Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Multi-level Value Alignment in Agentic AI Systems: Survey and Perspectives

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2506.09656 v2 pith:5M7UJICR submitted 2025-06-11 cs.AI

Multi-level Value Alignment in Agentic AI Systems: Survey and Perspectives

classification cs.AI
keywords valueagenticsystemsalignmentresearchagentsapplicationscomplex
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

The ongoing evolution of AI paradigms has propelled AI research into the agentic AI stage. Consequently, the focus of research has shifted from single agents and simple applications towards multi-agent autonomous decision-making and task collaboration in complex environments. As Large Language Models (LLMs) advance, their applications become more diverse and complex, leading to increasing situational and systemic risks. This has brought significant attention to value alignment for agentic AI systems, which aims to ensure that an agent's goals, preferences, and behaviors align with human values and societal norms. Addressing socio-governance demands through a Multi-level Value framework, this study comprehensively reviews value alignment in LLM-based multi-agent systems as the representative archetype of agentic AI systems. Our survey systematically examines three interconnected dimensions: First, value principles are structured via a top-down hierarchy across macro, meso, and micro levels. Second, application scenarios are categorized along a general-to-specific continuum explicitly mirroring these value tiers. Third, value alignment methods and evaluation are mapped to this tiered framework through systematic examination of benchmarking datasets and relevant methodologies. Additionally, we delve into value coordination among multiple agents within agentic AI systems. Finally, we propose several potential research directions in this field.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Whose Good, Whose Place? The Moral Geography of Agentic AI for Social Good

    cs.CY 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Survey of 112 agentic AI for social good papers reveals moral-geographic asymmetry with 73% lacking geographic context (lowest for SDG 16) and only 25% reporting deployments.

  2. A Periodic Space of Distributed Computing: Vision & Framework

    cs.DC 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    A periodic framework is proposed to characterize, compare, and predict behaviors across distributed computing solutions by mapping system properties in a structured space inspired by the chemical periodic table.

  3. Agent Economics: An Entropy-Controlled Pluralistic Alignment Framework for Preventing Artificial Hivemind in Autonomous Agents

    cs.AI 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    Proposes an entropy-controlled pluralistic alignment framework with three modules to preserve strategic diversity and add verifiable audit trails in autonomous agent systems.