Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 53 references

Quasi-periodic flat-band model constructed by molecular-orbital representation

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A quasi-periodic flat-band model has a half-filled zero-mode density that is class-I hyperuniform for all parameters, and at the AAH self-dual point the sublattice densities are exactly 1/4.

desk verdict Nice construction and a clean exact λ=2 result, but the universal class-I hyperuniformity claim outruns the single-size numerics. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.08450 v1 pith:3PZUIUMZ submitted 2025-06-10 cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.dis-nncond-mat.stat-mechcond-mat.str-el

Tomonari Mizoguchi , Yasuhiro Hatsugai This is my paper
classification cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.dis-nncond-mat.stat-mechcond-mat.str-el
keywords flatbandsmolecular-orbitalrepresentationquasi-periodictight-bindingmodelAAHzero-energymodeshyperuniformitysaw-toothlatticeextended-to-localizedtransition
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper builds a one-dimensional tight-binding model on a saw-tooth lattice from molecular orbitals whose coefficients carry quasi-periodic modulation, so the Hamiltonian $H = \sum_n D_n^\dagger D_n$ retains a macroscopic set of exactly zero-energy modes while its finite-energy spectrum coincides with that of the AAH model (a one-dimensional chain with an incommensurate on-site potential) up to a constant shift. Its central claim is that the half-filled many-body state, in which every one of the $L$ degenerate zero modes is occupied, has a particle density $n_i = 1 - (\Psi O^{-1}\Psi^\dagger)_{ii}$ that belongs to the class-I hyperuniform distributions: the variance of the charge inside a window grows more slowly than the window length, and the order metric $\bar{B}(R)$ saturates, for all values of the quasi-periodicity strength $\lambda$ examined. At the self-dual point $\lambda = 2$ the sublattice-resolved densities are exactly $\bar{n}_A = \bar{n}_B = 1/4$, a fact proved through the duality of the AAH model. A reader should care because this would supply a deterministic quasi-periodic flat-band system whose zero-mode density has strongly suppressed long-wavelength fluctuations without any tuning of parameters.

What carries the argument

The central object is the molecular-orbital representation with quasi-periodic coefficients: defining $D_n = e^{-i\phi'/2}d_{n,A} + \sqrt{2\lambda}\cos(\pi n/\tau + \phi/2)d_{n,B} + e^{i\phi'/2}d_{n+1,A}$ and $D = \Psi^\dagger d$ turns the Hamiltonian into $H = \Psi\Psi^\dagger$, whose positive semidefiniteness guarantees a flat band of zero modes in the kernel of $\Psi^\dagger$. Everything else follows from the companion matrix $O = \Psi^\dagger\Psi$, which is the AAH model plus a shift $2+\lambda$: it supplies the finite-energy eigenstates, the density formula $n_i = 1 - (\Psi O^{-1}\Psi^\dagger)_{ii}$ for the fully occupied zero modes, and the self-dual identity at $\lambda=2$ that makes $\langle H_{\rm kin}\rangle_\ell = \langle H_{\rm pot}\rangle_\ell$ for every AAH eigenstate. The hyperuniformity classification is carried by two windowed quantities, $A(R)=\sigma^2(R)/R$ and the order metric $\bar{B}(R)=(1/\bar{n}^2 R)\sum_{R'\le R}\sigma^2(R')$, with saturation of $\bar{B}(R)$ defining class-I hyperuniformity.

What would settle it

Compute $\sigma^2(R)$, $A(R)$, and $\bar{B}(R)$ for the next Fibonacci approximants (for instance $m=24$, giving $L=75025$) and fit the large-$R$ trend; if for any $\lambda$ the variance grows like $R\ln R$ or $\bar{B}(R)$ fails to saturate, the class-I hyperuniformity claim fails. A cross-check is to compute the conventional structure factor $S(k)=\frac{1}{N}\left|\sum_i n_i e^{ik i}\right|^2$ and take $k\to0$: if it does not vanish, the density is not hyperuniform under the standard definition, exposing the classification as an artifact of the lattice-summation criterion.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Using the molecular-orbital representation, the authors write the Hamiltonian as $H = \Psi\Psi^\dagger$, which is positive semidefinite and has at least $L$ zero-energy eigenstates in the kernel of $\Psi^\dagger$; these can be represented as compact localized states (eigenstates supported on finitely many sites). The companion operator $O = \Psi^\dagger\Psi$ is exactly the AAH Hamiltonian shifted by $2+\lambda$, so every non-zero eigenstate of $H$ is a product of $\Psi$ with an AAH eigenstate, and the finite-energy modes undergo the same extended-to-localized transition at $\lambda = 2$. For the many-body state with all zero modes occupied, the site density is $n_i = 1 - (\Psi O^{-1}\Psi^\dagger)_{ii}$, and the paper's main numerical result is that this density is class-I hyperuniform: $A(R) = \sigma^2(R)/R$ decreases to zero and $\bar{B}(R)$ approaches a constant for each $\lambda$ in $0.5, 0.625, 0.645, 1, 2, 3$. The paper further proves that at $\lambda=2$ the A and B sublattice fillings are both exactly $1/4$, using the self-duality of the AAH model, and observes that the order metric is minimized at this same point.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the saturation of $\bar{B}(R)$ and the decay of $A(R)$ observed at $L=17711$ for six values of $\lambda$ correctly represent the infinite-size limit; if those indicators drift slowly, for example logarithmically, for some $\lambda$, the universal class-I claim would not survive.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the central claim is right, the fully occupied zero-mode density suppresses charge fluctuations in any window: $\sigma^2(R)$ grows slower than $R$, so the state is class-I hyperuniform for every coupling strength.
  • At $\lambda=2$, the AAH self-dual point, the sublattice fillings are exactly $\bar{n}_A=\bar{n}_B=1/4$, making that parameter value a hidden symmetric point of the many-body density.
  • The finite-energy modes inherit the AAH extended-to-localized transition: the inverse participation ratio scales as $L^{-1}$ for $\lambda<2$, is size-independent for $\lambda>2$, and shows critical scaling ($L^{-0.33}$) at $\lambda=2$.
  • The construction extends to molecular orbitals built from $M$ orbitals: the zero-mode degeneracy is $(M-2)L$, the filling is $(M-2)/(M-1)$, and at $\lambda=2$ rational sublattice fillings appear.
  • The order metric of the density is minimized at $\lambda=2$, so the same point that controls the single-particle transition also maximizes the suppression of density fluctuations in the zero-mode state.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the class-I behavior persists in the thermodynamic limit, this construction offers a deterministic way to engineer hyperuniform density profiles in optical lattices or photonic waveguides: the quasi-periodic flat-band ground state gives suppressed fluctuations without disorder or long-range interactions.
  • The density formula only needs the AAH-type operator $O$ and the rectangular matrix $\Psi$, suggesting a general principle: any MO-representation model whose companion operator is an AAH-type operator should produce hyperuniform zero-mode densities, so testing other incommensurate modulations (silver-mean sequences, diagonal Fibonacci potentials) would delimit how universal the phenomenon is.
  • Because the paper's hyperuniformity criterion uses lattice summation rather than the standard structure-factor definition, a direct computation of $S(k) \sim |k|^\alpha$ for the same densities would show whether the class-I assignment matches the convention used in quasicrystal studies; this is a testable benchmark, not a paper claim.
  • The exact balance at $\lambda=2$ relies on the AAH duality, which is special to that point; a natural extension would be to check whether other self-dual or critical points of generalized AAH models also force rational sublattice fillings.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper presents a one-dimensional tight-binding model on a sawtooth lattice built from a molecular-orbital representation with quasi-periodic coefficients. The Hamiltonian is a sum of squares H = Σ_n D†_n D_n (Eqs. 1–2), which guarantees L degenerate zero-energy modes. The finite-energy spectrum is mapped exactly to that of the Aubry–André–Harper (AAH) model with a constant shift, so the extended–localized transition is inherited. The central claim is that the particle density of the half-filled many-body state, in which the zero-energy modes are fully occupied, is class-I hyperuniform regardless of the model parameter (Sec. III.B). A theorem in Appendix A shows that at λ = 2 the sublattice-resolved fillings are exactly equal to 1/4.

Significance. If the universal hyperuniformity claim is correct, the paper provides a rare exact quasi-periodic flat-band model whose zero-mode density exhibits suppressed density fluctuations, with a transparent mapping to the AAH model. The analytical parts—spectral equivalence (Sec. II) and the λ = 2 sublattice balance (Appendix A)—are clean and correct. The paper also gives explicit formulas for the density (Eq. 12) and a clear numerical IPR scaling for the finite-energy modes (Sec. IV and Appendix B). However, the load-bearing numerical evidence for the universal class-I hyperuniformity is currently not strong enough to support the claim as stated.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. III.B (Eqs. 14–17, Fig. 7)] The central claim that the density is class-I hyperuniform 'regardless of the model parameter' rests entirely on numerical data at a single system size L = 17711, a single golden-mean approximant (m = 21, p = 1), and φ = φ' = 0. The indicators A(R) and B̄(R) are shown only over the range R up to about L/2; a rational approximant has no Fourier modes below q_min = 2π/L, so the decay of A(R) and saturation of B̄(R) cannot certify σ²(R) ~ const in the thermodynamic limit. A slow growth such as σ²(R) ~ c log R would be compatible with the plotted curves over a finite range. To support the universal class-I assignment, the authors should provide a scaling analysis across multiple approximants (e.g., L = F_{m+1} for several m) and show convergence of the order metric with L, or give a direct structure-factor extrapolation S(q) → 0 as q → 0.
  2. [Sec. III.B (definition of hyperuniformity)] The paper explicitly uses a lattice-summation definition of σ²(R), A(R), and B̄(R) that differs from the standard hyperuniformity definitions in Refs. [33–36]. While this choice is defensible, the manuscript does not benchmark the resulting classification against any known quasiperiodic or AAH density (e.g., the AAH density of Ref. [39]) under the same definition. Since the class-I assignment and the order-metric values are definition-dependent, the reader cannot judge whether the claim 'class-I hyperuniform' is comparable to prior results. A direct comparison on a standard test case, or a statement of how the definition changes the class thresholds, is needed.
  3. [Eq. (12) and thermodynamic limit] The density formula n_i = 1 − (ΨO^{-1}Ψ†)_{ii} uses O^{-1}; however, O = H_AAH + (2+λ)I has a spectral minimum that approaches 0 in the thermodynamic limit for each λ, since the AAH spectrum extends down to −2−λ. The paper does not address the limit L → ∞ of this expression, nor whether the hyperuniformity indicators are stable under the singular handling of O^{-1}. At λ = 2, where the sublattice balance is proved via a spectral argument in Appendix A, the issue is especially sharp. The authors should clarify that Eq. (12) is used only for finite L and prove or argue that the infinite-size density is well-defined, for example by expressing n_i directly in terms of the projector onto the zero-energy modes.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract and Introduction] The abstract and introduction contain typos: 'marcoscopically-dengenerate' should be 'macroscopically degenerate', and 'dengenerate' appears in the opening sentence.
  2. [Sec. V Summary] The summary contains duplicated words: 'several extensibilities of our model model construction' and later 'the the particle densities of two sublattices balance'.
  3. [Eq. (8)] The expression for the compact localized state L_n is typeset ambiguously; the division by the square-root and cosine factors needs parentheses so that the reader can distinguish L_n = −d_{n,A} + e^{φ'/2}(√(2λ)cos(...))^{-1} d_{n,B} + e^{-φ'/2}(√(2λ)cos(...))^{-1} d_{n−1,B} from a product of the cosine with the square root.
  4. [Sec. III.B and Fig. 7] The notation uses R for distances measured in site indices and R' for distances measured in unit-cell indices; this is introduced in the text but the figure caption would benefit from an explicit statement, as the reader may otherwise confuse the two axes.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the central construction and density results follow from explicitly defined matrices, with self-citations not load-bearing.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained rather than circular. The Hamiltonian H = sum_n D_n^dagger D_n is explicitly defined through the molecular-orbital operator in Eq. (1), and the zero-energy modes are constructed directly via the compact localized states L_n in Eq. (8), with the anticommutation relation {D_n, L_{n'}^dagger}=0 demonstrated in the text. The correspondence between the finite-energy modes and the Aubry-Andre-Harper model follows from the explicit matrix identity O = Psi^dagger Psi = H_AAH + (2+lambda)I in Eqs. (9)-(10), which is a direct algebraic consequence of the chosen MO coefficients, not an imported or fitted result. The central density formula Eq. (12), n_i = 1 - (Psi O^{-1} Psi^dagger)_{ii}, is cited to the authors' earlier work, but it is an elementary spectral-projection identity for the filled kernel of a positive semidefinite matrix and is not the target claim; moreover, the paper provides enough explicit matrix structure to verify it independently. The lambda=2 sublattice density balance is proved in Appendix A using the standard Harper duality at the self-dual point, cited to the established literature, and is not assumed as an input. The hyperuniformity classification is computed from the model's own particle densities using explicitly defined windowed variance and order-metric functions; the finite-size single-approximant evidence and the nonstandard lattice-summed definition raise legitimate concerns about the robustness of the 'regardless of parameter' claim, but these are evidence-quality limitations, not circular reductions. The paper's heavy self-citation reflects the authors' own molecular-orbital framework, but the load-bearing statements are either proved in the text or follow transparently from the stated definitions, so no circular step is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The model's free inputs are the AAH-style coupling λ and the MO phases; nothing is fitted to data. The numerically universal hyperuniformity claim rests on the commensurate-approximant assumption and on the AAH duality at λ=2. No new particles, forces, or dimensions are introduced; the molecular orbitals D_n are a matrix-construction device, not a new physical entity.

free parameters (3)
  • λ (coupling strength)
    Physical parameter scanned from 0.5 to 3; not fitted. The claims are made for all λ, but only six values are computed.
  • φ and φ' (MO phases) = 0
    Set to zero by hand in Sec. II; the λ=2 proof in Appendix A and all numerics use these values, yet the abstract's 'regardless of the model parameter' phrasing covers them.
  • Approximant order m and multiplier p = m=21, p=1, L=17711
    Chosen to satisfy commensurability L/τ' ∈ 2Z (Sec. II); the hyperuniformity classification is only checked at this system size.
assumptions (5)
  • standard math Nonzero spectra of H = ΨΨ† and O = Ψ†Ψ coincide, and ψ_ℓ = Ψφ_ℓ/√ε_ℓ is an eigenvector of H
    Used in Sec. II to map finite modes onto the AAH model; this is the singular-value-decomposition relation.
  • domain assumption At λ=2 the AAH model is self-dual with ⟨H_kin⟩_ℓ = ⟨H_pot⟩_ℓ = ε^AAH_ℓ/2 for every eigenstate
    Invoked in Appendix A (Eqs. A3-A6) to prove n̄_A = n̄_B = 1/4; cited to refs [31,52], not proven in this paper.
  • domain assumption The rational approximant τ'=F22/F21 with L=17711 and potential period F21 faithfully represents the incommensurate golden-mean limit
    All numerics (Figs. 3-9) use the commensurate system; the class-I hyperuniformity for the true irrational model is inferred, not computed.
  • domain assumption The kernel of Ψ† has dimension exactly L
    Holds for irrational τ since √(2λ)cos(πn/τ) never vanishes; for the finite approximant it requires that no B-site coefficient vanish, which is true for the chosen m and p but is not discussed.
  • standard math Since H is positive semidefinite, the L zero modes are ground states and |Ξ0⟩ is a half-filled ground state
    Used in Sec. III to identify the fully occupied zero-mode state as the relevant many-body state.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Quasi-periodic flat-band model constructed by molecular-orbital representation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/3PZUIUMZ

@misc{pith2026250608450,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Quasi-periodic flat-band model constructed by molecular-orbital representation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/3PZUIUMZ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.08450}
}
read the original abstract

We construct a tight-binding model that hosts both a quasi-periodic nature and marcoscopically-dengenerate zero-energy modes. The model can be regarded as a counterpart of the Aubry-Andr\'{e}-Harper (AAH) model, which is a paradigmatic example of the quasi-periodic tight-binding model. Our main focus is on the many-body state where the flat-band-like degenerate zero-energy modes are fully occupied. We find a characteristic sublattice dependence of the particle density distribution. Further, by analyzing the hyperuniformity of the particle density distribution, we find that it belongs to the class-I hyperuniform distribution, regardless of the model parameter. We also show that, upon changing the parameter, the finite-energy modes exhibit the same extended-to-localized transition as that for the original AAH model.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.08450 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Schematic figures of (a) a saw-tooth lattice and (b) the MO [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Schematic figure of the compact localized state of Eq. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Energy spectrum of the finite-energy modes of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (8 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. The real space particle density distribution (the upper row) and its histogram (the lower row). The parameters are (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. The real space particle density distribution (the upper row) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Sublattice-resolved filling fraction as a function of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. The results for the hyperuniformity analysis for (a) the entire charge distribution, (b) the charge distribution for the A sublattice, and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Probability density for the lowest-finite-energy mode for (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. IPR for the degenerate zero modes [Eq. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. (a) Schematic figures of the diamond chain model and (b) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. The real space particle density distribution for the diamond [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_11.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

53 extracted references · 46 canonical work pages

  1. [39]

    Sakai, R

    S. Sakai, R. Arita, and T. Ohtsuki, Hyperuniform electron dis- tributions controlled by electron interactions in quasicrystals, Phys. Rev. B105, 054202 (2022)

    work page 2022

  2. [1]

    Sutherland, Localization of electronic wave functions due to local topology, Phys

    B. Sutherland, Localization of electronic wave functions due to local topology, Phys. Rev. B34, 5208 (1986)

    1986

  3. [2]

    As is the case of the orig- inal definitions [36], we regard that the distribution belongs to the class-I hyperuniformity if ¯B(R)converges to the con- stant value asRincreases, and we call the value ¯B(R→ ∞) the order metric. Note that the value of the order metric in 5 (a2) (a3) (b2) (b3) (c2) (c3) 1 10 100 100010-6 10-5 10-4 0.001 0.010 R A(R) 510 5010...

    work page

  4. [3]

    Mielke, Ferromagnetism in the Hubbard model on line graphs and further considerations, Journal of Physics A: Math- ematical and General24, 3311 (1991)

    A. Mielke, Ferromagnetism in the Hubbard model on line graphs and further considerations, Journal of Physics A: Math- ematical and General24, 3311 (1991)

    work page 1991

  5. [4]

    Tasaki, Ferromagnetism in the Hubbard models with degen- erate single-electron ground states, Phys

    H. Tasaki, Ferromagnetism in the Hubbard models with degen- erate single-electron ground states, Phys. Rev. Lett.69, 1608 (1992)

    work page 1992

  6. [5]

    Schulenburg, A

    J. Schulenburg, A. Honecker, J. Schnack, J. Richter, and H.-J. Schmidt, Macroscopic Magnetization Jumps due to Indepen- dent Magnons in Frustrated Quantum Spin Lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett.88, 167207 (2002)

    work page 2002

  7. [6]

    M. E. Zhitomirsky and H. Tsunetsugu, Exact low-temperature behavior of a kagom´e antiferromagnet at high fields, Phys. Rev. B70, 100403 (2004)

    work page 2004

  8. [7]

    D. L. Bergman, C. Wu, and L. Balents, Band touching from real-space topology in frustrated hopping models, Phys. Rev. B 78, 125104 (2008)

    2008

Show all 53 references
  1. [8]

    Leykam, A

    D. Leykam, A. Andreanov, and S. Flach, Artificial flat band sys- tems: from lattice models to experiments, Advances in Physics: X3, 1473052 (2018)

    2018

  2. [9]

    Mizoguchi, Y

    T. Mizoguchi, Y . Kuno, and Y . Hatsugai, Flat band, spin-1 Dirac cone, and Hofstadter diagram in the fermionic square kagome model, Phys. Rev. B104, 035161 (2021)

    2021

  3. [10]

    M. Goda, S. Nishino, and H. Matsuda, Inverse Anderson Tran- sition Caused by Flatbands, Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 126401 (2006)

    2006

  4. [11]

    Nishino, H

    S. Nishino, H. Matsuda, and M. Goda, Flat-Band Localization in Weakly Disordered System, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.76, 024709 (2007)

    2007

  5. [12]

    J. T. Chalker, T. S. Pickles, and P. Shukla, Anderson localiza- tion in tight-binding models with flat bands, Phys. Rev. B82, 104209 (2010)

    2010

  6. [13]

    Leykam, J

    D. Leykam, J. D. Bodyfelt, A. S. Desyatnikov, and S. Flach, Lo- calization of weakly disordered flat band states, The European Physical Journal B90, 1 (2017)

    2017

  7. [14]

    Ramachandran, A

    A. Ramachandran, A. Andreanov, and S. Flach, Chiral flat bands: Existence, engineering, and stability, Phys. Rev. B96, 161104 (2017)

    2017

  8. [15]

    Shukla, Disorder perturbed flat bands: Level density and in- verse participation ratio, Phys

    P. Shukla, Disorder perturbed flat bands: Level density and in- verse participation ratio, Phys. Rev. B98, 054206 (2018)

    2018

  9. [16]

    Shukla, Disorder perturbed flat bands

    P. Shukla, Disorder perturbed flat bands. II. Search for critical- ity, Phys. Rev. B98, 184202 (2018)

    2018

  10. [17]

    Bilitewski and R

    T. Bilitewski and R. Moessner, Disordered flat bands on the kagome lattice, Phys. Rev. B98, 235109 (2018)

    2018

  11. [18]

    Nandy, Tunable caging of excitation in decorated Lieb- ladder geometry with long-range connectivity, Chinese Physics B32, 127201 (2023)

    A. Nandy, Tunable caging of excitation in decorated Lieb- ladder geometry with long-range connectivity, Chinese Physics B32, 127201 (2023)

    2023

  12. [19]

    Y . Kim, T. ˇCadeˇz, A. Andreanov, and S. Flach, Flat band in- 9 duced metal-insulator transitions for weak magnetic flux and spin-orbit disorder, Phys. Rev. B107, 174202 (2023)

    2023

  13. [20]

    Mallick, N

    A. Mallick, N. Chang, W. Maimaiti, S. Flach, and A. An- dreanov, Wannier-Stark flatbands in Bravais lattices, Phys. Rev. Res.3, 013174 (2021)

    2021

  14. [21]

    Mizoguchi, Y

    T. Mizoguchi, Y . Kuno, and Y . Hatsugai, Blocking particle dy- namics in a diamond chain with spatially increasing flux, Phys. Rev. A109, 053315 (2024)

    2024

  15. [22]

    S. Lee, S. Flach, and A. Andreanov, Critical state generators from perturbed flatbands, Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science33, 073125 (2023)

    2023

  16. [23]

    Zhang, Critical regions in a one-dimensional flat band lattice with a quasi-periodic potential, Scientific Reports14, 17921 (2024)

    Y .-C. Zhang, Critical regions in a one-dimensional flat band lattice with a quasi-periodic potential, Scientific Reports14, 17921 (2024)

    2024

  17. [24]

    Hatsugai, Revisiting Flat bands and localization, Annals of Physics435, 168453 (2021), special Issue on Localisation 2020

    Y . Hatsugai, Revisiting Flat bands and localization, Annals of Physics435, 168453 (2021), special Issue on Localisation 2020

    2021

  18. [25]

    Kuroda, T

    T. Kuroda, T. Mizoguchi, H. Araki, and Y . Hatsugai, Ma- chine Learning Study on the Flat-Band States Constructed by Molecular-Orbital Representation with Randomness, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan91, 044703 (2022)

    2022

  19. [26]

    Mizoguchi and Y

    T. Mizoguchi and Y . Hatsugai, Molecular-orbital representation with random U(1) variables, Phys. Rev. B107, 094201 (2023)

    2023

  20. [27]

    Hatsugai and I

    Y . Hatsugai and I. Maruyama,Z Q topological invariants for Polyacetylene, Kagome and Pyrochlore lattices, EPL (Euro- physics Letters)95, 20003 (2011)

    2011

  21. [28]

    Hatsugai, K

    Y . Hatsugai, K. Shiraishi, and H. Aoki, Flat bands in the Weaire–Thorpe model and silicene, New Journal of Physics17, 025009 (2015)

    2015

  22. [29]

    Mizoguchi and Y

    T. Mizoguchi and Y . Hatsugai, Molecular-orbital representation of generic flat-band models, EPL (Europhysics Letters)127, 47001 (2019)

    2019

  23. [30]

    Mizoguchi and Y

    T. Mizoguchi and Y . Hatsugai, Systematic construction of topo- logical flat-band models by molecular-orbital representation, Phys. Rev. B101, 235125 (2020)

    2020

  24. [31]

    Mizoguchi and Y

    T. Mizoguchi and Y . Hatsugai, Hidden chiral symmetry for the kagome lattice and its analogs, Phys. Rev. B111, 085150 (2025)

    2025

  25. [32]

    Aubry and G

    S. Aubry and G. Andr ´e, Analyticity breaking and Anderson lo- calization in incommensurate lattices, Proceedings, VIII Inter- national Colloquium on Group-Theoretical Methods in Physics 3(1980)

    1980

  26. [33]

    P. G. Harper, Single Band Motion of Conduction Electrons in a Uniform Magnetic Field, Proceedings of the Physical Society. Section A68, 874 (1955)

    1955

  27. [34]

    Torquato and F

    S. Torquato and F. H. Stillinger, Local density fluctuations, hyperuniformity, and order metrics, Phys. Rev. E68, 041113 (2003)

    2003

  28. [35]

    C. E. Zachary and S. Torquato, Hyperuniformity in point pat- terns and two-phase random heterogeneous media, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment2009, P12015 (2009)

    2009

  29. [36]

    E. C. O ˘guz, J. E. S. Socolar, P. J. Steinhardt, and S. Torquato, Hyperuniformity of quasicrystals, Phys. Rev. B95, 054119 (2017)

    2017

  30. [37]

    Torquato, Hyperuniform states of matter, Physics Reports 745, 1 (2018)

    S. Torquato, Hyperuniform states of matter, Physics Reports 745, 1 (2018)

    2018

  31. [38]

    Chertkov, R

    E. Chertkov, R. A. DiStasio, G. Zhang, R. Car, and S. Torquato, Inverse design of disordered stealthy hyperuniform spin chains, Phys. Rev. B93, 064201 (2016)

    2016

  32. [40]

    Sakai, R

    S. Sakai, R. Arita, and T. Ohtsuki, Quantum phase transition between hyperuniform density distributions, Phys. Rev. Res.4, 033241 (2022)

    2022

  33. [41]

    Sakai, Hyperuniform electron distributions on the ammann- beenker tiling, Journal of Physics: Conference Series2461, 012002 (2023)

    S. Sakai, Hyperuniform electron distributions on the ammann- beenker tiling, Journal of Physics: Conference Series2461, 012002 (2023)

    2023

  34. [42]

    M. Hori, T. Sugimoto, Y . Hashizume, and T. Tohyama, Multifractality and Hyperuniformity in Quasicrystalline Bose–Hubbard Models with and without Disorder, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan93, 114005 (2024)

    2024

  35. [43]

    D. Chen, R. Samajdar, Y . Jiao, and S. Torquato, Anomalous suppression of large-scale density fluctuations in classical and quantum spin liquids, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences122, e2416111122 (2025)

    2025

  36. [44]

    Mizoguchi, Y

    T. Mizoguchi, Y . Kuno, and Y . Hatsugai, Construction of in- teracting flat-band models by molecular-orbital representation: Correlation functions, energy gap, and entanglement, Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics2022, 023I02 (2022)

    2022

  37. [45]

    To be precise, we define the Fibonacci sequence asF 1 = 1, F2 = 1,F n =F n−1 +F n−2 (n≥3)

  38. [46]

    Koga and S

    A. Koga and S. Sakai, Hyperuniformity in two-dimensional periodic and quasiperiodic point patterns, Phys. Rev. E109, 044103 (2024)

    2024

  39. [47]

    A. Koga, S. Sakai, Y . Matsushita, and T. Ishimasa, Hyperuni- form properties of square-triangle tilings, Phys. Rev. B110, 094208 (2024)

    2024

  40. [48]

    Kohmoto, Metal-Insulator Transition and Scaling for In- commensurate Systems, Phys

    M. Kohmoto, Metal-Insulator Transition and Scaling for In- commensurate Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.51, 1198 (1983)

    1983

  41. [49]

    Kohmoto, L

    M. Kohmoto, L. P. Kadanoff, and C. Tang, Localization Prob- lem in One Dimension: Mapping and Escape, Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 1870 (1983)

    1983

  42. [50]

    Ostlund, R

    S. Ostlund, R. Pandit, D. Rand, H. J. Schellnhuber, and E. D. Siggia, One-Dimensional Schr¨odinger Equation with an Almost Periodic Potential, Phys. Rev. Lett.50, 1873 (1983)

    1983

  43. [51]

    Hatsugai, M

    Y . Hatsugai, M. Kohmoto, and Y .-S. Wu, Explicit Solutions of the Bethe Ansatz Equations for Bloch Electrons in a Magnetic Field, Phys. Rev. Lett.73, 1134 (1994)

    1994

  44. [52]

    Hatsugai, M

    Y . Hatsugai, M. Kohmoto, and Y .-S. Wu, Quantum group, Bethe ansatz equations, and Bloch wave functions in magnetic fields, Phys. Rev. B53, 9697 (1996)

    1996

  45. [53]

    Kohmoto, Zero modes and the quantized Hall conductance of the two-dimensional lattice in a magnetic field, Phys

    M. Kohmoto, Zero modes and the quantized Hall conductance of the two-dimensional lattice in a magnetic field, Phys. Rev. B 39, 11943 (1989)

    1989

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.