Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 300 references

Coupling-phase interference — between cavity-magnon coupling phases and the 180°-delayed probe phases of far-detuned modes — explains the position-dependent uncoupled mode and the −80.7 dB nonreciprocal dips in a multimode cavity magnonics

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-01 10:23 UTC pith:PIJ2QXWT

load-bearing objection Serious cavity magnonics paper: the phase-interference mechanism behind the uncoupled mode and the −80.7 dB antiresonance isolation is plausible and internally consistent, but the external phases are inferred from parity, not measured, and the model-experiment ISO match stays qualitative. the 4 major comments →

arxiv 2607.20234 v1 pith:PIJ2QXWT submitted 2026-07-22 quant-ph cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Coupling phase interference effects in a multimode cavity magnonics system

M. Avicena , G. Bourcin , V. Vlaminck , J. Bourhill , V. Castel This is my paper
classification quant-ph cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords cavity magnonicscoupling phasenonreciprocal transmissionantiresonanceinput-output formalismYIG spheresre-entrant cavitymode interference
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper sets out to show that in a multimode cavity magnonics system, the phases of the couplings decide the transmission spectrum as much as their strengths do. In a four-post re-entrant microwave cavity loaded with two YIG spheres, each cavity-mode–magnon coupling carries an internal phase fixed by the microwave-field direction inside the sphere, and each probe couples to each mode with an external phase of 0 or π fixed by the field parity at the probe. Interference among the internal phases accumulates into a single physical phase θ_p: near θ_p = 0 (diagonal sphere arrangement) the coupling pathways cancel and leave one mode uncoupled, giving a three-peak chiral-like response; near θ_p = 3.09 rad (parallel arrangement) the degeneracy lifts into four peaks. The paper's second, stronger claim is that the large nonreciprocal transmission seen at the antiresonances — the narrow dips in transmission — up to −80.7 dB isolation, is not a property of the near-degenerate modes but of the far-detuned modes, whose π external probe phases interfere with internal phases to make the effective drive and readout of the magnons non-reciprocal. A 6×6 input–output model with phases taken from finite-element simulation reproduces all of these features, which is why the authors propose coupling-phase engineering as a design principle for multimode magnonic devices.

Core claim

The central claim: the spectrum of a multimode cavity-magnon system is set by two kinds of coupling phase. The internal phase θ_uv — the argument of the sphere's complex field overlap — enters each coupling as g_uv e^{iθ_uv}; the loop geometry accumulates these phases into one physical phase θ_p. At θ_p ≈ 0 (diagonal arrangement) the pathways cancel, leaving an uncoupled resonance; at θ_p ≈ 3.09 rad (parallel arrangement) four peaks appear. Second: the −80.7 dB nonreciprocity at antiresonance dips comes from far-detuned modes with odd-parity probe phase φ = π; adiabatic elimination makes the effective drive and readout non-adjoint (D_eff ≠ −B†_eff), biasing transmission by direction.

What carries the argument

The engine is the coupling phase. The internal phase θ_uv — the argument of the transverse microwave-field overlap at the sphere — enters each coupling as g_uv e^{iθ_uv}; the external phase φ_up ∈ {0, π} is set by the azimuthal field parity the probe senses. In a loop of four cavity modes and two magnons, unitary transformation cannot erase these phases; it accumulates them into one physical phase θ_p = θ_21 − θ_11 − (θ_20 − θ_10), which sets whether coupling pathways cancel or lift degeneracy. The far-detuned u = 0, 3 modes carry nonreciprocity: their φ = π probe phases survive adiabatic elimination and make the effective drive and readout non-adjoint (D_eff ≠ −B†_eff).

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that every external coupling phase is exactly 0 or π — with the two far-detuned modes supplying exactly π to one probe each — and that the internal phases extracted from finite-element simulation remain valid when the magnons are tuned onto resonance; if any phase takes an intermediate value or shifts in the coupled regime, the asymmetry behind the −80.7 dB isolation loses the form it needs.

What would settle it

Reposition one loop probe so the far-detuned modes' azimuthal field at the loop is no longer parity-definite (rotate the loop in azimuth or offset it from the symmetry plane) and measure S12 and S21 across the upper-polariton antiresonance at µ0H ≈ 0.178 T. If the −80.7 dB isolation dip persists at intermediate external phases, the odd-parity/π-phase mechanism is wrong; if the isolation shrinks as the phase deviates from π, the mechanism is confirmed. The model-side control already in the paper: switching φ of c0 and c3 from π to 0 (their Appendix G) removes the ISO branches.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Sphere position becomes a control knob: moving between the diagonal and parallel arrangements changes θ_p and switches the response between the three-peak (uncoupled-mode) and four-peak signatures — phase engineering by geometry alone.
  • Far-detuned modes cannot be dropped: with the c0 and c3 modes removed, the model's isolation branches vanish (paper Appendix G), so reciprocity at the antiresonances is recovered — making the far-detuned modes load-bearing for nonreciprocity.
  • The physical phase sets the apparent coupling strength: the reduced model gives g_eff² = 4g² at θ_p = 0 versus 2g² at θ_p = π, so the same cavity can show different avoided-crossing splittings depending on sphere placement.
  • Phase values become part of device characterization: feeding simulation-extracted internal and external phases into the 6×6 input-output model reproduces the measured spectra, so reporting coupling phases is needed for reliable multimode modeling.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Testable extension: shift one probe loop off the symmetry position so a far-detuned mode's sensed field parity becomes indefinite; the model then predicts the antiresonance isolation should shrink continuously as the external phase moves away from π — a direct experimental check of the mechanism.
  • The θ_p-dependent effective coupling (4g² vs 2g²) offers a way to extract the physical phase directly from measured avoided-crossing splittings, independent of the simulation-extracted internal phases — a cross-check the paper does not perform.
  • Because the mechanism needs only a loop of modes plus one odd-parity far-detuned partner, the same phase-interference recipe should transfer to other loop-coupled bosonic platforms (for example, coupled ring resonators), even without a magnetic material.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies a four-post re-entrant microwave cavity coupled to two YIG spheres in two geometric arrangements (diagonal and parallel). It extends the input-output formalism to explicitly include internal cavity–magnon coupling phases θ_uv and external cavity–probe coupling phases φ_up, and feeds parameters extracted from COMSOL eigenfrequency/frequency-domain simulations into a 6×6 scattering model. The model reproduces the main measured transmission features: a position-dependent uncoupled mode in the diagonal arrangement and four polariton resonances in the parallel arrangement. These are interpreted as interference effects controlled by the accumulated physical phase θ_p. The paper further reports large nonreciprocal transmission at antiresonance frequencies (ISO up to −80.7 dB) and attributes it to interference between the π-delayed external coupling phases of the far-detuned modes and the internal coupling phases. A reduced 4×4 model, a unitary-transformation argument, and an adiabatic elimination of the far-detuned modes are used to make the mechanism explicit.

Significance. If the mechanism is correct, the work is a useful advance: it shows that far-detuned cavity modes cannot be neglected in multimode cavity magnonics because their coupling phases generate interference signatures and nonreciprocity. The explicit 6×6 input-output model, the FE-extracted phase parameters, and the demonstration that full, effective, and analytic forms agree to about 4×10^-6 dB (Appendix F) are genuine strengths. The reduced analytic formulas for g_eff^2 (θ_p=0 and π) are derived, not assumed, and the paper gives a concrete, falsifiable prediction that the transmission signature is controlled by θ_p. The main caveats are that several parameters are calibrated or fitted (CF, γ_eff, d), and the decisive external phase assignments are inferred from mode parity rather than measured independently. The nonreciprocity prediction is only compared qualitatively with the experiment. These gaps limit, but do not eliminate, confidence in the central causal claim.

major comments (4)
  1. [§III A and Table I] The nonreciprocity mechanism relies on the assignment φ_up ∈ {0, π} for the far-detuned modes, with c0 and c3 each having one port at phase π. This assignment is inferred from the parity of the simulated azimuthal MW field at the probe, not extracted from a complex S-matrix fit or from a direct overlap calculation including the finite probe geometry. The paper provides no sensitivity analysis: if the physical probe phases deviate from 0/π, the effective drive/readout terms χ and ζ in Eq. (29) lose their required antisymmetry and the predicted isolation could change substantially. Please provide a quantitative sensitivity sweep over φ_up around the assumed values, and ideally validate the 0/π assignment by fitting the phase of the complex scattering parameters or by computing the complex probe-mode overlap.
  2. [§IV B and Fig. 7] The paper reports an experimental isolation peak of −80.7 dB, but the model's isolation is never compared quantitatively with this measured value. Figure 7 shows model ISO maps with and without far-detuned modes and a model line cut at 170 mT; there is no overlay with the experimental data, no statement of the model's maximum ISO, and no comparison of the frequency/field location of the model peak with the −80.7 dB measured point. Since the central claim is that the far-detuned external phases cause the observed nonreciprocity, the manuscript should report the model's ISO value at the experimental operating point and quantify agreement (or disagreement). The caption statement that the model with external coupling phase is 'shifted by +30 dB' is also ambiguous and should be clarified.
  3. [Appendix C, Eq. (C1); Appendix A] Three parameters are calibrated or fitted rather than predicted: CF is adjusted to reproduce the insertion loss, γ_eff=29.56 GHz/T is adjusted to match experiment, and the post-to-lid gap d is calibrated. This weakens the claim of an ab initio parameter-free comparison. Please state explicitly which observables are used for calibration and which are genuine predictions of the model. In particular, the role of CF in setting the absolute transmission level should be separated from the phase-interference signatures, which are the paper's central result.
  4. [§IV B, Eqs. (27)–(29)] The adiabatic-elimination argument assumes that the internal phases θ_uv extracted from FD simulations with the FMR far off resonance remain valid when the magnons are tuned to the cavity modes. This transferability is plausible but is not tested. A simple check would be to compare the complex transmission predicted by the full 6×6 model with a simulation or measurement at a field where the magnon is partially coupled, and to verify that the antiresonance line shape and isolation are stable under small perturbations of the θ_uv values extracted from the off-resonance FD run.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Appendix A] The text states that the saturation magnetization of YIG is 176 T; this should presumably be 176 mT (or 0.176 T). Please correct.
  2. [Fig. 7 caption] The phrase 'The model with external coupling phase included is shifted by +30 dB' is unclear. Is this an intentional vertical offset for visualization? Specify the offset and why it is applied.
  3. [Table I] Some extracted values are quoted with far more digits than physically meaningful (e.g., PA mode 3 θ_u0 = 0.785072237 rad). Please round to a precision consistent with the fitting/simulation uncertainty.
  4. [§IV A] The comparison between measured and simulated effective coupling strengths is reported as percentage offsets, but no uncertainty estimates are given for either quantity. Adding error bars or a typical run-to-run variation would make the 21.45% discrepancy for the DA more interpretable.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; the central phase-interference derivation is self-contained, though some amplitude/frequency agreement is calibrated rather than predicted.

full rationale

The central derivation chain is not circular. The reduced-model formulas, including g_eff^2 = 4g^2 for theta_p = 0 and g_eff^2 = 2g^2 for theta_p = pi, are derived from the 6x6 input-output matrix via a unitary transformation and the analytical S21 expression in Eq. (12), not assumed as inputs. The decisive values of the physical phase theta_p are taken from finite-element simulations (Table I) rather than fitted to the measured transmission peaks, and the paper explicitly reports that simulated coupling strengths underestimate the measured ones (offsets of 21.45%, 4.83%, and 11.28%), which is inconsistent with a claim that the agreement is forced by fitting those couplings. For the nonreciprocity result, the external phases phi_up are assigned from the parity of the simulated azimuthal field (Sec. III A, Table I) and then used in the input-output equations; the effective drive/readout asymmetry in Eq. (29) and the condition D_eff != -B†_eff are consequences of those equations, and Appendix G shows that removing the far-detuned modes removes the nonreciprocity. The experimental nonzero ISO is not used to infer the phi values, so the mechanism retains independent content. There are calibration steps that, if anything, weaken the comparison: CF is adjusted to reproduce the insertion loss (Eq. C1), gamma_eff is adjusted to match experiment (Appendix A), d is calibrated to match the empty-cavity frequencies, and the model ISO is not quantitatively compared to the experimental -80.7 dB peak. These are validation limitations, not circular reductions. Self-citations (refs. 12, 31, 32, 35) are used for background and conventions, but the load-bearing formulas are rederived in this paper, so they are not imported as unverified external authority. Overall, no specific step reduces a prediction to a fit or to a self-citation chain by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

The model's central inputs are FE-extracted phases and couplings. Three parameters (CF, gamma_eff, d) are fitted or calibrated to experiment. The effective terms introduced by adiabatic elimination (G, chi, zeta, crosstalk) are derived effective quantities, not new physical entities.

free parameters (3)
  • CF coupling factor = 10^6 Hz
    Adjusted to reproduce experimental insertion loss (Appendix C, Eq. C1); scales all external decay rates gamma_up and directly affects transmission levels and antiresonance depths.
  • gamma_eff = 29.56 GHz/T
    Adjusted to match experiment (Appendix A); sets magnon resonance frequency vs field, controlling where CMP branches and nonreciprocity appear.
  • post-to-lid gap d = 130.5 um
    Calibrated by matching simulated eigenfrequencies to the measured spectrum (Sec. II A); sets all cavity frequencies and hence the detunings used in the model.
axioms (5)
  • standard math Rotating-wave approximation and input-output formalism (Gardiner-Collett)
    Used to write H_int, H_ext, and Eq. (8); standard quantum optics assumptions invoked in Sec. III.
  • standard math First Markov approximation: kappa_up(omega) => kappa_up = sqrt(gamma_up) e^{i phi_up}, frequency-independent coupling to bath
    Sec. III A; needed for the simple S-matrix form.
  • domain assumption Only four cavity modes (c0-c3) and two magnon modes suffice; modes beyond 6.31 GHz start at 17.5 GHz and are negligible
    Sec. II A; the reduced mode set is central to the transmission model.
  • domain assumption External phase phi_up is restricted to 0 or pi by parity of the azimuthal MW magnetic field at the probe
    Sec. III A and Table I; required for the nonreciprocity mechanism.
  • domain assumption Internal coupling phases from FD simulations with FMR far off resonance remain valid in the coupled regime
    Appendix C; all theta_uv values fed into the model come from this extraction procedure.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 19226 in / 11553 out tokens · 91675 ms · 2026-08-01T10:23:10.281369+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Coupling phases play a decisive yet often overlooked role in cavity magnonics, particularly in complex multimode systems. Here, we investigate phase-mediated interference effects in a cavity magnonics system comprising a four-post re-entrant microwave cavity coupled to Yttrium Iron Garnet (YIG) spheres. Using an input-output model that explicitly accounts for both internal and external coupling phases, we achieve agreement with experimental microwave transmission measurements. Our results unravel the emergence of a positionally-dependent uncoupled mode due to interference of cavity photon-magnon (internal) coupling phases. Further, we experimentally observed large nonreciprocity at the antiresonance frequencies and show that this feature arises due to the far-detuned modes' odd parity cavity photon-probe (external) coupling phase interfering with the internal coupling phases. Bridging theory, simulation and experiment, these results establish coupling-phase engineering as a key principle for accurately modeling and designing multimode cavity magnonics devices.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.20234 by G. Bourcin, J. Bourhill, M. Avicena, V. Castel, V. Vlaminck.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. (a) An overhead view of the quadruple-post re-entrant cavity [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Eigenfrequency (EF) simulation of the MW magnetic field distribution inside the modeled empty cavity (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. (a-d) Scattering parameter [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Numerical calculation of Eq. (12) when the physical phase, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. (a) Overview of the nonreciprocity quantified by the isolation ratio, ISO. Three branches are apparent which corresponds to the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Comparison of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. ISO map of models (a) with the inclusion of far-detuned [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Schematics of the YIG position inside the cavity resonator, the configuration labels match the transmission and isolation response in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Transmission response of the cavity magnonics system for configurations shown in Figure 8. The responses inside the box are discussed [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Isolation response of the cavity magnonics system for configurations shown in Figure 8. The responses inside the box are discussed [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_10.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

300 extracted references · 180 canonical work pages · 23 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    and Hendrikx, Ruud and Koenderink, A

    Ruesink, Freek and Doeleman, Hugo M. and Hendrikx, Ruud and Koenderink, A. Femius and Verhagen, Ewold , month = nov, year =. Perturbing. Physical Review Letters , publisher =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.203904 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.115.203904

  2. [2]

    Interpreting

    Wang, Jiongjie and Xiao, Jiang , month = feb, year =. Interpreting. Optics Express , publisher =. doi:10.1364/OE.551120 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1364/oe.551120

  3. [3]

    and Ciani, Alessandro , month = jun, year =

    Danz, Sven and Berta, Mario and Schröder, Stefan and Kienast, Pascal and Wilhelm, Frank K. and Ciani, Alessandro , month = jun, year =. Calculating response functions of coupled oscillators using quantum phase estimation , volume =. Physical Review Research , publisher =. doi:10.1103/5c6d-r1fb , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1103/5c6d-r1fb

  4. [4]

    and Wächtler, Christopher W

    Moreno, Juan N. and Wächtler, Christopher W. and Eisfeld, Alexander , month = jan, year =. Synchronized states in a ring of dissipatively coupled harmonic oscillators , volume =. Physical Review E , publisher =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.109.014308 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.109.014308

  5. [5]

    Tserkovnyak, Yaroslav and Brataas, Arne and Bauer, Gerrit E. W. and Halperin, Bertrand I. , month = dec, year =. Nonlocal magnetization dynamics in ferromagnetic heterostructures , volume =. Reviews of Modern Physics , publisher =. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.77.1375 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.77.1375

  6. [6]

    Hybridizing

    Tabuchi, Yutaka and Ishino, Seiichiro and Ishikawa, Toyofumi and Yamazaki, Rekishu and Usami, Koji and Nakamura, Yasunobu , month = aug, year =. Hybridizing. Physical Review Letters , publisher =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.083603 , abstract =

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.113.083603

  7. [7]

    Zare Rameshti, Babak and Bauer, Gerrit E. W. , month = jan, year =. Indirect coupling of magnons by cavity photons , volume =. Physical Review B , publisher =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.97.014419 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.97.014419

  8. [8]

    Xu, Peng-Chao and Rao, J. W. and Gui, Y. S. and Jin, Xiaofeng and Hu, C.-M. , month = sep, year =. Cavity-mediated dissipative coupling of distant magnetic moments:. Physical Review B , publisher =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.100.094415 , abstract =

    doi:10.1103/physrevb.100.094415

  9. [9]

    Advanced Electronic Materials , author =

    Exceptional. Advanced Electronic Materials , author =. doi:10.1002/aelm.202500738 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1002/aelm.202500738

  10. [10]

    and Osada, A

    Hisatomi, R. and Osada, A. and Tabuchi, Y. and Ishikawa, T. and Noguchi, A. and Yamazaki, R. and Usami, K. and Nakamura, Y. , month = may, year =. Bidirectional conversion between microwave and light via ferromagnetic magnons , volume =. Physical Review B , publisher =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.93.174427 , abstract =

    doi:10.1103/physrevb.93.174427

  11. [11]

    Bai, Lihui and Harder, Michael and Hyde, Paul and Zhang, Zhaohui and Hu, Can-Ming and Chen, Y. P. and Xiao, John Q. , month = may, year =. Cavity. Physical Review Letters , publisher =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.217201 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.118.217201

  12. [12]

    Rao, J. W. and Wang, Y. P. and Yang, Y. and Yu, T. and Gui, Y. S. and Fan, X. L. and Xue, D. S. and Hu, C.-M. , month = feb, year =. Interactions between a magnon mode and a cavity photon mode mediated by traveling photons , volume =. Physical Review B , publisher =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.101.064404 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.101.064404

  13. [13]

    Zhang, Chi and Jia, Chenglong and Shi, Yongzhang and Jiang, Changjun and Xue, Desheng and Ong, C. K. and Chai, Guozhi , month = may, year =. Nonreciprocal multimode and indirect couplings in cavity magnonics , volume =. Physical Review B , publisher =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.103.184427 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.103.184427

  14. [14]

    and Krasnok, Alex and Shegai, Timur and Alù, Andrea and Chong, Yidong , month = oct, year =

    Baranov, Denis G. and Krasnok, Alex and Shegai, Timur and Alù, Andrea and Chong, Yidong , month = oct, year =. Coherent perfect absorbers: linear control of light with light , volume =. Nature Reviews Materials , publisher =. doi:10.1038/natrevmats.2017.64 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1038/natrevmats.2017.64 2017

  15. [15]

    Chong, Y. D. and Ge, Li and Cao, Hui and Stone, A. D. , month = jul, year =. Coherent. Physical Review Letters , publisher =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.053901 , abstract =

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.105.053901

  16. [16]

    and Stone, A

    Wang, Changqing and Sweeney, William R. and Stone, A. Douglas and Yang, Lan , month = sep, year =. Coherent perfect absorption at an exceptional point , volume =. Science , publisher =. doi:10.1126/science.abj1028 , abstract =

    doi:10.1126/science.abj1028

  17. [17]

    Dols, Martijn and Cherkasskii, Mikhail and Bittencourt, Victor A. S. V. and Gonzalez-Ballestero, Carlos and Dasari, Durga B. R. and Viola Kusminskiy, Silvia , month = jun, year =. Steady-state entanglement of spin qubits mediated by nonreciprocal and chiral magnons , volume =. Physical Review Research , publisher =. doi:10.1103/w358-y2z9 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1103/w358-y2z9

  18. [18]

    View article , url =

  19. [19]

    and Bittencourt, V.A.S.V

    Engelhardt, F. and Bittencourt, V.A.S.V. and Huebl, H. and Klein, O. and Kusminskiy, S. Viola , month = oct, year =. Optimal. Physical Review Applied , publisher =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevApplied.18.044059 , abstract =

    doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.18.044059

  20. [20]

    Remote nonreciprocal optical-microwave entanglement and one-way steering via parametric amplification , volume =

    Huang, Kai-Wei and Ren, Yi and Zhai, Hao and Xiong, Hao , month = jun, year =. Remote nonreciprocal optical-microwave entanglement and one-way steering via parametric amplification , volume =. Physical Review A , publisher =. doi:10.1103/syd1-f5q8 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1103/syd1-f5q8

  21. [21]

    AIP Advances , author =

    Controlling the dynamics of cavity magnon polariton via microwave polarization , volume =. AIP Advances , author =. 2022 , pages =. doi:10.1063/5.0102155 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0102155 2022

  22. [22]

    Dynamical phase-field model of cavity electromagnonic systems , volume =

    Zhuang, Shihao and Zhu, Yujie and Zhong, Changchun and Jiang, Liang and Zhang, Xufeng and Hu, Jia-Mian , month = aug, year =. Dynamical phase-field model of cavity electromagnonic systems , volume =. npj Computational Materials , publisher =. doi:10.1038/s41524-024-01380-w , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1038/s41524-024-01380-w

  23. [23]

    and Hovland, Peter K

    Lomsadze, Bachana and Weight, Skyler C. and Hovland, Peter K. D. , month = sep, year =. Effects of phase accumulation in frequency-comb-based multidimensional coherent spectroscopy , volume =. Physical Review A , publisher =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.106.033704 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.106.033704

  24. [24]

    , year =

    Jensen, E. , year =. Cavity basics , url =. doi:10.5170/CERN-2011-007.259 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.5170/cern-2011-007.259 2011

  25. [25]

    arXiv.org , author =

    Exchange-dominated origin of spin-wave nonreciprocity in planar magnetic multilayers , url =. arXiv.org , author =

  26. [26]

    Investigative Magnetic Resonance Imaging , author =

    A. Investigative Magnetic Resonance Imaging , author =. 2020 , pages =. doi:10.13104/imri.2020.24.3.95 , abstract =

    doi:10.13104/imri.2020.24.3.95 2020

  27. [27]

    Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics , author =

    Non-hermitian cavity magnonics for microwave applications:. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics , author =. doi:10.1088/1361-6463/ae74db , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6463/ae74db

  28. [28]

    Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter , author =

    Non-. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter , author =. doi:10.1088/1361-648X/ae7230 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-648x/ae7230

  29. [29]

    Zeitschrift für Physik B Condensed Matter , author =

    Parametric excitation of spherical modes in ferromagnetic spheres by perpendicular and parallel pumping , volume =. Zeitschrift für Physik B Condensed Matter , author =. 1991 , keywords =. doi:10.1007/BF01357194 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1007/bf01357194 1991

  30. [30]

    A spin-refrigerated cavity quantum electrodynamic sensor

    Wang, Hanfeng and Tiwari, Kunal L. and Jacobs, Kurt and Judy, Michael and Zhang, Xin and Englund, Dirk R. and Trusheim, Matthew E. , month = apr, year =. A spin-refrigerated cavity quantum electrodynamic sensor , url =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2404.10628 , abstract =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2404.10628

  31. [31]

    , month = jun, year =

    Tavis, Michael and Cummings, Frederick W. , month = jun, year =. Exact. Physical Review , publisher =. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.170.379 , abstract =

    doi:10.1103/physrev.170.379

  32. [32]

    2010 , pages =

    Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics , author =. 2010 , pages =. doi:10.1088/0022-3727/43/26/264002 , abstract =

    doi:10.1088/0022-3727/43/26/264002 2010

  33. [33]

    physica status solidi (b) , author =

    Properties of. physica status solidi (b) , author =. 1977 , note =. doi:10.1002/pssb.2220820102 , number =

    work page doi:10.1002/pssb.2220820102 1977

  34. [34]

    Review of Scientific Instruments , author =

    Efficient and robust analysis of complex scattering data under noise in microwave resonators , volume =. Review of Scientific Instruments , author =. 2015 , pages =. doi:10.1063/1.4907935 , abstract =

    doi:10.1063/1.4907935 2015

  35. [35]

    and Jiang, Liang and Zhang, Xufeng , month = jul, year =

    Pishehvar, Amin and Yan, Zixin and Wang, Zhaoyou and Jiang, Yu and Huang, Yizhong and Jornet, Josep M. and Jiang, Liang and Zhang, Xufeng , month = jul, year =. Resonance-enhanced. Physical Review Applied , publisher =. doi:10.1103/wc1j-mq69 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1103/wc1j-mq69

  36. [36]

    Yao, B. M. and Gui, Y. S. and Xiao, Y. and Guo, H. and Chen, X. S. and Lu, W. and Chien, C. L. and Hu, C.-M. , month = nov, year =. Theory and experiment on cavity magnon-polariton in the one-dimensional configuration , volume =. Physical Review B , publisher =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.92.184407 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.92.184407

  37. [37]

    , month = oct, year =

    Zhang, Xufeng and Zou, Chang-Ling and Jiang, Liang and Tang, Hong X. , month = oct, year =. Strongly. Physical Review Letters , publisher =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.156401 , abstract =

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.113.156401

  38. [38]

    Journal of Applied Physics , author =

    Measurement of. Journal of Applied Physics , author =. 1998 , note =. doi:10.1063/1.368498 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1063/1.368498 1998

  39. [39]

    Physical Review B , author =

    Cavity mediated level attraction and repulsion between magnons , volume =. Physical Review B , author =. 2022 , note =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.105.214418 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.105.214418 2022

  40. [40]

    Journal of Applied Physics , author =

    Higher order reentrant post modes in cylindrical cavities , volume =. Journal of Applied Physics , author =. 2017 , keywords =. doi:10.1063/1.4991751 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4991751 2017

  41. [41]

    Nature , author =

    Quantum. Nature , author =. 2017 , note =. doi:10.1038/nature23458 , abstract =

    doi:10.1038/nature23458 2017

  42. [42]

    and Humphreys, Peter C

    Heshami, Khabat and England, Duncan G. and Humphreys, Peter C. and Bustard, Philip J. and Acosta, Victor M. and Nunn, Joshua and Sussman, Benjamin J. , month = nov, year =. Quantum memories: emerging applications and recent advances , volume =. Journal of Modern Optics , publisher =. doi:10.1080/09500340.2016.1148212 , abstract =

    arXiv 2016

  43. [43]

    Applied Physics Letters , author =

    Gilbert damping of magnetostatic modes in a yttrium iron garnet sphere , volume =. Applied Physics Letters , author =. 2017 , note =. doi:10.1063/1.4977423 , abstract =

    doi:10.1063/1.4977423 2017

  44. [44]

    PRX Quantum , author =

    Triply efficient shadow tomography , volume =. PRX Quantum , author =. 2025 , note =. doi:10.1103/PRXQuantum.6.010336 , abstract =

    doi:10.1103/prxquantum.6.010336 2025

  45. [45]

    The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters , author =

    Graphical. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters , author =. 2014 , pages =. doi:10.1021/jz500997e , number =

    work page doi:10.1021/jz500997e 2014

  46. [46]

    Multifrequency Floquet Engineering of Magnon Polaritons

    Hackner, L. and Myatt, A. R. and Wustmann, W. and Lambert, N. J. , month = may, year =. Multifrequency. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2605.05576 , abstract =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.05576

  47. [47]

    Journal of Applied Physics , author =

    Creating tuneable microwave media from a two-dimensional lattice of re-entrant posts , volume =. Journal of Applied Physics , author =. 2015 , pages =. doi:10.1063/1.4936268 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4936268 2015

  48. [48]

    Goryachev, Maxim and Tobar, Michael E , month = jan, year =. The. New Journal of Physics , publisher =. doi:10.1088/1367-2630/17/2/023003 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1088/1367-2630/17/2/023003

  49. [49]

    , month = apr, year =

    Goryachev, Maxim and Jeong, Jaemo and Tobar, Michael E. , month = apr, year =. Experimental implementation of a large scale multipost re-entrant array , volume =. Applied Physics Express , publisher =. doi:10.7567/1882-0786/ab0dbf , abstract =

    work page doi:10.7567/1882-0786/ab0dbf

  50. [50]

    and Creedon, Daniel L

    Goryachev, Maxim and Farr, Warrick G. and Creedon, Daniel L. and Tobar, Michael E. , month = jan, year =. Controlling a whispering-gallery-doublet-mode avoided frequency crossing:. Physical Review A , publisher =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.89.013810 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.89.013810

  51. [51]

    The European Physical Journal Plus , author =

    Tunable-induced transparency and fast–slow light from atomic ensemble and a yttrium-iron-garnet sphere coupled to microwave cavities , volume =. The European Physical Journal Plus , author =. 2025 , pages =. doi:10.1140/epjp/s13360-025-06910-z , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1140/epjp/s13360-025-06910-z 2025

  52. [52]

    Review of Scientific Instruments , author =

    Rigorous analysis of highly tunable cylindrical transverse magnetic mode re-entrant cavities , volume =. Review of Scientific Instruments , author =. 2013 , keywords =. doi:10.1063/1.4848935 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4848935 2013

  53. [53]

    , month = dec, year =

    Fano, U. , month = dec, year =. Effects of. Physical Review , publisher =. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.124.1866 , abstract =

    doi:10.1103/physrev.124.1866

  54. [54]

    Dicke, R. H. , month = jan, year =. Coherence in. Physical Review , publisher =. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.93.99 , abstract =

    doi:10.1103/physrev.93.99

  55. [55]

    IEEE Transactions on Magnetics , author =

    Advances in. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics , author =. 2022 , keywords =. doi:10.1109/TMAG.2022.3149664 , abstract =

    arXiv 2022

  56. [56]

    Multi-mode input-output model for cavity magnonics: phase-resolved control of level repulsion, level attraction, and nonreciprocal transmission

    Bourcin, Guillaume and Avicena, Mufti and Vlaminck, Vincent and Bourhill, Jeremy and Castel, Vincent , month = apr, year =. Multi-mode input-output model for cavity magnonics: phase-resolved control of level repulsion, level attraction, and nonreciprocal transmission , shorttitle =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2603.05051 , abstract =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2603.05051

  57. [57]

    Zeitschrift für Physik , author =

    Zur. Zeitschrift für Physik , author =. 1930 , pages =. doi:10.1007/BF01339661 , abstract =

    doi:10.1007/bf01339661 1930

  58. [58]

    Universal Jaynes-Cummings Control of an Oscillator

    Huang, Jordan and Kasaba, Ethan and DiNapoli, Thomas J. and Roy, Tanay and Chakram, Srivatsan , month = may, year =. Universal. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2605.18658 , abstract =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.18658

  59. [59]

    Floquet-driven control of indirect magnon coupling in microwave cavities , volume =

    Heidarpour, Sajad and Abdolali, Ali and Rameshti, Babak Zare , month = jul, year =. Floquet-driven control of indirect magnon coupling in microwave cavities , volume =. Physical Review B , publisher =. doi:10.1103/jdtx-cgnl , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1103/jdtx-cgnl

  60. [60]

    A map of cavity magnonics: concepts, developments, and recent advances , volume =

    Macêdo, Rair and Smith, Mawgan A and Joseph, Alban and McKenzie, Ryan D and Stamps, Robert L , month = dec, year =. A map of cavity magnonics: concepts, developments, and recent advances , volume =. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter , publisher =. doi:10.1088/1361-648X/ae1ab9 , abstract =

    doi:10.1088/1361-648x/ae1ab9

  61. [61]

    Nonreciprocal single-photon scattering in giant-spin-ensemble--waveguide magnonics , volume =

    Wang, Xin and Qiu, Qing-Yang and Huang, Kai-Wei and Xiong, Hao , month = dec, year =. Nonreciprocal single-photon scattering in giant-spin-ensemble--waveguide magnonics , volume =. Physical Review A , publisher =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.108.063715 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.108.063715

  62. [62]

    Physics Reports , author =

    Non-. Physics Reports , author =. 2024 , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2024.01.006 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2024.01.006 2024

  63. [63]

    Quantum-dot based photonic quantum networks , volume =

    Lodahl, Peter , month = oct, year =. Quantum-dot based photonic quantum networks , volume =. Quantum Science and Technology , publisher =. doi:10.1088/2058-9565/aa91bb , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1088/2058-9565/aa91bb 2058

  64. [64]

    Downing, C. A. and Sturges, T. J. and Weick, G. and Stobińska, M. and Martín-Moreno, L. , month = nov, year =. Topological. Physical Review Letters , publisher =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.217401 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.123.217401

  65. [65]

    Song, Wan-Lu and Liu, Hai-Bin and Zhou, Bin and Yang, Wan-Li and An, Jun-Hong , month = feb, year =. Remote. Physical Review Letters , publisher =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.090401 , abstract =

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.132.090401

  66. [66]

    , year =

    Mahan, Gerald D. , year =. Many-. doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-5714-9 , urldate =

    doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-5714-9

  67. [67]

    Yao, Bimu and Yu, Tao and Gui, Y. S. and Rao, J. W. and Zhao, Y. T. and Lu, W. and Hu, C.-M. , month = dec, year =. Coherent control of magnon radiative damping with local photon states , volume =. Communications Physics , publisher =. doi:10.1038/s42005-019-0264-z , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1038/s42005-019-0264-z

  68. [68]

    and Benenti, Giuliano and Sassetti, Maura , month = feb, year =

    Ferraro, Dario and Cavaliere, Fabio and Genoni, Marco G. and Benenti, Giuliano and Sassetti, Maura , month = feb, year =. Opportunities and challenges of quantum batteries , volume =. Nature Reviews Physics , publisher =. doi:10.1038/s42254-025-00906-5 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1038/s42254-025-00906-5

  69. [69]

    Tirone, Salvatore and Salvia, Raffaele and Giovannetti, Vittorio , month = nov, year =. Quantum. Physical Review Letters , publisher =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.210601 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.127.210601

  70. [70]

    Quantifying coherence of

    Xu, Jianwei , month = mar, year =. Quantifying coherence of. Physical Review A , publisher =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.93.032111 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.93.032111

  71. [71]

    Dissipative

    Barra, Felipe , month = may, year =. Dissipative. Physical Review Letters , publisher =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.210601 , abstract =

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.122.210601

  72. [72]

    Entanglement boost for extractable work from ensembles of quantum batteries , volume =

    Alicki, Robert and Fannes, Mark , month = apr, year =. Entanglement boost for extractable work from ensembles of quantum batteries , volume =. Physical Review E , publisher =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.87.042123 , abstract =

    doi:10.1103/physreve.87.042123

  73. [73]

    and Polini, Marco and Andolina, Gian Marcello , month = jul, year =

    Campaioli, Francesco and Gherardini, Stefano and Quach, James Q. and Polini, Marco and Andolina, Gian Marcello , month = jul, year =. Colloquium:. Reviews of Modern Physics , publisher =. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.96.031001 , abstract =

    doi:10.1103/revmodphys.96.031001

  74. [74]

    and Bauer, Gerrit E

    Yu, Tao and Zhang, Xiang and Sharma, Sanchar and Blanter, Yaroslav M. and Bauer, Gerrit E. W. , month = mar, year =. Chiral coupling of magnons in waveguides , volume =. Physical Review B , publisher =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.101.094414 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.101.094414

  75. [75]

    and Bauer, Gerrit E

    Yu, Tao and Zhang, Yu-Xiang and Sharma, Sanchar and Zhang, Xiang and Blanter, Yaroslav M. and Bauer, Gerrit E. W. , month = mar, year =. Magnon. Physical Review Letters , publisher =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.107202 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.124.107202

  76. [76]

    arXiv.org , author =

    Magnonic. arXiv.org , author =

  77. [77]

    arXiv.org , author =

    Quantum. arXiv.org , author =

  78. [78]

    arXiv.org , author =

    Observation of attractor transitions in active magnon-polaritons under microwatt drives , url =. arXiv.org , author =

  79. [79]

    Tarabunga, Poetri Sonya and Tirrito, Emanuele and Chanda, Titas and Dalmonte, Marcello , month = oct, year =. Many-. PRX Quantum , publisher =. doi:10.1103/PRXQuantum.4.040317 , abstract =

    doi:10.1103/prxquantum.4.040317

  80. [80]

    , month = jun, year =

    Wang, Yang and Kumar, Aishwarya and Wu, Tsung-Yao and Weiss, David S. , month = jun, year =. Single-qubit gates based on targeted phase shifts in a. Science , publisher =. doi:10.1126/science.aaf2581 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1126/science.aaf2581

Showing first 80 references.