Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

In-Plane Ni-O-Ni Bond Angles as Structural Fingerprints of Superconductivity in Layered Nickelates: Effects of Pressure, Strain, Layering, and Correlations

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read In-plane Ni-O-Ni bond angles correlate with the superconducting dome in layered nickelates and can serve as a structural proxy for Tc.

desk verdict The central bond-angle/Tc proxy is likely a relaxation artifact: the claimed I4/mmm phase cannot have an in-plane Ni-O-Ni angle of 177°, so the computed dome is internally inconsistent. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.11427 v1 pith:V4YKBFVV submitted 2025-06-13 cond-mat.supr-con cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Bipasa Samanta , Alexandru B. Georgescu This is my paper
classification cond-mat.supr-concond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords layerednickelatesLa3Ni2O7Ni-O-Nibondanglehigh-pressuresuperconductivityDFT+Uepitaxialstrainstructuralphasetransitionelectroncorrelations
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that a single structural quantity, the in-plane Ni-O-Ni bond angle in layered nickelate superconductors, tracks the pressure-dependent superconducting transition temperature Tc closely enough to act as a proxy. Using DFT+U calculations, the authors find that this bond angle first straightens with pressure, peaks near the experimentally observed Tc maximum, and then bends again, forming a structural dome that mirrors the superconducting dome. The same angle also straightens under compressive epitaxial strain, peaking near the 2% strain where superconductivity has been reported in thin films, but remains more bent than at optimal pressure, consistent with a lower Tc. The paper also shows that more NiO2 layers and heavier rare-earth substitutions shift the pressure needed for bond straightening upward, and that stronger electron correlations delay the structural transition. If this connection holds, computed bond angles become a cheap screening tool for where and how to engineer superconductivity in nickelates.

What carries the argument

The central object is the in-plane Ni-O-Ni bond angle, the angle formed by a Ni-O-Ni linkage within a NiO2 plane. The argument is carried by the way this angle responds to pressure, strain, layering, and Hubbard U: it straightens as octahedral tilting is suppressed, peaks at the structural transition, and bends again at higher pressure, forming a dome that correlates with the measured Tc dome. The associated phase transition from orthorhombic Amam to tetragonal I4/mmm, where the out-of-plane angle locks to 180 degrees, marks the optimal in-plane geometry, and the evolution of this in-plane angle is what the authors propose as a proxy for superconductivity.

What would settle it

High-pressure X-ray or neutron diffraction that resolves the in-plane Ni-O-Ni bond angle in La3Ni2O7 across the full superconducting pressure window: if the angle does not peak and then decline at the same pressures as Tc, the bond-angle fingerprint is falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the in-plane Ni-O-Ni bond angle in La3Ni2O7 and related layered nickelates is a structural fingerprint of superconductivity: under hydrostatic pressure the angle increases from about 169 degrees at ambient conditions to a maximum of about 177 degrees near the structural transition from orthorhombic Amam to tetragonal I4/mmm at roughly 15 GPa, then decreases at higher pressures, producing a dome that matches the experimentally observed Tc dome with its maximum near 83 K. Under compressive biaxial strain the angle straightens to a maximum near 2% strain, the strain at which ambient-pressure superconductivity has been reported in thin films, and the maximum angle is more bent than under optimal pressure, consistent with a lower Tc. The authors extend the same analysis to the monolayer-trilayer (1-3) polymorph of La3Ni2O7, trilayer La4Ni3O10, and Pr-substituted Pr3Ni2O7, finding that extra layers and heavier rare earths raise the pressure required to reach the optimal straight-bond configuration. They further find that increasing the Hubbard U delays the structural transition and stabilizes high-spin states, so moderate correlation strength appears optimal for superconductivity, while stronger correlation prevents the bond geometry associated with superconductivity from forming.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the ferromagnetic state is a faithful stand-in for the actual magnetic state of the material in the pressure range of interest; if the real material is antiferromagnetic there, the computed bond-angle dome shifts by 5-10 GPa and the correlation with Tc would be anchored to the wrong magnetic reference.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The in-plane Ni-O-Ni bond angle can be used as a computational screening criterion: a candidate nickelate whose calculated bond-angle dome peaks near the experimentally known Tc maximum is a promising superconductor, without needing to compute pairing itself.
  • Epitaxial compressive strain of about 2% on a suitable substrate should reproduce a favorable bond geometry at ambient pressure, though with a lower Tc than the pressure-optimized bulk compound.
  • Syntheses targeting higher Tc should avoid heavier A-site rare earths and thicker perovskite stacks unless higher pressure is applied, since both raise the pressure at which bond straightening occurs.
  • Correlation strength is a tuning knob: materials with very strong on-site Coulomb interactions resist the structural transition, so optimal superconductivity may require a moderate U regime rather than the largest possible correlation.
  • The pressure window for superconductivity is set by the structural phase transition: the maximum in-plane bond angle coincides with the orthorhombic-to-tetragonal transition, so structural measurements at pressure can bracket the superconducting dome.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the bond-angle proxy holds, it could be used to map candidate phases before synthesis: computing the pressure and strain dependence of the in-plane angle for new nickelate families would give a first-pass estimate of the thermodynamic conditions required for superconductivity, a protocol the paper does not itself claim to establish.
  • The bond-angle dome may be a common structural signature linking nickelate and cuprate superconductivity, since cuprates also exhibit a doping-driven structural transition near the superconducting dome; the paper does not develop this cross-family comparison.
  • The ferromagnetic-proxy assumption points to a concrete experiment: determining the true magnetic ground state of La3Ni2O7 under pressure would validate or invalidate the structural fingerprint, because the dome shifts by 5-10 GPa in antiferromagnetic calculations.
  • The strain result implies a testable prediction: growing La3Ni2O7 films on substrates delivering 2-3% compressive strain and measuring both the in-plane bond angle and Tc should show a systematic correlation across different substrates, a test the paper does not report.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript uses DFT+U to study the structural evolution of bilayer La3Ni2O7 and related nickelates under hydrostatic pressure and epitaxial strain. It reports that the in-plane Ni-O-Ni bond angle exhibits a dome-shaped pressure dependence that the authors compare visually with the experimentally measured Tc dome, and they propose this angle as a structural proxy for superconductivity. The paper also examines the effects of Hubbard U, magnetic ordering, layer count, and Pr substitution, and predicts that approximately 2% compressive strain produces bond straightening consistent with recent thin-film experiments.

Significance. If the proposed correlation is quantitatively robust and free of structural artifacts, the in-plane Ni-O-Ni angle would be a cheap, useful descriptor for optimizing pressure, strain, and chemistry in layered nickelates. The computational campaign is systematic, covering multiple pressures, U values from 0 to 5 eV, three antiferromagnetic configurations, two La3Ni2O7 polymorphs, trilayer La4Ni3O10, and Pr3Ni2O7; the U=0 and U=2 calculations reproduce the experimentally reported ~15 GPa transition pressure of bilayer La3Ni2O7. However, the central correlation is currently qualitative, is calibrated on the same experimental data it claims to predict, and rests on a structural assignment that is internally inconsistent with the reported in-plane bond-angle dome. These issues must be resolved before the proxy can be considered established.

major comments (4)
  1. [Structural Analysis; Fig. 3(b)] The central structural result is internally inconsistent: Fig. 3(b) reports a dome in the in-plane Ni-O-Ni angle with a maximum of about 177 degrees near the pressure where the structure is assigned to I4/mmm, yet in I4/mmm the in-plane oxygen sits at the midpoint between Ni atoms and this angle is pinned at exactly 180 degrees by symmetry. A 177 degree value implies residual in-plane octahedral rotation and a lower-symmetry space group (e.g., P4/mbm), not I4/mmm. The authors should identify the actual space group of the relaxed structures with a symmetry finder, tighten the force/energy thresholds and k-mesh, and either show that the in-plane angle is 180 degrees in the high-pressure phase or revise the space-group assignment. With the present data, the dome-shaped angle-pressure curve and the Tc correlation may be numerical artifacts.
  2. [Fig. 1; Structural Analysis] The claim of a strong correlation with the experimental Tc dome is supported only by an overlay of computed angles and digitized experimental Tc values. No quantitative correlation coefficient, error bars, or sensitivity analysis are reported, and the same experimental dataset (Ref. 7) is used both to identify the correlation and to validate it, so the agreement is circular as a test of predictive power. The authors should quantify the correlation (e.g., Pearson or Spearman with uncertainties from digitization and structural relaxation) and test the proxy on conditions not used for calibration, such as the strained thin-film data of Ref. 42 or the Pr/trilayer compounds if Tc data become available.
  3. [Antiferromagnetic Ordering Effect; Figs. 6(c)-6(f)] The use of the ferromagnetic state as a proxy for the paramagnetic state is load-bearing for the reported 15 GPa transition and the associated bond-angle dome. At U=2 eV, AFM-A and AFM-G shift the transition to about 20 GPa and AFM-C to about 25 GPa, while at U=0 eV AFM-C and AFM-G also require higher pressures than FM. The paper gives no evidence that La3Ni2O7 is ferromagnetic in the pressure range of interest, and Ref. 43 concerns NdNiO3 rather than this nickelate. The authors should either justify the FM approximation for this material with a dedicated paramagnetic or noncollinear calculation, or show that the dome structure, after rescaling pressure, is robust across magnetic configurations.
  4. [Compressive Strain Effect; Fig. 9] The prediction of a significantly lower Tc in strained films is an inference from the lower peak bond angle at about 2% strain compared with the hydrostatic-pressure peak. No quantitative mapping from bond angle to Tc is established, because the correlation is qualitative even under pressure, and the strain calculations include no uncertainty estimates or comparison with a second experimental strain value. Either provide a quantitative angle-Tc relationship or soften the claim to a qualitative trend.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Table 1 and accompanying text] The text says the dz2 eigenvalue decreases from 1.35 to 1.44 and dx2-y2 from 1.34 to 1.45, but both numbers increase; clarify the intended statement (e.g., 'increase in occupation' rather than 'decrease').
  2. [Figure captions] The Fig. 3 caption refers to 'Figure 1d' but should refer to 'Figure 2d', and the Fig. 8 caption contains a typo ('representts') and an incomplete parenthetical.
  3. [Computational Methods] 'cell dofreeparameter' should be 'cell_dofree parameter'; please also state whether the strain calculations include any residual hydrostatic pressure component and provide pseudopotential identifiers or input-file availability for reproducibility.
  4. [Magnetic-configuration nomenclature] The notation for antiferromagnetic configurations is inconsistent: AFM-A, AFM-C, and AFM-G appear in the text and Fig. 5 caption, while A-AFM, C-AFM, and G-AFM appear elsewhere; please unify.
  5. [Fig. 1] The experimental Tc dataset should specify the pressure range and whether Tc values are onsets, midpoints, or zero-resistance values, and the figure should be cited in the main text at the point of comparison.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the computed bond-angle dome is derived from DFT+U relaxations without Tc input, and the correlation with the experimental Tc dome is a post-hoc comparison rather than a fitted prediction.

full rationale

The central quantity, the in-plane Ni-O-Ni bond angle as a function of pressure and strain, is obtained from DFT+U variable-cell relaxations starting from a Materials Project structure. The energy functional, relaxation procedure, and structural outputs contain no experimental Tc data; the experimental Tc dome is introduced only afterward for comparison. The dome shape of the in-plane angle is reported at all U values and for several magnetic orderings, so it is not a one-parameter fit to the Tc dome. The choice of U=2 eV is justified by agreement with the experimental transition pressure and magnetic-moment collapse, but the angle-vs-pressure dome is not constructed from that agreement. The strain and layer-count statements are applications of the computed structural trends, not circular redefinitions: 'optimal' strain is defined by the computed angle maximum and then compared with an independent experimental report. The FM state as a proxy for the paramagnetic state is an approximation supported by an external citation (Ref 43), and the paper explicitly quantifies how AFM order shifts the transition pressure; this is a stated limitation, not a circular step. No load-bearing self-citations, imported uniqueness theorems, or ansatz-smuggling citations from the authors' prior work are present. The skeptical concern about the in-plane angle reaching only 177° in a claimed I4/mmm structure is a physical-consistency question about the relaxation results, not an instance of the derivation reducing to its own inputs. Accordingly, no circular step meeting the quotation-and-reduction standard can be identified, and the score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard DFT+U assumptions plus the ad hoc identification of the bond angle as a Tc proxy. One free parameter (U) is tuned to match experimental pressure data. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • Hubbard U = 2 eV (tested 0-5 eV)
    U=2 eV selected because it reproduces the experimental transition pressure and the high-spin to low-spin transition; other U values shift the structural transition by up to 35 GPa.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption DFT+U with ultrasoft pseudopotentials and a 40 Ry cutoff is sufficiently accurate for the structural properties of layered nickelates.
    Invoked throughout; no convergence tests with respect to k-mesh, pseudopotential choice, or higher-level methods are presented.
  • domain assumption The ferromagnetic state is used as a proxy for the paramagnetic state.
    Stated in the introduction with reference 43 as justification; however AFM states shift transition pressures by 5-10 GPa.
  • domain assumption The experimental Tc dome from reference 7 is an accurate benchmark for superconductivity in La3Ni2O7.
    Used to define the correlation in Figure 1; reference 7 is a preprint and the Tc values depend on sample conditions.
  • ad hoc to paper The in-plane Ni-O-Ni bond angle is directly associated with superconductivity and can be used as a proxy.
    This is the central hypothesis of the paper, not independently derived; it is supported only by the observed correlation.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of In-Plane Ni-O-Ni Bond Angles as Structural Fingerprints of Superconductivity in Layered Nickelates: Effects of Pressure, Strain, Layering, and Correlations." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/V4YKBFVV

@misc{pith2026250611427,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: In-Plane Ni-O-Ni Bond Angles as Structural Fingerprints of Superconductivity in Layered Nickelates: Effects of Pressure, Strain, Layering, and Correlations},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/V4YKBFVV}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.11427}
}
abstract

We investigate the structural and electronic conditions conducive to superconductivity in layered nickelates using density functional theory with Hubbard corrections (DFT+$U$). For both the bilayer and 1-3 polymorphs of La$_3$Ni$_2$O$_7$, we find that the in-plane Ni-O-Ni bond angles under pressure strongly correlate with the experimentally observed superconducting transition temperature ($T_c$) dome, and may serve as a reasonable proxy. Under compressive strain, the bond angles straighten, peaking near 2\% strain-consistent with experimental reports of superconductivity in strained bilayer thin films. However, the bond angles at this strain are more bent than those achieved under hydrostatic pressure, correlating with a lower $T_c$. We show that increasing the number of NiO$_2$ layers, as in La$_4$Ni$_3$O$_{10}$, or substituting heavier rare-earth elements (e.g., Pr) raises the pressure required to reach the structural configuration associated with superconductivity. Our results indicate that these systems require higher external pressure to achieve in-plane bond straightening. Varying the on-site Coulomb interaction $U$ reveals that stronger electronic correlations delay the structural transition and favor high-spin states. This suggests that moderate correlation strength may be optimal for superconductivity, with stronger correlation preventing the formation of favorable bond geometries. Electronic structure analysis shows that the Ni $e_g$ orbitals dominate near the Fermi level and shift downward with pressure, enhancing Ni-O hybridization. These results highlight how pressure and strain tune structural features that may be essential for engineering high-$T_c$ phases in nickelate superconductors.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.11427 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Strong correspondence between the theoretically obtained in-plane Ni-O-Ni bond [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. (a) Front view of the unit cell of bulk bilayer La [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. (a) and (b) show how increasing pressure affects the a, b, and c lattice constants [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (10 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Change in the La3Ni2O7 structure in terms of (a) a and b lattice constant (b) out-of-plane Ni-O-Ni bond angle (c) in-plane Ni-O-Ni bond angle and (d) magnetic moment as the effect of increasing U and pressure. The legends for figure (b) hold for (c) and (d) as well. An…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Magnetic configurations explored. Up and down spin are represented by blue and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: (a) and (b) show the energy difference of the optimized AFM structures of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Structure of (a)bilayer La3N i2O7 (b) mono-layer tri-layer La3N i2O7 (c) tri-layer La4N i3O10 and (d) bilayer P r3N i2O7 Figures 8(a–h) summarize the evolution of key structural parameters as a function of pressure and U. For the monolayer–trilayer La3Ni2O7 , the out-o…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: (a), (b), (representts the effect on out-of-plane Ni-O-Ni bond angle on increasing [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: In plane bond angles for La3Ni2O7 versus compressive strain at different U [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FM La3Ni2O7 PDOS plots. (a) and (b) show the PDOS at 0 and 15 Gpa for La(5d), Ni(3d), and O(2p). (c) and (d) Shows the Ni d-orbital PDOS at 0 and 15 GPa. Under 15 GPa pressure, the Ni (3d) states shift closer to the Fermi level (Figure 10b), and both dz 2 and dx2−y 2 …
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FM La3Ni2O7 PDOS plots comparison at 0 and 15 GPa. (a) dz 2 (b) dx2−y 2 (c) t2g [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FM La3Ni2O7 PDOS plots. (a) Shows the d-orbital PDOS at 0 Gpa. (b) Shows the d-orbital PDOS at transition pressure. (c) dz2 orbital at 0 and transition pressure. (d) dx2 -y2 orbital at 0 and transition pressure. The influence of electron correlation is further evident…
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: (a) and (c) represent spin polarization while (b) and (d) represent an example [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_13.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Superexchanges and Charge Transfer in the La$_3$Ni$_2$O$_7$ Thin Films

    cond-mat.supr-con 2025-11 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    In La3Ni2O7 thin films, the interlayer d3z2-r2 antiferromagnetic coupling is about 27% weaker than in bulk, in-plane coupling is nearly unchanged, and hole/electron doping is particle-hole asymmetric.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

49 extracted references · 44 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Y.; Osada, M.; Crossley, S.; Lee, H

    Li, D.; Lee, K.; Wang, B. Y.; Osada, M.; Crossley, S.; Lee, H. R.; Cui, Y.; Hikita, Y.; Hwang, H. Y. Superconductivity in an infinite-layer nickelate. Nature 2019, 572, 624--627

    work page 2019

  2. [2]

    Y.; Goodge, B

    Osada, M.; Wang, B. Y.; Goodge, B. H.; Lee, K.; Yoon, H.; Sakuma, K.; Li, D.; Miura, M.; Kourkoutis, L. F.; Hwang, H. Y. A superconducting praseodymium nickelate with infinite layer structure. Nano letters 2020, 20, 5735--5740

    work page 2020

  3. [3]

    Y.; Goodge, B

    Osada, M.; Wang, B. Y.; Goodge, B. H.; Harvey, S. P.; Lee, K.; Li, D.; Kourkoutis, L. F.; Hwang, H. Y. Nickelate superconductivity without rare-earth magnetism:(La, Sr) NiO2. Advanced Materials 2021, 33, 2104083

    work page 2021

  4. [4]

    E.; Cao, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Tang, C

    Zeng, S.; Li, C.; Chow, L. E.; Cao, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Tang, C. S.; Yin, X.; Lim, Z. S.; Hu, J.; Yang, P.; others Superconductivity in infinite-layer nickelate La1- xCaxNiO2 thin films. Science advances 2022, 8, eabl9927

    work page 2022

  5. [5]

    A.; Ferenc Segedin, D.; LaBollita, H.; Song, Q.; Nica, E

    Pan, G. A.; Ferenc Segedin, D.; LaBollita, H.; Song, Q.; Nica, E. M.; Goodge, B. H.; Pierce, A. T.; Doyle, S.; Novakov, S.; C \'o rdova Carrizales, D.; others Superconductivity in a quintuple-layer square-planar nickelate. Nature materials 2022, 21, 160--164

    work page 2022

  6. [6]

    S.; Norman, M

    Botana, A. S.; Norman, M. R. Similarities and differences between LaNiO 2 and CaCuO 2 and implications for superconductivity. Physical Review X 2020, 10, 011024

    work page 2020

  7. [7]

    Li, J. et al. Identification of the superconductivity in bilayer nickelate La _3 Ni _2 O _7 upon 100 GPa. 2025; https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.11369

    arXiv 2025

  8. [8]

    Parzyck, C. T. et al. Superconductivity in the parent infinite-layer nickelate NdNiO _2 . 2024; https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.02007

    arXiv 2024

Show all 49 references
  1. [9]

    Y.; Lee, K.; Li, D.; Hwang, H

    Osada, M.; Wang, B. Y.; Lee, K.; Li, D.; Hwang, H. Y. Phase diagram of infinite layer praseodymium nickelate Pr 1- x Sr x NiO 2 thin films. Physical Review Materials 2020, 4, 121801

    2020

  2. [10]

    Y.; Lee, K.; Harvey, S

    Li, D.; Wang, B. Y.; Lee, K.; Harvey, S. P.; Osada, M.; Goodge, B. H.; Kourkoutis, L. F.; Hwang, H. Y. Superconducting dome in Nd 1- x Sr x NiO 2 infinite layer films. Physical Review Letters 2020, 125, 027001

    2020

  3. [11]

    Nature 2023, 621, 493--498

    Sun, H.; Huo, M.; Hu, X.; Li, J.; Liu, Z.; Han, Y.; Tang, L.; Mao, Z.; Yang, P.; Wang, B.; others Signatures of superconductivity near 80 K in a nickelate under high pressure. Nature 2023, 621, 493--498

    2023

  4. [12]

    Zhang, Y. et al. High-temperature superconductivity with zero resistance and strange-metal behaviour in La3Ni2O7- . Nature Physics 2024, 20, 1269--1273

    2024

  5. [13]

    Investigations of key issues on the reproducibility of high-Tc superconductivity emerging from compressed La3Ni2O7

    Zhou, Y.; Guo, J.; Cai, S.; Sun, H.; Wang, P.; Zhao, J.; Han, J.; Chen, X.; Chen, Y.; Wu, Q.; Ding, Y.; Xiang, T.; kwang Mao, H.; Sun, L. Investigations of key issues on the reproducibility of high-Tc superconductivity emerging from compressed La3Ni2O7. 2025; https://arxiv.org...

    2025 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Unlikelihood of a phonon mechanism for the high-temperature superconductivity in La3Ni2O7

    You, J.-Y.; Zhu, Z.; Del Ben, M.; Chen, W.; Li, Z. Unlikelihood of a phonon mechanism for the high-temperature superconductivity in La3Ni2O7. npj Computational Materials 2025, 11, 3

    2025

  7. [15]

    Wang, G. et al. Pressure-Induced Superconductivity In Polycrystalline La _ 3 Ni _ 2 O _ 7 - . Phys. Rev. X 2024, 14, 011040

    2024

  8. [16]

    Journal of the American Chemical Society 2024, 146, 7506--7514

    Wang, L.; Li, Y.; Xie, S.-Y.; Liu, F.; Sun, H.; Huang, C.; Gao, Y.; Nakagawa, T.; Fu, B.; Dong, B.; others Structure responsible for the superconducting state in La3Ni2O7 at high-pressure and low-temperature conditions. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2024, 146, 7506--7514

    2024

  9. [17]

    G.; Ajiro, M

    Yamaura, K.; Oh, S. G.; Ajiro, M. S.; Tsuboi, T.; Takano, M. La3Ni2O7: A Mixed-Valence Nickel Oxide with an Intermediate Oxidation State of Ni. Journal of Solid State Chemistry 1999, 145, 99--104

    1999

  10. [18]

    Tofield, S. A. M.; Lander, G. H.; Shapiro, S. M. Electronic structure and magnetic properties of La3Ni2O7. Journal of Solid State Chemistry 1992, 100, 95--100

    1992

  11. [19]

    Science China Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy 2023, 66, 217411

    Liu, Z.; Sun, H.; Huo, M.; Ma, X.; Ji, Y.; Yi, E.; Li, L.; Liu, H.; Yu, J.; Zhang, Z.; others Evidence for charge and spin density waves in single crystals of La3Ni2O7 and La3Ni2O6. Science China Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy 2023, 66, 217411

    2023

  12. [20]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.18343 2024,

    Cai, S.; Zhou, Y.; Sun, H.; Zhang, K.; Zhao, J.; Huo, M.; Nataf, L.; Wang, Y.; Li, J.; Guo, J.; others Low-temperature mean valence of nickel ions in pressurized La \_3 Ni \_2 O \_7 . arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.18343 2024,

    2024 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Charge and spin instabilities in superconducting La 3 Ni 2 O 7

    Chen, X.; Jiang, P.; Li, J.; Zhong, Z.; Lu, Y. Charge and spin instabilities in superconducting La 3 Ni 2 O 7. Physical Review B 2025, 111, 014515

    2025

  14. [22]

    Lechermann, F.; Gondolf, J.; B \"o tzel, S.; Eremin, I. M. Electronic correlations and superconducting instability in La 3 Ni 2 O 7 under high pressure. Physical Review B 2023, 108, L201121

    2023

  15. [23]

    Correlated electronic structure of La 3 Ni 2 O 7 under pressure

    Christiansson, V.; Petocchi, F.; Werner, P. Correlated electronic structure of La 3 Ni 2 O 7 under pressure. Physical Review Letters 2023, 131, 206501

    2023

  16. [24]

    Electron correlations and superconductivity in La 3 Ni 2 O 7 under pressure tuning

    Liao, Z.; Chen, L.; Duan, G.; Wang, Y.; Liu, C.; Yu, R.; Si, Q. Electron correlations and superconductivity in La 3 Ni 2 O 7 under pressure tuning. Physical Review B 2023, 108, 214522

    2023

  17. [25]

    LaBollita, H.; Bag, S.; Kapeghian, J.; Botana, A. S. Electronic correlations, layer distinction, and electron doping in the alternating single-layer--trilayer La 3 Ni 2 O 7 polymorph. Physical Review B 2024, 110, 155145

    2024

  18. [26]

    Effective Bi-Layer Model Hamiltonian and Density-Matrix Renormalization Group Study for the High-Tc Superconductivity in La3Ni2O7 under High Pressure

    Shen, Y.; Qin, M.; Zhang, G.-M. Effective Bi-Layer Model Hamiltonian and Density-Matrix Renormalization Group Study for the High-Tc Superconductivity in La3Ni2O7 under High Pressure. Chinese Physics Letters 2023, 40, 127401

    2023

  19. [27]

    Nature Communications 2024, 15, 4373

    Yang, J.; Sun, H.; Hu, X.; Xie, Y.; Miao, T.; Luo, H.; Chen, H.; Liang, B.; Zhu, W.; Qu, G.; others Orbital-dependent electron correlation in double-layer nickelate La3Ni2O7. Nature Communications 2024, 15, 4373

    2024

  20. [28]

    Electronic structure, dimer physics, orbital-selective behavior, and magnetic tendencies in the bilayer nickelate superconductor La 3 Ni 2 O 7 under pressure

    Zhang, Y.; Lin, L.-F.; Moreo, A.; Dagotto, E. Electronic structure, dimer physics, orbital-selective behavior, and magnetic tendencies in the bilayer nickelate superconductor La 3 Ni 2 O 7 under pressure. Physical Review B 2023, 108, L180510

    2023

  21. [29]

    Interplay of two E g orbitals in superconducting La 3 Ni 2 O 7 under pressure

    Lu, C.; Pan, Z.; Yang, F.; Wu, C. Interplay of two E g orbitals in superconducting La 3 Ni 2 O 7 under pressure. Physical Review B 2024, 110, 094509

    2024

  22. [30]

    Interlayer-coupling-driven high-temperature superconductivity in La 3 Ni 2 O 7 under pressure

    Lu, C.; Pan, Z.; Yang, F.; Wu, C. Interlayer-coupling-driven high-temperature superconductivity in La 3 Ni 2 O 7 under pressure. Physical Review Letters 2024, 132, 146002

    2024

  23. [31]

    C.; Adroja, D.; Yu, D.; Shen, B.; others Strong interlayer magnetic exchange coupling in La3Ni2O7- revealed by inelastic neutron scattering

    Xie, T.; Huo, M.; Ni, X.; Shen, F.; Huang, X.; Sun, H.; Walker, H. C.; Adroja, D.; Yu, D.; Shen, B.; others Strong interlayer magnetic exchange coupling in La3Ni2O7- revealed by inelastic neutron scattering. Science Bulletin 2024, 69, 3221--3227

    2024

  24. [32]

    Possible High T_c Superconductivity in La3Ni2O7 under High Pressure through Manifestation of a Nearly Half-Filled Bilayer Hubbard Model

    Sakakibara, H.; Kitamine, N.; Ochi, M.; Kuroki, K. Possible High T_c Superconductivity in La3Ni2O7 under High Pressure through Manifestation of a Nearly Half-Filled Bilayer Hubbard Model. Physical Review Letters 2024, 132

    2024

  25. [33]

    Possible s^ + \\ - -wave superconductivity in La3Ni2O7

    Yang, Q.-G.; Wang, D.; Wang, Q.-H. Possible s^ + \\ - -wave superconductivity in La3Ni2O7. Physical Review B 2023, 108

    2023

  26. [34]

    Effective model and pairing tendency in bilayer Ni-based superconductor La _3 Ni _2 O _7

    Gu, Y.; Le, C.; Yang, Z.; Wu, X.; Hu, J. Effective model and pairing tendency in bilayer Ni-based superconductor La _3 Ni _2 O _7 . 2023; https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.07275

    2023 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Lechermann, F.; Gondolf, J.; Bötzel, S.; Eremin, I. M. Electronic correlations and superconducting instability in La3Ni2O7 under high pressure. Physical Review B 2023, 108

    2023

  28. [36]

    Spin excitations in bilayer La 3 Ni 2 O 7 superconductors with interlayer pairing

    Lu, M.; Zhou, T. Spin excitations in bilayer La 3 Ni 2 O 7 superconductors with interlayer pairing. Physical Review B 2025, 111, 094504

    2025

  29. [37]

    Superexchange and charge transfer in the nickelate superconductor La3Ni2O7 under pressure

    Wú, W.; Luo, Z.; Yao, D.-X.; Wang, M. Superexchange and charge transfer in the nickelate superconductor La3Ni2O7 under pressure. Science China Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy 2024, 67

    2024

  30. [38]

    Effective model and electron correlations in trilayer nickelate superconductor La4Ni3O10

    Tian, P.-F.; Ma, H.-T.; Ming, X.; Zheng, X.-J.; Li, H. Effective model and electron correlations in trilayer nickelate superconductor La4Ni3O10. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 2024, 36, 355602

    2024

  31. [39]

    Superexchange and charge transfer in the nickelate superconductor La3Ni2O7 under pressure

    W \'u , W.; Luo, Z.; Yao, D.-X.; Wang, M. Superexchange and charge transfer in the nickelate superconductor La3Ni2O7 under pressure. Science China Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy 2024, 67, 117402

    2024

  32. [40]

    J.; Haverkort, M

    Green, R. J.; Haverkort, M. W.; Sawatzky, G. A. Bond disproportionation and dynamical charge fluctuations in the perovskite rare-earth nickelates. Physical Review B 2016, 94, 195127

    2016

  33. [41]

    s^ + \\ - -Wave Pairing and the Destructive Role of Apical-Oxygen Deficiencies in La _3 Ni _2 O _7 under Pressure

    Liu, Y.-B.; Mei, J.-W.; Ye, F.; Chen, W.-Q.; Yang, F. s^ + \\ - -Wave Pairing and the Destructive Role of Apical-Oxygen Deficiencies in La _3 Ni _2 O _7 under Pressure. Physical Review Letters 2023, 131

    2023

  34. [42]

    K.; Yu, Y.; Liu, Y.; Bhatt, L.; Li, J.; Thampy, V.; Kuo, C.-T.; Wang, B

    Ko, E. K.; Yu, Y.; Liu, Y.; Bhatt, L.; Li, J.; Thampy, V.; Kuo, C.-T.; Wang, B. Y.; Lee, Y.; Lee, K.; others Signatures of ambient pressure superconductivity in thin film La3Ni2O7. Nature 2025, 638, 935--940

    2025

  35. [43]

    Physical Review B 2022, 106, 165104

    Stoica, V.; Puggioni, D.; Zhang, J.; Singla, R.; Dakovski, G.; Coslovich, G.; Seaberg, M.; Kareev, M.; Middey, S.; Kissin, P.; others Magnetic order driven ultrafast phase transition in NdNiO 3. Physical Review B 2022, 106, 165104

    2022

  36. [44]

    The pseudogap in high-temperature superconductors: an experimental survey

    Timusk, T.; Statt, B. The pseudogap in high-temperature superconductors: an experimental survey. Reports on Progress in Physics 1999, 62, 61

    1999

  37. [45]

    R.; Botana, A

    LaBollita, H.; Pardo, V.; Norman, M. R.; Botana, A. S. Electronic structure and magnetic properties of La _ 3 Ni _ 2 O _ 7 under pressure: active role of the Ni- d_ x^2-y^2 orbitals. 2024; https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.17279

    2024 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Bulk superconductivity in pressurized trilayer nickelate Pr4Ni3O10 single crystals

    Zhang, E.; Peng, D.; Zhu, Y.; Chen, L.; Cui, B.; Wang, X.; Wang, W.; Zeng, Q.; Zhao, J. Bulk superconductivity in pressurized trilayer nickelate Pr4Ni3O10 single crystals. 2025; https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.17709

    2025 arXiv

  39. [47]

    QUANTUM ESPRESSO: a modular and open-source software project for quantum simulations of materials

    Giannozzi, P.; Andreussi, O.; Bristot, M.; Cavazzoni, A.; et al. QUANTUM ESPRESSO: a modular and open-source software project for quantum simulations of materials. 2009; Version 7, URL: https://www.quantum-espresso.org

    2009

  40. [48]

    Soft self-consistent pseudopotentials in a generalized eigenvalue formalism

    Vanderbilt, D. Soft self-consistent pseudopotentials in a generalized eigenvalue formalism. Physical Review B 1990, 41, 7892--7895

    1990

  41. [49]

    superconducting dome

    Project, T. M. La3Ni2O7. https://next-gen.materialsproject.org/materials/mp-18926?formula=La3Ni2O7, 2025; Accessed: 2024-03-11 mcitethebibliography achemso-demo.tex0000664000000000000000000013512015022707603012645 0ustar rootroot [journal=jacsat,manuscript=article] achemso ule...

    2025

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.