Pith. sign in

REVIEW 7 cited by

Steering LLM Thinking with Budget Guidance

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2506.13752 v1 pith:WTG7LWHI submitted 2025-06-16 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords budgetthinkingguidancereasoninglengthperformanceaccuracybaseline
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recent deep-thinking large language models often reason extensively to improve performance, but such lengthy reasoning is not always desirable, as it incurs excessive inference costs with disproportionate performance gains. Controlling reasoning length without sacrificing performance is therefore important, but remains challenging, especially under tight thinking budgets. We propose budget guidance, a simple yet effective method for steering the reasoning process of LLMs toward a target budget without requiring any LLM fine-tuning. Our approach introduces a lightweight predictor that models a Gamma distribution over the remaining thinking length during next-token generation. This signal is then used to guide generation in a soft, token-level manner, ensuring that the overall reasoning trace adheres to the specified thinking budget. Budget guidance enables natural control of the thinking length, along with significant token efficiency improvements over baseline methods on challenging math benchmarks. For instance, it achieves up to a 26% accuracy gain on the MATH-500 benchmark under tight budgets compared to baseline methods, while maintaining competitive accuracy with only 63% of the thinking tokens used by the full-thinking model. Budget guidance also generalizes to broader task domains and exhibits emergent capabilities, such as estimating question difficulty. The source code is available at: https://github.com/UMass-Embodied-AGI/BudgetGuidance.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 7 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. FlowCompile: An Optimizing Compiler for Structured LLM Workflows

    cs.CL 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 8.0 of 10

    FlowCompile performs compile-time design space exploration on structured LLM workflows to produce reusable high-quality configuration sets that outperform routing baselines with up to 6.4x speedup.

  2. OS-Pruner: Pruning Chains-of-Thought of Reasoning Models via Optimal Stopping

    cs.AI 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A lightweight optimal-stopping policy on frozen reasoning LLMs cuts CoT length 20–60% with minimal accuracy loss by trading answer correctness against token cost via a tunable λ.

  3. When Less is Enough: Efficient Inference via Collaborative Reasoning

    cs.LG 2026-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A large model generates a compact reasoning signal that a small model uses to solve tasks, reducing the large model's output tokens by up to 60% on benchmarks like AIME and GPQA.

  4. Are Large Reasoning Models Interruptible?

    cs.CL 2025-10 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Interrupting large reasoning models or changing the problem mid-thought sharply degrades accuracy, with up to 60% drops and distinct failure modes: reasoning leakage, panic, and self-doubt.

  5. Efficient Reasoning on the Edge

    cs.LG 2026-03 accept novelty 5.5 of 10

    LoRA adapters, budget-forced GRPO, dynamic switching, parallel verification and FPTQuant enable practical chain-of-thought reasoning on quantized Qwen2.5-7B for edge devices.

  6. DiffAdapt: Difficulty-Adaptive Reasoning for Token-Efficient LLM Inference

    cs.CL 2025-10 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    DiffAdapt detects problem difficulty via entropy in reasoning traces and applies one of three fixed inference strategies per question, cutting token usage up to 22.4% with comparable or better accuracy across five mod...

  7. Base Models Know How to Reason, Thinking Models Learn When

    cs.AI 2025-10 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    A hybrid model that steers base LLM activations with vectors fitted to thinking-model traces recovers part of the performance gap, but the conclusion that thinking models only learn 'when' is not established by the ex...

Pith tools