REVIEW 3 cited by
Multi-level Value Alignment in Agentic AI Systems: Survey and Perspectives
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Multi-level Value Alignment in Agentic AI Systems: Survey and Perspectives
read the original abstract
The ongoing evolution of AI paradigms has propelled AI research into the agentic AI stage. Consequently, the focus of research has shifted from single agents and simple applications towards multi-agent autonomous decision-making and task collaboration in complex environments. As Large Language Models (LLMs) advance, their applications become more diverse and complex, leading to increasing situational and systemic risks. This has brought significant attention to value alignment for agentic AI systems, which aims to ensure that an agent's goals, preferences, and behaviors align with human values and societal norms. Addressing socio-governance demands through a Multi-level Value framework, this study comprehensively reviews value alignment in LLM-based multi-agent systems as the representative archetype of agentic AI systems. Our survey systematically examines three interconnected dimensions: First, value principles are structured via a top-down hierarchy across macro, meso, and micro levels. Second, application scenarios are categorized along a general-to-specific continuum explicitly mirroring these value tiers. Third, value alignment methods and evaluation are mapped to this tiered framework through systematic examination of benchmarking datasets and relevant methodologies. Additionally, we delve into value coordination among multiple agents within agentic AI systems. Finally, we propose several potential research directions in this field.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Whose Good, Whose Place? The Moral Geography of Agentic AI for Social Good
Survey of 112 agentic AI for social good papers reveals moral-geographic asymmetry with 73% lacking geographic context (lowest for SDG 16) and only 25% reporting deployments.
-
A Periodic Space of Distributed Computing: Vision & Framework
A periodic framework is proposed to characterize, compare, and predict behaviors across distributed computing solutions by mapping system properties in a structured space inspired by the chemical periodic table.
-
Agent Economics: An Entropy-Controlled Pluralistic Alignment Framework for Preventing Artificial Hivemind in Autonomous Agents
Proposes an entropy-controlled pluralistic alignment framework with three modules to preserve strategic diversity and add verifiable audit trails in autonomous agent systems.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.