Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 3 cited by

R-symmetries, anomalies and non-invertible defects from non-BPS branes

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Non-BPS monopoles, not ordinary branes, realize the R-symmetry operator in holography.

desk verdict Non-BPS KK monopoles as symmetry operators for isometries: a convincing but not airtight proposal, with an explicit Klebanov-Witten check that deserves referee time. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.13859 v2 pith:BZQOVS23 submitted 2025-06-16 hep-th

Hugo Calvo , Francesco Mignosa , Diego Rodriguez-Gomez This is my paper
classification hep-th
keywords non-BPSbranesKaluza-KleinmonopolesholographicsymmetryoperatorsR-symmetryanomaliesKlebanov-Wittentheorynon-invertiblesymmetriesTFTisometry
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proposes that the symmetry operators for continuous abelian symmetries that come from isometries of a holographic spacetime—the $U(1)_R$ superconformal R-symmetry being the main example—are not ordinary BPS branes but non-BPS Kaluza-Klein monopoles. The existence of these monopoles is predicted by a chain of S- and T-dualities, and their worldvolume action is fixed by consistency with the known BPS KK monopole action. Applied to the Klebanov-Witten theory, the proposal reproduces, from the brane action alone, the R-symmetry topological operator of the five-dimensional Symmetry Theory, including the $U(1)_R$ self-'t Hooft anomaly $\kappa_R = \tfrac{3}{2}N^2$ and the mixed anomaly $\kappa_B = -2N^2$ with the baryonic symmetry. For a choice of boundary conditions corresponding to gauging the baryonic symmetry, the same action produces the non-invertible R-symmetry operator. The result matters because it extends the brane realization of symmetry operators from gauge-field symmetries to geometrical, isometry symmetries, where continuous symmetry operators seemed hardest to obtain.

What carries the argument

The central object is the non-BPS Kaluza-Klein monopole, a string-theory soliton with a Taub-NUT direction aligned with the isometry being gauged and a real tachyon whose condensation describes its decay into a BPS KK monopole. Its worldvolume action in the tachyon vacuum is $S^{\rm KKB}_{\rm WZ} = \alpha\,T_{\rm KKB}\int_{M_7} d(\imath_\kappa N)$, with the completion $d(\imath_\kappa N) = e^{-2\tilde\Phi}\star d\tilde B_2 + \tfrac12\, \imath_\kappa C_4 \wedge \imath_\kappa F_5$; reducing this action on the internal space converts it into the topological symmetry operator $U_R^{(3)}$ of the SymTh. The supporting machinery is the 5d Symmetry Theory obtained from the consistent truncation of Type IIB supergravity on $T^{1,1}$, whose Chern-Simons terms fixed the anomaly coefficients, together with the T-duality chain and the tachyon-kink construction that fix the form of the non-BPS action. The worldvolume scalars $\rho_B$, $\rho_R$ implement the TQFT dressing that makes the operator gauge invariant and, for Neumann boundary conditions, non-invertible.

What would settle it

A direct string-theory computation of the non-BPS KK monopole couplings would settle the claim: if the coefficient of $\imath_\kappa C_4\wedge\imath_\kappa F_5$ in $d(\imath_\kappa N)$ is not $\tfrac12$ as in Eq. (4.13), or if the worldvolume scalars cannot be normalized to produce the Chern-Simons terms in Eq. (4.19), then the anomaly coefficients would shift away from $\kappa_R=\tfrac32 N^2$ and $\kappa_B=-2N^2$ and the proposed operator would not match field theory.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that a non-BPS KK monopole with Taub-NUT direction along the Reeb vector of the internal space is the holographic symmetry operator for the corresponding abelian isometry symmetry. In the Klebanov-Witten example, after reducing the non-BPS KK monopole worldvolume action on the $S^2\times S^2$ base of $T^{1,1}$, the surviving Wess-Zumino term is $S_{\rm WZ}^{\rm KKB} = \alpha \int_{M_3'}\bigl(g_R^{-2}\,\star dA_R - \frac{\kappa_B}{4\pi}(A_B+d\rho_B)\wedge dA_B - \frac{\kappa_R}{4\pi}(A_R+d\rho_R)\wedge dA_R\bigr)$, which is precisely the dressed topological operator $U_R^{(3)}$ of the 5d SymTh. The Chern-Simons terms carry the anomaly coefficients $\kappa_R = \frac{3}{2}N^2$ and $\kappa_B = -2N^2$, matching the field-theoretic 't Hooft anomalies of the R-symmetry and its mixed anomaly with the baryonic symmetry. The charged operators are gravitational waves propagating in the isometry direction, whose worldvolume action reduces to a Wilson line of $A_R$. With Neumann boundary conditions for the baryon gauge field, the R-symmetry operator becomes non-invertible, and the non-BPS KK monopole action reproduces the required TQFT dressing.

Load-bearing premise

The map rests on the assumption that a non-BPS KK monopole exists with exactly the worldvolume couplings written in Eqs. (2.10) and (4.13); dualities predict the object and its tachyon decay, but those precise couplings—including the $C_4$ and $F_5$ completion and the scalar normalizations—are posited by analogy and fixed by hand, so if any coefficient differs the brane-operator identification fails.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For any abelian isometry symmetry of a holographic background, the symmetry operator should be the corresponding non-BPS KK monopole wrapped on the internal cycles, linking with gravitational-wave Wilson lines as charged operators.
  • The R-symmetry operator of Klebanov-Witten is reproduced exactly, including the self-'t Hooft anomaly $\kappa_R=\frac{3}{2}N^2$ and mixed anomaly $\kappa_B=-2N^2$, so the brane construction is a valid holographic avatar of the SymTh operators.
  • When the baryonic symmetry is gauged (Neumann boundary condition for $A_B$), the R-symmetry operator becomes non-invertible and the worldvolume action of the non-BPS KK monopole accounts for the TQFT dressing.
  • The baryonic symmetry operator previously proposed as a non-BPS D4-brane acquires an additional $A_R\wedge dA_B$ coupling, so both symmetries' anomalies are captured in one consistent brane dictionary.
  • The complete brane-operator dictionary maps every topological and charged operator of the SymTh to a wrapped brane or gravitational wave, providing a systematic string-theory realization of continuous symmetry defects.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Inference: the same logic should extend to non-abelian isometry and R-symmetries, such as the $SU(2)\times SU(2)$ mesonic symmetry of Klebanov-Witten or the $SO(6)$ R-symmetry of $\mathcal{N}=4$ SYM; the paper explicitly leaves this open.
  • Inference: the match suggests the full 5d SymTFT for the two $U(1)$'s can be derived directly from the brane worldvolume actions, giving a microscopic derivation rather than a supergravity fit.
  • Inference: the construction could be tested in other Sasaki-Einstein duals, where the anomaly coefficients are known and the same non-BPS KK monopole action should reproduce the corresponding symmetry operators.
  • Inference: because the scalar normalizations in Eqs. (4.18) and (4.21) are fixed by hand, a future microscopic derivation of the non-BPS KK monopole couplings would confirm or shift the anomaly coefficients, and that check would discriminate the proposal.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes that non-BPS Kaluza-Klein monopoles provide the holographic symmetry operators for abelian symmetries associated with isometries of the dual background, and it applies this proposal to the U(1)_R superconformal R-symmetry of the Klebanov-Witten theory. After constructing the non-BPS KKB monopole worldvolume action by a duality chain and by analogy with Sen's non-BPS branes, the authors reduce that action on the S^2×S^2 base of T^{1,1} and obtain an operator that matches the topological symmetry operator U_R^{(3)} of the five-dimensional SymTh, including the Chern-Simons terms that encode the R-symmetry self-anomaly and the mixed R-baryonic anomaly. The paper also maps the baryonic symmetry operators, the dual magnetic operators, the charged Wilson and 't Hooft lines, and the gravitational-wave states to BPS and non-BPS branes, and it explains how a choice of boundary conditions makes the R-symmetry operator non-invertible after gauging the baryonic symmetry. The central claim is that Eq. (4.19), namely S_WZ^{KKB} = α ∫_{M_3'} (g_R^{-2} ⋆ dA_R - κ_B/(4π)(A_B+dρ_B)∧dA_B - κ_R/(4π)(A_R+dρ_R)∧dA_R), reproduces the expected symmetry operator and its anomalies.

Significance. If the proposal is correct, it substantially extends the brane realization of continuous symmetry operators from gauge-field symmetries to isometry symmetries, a class that had resisted the previous non-BPS brane construction. The paper is strong in its concreteness: the reductions use the actual supergravity equations of motion and the explicit T^{1,1} geometry of [45], and the final dictionary in Table 1 relates every SymTh operator to a specific brane configuration. The treatment of the non-invertible dressing through worldvolume scalars is also a useful and explicit realization of the SymTh construction. The main caveat, acknowledged in part by the authors, is that the non-BPS KKB action is posited rather than derived and that key normalizations are fixed for convenience; these inputs are load-bearing for the central anomaly match. With those inputs made explicit or independently justified, the framework would provide a falsifiable and checkable holographic description of R-symmetry operators.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 2 and Sec. 4.2, Eqs. (2.10) and (4.13)] The existence and exact worldvolume action of the non-BPS KK monopole is assumed rather than derived. The duality chain in Fig. 1 predicts the object's existence and its decay through a tachyon kink to a BPS KKB monopole, but it does not determine the tachyon WZ term in Eq. (2.10) or the RR completion term (1/2)(2π)^{-1} dω(2) ∧ i_κ F_5 in Eq. (4.13). These terms are posited by analogy with Sen's non-BPS D-branes. Since Eq. (4.19) is the central result, any modification of the coefficient of dω(2) ∧ i_κ F_5 would change the relative strengths of the kinetic term and the two anomaly terms in the final operator. I would ask the authors to derive this coefficient in a controlled limit, or to state explicitly that the proposal is a conjecture with a precise list of unproven input couplings.
  2. [Sec. 4.2, Eqs. (4.18) and (4.21)] The normalizations of the worldvolume scalars ρ_B, ρ_R and ρ'_R are fixed 'for later convenience' in Eqs. (4.18) and (4.21). These choices determine the relative coefficients of the terms in the final actions, Eqs. (4.19) and (4.22), and therefore the apparent reproduction of the SymTh operators and their anomaly coefficients is partly an input rather than an output. The paper should fix these normalizations by an independent requirement, for example by demanding a canonical kinetic term for the worldvolume two-form ω(2) or by deriving the reduction of the worldvolume theory from the BPS KKB action. Absent such a derivation, the claimed matching to U_R^{(3)} and to the 't Hooft line is a consistency check within a chosen normalization scheme, not a fully independent verification.
  3. [Sec. 3.1 and Sec. 4, Eqs. (3.18)-(3.20) and (4.19)] The anomaly coefficients κ_R and κ_B in Eq. (3.20) are not predicted by the brane worldvolume computation; they are read directly from the known five-dimensional reduction of [45] and then used as the target for the brane reduction. Since the same reduction and the same supergravity equations of motion are also used to evaluate the brane actions in Sec. 4, the final 'match' in Eq. (4.19) is a consistency check inside one framework rather than an independent derivation of the anomalies from the brane. The authors should clarify this status and, if possible, provide an independent determination of κ_R and κ_B from the brane worldvolume data alone.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract and Sec. 3.1, Eq. (3.20) versus Eq. (3.2)] The abstract says the anomalies are 'precisely reproduced,' but Eq. (3.20) gives κ_R = 3N^2/2 while the field-theoretic result in Eq. (3.2) is 3N^2/2 - 2. The text notes the large-N matching, but the wording should be adjusted to avoid implying an exact finite-N agreement.
  2. [Sec. 4.3, Table 1] For the operator V_B^{(2)}, the D4 brane wrapping S^3 alone gives Eq. (4.8), dA_B - (1/2)dA_R, so the NS2_R brane must cancel the dA_R term at a specific relative coefficient. This cancellation should be stated explicitly in the text, since Table 1 presents the combination as a single entry.
  3. [Sec. 2, footnote 6] The alternative proposals in refs. [24]-[26] are cited but not compared with the present construction. A few sentences describing the relation and the differences would help the reader assess the novelty and the overlap with those works.
  4. [Sec. 4.2, Eq. (4.13)] In Eq. (4.13), the coefficient 1/2 in front of (2π)^{-1} dω(2) ∧ i_κ F_5 and the signs in Eq. (4.14) should be checked against the gauge-invariance transformations listed after Eq. (4.12). As written, it is difficult for the reader to verify the consistency of those signs.
  5. [Throughout] There are a few typographical issues, such as 'latter convenience' in Eq. (4.18) for 'later convenience,' and some notation in Table 1 uses primes inconsistently (e.g., M_3' versus M_3). These are minor but should be cleaned up.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 5.0 of 10

Partial circularity: the worldvolume scalar normalizations in Eq. (4.18) are fixed "for latter convenience" so that Eq. (4.19) reproduces the known U_R^(3) operator, whose anomaly coefficients are themselves read from the same SUGRA reduction used to build the target.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Section 4.2, Eqs. (4.13), (4.18) and (4.19); compare Eqs. (3.20), (3.26) and (3.27)]
    "2π dω(2) = − 2/3 ( 2k/3 dρB ∧ Φ − k dρR ∧ J ) , (4.18) where we have fixed the normalization of the scalars ρB,R for latter convenience. Putting together all ingredients and using the dictionary in eq. (3.17), the action for the non-BPS KK monopole is S_WZ^KKB = α ∫_{M3'} ( g_R^{-2} ⋆ dA_R − κ_B/(4π) (A_B + dρ_B) ∧ dA_B − κ_R/(4π) (A_R + dρ_R) ∧ dA_R ) ."

    The target operator U_R^(3) in Eq. (3.27) contains exactly the terms −iα κ_B/(4π)(A_B+dρ_B)∧dA_B and −iα κ_R/(4π)(A_R+dρ_R)∧dA_R, with κ_B and κ_R already fixed in Eq. (3.20) from the known IIB reduction [45]. In the brane computation, the scalar normalizations in Eq. (4.18) are explicitly chosen "for latter convenience," i.e. to land on that target operator, and the RR completion in Eq. (4.13) that produces the κ-dependent terms is posited "by consistency" rather than derived from the T-duality chain. Thus the claimed reproduction of the anomaly Chern-Simons terms is partly an input: the scalar dressing is tuned to the known operator rather than independently predicted.

full rationale

The paper's central proposal, that non-BPS KK monopoles implement abelian isometry symmetries, is a conjecture whose existence is supported by a duality chain and whose worldvolume action is posited by analogy and consistency; an unproven ansatz is a correctness risk, not by itself circularity. The clearest circular element is in the R-symmetry matching: Eq. (4.18) fixes the normalization of the worldvolume scalars "for latter convenience," and Eq. (4.19) then reproduces the known U_R^(3) operator, including the anomaly terms, whose coefficients were already obtained from the same SUGRA reduction [45] used to define the SymTh target. This makes the scalar-dressing part of the "precise reproduction" constructed rather than derived. However, the anomaly coefficients κ_R and κ_B are not fitted to the brane action; they come from an external reduction, and several independent checks (GW charge quantization, D3 baryon R-charge, D4 baryon operator) give the central claim non-trivial content. There is no load-bearing self-citation: reference [15] is same-group work but the new KKB step is justified by the duality chain and by the external BPS KK monopole literature [27], and the SUGRA reduction [45] is external. The score of 5 reflects one genuine partially constructed matching while acknowledging the independent content in the rest of the brane-operator map.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 2 invented entities

The central derivation relies on one assumed object, the non-BPS KK monopole, and one hand-fixed normalization. All other inputs are standard dualities, the consistent truncation of [45], and known field theory anomaly coefficients. This is a small ledger for a theory paper, but the assumed entity carries most of the load.

free parameters (1)
  • Worldvolume scalar normalization coefficients in (4.18) and (4.21) = Coefficients 2k/3 and k in the 2 pi d omega^(2) expansions; later absorbed into alpha
    These coefficients are fixed by hand so that the brane WZ action reproduces the target SymTh operators, and they are not derived from an independent principle.
assumptions (4)
  • standard math Buscher T-duality rules and the type IIA equations of motion used to convert i_kappa N into * dA.
    These are standard string duality tools invoked throughout Section 2 but not re-derived in the paper.
  • domain assumption AdS/CFT dictionary mapping global symmetries to bulk gauge symmetries and isometries, including the identification of the R-symmetry current with the graviphoton A.
    This is the standard holographic dictionary cited from [1,34] and is used to identify the charged operators and symmetry operators.
  • domain assumption The 5D Kaluza-Klein reduction of [45] is a valid consistent truncation capturing the baryonic and R-symmetry gauge field sector.
    The entire SymTh action in Eq. (3.18) is taken from the existing reduction of Cassani and Faedo, including its Chern-Simons terms.
  • ad hoc to paper Existence and exact worldvolume action of non-BPS KK monopoles, as assumed in Eqs. (2.10) and (4.13).
    The duality chain predicts existence, but the precise tachyon WZ action and its RR completion are posited by analogy and carry the central claim.
invented entities (2)
  • Non-BPS KK monopole (KKA/KKB)
    purpose: Implements the symmetry operator for isometry and R-symmetry; in Klebanov-Witten it gives U_R^(3).
    Its existence follows from the duality chain in Fig. 1, but the exact worldvolume action is assumed and no external falsifiable prediction is made beyond matching the known SymTh operator.
  • Rigid non-BPS NS2 brane (NS2_R)
    purpose: Acts as the magnetic dual to the non-BPS gravitational wave and realizes the operator V_R^(2) measuring dA_R fluxes.
    The object is predicted by T-duality from non-BPS NS2 branes, but its action in Eqs. (2.17) and (4.23) is assumed without independent verification.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of R-symmetries, anomalies and non-invertible defects from non-BPS branes." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/BZQOVS23

@misc{pith2026250613859,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: R-symmetries, anomalies and non-invertible defects from non-BPS branes},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/BZQOVS23}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.13859}
}
abstract

We propose a holographic realization of symmetry operators for symmetries associated to isometries in terms of non-BPS Kaluza-Klein monopoles. Their existence is supported by dualities, and their action can be inferred by consistency with well-known String Theory constructions. We use our proposal to describe the $U(1)$ superconformal R-symmetry of the Klebanov-Witten 4d $\mathcal{N}=1$ theory dual to Type IIB String Theory on $AdS_5\times T^{1,1}$. We precisely reproduce the expectations from field theory, including the 't Hooft self-anomaly of the R-symmetry and the mixed 't Hooft anomaly with the baryonic symmetry. For a choice of boundary conditions, the R-symmetry becomes non-invertible and the worldvolume action for the non-BPS Kaluza-Klein monopole precisely accounts for this.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.13859 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Sequence of dualities predicting the boxed objects. Vertical arrows stand for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Sequence of dualities predicting the boxed objects. Vertical arrows stand for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Non-Abelian Symmetry Operators from Hanging Branes in $AdS_5 \times S^5$

    hep-th 2025-10 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    In AdS5×S5, non-Abelian SO(6) symmetry operators are realized by hanging D5-brane–KK-monopole bound states, matching the Gauss-law operators from the low-energy supergravity action.

  2. Continuous symmetries and charge measurement of boundary operators in holography

    hep-th 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Continuous symmetry operators in holography are U-shaped hanging brane bound states (D5-KK in Type IIB, M5-KK in M-theory) whose worldvolume couplings reproduce the Gauss-law symmetry operators and measure charges of ...

  3. Gravitational Background of Alice-Vortices and R7-Branes

    hep-th 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A family of asymptotic Alice-vortex/R7-brane backgrounds in axio-dilaton gravity is constructed, with the vortex tension encoded in a conical deficit and a generic intrinsic dipole moment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

57 extracted references · 13 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers

  1. [15]

    Bergman, E

    O. Bergman, E. Garcia-Valdecasas, F. Mignosa, and D. Rodriguez-Gomez, Non-BPS branes and continuous symmetries , JHEP 02 (2025) 066, [ arXiv:2407.00773]

    arXiv 2025

  2. [45]

    Cassani and A

    D. Cassani and A. F. Faedo, A Supersymmetric consistent truncation for conifold solutions, Nucl. Phys. B 843 (2011) 455–484, [ arXiv:1008.0883]

    arXiv 2011

  3. [1]

    Witten, Anti de Sitter space and holography , Adv

    E. Witten, Anti de Sitter space and holography , Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2 (1998) 253–291, [hep-th/9802150]

    arXiv 1998

  4. [2]

    D. S. Freed and C. Teleman, Relative quantum field theory , Commun. Math. Phys. 326 (2014) 459–476, [ arXiv:1212.1692]

    arXiv 2014

  5. [3]

    Gaiotto and J

    D. Gaiotto and J. Kulp, Orbifold groupoids, JHEP 02 (2021) 132, [arXiv:2008.05960]

    arXiv 2021

  6. [4]

    Apruzzi, F

    F. Apruzzi, F. Bonetti, I. n. Garc ´ ıa Etxebarria, S. S. Hosseini, and S. Schafer-Nameki, Symmetry TFTs from String Theory , Commun. Math. Phys. 402 (2023), no. 1 895–949, [ arXiv:2112.02092]. 24

    arXiv 2023

  7. [5]

    D. S. Freed, G. W. Moore, and C. Teleman, Topological symmetry in quantum field theory, arXiv:2209.07471

    arXiv

  8. [6]

    Apruzzi, F

    F. Apruzzi, F. Bedogna, and N. Dondi, SymTh for non-finite symmetries , arXiv:2402.14813

    arXiv

Show all 57 references
  1. [7]

    Bonetti, M

    F. Bonetti, M. Del Zotto, and R. Minasian, SymTFTs for Continuous non-Abelian Symmetries, arXiv:2402.12347

  2. [8]

    Higher symmetries, boundary conditions, and the di-baryon in the ABJM model

    O. Bergman, “ Higher symmetries, boundary conditions, and the di-baryon in the ABJM model .” talk given at Holography, Generalized Geometry and Duality, Mainz Institute for Theoretical Physics (May 2019), and at Challenges and Advances in Theoretical Physics, KIAS (May 2019)

    2019

  3. [9]

    Apruzzi, I

    F. Apruzzi, I. Bah, F. Bonetti, and S. Schafer-Nameki, Noninvertible Symmetries from Holography and Branes , Phys. Rev. Lett. 130 (2023), no. 12 121601, [arXiv:2208.07373]

    2023 arXiv

  4. [10]

    I. n. Garc ´ ıa Etxebarria,Branes and Non-Invertible Symmetries , Fortsch. Phys. 70 (2022), no. 11 2200154, [ arXiv:2208.07508]

    2022 arXiv

  5. [11]

    Bergman and S

    O. Bergman and S. Hirano, The holography of duality in N = 4 Super-Yang-Mills theory, JHEP 11 (2022) 069, [ arXiv:2208.09396]

    2022 arXiv

  6. [12]

    J. J. Heckman, M. H¨ ubner, E. Torres, and H. Y. Zhang, The Branes Behind Generalized Symmetry Operators, Fortsch. Phys. 71 (2023), no. 1 2200180, [arXiv:2209.03343]

    2023 arXiv

  7. [13]

    Apruzzi, F

    F. Apruzzi, F. Bonetti, D. S. W. Gould, and S. Schafer-Nameki, Aspects of categorical symmetries from branes: SymTFTs and generalized charges , SciPost Phys. 17 (2024), no. 1 025, [ arXiv:2306.16405]

    2024 arXiv

  8. [14]

    I. Bah, E. Leung, and T. Waddleton, Non-invertible symmetries, brane dynamics, and tachyon condensation , JHEP 01 (2024) 117, [ arXiv:2306.15783]

    2024 arXiv

  9. [16]

    Sen, SO(32) spinors of type I and other solitons on brane - anti-brane pair , JHEP 09 (1998) 023, [ hep-th/9808141]

    A. Sen, SO(32) spinors of type I and other solitons on brane - anti-brane pair , JHEP 09 (1998) 023, [ hep-th/9808141]

    1998 arXiv

  10. [17]

    Sen, Supersymmetric world volume action for nonBPS D-branes , JHEP 10 (1999) 008, [hep-th/9909062]

    A. Sen, Supersymmetric world volume action for nonBPS D-branes , JHEP 10 (1999) 008, [hep-th/9909062]

    1999 arXiv

  11. [18]

    Sen, NonBPS states and Branes in string theory , in Advanced School on Supersymmetry in the Theories of Fields, Strings and Branes , pp

    A. Sen, NonBPS states and Branes in string theory , in Advanced School on Supersymmetry in the Theories of Fields, Strings and Branes , pp. 187–234, 1, 1999. hep-th/9904207. 25

    1999 arXiv

  12. [19]

    Sen, Dirac-Born-Infeld action on the tachyon kink and vortex , Phys

    A. Sen, Dirac-Born-Infeld action on the tachyon kink and vortex , Phys. Rev. D 68 (2003) 066008, [ hep-th/0303057]

    2003 arXiv

  13. [20]

    Gutperle and A

    M. Gutperle and A. Strominger, Fluxbranes in string theory , JHEP 06 (2001) 035, [hep-th/0104136]

    2001 arXiv

  14. [21]

    Cvetiˇ c, J

    M. Cvetiˇ c, J. J. Heckman, M. H¨ ubner, and E. Torres,Fluxbranes, generalized symmetries, and Verlinde’s metastable monopole , Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024), no. 4 046007, [arXiv:2305.09665]

    2024 arXiv

  15. [22]

    Calvo, F

    H. Calvo, F. Mignosa, and D. Rodriguez-Gomez, Continuous symmetry defects and brane/anti-brane systems, arXiv:2503.04892

    arXiv

  16. [23]

    I. R. Klebanov and E. Witten, Superconformal field theory on three-branes at a Calabi-Yau singularity, Nucl. Phys. B 536 (1998) 199–218, [ hep-th/9807080]

    1998 arXiv

  17. [24]

    Lawrie, X

    C. Lawrie, X. Yu, and H. Y. Zhang, Intermediate defect groups, polarization pairs, and noninvertible duality defects , Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024), no. 2 026005, [arXiv:2306.11783]

    2024 arXiv

  18. [25]

    Waddleton, U (1)R-Symmetry Topological Operators from Branes in Holography, arXiv:2408.14542

    T. Waddleton, U (1)R-Symmetry Topological Operators from Branes in Holography, arXiv:2408.14542

    arXiv

  19. [26]

    Cvetiˇ c, J

    M. Cvetiˇ c, J. J. Heckman, M. H¨ ubner, and C. Murdia,Metric Isometries, Holography, and Continuous Symmetry Operators , arXiv:2501.17911

    arXiv

  20. [27]

    Eyras, B

    E. Eyras, B. Janssen, and Y. Lozano, Five-branes, K K monopoles and T duality , Nucl. Phys. B 531 (1998) 275–301, [ hep-th/9806169]

    1998 arXiv

  21. [28]

    I. n. Garc ´ ıa Etxebarria and N. Iqbal,A Goldstone theorem for continuous non-invertible symmetries , JHEP 09 (2023) 145, [ arXiv:2211.09570]

    2023 arXiv

  22. [29]

    Bergshoeff, I

    E. Bergshoeff, I. Entrop, and R. Kallosh, Exact duality in string effective action , Phys. Rev. D 49 (1994) 6663–6673, [ hep-th/9401025]

    1994 arXiv

  23. [30]

    Janssen and Y

    B. Janssen and Y. Lozano, On the dielectric effect for gravitational waves , Nucl. Phys. B 643 (2002) 399–430, [ hep-th/0205254]

    2002 arXiv

  24. [31]

    B. S. Acharya, J. M. Figueroa-O’Farrill, C. M. Hull, and B. J. Spence, Branes at conical singularities and holography , Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2 (1999) 1249–1286, [hep-th/9808014]

    1999 arXiv

  25. [32]

    D. R. Morrison and M. R. Plesser, Nonspherical horizons. 1. , Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 3 (1999) 1–81, [ hep-th/9810201]

    1999 arXiv

  26. [33]

    Benvenuti, S

    S. Benvenuti, S. Franco, A. Hanany, D. Martelli, and J. Sparks, An Infinite family of superconformal quiver gauge theories with Sasaki-Einstein duals , JHEP 06 (2005) 064, [hep-th/0411264]. 26

    2005 arXiv

  27. [34]

    Berenstein, C

    D. Berenstein, C. P. Herzog, and I. R. Klebanov, Baryon spectra and AdS /CFT correspondence, JHEP 06 (2002) 047, [ hep-th/0202150]

    2002 arXiv

  28. [35]

    Janssen and Y

    B. Janssen and Y. Lozano, A Microscopical description of giant gravitons , Nucl. Phys. B 658 (2003) 281–299, [ hep-th/0207199]

    2003 arXiv

  29. [36]

    Janssen, Y

    B. Janssen, Y. Lozano, and D. Rodriguez-Gomez, A Microscopical description of giant gravitons. 2. The AdS(5) x S**5 background , Nucl. Phys. B 669 (2003) 363–378, [hep-th/0303183]

    2003 arXiv

  30. [37]

    K. A. Intriligator, M. Kleban, and J. Kumar, Comments on unstable branes , JHEP 02 (2001) 023, [ hep-th/0101010]

    2001 arXiv

  31. [38]

    Eyras and Y

    E. Eyras and Y. Lozano, Brane actions and string dualities , Lect. Notes Phys. 525 (1999) 356, [ hep-th/9812225]

    1999 arXiv

  32. [39]

    S. S. Gubser and I. R. Klebanov, Baryons and domain walls in an N=1 superconformal gauge theory, Phys. Rev. D 58 (1998) 125025, [ hep-th/9808075]

    1998 arXiv

  33. [40]

    Y. Choi, H. T. Lam, and S.-H. Shao, Noninvertible Global Symmetries in the Standard Model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129 (2022), no. 16 161601, [ arXiv:2205.05086]

    2022 arXiv

  34. [41]

    Cordova and K

    C. Cordova and K. Ohmori, Noninvertible Chiral Symmetry and Exponential Hierarchies, Phys. Rev. X 13 (2023), no. 1 011034, [ arXiv:2205.06243]

    2023 arXiv

  35. [42]

    Karasik, On anomalies and gauging of U(1) non-invertible symmetries in 4d QED, SciPost Phys

    A. Karasik, On anomalies and gauging of U(1) non-invertible symmetries in 4d QED, SciPost Phys. 15 (2023), no. 1 002, [ arXiv:2211.05802]

    2023 arXiv

  36. [43]

    Roumpedakis, S

    K. Roumpedakis, S. Seifnashri, and S.-H. Shao, Higher Gauging and Non-invertible Condensation Defects, Commun. Math. Phys. 401 (2023), no. 3 3043–3107, [arXiv:2204.02407]

    2023 arXiv

  37. [44]

    Arbalestrier, R

    A. Arbalestrier, R. Argurio, and L. Tizzano, Noninvertible axial symmetry in QED comes full circle , Phys. Rev. D 110 (2024), no. 10 105012, [ arXiv:2405.06596]

    2024 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Benvenuti, L

    S. Benvenuti, L. A. Pando Zayas, and Y. Tachikawa, Triangle anomalies from Einstein manifolds , Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 10 (2006), no. 3 395–432, [hep-th/0601054]

    2006 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Benini, N

    F. Benini, N. Bobev, and P. M. Crichigno, Two-dimensional SCFTs from D3-branes , JHEP 07 (2016) 020, [ arXiv:1511.09462]

    2016 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Kaidi, K

    J. Kaidi, K. Ohmori, and Y. Zheng, Kramers-Wannier-like Duality Defects in (3+1)D Gauge Theories , Phys. Rev. Lett. 128 (2022), no. 11 111601, [arXiv:2111.01141]. 27

    2022 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Bergman and F

    O. Bergman and F. Mignosa, String theory and the SymTFT of 3d orthosymplectic Chern-Simons theory, JHEP 04 (2025) 047, [ arXiv:2412.00184]

    2025 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Seiberg, Five-dimensional SUSY field theories, nontrivial fixed points and string dynamics, Phys

    N. Seiberg, Five-dimensional SUSY field theories, nontrivial fixed points and string dynamics, Phys. Lett. B 388 (1996) 753–760, [ hep-th/9608111]

    1996 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Arbalestrier, R

    A. Arbalestrier, R. Argurio, and L. Tizzano, U(1) Gauging, Continuous TQFTs, and Higher Symmetry Structures , arXiv:2502.12997

    arXiv

  44. [52]

    Marolf and S

    D. Marolf and S. F. Ross, Boundary Conditions and New Dualities: Vector Fields in AdS/CFT, JHEP 11 (2006) 085, [ hep-th/0606113]

    2006 arXiv

  45. [53]

    A. Das, R. Gregory, and N. Iqbal, Higher-form symmetries, anomalous magnetohydrodynamics, and holography, SciPost Phys. 14 (2023), no. 6 163, [arXiv:2205.03619]

    2023 arXiv

  46. [54]

    DeWolfe and K

    O. DeWolfe and K. Higginbotham, Generalized symmetries and 2-groups via electromagnetic duality in AdS/CF T, Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021), no. 2 026011, [arXiv:2010.06594]

    2021 arXiv

  47. [55]

    J. A. Damia, R. Argurio, and E. Garcia-Valdecasas, Non-invertible defects in 5d, boundaries and holography, SciPost Phys. 14 (2023), no. 4 067, [ arXiv:2207.02831]

    2023 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Arean, D

    D. Arean, D. E. Crooks, and A. V. Ramallo, Supersymmetric probes on the conifold , JHEP 11 (2004) 035, [ hep-th/0408210]

    2004 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Antinucci and F

    A. Antinucci and F. Benini, Anomalies and gauging of U(1) symmetries , Phys. Rev. B 111 (2025), no. 2 024110, [ arXiv:2401.10165]. 28

    2025 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.