Theoretical Summary: Moriond QCD and High-Energy Interactions 2025

Peter Skands

REVIEW 1 major objections 6 minor 54 references

Theoretical Summary: Moriond QCD and High-Energy Interactions 2025

T0 review · 1 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper presents a compact theory status of QCD in 2025, centered on first NNLL parton showers, restored factorization, and a $0.9\sigma$ muon $g-2$ gap.

desk verdict Skands's Moriond 2025 theory summary is exactly what it claims to be: a faithful, well-organised index to the talks, with no new results and no red flags. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.13338 v2 pith:JWKIUY24 submitted 2025-06-16 hep-ph hep-th

Peter Skands This is my paper · ORCID

classification hep-phhep-th

keywords QCDtheorysummaryMoriond2025partonshowersresummationfactorizationPDFevolutionstrongcouplingmuong-2

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper is a theory summary of the talks at Moriond QCD and High-Energy Interactions 2025, and its central claim is that its one-paragraph condensations capture the main points of most of those contributions. If accurate, it provides a compact, reliable map of where QCD and related theory stand in 2025: first next-to-next-to-leading-log parton showers, an explicit three-loop factorization-restoration result, near-complete N$^3$LO PDF evolution, and a muon $g-2$ theory-versus-experiment difference of $0.9\sigma$. The paper itself adds no new calculation; its contribution is the curated status report and the links to the original sources.

What carries the argument

The carrying device is the sectioned summary format: each talk is reduced to a single takeaway and pinned to a numbered source. Within that format, the load-bearing elements are the reported benchmark numbers, such as the $1\%$ validation level, the specific $\alpha_s$ values, the first ten Mellin moments, and the $0.9\sigma$ $g-2$ difference, because they allow a reader to assess the state of the field without reading each contribution, while the references supply the proofs and details.

What would settle it

Pick any attributed claim, such as the $1\%$ validation of the non-global-log Monte Carlo resummation or the $0.9\sigma$ $g-2$ difference, and check it against the cited original talk or paper; a single misquoted number or misattributed result would show the summary is not fully faithful.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper establishes a snapshot of the theory programme at the 2025 Moriond QCD meeting. It organizes the contributions into eight thematic sections and assigns each talk at least one concrete takeaway: a first NNLL-accurate parton shower, a Monte Carlo resummation of non-global logarithms validated at the $1\%$ level, the first resummation of super-leading logarithms, an explicit three-loop proof that collinear factorization is restored below the veto scale, the last missing piece for N$^3$LO PDF evolution, and a muon $g-2$ prediction whose remaining difference from experiment is $0.9\sigma$. The paper's claim is that these condensations, together with their references, represent the main points of the field as presented at the meeting.

Load-bearing premise

The paper's worth rests on the assumption that each one-paragraph summary faithfully reproduces what the speaker actually presented, and that the quoted numbers and validations are correct as reported.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

First NNLL-accurate parton showers imply that $e^+e^-$ event-shape predictions and Monte Carlo fragmentation tunes can be upgraded from NLL to NNLL accuracy.
If factorization is restored below the veto scale, conventional PDF factorization remains valid up to three loops for scales below $Q_0$, and jet-gap observables require combining super-leading and non-global logarithms above that scale.
A $0.9\sigma$ $g-2$ difference means that, under the paper's hybrid lattice-plus-data treatment of hadronic vacuum polarization, the muon anomaly no longer points clearly to new physics.
With the four-loop $g\to gg$ splitting moments in hand, N$^3$LO PDF evolution is practically complete; PDF fits can move to N$^3$LO, where QED corrections reduce Higgs cross sections by about $1\%$.
In heavy-ion collisions, adding a careful hydrodynamic background to in-medium jet simulation reproduces the jet $p_T$ spectrum but still leaves the nonzero high-$p_T$ $v_2$ unexplained.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Editorial inference: the summary's overall arc suggests that the precision-QCD frontier is shifting from fixed-order matrix elements to subleading-logarithmic and non-global structures; a test would be whether LHC jet-gap data prefer the super-leading-plus-non-global combination over standard showers.
Editorial inference: the $0.9\sigma$ $g-2$ conclusion is conditional on the stated hybrid of lattice for small distances and data-driven input for large distances; including alternative $e^+e^-$ data sets noted in the paper could move the significance, so the number should be read as scheme-dependent.
Editorial inference: if the $1\%$-level validation of the non-global-log Monte Carlo resummation holds up when the code is released, non-global log resummation could become a routine correction in jet and event-shape codes; a direct check is to compare the public code against LHC rapidity-gap measurements.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Short version: this is a conference summary, and on its own terms it is a good one. Skands states plainly what the paper is — a summary of the theory talks at Moriond QCD 2025 — attributes every substantive point to a named talk with a reference, and claims nothing new for himself. The reader's take and the stress-test note both land: no internal inconsistency, no numerical claim that clashes with the cited sources as far as can be checked, and no selective framing that would misrepresent a talk. The only textual blemish, the typo 'an 0-2.8 fm window', is cosmetic.

What the paper does well: organisation. The eight sections (hard processes, resummation and PDFs, flavour, αs, lattice, heavy ions, BSM, methodology) give practitioners a genuinely useful index of who presented what and which preprint to read. Each entry carries the actual content — what was computed, at what accuracy, with what caveat — rather than just a title. The highlights are well chosen: the first NNLL-accurate parton shower, the MARZILI non-global-log shower validated at 1% against GNOLE and PanScales, the first resummation of super-leading logarithms, the factorisation-restoration result at 3-loop order, the g−2 update, and the spread of αs determinations. The g−2 paragraph is the best example: it names the BaBar/KLOE vs CMD-3 tension, the lattice 'window' compromise, and the resulting 0.9σ difference without pretending the dispute is settled. The Overview's scope note — that some talks appear only in the experimental summary — is a transparent limitation, not a defect.

Soft spots, in proportion: minor, mostly genre-inherent. The technical claims are not verifiable from the manuscript; the paper's value rests on faithful reporting. A few compressed phrases, like the 1% MARZILI validation and Neubert's 'explicit proof', should send the reader to the cited papers before quoting them. The 'no indication of new physics' line for g−2 is the speaker's conclusion delivered briskly; the caveats live in the references. The self-citations (refs 19 and 38) are contextual background and benign. Nothing here is load-bearing.

Who this is for: practitioners and students who want a fast map of current QCD, flavour, heavy-ion, and BSM theory activity. It changes no scientific quantity, but it is an honest, competent documentation job.

Recommendation: if it lands in a venue with a proceedings or summary track, send it to a light-touch referee whose job is to spot-check attributions rather than validate physics. Faithful reporting is a real checkable claim, and this paper is careful about it. A desk reject at a pure research journal would also be defensible; either way, do not treat it as a research contribution.

Referee Report

1 major / 6 minor

Summary. This paper is the written version of the theoretical summary talk at Moriond QCD and High-Energy Interactions 2025. It surveys theory talks across eight topic areas: hard processes, resummation/factorisation/PDFs, quark flavour physics, strong coupling, nonperturbative and lattice QCD, heavy-ion physics, BSM physics, and methodology. The paper attributes each summarized result to the original speaker and provides references to the corresponding publications or preprints. The central claim, as stated in the abstract, is that the paper accurately summarises the main points of most of the theory contributions presented at the conference.

Significance. If accurate, the paper is a useful and compact status report of the current theory landscape in QCD, flavour, heavy-ion, and BSM physics, with clear pointers to the primary literature. Its value lies in faithful reporting and in the completeness of the reference list. The manuscript makes no new technical claims and contains no derivations or data to check. The attributions I checked are internally consistent, and the explicit note that some experimental/theory talks are only covered in the experimental summary is a transparent scope limitation. The main caveat is that the summary's accuracy cannot be independently verified from the text alone; it rests on the author's good-faith reporting of each talk.

major comments (1)

[Section 2 (Resummation, Factorisation, PDFs), paragraph on M. Neubert and following Figure 1] The manuscript contains a large block of extraneous text from an ERC grant proposal, beginning with 'Moriond QCD & High Energy Interactions — April 4, 2025Matthias Neubert — 8' and continuing through the passage with its own references [1]–[18] and the second 'Figure 1: Diagrammatic representation of two Glauber-gluon exchanges...'. This material is not part of the conference summary, uses reference numbering that conflicts with the paper's own numbered reference list, and visually interrupts the summary of Neubert's talk. The authors should remove this inserted block entirely and ensure that the genuine figure caption ('Figure 1 – Illustration (adapted from the talk by M. Neubert) of factorisation restoration in gaps-between-jets') is attached to the actual figure accompanying the summary.

minor comments (6)

[Section 5] Typo: 'an 0-2.8 fm window' should read 'a 0-2.8 fm window'.
[Section 3] Typo: 'a a heavy-quark expansion was used' should read 'a heavy-quark expansion was used'.
[Section 4] Formatting: 'αs(mc) = 0 .445' and 'αs(mc) = 0 .400' contain an erroneous space before the decimal point.
[Section 2] Formatting: 'the gap-fractionQ0 value' should be 'the gap-fraction Q0 value'.
[General] The styling of αs(mZ) is inconsistent (with and without a space before the parenthesis) across Sections 4 and 5; please make it uniform.
[Overview] The paper states that it summarises 'most' contributions but does not explain how the selection was made; a brief sentence on criteria for inclusion (or explicit referral to the experimental summary) would improve transparency.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the paper is a conference summary whose claims are attributed to external talks and literature, with no derivation reducing to its own inputs.

full rationale

The paper is a theoretical summary of Moriond QCD 2025 talks, explicitly aiming to 'summarise main points of most of these contributions.' It contains no derivation chain, no fitted parameters, and no prediction that is constructed from its own output. Every technical claim is presented as a report of someone else's presented result and is backed by a citation to the relevant external paper or preprint. The two references to the author's own work (ref. 19, used for the contextual remark that full-fledged shower Monte Carlos give similar conclusions about intrinsic transverse momentum, and ref. 38, used as a pointer to related coalescence/reconnection studies) are background remarks, not load-bearing assumptions for any derived claim. The self-citations do not support a uniqueness theorem, do not define a quantity in terms of the claimed result, and do not substitute for an independent derivation. The manuscript's limitation that some experimental/theory talks appear only in the experimental summary is a stated scope choice, not a circular step. Faithful reporting of external results is inherently not independently verifiable from the summary alone, but that is a verification limitation, not circularity, and this analysis found no internal evidence of misattribution or self-referential reduction. Accordingly, the appropriate score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 2 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters or invented entities appear because the paper is a summary of existing results. The main assumptions are the fidelity and completeness of the reporting of the conference talks.

assumptions (2)

domain assumption The conference talks summarized by the author took place and are represented accurately.
The entire paper is a report on external presentations; the manuscript provides only references and the author's descriptions, not the talks themselves. Invoked throughout Sections 1-8.
domain assumption Standard QCD and particle-physics background is accepted without derivation.
The summaries assume familiarity with frameworks such as perturbation theory, factorisation, resummation, PDFs, lattice QCD, and heavy-ion hydrodynamics, as seen in the abstract and throughout.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Theoretical Summary: Moriond QCD and High-Energy Interactions 2025." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/JWKIUY24

@misc{pith2026250613338,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Theoretical Summary: Moriond QCD and High-Energy Interactions 2025},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/JWKIUY24}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.13338}
}

read the original abstract

The theory talks at Moriond QCD and High-Energy Interactions 2025 covered the full range of scales from BSM, top, Higgs, EW, and hard QCD physics, through resummation, factorisation, and PDFs, to hadronic, heavy-ion, nonperturbative, and lattice QCD. A few talks also touched on methodologies. We here summarise main points of most of these contributions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.13338 by the authors.

**Figure 1.** Diagrammatic representation of two Glauber-gluon exchanges (red) between the initial-state partons in a proton-proton collision. Collinear gluons moving along the beam directions are drawn in blue, soft gluons emitted into the gap are shown in green. One might think that these e↵ects are numerically very small, because they only arise in higher orders, but I argue that they can naturally be of the same order as a o… view at source ↗

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

54 extracted references · 38 canonical work pages

[1]

Jaskiewicz, S

S. Jaskiewicz, S. Jones, R. Szafron, and Y. Ulrich. The structure of quark mass corrections in the gg→HH amplitude at high-energy. 12 2024. arXiv:2501.00587

arXiv 2024
[18]

W. Zhan, S. Yang, M. Liu, L. Han, and F. Hautmann. A pT -ratio observable for studies of intrinsic transverse momentum of partons from Drell-Yan pT spectra. In 59th Ren- contres de Moriond on QCD and High Energy Interactions: Moriond QCD 2025 , 5 2025. arXiv:2505.06973

arXiv 2025
[2]

Campillo Aveleira, G

B. Campillo Aveleira, G. Heinrich, M. Kerner, and L. Kunz. Probing anomalous Higgs boson couplings in Higgs plus jet production at NLO QCD with full mt-dependence. JHEP, 04:060, 2025

work page 2025
[3]

Buccioni, X

F. Buccioni, X. Chen, W.-J. Feng, T. Gehrmann, A. Huss, and M. Marcoli. Precise Predictions for Event Shapes in Diphoton Production at the LHC. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 134(17):171901, 2025

work page 2025
[4]

Huss et al

A. Huss et al. NNLOJET: a parton-level event generator for jet cross sections at NNLO QCD accuracy. 3 2025. arXiv:2503.22804

arXiv 2025
[5]

Ferrario Ravasio

S. Ferrario Ravasio. Building Next-to-Next Leading Logarithmic parton showers: the PanScales recipe. In 59th Rencontres de Moriond on QCD and High Energy Interactions: Moriond QCD 2025 , 5 2025. arXiv:2505.13395

arXiv 2025
[6]

van Beekveld et al

M. van Beekveld et al. Introduction to the PanScales framework, version 0.1. SciPost Phys. Codeb. , 2024:31, 2024

work page 2024
[7]

Becher, N

T. Becher, N. Schalch, and X. Xu. Resummation of Next-to-Leading Nonglobal Loga- rithms at the LHC. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 132(8):081602, 2024

work page 2024

Show all 54 references

[8]

N. Schalch. Resummation of Next-to-Leading Non-Global Logarithms . PhD thesis, Bern U., 2024

2024
[9]

Banfi, F

A. Banfi, F. A. Dreyer, and P. Monni. Higher-order non-global logarithms from jet calculus. JHEP, 03:135, 2022

2022
[10]

Becher, M

T. Becher, M. Neubert, D. Y. Shao, and M. Stillger. Factorization of non-global LHC observables and resummation of super-leading logarithms. JHEP, 12:116, 2023

2023
[11]

Becher, P

T. Becher, P. Hager, G. Martinelli, M. Neubert, D. Schwienbacher, and M. Stillger. Super- leading logarithms in pp → 2 jets. JHEP, 01:171, 2025

2025
[12]

Becher, P

T. Becher, P. Hager, S. Jaskiewicz, M. Neubert, and D. Schwienbacher. Factorization Restoration through Glauber Gluons. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 134(6):061901, 2025

2025
[13]

Falcioni, F

G. Falcioni, F. Herzog, S. Moch, A. Pelloni, and A. Vogt. Four-loop splitting functions in QCD – the gluon-gluon case –. Phys. Lett. B , 860:139194, 2025

2025
[14]

Combination of aN 3LO PDFs and implications for Higgs production cross-sections at the LHC

Thomas Cridge et al. Combination of aN 3LO PDFs and implications for Higgs production cross-sections at the LHC. 11 2024. arXiv:2411.05373

2024 arXiv
[15]

Towards N 3LO PDFs and their implications for Higgs production cross- sections

Felix Hekhorn. Towards N 3LO PDFs and their implications for Higgs production cross- sections. In 59th Rencontres de Moriond on QCD and High Energy Interactions: Moriond QCD 2025 , 5 2025

2025
[16]

Piloneta and A

S. Piloneta and A. Vladimirov. Angular distributions of Drell-Yan leptons in the TMD factorization approach. JHEP, 12:059, 2024

2024
[17]

Vladimirov

A. Vladimirov. Angular structure of Drell-Yan reaction in the TMD factorization ap- proach. In 59th Rencontres de Moriond on QCD and High Energy Interactions: Moriond QCD 2025 , 5 2025. arXiv:2505.11064

2025 arXiv
[19]

Skands, S

P. Skands, S. Carrazza, and J. Rojo. Tuning PYTHIA 8.1: the Monash 2013 Tune. Eur. Phys. J. C , 74(8):3024, 2014

2013
[20]

Gopal and N

A. Gopal and N. Gubernari. Unitarity bounds with subthreshold and anomalous cuts for b-hadron decays. Phys. Rev. D , 111(3):L031501, 2025

2025
[21]

D. Mishra. LCSR predictions for B → K Hadronic Matrix Elements. In 59th Ren- contres de Moriond on QCD and High Energy Interactions: Moriond QCD 2025 , 5 2025. arXiv:2505.16426

2025 arXiv
[22]

Huber, T

T. Huber, T. Hurth, J. Jenkins, and E. Lunghi. Inclusive B→Xsℓ+ℓ− with a hadronic mass cut. JHEP, 12:117, 2023

2023
[23]

Huber, T

T. Huber, T. Hurth, J. Jenkins, E. Lunghi, Q. Qin, and K. K. Vos. Inclusive B→Xsℓ+ℓ− at the LHC: theory predictions and new-physics reach. JHEP, 11:130, 2024. [Erratum: JHEP 05, 099 (2025)]

2025
[24]

Dey and S

U. Dey and S. Nandi. Correlated study on some Bc→P and Bc→S wave channels in light of new inputs. 3 2025. arXiv:2503.01693

2025 arXiv
[25]

D’Ambrosio and M

G. D’Ambrosio and M. Knecht. Predictions for the Rare Kaon Decays KS,L → π0ℓ+ℓ− from QCD in the Limit of a Large Number of Colours. Universe, 10(12):457, 2024

2024
[26]

M. A. Benitez, A. Bhattacharya, A. H. Hoang, V. Mateu, M. D. Schwartz, I. W. Stewart, and X. Zhang. A Precise Determination of αs from the Heavy Jet Mass Distribution. 2
[27]

M. A. Benitez. Determining αs(mZ) from the Heavy Jet Mass distribution. 6 2025. arXiv:2506.07723

2025 arXiv
[28]

Ahmadova et al

F. Ahmadova et al. Precise Determination of the Strong Coupling Constant from Dijet Cross Sections up to the Multi-TeV Range. 12 2024. arXiv:2412.21165

2024 arXiv
[29]

Aoki et al

Y. Aoki et al. FLAG Review 2024. 11 2024. arXiv:2411.04268

2024 arXiv
[30]

Y. Che, L. Chen, J. Wu, X. Lou, X. Chen, X. Guan, Y.-Q. Ma, and M. Ruan. Determi- nation of the Strong Coupling Constant αs from Inclusive Semi-leptonicB Meson Decays. 12 2024. arXiv:2412.02480

2024
[31]

J. Wu, X. Lou, Y. Che, G. Li, Y. Huang, M. Ruan, and J. Ye. Strong coupling from inclusive semileptonic decay of charmed mesons*. Chin. Phys. C , 49(2):023001, 2025

2025
[32]

Aoyama et al

T. Aoyama et al. The anomalous magnetic moment of the muon in the Standard Model. Phys. Rept. , 887:1–166, 2020

2020
[33]

Boccaletti et al

A. Boccaletti et al. High precision calculation of the hadronic vacuum polarisation con- tribution to the muon anomaly. 7 2024. arXiv:2407.10913

2024 arXiv
[34]

X. Ji. Parton Physics on a Euclidean Lattice. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 110:262002, 2013

2013
[35]

Jo´ o, J

B. Jo´ o, J. Karpie, K. Orginos, A. V. Radyushkin, D. G. Richards, and S. Zafeiropoulos. Parton Distribution Functions from Ioffe Time Pseudodistributions from Lattice Calcula- tions: Approaching the Physical Point. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 125(23):232003, 2020

2020
[36]

Khan et al

T. Khan et al. Unpolarized gluon distribution in the nucleon from lattice quantum chromodynamics. Phys. Rev. D , 104(9):094516, 2021

2021
[37]

Jiang, H

C. Jiang, H. Li, S.-Y. Li, S. Liu, and X. Yin. D∗jet fragmentation function paradox and combination mechanism. Commun. Theor. Phys. , 75(2):025201, 2023

2023
[38]

Altmann, A

J. Altmann, A. Dubla, V. Greco, A. Rossi, and P. Skands. Towards the understanding of heavy quarks hadronization: from leptonic to heavy-ion collisions. Eur. Phys. J. C , 85(1):16, 2025

2025
[39]

Baldenegro, M

C. Baldenegro, M. Praszalowicz, C. Royon, and A. M. Stasto. Scaling laws of elastic proton-proton scattering differential cross sections. Phys. Lett. B , 856:138960, 2024

2024
[40]

Prasza lowicz

M. Prasza lowicz. Universal properties of elastic pp cross section from the ISR to the LHC. In 59th Rencontres de Moriond on QCD and High Energy Interactions: Moriond QCD 2025 , 5 2025. arXiv:2505.11885

2025 arXiv
[41]

Forshaw and R

J. Forshaw and R. Sandapen. Holographic analysis of the pion. Phys. Rev. D , 111(3):034024, 2025

2025
[42]

I. Kolb´ e. JEWEL on a (2+1)D background with applications to small systems and substructure. 3 2023. arXiv:2303.14166

2023 arXiv
[43]

K. C. Zapp. JEWEL 2.0.0: directions for use. Eur. Phys. J. C , 74(2):2762, 2014

2014
[44]

G. Nijs, W. van der Schee, U. G¨ ursoy, and R. Snellings. Bayesian analysis of heavy ion collisions with the heavy ion computational framework Trajectum. Phys. Rev. C , 103(5):054909, 2021

2021
[45]

Giacalone and E

G. Giacalone and E. Speranza. Initial-state-driven spin correlations in high-energy nuclear collisions. 2 2025. arXiv:2502.13102

2025 arXiv
[46]

Abu-Ajamieh, S

F. Abu-Ajamieh, S. Kumbhakar, R. Sarkar, and S. Vempati. Improved Bounds and Global Fit of Flavor-Violating Charged Lepton Yukawa Couplings post LHC. 5 2025. arXiv:2505.12208

2025 arXiv
[47]

Miralles, Y

V. Miralles, Y. Peters, E. Vryonidou, and J. K. Winter. Sensitivity to CP -violating effective couplings in the top-Higgs sector. JHEP, 06:052, 2025

2025
[48]

A. N. Rossia and E. Vryonidou. CP-odd effects at NLO in SMEFT WH and ZH production. JHEP, 11:142, 2024

2024
[49]

M. O. A. Thomas and E. Vryonidou. CP violation in loop-induced diboson production. JHEP, 03:038, 2025

2025
[50]

Baker, Timothy Martonhelyi, Andrea Thamm, and Riccardo Torre

Michael J. Baker, Timothy Martonhelyi, Andrea Thamm, and Riccardo Torre. A Sim- plified Model of Heavy Vector Singlets for the LHC and Future Colliders. 7 2024. arXiv:2407.11117

2024 arXiv
[51]

Sub-GeV dark matter and nano-Hertz gravitational waves from a classically conformal dark sector

Sowmiya Balan, Torsten Bringmann, Felix Kahlhoefer, Jonas Matuszak, and Carlo Tasillo. Sub-GeV dark matter and nano-Hertz gravitational waves from a classically conformal dark sector. 2 2025. arXiv:2502.19478

2025
[52]

Bernlochner, Marco Fedele, Tim Kretz, Ulrich Nierste, and Markus T

Florian U. Bernlochner, Marco Fedele, Tim Kretz, Ulrich Nierste, and Markus T. Prim. Model independent bounds on heavy sterile neutrinos from the angular distribution of B → D∗ℓν decays. JHEP, 01:040, 2025

2025
[53]

M. A. Lim and R. Poncelet. Robust estimates of theoretical uncertainties at fixed-order in perturbation theory. 12 2024. arXiv:2412.14910

2024
[54]

Aoude, H

R. Aoude, H. Banks, C. D. White, and M. J. White. Probing new physics in the top sector using quantum information. 5 2025. arXiv:2505.12522

2025 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Jaskiewicz, S

S. Jaskiewicz, S. Jones, R. Szafron, and Y. Ulrich. The structure of quark mass corrections in the gg→HH amplitude at high-energy. 12 2024. arXiv:2501.00587

arXiv 2024

[2] [18]

W. Zhan, S. Yang, M. Liu, L. Han, and F. Hautmann. A pT -ratio observable for studies of intrinsic transverse momentum of partons from Drell-Yan pT spectra. In 59th Ren- contres de Moriond on QCD and High Energy Interactions: Moriond QCD 2025 , 5 2025. arXiv:2505.06973

arXiv 2025

[3] [2]

Campillo Aveleira, G

B. Campillo Aveleira, G. Heinrich, M. Kerner, and L. Kunz. Probing anomalous Higgs boson couplings in Higgs plus jet production at NLO QCD with full mt-dependence. JHEP, 04:060, 2025

work page 2025

[4] [3]

Buccioni, X

F. Buccioni, X. Chen, W.-J. Feng, T. Gehrmann, A. Huss, and M. Marcoli. Precise Predictions for Event Shapes in Diphoton Production at the LHC. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 134(17):171901, 2025

work page 2025

[5] [4]

Huss et al

A. Huss et al. NNLOJET: a parton-level event generator for jet cross sections at NNLO QCD accuracy. 3 2025. arXiv:2503.22804

arXiv 2025

[6] [5]

Ferrario Ravasio

S. Ferrario Ravasio. Building Next-to-Next Leading Logarithmic parton showers: the PanScales recipe. In 59th Rencontres de Moriond on QCD and High Energy Interactions: Moriond QCD 2025 , 5 2025. arXiv:2505.13395

arXiv 2025

[7] [6]

van Beekveld et al

M. van Beekveld et al. Introduction to the PanScales framework, version 0.1. SciPost Phys. Codeb. , 2024:31, 2024

work page 2024

[8] [7]

Becher, N

T. Becher, N. Schalch, and X. Xu. Resummation of Next-to-Leading Nonglobal Loga- rithms at the LHC. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 132(8):081602, 2024

work page 2024