Scalar Triple-Heavy Tetraquark States With Quark Content $cc\bar{c}\bar{s}$

Jin-Yun Wu; Luo-Geng Tian; Ming-Qiu Huang; Yong-Jiang Xu; Yong-Lu Liu; Yuan Li

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 2 cited by

Scalar Triple-Heavy Tetraquark States With Quark Content $cc\bar{c}\bar{s}$

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read QCD sum rules predict scalar $cc\bar c\bar s$ tetraquark states near 5 GeV.

desk verdict A competent, standard QCD sum rule analysis of a previously unstudied flavor combination; the mass predictions are plausible and the paper deserves refereeing despite the usual threshold caveats. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.14527 v2 pith:F5Y76BJC submitted 2025-06-17 hep-ph

Yong-Jiang Xu , Luo-Geng Tian , Yuan Li , Jin-Yun Wu , Yong-Lu Liu , Ming-Qiu Huang This is my paper

classification hep-ph

keywords QCDsumrulestriple-heavytetraquarkexotichadroncharm-strangediquark-antidiquarketa_cD_smolecularstatemasspredictionpoleresidue

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks whether a hadron built from two charm quarks, a charm antiquark, and a strange antiquark can bind, and if so at what mass. Using the QCD sum rule method, it computes masses and current coupling constants for three scalar $0^+$ configurations of quark content $cc\bar c\bar s$: an $\eta_c D_s$ molecular state and two diquark-antidiquark compact tetraquarks. The central numbers are $m_M = 4.9392^{+0.0851}_{-0.0817}$ GeV for the molecular state and $m_{T_1} = 5.0774^{+0.0708}_{-0.0641}$ GeV, $m_{T_2} = 5.0679^{+0.0839}_{-0.0721}$ GeV for the compact states. If these predictions are right, they give concrete mass targets for exotic scalar triple-heavy tetraquarks, a sector with no observed candidate yet.

What carries the argument

The central object is the two-point correlation function $\Pi(p) = i\int d^4x\,e^{ipx}\langle 0|T[J(x)J^\dagger(0)]|0\rangle$ built from three interpolating currents: $J^M(x)=[\bar c_i i\gamma_5 c_i][\bar s_j i\gamma_5 c_j]$ for the $\eta_c D_s$ molecule, and $J^{T_1}(x)$, $J^{T_2}(x)$ with $\Gamma=\gamma_\mu,\sigma_{\mu\nu}$ in $\epsilon^{ijn}\epsilon^{kln}[c_i^T C\Gamma c_j][\bar c_k C\Gamma\bar s_l^T]$ for the compact diquark-antidiquark states. Matching the hadronic dispersion relation to the operator product expansion and applying a Borel transformation gives the Laplace sum rule $\lambda^2 e^{-m^2/M_B^2}=\int_{s_{\min}}^{s_0} ds\,\rho^{\mathrm{OPE}}(s)e^{-s/M_B^2}$, from which the mass follows as the ratio $m^2=[d/d(-1/M_B^2)\int_{s_{\min}}^{s_0} ds\,\rho(s)e^{-s/M_B^2}]/[\int_{s_{\min}}^{s_0} ds\,\rho(s)e^{-s/M_B^2}]$. The OPE spectral density $\rho(s)=\rho_0+\rho_3+\rho_4+\rho_5+\rho_7$, computed up to dimension 7, carries the quark-mass, quark-condensate, mixed-condensate, and gluon-condensate contributions that set the central values.

What would settle it

A lattice computation of the scalar $cc\bar c\bar s$ spectrum that finds no bound state below the $\eta_c D_s$ threshold, or an $\eta_c D_s$ scattering analysis showing no near-threshold pole near 4.94 GeV, would contradict the central prediction.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that QCD sum rules support the existence of scalar bound states with quark content $cc\bar c\bar s$, with masses near 5 GeV. For the $\eta_c D_s$ molecular interpolating current $J^M$, the mass sum rule yields $m_M = 4.9392^{+0.0851}_{-0.0817}$ GeV and pole residue $\lambda_M = 2.8857^{+0.5729}_{-0.4928}\times 10^{-2}$ GeV$^5$; for the axial-vector diquark current $J^{T_1}$, $m_{T_1} = 5.0774^{+0.0708}_{-0.0641}$ GeV and $\lambda_{T_1} = 1.0436^{+0.1862}_{-0.1573}\times 10^{-1}$ GeV$^5$; and for the tensor diquark current $J^{T_2}$, $m_{T_2} = 5.0679^{+0.0839}_{-0.0721}$ GeV and $\lambda_{T_2} = 2.0316^{+0.4119}_{-0.3119}\times 10^{-1}$ GeV$^5$. The values are extracted from the Borel-transformed two-point sum rule, with the ground state isolated by an effective threshold $s_0$ chosen around $(5.3\text{--}5.5$ GeV)$^2$ and a Borel window in which the pole contribution exceeds 40 percent. The closeness of the two compact-tetraquark masses is read as a sign that both diquark configurations could exist as genuine hadrons.

Load-bearing premise

The calculation assumes that the spectral integral up to a single effective threshold $s_0$ is dominated by the ground-state hadron and that quark-hadron duality holds there, even though for these states $s_0$ has no independent measurement and is fixed by stability criteria.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

If the masses are correct, a narrow scalar with quark content $cc\bar c\bar s$ should appear near 4.94 GeV in channels that couple to $\eta_c D_s$.
The compact tetraquark states at about 5.07--5.08 GeV sit roughly 130 MeV above the molecular candidate, so mass alone can distinguish the two internal configurations.
The molecular mass lies about 13 MeV below the $\eta_c D_s$ threshold, consistent with a weakly bound molecule.
The pole residues rank $J^{T_2}$ largest and $J^M$ smallest, indicating that the three currents couple to their states with different strengths in production and decay.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

A lattice calculation of the scalar $cc\bar c\bar s$ spectrum could check whether the near-threshold molecular candidate survives and would give an independent mass to compare with 4.94 GeV.
Because $m_{T_1}$ and $m_{T_2}$ are nearly degenerate, the spin-dependent interaction inside the diquarks appears small; a confirmed near-degeneracy would constrain models of diquark spin splitting.
Since the effective threshold $s_0$ is not fixed by any external measurement, the quoted uncertainties do not include a threshold-recalibration error; a future measured ground-state mass could be used to re-tune $s_0$ and sharpen the predictions.
Experimental searches in charmonium-plus-$D_s$ final states could scan the 4.9--5.1 GeV window, where the molecular and compact candidates are predicted.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Quick take: this is a competent, standard QCD sum rule analysis of a flavor combination nobody has calculated before—scalar cc̄c̄s—and it gives three clean mass predictions near 5 GeV. It will not reorganize the field, but it is a legitimate addition to the exotic hadron catalog and deserves a serious referee, not a desk reject.

What's new: the specific cc̄c̄s channel with three interpolating currents: the ηcDs molecular current and two diquark-antidiquark currents. Prior sum rule studies, including refs. [61] and [70], covered the general QQ̄Q̄q system, so the combination and the currents are genuinely new. The technical machinery is standard: Borel-transformed two-point functions, OPE through dimension 7, pole dominance and condensate suppression criteria. The spectral densities are printed in full in the appendix, which is more than many papers in this genre do. The stability windows look reasonable and the mass predictions are internally consistent.

Soft spots: the OPE is truncated at dimension 7 with no estimate of the dimension-6 four-quark condensate, and the long spectral densities are not cross-checked against an independent calculation. That is a limitation, but a typical one. More notably, the effective threshold s0 is chosen rather than measured, and the quoted asymmetric errors come from varying it by ±0.1–0.2 GeV together with parameter uncertainties. The mass is a function of s0, so the predictions are conditional on the threshold model. That is inherent to the method, but the paper could have been more explicit about the size of the s0-induced shift alone.

The biggest physical caveat, which the paper does not address: for the molecular current the quark-level threshold smin is about 15.3 GeV², while the physical ηcDs threshold is about 24.5 GeV². The Borel integral therefore picks up OPE strength in the region below the physical threshold, and the exponential weight actually favors that region. This is the same duality assumption used in essentially all multiquark sum rules, but the gap is large enough that a referee should ask for a sensitivity check or at least a discussion. Also, the conclusion says "possible bound states," yet T1 and T2 come out above the ηcDs threshold; they are more likely resonances or scattering states. That distinction is arguably important for phenomenology.

Bottom line: a solid, incremental sum rule study with a new flavor combination and concrete predictions. I would send it to a referee who can look at the OPE expressions and the threshold question. I would cite it if I worked on exotic hadron spectroscopy.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies scalar triple-heavy tetraquark states with quark content cc\bar c \bar s using QCD sum rules. It constructs three interpolating currents: a color-singlet \eta_c D_s molecular current J^M and two diquark-antidiquark currents J^{T1} and J^{T2} with Γ = γ_μ and Γ = σ_{μν}, respectively. The two-point correlation functions are computed at the quark-gluon level through an operator product expansion truncated at dimension 7, and the spectral densities are listed in Appendix A. After Borel transformation and quark-hadron duality with a single effective threshold s_0, the paper derives mass and pole-residue sum rules, Eq. (2.14) and Eq. (2.15). The numerical analysis selects Borel windows and s_0 values by requiring pole dominance and condensate suppression, and reports masses m_M = 4.9392^{+0.0851}_{-0.0817} GeV, m_{T1} = 5.0774^{+0.0708}_{-0.0641} GeV, and m_{T2} = 5.0679^{+0.0839}_{-0.0721} GeV, together with the corresponding pole residues. The paper concludes that scalar bound states with this quark content are possible.

Significance. If the predictions are reliable, this is the first QCD sum rule study of scalar cc\bar c\bar s tetraquarks and it gives concrete mass targets near 5 GeV for future experimental searches. The paper is a standard application of the established sum-rule formalism, with explicit interpolating currents, explicit but unverified spectral densities, and a clearly stated stability criterion (pole contribution above 40%, perturbative term dominance, condensate suppression). I give credit for the absence of self-citation or data fitting: the central values are outputs of the sum rule rather than inputs. However, the predictive power is conditional on two choices that are not fully quantified: the effective threshold s_0 and the truncation of the OPE at dimension 7 without an estimate of the omitted dimension-6 four-quark condensate. These points affect the central claim directly, so the paper needs revision before the mass predictions can be taken at face value.

major comments (3)

[Section 3, Eq. (2.15)] The mass in Eq. (2.15) is a ratio of Borel-weighted integrals of the OPE spectral density cut at s_0, so the central value inherits the choice of s_0. The paper tests three close values, (5.3, 5.4, 5.5) GeV squared for J^M and (5.5) GeV squared for the compact currents, but the quoted asymmetric errors combine s_0 variation with quark-mass and condensate variations in an unspecified way. The stability criterion RP > 40% constrains the Borel window, not the value of s_0. I request a separate quantitative estimate of the mass shift induced by a wider, physically motivated variation of s_0 (for example, from just above the ground state to the first excited-state threshold), reported as a distinct systematic uncertainty.
[Appendix A, Eq. (A.1)] The OPE is truncated at dimension 7, and the paper includes ⟨\bar ss⟩ (dimension 3), ⟨g_s^2 GG⟩ (dimension 4), ⟨g_s \bar s σ G s⟩ (dimension 5), and ⟨\bar ss⟩⟨g_s^2 GG⟩ (dimension 7). No dimension-6 four-quark condensate terms (such as ⟨\bar ss⟩^2-type contributions) appear, and no estimate or argument is given for their numerical smallness. In tetraquark sum rules this class of condensate is often numerically important, and the stability criterion in Sec. 3 only checks the condensates that were actually included. Please estimate the omitted dimension-6 contribution or justify the truncation explicitly.
[Section 2, Eqs. (2.5)-(2.14)] The quark-hadron duality ansatz ρ_phys(s) = ρ_OPE(s) θ(s − s_0) is applied with lower integration limit s_min = (3m_c + m_s)^2 ≈ 15.3 GeV^2. For the η_c D_s molecular current, the physical two-meson threshold is (m_{η_c}+m_{D_s})^2 ≈ 24.5 GeV^2, so the OPE spectral density in the interval between these two scales has no direct hadronic counterpart below the pole. This is a standard assumption in sum rules, but because the paper claims a new prediction for an unobserved state, the magnitude of the resulting systematic should be discussed and, if possible, quantified, for example by comparing moments with different lower limits or with a simple model spectral function.

minor comments (5)

[General] The conclusion would be strengthened by a direct comparison with the existing model predictions cited in Refs. [60-72], which is currently absent.
[Figure captions] The captions of Figs. 1-3 say 'at three different s0 values showed in the figures'; 'showed' should be 'shown'.
[Table 1] In the table caption, 'triple-Heavy' should be 'triple-heavy'.
[Section 4] The sentence 'there is possible of scalar bound states' is ungrammatical and should be rephrased, e.g., 'scalar bound states are possible'.
[Equations (A.2)-(A.18)] The spectral densities are long and are given without derivation or an external cross-check; stating how they were obtained (e.g., by which computational tool or manual calculation) would aid reproducibility.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the mass predictions are nontrivial outputs of the OPE sum rule, not re-statements of the chosen threshold or of fitted data.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained: the paper constructs currents in Eqs. (2.1)-(2.3), computes the OPE side of the two-point functions using the quark propagators (2.7)-(2.8), obtains the spectral densities in Appendix A, applies the Borel transformation (2.11), imposes quark-hadron duality (2.13), and then derives the mass formula (2.15) as a ratio of Borel-weighted integrals of rho_OPE(s). The effective threshold s0 enters only as an integration cutoff, and Section 3 explicitly varies it over (5.3 GeV)^2 to (5.5 GeV)^2; the resulting spread is part of the quoted uncertainty rather than a hidden re-injection of the output mass. The stability criteria (pole contribution above 40%, condensate suppression) are standard QCD sum rule validity checks, not fits of the mass to external data. No load-bearing self-citation appears in the argument: earlier work on triply heavy tetraquarks is cited for context or comparison, not to define the mass sum rule. The predictions are model-dependent in the usual QCD sum rule sense, especially through the quark-hadron duality ansatz and single-resonance saturation, but that is a physical modeling assumption and not a circular reduction of the result to its inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The three states are hypothetical outputs; the paper introduces no new fields, forces, or conserved quantities. Its assumptions are the standard set of QCD sum rule postulates listed above.

free parameters (2)

Effective threshold s0 = (5.3 GeV)² to (5.5 GeV)² depending on channel
Chosen in Sec. 3 so that pole contribution exceeds 40 percent and condensate terms stay small; Eq. (2.14) integrates OPE spectral density up to s0, so all extracted masses and couplings depend on it.
Borel mass window M_B² = [2.8,3.6] GeV² for J^M, [3.0,3.6] GeV² for J^T1, [2.6,3.5] GeV² for J^T2
Adjusted to make the mass curves flat; the reported values are the averages over these intervals, so the windows act as tuning parameters.

assumptions (5)

domain assumption Quark-hadron duality: ρ_phys(s) = ρ_OPE(s) θ(s - s0)
Used in Eq. (2.13) to equate the hadronic spectral function to the OPE spectral density above the threshold; this is the standard but unproven bridge between the two sides of the sum rule.
domain assumption Ground state pole dominance: the ground state saturates the sum rule in the chosen window
In Sec. 2, the physical side is written as a single pole plus continuum, Eq. (2.5), and the extraction of m assumes this pole is cleanly isolated in the Borel window.
domain assumption OPE truncation at dimension 7 with no dimension-6 four-quark condensate
Appendix A lists only ρ0, ρ3, ρ4, ρ5, ρ7; no dimension-6 contribution is derived or estimated, and no justification is given for omitting it.
domain assumption The interpolating current J^M predominantly couples to an η_c D_s molecular state rather than to a compact tetraquark
The Fock-space interpretation of J^M is stated in Sec. 2; a QCD sum rule current with the same quantum numbers couples to any scalar state with these quarks, so the molecular identification is an assumption.
standard math CΓ must be symmetric in the diquark currents
Argued in Sec. 2 from ε^{ijn}[c_i^T CΓ c_j] = ε^{ijn}[(CΓ)^T c_i^T c_j]; this restricts Γ to γ_μ and σ_{μν}, standard for antisymmetric diquarks.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Scalar Triple-Heavy Tetraquark States With Quark Content $cc\bar{c}\bar{s}$." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/F5Y76BJC

@misc{pith2026250614527,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Scalar Triple-Heavy Tetraquark States With Quark Content $cc\barc\bars$},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/F5Y76BJC}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.14527}
}

abstract

In this paper, we study the scalar triple-heavy tetraquark states with quark content $cc\bar{c}\bar{s}$, $\eta_{c}D_{s}$ molecular state and $[cc]_{A(T)}[\bar{c}\bar{s}]_{A(T)}$ compact tetraquark states, by the QCD sum rule method. First, we construct the needed interpolating currents, $J^{M}(x)$, $J^{T_{1}}(x)$, and $J^{T_{2}}(x)$. Then, we derive the sum rules for the masses and the current coupling constants. Finally, we numerically analyze these sum rules, and find $m_{M}=4.9392^{+0.0851}_{-0.0817}~\mbox{GeV}$, and $\lambda_{M}=2.8857^{+0.5729}_{-0.4928}\times10^{-2}~\mbox{GeV}^{5}$ for the mass and the current coupling constant of the $\eta_{c}D_{s}$ molecular state, $m_{T_{1}}=5.0774^{+0.0708}_{-0.0641}~\mbox{GeV}$, and $\lambda_{T_{1}}=1.0436^{+0.1862}_{-0.1573}\times10^{-1}~\mbox{GeV}^{5}$ for the mass and the current coupling constant of the $[cc]_{A}[\bar{c}\bar{s}]_{A}$ compact tetraquark state, $m_{T_{2}}=5.0679^{+0.0839}_{-0.0721}~\mbox{GeV}$, and $\lambda_{T_{2}}=2.0316^{+0.4119}_{-0.3119}\times10^{-1}~\mbox{GeV}^{5}$ for the mass and the current coupling constant of the $[cc]_{T}[\bar{c}\bar{s}]_{T}$ compact tetraquark state.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

Systematic exploration of triply heavy tetraquarks: spectroscopic and decay characteristics
hep-ph 2026-03 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

Triply heavy tetraquarks cc¯c¯q and bb¯b¯q are compact, unstable states with ground masses 5.2–5.5 GeV and 15.0–15.3 GeV; narrow resonances arise from amplitude cancellation and should appear in J/ψDs*/ηcDs and ΥB* channels.
Triply heavy tetraquarks $\bar{b}c\bar{q}c$ and $\bar{c}b\bar{q}b$ in a constituent quark model
hep-ph 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

A constituent quark model predicts dozens of narrow tetraquark resonances in the mixed beauty-charm systems \bar{b}c\bar{q}c and \bar{c}b\bar{q}b.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

84 extracted references · 21 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

[61]

Jiang, W

J.-F. Jiang, W. Chen and S.-L. Zhu, Triply heavy QQ ¯Q¯q tetraquark states, Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 094022 [ 1708.00142]

arXiv 2017
[70]

Zhang and L

W.-S. Zhang and L. Tang, Investigating triply heavy tetraquark states through QCD sum rules, 2412.11531

arXiv
[1]

Particle Data Groupcollaboration, Review of particle physics , Phys. Rev. D 110 (2024) 030001

2024
[2]

Belle collaboration, Observation of a narrow charmonium-like state in exclusive B± → K ±π+π−J/ψ decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 (2003) 262001 [ hep-ex/0309032]

arXiv 2003
[3]

Liu, An overview of XY Znew particles, Chin

X. Liu, An overview of XY Znew particles, Chin. Sci. Bull. 59 (2014) 3815 [ 1312.7408]

arXiv 2014
[4]

Hosaka, T

A. Hosaka, T. Iijima, K. Miyabayashi, Y. Sakai and S. Yasui, Exotic hadrons with heavy flavors: X, Y, Z, and related states , PTEP 2016 (2016) 062C01 [ 1603.09229]

arXiv 2016
[5]

H.-X. Chen, W. Chen, X. Liu and S.-L. Zhu, The hidden-charm pentaquark and tetraquark states, Phys. Rept. 639 (2016) 1 [ 1601.02092]

arXiv 2016
[6]

Richard, Exotic hadrons: review and perspectives , Few Body Syst

J.-M. Richard, Exotic hadrons: review and perspectives , Few Body Syst. 57 (2016) 1185 [1606.08593]

arXiv 2016

Show all 84 references

[7]

Lebed, R.E

R.F. Lebed, R.E. Mitchell and E.S. Swanson, Heavy-Quark QCD Exotica , Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 93 (2017) 143 [ 1610.04528]

2017 arXiv
[8]

F.-K. Guo, C. Hanhart, U.-G. Meißner, Q. Wang, Q. Zhao and B.-S. Zou, Hadronic molecules, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90 (2018) 015004 [ 1705.00141]

2018 arXiv
[9]

Liu, H.-X

Y.-R. Liu, H.-X. Chen, W. Chen, X. Liu and S.-L. Zhu, Pentaquark and Tetraquark states , Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 107 (2019) 237 [ 1903.11976]. – 15 –

2019 arXiv
[10]

Brambilla, S

N. Brambilla, S. Eidelman, C. Hanhart, A. Nefediev, C.-P. Shen, C.E. Thomas et al., The XY Zstates: experimental and theoretical status and perspectives , Phys. Rept. 873 (2020) 1 [1907.07583]

2020 arXiv
[11]

H.-X. Chen, W. Chen, X. Liu, Y.-R. Liu and S.-L. Zhu, An updated review of the new hadron states, Rept. Prog. Phys. 86 (2023) 026201 [ 2204.02649]

2023 arXiv
[12]

Wang, Review of the QCD sum rules for exotic states , 2502.11351

Z.-G. Wang, Review of the QCD sum rules for exotic states , 2502.11351

arXiv
[13]

Gomshi Nobary, Fragmentation production of Omega(ccc) and Omega(bbb) baryons , Phys

M.A. Gomshi Nobary, Fragmentation production of Omega(ccc) and Omega(bbb) baryons , Phys. Lett. B 559 (2003) 239 [ hep-ph/0408122]

2003 arXiv
[14]

Gomshi Nobary and R

M.A. Gomshi Nobary and R. Sepahvand, Fragmentation of triply heavy baryons , Phys. Rev. D 71 (2005) 034024 [ hep-ph/0406148]

2005 arXiv
[15]

Brambilla, A

N. Brambilla, A. Vairo and T. Rosch, Effective field theory Lagrangians for baryons with two and three heavy quarks , Phys. Rev. D 72 (2005) 034021 [ hep-ph/0506065]

2005 arXiv
[16]

Gomshi Nobary and R

M.A. Gomshi Nobary and R. Sepahvand, An Ivestigation of triply heavy baryon production at hadron colliders, Nucl. Phys. B 741 (2006) 34 [ hep-ph/0508115]

2006 arXiv
[17]

Jia, Variational study of weakly coupled triply heavy baryons , JHEP 10 (2006) 073 [hep-ph/0607290]

Y. Jia, Variational study of weakly coupled triply heavy baryons , JHEP 10 (2006) 073 [hep-ph/0607290]

2006 arXiv
[18]

Gomshi Nobary, B

M.A. Gomshi Nobary, B. Nikoobakht and J. Naji, Production of Omega(bbc) and Omega(bcc) baryons in quark diquark model , Nucl. Phys. A 789 (2007) 243

2007
[19]

Martynenko, Ground-state triply and doubly heavy baryons in a relativistic three-quark model, Phys

A.P. Martynenko, Ground-state triply and doubly heavy baryons in a relativistic three-quark model, Phys. Lett. B 663 (2008) 317 [ 0708.2033]

2008 arXiv
[20]

Patel, A

B. Patel, A. Majethiya and P.C. Vinodkumar, Masses and Magnetic moments of Triply Heavy Flavour Baryons in Hypercentral Model , Pramana 72 (2009) 679 [ 0808.2880]

2009 arXiv
[21]

Meinel, Prediction of the Omegabbb mass from lattice QCD , Phys

S. Meinel, Prediction of the Omegabbb mass from lattice QCD , Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 114514 [1008.3154]

2010 arXiv
[22]

Chen and S.-Z

Y.-Q. Chen and S.-Z. Wu, Production of Triply Heavy Baryons at LHC , JHEP 08 (2011) 144 [1106.0193]

2011 arXiv
[23]

Flynn, E

J.M. Flynn, E. Hernandez and J. Nieves, Triply Heavy Baryons and Heavy Quark Spin Symmetry, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 014012 [ 1110.2962]

2012 arXiv
[24]

Llanes-Estrada, O.I

F.J. Llanes-Estrada, O.I. Pavlova and R. Williams, A First Estimate of Triply Heavy Baryon Masses from the pNRQCD Perturbative Static Potential , Eur. Phys. J. C 72 (2012) 2019 [1111.7087]

2012 arXiv
[25]

Wang, Analysis of the Triply Heavy Baryon States with QCD Sum Rules , Commun

Z.-G. Wang, Analysis of the Triply Heavy Baryon States with QCD Sum Rules , Commun. Theor. Phys. 58 (2012) 723 [ 1112.2274]

2012 arXiv
[26]

Albertus, J.M

C. Albertus, J.M. Flynn, E. Hernandez and J. Nieves, A nonrelativistic quark model evaluation of exclusive b → c semileptonic decay of triply heavy baryons and c → s, d semileptonic decay of cb baryons, PoS ConfinementX (2012) 146 [ 1301.3024]

2012 arXiv
[27]

Meinel, Excited-state spectroscopy of triply-bottom baryons from lattice QCD , Phys

S. Meinel, Excited-state spectroscopy of triply-bottom baryons from lattice QCD , Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 114510 [ 1202.1312]

2012 arXiv
[28]

Aliev, K

T.M. Aliev, K. Azizi and M. Savci, Masses and Residues of the Triply Heavy Spin-1/2 Baryons, JHEP 04 (2013) 042 [ 1212.6065]. – 16 –

2013 arXiv
[29]

Padmanath, R.G

M. Padmanath, R.G. Edwards, N. Mathur and M. Peardon, Spectroscopy of triply-charmed baryons from lattice QCD , Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 074504 [ 1307.7022]

2014 arXiv
[30]

Aliev, K

T.M. Aliev, K. Azizi and M. Savcı, Properties of triply heavy spin-3/2 baryons , J. Phys. G 41 (2014) 065003 [ 1404.2091]

2014 arXiv
[31]

K.-W. Wei, B. Chen and X.-H. Guo, Masses of doubly and triply charmed baryons , Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015) 076008 [ 1503.05184]

2015 arXiv
[32]

K.-W. Wei, B. Chen, N. Liu, Q.-Q. Wang and X.-H. Guo, Spectroscopy of singly, doubly, and triply bottom baryons , Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017) 116005 [ 1609.02512]

2017 arXiv
[33]

Shah and A.K

Z. Shah and A.K. Rai, Masses and Regge trajectories of triply heavy Ωccc and Ωbbb baryons, Eur. Phys. J. A 53 (2017) 195

2017
[34]

Wang and J

W. Wang and J. Xu, Weak Decays of Triply Heavy Baryons , Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 093007 [1803.01476]

2018 arXiv
[35]

Shah and A.K

Z. Shah and A.K. Rai, Ground and Excited State Masses of the Ωbbc Baryon, Few Body Syst. 59 (2018) 76

2018
[36]

G. Yang, J. Ping, P.G. Ortega and J. Segovia, Triply heavy baryons in the constituent quark model, Chin. Phys. C 44 (2020) 023102 [ 1904.10166]

2020 arXiv
[37]

Wang, Triply-charmed dibaryon states or two-baryon scattering states from QCD sum rules, Phys

Z.-G. Wang, Triply-charmed dibaryon states or two-baryon scattering states from QCD sum rules, Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) 034008 [ 1912.07230]

2020 arXiv
[38]

Liu, Q.-F

M.-S. Liu, Q.-F. L¨ u and X.-H. Zhong, Triply charmed and bottom baryons in a constituent quark model, Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 074031 [ 1912.11805]

2020 arXiv
[39]

Alomayrah and T

N. Alomayrah and T. Barakat, The excited states of triply-heavy baryons in QCD sum rules , Eur. Phys. J. A 56 (2020) 76

2020
[40]

Wang, Analysis of the triply-heavy baryon states with the QCD sum rules , AAPPS Bull

Z.-G. Wang, Analysis of the triply-heavy baryon states with the QCD sum rules , AAPPS Bull. 31 (2021) 5 [ 2010.08939]

2021 arXiv
[41]

Wu, Y.-S

R.-H. Wu, Y.-S. Zuo, C. Meng, Y.-Q. Ma and K.-T. Chao, NLO effects for Ω QQQ baryons in QCD Sum Rules , Chin. Phys. C 45 (2021) 093103 [ 2104.07384]

2021 arXiv
[42]

Mutuk and U

H. Mutuk and U. ¨Ozdem, Magnetic moments of spin–1/2 triply heavy baryons: a study of light-cone QCD and quark–diquark model , Eur. Phys. J. Plus 137 (2022) 508 [ 2107.04361]

2022 arXiv
[43]

Huang, J

F. Huang, J. Xu and X.-R. Zhang, Deciphering weak decays of triply heavy baryons by SU(3) analysis, Eur. Phys. J. C 81 (2021) 976 [ 2107.13958]

2021 arXiv
[44]

Faustov and V.O

R.N. Faustov and V.O. Galkin, Triply heavy baryon spectroscopy in the relativistic quark model, Phys. Rev. D 105 (2022) 014013 [ 2111.07702]

2022 arXiv
[45]

Wang and Z.-P

W. Wang and Z.-P. Xing, Weak decays of triply heavy baryons in light front approach , Phys. Lett. B 834 (2022) 137402 [ 2203.14446]

2022 arXiv
[46]

Zhao, F.-W

Z.-X. Zhao, F.-W. Zhang and Q. Yang, Weak decays of triply heavy baryons , Eur. Phys. J. C 85 (2025) 106 [ 2204.00759]

2025 arXiv
[47]

Li, L.-C

J.-B. Li, L.-C. Gui, W. Qin, W. Sun and J. Liang, Triply charmed baryons mass decomposition from lattice QCD*, Chin. Phys. C 49 (2025) 063103 [ 2211.04713]

2025 arXiv
[48]

S.-Z. Wu, P. Wu and Y.-W. Li, Production of the triply heavy Ωccc and Ωbbb baryons at e+e− colliders, 2211.17061. – 17 –

arXiv
[49]

Zhao, C.-M

Y.-C. Zhao, C.-M. Tang and L. Tang, Mass predictions of triply heavy hybrid baryons via QCD sum rules , Eur. Phys. J. C 83 (2023) 654 [ 2303.15173]

2023 arXiv
[50]

Oudichhya, K

J. Oudichhya, K. Gandhi and A.k. Rai, Investigation of Ωccb and Ωcbb baryons in Regge phenomenology, Pramana 97 (2023) 151 [ 2304.05110]

2023 arXiv
[51]

Zhao and S

J. Zhao and S. Shi, Triply heavy baryons QQQ in vacuum and in a hot QCD medium , Phys. Rev. C 109 (2024) 024901 [ 2311.04594]

2024 arXiv
[52]

Najjar, K

Z.R. Najjar, K. Azizi and H.R. Moshfegh, Properties of the ground and excited states of triply heavy spin-1/2 baryons , Eur. Phys. J. C 84 (2024) 612 [ 2402.14348]

2024 arXiv
[53]

de Arenaza, J.J

N.M. de Arenaza, J.J. G´ alvez-Viruet and F.J. Llanes-Estrada, Triply-heavy/strange baryons with Cornell potential on a quantum computer , Eur. Phys. J. A 60 (2024) 216 [ 2407.07232]

2024 arXiv
[54]

J.-Q. Xie, H. Song and J.-K. Chen, Regge trajectories for the triply heavy bottom-charm baryons in the diquark picture , Eur. Phys. J. C 84 (2024) 1048 [ 2407.18280]

2024 arXiv
[55]

Najjar, K

Z.R. Najjar, K. Azizi and H.R. Moshfegh, Semileptonic decay of the triply heavy Ωccb to the observed Ξcc++ state, Phys. Rev. D 111 (2025) 014016 [ 2410.01602]

2025 arXiv
[56]

Dhindsa, D

N.S. Dhindsa, D. Chakraborty, A. Radhakrishnan, N. Mathur and M. Padmanath, Precise study of triply charmed baryons ( Ωccc), 2411.12729
[57]

Yu, Z.-Y

G.-L. Yu, Z.-Y. Li, Z.-G. Wang and Z. Zhou, Systematic analysis of the mass spectra of triply heavy baryons, Eur. Phys. J. C 85 (2025) 543 [ 2501.01803]

2025 arXiv
[58]

Salehi, A novel approach for spectroscopic study of Ωbbc baryon in the hypercentral constituent Quark model , Mod

N. Salehi, A novel approach for spectroscopic study of Ωbbc baryon in the hypercentral constituent Quark model , Mod. Phys. Lett. A 40 (2025) 2450220

2025
[59]

Najjar and K

Z.R. Najjar and K. Azizi, Investigation of triply heavy spin-3/2 baryons in their ground and excited states, 2504.06822
[60]

K. Chen, X. Liu, J. Wu, Y.-R. Liu and S.-L. Zhu, Triply heavy tetraquark states with the QQ ¯Q¯q configuration, Eur. Phys. J. A 53 (2017) 5 [ 1609.06117]

2017 arXiv
[62]

Liu, M.A

Y. Liu, M.A. Nowak and I. Zahed, Heavy Holographic Exotics: Tetraquarks as Efimov States , Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 126023 [ 1904.05189]

2019 arXiv
[63]

Xing, Weak decays of triply heavy tetraquarks b¯cb¯q, Eur

Y. Xing, Weak decays of triply heavy tetraquarks b¯cb¯q, Eur. Phys. J. C 80 (2020) 57 [1910.11593]

2020 arXiv
[64]

Weng, W.-Z

X.-Z. Weng, W.-Z. Deng and S.-L. Zhu, Triply heavy tetraquark states , Phys. Rev. D 105 (2022) 034026 [ 2109.05243]

2022 arXiv
[65]

L¨ u, D.-Y

Q.-F. L¨ u, D.-Y. Chen, Y.-B. Dong and E. Santopinto, Triply-heavy tetraquarks in an extended relativized quark model , Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021) 054026 [ 2107.13930]

2021 arXiv
[66]

X. Liu, Y. Tan, D. Chen, H. Huang and J. Ping, Possible triply heavy tetraquark states in a chiral quark model , Phys. Rev. D 107 (2023) 054019 [ 2205.08281]

2023 arXiv
[67]

Mutuk, Flavor exotic triply-heavy tetraquark states in AdS/QCD potential , Eur

H. Mutuk, Flavor exotic triply-heavy tetraquark states in AdS/QCD potential , Eur. Phys. J. C 83 (2023) 358 [ 2305.03358]

2023 arXiv
[68]

Zhu, W.-X

Z.-H. Zhu, W.-X. Zhang and D. Jia, Triply heavy tetraquark states: masses and other properties, Eur. Phys. J. C 84 (2024) 344 [ 2312.01908]. – 18 –

2024 arXiv
[69]

G. Yang, J. Ping and J. Segovia, Triply charm and bottom tetraquarks in a constituent quark model, Phys. Rev. D 110 (2024) 054036 [ 2407.14548]

2024 arXiv
[71]

Li, Y.-R

S.-Y. Li, Y.-R. Liu, Z.-L. Man, C.-R. Shu, Z.-G. Si and J. Wu, Triply Heavy Tetraquark States in a Mass-Splitting Model , Symmetry 17 (2025) 170 [ 2501.16105]

2025 arXiv
[72]

Galkin and E.M

V.O. Galkin and E.M. Savchenko, Masses of Ground States of Triply Heavy Tetraquarks , Phys. Part. Nucl. 56 (2025) 330

2025
[73]

F.-K. Guo, C. Hidalgo-Duque, J. Nieves and M.P. Valderrama, Heavy-antiquark–diquark symmetry and heavy hadron molecules: Are there triply heavy pentaquarks? , Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 054014 [ 1305.4052]

2013 arXiv
[74]

R. Chen, A. Hosaka and X. Liu, Prediction of triple-charm molecular pentaquarks , Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 114030 [ 1711.09579]

2017 arXiv
[75]

Wang, Analysis of the triply-charmed pentaquark states with QCD sum rules , Eur

Z.-G. Wang, Analysis of the triply-charmed pentaquark states with QCD sum rules , Eur. Phys. J. C 78 (2018) 300 [ 1801.08419]

2018 arXiv
[76]

Li, Y.-R

S.-Y. Li, Y.-R. Liu, Y.-N. Liu, Z.-G. Si and J. Wu, Pentaquark states with the QQQq ¯q configuration in a simple model , Eur. Phys. J. C 79 (2019) 87 [ 1809.08072]

2019 arXiv
[77]

F.-L. Wang, R. Chen, Z.-W. Liu and X. Liu, Possible triple-charm molecular pentaquarks from ΞccD1/ΞccD∗ 2 interactions, Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 054021 [ 1901.01542]

2019 arXiv
[78]

An, Q.-S

H.-T. An, Q.-S. Zhou, Z.-W. Liu, Y.-R. Liu and X. Liu, Exotic pentaquark states with the qqQQ ¯Q configuration, Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 056004 [ 1905.07858]

2019 arXiv
[79]

Wang, C.-W

Z.-Y. Wang, C.-W. Xiao, Z.-F. Sun and X. Liu, Possible molecules of triple-heavy pentaquarks within the extended local hidden gauge formalism , Phys. Rev. D 110 (2024) 076014 [2407.13319]

2024 arXiv
[80]

Shifman, A.I

M.A. Shifman, A.I. Vainshtein and V.I. Zakharov, QCD and Resonance Physics. Theoretical Foundations, Nucl. Phys. B 147 (1979) 385

1979
[81]

Shifman, A.I

M.A. Shifman, A.I. Vainshtein and V.I. Zakharov, QCD and Resonance Physics: Applications, Nucl. Phys. B 147 (1979) 448

1979
[82]

Reinders, H

L.J. Reinders, H. Rubinstein and S. Yazaki, Hadron Properties from QCD Sum Rules , Phys. Rept. 127 (1985) 1

1985
[83]

Colangelo and A

P. Colangelo and A. Khodjamirian, QCD sum rules, a modern perspective , hep-ph/0010175

arXiv
[84]

Albuquerque, J.M

R.M. Albuquerque, J.M. Dias, K.P. Khemchandani, A. Mart ´ ınez Torres, F.S. Navarra, M. Nielsen et al., QCD sum rules approach to the X, Y and Z states, J. Phys. G 46 (2019) 093002 [1812.08207]. – 19 –

2019 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [61]

Jiang, W

J.-F. Jiang, W. Chen and S.-L. Zhu, Triply heavy QQ ¯Q¯q tetraquark states, Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 094022 [ 1708.00142]

arXiv 2017

[2] [70]

Zhang and L

W.-S. Zhang and L. Tang, Investigating triply heavy tetraquark states through QCD sum rules, 2412.11531

arXiv

[3] [1]

Particle Data Groupcollaboration, Review of particle physics , Phys. Rev. D 110 (2024) 030001

2024

[4] [2]

Belle collaboration, Observation of a narrow charmonium-like state in exclusive B± → K ±π+π−J/ψ decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 (2003) 262001 [ hep-ex/0309032]

arXiv 2003

[5] [3]

Liu, An overview of XY Znew particles, Chin

X. Liu, An overview of XY Znew particles, Chin. Sci. Bull. 59 (2014) 3815 [ 1312.7408]

arXiv 2014

[6] [4]

Hosaka, T

A. Hosaka, T. Iijima, K. Miyabayashi, Y. Sakai and S. Yasui, Exotic hadrons with heavy flavors: X, Y, Z, and related states , PTEP 2016 (2016) 062C01 [ 1603.09229]

arXiv 2016

[7] [5]

H.-X. Chen, W. Chen, X. Liu and S.-L. Zhu, The hidden-charm pentaquark and tetraquark states, Phys. Rept. 639 (2016) 1 [ 1601.02092]

arXiv 2016

[8] [6]

Richard, Exotic hadrons: review and perspectives , Few Body Syst

J.-M. Richard, Exotic hadrons: review and perspectives , Few Body Syst. 57 (2016) 1185 [1606.08593]

arXiv 2016