Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 47 references

Atomic to mesoscale hierarchical structures and magnetic states in an anisotropic layered ferromagnet FePd2Te2

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read The intrinsic twinning domains of the layered ferromagnet FePd2Te2 create compressive and tensile regions whose different magnetic moments produce a hierarchy of structure-locked magnetic states, including a polarized ferromagnetic state…

desk verdict New real-space structural hierarchy in FePd2Te2, but the magnetic-state claims need MFM controls before they carry the weight. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.08773 v1 pith:2OJQGKPG submitted 2025-06-10 cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.mes-hall

classification cond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.mes-hall PACS 75.60.Ch75.30.Gw68.37.Ps75.70.-i
keywords FePd2Te2two-dimensionalferromagnettwinningdomainsmagneticforcemicroscopystrain-modulatedmagnetismcompressiveandtensilestrainphasediagramin-planeanisotropy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper sets out to show that the layered ferromagnet FePd2Te2 carries an intrinsic structural hierarchy—orthogonal twinning domains made of quasi-one-dimensional Fe zigzag chains—and that the compressive and tensile regions this twinning creates directly shape the material's magnetic states. Combining atomic-scale STM, topographic AFM, magnetic force microscopy, and bulk magnetization, it correlates the atomic Fe-chain pattern with mesoscale corrugations and with magnetic-domain contrast. It claims that the different moments in compressive and tensile regions survive as distinct magnetic contrast under a saturating field (a polarized-FM state) and even above the Curie temperature (a polarized-PM state), and it summarizes the resulting behavior in an H-T phase diagram. A sympathetic reader cares because this would establish structure engineering—twinning and strain, not just chemistry—as a practical control knob for two-dimensional magnetism.

What carries the argument

The central object is the twinning-domain strain landscape: orthogonal Fe-zigzag chain domains in the layered lattice produce alternating compressive and tensile regions because the Young's modulus is large along the chains and small perpendicular to them. That strain landscape does the argument's work—it sets the corrugated topography, distinguishes intact (C) from fragmented (T) Fe chains, assigns different local moments and anisotropy to the two regions, and thereby explains why magnetic contrast tracks the structure even after saturation and above TC.

What would settle it

Image the same FePd2Te2 regions at 230 K under 2 T with a nonmagnetic or reversely magnetized MFM tip; if the rippled phase pattern persists unchanged, the polarized-PM claim collapses. A clean alternative is to scan the identical area with an NV-center or Lorentz microscopy probe that is insensitive to topography and show that the structure-correlated contrast above TC disappears.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

In FePd2Te2, monoclinic P21/m crystals naturally form twinning domains in which the Fe-zigzag chains rotate by 90°; because bonding is stiff along a chain and soft across it, the domain mismatch relaxes into periodic corrugated compressive (C) and tensile (T) regions that are visible all the way from high-resolution STM (intact versus fragmented Fe chains) to tens-of-micrometre AFM stripes. The paper's central experimental claim is that these C and T regions carry different magnetic moments and reorient differently under field: at ~0.4 T the in-plane moments flop out of plane, T regions show a gradual spin-flop, C regions an abrupt spin-flip-like switch, and the C/T contrast persists in a polarized-FM state up to 2 T. Above the 183 K transition the same structure-related contrast appears under field or field-cooling, defining a polarized-PM state. The paper condenses the temperature- and field-dependent evolution into an H-T phase diagram whose phases all inherit their identity from the hierarchical twinning structure.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the MFM contrast at high field and above TC is magnetic rather than topographic or electrostatic crosstalk, since the tip scans ~100 nm above a ~10 nm corrugated surface and no topography-subtracted or independent-probe control is shown.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the C/T strain pattern dictates the magnetic domains, then topography images of FePd2Te2 can be used to predict where high- and low-moment regions sit and how they will reorient in a field.
  • The persistent polarized-FM contrast at 2 T means the saturated state is not a uniform ferromagnet; local moment differences remain, so magnetometry and MFM measure different aspects of the same phase.
  • The polarized-PM state above TC implies that field-cooling can imprint a structure-defined moment pattern in a nominally paramagnetic regime, which may be recoverable as a memory state.
  • The ~0.4 T spin-flop crossover and the distinct C/T switching behaviors provide a mesoscale mechanism for the kinks and hysteresis seen in the bulk M-H curves.
  • The broad 100–120 K susceptibility feature and the blurring of MFM contrast in that range are attributed to an anisotropy-fluctuation crossover tied to the C/T regions, connecting local structure to macroscopic magnetic response.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Going beyond the paper, the same C/T twinning mechanism could explain the fourfold anisotropic magnetoresistance reported for twinned FePd2Te2, since the orthogonal domains give two inequivalent conduction and spin channels that would respond differently to field orientation.
  • A quantitative test that the paper leaves open: calculating how much tensile strain reduces the Fe moment (via chain fragmentation or exchange weakening) and comparing that reduction with the observed MFM phase asymmetry between C and T regions would turn the correlation into a calibrated strain-moment coupling.
  • The corrugation wavelength and ~10 nm amplitude suggest the twin-boundary strain field extends far beyond a single domain wall; nanoscale strain-gradient mapping on the same crystals could quantify the coupling strength and guide strain-engineering of other in-plane anisotropic 2D magnets.
  • If the polarized-PM state is generic, similar field-induced structure-locked contrast should appear in other twinned in-plane 2D ferromagnets; a comparative MFM survey of such compounds would test the mechanism's scope beyond FePd2Te2.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports a real-space study of the layered anisotropic ferromagnet FePd2Te2 using AFM, STM, and MFM, combined with bulk magnetization measurements. The authors observe hierarchical twinning-domain structures from the atomic to mesoscale, identify compressive (C) and tensile (T) regions associated with Fe-chain integrity, and interpret MFM contrast as reflecting strain-modulated local magnetic moments. They propose field-induced transitions from an intact ferromagnetic state to a polarized-FM state below Tc, and a polarized-PM state above Tc, culminating in an H-T phase diagram. The core assertion is that intrinsic twinning domains directly couple to magnetic moments, producing distinct magnetic phases tied to C/T regions.

Significance. If the magnetic interpretation is correct, the paper would establish a direct atomic-to-mesoscale structure-magnetism coupling in a 2D in-plane anisotropic magnet, with potential implications for strain engineering of magnetic states. The structural observations (STM atomic resolution of orthogonal Fe chains, AFM corrugations, domain boundaries) are internally consistent and appear robust. The manuscript contains no parameter fitting or circular derivation, and the phase diagram is a useful summary of the proposed phenomenology. However, the central magnetic-state claims rest on MFM contrast that has not been separated from topographic and electrostatic crosstalk, and the paper does not provide an independent magnetic probe or a quantitative error analysis of the phase shifts. The significance is therefore conditional on resolving these methodological gaps.

major comments (3)
  1. [Materials and Methods (MFM), Fig. 3g-j, Fig. 5a,b] The polarized-FM and polarized-PM states are inferred from constant-height MFM phase contrast acquired at a nominal lift of ~100 nm over surfaces with ~10 nm vertical corrugations (Fig. S1). In constant-height mode the tip-sample gap varies by the full corrugation amplitude, so any distance-dependent non-magnetic interaction (electrostatic patches, van der Waals, capacitive forces) will produce phase contrast correlated with the C/T topography. The manuscript provides no control measurement with a non-magnetic tip at the same lift height, no lift-height series to establish the magnetic distance scaling of the C/T phase difference, and no independent magnetic probe (NV, SQUID, or local MOKE) co-registered to the same regions. These controls are necessary to support the claims that 'magnetic contrast persists under the saturation field' (Fig. 3g-j) and that 'structure-related magnetic contrast is observed even in the PM state' (Fig. 5a,b). Without them, the unique polarized states and the H-T phase diagram are not fully supported.
  2. [Fig. 3j and Fig. S4] The field-dependent MFM phase shifts of C and T regions in Fig. 3j are presented as lines without error bars, number of regions averaged, or statistical spread. The claim that C regions undergo an abrupt 'spin-flip-like' reorientation while T regions exhibit a gradual 'spin-flop-like' transition is load-bearing for the proposed distinct magnetic responses of the two regions. The extraction procedure described in Fig. S4 must quantify the scatter across the many C/T regions visible in the images, otherwise the distinction may reflect image noise or tip-state drift rather than a physical difference.
  3. [Fig. 2g,h and Section 'Results and discussion'] The assignment of C and T domains is based on the preservation or disruption of Fe chains after a short thermal treatment, with the identification drawn from prior work (refs 28, 32). This labeling is then used to interpret the magnetic contrast in the as-cleaved or field-cycled samples. If the C/T assignment depends on the thermal history or on the same twinning structure that produces the corrugations, the connection to the local magnetic moment should be validated independently, for example by correlating STM-observed chain integrity with MFM phase on the same length scale or by a strain-sensitive diffraction measurement. As written, the C/T labels are partly inferred and not directly confirmed on the exact regions where the magnetic phase shifts are extracted.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Fig. 5 caption] The caption contains a duplicated line: '(d,e) Histograms of MFM images in (a) and (b), respectively.' appears twice. Remove the redundant sentence.
  2. [Section 'Results and discussion' (Fig. 2f)] The text states that STM was conducted at ~10 K, but the description of Fig. 2f says 'at liquid nitrogen temperature.' Clarify the actual measurement temperature for this image.
  3. [Section 'Results and discussion' (Fig. 3a,b)] The transition temperature is reported as both 'around 180 K' and 'TC = 183 K.' Use a single consistent value with the uncertainty from the dM/dT analysis.
  4. [Abstract and Conclusions] The phrase 'unique H-T phase diagram' is used in the abstract and conclusions, but the phase diagram in Fig. 5f is a schematic with only three regions and no field/temperature error bars. Qualify it as a schematic phase diagram unless quantitative boundaries are provided.
  5. [References] References include several arXiv preprints (refs 27, 32) and are formatted inconsistently (e.g., ref 29 lacks page numbers). Please ensure all references are complete and, where possible, updated to published versions.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the structural and magnetic-state claims rest on direct AFM/STM/MFM/M-H measurements, not on fitted parameters or self-cited theorems.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is observational rather than derivational: hierarchical twinning domains and C/T regions are directly imaged by AFM and STM, and the FM, polarized-FM, and polarized-PM states are labels applied to measured MFM contrast and magnetization data. No parameter is fitted and then renamed as a prediction; no equation is constructed so that an output equals an input by definition. The C/T moment interpretation is an inference from observed MFM contrast plus cited external strain-magnetism studies, not a reduction of the conclusion to its premise. Self-citations (e.g., refs. 28 and 32) supply the prior identification of FePd2Te2 and twinned anisotropic magnetoresistance, but the present real-space observations stand independently of those citations, and the paper explicitly notes that quantitative theoretical understanding remains open. The main scientific risk, that constant-height MFM at ~100 nm lift over ~10 nm corrugations may include topographic or electrostatic crosstalk, is a control/validity concern rather than a circularity; it does not make the magnetic-state claims equivalent to their inputs by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper is observational; it fits no numerical parameters and introduces no new physical entities. Its central claims rest on standard microscopy interpretations, on the prior structural and magnetic characterization of FePd2Te2, and on the unverified assumption that the MFM signal is free of topographic crosstalk on this corrugated surface.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption MFM phase shift is proportional to the out-of-plane stray field gradient and reflects magnetic structure near the surface.
    Stated in Methods: 'The MFM signal, i.e., the change in the cantilever phase, was proportional to the out-of-plane stray field gradient.' Standard MFM interpretation, but relies on the tip-sample distance being controlled and magnetic coupling dominating.
  • domain assumption At about 100 nm lift height, the MFM signal is not significantly contaminated by topography or electrostatic forces from the about 10 nm surface corrugations.
    The paper reports corrugations of about 10 nm height (Supplementary Figure S1) yet uses constant-height MFM without a demonstrated topography-subtraction control, so this assumption is load-bearing for the magnetic contrast claims.
  • domain assumption Compressive (C) and tensile (T) domains can be identified by intact versus broken Fe chains after short-time thermal treatment.
    The paper labels C and T regions based on chain stability (Figure 2g,h) and cites refs 32-35, including a preprint with overlapping authorship (Chen, Yang, Guo). No independent strain calibration is provided.
  • domain assumption Fe zigzag chains define an in-plane easy axis along [101] with quasi-1D spin character, and twinning rotates this axis by 90 degrees.
    This is taken from the group's prior work on FePd2Te2 (ref 28) and underlies the interpretation of orthogonal magnetic domains. It is consistent with the present STM images but is not re-derived here.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Atomic to mesoscale hierarchical structures and magnetic states in an anisotropic layered ferromagnet FePd2Te2." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2OJQGKPG

@misc{pith2026250608773,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Atomic to mesoscale hierarchical structures and magnetic states in an anisotropic layered ferromagnet FePd2Te2},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2OJQGKPG}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.08773}
}
read the original abstract

Two-dimensional (2D) magnetic materials have predominantly exhibited easy-axis or easy-plane anisotropy and display a high sensitivity to the underlying crystal structure and lattice symmetry. Recently, an in-plane anisotropic 2D ferromagnet of FePd2Te2 has been discovered with intriguing structure and quasi-one-dimensional spin system. Here, we report a real-space investigation of its twinning structure and magnetic states using atomic/magnetic force microscopy (AFM/MFM) combined with scanning tunneling microscopy (STM). The atomic to mesoscale hierarchical structures with the orthogonal and corrugated compressive /tensile(C/T) regions are directly observed due to the intrinsic twinning-domain characteristic. The structure-related intact ferromagnetic (FM), field-induced polarized-FM states and their transitions are comparatively discussed at the mesoscale with the corresponding macroscopic magnetic measurements. Temperature- and field-dependent evolution of magnetic phase are further investigated at the FM and PM states, and summarized to obtain a unique H-T phase diagram of FePd2Te2. Our work provides key results for understanding the complicated magnetic properties of FePd2Te2, and suggests new directions for manipulating magnetic states through the atomic and mesoscale structure engineering.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.08773 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Crystal structures of anisotropic layered [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Mesoscale AFM topography and atomic STM structure measurements of FePd [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Magnetic properties and MFM measurements of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Temperature-dependent magnetic susceptibility and MFM measurements of FePd2Te2. (a) Temperature-dependent AC magnetic susceptibility measured under the magnetic field, indicating a clear PM-FM transition and broad magnetic crossover at ~183 K. The inset shows an enlarg…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Field-polarized spin textures at the PM state of FePd2Te2. (a) Field-dependent MFM images from PM to polarized-PM state at 230 K. (b) Temperature-dependent MFM images after field cooling under 0.5 T, illustrating the transition from PM to polarized-FM state. (c) Schema…

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

47 extracted references · 47 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Q.; Cava, R

    Gong, C.; Li, L.; Li, Z.; Ji, H.; Stern, A.; Xia, Y .; Cao, T.; Bao, W.; Wang, C.; Wang, Y .; Qiu, Z. Q.; Cava, R. J.; Louie, S. G.; Xia, J.; Zhang, X. Discovery of Intrinsic Ferromagnetism in Two-Dimensional van der Waals Crystals. Nature 2017, 546, 265–269

  2. [2]

    S.; Mandrus, D.; Park, J.-G

    Burch, K. S.; Mandrus, D.; Park, J.-G. Magnetism in Two-Dimensional van der Waals Materials. Nature 2018, 563, 47–52

  3. [3]

    Two -Dimensional Non -van der Waals Magnetic Layers: Functional Materials for Potential Device Applications

    Jin, C.; Kou, L. Two -Dimensional Non -van der Waals Magnetic Layers: Functional Materials for Potential Device Applications. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 2021, 54, 413001

  4. [4]

    Coexisting Ferromagnetic–Antiferromagnetic Phases and Manipulation in a Magnetic Topological Insulator MnBi₄Te₇

    Guo, J.; Wang, H.; Wang, X.; Gu, S.; Mi, S.; Zhu, S.; Hu, J.; Pang, F.; Ji, W.; Gao, H.; Xia, T.; Cheng, Z. Coexisting Ferromagnetic–Antiferromagnetic Phases and Manipulation in a Magnetic Topological Insulator MnBi₄Te₇. J. Phys. Chem. C 2022, 126, 13884–13893

  5. [5]

    Interlayer Coupling Modulated Tunable Magnetic States in Superlattice MnBi₂Te₄(Bi₂Te₃)ₙ Topological Insulators

    Guo, J.; Wang, H.; Zhang, H.; Mi, S.; Li, S.; Dong, H.; Zhu, S.; Hu, J.; Wang, X.; Li, Y .; Sugawara, Y .; Xu, R.; Pang, F.; Ji, W.; Xia, T.; Cheng, Z. Interlayer Coupling Modulated Tunable Magnetic States in Superlattice MnBi₂Te₄(Bi₂Te₃)ₙ Topological Insulators. Phys. Rev. B 2024, 109, 165410

  6. [6]

    Real -Space Topology-Engineering of Skyrmionic Spin Textures in a van der Waals Ferromagnet Fe₃GaTe₂

    Mi, S.; Guo, J.; Hu, G.; Wang, G.; Li, S.; Gong, Z.; Jin, S.; Xu, R.; Pang, F.; Ji, W.; Yu, W.; Wang, X.; Wang, X.; Yang, H.; Cheng, Z. Real -Space Topology-Engineering of Skyrmionic Spin Textures in a van der Waals Ferromagnet Fe₃GaTe₂. Nano Lett. 2024, 24, 13094–13102

  7. [7]

    R.; Cheng, R.; Seyler, K

    Huang, B.; Clark, G.; Navarro -Moratalla, E.; Klein, D. R.; Cheng, R.; Seyler, K. L.; Zhong, D.; Schmidgall, E.; McGuire, M. A.; Cobden, D. H.; Yao, W.; Xiao, D.; Jarillo-Herrero, P.; Xu, X. Layer- Dependent Ferromagnetism in a van der Waals Crystal Down to the Monolayer Limit. Nature 2017, 546, 270–273

  8. [8]

    F.; Shan, J

    Jiang, S.; Li, L.; Wang, Z.; Mak, K. F.; Shan, J. Controlling Magnetism in 2D CrI₃ by Electrostatic Doping. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2018, 13, 549–553

Show all 47 references
  1. [9]

    Z.; Sun, Z.; Yi, Y .; Wu, Y

    Deng, Y .; Y u, Y .; Song, Y .; Zhang, J.; Wang, N. Z.; Sun, Z.; Yi, Y .; Wu, Y . Z.; Wu, S.; Zhu, J.; Wang, J.; Chen, X. H.; Zhang, Y . Gate -Tunable Room -Temperature Ferromagnetism in Two -Dimensional Fe₃GeTe₂. Nature 2018, 563, 94–99

  2. [10]

    K.; Gargiani, P.; Valvidares, M.; Sessi, P.; Taylor, J

    Bedoya-Pinto, A.; Ji, J.-R.; Pandeya, A. K.; Gargiani, P.; Valvidares, M.; Sessi, P.; Taylor, J. M.; Radu, F.; Chang, K.; Parkin, S. S. P . Intrinsic 2D-XY Ferromagnetism in a van der Waals Monolayer. Science 2021, 374, 616–620

  3. [11]

    Boix-Constant, C.; Jenkins, S.; Rama -Eiroa, R.; Santos, E. J. G.; Maas -Valero, S.; Coronado, E. Multistep Magnetization Switching in Orthogonally Twisted Ferromagnetic Monolayers. Nat. Mater. 2023, 23, 212–218

  4. [12]

    J.; Dismukes, A

    Telford, E. J.; Dismukes, A. H.; Lee, K.; Cheng, M.; Wieteska, A.; Bartholomew, A. K.; Chen, Y .; Xu, X.; Pasupathy, A. N.; Zhu, X.; Dean, C. R.; Roy, X. Layered Antiferromagnetism Induces Large Negative Magnetoresistance in the van der Waals Semiconductor CrSBr. Adv. Mater. 2...

  5. [13]

    Wang, Z.; Gibertini, M.; Dumcenco, D.; Taniguchi, T.; Watanabe, K.; Giannini, E.; Morpurgo, A. F. Determining the Phase Diagram of Atomically Thin Layered Antiferromagnet CrCl₃. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2019, 14, 1116–1122. 21

  6. [14]

    P.; Clark, G.; He, M.; Zhang, X.; Taniguchi, T.; Watanabe, K.; Yao, W.; Xiao, D.; McGuire, M

    Cai, X.; Song, T.; Wilson, N. P.; Clark, G.; He, M.; Zhang, X.; Taniguchi, T.; Watanabe, K.; Yao, W.; Xiao, D.; McGuire, M. A.; Cobden, D. H.; Xu, X. Atomically Thin CrCl₃: An In -Plane Layered Antiferromagnetic Insulator. Nano Lett. 2019, 19, 3993–3998

  7. [15]

    J.; Dismukes, A

    Telford, E. J.; Dismukes, A. H.; Dudley, R. L.; Wiscons, R. A.; Lee, K.; Chica, D. G.; Ziebel, M. E.; Han, M.-G.; Yu, J.; Shabani, S.; Scheie, A.; Watanabe, K.; Taniguchi, T.; Xiao, D.; Zhu, Y .; Pasupathy, A. N.; Nuckolls, C.; Zhu, X.; Dean, C. R.; Roy, X. Coupling between Ma...

  8. [16]

    Modulation of Magnetic Domain and the Occurrence of Antisymmetric Magnetoresistance in the Folded van der Waals Ferromagnet Fe₃GaTe₂

    Gao, X.; Wang, K.; Zhai, K.; Yan, J.; Yue, D.; Mu, C.; Yu, Z.; Cheng, Y .; Nie, A.; Liu, Z. Modulation of Magnetic Domain and the Occurrence of Antisymmetric Magnetoresistance in the Folded van der Waals Ferromagnet Fe₃GaTe₂. Adv. Mater. 2025, 37, 2420505

  9. [17]

    -W.; Wang, X

    Jin, S.; Liu, Y .; Deng, Z.; Wang, T.; Xu, S.; Chen, X.; Jiang, C.; Liang, J.; Hong, J.; Cheong, S. -W.; Wang, X. Strain Gradient Induced Skyrmion in a van der Waals Magnet by Wrinkling. Adv. Mater. 2025, 37, 2501935

  10. [18]

    Strain and Electric-Field Control of Spin– Spin Interactions in Monolayer CrI₃

    Izadi Vishkayi, S.; Torbatian, Z.; Qaiumzadeh, A.; Asgari, R. Strain and Electric-Field Control of Spin– Spin Interactions in Monolayer CrI₃. Phys. Rev. Mater. 2020, 4, 094004

  11. [19]

    A.; Kirby, B

    Guo, E.-J.; Desautels, R.; Keavney, D.; Roldan, M. A.; Kirby, B. J.; Lee, D.; Liao, Z.; Charlton, T.; Herklotz, A.; Ward, T. Z.; Fitzsimmons, M. R.; Lee, H. N. Nanoscale Ferroelastic Twins Formed in Strained LaCoO₃ Films. Sci. Adv. 2019, 5, eaav5050

  12. [20]

    Two-Dimensional Multiferroic Material of Metallic p-Doped SnSe

    Du, R.; Wang, Y .; Cheng, M.; Wang, P.; Li, H.; Feng, W.; Song, L.; Shi, J.; He, J. Two-Dimensional Multiferroic Material of Metallic p-Doped SnSe. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 6130

  13. [21]

    J.; Ma, Z

    Wang, Y .; Wang, C.; Liang, S. J.; Ma, Z. C.; Xu, K.; Liu, X. W.; Zhang, L. L.; Admasu, A. S.; Cheong, S. W.; Wang, L. Z.; Chen, M. Y .; Liu, Z. L.; Cheng, B.; Ji, W.; Miao, F. Strain-Sensitive Magnetization Reversal of a van der Waals Magnet. Adv. Mater. 2020, 32, 2004533

  14. [22]

    O.; Das, T.; Mandal, P.; Pal, A

    Pal, R.; Pal, B.; Mondal, S.; Sharma, R. O.; Das, T.; Mandal, P.; Pal, A. N. Spin-Reorientation Driven Emergent Phases and Unconventional Magnetotransport in Quasi-2D vdW Ferromagnet Fe₄GeTe₂. npj 2D Mater. Appl. 2024, 8, 30

  15. [23]

    Strain-Induced Magnetic Phase Transition, Magnetic Anisotropy Switching and Bilayer Antiferromagnetic Skyrmions in van der Waals Magnet CrTe₂

    Deng, D.; Shen, D.; Xue, Y .; Guan, Z.; Xiao, R.; Song, C. Strain-Induced Magnetic Phase Transition, Magnetic Anisotropy Switching and Bilayer Antiferromagnetic Skyrmions in van der Waals Magnet CrTe₂. Nanoscale 2023, 15, 1561–1567

  16. [24]

    Strain-Tunable Magnetic Anisotropy in Monolayer CrCl₃, CrBr₃, and CrI₃

    Webster, L.; Yan, J.-A. Strain-Tunable Magnetic Anisotropy in Monolayer CrCl₃, CrBr₃, and CrI₃. Phys. Rev. B 2018, 98, 144411

  17. [25]

    V .; Awano, H.; Ando, A.; Toyoki, K.; Kotani, Y .; Nakamura, T.; Koyama, T.; Chiba, D

    Ota, S.; Thach, P. V .; Awano, H.; Ando, A.; Toyoki, K.; Kotani, Y .; Nakamura, T.; Koyama, T.; Chiba, D. Strain-Induced Modulation of Temperature Characteristics in Ferrimagnetic Tb–Fe Films. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 6237

  18. [26]

    Mukherjee, T.; Chowdhury, S.; Jana, D.; Lew Yan V oon, L. C. Strain-Induced Electronic and Magnetic Properties of 2D Magnet CrI₃: A DFT Approach. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 2019, 31 (33), 335802

  19. [27]

    M.; Shumilin, A.; Dey, S.; López‑Alcalá, D.; Baldoví, J

    Ruiz, A. M.; Shumilin, A.; Dey, S.; López‑Alcalá, D.; Baldoví, J. J. Tunable Itinerant Ferromagnetism in the Two‑Dimensional FePd2Te2 Hosting 1D Spin Chains. arXiv 2025, arXiv:2506.01009. 22

  20. [28]

    FePd2Te2: An Anisotropic Two-Dimensional Ferromagnet with One -Dimensional Fe Chains

    Shi, B.; Geng, Y .; Wang, H.; Yang, J.; Shang, C.; Wang, M.; Mi, S.; Huang, J.; Pan, F.; Gui, X.; Wang, J.; Liu, J.; Xu, D.; Zhang, H.; Qin, J.; Wang, H.; Hao, L.; Tian, M.; Cheng, Z.; Zheng, G.; Cheng, P. FePd2Te2: An Anisotropic Two-Dimensional Ferromagnet with One -Dimensio...

  21. [29]

    Enhanced THz Emission and Chirality Control in van der Waals Ferromagnetic FePd 2Te2/Pt Heterostructures

    Zhang, J.; Shi, B.; Xu, H.; Song, Y .; Zou, Y .; Li, Z.; Dai, H.; Song, Y .; Jin, Q.; Cheng, P.; Jin, Z.; Zhang, Z. Enhanced THz Emission and Chirality Control in van der Waals Ferromagnetic FePd 2Te2/Pt Heterostructures. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2025, 147

  22. [30]

    Anisotropic Mechanical Properties of Black Phosphorus Nanoribbons

    Chen, H.; Huang, P.; Guo, D.; Xie, G. Anisotropic Mechanical Properties of Black Phosphorus Nanoribbons. J. Phys. Chem. C 2016, 120, 29491–29497

  23. [31]

    P .; Dorini, T

    Ferreira, P. P .; Dorini, T. T.; Santos, F. B.; Machado, A. J. S.; Eleno, L. T. F. Elastic Anisotropy and Thermal Properties of Extended Linear Chain Compounds MV₂Ga₄ (M = Sc, Zr, Hf) from Ab Initio Calculations. Materialia 2018, 4, 529-539

  24. [32]

    Fourfold Anisotropic Magnetoresistance and Unconventional Critical Exponents in Twinned FePd₂Te₂

    Chen, Z.; Yang, Y .; Guo, J. Fourfold Anisotropic Magnetoresistance and Unconventional Critical Exponents in Twinned FePd₂Te₂. arXiv 2024, arXiv:2411.15842

  25. [33]

    Mechanical Origin of Martensite -Like Structures in Two - Dimensional ReS₂

    Huang, L.; Zheng, F.; Chen, H.; et al. Mechanical Origin of Martensite -Like Structures in Two - Dimensional ReS₂. Commun. Mater. 2021, 2, 87

  26. [34]

    Physics Infused Machine Learning Force Fields for 2D Materials Monolayers

    Yang, Y .; Xu, B.; Zong, H. Physics Infused Machine Learning Force Fields for 2D Materials Monolayers. J. Mater. Inf. 2023, 3, 23

  27. [35]

    Recent Progress on 2D Magnets: Fundamental Mechanism, Structural Design and Modification

    Jiang, X.; Liu, Q.; Xing, J.; Liu, N.; Guo, Y .; Liu, Z.; Zhao, J. Recent Progress on 2D Magnets: Fundamental Mechanism, Structural Design and Modification. Appl. Phys. Rev. 2021, 8, 031305

  28. [36]

    Kong, D.; Kovács, A.; Charilaou, M.; Zheng, F.; Wang, L.; Han, X.; Dunin -Borkowski, R. E. Direct Observation of Tensile-Strain-Induced Nanoscale Magnetic Hardening. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 3963

  29. [37]

    M.; Kalaboukhov, A.; Svedlindh, P.; Sanyal, B.; Dash, S

    Ngaloy, R.; Zhao, B.; Ershadrad, S.; Gupta, R.; Davoudiniya, M.; Bainsla, L.; Sjöström, L.; Hoque, A. M.; Kalaboukhov, A.; Svedlindh, P.; Sanyal, B.; Dash, S. P. Strong In -Plane Magnetization and Spin Polarization in (Co₀.₁₅Fe₀.₈₅)₅GeTe₂/Graphene van der W aals Heterostructur...

  30. [38]

    E.; Butera, A.; Vavassori, P.; Steren, L

    Román, A.; Gómez, J. E.; Butera, A.; Vavassori, P.; Steren, L. B. Magnetization Reversal and Direct Observation of Magnetic Domains on FePt Thin Films. In 2024 IEEE International Magnetic Conference - Short Papers (INTERMAG Short Papers); Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2024

  31. [39]

    Milde, P.; Köhler, L.; Neuber, E.; Ritzinger, P.; Garst, M.; Bauer, A.; Pfleiderer, C.; Berger, H.; Eng, L. M. Field -Induced Reorientation of Helimagnetic Order in Cu₂OSeO₃ Probed by Magnetic Force Microscopy. Phys. Rev. B 2020, 102, 024426

  32. [40]

    C.; Bertran, F.; Le Fèvre, P.; Turban, P.; Jacquot, J.-F.; Miwa, J

    Bigi, C.; Jego, C.; Polewczyk, V .; De Vita, A.; Jaouen, T.; Tchouekem, H. C.; Bertran, F.; Le Fèvre, P.; Turban, P.; Jacquot, J.-F.; Miwa, J. A.; Clark, O. J.; Jana, A.; Chaluvadi, S. K.; Orgiani, P.; Cuoco, M.; Leandersson, M.; Balasubramanian, T.; Olsen, T.; Hwang, Y .; Jam...

  33. [41]

    U.; Choudary, G

    Bhasker, S. U.; Choudary, G. S. V . R. K.; Reddy, M. V . R. Modulation in Magnetic Exchange Interaction, Core Shell Structure and Hopkinson’s Peak with Chromium Substitution into Ni₀.₇₅Co₀.₂₅Fe₂O₄ 23 Nanoparticles. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2018, 454, 349–355

  34. [42]

    G.; Wang, Y .; et al

    Zhu, M.; Li, P. G.; Wang, Y .; et al. Temperature- and Field-Driven Spin Reorientations in Triple-Layer Ruthenate Sr₄Ru₃O₁₀. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 3914

  35. [43]

    Dorantes-Dávila, J.; Garibay -Alonso, R.; Pastor, G. M. Spin -Fluctuation Theory of Temperature - Driven Spin Reorientations in Ferromagnetic Transition Metal Thin Films. Phys. Rev. B 2024, 110, 174406

  36. [44]

    Metadynamics Study of the Temperature Dependence of Magnetic Anisotropy and Spin-Reorientation Transitions in Ultrathin Films

    Nagyfalusi, B.; Udvardi, L.; Szunyogh, L. Metadynamics Study of the Temperature Dependence of Magnetic Anisotropy and Spin-Reorientation Transitions in Ultrathin Films. Phys. Rev. B 2019, 100, 174429

  37. [45]

    Temperature-Driven Spin Reorientation Transition in Van der Waals Cr₁.₇Te₂ Ferromagnet

    Wang, S.; Wang, Z.; Jiang, J.; Zhang, Y .; Li, R.; Feng, Y .; Liu, P.; Lu, Y .; Sheng, Z.; Du, H.; Gao, N.; Xiang, B. Temperature-Driven Spin Reorientation Transition in Van der Waals Cr₁.₇Te₂ Ferromagnet. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2024, 124, 232401

  38. [46]

    Introduction to Solid State Physics, 8th ed.; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, 2005

    Kittel, C. Introduction to Solid State Physics, 8th ed.; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, 2005

  39. [47]

    D.; Graham, C

    Cullity, B. D.; Graham, C. D. Introduction to Magnetic Materials, 2nd ed.; Wiley-IEEE Press: Hoboken, NJ, 2008

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.