REVIEW 3 cited by
BOW: Training Language Models to Reason Over Plausible Next Words
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Next-word prediction (NWP) trains language models against a single observed continuation, even though many contexts admit multiple plausible next words. Recent RL-based next-word reasoning methods make this tension explicit: they reward a model for producing a rationale that supports one context-conditioned continuation, which can turn a pre-existing preference into a confident, self-justifying trajectory. We introduce BOW, an RL framework that instead trains models to produce self-contained, neutral, and comprehensive descriptions of the plausible next-word space. BOW's core reward is mediated by the generated trajectory. The policy conditions on the full context, but a frozen scorer assigns the core reward from the trajectory alone, without receiving the original context as a separate input. The trajectory may restate relevant context; the bottleneck is the missing direct context-to-scorer path in the core reward. BOW-Reg adds a lightweight breadth regularizer around this core term to discourage premature collapse. Across ten general reasoning benchmarks, BOW remains competitive with the original instruction models and often outperforms trained baselines. On both backbones, BOW-Reg achieves the highest SharedRef correctness and the lowest HoWN-Simple single-sense collapse. Human evaluation further shows that BOW-Reg elicits broader next-word reasoning trajectories, while intrinsic NWP results show that these trajectories remain predictive.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Likelihood scoring for continuations of mathematical text: a self-supervised benchmark with tests for shortcut vulnerabilities
Presents a likelihood-based benchmark for equation-suffix prediction in technical papers with controls to detect shortcut vulnerabilities in model forecasts.
-
Likelihood scoring for continuations of mathematical text: a self-supervised benchmark with tests for shortcut vulnerabilities
A new benchmark uses separate predictor and scorer LLMs to test whether forecast strings improve likelihood of hidden mathematical equation continuations, with controls that detect priming shortcuts.
-
RECAP: Transparent Inference-Time Emotion Alignment for Medical Dialogue Systems
RECAP is an inference-time framework using cognitive appraisal theory to enhance emotional alignment and transparency in medical dialogue systems across model scales.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.