Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 89 references

Wave-function microscopy: Derivation and anatomy of exact algebraic spinful wave functions and full Wigner-molecular spectra of a few highly correlated rapidly rotating ultracold fermionic atoms

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Rapidly rotating two- and three-fermion systems in the lowest Landau level have exact closed-form wave functions that realize rotating and vibrating Wigner molecules, matching the full numerical solution coefficient by coefficient and…

desk verdict A genuinely useful exact-diagonalization-to-algebra transcription for few spinful LLL fermions, with the N=3 results and the Halperin failure analysis being the new meat; the unspecified degeneracy-lifting perturbation is a real caveat but not a fatal one. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.08145 v1 pith:TM4UIL5Z submitted 2025-06-09 cond-mat.quant-gas nucl-thquant-ph

Constantine Yannouleas , Uzi Landman This is my paper
classification cond-mat.quant-gasnucl-thquant-ph
keywords lowestLandaulevelrapidlyrotatingultracoldfermionsWignermoleculesalgebraicwavefunctionsfullconfigurationinteractionspinfulcontactthree-bodycorrelations
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that the full lowest-Landau-level spectrum of two and three spinful fermions, ground and excited states alike, is reproduced exactly by algebraic wave functions built from rotating and vibrating Wigner molecules, clusters in which particles arrange into a rotating geometric shape rather than a featureless liquid. If correct, a few strongly correlated fermions in a rapidly rotating trap have closed-form wave functions, so their spectra, spin labels, and correlation patterns can be written down and compared directly with experiment. The derivation couples exact numerical diagonalization with symbolic algebra to read integer polynomials off the numerical coefficients, then verifies the equality coefficient by coefficient. The earlier pair-product trial wave functions match these exact states only for a small subset of cases and fail already for three fermions.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing construction is the projected rotating Wigner molecule: one starts with a symmetry-broken pinned molecule made of displaced lowest-Landau-level Gaussians centered at the classical positions, antipodal for two atoms and an equilateral triangle for three, couples that spatial piece to the correct three-fermion spin eigenfunctions, and restores circular symmetry by angular-momentum projection. The projected polynomials are then matched, term by term, against exact full configuration interaction states, and the excitation branches are completed by multiplying by a center-of-mass factor $z_{\mathrm{c.o.m.}}$ and by translation-invariant vibrational polynomials $Q_\lambda$. This object carries the argument because it supplies a closed algebraic form for every state in the spectrum and a molecular reading of the physics.

What would settle it

Measure or compute the three-body correlation of the three-fermion ground state at $L=2$: the exact algebraic wave function predicts a sharp maximum when the three atoms sit at an equilateral triangle, whereas a fluid-type trial state would not. Alternatively, compare the zero pattern at $L=4$ for three atoms: the exact states show three first-order zeros in the wave-function phase, while the pair-product trial state shows one second-order zero; finding the latter would refute the central claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that for $N=2$ and $N=3$ spinful fermions in a rapidly rotating harmonic trap, every state of the lowest-Landau-level spectrum at total angular momentum $L\le 4$ has an exact algebraic form: a homogeneous polynomial in the particle coordinates times Gaussian factors and spin eigenfunctions. These polynomials coincide with the numerical full configuration interaction solutions in every coefficient, and they factor into rotating-molecule and ro-vibrational-molecule components, including center-of-mass translation factors $z_{\mathrm{c.o.m.}}$ and translation-invariant multipolar vibration factors $Q_\lambda$. For two fermions the purely rotating state is $(z_1-z_2)^L$; for three fermions the states are compact combinations of three-particle Jacobi coordinates, with the ground state at $L=2$ displaying an equilateral triangular three-body correlation. The pair-product trial functions agree with the exact states only for a minority of zero-energy cases, chiefly two fermions, and for three fermions at $L=4$ they have the wrong zero pattern and do not conserve total spin.

Load-bearing premise

The result hinges on the assumption that a real quickly rotating trap behaves exactly like a flat two-dimensional system in which atoms interact only when they coincide, and that a tiny unspecified influence selects the same spin combinations as the model's perturbation.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The complete lowest-Landau-level spectrum for two and three spinful fermions at $L\le 4$ is available in closed form, so future experiments can be compared state by state with exact energies, spin labels, and correlation maps.
  • The antipodal two-body correlation observed in the two-fermion experiment follows exactly from the rotating-molecule wave function $(z_1-z_2)^L$, putting the molecular picture on the same footing as the numerical solution.
  • For three fermions, the ground state at $L=2$ predicts an equilateral-triangle three-body correlation, a measurable fingerprint of ro-vibrational Wigner-molecule structure.
  • States lying on the same horizontal line of the spectrum differ by one power of the center-of-mass coordinate, so the spectral ladders have a simple kinematic origin.
  • The full configuration interaction plus symbolic procedure applies to bosonic systems as well and is expected to scale to about ten particles.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • An extension the paper leaves implicit is that the molecular form is likely generic for any finite $N$ in the lowest Landau level with contact interactions: every eigenstate should be expressible as a fixed intrinsic polynomial times powers of the center-of-mass coordinate, with spin eigenstates built in. This is testable by running the same pipeline for $N=4$ and $N=5$.
  • The failure of pair-product trial functions to conserve total spin suggests a general design rule for few-fermion quantum-Hall trial states: enforce spin eigenstate structure from the outset, or the trial function cannot match the physical spectrum even if its energy is close.
  • The work suggests a concrete experimental route to test the molecular picture: measure the three-body correlation of three rapidly rotating fermionic atoms in the $L=2$ ground state and look for an equilateral triangular maximum.
  • Because the Hamiltonian is scale-free in the lowest Landau level, the derived wave functions should carry over to any contact-interacting two-component fermionic species in a rapidly rotating trap, not only the lithium isotope studied here.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper develops a methodology that combines full configuration interaction (FCI) exact diagonalization with symbolic-language processing to produce closed-form algebraic wavefunctions for two and three spinful fermionic 6Li atoms in a rapidly rotating harmonic trap, in the lowest Landau level (LLL) with contact interactions. For angular momenta L≤4, the paper reports that all states of the LLL spectrum can be written as homogeneous polynomials in the particle coordinates, and it interprets these states as rotating and ro-vibrating Wigner molecules (RWM and RVWM). The central technical result is the transcription of numerical FCI eigenvectors into algebraic coefficients (Tables I–VII, X–XVII), the assertion that these polynomials coincide with wavefunctions obtained from a projected displaced-Gaussian RWM ansatz, and a comparison with Halperin trial states for N=3, L=4, where the Halperin form is shown to disagree with the FCI wavefunctions and to violate the Fock conditions.

Significance. If the algebraic wavefunctions are correct, the paper provides exact closed-form wavefunctions for few spinful LLL fermions with contact interactions, going beyond the Jastrow-type Halperin/Laughlin trial states that have been used to analyze the recent experiment on two rapidly rotating fermions (Ref. [10]). The paper's direct comparison of numerical CI coefficients with algebraic numbers, rather than overlap integrals, is a useful validation strategy. The correlation plots (Figs. 3 and 4) give concrete, falsifiable predictions for higher-order correlation measurements. The extension to N=3 is a natural and timely target for future experiments. However, the physical interpretation and the uniqueness of the specific wavefunctions are weakened by the unspecified degeneracy-lifting perturbation V_P (Appendix D) and by the lack of a fully shown independent derivation of the N=3 RWM compact formula (Eq. (18)). These issues do not invalidate the algebraic construction, but they reduce the strength of the paper's claims about what the exact wavefunctions predict for experiments.

major comments (4)
  1. [Appendix D; Eqs. (B7) and (B8)] The FCI procedure requires adding a small perturbing term V_P (Appendix D) to lift degeneracies among zero-energy states and to produce numerical eigenstates with definite total spin, but V_P is never specified. In a degenerate manifold containing several states with the same total spin—for example, the two S=1 zero-interaction-energy states at N=2, L=3 given in Eqs. (B7) and (B8)—different choices of V_P select different linear combinations. The algebraic wavefunctions presented are therefore not uniquely determined by the idealized H_LLL; they are eigenstates of H_LLL + V_P for an unstated V_P. This weakens the claim that these specific wavefunctions describe rapidly rotating 6Li atoms, and it also affects the comparison with the Halperin trial state in Sec. VII, since a different perturbation could select a different combination inside the degenerate subspace. The authors should either specify V_P explicitly, or state clearly that the algebraic expressions form a basis of each degenerate manifold and that any physical perturbation must be diagonalized within it.
  2. [Sec. IV, Eq. (18)] The compact RWM formula for N=3, Eq. (18), is stated as the output of symbolic scripts without showing the intermediate projection calculation. This is load-bearing for the claim that the algebraic wavefunctions are independently derived from the rotating-Wigner-molecule ansatz rather than being fitted to the FCI results. As written, the reader cannot check whether Eq. (18) follows from the projected displaced-Gaussian construction or whether it is an ansatz matched to the FCI output. The authors should provide the derivation (or at least an appendix with the explicit expansion for the presented L values) so that the independence of the RWM construction is verifiable.
  3. [Sec. V, Eq. (26) and Tables I–III] The 'validation' of the algebraic wavefunctions is partly circular: the coefficients c_alg are extracted from the numerical FCI coefficients c_CI by symbolic fitting, so the equality between the algebraic expression and the FCI wavefunction is true by construction up to numerical precision. The paper does not provide an independent algebraic check that the resulting polynomials are exact eigenstates of H_LLL; it only verifies total-spin quantum numbers and Fock conditions. This is not necessarily an error, but the claim of 'mathematical equality' with the FCI solutions should be qualified as an identification based on numerical diagonalization, and the independent content of the paper should rest on the RWM derivation, which is incomplete per the previous comment.
  4. [Abstract and Sec. II vs. Appendix B] The abstract and Sec. II state that algebraic expressions are presented for N=2 and N=3 with angular momenta L≤4, but Appendix B only gives the N=2 wavefunctions for L=0–3 (plus a separate L=5 example in Table I). The N=2 L=4 states are not exhibited. This is a concrete gap in the 'full LLL spectrum' claim. The authors should either add the missing N=2 L=4 wavefunctions or adjust the statement of scope.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Throughout] There are numerous typographical errors, e.g., 'Morover' (Intro), 'transciption' (Sec. VI), 'intergers' (Sec. VII), 'factots' (Sec. VII), 'ultarcold' (Sec. VII), 'Hamiltoninan' (Sec. II), and 'complimentary' (Intro). A careful proofread is needed.
  2. [Eq. (4) and Eq. (5)] The symbol Ψ_PWM± is used both for the full wavefunction with spin and for the spatial part alone. Please introduce a separate notation for the spatial part to avoid ambiguity.
  3. [Fig. 5 caption] The caption states 'with R=1.' and later 'Lengths in units of Λ'; the period after '1' is likely a typo, and the value of R should be stated explicitly.
  4. [Abstract] The abstract claims extension to bosonic systems, but the main text only mentions this possibility in the conclusions without any concrete results or references to a bosonic calculation. Please either provide such results or soften the claim.
  5. [Sec. II, Eq. (3)] The reduction to H_LLL omits the term ℏ(ω⊥−Ω)L, which is justified because L is conserved, but this should be stated explicitly in the main text (it is implicit in Appendix A).
  6. [Sec. V] The statement that coefficient comparison 'circumvents uncertainties associated with the van Vleck-Anderson orthogonality catastrophe' is an overstatement: the orthogonality catastrophe concerns overlaps of many-body states with different particle numbers or perturbations, not the comparison of coefficients in a fixed Hilbert space. Please rephrase.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

Algebraic wavefunctions are transcribed from FCI coefficients, so 'reproducing FCI' holds by construction; independent RWM projection grounds only part of the claim.

  1. self definitional [Sec. V, Eqs. (24)-(26) and 'Validation' paragraph; Tables I-III]
    "Validation of our closed-form analytic wave functions (see below) is achieved via direct comparison of the full set of numerical CI coefficients, cCI, with those in ΦCI_alg [Eq. (26)], thus circumventing uncertainties, associated with the common use of wave function overlap..."

    The algebraic wavefunctions ΦCI_alg are constructed by rewriting the numerical FCI expansion ΦCI = Σ cCI(I) D_I with coefficients c_alg that are identified with the cCI values (Tables I-VII). Therefore the abstract's statement that the analytic wavefunctions 'reproduce precisely the corresponding numerical FCI results' is true by construction: the 'validation' compares the wavefunction with its own defining expansion. The independent content resides in the separately projected-Gaussian RWM ansatz, which is shown to match a subset of states; the full-spectrum algebraic expressions and their claim of exactness are transcriptions of the FCI input.

full rationale

The derivation chain has a genuine non-circular core: the purely rotating Wigner-molecule states are built from displaced Gaussians plus angular-momentum projection (Eqs. 4-12 and 14-18), independent of FCI, and their equality with the exact FCI eigenstates for several L values is a real mathematical match. However, the paper's broader claim of deriving algebraic wavefunctions 'for the full LLL spectrum in all its complexity' relies on symbolic transcription of FCI coefficients (Eqs. 24-26), so the advertised reproduction of FCI is a consistency check rather than an external prediction. The ro-vibrational factors (Qλ, z_c.o.m. powers) are identified by factoring the already-transcribed FCI polynomials, making the 'anatomy' partly post hoc. Appendix D's admission that an unspecified small V_P lifts the zero-energy degeneracy and selects the total-spin combinations is a physical ambiguity rather than a circularity, but it tempers the experimental predictive content of the 'exact' states. On balance, the central algebraic-form result substantially reduces to restating the FCI input, while the molecular interpretation retains independent support, giving a moderate circularity score of 4.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central wavefunctions rest on the standard LLL contact-interaction model and the FCI basis. No free parameters are fitted, and no new entities are postulated. The degeneracy-lifting term is a methodological crutch rather than a physically specified perturbation.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The rapidly rotating trap is described by the LLL Hamiltonian H_LLL = (g/Λ^2) Σ δ^2(z_i-z_j) with contact interactions only.
    Sec II and Appendix A reduce the full Hamiltonian to Eq. (3) by assuming rapid rotation (Ω→ω⊥), weak interactions (no Landau level mixing), and zero-range scattering.
  • standard math FCI in the LLL single-particle basis spans the full N-fermion Hilbert space in the LLL.
    Sec V and Appendix D invoke completeness of the Fock-Darwin basis and Slater-Condon rules for exact diagonalization.
  • ad hoc to paper A small perturbing term V_P lifts zero-energy degeneracies without materially changing the physics and produces states with definite total spin.
    Appendix D introduces V_P (a hard wall or small Coulomb term) and asserts negligible eigenvalue influence, but its form is not specified; the selected degenerate wavefunctions depend on it.
  • domain assumption Total spin S is a good quantum number for the physical states and Fock conditions apply.
    Used throughout (Secs III, V, VII) to require spin eigenstates; appropriate for ultracold atoms with spin-conserving interactions.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Wave-function microscopy: Derivation and anatomy of exact algebraic spinful wave functions and full Wigner-molecular spectra of a few highly correlated rapidly rotating ultracold fermionic atoms." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/TM4UIL5Z

@misc{pith2026250608145,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Wave-function microscopy: Derivation and anatomy of exact algebraic spinful wave functions and full Wigner-molecular spectra of a few highly correlated rapidly rotating ultracold fermionic atoms},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/TM4UIL5Z}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.08145}
}
abstract

Exploring strongly correlated spinful states of few fermionic ultracold atoms in a rapidly rotating trap, an example of which was recently realized for two fermionic $^6$Li atoms in an optical tweezer, we derive analytical (algebraic) total-spin-eigenstate wavefunctions through the development and employment of a theoretical platform that integrates exact numerical diagonalization (full configuration interaction, FCI) with symbolic language processing. For such rapid rotations, where the atoms occupy the lowest Landau level (LLL), the obtained algebraic expressions can address the full LLL spectrum in all its complexity, demonstrating that their spatial, spectral, and spin characteristics manifest formation of collectively rotating and vibrating Wigner molecules. The explicitly exhibited analytic wavefunctions (for two and three spinful $^6$Li atoms) reproduce precisely the corresponding numerical FCI results, and they are shown to reach beyond the limited range of applicability of previous Jastrow-type treatments. These results, and their extension to bosonic systems, provide the impetus and analysis tools for future experimental and theoretical simulations of larger mesoscopic systems

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.08145 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. FCI spectrum for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. FCI spectrum for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. FIG. 4. The three-body correlation distribution associated [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Maps of Arg[ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

89 extracted references · 71 canonical work pages

  1. [10]

    of antipodal distributions of two ultra-cold tweezer- held 6Li atoms are in agreement with the emergent physics uncovered here. Furthermore, we anticipate that in line with the experimental developments, our current methodology could be applied presently to larger sizes (of the order of 10 fermions), with much lager sizes requir- ing further developments ...

  2. [1]

    2) [see Fig

    and a singlet excited state (No. 2) [see Fig. 1]. One has: ΨCI N=2,alg (L= 1; 1)∝(z 1 −z 2) = ΨR WM N=2 (L= 1)(B2) and ΨCI N=2,alg (L= 1; 2)∝(z 1 +z 2)∝z N=2 c.o.m..(B3) ForL= 2, the spectrum consists of a singlet 0IE (No. 1), a triplet 0IE state (No. 2), and a singlet excited state (No. 3) [see Fig. 1]. One has: ΨCI N=2,alg (L= 2; 1)∝(z 1 −z 2)2 = ΨR WM ...

  3. [2]

    Lewenstein, A

    M. Lewenstein, A. Sanpera, and V. Ahufinger,Ultracold Atoms in Optical Lattices: Simulating Quantum Many- Body Systems(Oxford Univ Pres, Oxford, 2022). 14

    2022

  4. [3]

    Dalibard, F

    J. Dalibard, F. Gerbier, G. Juzeli¯ unas, and P. Öh- berg, Colloquium: Artificial gauge potentials for neutral atoms, Rev. Mod. Phys.83, 1523–1543 (2011)

    2011

  5. [4]

    Bloch, J

    I. Bloch, J. Dalibard, and S. Nascimbène, Quantum sim- ulations with ultracold quantum gases, Nature Physics 8, 267–276 (2012)

    2012

  6. [5]

    Goldman, G

    N. Goldman, G. Juzeliunas, P. Öhberg, and I. B. Spiel- man, Light-induced gauge fields for ultracold atoms, Re- ports on Progress in Physics77, 126401 (2014)

    2014

  7. [6]

    R. P. Feynman, Simulating physics with computers, In- ternational Journal of Theoretical Physics21, 467–488 (1982)

    1982

  8. [7]

    Goldberg, C

    A. Goldberg, C. Yannouleas, and U. Landman, Elec- tronic wigner-molecule polymeric chains in elongated sili- con quantum dots and finite-length quantum wires, Phys. Rev. Appl.21, 064063 (2024)

    work page 2024

Show all 89 references
  1. [8]

    H. Li, Z. Xiang, A. P. Reddy, T. Devakul, R. Sailus, R. Banerjee, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, S. Tongay, A. Zettl, L. Fu, M. F. Crommie, and F. Wang, Wigner molecular crystals from multielectron moiré artificial atoms, Science385, 86–91 (2024)

    2024

  2. [9]

    Yannouleas and U

    C. Yannouleas and U. Landman, Crystal-Field Effects in the Formation of Wigner-Molecule Supercrystals in Moiré Transition Metal Dichalcogenide Superlattices, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 246502 (2024)

    2024

  3. [11]

    Dagotto, When oxides meet face to face, Science318, 1076–1077 (2007)

    E. Dagotto, When oxides meet face to face, Science318, 1076–1077 (2007)

    2007

  4. [12]

    J. J. . Bollinger, W. M. Itano, D. J. Wineland, and D. J. Heinzen, Optimal frequency measurements with maxi- mally correlated states, Phys. Rev. A54, R4649–R4652 (1996)

    1996

  5. [13]

    M. J. Holland and K. Burnett, Interferometric detection of optical phase shifts at the heisenberg limit, Phys. Rev. Lett.71, 1355–1358 (1993)

    1993

  6. [14]

    R. A. Campos, C. C. Gerry, and A. Benmoussa, Opti- cal interferometry at the heisenberg limit with twin fock statesandparitymeasurements,Phys.Rev.A68,023810 (2003)

    2003

  7. [15]

    P. Lunt, P. Hill, J. Reiter, P. M. Preiss, M. Gałka, and S. Jochim, Realization of a Laughlin State of Two RapidlyRotatingFermions,Phys.Rev.Lett.133,253401 (2024)

    2024

  8. [16]

    Yannouleas and U

    C. Yannouleas and U. Landman, Fractional quantum Hall physics and higher-order momentum correlations in a few spinful fermionic contact-interacting ultracold atoms in rotating traps, Phys. Rev. A102, 043317 (2020)

    2020

  9. [17]

    Negretti, P

    A. Negretti, P. Treutlein, and T. Calarco, Quantum com- puting implementations with neutral particles, Quantum Information Processing10, 721 (2011)

    2011

  10. [18]

    Laughlin quantum liquids

    through the use of extremely strong magnetic fields applied to semiconductors surfaces at very low temper- atures, that have led to the discovery of novel states of electrons, often called “Laughlin quantum liquids”, which are strongly-correlated phases described by Laughlin’s...

    2025 arXiv

  11. [19]

    R. B. Laughlin, Anomalous Quantum Hall Effect: An In- compressible Quantum Fluid with Fractionally Charged Excitations, Phys. Rev. Lett.50, 1395–1398 (1983)

    1983

  12. [20]

    J. P. Dowling, Correlated input-port, matter-wave inter- ferometer: Quantum-noise limits to the atom-laser gyro- scope, Phys. Rev. A57, 4736–4746 (1998)

    1998

  13. [21]

    Anderlini, P

    M. Anderlini, P. J. Lee, B. L. Brown, J. Sebby-Strabley, W. D. Phillips, and J. V. Porto, Controlled exchange in- teraction between pairs of neutral atoms in an optical lattice, Nature448, 452–456 (2007)

    2007

  14. [22]

    K. W. Madison, F. Chevy, W. Wohlleben, and J. Dal- ibard, Vortex formation in a stirred Bose-Einstein con- densate, Phys. Rev. Lett.84, 806–809 (2000)

    2000

  15. [23]

    D. C. Tsui, H. L. Stormer, and A. C. Gossard, Two- Dimensional Magnetotransport in the Extreme Quantum Limit, Phys. Rev. Lett.48, 1559–1562 (1982)

    1982

  16. [24]

    M. W. Zwierlein, J. R. Abo-Shaeer, A. Schirotzek, C. H. Schunck, and W. Ketterle, Vortices and superfluidity in a strongly interacting fermi gas, Nature435, 1047–1051 (2005)

    2005

  17. [25]

    Cooper, Rapidly rotating atomic gases, Advances in Physics57, 539–616 (2008)

    N. Cooper, Rapidly rotating atomic gases, Advances in Physics57, 539–616 (2008)

    2008

  18. [26]

    A. L. Fetter, Rotating trapped Bose-Einstein conden- sates, Rev. Mod. Phys.81, 647–691 (2009)

    2009

  19. [27]

    Schweikhard, S

    V. Schweikhard, S. Tung, and E. A. Cornell, Vortex pro- liferation in the berezinskii-kosterlitz-thouless regime on a two-dimensional lattice of bose-einstein condensates, Phys. Rev. Lett.99, 030401 (2007)

    2007

  20. [28]

    J. R. Abo-Shaeer, C. Raman, J. M. Vogels, and W. Ket- terle, Observation of vortex lattices in Bose-Einstein con- densates, Science292, 476–479 (2001)

    2001

  21. [29]

    Bretin, S

    V. Bretin, S. Stock, Y. Seurin, and J. Dalibard, Fast rotation of a bose-einstein condensate, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 050403 (2004)

    2004

  22. [30]

    Schweikhard, I

    V. Schweikhard, I. Coddington, P. Engels, V. P. Mogen- dorff, and E. A. Cornell, Rapidly rotating bose-einstein condensates in and near the lowest landau level, Phys. Rev. Lett.92, 040404 (2004)

    2004

  23. [31]

    Coddington, P

    I. Coddington, P. C. Haljan, P. Engels, V. Schweikhard, S. Tung, and E. A. Cornell, Experimental studies of equi- librium vortex properties in a bose-condensed gas, Phys. Rev. A70, 063607 (2004)

    2004

  24. [32]

    Mukherjee, A

    B. Mukherjee, A. Shaffer, P. B. Patel, Z. Yan, C. C. Wil- son, V. Crépel, R. J. Fletcher, and M. Zwierlein, Crys- tallization of bosonic quantum Hall states in a rotating quantum gas, Nature601, 58–62 (2022)

    2022

  25. [33]

    T. P. Polak and T. K. Kopeć, Frustration effects in rapidly rotating square and triangular optical lattices, Phys. Rev. A79, 063629 (2009)

    2009

  26. [34]

    Gemelke, E

    N. Gemelke, E. Sarajlic, and S. Chu, Rotating few-body atomic systems in the fractional quantum Hall regime (2010), arXiv:1007.2677 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

    2010 arXiv

  27. [35]

    R. J. Fletcher, A. Shaffer, C. C. Wilson, P. B. Patel, Z. Yan, V. Crépel, B. Mukherjee, and M. W. Zwierlein, Geometric squeezing into the lowest landau level, Science 372, 1318–1322 (2021)

    2021

  28. [36]

    Sharma and E

    V. Sharma and E. J. Mueller, Rotating bose gas dynami- cally entering the lowest Landau level, Phys. Rev. A105, 023310 (2022)

    2022

  29. [37]

    Yannouleas and U

    C. Yannouleas and U. Landman, Quantum Wigner molecules in moiré materials, Phys. Rev. B108, L121411 (2023)

    2023

  30. [38]

    R. Yao, S. Chi, B. Mukherjee, A. Shaffer, M. Zwierlein, and R. J. Fletcher, Observation of chiral edge transport in a rapidly rotating quantum gas, Nature Physics20, 1726–1731 (2024)

    2024

  31. [39]

    R. B. Laughlin, Elementary Theory: The Incompressible Quantum Fluid, inThe Quantum Hall Effect, edited by R. E. Prange and S. M. Girvin (Springer, New York, NY, 1990). 15

    1990

  32. [40]

    Léonard, S

    J. Léonard, S. Kim, J. Kwan, P. Segura, F. Grusdt, C. Repellin, N. Goldman, and M. Greiner, Realization of a fractional quantum Hall state with ultracold atoms, Nature619, 495–499 (2023)

    2023

  33. [41]

    L. W. Clark, N. Schine, C. Baum, N. Jia, and J. Simon, Observation of laughlin states made of light, Nature582, 41–45 (2020)

    2020

  34. [42]

    Yannouleas and U

    C. Yannouleas and U. Landman, Trial wave functions withlong-rangecoulombcorrelationsfortwo-dimensional N-electron systems in high magnetic fields, Phys. Rev. B 66, 115315 (2002)

    2002

  35. [43]

    Yannouleas and U

    C. Yannouleas and U. Landman, Wigner-molecule super- crystal in transition metal dichalcogenide moiré superlat- tices: Lessons from the bottom-up approach, Phys. Rev. B109, L121302 (2024)

    2024

  36. [44]

    Yannouleas and U

    C. Yannouleas and U. Landman, Quantal molecular de- scription and universal aspects of the spectra of bosons and fermions in the lowest Landau level, Phys. Rev. A 81, 023609 (2010)

    2010

  37. [45]

    This includes both comparison of the differing alge- braically forms of the wave functions considered here, as well as through analysis (shown in Fig

    wave functions forN= 3(atL= 4) fermions in the LLL. This includes both comparison of the differing alge- braically forms of the wave functions considered here, as well as through analysis (shown in Fig. 5) of the patterns of zeroes associated with the corresponding wave func- ...

  38. [46]

    R. B. Laughlin, Nobel Lecture: Fractional quantization, Rev. Mod. Phys.71, 863–874 (1999)

    1999

  39. [47]

    Simon, Wavefunctionology: The special structure of certain fractional quantum Hall wavefunctions, inFrac- tional quantum Hall effects: new developments, edited by B

    S. Simon, Wavefunctionology: The special structure of certain fractional quantum Hall wavefunctions, inFrac- tional quantum Hall effects: new developments, edited by B. I. Halperin and J. K. Jain (WORLD SCIENTIFIC, New Jersey, 2020)

    2020

  40. [48]

    Yannouleas and U

    C. Yannouleas and U. Landman, Two-dimensional quan- tum dots in high magnetic fields: Rotating-electron- molecule versus composite-fermion approach, Phys. Rev. B68, 035326 (2003)

    2003

  41. [49]

    L. Palm, F. Grusdt, and P. M. Preiss, Skyrmion ground states of rapidly rotating few-fermion systems, New Jour- nal of Physics22, 083037 (2020)

    2020

  42. [50]

    special quan- tum liquid

    and they lie along thex-axis in the FCI spectra dis- played in Fig. 1. The states (12) account only for a small part of the spectrum. Indeed, there are additional 0IE states (see the degeneracies specified in Fig. 1), as well as excitations with non-zero energy. As an example,...

  43. [51]

    B. I. Halperin, Theory ofthe quantized Hall conductance, Helvetica Physica Acta56, 75–102 (1983)

    1983

  44. [52]

    M. Popp, B. Paredes, and J. I. Cirac, Adiabatic path to fractional quantum Hall states of a few bosonic atoms, Phys. Rev. A70, 053612 (2004)

    2004

  45. [53]

    Romanovsky, C

    I. Romanovsky, C. Yannouleas, L. O. Baksmaty, and U. Landman, Bosonic molecules in rotating traps, Phys. Rev. Lett.97, 090401 (2006)

    2006

  46. [54]

    S. K. Baur, K. R. A. Hazzard, and E. J. Mueller, Stir- ring trapped atoms into fractional quantum Hall puddles, Phys. Rev. A78, 061608 (2008)

    2008

  47. [55]

    Yannouleas and U

    C. Yannouleas and U. Landman, Exact closed-form analytic wave functions in two dimensions: Contact- interacting fermionic spinful ultracold atoms in a rapidly rotating trap, Phys. Rev. Res.3, L032028 (2021)

    2021

  48. [56]

    BasedonFCIcalculations, RWMsforscalarbosonsinthe LLL were predicted in L. O. Baksmaty, C. Yannouleas, and U. Landman, Rapidly rotating boson molecules with long- or short-range repulsion: An exact diagonalization study, Phys. Rev. A75, 023620 (2007)

    2007

  49. [57]

    Wolfram Research, Inc., Mathematica, Version 14.0, Champaign, IL, 2024

    2024

  50. [58]

    Yannouleas and U

    C. Yannouleas and U. Landman, Symmetry breaking and quantum correlations in finite systems: Studies of quan- tum dots and ultracold Bose gases and related nuclear and chemical methods, Reports on Progress in Physics 70, 2067–2148 (2007)

    2007

  51. [59]

    Fock, Bemerkung zur quantelung des harmonischen oszillators im magnetfeld, Zeitschrift für Physik47, 446– 448 (1928)

    V. Fock, Bemerkung zur quantelung des harmonischen oszillators im magnetfeld, Zeitschrift für Physik47, 446– 448 (1928)

    1928

  52. [60]

    C. G. Darwin, The diamagnetism of the free electron, Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosoph- ical Society27, 86–90 (1931)

    1931

  53. [61]

    Y. Li, C. Yannouleas, and U. Landman, From a few to many electrons in quantum dots under strong magnetic fields: Propertiesofrotatingelectronmoleculeswithmul- tiple rings, Phys. Rev. B73, 075301 (2006)

    2006

  54. [62]

    Yannouleas and U

    C. Yannouleas and U. Landman, Structural properties of electrons in quantum dots in high magnetic fields: Crys- talline character of cusp states and excitation spectra, Phys. Rev. B70, 235319 (2004)

    2004

  55. [63]

    J. A. Sheikh, J. Dobaczewski, P. Ring, L. M. Robledo, and C. Yannouleas, Symmetry restoration in mean-field approaches, Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics48, 123001 (2021)

    2021

  56. [64]

    Yannouleas and U

    C. Yannouleas and U. Landman, Group theoretical anal- ysis of symmetry breaking in two-dimensional quantum dots, Phys. Rev. B68, 035325 (2003)

    2003

  57. [65]

    J. K. Jain,Composite Fermions(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2007)

    2007

  58. [66]

    Yoshioka, Wave function of the largest skyrmion on a sphere, J

    D. Yoshioka, Wave function of the largest skyrmion on a sphere, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.67, 3356 (1998)

    1998

  59. [67]

    J. H. van Vleck, Nonorthogonality and ferromagnetism, Phys. Rev.49, 232–240 (1936)

    1936

  60. [68]

    P. W. Anderson, Infrared catastrophe in fermi gases with local scattering potentials, Phys. Rev. Lett.18, 1049– 1051 (1967)

    1967

  61. [69]

    Kohn, Nobel Lecture: Electronic structure of matter- wave functions and density functionals, Rev

    W. Kohn, Nobel Lecture: Electronic structure of matter- wave functions and density functionals, Rev. Mod. Phys. 71, 1253–1266 (1999)

    1999

  62. [70]

    M. Knap, A. Shashi, Y. Nishida, A. Imambekov, D. A. Abanin, and E. Demler, Time-dependent impurity in ul- tracold fermions: Orthogonality catastrophe and beyond, Phys. Rev. X2, 041020 (2012)

    2012

  63. [71]

    F. Ares, K. S. Gupta, and A. R. de Queiroz, Orthogonal- ity catastrophe and fractional exclusion statistics, Phys. Rev. E97, 022133 (2018)

    2018

  64. [72]

    V. A. Fock, Wave functions of many-electron systems, J. Exptl. Theoret. Phys. (U.S.S.R.)10, 961 (1940)

    1940

  65. [73]

    A. V. Luzanov, Spin-free quantum chemistry: What one cangainfromFock’scyclicsymmetry,InternationalJour- nal of Quantum Chemistry111, 4042–4066 (2011)

    2011

  66. [74]

    F. D. M. Haldane and E. H. Rezayi, Spin-singlet wave function for the half-integral quantum Hall effect, Phys. Rev. Lett.60, 956–959 (1988)

    1988

  67. [75]

    Mottelson, Yrast Spectra of Weakly Interacting Bose- Einstein Condensates, Phys

    B. Mottelson, Yrast Spectra of Weakly Interacting Bose- Einstein Condensates, Phys. Rev. Lett.83, 2695–2698 (1999)

    1999

  68. [76]

    Papenbrock and G

    T. Papenbrock and G. F. Bertsch, Rotational spectra of weaklyinteractingBose-Einsteincondensates,Phys.Rev. A63, 023616 (2001)

    2001

  69. [77]

    S. M. Girvin and A. H. MacDonald, Multicomponent Quantum Hall Systems: The Sum of Their Parts and More, inPerspectives in Quantum Hall Effects(John Wi- ley & Sons, Ltd, 1996) Chap. 5, pp. 161–224

    1996

  70. [78]

    Tong, Lectures on the quantum Hall effect (2016), arXiv:1606.06687 [hep-th]

    D. Tong, Lectures on the quantum Hall effect (2016), arXiv:1606.06687 [hep-th]

    2016 arXiv

  71. [79]

    Shavitt, The history and evolution of configuration in- teraction, Molecular Physics94, 3–17 (1998)

    I. Shavitt, The history and evolution of configuration in- teraction, Molecular Physics94, 3–17 (1998)

    1998

  72. [80]

    A.SzaboandN.S.Ostlund,Modern Quantum Chemistry (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1989) For the Slater-Condon rules, see Chap. 4

    1989

  73. [81]

    M. B. Tavernier, E. Anisimovas, F. M. Peeters, B. Szafran, J. Adamowski, and S. Bednarek, Four- electron quantum dot in a magnetic field, Phys. Rev. B 68, 205305 (2003)

    2003

  74. [82]

    Rontani, C

    M. Rontani, C. Cavazzoni, D. Bellucci, and G. Goldoni, Full configuration interaction approach to the few- electron problem in artificial atoms, The Journal of Chemical Physics124, 124102 (2006)

    2006

  75. [83]

    Y. Li, C. Yannouleas, and U. Landman, Three-electron anisotropic quantum dots in variable magnetic fields: Ex- act results for excitation spectra, spin structures, and entanglement, Phys. Rev. B76, 245310 (2007)

    2007

  76. [84]

    Y. Li, C. Yannouleas, and U. Landman, Artificial quantum-dot Helium molecules: Electronic spectra, spin 16 structures, and Heisenberg clusters, Phys. Rev. B80, 045326 (2009)

    2009

  77. [85]

    Yannouleas and U

    C. Yannouleas and U. Landman, Molecular formations and spectra due to electron correlations in three-electron hybrid double-well qubits, Phys. Rev. B105, 205302 (2022)

    2022

  78. [86]

    Yannouleas and U

    C. Yannouleas and U. Landman, Valleytronic full configuration-interaction approach: Application to the excitation spectra of si double-dot qubits, Phys. Rev. B 106, 195306 (2022)

    2022

  79. [87]

    J. C. Slater, The theory of complex spectra, Phys. Rev. 34, 1293–1322 (1929)

    1929

  80. [88]

    E. U. Condon, The theory of complex spectra, Phys. Rev. 36, 1121–1133 (1930)

    1930

  81. [89]

    E.MacalusoandI.Carusotto,Hard-wallconfinementofa fractional quantum Hall liquid, Phys. Rev. A96, 043607 (2017)

    2017

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.