Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Influence of photon-magnon coupling to enhance spin-wave excitation

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that an inverse split-ring resonator used as a spin-wave antenna excites spin waves in a 40-nanometer permalloy film with more than four times the efficiency of a conventional microstrip line at equal feed current, with…

desk verdict Solid numerical proof-of-concept for field-enhancing spin-wave excitation, but the 'fourfold conversion efficiency' claim is not supported by the metric actually computed. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.09808 v1 pith:MAC2YHL7 submitted 2025-06-11 cond-mat.mes-hall

Liubov Ivzhenko , Sergey Polevoy , Sergey Nedukh , Maciej Krawczyk This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords photon-magnoncouplinginversesplit-ringresonatorspin-waveexcitationmicrowave-to-spin-waveconversionmicrostriptransmissionlineweakregimepermalloythinfilmmagnonics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper sets out to show that a compact planar antenna, an inverse split-ring resonator (ISRR), can convert microwave power into spin waves in a nanometer-thin permalloy film more efficiently than a standard microstrip transmission line. In full-wave numerical simulations, the authors report more than a fourfold improvement in microwave-to-spin-wave conversion efficiency at equal feed current, with the enhancement factor reaching above 4.45 at 6.62 GHz for a 40-nanometer film. The gain appears near an anti-crossing gap where the resonator's microwave photon mode hybridizes with width-quantized spin-wave modes, and it holds even though the photon-magnon coupling is weak. If the claim holds, magnonic circuits could excite short-wavelength spin waves locally with a compact antenna, without requiring cryogenic high-quality-factor resonators.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing element is the inverse split-ring resonator, specifically its anti-gap strip: a narrow metallic bridge (1 by 50 micrometers) that carries a resonant microwave current and concentrates the alternating magnetic field in the region where the permalloy film sits. At resonance, this confined near field hybridizes the microwave photon mode with width-quantized magnetostatic modes, producing anti-crossing frequency gaps from which the coupling strength is read with the two-coupled-oscillator formula. The efficiency comparison is made through the enhancement factor $\eta = \langle|h_z^{\mathrm{ISRR}}|\rangle / \langle|h_z^{\mathrm{MSTL}}|\rangle$, the ratio of spatially averaged out-of-plane AC field in the film for the two antennas at equal input current. The ferromagnetic response is modeled with the Polder susceptibility tensor in full-wave simulations, and the lowest four spin-wave band frequencies are verified independently in micromagnetic simulations.

What would settle it

Measure, in a fabricated ISRR-plus-permalloy device at 6.62 GHz and a bias field near 390 Oe, the amplitude of the excited spin wave by Brillouin light scattering or propagating spin-wave spectroscopy, comparing the ISRR with a microstrip line under the same accepted microwave power rather than the same port current. If the on-chip spin-wave signal is not several times larger for the ISRR, or if impedance correction reduces the ratio toward unity, the central claim would be falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

In its own terms, the paper's central claim is that the anti-gap strip of an inverse split-ring resonator acts as a resonant near-field antenna for spin waves: when a 50 by 12 by 0.04 micrometer permalloy film is placed over it, the out-of-plane alternating magnetic field inside the film is several times stronger than the field produced by a microstrip line of the same cross-section fed by the same 1 mA current. The transmission spectra show anti-crossings between the resonator mode and at least four width-quantized magnetostatic modes, with coupling strengths $g/(2\pi)$ of 175, 165, and 108 MHz and cooperativities between 0.826 and 0.143, placing the system in the weak-coupling regime. Along the spin-wave branches the spatially averaged field reaches above 700 Oe for the ISRR versus below 240 Oe for the microstrip, and the enhancement peaks at 6.62 GHz rather than at the 6 GHz resonator resonance. Increasing the film thickness to 100 nm raises the coupling strength to 267 MHz but reduces the enhancement to 2.8, which the paper interprets as evidence that weak coupling is preferable for efficient spin-wave excitation.

Load-bearing premise

The argument rests on identifying the ratio of spatially averaged AC magnetic field amplitudes in the permalloy film, at equal 1 mA feed current, with microwave-to-spin-wave conversion efficiency; if the field amplitude does not track the power actually delivered into spin waves, especially because the two antennas have different input impedances, the fourfold claim does not follow from the simulations.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • At frequencies and bias fields around the anti-crossing gap, an ISRR excites the fundamental and first width-quantized spin-wave modes in a 40-nanometer permalloy film with roughly four times the AC field amplitude of a microstrip line at the same feed current.
  • The enhancement is available in the weak-coupling regime, so the resonator does not need cryogenic superconducting materials or extremely narrow magnetic linewidths to be useful as a spin-wave launcher.
  • Increasing the ferromagnet volume strengthens photon-magnon coupling but lowers the enhancement, from above 4.45 for the 40-nanometer film to 2.8 for the 100-nanometer film, indicating an optimal coupling strength for transduction.
  • The active region is confined to subwavelength dimensions below 1 by 12 micrometers at 6 GHz while the feed line remains macroscopic, which supports integration into magnonic circuits.
  • The ISRR simultaneously excites pure magnetostatic waves and hybrid photon-magnon modes, unlike a conventional microstrip antenna that predominantly excites only the magnetostatic modes.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the reported factor compares AC field amplitudes at equal port current rather than spin-wave power delivered per unit of accepted microwave power, the practical efficiency gain should be rechecked with impedance-corrected or direct spin-wave power measurements; the two antennas present different input impedances.
  • If the unexplained shift of maximum enhancement from 6 GHz to 6.62 GHz reflects the non-reciprocal negative permeability discussed in the paper, then changing the bias-field direction or the film position over the anti-gap should move or suppress the peak, which is a testable prediction.
  • The same resonant near-field idea should transfer to other planar resonators and ferromagnetic metals; a systematic scan of resonator loss, film thickness, and lateral size could map where the weak-coupling enhancement is largest.
  • The paper's coupling parameters suggest that pushing the same design into the strong-coupling regime, for example by reducing resonator loss, could be counterproductive for transduction efficiency even if it is desirable for quantum information applications.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proposes an inverse split-ring resonator (ISRR) as a near-field antenna for exciting spin waves in a thin permalloy film, arguing that photon-magnon hybridization enhances the excitation compared with a conventional microstrip line. Full-wave CST simulations with a Polder-tensor material model show an anti-crossing in the |S21|(f, H0) map, from which the authors extract coupling strengths g/2π = 175 MHz for the fundamental mode, 165 MHz and 108 MHz for higher modes, and cooperativities below unity, i.e., weak coupling. The enhancement factor η, defined as the ratio of spatially averaged |hz| inside the Py film for the ISRR and MSTL at equal 1 mA port current, reaches a maximum above 4.45 at 6.62 GHz for the 40 nm film and 2.8 for the 100 nm film. These numbers are presented in the abstract and conclusions as 'more than fourfold improvement in conversion efficiency.'

Significance. The potential significance is substantial if the efficiency claim is substantiated: a compact resonant planar antenna with reported anti-crossing gaps around 350 MHz for a nanometer-thick metallic ferromagnet would be a useful building block for magnonic microwave circuits, and operation in the weak-coupling regime would relax material-loss constraints. Strengths of the manuscript include the explicit geometric and material parameters, the use of full-wave simulations, and the independent Mumax3 verification of the first four magnetostatic mode frequencies. However, the headline conclusion currently overstates the computed quantity: η is a local AC magnetic-field amplitude ratio under equal port current, not a measured or simulated conversion efficiency, and the paper does not account for the different input impedances and reflected powers of the two antennas.

major comments (2)
  1. [Excitation of SWs by ISRR and comparison with MTSL] The central quantitative claim rests on η = <|hz|>_ISRR / <|hz|>_MSTL, the ratio of spatial averages of the |hz| field in the Py film at equal port current. This ratio is a local-field enhancement factor, not a conversion efficiency. A conversion efficiency must compare the microwave power accepted by each antenna (or absorbed in the ferromagnet) with the resulting spin-wave power or amplitude; equal 1 mA port current does not equalize accepted power because the ISRR is a resonant load with a strong frequency-dependent reflection dip (Fig. 2(b)) while the MSTL is broadband. The abstract's 'more than fourfold improvement in conversion efficiency' and the Conclusions' 'approximately 4.2 times' therefore do not follow from the simulations as stated. Please either relabel the claim as near-field h-field enhancement, or include a power-based normalization (e.g., accepted power, reflected power, or integrated magnetization precession amplitude) to support the efficiency language.
  2. [Excitation of SWs by ISRR and comparison with MTSL] The statement that the hz component is 'a direct result of the SW dynamics in the Py film' conflates the microwave magnetic field inside the linear-response ferromagnet (CST/Polder-tensor solution) with the excited spin-wave amplitude. The reported enhancement may be dominated by the resonant field concentration of the empty ISRR rather than by an increased magnon population or spin-wave power. This is why a power-based or magnetization-based efficiency metric is needed; as it stands, the simulations demonstrate field concentration, not more efficient MW-to-SW conversion.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract and Conclusions] The abstract states 'more than a fourfold improvement', the Results section reports a maximum η above 4.45, and the Conclusions say 'approximately 4.2 times for the fundamental SW mode and 4.0 times for the width-quantized SW mode'; please reconcile these numbers or clarify which quantity each value refers to.
  2. [Throughout] The acronyms are used inconsistently: 'ISSR' appears in the section 'The photon-magnon coupling' and in figure text, and 'MTSL' is used interchangeably with 'MSTL' in several places; please standardize to the definitions given in the Methods.
  3. [Supporting Information S1] The MuMax3 package is spelled both 'MuMax3' and 'Mumax3' in different places; please choose one consistent spelling for the software and for the reference list entry.
  4. [The photon-magnon coupling] The sentence 'The full width at half maximum 2 κp/(2π) at the resonance is 1.28 GHz' uses an unusual notation; stating the half-linewidth κp/(2π) = 0.64 GHz directly would avoid ambiguity, especially since κp is later used in the cooperativity expression.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the enhancement factor is a direct numerical simulation output; the field-ratio metric is an interpretive assumption, not a circular derivation.

full rationale

The paper's claimed derivation chain is linear: the ISRR geometry is simulated with CST; the simulated |hz| fields inside the Py film are spatially averaged; the ratio eta = <|hz|>_ISRR / <|hz|>_MSTL is computed at equal 1 mA port current; and this ratio is reported as the enhancement. No parameter is fitted and then renamed as a prediction. The coupling strength g and magnon/photon linewidths are extracted from the same simulated anti-crossings, but they are used only to characterize the regime (weak coupling, C < 1); they are not inputs that force the eta values. The Mumax3 comparison uses the CST field as an excitation and verifies mode frequencies, which is a cross-check, not a circular input. No load-bearing self-citation or imported uniqueness theorem appears. The main critical concern with the paper -- that 'conversion efficiency' is operationalized as a local-field ratio at equal port current rather than delivered power or emitted spin-wave power -- is a validity/interpretation issue, not a circularity of the derivation. The paper also honestly states that the shift of the maximum enhancement from 6 GHz to 6.62 GHz is unexplained. Under the circularity definition used here, no step reduces by construction to its own input.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central numerical result rests on standard material parameters and a Polder-tensor linear-response model in CST, with the comparison metric defined by the authors. There are no invented physical entities. The main free choices are the resonance frequency, film geometry, and the feed-current normalization used to define the enhancement factor.

free parameters (3)
  • ISRR resonance frequency f_p = 6 GHz = 6 GHz
    Chosen by designing the ISRR geometry (Table 1). The central enhancement claim is evaluated near this photon mode, so the result depends on this design choice.
  • Py film dimensions 50 x 12 x 0.04 um = 50 x 12 x 0.04 um
    Chosen as the reference geometry for the main result; a separate 100 nm thickness is studied as a variation. The reported eta values are specific to this geometry.
  • Feed current 1 mA in both antennas = 1 mA
    Used to normalize the MSTL/ISRR comparison. Equal current does not imply equal accepted power for structures with different input impedances, which directly affects the claimed efficiency ratio.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Polder tensor with neglected exchange and demagnetizing-field inhomogeneity describes the Py response in CST.
    Invoked in the Computational methods section. Mode frequencies are checked against Mumax3 for the first four bands in the MSTL case, but the ISRR enhancement amplitudes are not independently verified.
  • standard math Two coupled harmonic oscillators describe the hybrid photon-magnon branches (Eq. 2).
    Used to extract coupling strengths and cooperativity from anti-crossing widths. This is standard in cavity magnonics but assumes Lorentzian modes and weak damping.
  • domain assumption Standard Py material parameters (4*pi*Ms = 10600 G, Delta H = 10 Oe, sigma = 2.4 MS/m) apply to the simulated film.
    Taken from literature. Coupling strengths, linewidths, and enhancement values all depend on these assumed parameters.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Influence of photon-magnon coupling to enhance spin-wave excitation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/MAC2YHL7

@misc{pith2026250609808,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Influence of photon-magnon coupling to enhance spin-wave excitation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/MAC2YHL7}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.09808}
}
abstract

One of the main challenges in magnonics is the efficiency of the conversion of microwave signals into spin waves. This efficiency is low due to the significant mismatch between microwave and spin wave wavelengths in the GHz range $10^{-2}$ m and $10^{-8}$ m, respectively, leading to high energy consumption in magnonic circuits. To address this issue, we propose an approach based on a planar inverse split-ring resonator (ISRR) loaded with a nanometer-thick Py film and exploiting the photon-magnon coupling effect. Our numerical studies show that the ISRR-based antenna achieves more than a fourfold improvement in conversion efficiency compared to a conventional single microstrip transmission line at frequencies and bias magnetic fields around the anti-crossing frequency gap. This has been demonstrated in the weak photon-magnon coupling regime for the nanometer-thin permalloy film with micrometer lateral dimensions. Further optimization of the ISRR can help to achieve the strong coupling regime, making the system potentially useful for quantum technology. Our compact and efficient antenna design offers a significant advantage over standard microstrip lines, paving the way for scalable and powerful magnonic circuits for microwave signal processing.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.09808 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Schematic view of an ISRR used in the study: (a) view from the feeding line side, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. (a) The MW magnetic field distribution around the anti-gap of the ISRR. Results [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. MW transmission coefficient |S21| versus frequency and static magnetic field for propagation through: (a) MSTL and (b) ISRR, both loaded with the same Py film. (c-j) Spatial distribution of the magnetic field component |hz| in the (y, z) cross section of the MSTL (c, d, g, h) and the ISRR anti-gap (e, f, i, j), crossing the Py film in the middle along the x axis. The frequencies and magnetic fields for which the |hz… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (6 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (a) Enhancement (η) of SW excitation by ISRR versus MSTL as a function of SW frequency - black dots. Green and blue points show the average AC magnetic field in the Py film for SWs excited by ISRR and MTLS, respectively. (b-e) AC |hz| field at the centre line (along th…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Transmission coefficient |S21| as a function of frequency and Py film thickness at fixed external magnetic field H0 = 365 Oe for (a) ISRR and (b) MSTL. The black dashed lines in (a) indicate the frequencies of the SW modes extracted from (b). CONCLUSIONS In this work, …
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Numerically calculated magnetostatic modes frequencies on external magnetic [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_1.png]
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: MW transmission coefficient |S21| versus frequency and static magnetic field for the ISRR (main graph), and spatial distribution of the AC magnetic field component |hz| in the (x, y) cross section in 50 × 12 × 0.04 µm Py film for the corresponding points on Fig. S2 mai…
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: |S21| spectra vs Py film width at H0 = 365 Oe for the ISRR SWs excitation (a); MSTL SW excitation (b). S4. Excitation of SWs by ISRR and comparison with MTSL for 100 nm film thickness [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p029_3.png]
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: |S21| spectra vs Py film width at H0 = 365 Oe for the ISRR SW excitation (a); MSTL SW excitation (b). 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p029_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Coupling phase interference effects in a multimode cavity magnonics system

    quant-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Coupling phases—not just strengths—determine which cavity modes couple to magnons and can produce nonreciprocal transmission at antiresonances in a multimode cavity magnonics system.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

53 extracted references · 52 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    1.1 Computing's energy problem (and what we can do about it)

    Horowitz, M. 1.1 Computing's energy problem (and what we can do about it). 2014 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference Digest of Technical Papers (ISSCC). 2014; pp 10--14

    work page 2014

  2. [2]

    E.; Young, I

    Manipatruni, S.; Nikonov, D. E.; Young, I. A. Beyond CMOS computing with spin and polarization. Nature Physics 2018, 14, 338--343

    work page 2018

  3. [3]

    V.; Demokritov, S

    Kruglyak, V. V.; Demokritov, S. O.; Grundler, D. Magnonics. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics 2010, 43, 260301

    work page 2010

  4. [4]

    Barman, A. et al. The 2021 Magnonics Roadmap . J. Phys. Condens. Matter 2021, 33, 413001

    work page 2021

  5. [5]

    Chumak, A. V. et al. Advances in Magnetics Roadmap on Spin-Wave Computing . IEEE Trans. Magn. 2022, 58, 1--72

    work page 2022

  6. [6]

    V.; Pirro, P

    Wang, Q.; Csaba, G.; Verba, R.; Chumak, A. V.; Pirro, P. Perspective on Nanoscaled Magnonic Networks. 2023

    work page 2023

  7. [7]

    Reservoir Computing with Spin Waves in a Skyrmion Crystal

    Lee, M.-K.; Mochizuki, M. Reservoir Computing with Spin Waves in a Skyrmion Crystal. Phys. Rev. Appl. 2022, 18, 014074

    work page 2022

  8. [8]

    V.; Hamdioui, S.; Adelmann, C.; Cotofana, S

    Mahmoud, A.; Ciubotaru, F.; Vanderveken, F.; Chumak, A. V.; Hamdioui, S.; Adelmann, C.; Cotofana, S. Introduction to spin wave computing . J. Appl. Phys. 2020, 128, 161101

    work page 2020

Show all 53 references
  1. [9]

    J.; Brandl, F.; Franke, K

    H\"am\"al\"ainen, S. J.; Brandl, F.; Franke, K. J. A.; Grundler, D.; van Dijken, S. Tunable Short-Wavelength Spin-Wave Emission and Confinement in Anisotropy-Modulated Multiferroic Heterostructures. Phys. Rev. Appl. 2017, 8, 014020

    2017

  2. [10]

    Towards magnonic devices based on voltage-controlled magnetic anisotropy

    Rana, B.; Otani, Y. Towards magnonic devices based on voltage-controlled magnetic anisotropy. Communications Physics 2019, 2, 90

    2019

  3. [11]

    Magnetization oscillations and waves driven by pure spin currents

    Demidov, V.; Urazhdin, S.; de Loubens , G.; Klein, O.; Cros, V.; Anane, A.; Demokritov, S. Magnetization oscillations and waves driven by pure spin currents. Physics Reports 2017, 673, 1--31, Magnetization oscillations and waves driven by pure spin currents

    2017

  4. [12]

    A.; Muralidhar, S.; Dvornik, M.; Åkerman, J

    Fulara, H.; Zahedinejad, M.; Khymyn, R.; Awad, A. A.; Muralidhar, S.; Dvornik, M.; Åkerman, J. Spin-orbit torque–driven propagating spin waves. Science Advances 2019, 5, eaax8467

    2019

  5. [13]

    E.; Krawczyk, M.; \' S migaj, W

    Gruszecki, P.; Kasprzak, M.; Serebryannikov, A. E.; Krawczyk, M.; \' S migaj, W. Microwave excitation of spin wave beams in thin ferromagnetic films. Scientific Reports 2016, 6, 22367

    2016

  6. [14]

    Magnetic vortex cores as tunable spin-wave emitters

    Wintz, S.; Tiberkevich, V.; Weigand, M.; Raabe, J.; Lindner, J.; Erbe, A.; Slavin, A.; Fassbender, J. Magnetic vortex cores as tunable spin-wave emitters. Nat Nanotechnol 2016, 11, 948--953

    2016

  7. [15]

    Approaching soft X-ray wavelengths in nanomagnet-based microwave technology

    Yu, H.; d' Allivy Kelly, O.; Cros, V.; Bernard, R.; Bortolotti, P.; Anane, A.; Brandl, F.; Heimbach, F.; Grundler, D. Approaching soft X-ray wavelengths in nanomagnet-based microwave technology. Nature Communications 2016, 7, 11255

    2016

  8. [16]

    B.; Ustinov, A

    Mori, K.; Goto, T.; Watanabe, T.; Koguchi, T.; Nakamura, Y.; Lim, P. B.; Ustinov, A. B.; Inoue, M. Broadband excitation of spin wave using microstrip line antennas for integrated magnonic devices. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics 2021, 55, 115002

    2021

  9. [17]

    F.; Kalinikos, B

    Dmitriev, V. F.; Kalinikos, B. A. Excitation of propagating magnetization waves by microstrip antennas. Soviet Physics Journal 1988, 31, 875--898

    1988

  10. [18]

    A.; Sekiguchi, K.; Granovsky, A

    Goto, T.; Yoshimoto, T.; Iwamoto, B.; Shimada, K.; Ross, C. A.; Sekiguchi, K.; Granovsky, A. B.; Nakamura, Y.; Uchida, H.; Inoue, M. Three port logic gate using forward volume spin wave interference in a thin yttrium iron garnet film. Scientific Reports 2019, 9, 16472

    2019

  11. [19]

    Time-Domain Measurement of Current-Induced Spin Wave Dynamics

    Sekiguchi, K.; Yamada, K.; Seo, S.-M.; Lee, K.-J.; Chiba, D.; Kobayashi, K.; Ono, T. Time-Domain Measurement of Current-Induced Spin Wave Dynamics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2012, 108, 017203

    2012

  12. [20]

    a ger, N.; F \

    Gro , F.; Tr \"a ger, N.; F \"o rster, J.; Weigand, M.; Sch \"u tz, G.; Gr \"a fe, J. Nanoscale detection of spin wave deflection angles in permalloy. Applied Physics Letters 2019, 114, Publisher Copyright: 2019 Author(s)

    2019

  13. [21]

    Lisiecki, F. et al. Magnons in a Quasicrystal: Propagation, Extinction, and Localization of Spin Waves in Fibonacci Structures. Phys. Rev. Appl. 2019, 11, 054061

    2019

  14. [22]

    Microstrip Excitation of Magnetostatic Surface Waves: Theory and Experiment

    Ganguly, A.; Webb, D. Microstrip Excitation of Magnetostatic Surface Waves: Theory and Experiment. IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques 1975, 23, 998--1006

    1975

  15. [23]

    Aquino, H. R. O.; Connelly, D.; Orlov, A.; Chisum, J.; Bernstein, G. H.; Porod, W. Design of a Coplanar-Waveguide-Based Microwave-to-Spin-Wave Transducer. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics 2022, 58, 1--5

    2022

  16. [24]

    Micromagnetic Simulation and Optimization of Spin-Wave Transducers

    Bruckner, F.; Davídková, K.; Abert, C.; Chumak, A.; Suess, D. Micromagnetic Simulation and Optimization of Spin-Wave Transducers. 2025; https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.16553

    2025 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Design rules for low-insertion-loss magnonic transducers

    Erd \'e lyi, R.; Csaba, G.; Maucha, L.; Kohl, F.; Heinz, B.; Greil, J.; Becherer, M.; Pirro, P.; Papp, \'A . Design rules for low-insertion-loss magnonic transducers. Scientific Reports 2025, 15, 9806

    2025

  18. [26]

    Visualization of spin dynamics in single nanosized magnetic elements

    Banholzer, A.; Narkowicz, R.; Hassel, C.; Meckenstock, R.; Stienen, S.; Posth, O.; Suter, D.; Farle, M.; Lindner, J. Visualization of spin dynamics in single nanosized magnetic elements. Nanotechnology 2011, 22, 295713

    2011

  19. [27]

    Pattern recognition in reciprocal space with a magnon-scattering reservoir

    Körber, L.; Heins, C.; Hula, T.; Kim, J.-V.; Thlang, S.; Schultheiss, H.; Fassbender, J.; Schultheiss, K. Pattern recognition in reciprocal space with a magnon-scattering reservoir. Nature Communications 2023, 14, 3954

    2023

  20. [28]

    C.; Yang, F

    Guo, S.; Russell, D.; Lanier, J.; Da, H.; Hammel, P. C.; Yang, F. Strong on-Chip Microwave Photon–Magnon Coupling Using Ultralow-Damping Epitaxial Y3Fe5O12 Films at 2 K. Nano Letters 2023, 23, 5055--5060

    2023

  21. [29]

    T.; Liu, L

    Hou, J. T.; Liu, L. Strong Coupling between Microwave Photons and Nanomagnet Magnons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2019, 123, 107702

    2019

  22. [30]

    Hybridizing Ferromagnetic Magnons and Microwave Photons in the Quantum Limit

    Tabuchi, Y.; Ishino, S.; Ishikawa, T.; Yamazaki, R.; Usami, K.; Nakamura, Y. Hybridizing Ferromagnetic Magnons and Microwave Photons in the Quantum Limit. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2014, 113, 083603

    2014

  23. [31]

    Zhang, X.; Zou, C.-L.; Jiang, L.; Tang, H. X. Strongly Coupled Magnons and Cavity Microwave Photons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2014, 113, 156401

    2014

  24. [32]

    Robust Magnon-Photon Coupling in a Planar-Geometry Hybrid of Inverted Split-Ring Resonator and YIG Film

    Bhoi, B.; Kim, B.; Kim, J.; Cho, Y.-J.; Kim, S.-K. Robust Magnon-Photon Coupling in a Planar-Geometry Hybrid of Inverted Split-Ring Resonator and YIG Film. Scientific Reports 2017, 7, 11930

    2017

  25. [33]

    T.; Wagle, D.; Rai, A.; Meyer, T.; Xiao, J

    Kaffash, M. T.; Wagle, D.; Rai, A.; Meyer, T.; Xiao, J. Q.; Jungfleisch, M. B. Direct probing of strong magnon–photon coupling in a planar geometry. Quantum Science and Technology 2022, 8, 01LT02

    2022

  26. [34]

    Magnetic-field controlled on-off switchable non-reciprocal negative refractive index in non-Hermitian photon-magnon hybrid systems

    Kim, J.; Kim, B.; Kim, B.; Jeon, H.; Kim, S.-K. Magnetic-field controlled on-off switchable non-reciprocal negative refractive index in non-Hermitian photon-magnon hybrid systems. Nature Communications 2024, 15, 9014

    2024

  27. [35]

    H.; Sun, D.; Li, Y.; Cahoon, J

    Xiong, Y.; Christy, A.; Dong, Y.; Comstock, A. H.; Sun, D.; Li, Y.; Cahoon, J. F.; Yang, B.; Zhang, W. Combinatorial split-ring and spiral metaresonator for efficient magnon-photon coupling. Phys. Rev. Appl. 2024, 21, 034034

    2024

  28. [36]

    C.; Baity, P

    Mac \^e do, R.; Holland, R. C.; Baity, P. G.; McLellan, L. J.; Livesey, K. L.; Stamps, R. L.; Weides, M. P.; Bozhko, D. A. Electromagnetic Approach to Cavity Spintronics. Phys. Rev. Appl. 2021, 15, 024065

    2021

  29. [37]

    Yadav, S.; Sharma, M.; Kuanr, B. K. Enhancement of Magnon–Photon Coupling Strength: Effect of Spatial Distribution. IEEE Magnetics Letters 2024, 15, 1--5

    2024

  30. [38]

    T.; Jungfleisch, M

    Wagle, D.; Rai, A.; Kaffash, M. T.; Jungfleisch, M. B. Controlling magnon-photon coupling in a planar geometry. Journal of Physics: Materials 2024, 7, 025005

    2024

  31. [39]

    O.; Davídková, K.; Mikkelsen, J.; Chumak, A

    Levchenko, K. O.; Davídková, K.; Mikkelsen, J.; Chumak, A. V. Review on spin-wave RF applications. 2024; https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.19212

    2024 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Strong to ultrastrong coherent coupling measurements in a YIG/cavity system at room temperature

    Bourcin, G.; Bourhill, J.; Vlaminck, V.; Castel, V. Strong to ultrastrong coherent coupling measurements in a YIG/cavity system at room temperature. Phys. Rev. B 2023, 107, 214423

    2023

  33. [41]

    Li, Y. et al. Strong Coupling between Magnons and Microwave Photons in On-Chip Ferromagnet-Superconductor Thin-Film Devices. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2019, 123, 107701

    2019

  34. [42]

    Mart \'i nez-Losa del Rinc \'o n, S.; Gimeno, I.; P\'erez-Bail \'o n, J.; Rollano, V.; Luis, F.; Zueco, D.; Mart \' nez-P \'e rez, M. J. Measuring the Magnon-Photon Coupling in Shaped Ferromagnets: Tuning of the Resonance Frequency. Phys. Rev. Appl. 2023, 19, 014002

    2023

  35. [43]

    Hybrid Magnonics for Short-Wavelength Spin Waves Facilitated by a Magnetic Heterostructure

    Inman, J.; Xiong, Y.; Bidthanapally, R.; Louis, S.; Tyberkevych, V.; Qu, H.; Sklenar, J.; Novosad, V.; Li, Y.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, W. Hybrid Magnonics for Short-Wavelength Spin Waves Facilitated by a Magnetic Heterostructure. Phys. Rev. Appl. 2022, 17, 044034

    2022

  36. [44]

    M.; Rippard, W

    Haygood, I.; Pufall, M.; Edwards, E.; Shaw, J. M.; Rippard, W. Strong Coupling of an Fe - Co Alloy with Ultralow Damping to Superconducting Co-planar Waveguide Resonators. Phys. Rev. Appl. 2021, 15, 054021

    2021

  37. [45]

    Zhao, Y.; Song, Q.; Yang, S.-H.; Su, T.; Yuan, W.; Parkin, S. S. P.; Shi, J.; Han, W. Experimental Investigation of Temperature-Dependent Gilbert Damping in Permalloy Thin Films. Scientific Reports 2016, 6, 22890

    2016

  38. [46]

    V.; Krawczyk, M.; Dobrovolskiy, O

    Vanatka, M.; Szulc, K.; Wojewoda, O.; Dubs, C.; Chumak, A. V.; Krawczyk, M.; Dobrovolskiy, O. V.; Klos, J. W.; Urb\'anek, M. Spin-Wave Dispersion Measurement by Variable-Gap Propagating Spin-Wave Spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. Appl. 2021, 16, 054033

    2021

  39. [47]

    Polder, D. VIII. On the theory of ferromagnetic resonance. Philosophical Magazine Series 1 1949, 40, 99--115

    1949

  40. [48]

    D.; Prabhakar, A

    Stancil, D. D.; Prabhakar, A. Spin Waves: Theory and Applications ; Springer, 2009

    2009

  41. [49]

    The design and verification of MuMax3

    Vansteenkiste, A.; Leliaert, J.; Dvornik, M.; Helsen, M.; Garcia-Sanchez, F.; Van Waeyenberge, B. The design and verification of MuMax3. AIP Advances 2014, 4, 107133

    2014

  42. [50]

    V.; Van Waeyenberge, B

    Leliaert, J.; Dvornik, M.; Mulkers, J.; De Clercq, J.; Milo s evi \' c , M. V.; Van Waeyenberge, B. Fast micromagnetic simulations on GPU—recent advances made with Mumax3 . Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics 2018, 51, 123002

    2018

  43. [51]

    A.; Usami, K.; Lachance-Quirion, D.; Nakamura, Y.; Hu, C.-M.; Tang, H

    Zare Rameshti , B.; Viola Kusminskiy , S.; Haigh, J. A.; Usami, K.; Lachance-Quirion, D.; Nakamura, Y.; Hu, C.-M.; Tang, H. X.; Bauer, G. E.; Blanter, Y. M. Cavity magnonics. Physics Reports 2022, 979, 1--61, Cavity Magnonics

    2022

  44. [52]

    In Recent Advances in Topological Ferroics and their Dynamics; Stamps, R

    Bhoi, B.; Kim, S.-K. In Recent Advances in Topological Ferroics and their Dynamics; Stamps, R. L., Schultheiß, H., Eds.; Solid State Physics; Academic Press, 2019; Vol. 70; pp 1--77

    2019

  45. [53]

    'Wmmm p ʤR)q--)!6ƌ!I 188X*T;T*up>#U. *^ s0m ma BB

    Guslienko, K. Y.; Chantrell, R. W.; Slavin, A. N. Dipolar localization of quantized spin-wave modes in thin rectangular magnetic elements. Phys. Rev. B 2003, 68, 024422 mcitethebibliography ACS_paper.tex0000664000000000000000000011675415022311016012102 0ustar rootroot [journal...

    2003

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.