Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 42 references

\beta-Ga2O3-Based Heterojunctions: Exploring Growth Orientations and Alloying on Electronic Properties

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper establishes that growth orientation and interface strain alter beta-Ga2O3/(AlxGa1-x)2O3 band offsets by more than 2 eV, and that device simulations built on these offsets reproduce measured forward-bias diode currents.

desk verdict A credible, useful band-offset study for beta-Ga2O3/(AlxGa1-x)2O3 whose qualitative orientation/strain result is solid, but whose quantitative alloy offsets rest on an untested linear interpolation of the interface potential lineup. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.12173 v2 pith:OXL7PJRR submitted 2025-06-13 cond-mat.mtrl-sci physics.app-ph

Mohamed Abdelilah Fadla , Khushabu Agrawal , Paolo La Torraca , Myrta Grüning , Karim Cherkaoui , Lorenzo Stella This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sciphysics.app-ph PACS 71.15.Mb71.20.Nr73.40.-c
keywords beta-Ga2O3bandoffsetsheterojunctions(AlxGa1-x)2O3alloyspseudomorphicstrainSchottkybarrierdiodesgrowthorientationTCADdevicesimulation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that band offsets at beta-Ga2O3/(AlxGa1-x)2O3 interfaces are not fixed material constants but move strongly with growth orientation and with the strain a pseudomorphic alloy film inherits from the substrate. Using hybrid-functional density functional theory, the authors compute valence- and conduction-band offsets for four orientations and find values ranging from 0.53 eV to -0.05 eV for the valence-band offset across (100)B and (-201). They then insert these first-principles offsets into Schottky diode device simulations and show that the forward-bias current-voltage characteristics reproduce published measurements for roughly 21-22% aluminium. If correct, the work makes growth orientation and strain practical design knobs for ultra-wide-bandgap power devices, and it explains part of the scatter in previously reported band-offset values.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the band-offset construction that combines bulk band-edge energies, referenced to the average electrostatic potential, with the interface potential lineup computed from fully relaxed superlattice structures: VBO = (bulk VBM energy difference) + interface potential lineup, and likewise for the CBO. The films are strained in plane to match the substrate lattice, then relaxed out of plane, and the lineup is extracted from the macroscopic average electrostatic potential of the formed interface. For alloy compositions, the lineup is obtained by linear interpolation using Ga2O3, ordered GaAlO3, and Al2O3 endpoint calculations rather than by explicit alloy interfaces at every concentration.

What would settle it

Compute explicit disordered (Al0.25Ga0.75)2O3/Ga2O3 superlattices for two orientations and compare CBO/VBO with values linearly interpolated from the endpoints; a deviation beyond numerical noise would falsify the quantitative alloy predictions. Alternatively, measure core-level photoemission band offsets on (100)- and (-201)-oriented films with the same aluminium fraction and check the roughly 0.5 eV-scale orientation split.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that both the magnitude and the type of band offset at beta-Ga2O3/(AlxGa1-x)2O3 interfaces depend so strongly on growth orientation and on the in-plane strain of the pseudomorphic film that previously reported offset values cannot be treated as unique. For the pure Ga2O3/Al2O3 interface, the (100)B orientation shows the largest offsets, VBO = 0.53 eV and CBO = 2.44 eV, while the (-201) orientation shows the smallest, with a VBO of only -0.05 eV. The strain matters because the aluminum oxide film's band edges shift noticeably under the in-plane tensile strain imposed by the beta-Ga2O3 substrate, and the interface potential lineup then determines the final offset. When the computed offsets are fed into Schottky barrier diode models, the simulated forward-bias I-V curves reproduce experimental data for (Al0.21Ga0.79)2O3 and (Al0.22Ga0.78)2O3 layers on beta-Ga2O3(010), with reverse-bias discrepancies attributed to the ideal, defect-free junction assumption. The conclusion is that orientation and strain engineering are first-order levers for tailoring electron confinement, built-in voltage, and diode switching behavior in this material system.

Load-bearing premise

For alloy compositions the interface potential-lineup term is linearly interpolated from three endpoint values rather than recomputed for explicit alloy interfaces at every concentration, so a strongly nonlinear lineup would shift all composition-dependent offsets.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • On (100)B the computed offsets are largest (VBO = 0.53 eV, CBO = 2.44 eV), so that orientation gives the strongest electron confinement and the highest simulated I_ON/I_OFF ratio in Schottky diodes.
  • On (-201) the near-zero valence-band offset and low built-in voltage point to a fast-turn-on diode with higher forward current.
  • Raising aluminium content mainly raises the conduction band of the alloy, so alloy composition acts mostly on the conduction-band offset and electron confinement rather than on the valence band.
  • Forward-bias I-V curves built from first-principles offsets reproduce published measurements at 21-22% aluminium, and remaining reverse-bias discrepancies are attributable to an ideal, defect-free junction.
  • Orientation-dependent built-in voltage shifts the simulated C-V curves, which otherwise behave like a MOS-type deep-depletion capacitor, similar to structures reported to confine a two-dimensional electron gas.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the orientation dependence survives in experiment, growth-axis selection could be used to set the Schottky barrier height and the heterojunction band offset at the same time, reducing the need for composition or thickness grading in some diode designs.
  • The paper's linear interpolation of the interface lineup is the most exposed assumption; explicit alloy superlattice calculations at one intermediate concentration would be the quickest test and might refine the quantitative CBO values without changing the orientation ordering.
  • A similar strain- and orientation-aware treatment could apply to other low-symmetry oxide heterojunctions, where bulk band-edge shifts under pseudomorphic strain are large enough to change the sign of an offset.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports hybrid-DFT (HSE06) calculations of band offsets at pseudomorphic beta-Ga2O3/(AlxGa1-x)2O3 heterojunctions for four growth orientations, (100)B, (010), (001)B, and (-201), including the effect of strain on the Al2O3 and alloy layers. The authors use explicit superlattice calculations for the pure end members and an ordered x=0.5 GaAlO3 composition, with the alloy interface potential lineup obtained by linear interpolation. The resulting offsets and electron affinities are fed into TCAD simulations of Pt/(AlxGa1-x)2O3/Ga2O3 Schottky barrier diodes, and the simulated I-V curves are compared with published experimental data at x=0.21 and x=0.22. The central claims are that growth orientation and strain change the band offsets substantially, both in magnitude and type, and that TCAD simulations using the first-principles parameters reproduce the forward-bias experimental I-V characteristics.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the paper provides a useful systematic map of orientation- and strain-dependent band offsets for the important beta-Ga2O3/(AlxGa1-x)2O3 materials system and demonstrates a pathway for embedding first-principles offsets into TCAD device models. The strengths of the work include the use of explicit superlattice calculations for the pure beta-Ga2O3/theta-Al2O3 interfaces, the care taken to include strain in the film reference energies, the use of nonpolar symmetric terminations to avoid built-in fields, and quantitative comparison with published I-V data. The orientation dependence reported for the pure Al2O3 interface, including the near-zero VBO for the (-201) orientation, is physically plausible and defensible. However, the alloy-composition dependence, which is a central part of the paper's scope, rests on an interpolation assumption for the interface potential lineup that is not validated explicitly, and this limits the quantitative reliability of the composition-dependent offsets and of the validation claims built on them.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section III, Eqs. (1)-(2) and text near Fig. 1] The paper states that 'The values of the average electrostatic potential differences, dV_AB, for alloys are obtained by means of linear interpolation using Ga2O3, GaAlO3 and Al2O3.' Only three compositions are actually computed for the interface lineup: x=0, the ordered x=0.5 GaAlO3, and x=1. This is a load-bearing assumption for the composition-dependent VBO and CBO values. The interface potential lineup can be nonlinear in x and can depend on the cation arrangement; the x=0.5 anchor is an ordered structure with all octahedral Al, which is not representative of the random SQS alloys used elsewhere in the paper, especially for x>0.5 where Al begins to occupy tetrahedral sites. Since the (-201) orientation has a pure-Al2O3 VBO of only -0.05 eV, an interpolation error of order 0.1 eV at finite x could change the sign of the offset and hence the alignment type. Please compute the potential lineup from explicit (AlxGa1-x)2O3/Ga2O3 superlattices for at least two or three additional compositions using SQS models, or otherwise provide a quantitative bound on the interpolation error and show that the main qualitative conclusions are insensitive to it.
  2. [Section III, Figs. 4-5 and Table S2] The experimental validation in Figs. 4 and 5 is presented as supporting the calculated band offsets, but the TCAD comparisons at x=0.21 and x=0.22 use electron affinities from separate surface-slab calculations rather than the interface potential lineup that is the central quantity in Eqs. (1) and (2). The forward-bias current in these devices is controlled by the Ga2O3 electron affinity and the Pt/alloy Schottky barrier height, so the agreement with experiment does not directly test the interpolated dV_AB values or the orientation-dependent interface dipoles. The statement that the simulations validate the computed offsets should therefore be softened, and the fact that the validation is indirect should be acknowledged. In addition, the agreement is described only qualitatively; reporting the extracted barrier heights or ideality factors from the simulated and experimental curves would provide a more quantitative assessment.
  3. [Section III, Eq. (3) and Table I] The band-gap bowing parameter b is fitted separately for each orientation, and the HSE06 mixing parameter is set to 0.32 rather than the standard 0.25. These are free parameters in the calculation, and the reported offset values inherit their uncertainty. This is not itself an error, but the paper should state explicitly how sensitive the final VBO/CBO values are to the choice of mixing parameter and to the bowing fit. In particular, the near-zero VBO for the (-201) orientation may be within the uncertainty of the HSE mixing parameter choice, and this possibility should be discussed when making claims about offset-type reversal.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Section II, pseudopotential description] The text lists 'd10s2p1 for indium' although indium is not part of the systems studied here; this appears to be a typo for gallium, and the intended valence configurations for Ga, Al, and O should be stated unambiguously.
  2. [Section II, Eqs. (1)-(2)] The text refers to the 'conduction band maximum' when describing CBM quantities; this should be the conduction band minimum throughout.
  3. [Section IV, Conclusion] The conclusion states 'Al concentrations of 0.22 % and 0.21 %' where the intended values are x=0.22 and x=0.21 (i.e., 22% and 21% Al content); please correct the percentages.
  4. [Table I and associated text] Table I reports lattice parameters a, b, c for bulk materials and strained films but does not clearly indicate which axes are in-plane versus out-of-plane for each orientation; please clarify the axis conventions or refer more explicitly to the transformation matrix in the Supporting Information.
  5. [Reference [36]] Reference [36] for the Ginestra TCAD software is incomplete; please provide a version number or a more specific citation so readers can identify the exact tool and version used.
  6. [Abstract and title] The abstract uses 'AlGaO' instead of the standard notation '(AlxGa1-x)2O3', and the title/abstract phrasing 'Alloying Effect' is slightly inconsistent with the stated scope 'on Electronic Properties'; please make the notation consistent.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: band offsets are computed from first principles, and experimental I-V comparisons are used only as independent validation, not as fitting targets.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained rather than circular. VBO and CBO values are obtained from HSE06 bulk band-edge energies plus an explicitly computed interface potential lineup, ΔV_AB, from superlattice calculations (Eqs. 1 and 2). The alloy ΔV_AB values are stated to be obtained 'by means of linear interpolation using Ga2O3, GaAlO3 and Al2O3'; this is an approximation that limits quantitative accuracy, but it is not a fit to the experimental I-V data and does not define the band offsets in terms of the quantities being 'predicted'. The TCAD simulations feed these independently computed offsets and affinities into device models and compare the resulting I-V characteristics with experimental data from Refs. [37] and [39]; no parameter is adjusted to reproduce the measured currents. The only self-citation (Ref. [17]) concerns crack formation in pseudomorphic epitaxial growth and is not load-bearing for the central band-offset or TCAD results. The orientation-dependent offsets, including the near-zero VBO at the (-201) orientation, are explicit DFT results. The linear-interpolation caveat for alloy ΔV_AB is a genuine accuracy risk, not a circular step. The paper therefore merits a low circularity score.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical entities. The main externally supplied assumptions are pseudomorphic growth, the restriction to nonpolar symmetric terminations, the use of SQS to model disorder, and the linear interpolation of the alloy potential lineup. The last is the most fragile and directly affects the quantitative composition-dependent offsets.

free parameters (2)
  • HSE06 exact-exchange mixing parameter = 0.32
    Chosen in Section II for all electronic-structure calculations. It is a hand-set functional parameter, not derived, and it shifts absolute VBM and CBM positions and hence the band offsets.
  • Band-gap bowing parameter b per orientation = about 1 eV; 1.2 eV for (100)
    Fit of Eq. (3) to the computed Eg(x) values in Section III. It is reported as a fit and used mainly to describe the gap trend; it does not enter the band-offset construction directly.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Pseudomorphic growth: the film adopts the substrate in-plane lattice constants and the same monoclinic structure and orientation as beta-Ga2O3.
    Invoked in the Introduction and used to set up all superlattices. Real films may relax, crack, or form different phases beyond the critical thickness.
  • domain assumption Only symmetric and non-polar terminations are considered for each growth orientation.
    Stated in Section II. This choice avoids built-in potentials but excludes possibly relevant polar or asymmetric interfaces that could change the offsets.
  • ad hoc to paper The average electrostatic potential difference at alloy interfaces is linearly interpolated from Ga2O3, GaAlO3, and Al2O3 reference superlattices.
    Stated in Section III. This approximation is load-bearing for all composition-dependent offsets and is not validated against explicit alloy-interface supercells at intermediate x.
  • domain assumption Special quasirandom structures with two- and three-atom clusters represent the true random alloy disorder.
    Used in Section II for (AlxGa1-x)2O3 alloys. Longer-range correlation effects beyond these clusters are neglected.
  • domain assumption SCAN and HSE06 functionals give adequate structural and electronic properties for these oxides.
    All band edges and offsets depend on this choice. No benchmark against GW or other high-level methods is provided, and the forward-bias I-V comparison is an indirect check.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of \beta-Ga2O3-Based Heterojunctions: Exploring Growth Orientations and Alloying on Electronic Properties." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/OXL7PJRR

@misc{pith2026250612173,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: \beta-Ga2O3-Based Heterojunctions: Exploring Growth Orientations and Alloying on Electronic Properties},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/OXL7PJRR}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.12173}
}
abstract

We investigate the effects of alloying and growth orientation on the electronic properties of the ultra-wide bandgap semiconductor \beta-Ga2O3 and pseudomorphic (AlxGa1-x)2O3 alloy heterojunctions. Band offsets are computed from first principles using density functional theory (DFT) with the Heyd-Scuseria-Ernzerhof hybrid functional for different Al concentrations and four growth orientations, namely (100)B, (010), (001)B, and ($\bar{2}$01). Significant variations are found and ascribed to the strained pseudomorphic alloys. The values of the band offsets are fed into technology computer-aided design (TCAD) models of Schottky barrier diodes (SBD). I-V and C-V characteristics from the TCAD models show reasonable agreement with recent experimental measurements in the forward bias region. Discrepancies in the negative bias region are expected due to the ideality of the Schottky junctions considered in this study. Our findings underscore the critical role of growth orientation and strain in the accurate modelling of \beta-Ga2O3-based SBD.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.12173 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Calculated band offsets between β- Ga2O3 and θ- Al2O3 for (100)B, (010), (001)B, and (¯201) orientations. CBO, equal to 0.53 eV and 2.44 eV, respectively. In contrast, the (¯201) orientation displays the smallest offsets, with a VBO of only -0.05 eV. The VBO reported for (¯201) aligns closely with those experimentally determined in Ref. [23] by means of XPS for films prepared by ALD. The discrepancy between the CBO … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The computed absolute energies of the conduction band minimum (CBM) and valence [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. (a) Simulated I-V characteristics of Pt/(Al [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Comparison of simulated (ideal) and experimental I-V data from Ref. 39 for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Comparison of simulated (ideal) and experimental I-V data from Ref.37 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

42 extracted references · 40 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Higashiwaki, K

    M. Higashiwaki, K. Sasaki, A. Kuramata, T. Masui, and S. Yamakoshi, Gallium oxide (Ga2O3) metal-semiconductor field-effect transistors on single-crystal β-Ga2O3 (010) substrates, Ap- plied Physics Letters 100, 013504 (2012)

    work page 2012

  2. [2]

    W. S. Hwang, A. Verma, H. Peelaers, V. Protasenko, S. Rouvimov, H. (Grace) Xing, A. Seabaugh, W. Haensch, C. V. de Walle, Z. Galazka, M. Albrecht, R. Fornari, and D. Jena, 16 High-voltage field effect transistors with wide-bandgap β-Ga2O3 nanomembranes, Applied Physics Letters 104, 203111 (2014)

    work page 2014

  3. [3]

    B. W. Krueger, C. S. Dandeneau, E. M. Nelson, S. T. Dunham, F. S. Ohuchi, and M. A. Olmstead, Variation of Band Gap and Lattice Parameters of β-(Al x Ga 1- x ) 2 O 3 Powder Produced by Solution Combustion Synthesis, Journal of the American Ceramic Society 99, 2467 (2016)

    work page 2016

  4. [4]

    J. Li, X. Chen, T. Ma, X. Cui, F.-F. Ren, S. Gu, R. Zhang, Y. Zheng, S. P. Ringer, L. Fu, H. H. Tan, C. Jagadish, and J. Ye, Identification and modulation of electronic band structures of single-phase β − (AlxGa1 − x)2O3 alloys grown by laser molecular beam epitaxy, Applied Physics Letters 113, 041901 (2018)

    work page 2018

  5. [5]

    Peelaers, J

    H. Peelaers, J. B. Varley, J. S. Speck, and C. G. Van De Walle, Structural and electronic properties of Ga2O3-Al2O3 alloys, Applied Physics Letters 112, 242101 (2018)

    work page 2018

  6. [6]

    Ratnaparkhe and W

    A. Ratnaparkhe and W. R. L. Lambrecht, Quasiparticle Self-Consistent GW Study of (Ga1- xAlx)2O3 Alloys in Monoclinic and Corundum Structures, physica status solidi (b) 257, 1900317 (2020), eprint: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/pssb.201900317

    work page doi:10.1002/pssb.201900317 2020

  7. [7]

    S. Mu, M. Wang, H. Peelaers, and C. G. Van De Walle, First-principles surface energies for monoclinic Ga2O3 and Al2O3 and consequences for cracking of (Al x Ga1- x )2O3, APL Materials 8, 091105 (2020)

    work page 2020

  8. [8]

    H. W. Kim, H. Ko, Y.-C. Chung, and S. B. Cho, Heterostructural phase diagram of ga2o3– based solid solution with al2o3, Journal of the European Ceramic Society 41, 611 (2021)

    work page 2021

Show all 42 references
  1. [9]

    Liu and C.-K

    X. Liu and C.-K. Tan, Electronic properties of monoclinic (InxGa1-x)2O3 alloys by first- principle, AIP Advances 9, 035318 (2019)

    2019

  2. [10]

    Papadogianni, C

    A. Papadogianni, C. Wouters, R. Schewski, J. Feldl, J. L¨ ahnemann, T. Nagata, E. Kluth, M. Feneberg, R. Goldhahn, M. Ramsteiner, M. Albrecht, and O. Bierwagen, Molecular beam epitaxy of single-crystalline bixbyite ( In 1 - x Ga x ) 2 O 3 films ( x a ≤ b 0.18 ): Structural pro...

    2022

  3. [11]

    H. U. Lee, H. W. Kim, G. Fatti, H. Ko, and S. B. Cho, Dominant Effects of Epitaxial Strain on the Phase Control of Heterostructural (In x Ga 1– x ) 2 O 3 Alloys, ACS Applied Electronic Materials 4, 2711 (2022). 17

    2022

  4. [12]

    M. B. Maccioni and V. Fiorentini, Phase diagram and polarization of stable phases of (Ga 1- x In x ) 2 O 3, Applied Physics Express 9, 041102 (2016)

    2016

  5. [13]

    Nishinaka, N

    H. Nishinaka, N. Miyauchi, D. Tahara, S. Morimoto, and M. Yoshimoto, Incorporation of indium into ε -gallium oxide epitaxial thin films grown via mist chemical vapour deposition for bandgap engineering, CrystEngComm 20, 1882 (2018)

    2018

  6. [14]

    Peelaers, D

    H. Peelaers, D. Steiauf, J. B. Varley, A. Janotti, and C. G. Van De Walle, ( In x Ga 1 - x ) 2 O 3 alloys for transparent electronics, Physical Review B 92, 085206 (2015)

    2015

  7. [15]

    Kranert, J

    C. Kranert, J. Lenzner, M. Jenderka, M. Lorenz, H. Von Wenckstern, R. Schmidt-Grund, and M. Grundmann, Lattice parameters and Raman-active phonon modes of (In x Ga1– x )2O3 for x < 0.4, Journal of Applied Physics 116, 013505 (2014)

    2014

  8. [16]

    Fares, M

    C. Fares, M. Xian, D. J. Smith, M. R. McCartney, M. Kneiß, H. Von Wenckstern, M. Grund- mann, M. Tadjer, F. Ren, and S. J. Pearton, Changes in band alignment during annealing at 600 °C of ALD Al2O3 on (InxGa1 - x)2O3 for x = 0.25–0.74, Journal of Applied Physics 127, 105701 (2020)

    2020

  9. [17]

    M. A. Fadla, M. Gruning, and L. Stella, Effective band structure and crack formation analysis in pseudomorphic epitaxial growth of (in x ga1–x) 2o3 alloys: A first-principles study, ACS omega 9, 15320 (2024)

    2024

  10. [18]

    B. W. Krueger, C. S. Dandeneau, E. M. Nelson, S. T. Dunham, F. S. Ohuchi, and M. A. Olmstead, Variation of band gap and lattice parameters of β-(alxga1- x) 2o3 powder produced by solution combustion synthesis, Journal of the American Ceramic Society 99, 2467 (2016)

    2016

  11. [19]

    Kranert, M

    C. Kranert, M. Jenderka, J. Lenzner, M. Lorenz, H. Von Wenckstern, R. Schmidt-Grund, and M. Grundmann, Lattice parameters and raman-active phonon modes of β-(alxga1- x) 2o3, Journal of Applied Physics 117 (2015)

    2015

  12. [20]

    X. Wang, Z. Chen, F. Zhang, K. Saito, T. Tanaka, M. Nishio, and Q. Guo, Temperature dependence of raman scattering in β-(alga) 2o3 thin films, AIP Advances 6 (2016)

    2016

  13. [21]

    Lyu, Band offsets at the interfaces between β-ga 2 o 3 and al 2 o 3, Physical Review Materials 7, 014603 (2023)

    S. Lyu, Band offsets at the interfaces between β-ga 2 o 3 and al 2 o 3, Physical Review Materials 7, 014603 (2023)

    2023

  14. [22]

    T. Wang, W. Li, C. Ni, and A. Janotti, Band gap and band offset of ga 2 o 3 and (al x ga 1- x) 2 o 3 alloys, Physical Review Applied 10, 011003 (2018)

    2018

  15. [23]

    P. H. Carey IV, F. Ren, D. C. Hays, B. Gila, S. Pearton, S. Jang, and A. Kuramata, Band alignment of al2o3 with (- 201) β-ga2o3, Vacuum 142, 52 (2017). 18

    2017

  16. [24]

    Hinuma, T

    Y. Hinuma, T. Gake, and F. Oba, Band alignment at surfaces and heterointerfaces of al 2 o 3, ga 2 o 3, in 2 o 3, and related group-iii oxide polymorphs: A first-principles study, Physical Review Materials 3, 084605 (2019)

    2019

  17. [25]

    Seacat, J

    S. Seacat, J. L. Lyons, and H. Peelaers, Computational design of optimal heterostructures for β-ga 2 o 3, Physical Review Materials 8, 014601 (2024)

    2024

  18. [26]

    Seacat, J

    S. Seacat, J. L. Lyons, and H. Peelaers, Orthorhombic alloys of ga2o3 and al2o3, Applied physics letters 116 (2020)

    2020

  19. [27]

    S. Mu, H. Peelaers, Y. Zhang, M. Wang, and C. G. Van de Walle, Orientation-dependent band offsets between (alxga1- x) 2o3 and ga2o3, Applied Physics Letters 117 (2020)

    2020

  20. [28]

    Kresse and J

    G. Kresse and J. Furthm¨ uller, Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calcula- tions using a plane-wave basis set, Physical Review B 54, 11169 (1996), publisher: American Physical Society

    1996

  21. [29]

    Kresse and J

    G. Kresse and J. Furthm¨ uller, Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set, Computational materials science 6, 15 (1996)

    1996

  22. [30]

    Kresse and J

    G. Kresse and J. Hafner, Ab initio molecular dynamics for liquid metals, Physical review B 47, 558 (1993)

    1993

  23. [31]

    J. Sun, A. Ruzsinszky, and J. Perdew, Strongly Constrained and Appropriately Normed Semilocal Density Functional, Physical Review Letters 115, 036402 (2015), publisher: Amer- ican Physical Society

    2015

  24. [32]

    J. Heyd, G. E. Scuseria, and M. Ernzerhof, Hybrid functionals based on a screened Coulomb potential, The Journal of Chemical Physics 118, 8207 (2003), https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jcp/article-pdf/118/18/8207/10847843/8207 1 online.pdf

    2003

  25. [33]

    A. V. Krukau, O. A. Vydrov, A. F. Izmaylov, and G. E. Scuseria, Influence of the exchange screening parameter on the performance of screened hybrid functionals, The Journal of Chem- ical Physics 125, 224106 (2006)

    2006

  26. [34]

    P. E. Bl¨ ochl, Projector augmented-wave method, Physical Review B 50, 17953 (1994), pub- lisher: American Physical Society

    1994

  27. [35]

    van de Walle, P

    A. van de Walle, P. Tiwary, M. de Jong, D. L. Olmsted, M. Asta, A. Dick, D. Shin, Y. Wang, L. Q. Chen, and Z. K. Liu, Efficient stochastic generation of special quasirandom structures, Calphad 42, 13 (2013)

    2013

  28. [36]

    Applied Materials, Ginestra ® (2025). 19

    2025

  29. [37]

    P. P. Sundaram, F. Alema, A. Osinsky, and S. J. Koester, β-(AlxGa1-x)2O3/Ga2O3 het- erostructure Schottky diodes for improved VBR2/RON, Journal of Vacuum Science & Tech- nology A 40, 043211 (2022)

    2022

  30. [38]

    D. Guo, Q. Guo, Z. Chen, Z. Wu, P. Li, and W. Tang, Review of Ga2O3-based optoelectronic devices, Materials Today Physics 11, 100157 (2019)

    2019

  31. [39]

    D. H. Mudiyanselage, D. Wang, and H. Fu, Ultrawide bandgap vertical β-(AlxGa1-x)2O3 Schottky barrier diodes on free-standing β-Ga2O3 substrates, Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology A 41, 023201 (2023)

    2023

  32. [40]

    ˚Ahman, G

    J. ˚Ahman, G. Svensson, and J. Albertsson, A Reinvestigation of β-Gallium Oxide, Acta Crys- tallographica Section C: Crystal Structure Communications 52, 1336 (1996), number: 6 Pub- lisher: International Union of Crystallography

    1996

  33. [41]

    Latreche, Combined thermionic emission and tunneling mechanisms for the analysis of the leakage current for ga2o3 schottky barrier diodes, SN Applied Sciences 1, 188 (2019)

    A. Latreche, Combined thermionic emission and tunneling mechanisms for the analysis of the leakage current for ga2o3 schottky barrier diodes, SN Applied Sciences 1, 188 (2019)

    2019

  34. [42]

    Okumura, Y

    H. Okumura, Y. Kato, T. Oshima, and T. Palacios, Demonstration of lateral field-effect tran- sistors using Sn-doped β-(AlGa)2O3 (010), Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 58, SBBD12 (2019), publisher: IOP Publishing. 20

    2019

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.