and diffusion parameters.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the abstract advances a claim about serving as a fast alternative to the greedy algorithm without including direct comparisons of influence spread. The current manuscript focuses on correlations between radial distance and classical centralities (which are established proxies for influence), but does not report end-to-end influence maximization results under IC or LT models. To directly substantiate the claim, we will add experiments in the revised manuscript that compute and compare expected influence spread for top-k nodes selected by radial distance versus the greedy algorithm, using the same graphs and diffusion parameters, with quantitative metrics and error bars. revision: yes

  2. Referee: Evaluation (implied by abstract and claims): No quantitative results, error bars, specific graph families, or exclusion rules are detailed to substantiate the 'strong correlations' with degree, PageRank, and path-based centralities, preventing verification of whether the radial-distance proxy reliably transfers to influence-maximization performance across tested structures.

    Authors: We will expand the evaluation section to report specific quantitative results, including correlation coefficients (e.g., Pearson and Spearman) for each centrality measure across the tested graphs. We will specify the graph families (such as synthetic scale-free, small-world, and real-world networks), include error bars from repeated embedding runs where relevant, and clarify any node or graph exclusion criteria. These additions will allow verification of the correlations and their applicability to influence maximization performance. revision: yes

  3. Referee: Method description: The force-layout algorithm is presented without explicit equations, convergence criteria, or parameter settings (e.g., spring constants, repulsion factors, or embedding dimension), making it impossible to assess reproducibility or the precise geometric construction that yields the claimed parameter-free proxy.

    Authors: We agree that the method section requires more detail for reproducibility. In the revision, we will include the explicit force equations for the layout algorithm (attractive and repulsive components), specify convergence criteria such as iteration limits or force magnitude thresholds, and document the parameter settings including spring constants, repulsion factors, and embedding dimension. While the radial-distance proxy is intended to be largely parameter-free in practice, providing these defaults and the geometric construction details will address the concern. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: algorithmic construction evaluated empirically

full rationale

The manuscript presents a force-layout embedding algorithm whose radial-distance proxy is defined directly from the embedding procedure and then correlated against standard centralities on multiple graph families. No equations, fitted parameters, or self-citations are shown that reduce the claimed proxy or influence-maximization application back to the input data by construction. The derivation chain consists of an explicit algorithmic step followed by empirical measurement; it remains self-contained against external benchmarks and does not invoke load-bearing self-citations or uniqueness theorems.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review supplies no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; the method appears to rest on the standard force-layout objective and the unstated assumption that the resulting radial coordinate tracks centrality.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5615 in / 990 out tokens · 38375 ms · 2026-05-19T11:19:16.652501+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

13 extracted references · 13 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    On Random Graphs I

    [ER59] Paul Erd ˝os and Alfr ´ed R ´enyi. “On Random Graphs I”. In: Publicationes Mathematicae 6 (1959), pp. 290–297. 7 [Bon72] Phillip Bonacich. “Factoring and weighting ap- proaches to status scores and clique identifica- tion”. In: Journal of Mathematical Sociology 2.1 (1972), pp. 113–120. DOI: 10.1080/0022250X. 1972.9989806. [Fre79] Linton C. Freeman....

    work page doi:10.1080/0022250x 1959

  2. [2]

    Centrality in social networks: II. Experimental results

    Else- vier, 1979, pp. 215–239. [FRM79] Linton C. Freeman, Douglas Roeder, and Robert R. Mulholland. “Centrality in social networks: II. Experimental results”. In: Social Networks 2 (1979), pp. 119–141. [BP98] Sergey Brin and Lawrence Page. “The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual Web search engine”. In: Computer Networks and ISDN Systems 30.1-7 (1998), ...

    work page 1979

  3. [3]

    A faster algorithm for between- ness centrality

    1038/30918. [Bra01] Ulrik Brandes. “A faster algorithm for between- ness centrality”. In: Journal of Mathematical So- ciology 25.2 (2001), pp. 163–177. [GKK01] K.-I. Goh, B. Kahng, and D. Kim. “Universal behavior of load distribution in scale-free net- works”. In: Physical Review Letters 87.27 (2001), p. 278701. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.278701. [HK02] ...

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.87.278701 2001

  4. [4]

    [LKF07b] Jure Leskovec, Jon Kleinberg, and Christos Faloutsos

    DOI: 10.1145/1217299.1217301. [LKF07b] Jure Leskovec, Jon Kleinberg, and Christos Faloutsos. Graph of coauthorships in the e-print arXiv General Relativity and Quantum Cosmol- ogy category . http://snap.stanford.edu/data/ca- GrQc.html. From: J. Leskovec, J. Kleinberg and C. Faloutsos. Graph Evolution: Densification and Shrinking Diameters. ACM TKDD, 1(1),

    work page doi:10.1145/1217299.1217301

  5. [6]

    Wikipedia Vote Network

    [LHK08] Jure Leskovec, Daniel Huttenlocher, and Jon Kleinberg. Wikipedia Vote Network . http://snap. stanford . edu / data / wiki - V ote . html. Accessed: 2025-06-01

    work page 2025

  6. [7]

    How correlated are network centrality measures?

    [Val+08] Thomas W. Valente et al. “How correlated are network centrality measures?” In: Connections 28.1 (2008), pp. 16–26. [CFS09] Jie Chen, Haw-ren Fang, and Yousef Saad. “Fast Approximate kNN Graph Construction for High Dimensional Data via Recursive Lanczos Bisec- tion”. In: Journal of Machine Learning Research 10 (2009), pp. 1989–2012. URL: https://j...

    work page doi:10.1145/1963405.1963487 2008

  7. [8]

    Accessed: 2025-06-01

    work page 2025

  8. [9]

    Curran Associates, Inc., 2012, pp

    Accessed: 2025-06-01. Curran Associates, Inc., 2012, pp. 539–547. URL: https://papers.nips.cc/paper/4532- learning- to- discover-social-circles-in-ego-networks. [LK14] Jure Leskovec and Andrej Krevl. SNAP Datasets: Stanford Large Network Dataset Collection . http: //snap.stanford.edu/data. Accessed: 2025-06-01

    work page 2025

  9. [10]

    NDlib: A Python Library to Model and Analyze Diffusion Processes on Com- plex Networks

    [Ros+16] Giulio Rossetti et al. NDlib: A Python Library to Model and Analyze Diffusion Processes on Com- plex Networks. https://github.com/GiulioRossetti/ ndlib. Accessed: 2025-06-01

    work page 2025

  10. [11]

    UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection

    URL: http://github.com/google/ jax. [MHM18] Leland McInnes, John Healy, and James Melville. “UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection”. In: Journal of Open Source Software 3.29 (2018), p

    work page 2018

  11. [12]

    2018 , publisher =

    DOI: 10.21105/joss.00861. URL: https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.00861. [AW19] Ehsan Amid and Manfred K Warmuth. “TriMap: large-scale dimensionality reduction using triplets”. In: arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.00204 (2019). [Dev20] PaCMAP Developers. PaCMAP: Pairwise Con- trolled Manifold Approximation . https : / / github. com / YingfanWang / PaCMAP. Accessed: 2...

    work page doi:10.21105/joss.00861 1910

  12. [13]

    Understanding how di- mension reduction tools work: an empirical ap- proach to deciphering t-SNE, UMAP, TriMAP, and PaCMAP for data visualization

    [Wan+21] Yingfan Wang et al. “Understanding how di- mension reduction tools work: an empirical ap- proach to deciphering t-SNE, UMAP, TriMAP, and PaCMAP for data visualization”. In: JMLR 22.201 (2021), pp. 1–73. 8 [Dev25] UMAP Developers. Uniform Manifold Approxi- mation and Projection (UMAP) . https://github. com/lmcinnes/umap/

    work page 2021

  13. [14]

    GraphEm: Graph Embedding for efficient centrality approx- imation

    [KR25] Alexander Kolpakov and Igor Rivin. GraphEm: Graph Embedding for efficient centrality approx- imation. https : / / github . com / sashakolpakov / graphem. 2025

    work page 2025