REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 37 references
Soft Photon, Gluon and Graviton Theorems in (A)dS from Conformal Invariance
T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash
Pith's one-line read The leading soft limit of photon, gluon, and graviton correlators in (A)dS is fixed by the special conformal Ward identity, yielding explicit soft theorems at order $q^0$ (and order $q^1$ for the graviton).
desk verdict New photon and subleading graviton soft theorems in (A)dS from conformal Ward identities, but the key IBP step in Appendix A is asserted, not proven—worth refereeing, not desk rejection. read the letter →
The pith
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
The reading
What carries the argument
The Mellin-Momentum formalism, in which the boundary correlator is represented as an integral of an on-shell amplitude $A_n$ times bulk-to-boundary propagators; the amplitude $A_n$ is obtained by amputation and obeys an exact special conformal Ward identity $\sum_a K_a^\mu A_n = 0$. The generator $K_J^\mu$ acting on $A_n$ carries a factor $1/k^2$ that, when combined with the soft propagator, produces a $1/q^2$ pole; integrating by parts converts the action on the bulk-to-bulk propagator into the equation-of-motion operator $D_\Delta$, which cancels the propagator by $D_\Delta G = \delta(z-z')$. The paper identifies the integration-by-parts boundary term with the inhomogeneous term on the right-hand side of the special conformal Ward identity for spinning correlators (Appendix A, following Appendix H of the related paper), and this identification is what turns the Ward identity into a recursion that fixes the soft expansion order by order.
What would settle it
Compute the $O(q)$ term of a five-point graviton correlator directly from the Witten-diagram integral without invoking the Ward identity, and compare with the prediction of $S^{(1)}$ in eq. (52); the paper verifies only up to local terms for the four-point case, so a non-local $O(q)$ mismatch at five points would refute the subleading theorem. A more targeted check is to evaluate the boundary term in eqs. (58)--(59) explicitly for a spin-2 external leg and test whether it equals the inhomogeneous SCWI term claimed in Appendix A.
Extended reading notes
Core claim
The paper's central claim is that, for tree-level Witten diagrams in (A)dS, the special conformal Ward identity on the on-shell amplitude determines the leading soft behavior of spinning correlators: for photons, $\langle J(q)\phi(k_1)\dots\rangle = -\tfrac{1}{2}\sum_h e_h \,\varepsilon_q\cdot\partial_{k_h}\langle\dots\rangle + O(q)$; for color-ordered gluons, $\langle J(q)J(k_1)\dots J(k_n)\rangle = \tfrac{1}{2}(\varepsilon_q\cdot\partial_{k_n} - \varepsilon_q\cdot\partial_{k_1})\langle J(k_1)\dots J(k_n)\rangle + O(q)$; and for gravitons in $d=3$, $\lim_{q\to 0}\langle T(q)T(k_1)\dots T(k_n)\rangle = (S^{(0)}+S^{(1)})\langle T(k_1)\dots T(k_n)\rangle$ with $S^{(0)} = -\tfrac{1}{2}\sum_a \varepsilon^{\mu\nu} k_{a\mu}\partial_{k_a^\nu}$ and $S^{(1)} = \tfrac{1}{4}\sum_a \varepsilon^{\mu\nu}q^\rho(k_{a\rho}\partial_{k_a^\mu}\partial_{k_a^\nu} - 2k_{a\mu}\partial_{k_a^\nu}\partial_{k_a^\rho} - 2\partial_{k_a^\mu}S_{a\nu\rho})$. At order $q^{-2}$ the Ward identity forces charge conservation for photons and universal couplings for gravitons; at higher orders it recursively fixes the remainder function $R$. The paper verifies the photon and gluon theorems up to five points and the graviton theorem up to the four-point correlator, and it shows that a higher-dimensional operator such as $\phi R^2$ modifies the graviton soft theorem already at leading order.
Load-bearing premise
The load-bearing premise is that the integration-by-parts boundary term produced when the special conformal generator acts on a Witten diagram is exactly the inhomogeneous term on the right-hand side of the special conformal Ward identity for spinning correlators; if that identification fails, the $1/q^2$ pole and the soft theorems built from it do not follow.
Editorial extensions
If this is right
- Charge conservation and universal graviton couplings follow from the $O(q^{-2})$ terms of the special conformal Ward identity, so the soft theorems imply these constraints on any (A)dS boundary theory.
- The leading soft photon and gluon theorems hold at order $q^0$ and receive contributions from all diagrams, in contrast to flat space where soft propagators dominate with $1/q$ singularities.
- The graviton correlator's leading and subleading soft factors are fully determined: $S^{(0)}$ acts as a momentum-space dilatation-like operator on each hard leg, and $S^{(1)}$ involves the special conformal generators when contracted with $\eta_{\mu\nu}$.
- Higher-dimensional operators such as $\phi R^2$ modify the leading graviton soft theorem, so the (A)dS soft theorems are sensitive to curvature corrections in a way flat-space soft theorems are not.
- The recursion yields infinitely many partial soft constraints at higher orders, determined only up to antisymmetric tensors $N$, paralleling the infinite partial soft theorems in flat space.
Reading between the lines
- These soft theorems provide boundary consistency conditions that could be imposed on inflationary wavefunction coefficients, giving a cosmological analogue of soft theorems as constraints on amplitudes.
- The paper's reliance on a single Ward identity suggests the same recursion may be derivable purely from boundary conformal bootstrap axioms (a direction the authors flag); if so, the soft theorems would follow without bulk diagrammatics.
- The undetermined antisymmetric tensors $N$ at higher orders are a testable ambiguity: imposing additional structure, such as color-kinematics duality or parity, could fix them and extend the theorems beyond leading order.
- The $\phi R^2$ example hints that a classification of which effective operators shift the leading soft graviton theorem would map the UV sensitivity of (A)dS soft limits, analogous to soft-theorem analyses in flat-space effective field theory.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. This paper derives soft theorems for photon, gluon, and graviton boundary correlators in (Anti)-de Sitter space at tree level. The authors work with on-shell Mellin-momentum amplitudes and impose the special conformal Ward identity (SCWI) order by order in the soft momentum. They claim a leading soft photon theorem, a leading soft gluon theorem, and both leading and subleading soft graviton theorems, together with an infinite partial soft expansion for photons and gluons. The central mechanism is an integration-by-parts step, described in Appendix A, that converts the action of (K_q + K_h) on the soft-exchange diagram into the bulk equation-of-motion operator D_{k_I}, producing the 1/q^2 pole from which the soft theorems are extracted. The paper also discusses modifications due to higher-dimensional operators in Section 6.
Significance. If the central derivation is correct, the paper establishes exact tree-level soft theorems in (A)dS for spinning correlators, generalizing flat-space soft theorems and showing that conformal Ward identities alone fix the leading (and, for gravitons, subleading) soft behavior. The results are derived without fitting parameters, and the paper includes explicit formulas and checks up to five points, which is a strength. However, the derivation is not self-contained: the key step in Appendix A, the identification of the IBP boundary term with the inhomogeneous term of the SCWI, is deferred to an unpublished appendix of a companion paper [29]. The truncation to only the epsilon_q^mu component of the vector Ward identity is also asserted rather than proved. These omissions are load-bearing, so the significance is currently conditional on the missing derivations being supplied.
major comments (4)
- [Appendix A, Eq. (59)] The step from Eq. (58) to Eq. (59) is the load-bearing point of the paper: it converts the action of (K_q + K_h) on the soft-exchange diagram into the equation-of-motion operator D_{k_I} acting on the bulk-to-bulk propagator, which produces the 1/q^2 pole used to derive charge conservation and the soft theorems. The text says that one performs integration by parts, discards the boundary term, and identifies it with the inhomogeneous term of the SCWI for spinning correlators, referring to Appendix H of [29]. This identification is not proved in the present paper, and it is exactly the difference between the true value of (K_q + K_h) on the diagram and the claimed expression. Without an explicit derivation or an independent check for a concrete diagram, Eqs. (13), (16), and consequently (26), (37), and (50)-(52) are not established.
- [Section 3, after Eq. (12)] The paper restricts to the epsilon_q^mu component of the vector SCWI, stated as 'we will focus solely on the epsilon_q^mu component', but does not prove that solving this single component is sufficient to determine the full amplitude. The final soft theorems are statements about the complete correlator, so one must show that the remaining components of the Ward identity are either automatically satisfied by the proposed solutions or impose no additional constraints. The same issue arises for the gluon and graviton cases in Sections 4 and 5.
- [Eq. (14) and Appendix A] There is an inconsistency in the normalization of the delta function for the bulk-to-bulk propagator. Eq. (14) states D_\Delta G(k,z,z') = \delta(z-z'), while Appendix A states D_\Delta G(z,z') = z^{d+1}\delta(z-z'). These differ by a factor of z^{d+1}. Since this propagator identity is used to eliminate the bulk integral and determine the z-dependence of the soft theorems, the discrepancy must be resolved and the correct normalization stated consistently.
- [Sections 3.1, 4.1, 5.1] The paper states that formulas are 'verified up to five points' for photons and gluons and for four- and five-graviton amplitudes. However, these verifications use amplitudes constructed within the same Mellin-momentum/on-shell formalism as the derivation, and therefore they do not independently test the contested IBP boundary-term identification in Appendix A or the restriction to the epsilon_q^mu component. An explicit check of Eq. (59) on a simple explicit diagram would be needed to validate the key step.
minor comments (4)
- [Abstract/Introduction] There is a typo in the Introduction: 'we perfer to make Lorentz symmetry manifest' should be 'we prefer'.
- [Section 2, Eq. (6)] The form of the special conformal generator K^\mu_A is quoted from prior work [27-29] without derivation or a self-contained definition. Since this operator is central to the paper, a brief derivation or a precise statement of which parts are assumed would improve the presentation.
- [Section 4, Eq. (36)] The notation switches between D_{k_n} and D^d_{k_I} without explicit definition; it would be clearer to use a single notation for the bulk-to-bulk propagator inverse throughout.
- [Section 6, Eq. (54)] The computation of the phi R^2 three-point amplitude is presented very tersely. Since this example is used to show sensitivity to higher-dimensional operators, a few more intermediate steps or a reference to where the computation is detailed would be helpful.
Circularity Check
The soft theorems depend on a same-author citation for the IBP boundary-term / SCWI inhomogeneous-term identification that produces the 1/q^2 pole.
-
self citation load bearing
[Appendix A, eqs. (58)-(59), used in Sec. 3 eq. (13)]
"As explained in Appendix H of [29], this corresponds exactly to the identity operator. The procedure simply requires integration by parts while discarding the boundary term—which we identify as the inhomogeneous term appearing on the right-hand side of the special conformal Ward identities for spinning correlators."
Equation (59) replaces the true action of (K_q+K_h) on the soft-exchange diagram by a term proportional to the EoM operator D_{k_I} acting on G; the resulting delta function is the only source of the 1/q^2 pole. The IBP boundary term is asserted to be the SCWI inhomogeneous term, with proof deferred to App. H of the authors' own [29]. If this identification fails, eq. (13), charge conservation (19), R^(0) (21), and the final theorems (26), (37), (50)-(52) all fail. Because [29] is a same-author preprint and the identification is not independently checked, the central derivation rests on a load-bearing self-citation.
full rationale
The paper does not fit parameters and the soft theorems are not assumed as inputs; the recursive expansion of the special conformal Ward identity is genuine derivational content. Some external anchors exist, notably the graviton check against [33,34] and the agreement of the higher-dimension amplitude with [32]. However, the key identity that produces the soft pole is not proved in this paper: the integration-by-parts boundary term is identified with the SCWI inhomogeneous term by reference to Appendix H of the authors' own companion paper [29]. The in-text verifications 'up to five points' are comparisons with amplitudes built in the same Mellin-momentum formalism and therefore do not independently certify that identification. This makes the self-citation load-bearing, but it is not a definitional or fitting circularity, so the score is moderate rather than maximal.
Assumptions & free parameters
assumptions (5)
- domain assumption Conformal Ward identity (3) holds for boundary correlators in (A)dS.
- domain assumption The special conformal generator K^mu_A for on-shell Mellin amplitudes has the form given in eq. (6), taken from the authors' prior work [29].
- domain assumption The on-shell amplitude A_n is obtained by amputating external states via equations of motion and discarding total-derivative/local terms, so the Ward identity (7) is exactly zero.
- ad hoc to paper The integration-by-parts boundary term in Appendix A can be identified with the inhomogeneous term in the SCWI for spinning correlators.
- domain assumption The gluon and graviton amplitudes factorize as in eqs. (28) and (39) using the three-point on-shell amplitude and a remainder function R, with OPE terms absorbed into R.
Cite this review
Pith. "Pith review of Soft Photon, Gluon and Graviton Theorems in (A)dS from Conformal Invariance." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/REOQO7AR
@misc{pith2026250611766,
author = {Pith},
title = {Pith review of: Soft Photon, Gluon and Graviton Theorems in (A)dS from Conformal Invariance},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/REOQO7AR}},
note = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.11766}
}
read the original abstract
We present new soft theorems for photon, gluon, and graviton correlators at tree level in (Anti)-de Sitter space. The results are derived by applying conformal Ward identities to constrain the structure of Witten diagrams.
Figures
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
- [29]
-
[1]
Weinberg, Infrared photons and gravitons , Phys
S. Weinberg, Infrared photons and gravitons , Phys. Rev. 140 (1965) B516–B524
work page 1965
-
[2]
Hodges, A simple formula for gravitational MHV amplitudes , arXiv:1204.1930
A. Hodges, A simple formula for gravitational MHV amplitudes , arXiv:1204.1930
arXiv 1930
-
[3]
T. He, V. Lysov, P. Mitra, and A. Strominger, BMS supertranslations and Weinberg’s soft graviton theorem, JHEP 05 (2015) 151, [ arXiv:1401.7026]
arXiv 2015
-
[4]
Strominger, On BMS Invariance of Gravitational Scattering , JHEP 07 (2014) 152, [arXiv:1312.2229]
A. Strominger, On BMS Invariance of Gravitational Scattering , JHEP 07 (2014) 152, [arXiv:1312.2229]
arXiv 2014
-
[5]
Bondi, M
H. Bondi, M. G. J. van der Burg, and A. W. K. Metzner, Gravitational waves in general relativity. 7. Waves from axisymmetric isolated systems , Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 269 (1962) 21–52
1962
-
[6]
R. K. Sachs, Gravitational waves in general relativity. 8. Waves in asymptotically flat space-times, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 270 (1962) 103–126
1962
-
[7]
Z. Bern, S. Davies, P. Di Vecchia, and J. Nohle, Low-Energy Behavior of Gluons and Gravitons from Gauge Invariance , Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014), no. 8 084035, [arXiv:1406.6987]
arXiv 2014
Show all 37 references
-
[8]
Broedel, M
J. Broedel, M. de Leeuw, J. Plefka, and M. Rosso, Constraining subleading soft gluon and graviton theorems, Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014), no. 6 065024, [ arXiv:1406.6574]
2014 arXiv
-
[9]
F. E. Low, Bremsstrahlung of very low-energy quanta in elementary particle collisions , Phys. Rev. 110 (1958) 974–977
1958
-
[10]
D. J. Gross and R. Jackiw, Low-Energy Theorem for Graviton Scattering , Phys. Rev. 166 (1968) 1287–1292
1968
-
[11]
Li, H.-H
Z.-Z. Li, H.-H. Lin, and S.-Q. Zhang, Infinite Soft Theorems from Gauge Symmetry , Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018), no. 4 045004, [ arXiv:1802.0314]
2018
-
[12]
Hamada and G
Y. Hamada and G. Shiu, Infinite Set of Soft Theorems in Gauge-Gravity Theories as Ward-Takahashi Identities, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 (2018), no. 20 201601, [arXiv:1801.0552]
2018
-
[13]
Creminelli, J
P. Creminelli, J. Nore˜ na, and M. Simonovi´ c,Conformal consistency relations for single-field inflation , JCAP 07 (2012) 052, [ arXiv:1203.4595]. 13
2012 arXiv
-
[14]
Hinterbichler, L
K. Hinterbichler, L. Hui, and J. Khoury, An Infinite Set of Ward Identities for Adiabatic Modes in Cosmology , JCAP 01 (2014) 039, [ arXiv:1304.5527]
2014 arXiv
-
[15]
Hinterbichler, L
K. Hinterbichler, L. Hui, and J. Khoury, Conformal Symmetries of Adiabatic Modes in Cosmology, JCAP 08 (2012) 017, [ arXiv:1203.6351]
2012 arXiv
-
[16]
Weinberg, Adiabatic modes in cosmology, Phys
S. Weinberg, Adiabatic modes in cosmology, Phys. Rev. D 67 (2003) 123504, [astro-ph/0302326]
2003 arXiv
-
[17]
Mirbabayi and M
M. Mirbabayi and M. Simonovi´ c,Weinberg Soft Theorems from Weinberg Adiabatic Modes, arXiv:1602.0519
-
[18]
Armstrong, A
C. Armstrong, A. Lipstein, and J. Mei, Enhanced soft limits in de Sitter space , JHEP 12 (2022) 064, [ arXiv:2210.0228]
2022
-
[19]
McFadden, Soft limits in holographic cosmology , JHEP 02 (2015) 053, [arXiv:1412.1874]
P. McFadden, Soft limits in holographic cosmology , JHEP 02 (2015) 053, [arXiv:1412.1874]
2015 arXiv
-
[20]
Chowdhury, A
C. Chowdhury, A. Lipstein, J. Mei, and Y. Mo, Soft limits of gluon and graviton correlators in Anti-de Sitter space , JHEP 10 (2024) 070, [ arXiv:2407.1605]
2024
-
[21]
Chowdhury, P
C. Chowdhury, P. Chowdhury, R. N. Moga, and K. Singh, Loops, recursions, and soft limits for fermionic correlators in (A)dS , JHEP 10 (2024) 202, [ arXiv:2408.0007]
2024
-
[22]
Albayrak and S
S. Albayrak and S. Kharel, Soft limits of gluon amplitudes in holography and cosmology, arXiv:2411.1365
-
[23]
Baumann, C
D. Baumann, C. Duaso Pueyo, A. Joyce, H. Lee, and G. L. Pimentel, The Cosmological Bootstrap: Spinning Correlators from Symmetries and Factorization , SciPost Phys. 11 (2021) 071, [ arXiv:2005.0423]
2021
-
[24]
Baumann, D
D. Baumann, D. Green, A. Joyce, E. Pajer, G. L. Pimentel, C. Sleight, and M. Taronna, Snowmass White Paper: The Cosmological Bootstrap , SciPost Phys. Comm. Rep. 2024 (2024) 1, [ arXiv:2203.0812]
2024
-
[25]
Arkani-Hamed, D
N. Arkani-Hamed, D. Baumann, H. Lee, and G. L. Pimentel, The Cosmological Bootstrap: Inflationary Correlators from Symmetries and Singularities , JHEP 04 (2020) 105, [ arXiv:1811.0002]
2020
-
[26]
Cheung, J
C. Cheung, J. Parra-Martinez, and A. Sivaramakrishnan, On-shell correlators and color-kinematics duality in curved symmetric spacetimes , JHEP 05 (2022) 027, [arXiv:2201.0514]
2022
-
[27]
Mei, Amplitude Bootstrap in (Anti) de Sitter Space And The Four-Point Graviton from Double Copy , arXiv:2305.1389
J. Mei, Amplitude Bootstrap in (Anti) de Sitter Space And The Four-Point Graviton from Double Copy , arXiv:2305.1389
-
[28]
Mei and Y
J. Mei and Y. Mo, On-shell Bootstrap for n-gluons and gravitons scattering in (A)dS, Unitarity and Soft limit , arXiv:2402.0911
-
[30]
Sleight, A Mellin Space Approach to Cosmological Correlators , JHEP 01 (2020) 090, [arXiv:1906.1230]
C. Sleight, A Mellin Space Approach to Cosmological Correlators , JHEP 01 (2020) 090, [arXiv:1906.1230]
2020
-
[31]
Sleight and M
C. Sleight and M. Taronna, Bootstrapping Inflationary Correlators in Mellin Space , JHEP 02 (2020) 098, [ arXiv:1907.0114]
2020
-
[32]
Bzowski, P
A. Bzowski, P. McFadden, and K. Skenderis, Implications of conformal invariance in momentum space, JHEP 03 (2014) 111, [ arXiv:1304.7760]
2014 arXiv
-
[33]
Bonifacio, H
J. Bonifacio, H. Goodhew, A. Joyce, E. Pajer, and D. Stefanyszyn, The graviton four-point function in de Sitter space , JHEP 06 (2023) 212, [ arXiv:2212.0737]
2023
-
[34]
Armstrong, H
C. Armstrong, H. Goodhew, A. Lipstein, and J. Mei, Graviton trispectrum from gluons , JHEP 08 (2023) 206, [ arXiv:2304.0720]
2023
-
[35]
Bianchi, S
M. Bianchi, S. He, Y.-t. Huang, and C. Wen, More on Soft Theorems: Trees, Loops and Strings, Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015), no. 6 065022, [ arXiv:1406.5155]
2015 arXiv
-
[36]
Elvang, C
H. Elvang, C. R. T. Jones, and S. G. Naculich, Soft Photon and Graviton Theorems in Effective Field Theory , Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 (2017), no. 23 231601, [ arXiv:1611.0753]
2017
-
[37]
Di Vecchia, R
P. Di Vecchia, R. Marotta, and M. Mojaza, Subsubleading soft theorems of gravitons and dilatons in the bosonic string , JHEP 06 (2016) 054, [ arXiv:1604.0335]. 15
2016
Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.