Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Triply heavy tetraquarks are compact, all unstable against rearrangement, and a few stay narrow from amplitude cancellation, with masses fixed in two clear windows.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Triply heavy tetraquarks cc¯c¯q and bb¯b¯q are compact, unstable states with ground masses 5.2–5.5 GeV and 15.0–15.3 GeV; narrow resonances arise from amplitude cancellation and should appear in J/ψDs*/ηcDs and ΥB* channels.

T0 review reviewed 2026-07-14 challenge →

load-bearing objection Solid, usable systematics for the empty triply-heavy sector: concrete masses, widths and search channels from a standard GEM + quark-interchange calculation, with the usual model-extrapolation caveat. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2603.10922 v2 pith:5U3YHKQP submitted 2026-03-11 hep-ph

Systematic exploration of triply heavy tetraquarks: spectroscopic and decay characteristics

Hong-Tao An , Yu-Shuai Li , Si-Qiang Luo This is my paper
classification hep-ph
keywords triply heavy tetraquarksnonrelativistic quark modelGaussian expansion methodcolor-spin mixingrearrangement decayscompact tetraquarksquark-interchange model
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper sets out to map the low-lying S-wave spectrum and decay pattern of the four triply heavy systems cc¯c¯n, cc¯c¯s, bb¯b¯n and bb¯b¯s, which have never been seen experimentally. Using a non-relativistic quark model whose parameters were fixed on ordinary mesons, it solves the four-body Schrödinger equation with Gaussian bases and includes color-spin mixing. Both the charm and bottom families produce exactly two 0+, three 1+ and one 2+ states, sitting in the 5.2–5.5 GeV and 15.0–15.3 GeV windows respectively. Root-mean-square radii show the states are compact, not loosely bound molecules. All of them lie above open-flavor thresholds, so rearrangement strong decays dominate while radiative widths are tiny; a handful of states remain narrow because the four quark-interchange diagrams cancel. The concrete mass windows and branching ratios give experiment a clear target list in J/ψ D*s/ηc Ds and Υ B* channels.

Core claim

Both the cc¯c¯q and bb¯b¯q systems each contain precisely two J^P = 0+, three J^P = 1+ and one J^P = 2+ ground states whose masses fall in 5.2–5.5 GeV and 15.0–15.3 GeV; every state is a compact tetraquark that decays mainly by quark rearrangement, and selected resonances (for example Tc^{2}¯c¯s(5360,0+) and Tb^{2}¯b¯n(15052,0+)) stay narrow because the four Feynman amplitudes interfere destructively.

What carries the argument

An effective non-relativistic Hamiltonian (confinement plus color-spin hyperfine terms) is diagonalized for the four-body system by the Gaussian expansion method in Jacobi coordinates, with full color-spin configuration mixing; the same wave functions then feed a quark-interchange model that evaluates OZI-allowed two-body widths.

Load-bearing premise

The same simple potential fitted only to ordinary meson masses remains accurate enough for four-body systems that contain three heavy quarks and sit above open-flavor thresholds, with continuum and molecular effects neglected.

What would settle it

A dedicated scan of the J/ψ D*s and ηc Ds invariant-mass spectra in the 5.3–5.4 GeV window that either finds a narrow peak near 5360 MeV with roughly equal branching fractions to those two channels, or rules it out at the few-MeV level.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Experiments can target two compact mass windows—5.3–5.4 GeV in charm and 15.0–15.1 GeV in bottom—with specific final states that already have good reconstruction efficiency.
  • Partner states that are nearly mass-degenerate can still be told apart by their total widths and dominant branching ratios.
  • The same cancellation mechanism that produces the narrow 0+ states will appear in any other rearrangement calculation that keeps the four quark-interchange diagrams.
  • If the predicted compact radii are confirmed, molecular interpretations of these particular quantum numbers become disfavored.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same Hamiltonian and Gaussian machinery can be applied immediately to the mixed-flavor triply heavy systems (e.g., cc¯b¯q) that are still missing from the present survey.
  • A null result in the proposed 5.3–5.4 GeV window would force a re-examination of how much continuum coupling must be restored once the states sit above threshold.
  • The pattern of amplitude cancellation suggests that other four-body systems with identical heavy-quark pairs may also hide unexpectedly narrow resonances.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper applies a nonrelativistic quark model (confinement plus color-spin hyperfine Hamiltonian with eight parameters fixed exclusively to ordinary meson masses) to the four triply heavy systems cc¯c¯n, cc¯c¯s, bb¯b¯n and bb¯b¯s. The four-body Schrödinger equation is solved with the Gaussian expansion method in Jacobi coordinates, color-spin configuration mixing is diagonalized, and the resulting wave functions are used to extract masses, RMS radii, radiative widths (tree-level quark-photon coupling) and OZI-allowed rearrangement widths (quark-interchange model). Both flavor sectors are predicted to contain exactly two 0+, three 1+ and one 2+ S-wave states, with ground-state masses in the windows 5.2–5.5 GeV and 15.0–15.3 GeV; all states lie above open-flavor thresholds, are compact according to the RMS analysis, and decay dominantly by rearrangement, a subset remaining narrow because of destructive interference among the four quark-interchange diagrams. Concrete experimental search channels (J/ψD*_s / η_c D_s near 5.3–5.4 GeV and ΥB* near 15.0–15.1 GeV) are proposed.

Significance. If the predictions hold, the work supplies the first fully consistent spectroscopic-plus-decay survey of the experimentally unexplored triply heavy sector within a single Hamiltonian and wave-function framework. The explicit color-spin mixing matrices (Table III), the RMS radii that quantitatively support compact rather than molecular configurations (Table IV), and the falsifiable partial-width ratios that arise from diagram cancellation constitute concrete, testable guidance for LHCb, Belle II and BESIII. The calculation is parameter-free once the meson fit is fixed, and the same wave functions feed both spectra and decays—an internal consistency that is a genuine strength relative to many earlier estimates.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract, Sec. IV B, Table IV] Abstract versus Sec. IV B / Table IV: the abstract lists T_{b^{2}¯b¯n}(15148,2+) as a narrow-resonance example arising from Feynman-amplitude cancellation, yet Table IV and the explicit discussion in Sec. IV B assign that state a total width of 13–14 MeV while the genuinely narrow state (Γ < 1 MeV) is T_{b^{2}¯b¯n}(15052,0+). The same mismatch appears in the proposed search window (15.1–15.2 GeV versus 15.0–15.1 GeV). This is a load-bearing misidentification of the paper’s own central claim about narrow states and must be corrected throughout.
  2. [Sec. II A, Table I] Sec. II A and Table I: the eight Hamiltonian parameters are determined solely from two-body meson spectra and then applied without adjustment to four-body systems that sit 100–300 MeV above open-flavor thresholds. Continuum coupling, possible molecular admixtures and relativistic corrections are therefore uncontrolled. While this is a standard model assumption, the paper’s strongest claim (existence and narrowness of specific resonances) rests on it; a quantitative estimate of the associated uncertainty, or a systematic comparison with the lattice and QCD-sum-rule results already cited in the Introduction, is required for the claim to be robust.
  3. [Sec. III C, Fig. 2, Table III] Sec. III C, Eqs. (23)–(27) and the four diagrams of Fig. 2: the narrow widths are attributed to destructive interference among the C1, C2, T1 and T2 amplitudes. Because the relative weights of those diagrams are fixed by the color-spin mixing angles of Table III and by the GEM wave functions, the cancellation is model-dependent. A short sensitivity check (varying the mixing angles within the range allowed by the off-diagonal ⟨H⟩ entries, or rescaling the relative diagram strengths) would demonstrate that the narrowness is not an accidental numerical cancellation.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Table III] Table III (bb¯b¯s 1+ block): the off-diagonal entry is printed as “15503”; comparison with Table II shows it must be 15203. Correct the typographical error.
  2. [Throughout] Notation for the states oscillates between T_{c2¯c¯s}, T_{c^{2}¯c¯s} and T_{c^{2}¯c¯s}; adopt one consistent superscript convention throughout the text, tables and figures.
  3. [Figs. 3–4] Figs. 3 and 4 are information-dense; the partial-width ratios printed beneath the mass lines are hard to parse at journal scale. Consider moving the numerical ratios into a supplementary table or enlarging the font.
  4. [Sec. III A, Table IV] The RMS-radius discussion (Sec. III A) correctly notes the equality ⟨r_{13}⟩ = ⟨r_{23}⟩ etc. forced by identical heavy quarks, but never states the numerical precision with which the GEM basis respects that equality; a one-sentence check would be reassuring.
  5. [Sec. I, Sec. IV] Several references to earlier quark-model work on the same systems (e.g., the extended chromomagnetic and relativized-quark-model papers already cited) give only mass ranges; a short side-by-side mass table would help the reader gauge the model dependence without hunting through the literature.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: Hamiltonian parameters are fixed once on external meson data and then held fixed; tetraquark masses, RMS radii and widths are genuine four-body extrapolations, not re-fits or definitional identities.

full rationale

The derivation chain is standard and non-circular. Eight free parameters of the non-relativistic Hamiltonian (Eqs. 1–3) are determined solely by a least-squares fit to experimental masses of ordinary mesons (D, D*, Ds, ηc, J/ψ, B, Υ, \ldots) listed in Table I; those parameters are thereafter frozen. The four-body Schrödinger equation is solved with the Gaussian expansion method (Eqs. 11–16) for every color-spin configuration allowed by the Pauli principle (Table II). Color-spin mixing is performed by diagonalizing the resulting Hamiltonian matrix (Table III), yielding the physical masses quoted in the abstract and Figs. 3–4. RMS radii (Eq. 17, Table IV) and rearrangement widths (quark-interchange T-matrix, Eqs. 23–27) are computed from the same fixed wave functions. None of these steps re-uses tetraquark data, redefines a fitted quantity as a prediction, or imports a uniqueness theorem from the authors’ prior papers. Self-citations [74–77] merely document earlier applications of the identical method to other multi-quark systems; the load-bearing numerical input remains the external meson spectrum. Consequently the claimed state counting, mass windows, compactness and narrow-width mechanism are genuine model predictions, not circular restatements of the inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

6 free parameters · 4 axioms · 0 invented entities

The entire prediction chain rests on a non-relativistic Hamiltonian whose eight free parameters are fitted to ordinary meson masses, on the assumption that the same potential governs four-body systems, and on the neglect of continuum and relativistic corrections. No new dynamical entity is postulated; the tetraquark states themselves are the predicted objects.

free parameters (6)
  • mn (light-quark mass) = 466.0 MeV
    Fitted to D, D*, B, B* masses; enters kinetic and hyperfine terms.
  • ms (strange-quark mass) = 681.0 MeV
    Fitted to Ds, Ds*, Bs, Bs* masses.
  • mc (charm-quark mass) = 1933.0 MeV
    Fitted to charmonium and open-charm mesons.
  • mb (bottom-quark mass) = 5345.0 MeV
    Fitted to bottomonium and open-bottom mesons.
  • a0 (confinement strength) = 3.26e-2 (MeV^-1 fm)^{1/2}
    Linear-potential coefficient fixed by meson spectrum.
  • κ0, γ, α, β, D, κ (remaining potential parameters) = see Table I
    Coulomb, hyperfine and constant terms all adjusted simultaneously to the same meson data set (Table I).
axioms (4)
  • domain assumption Non-relativistic Schrödinger equation with pairwise color-Coulomb + linear + hyperfine potential is adequate for ground-state heavy tetraquarks.
    Stated in Sec. II A; no relativistic kinetic or spin-orbit terms are retained.
  • domain assumption Color confinement is realized solely by the two-body operator −(3/4) λi·λj (VC + VCS).
    Eq. (1); multi-body confinement forces are omitted.
  • standard math Gaussian expansion with nmax = 5–7 and rmax = 5 fm yields fully converged four-body eigenvalues.
    Sec. II B; authors verify stability under basis enlargement.
  • domain assumption OZI-allowed rearrangement decays dominate; three-body and annihilation channels can be neglected for total-width estimates.
    Sec. III C and final paragraph of Sec. IV.

reviewed 2026-07-14 · how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Systematic exploration of triply heavy tetraquarks: spectroscopic and decay characteristics." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/5U3YHKQP

@misc{pith2026260310922,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Systematic exploration of triply heavy tetraquarks: spectroscopic and decay characteristics},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/5U3YHKQP}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2603.10922}
}
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
abstract

While hidden, singly, doubly, and fully heavy tetraquark states have been experimentally observed, triply heavy tetraquark states remain experimentally unconfirmed. We systematically investigate the spectroscopic and decay properties of four triply heavy-flavor tetraquark systems ($cc\bar{c}\bar{n}$, $cc\bar{c}\bar{s}$, $bb\bar{b}\bar{n}$, $bb\bar{b}\bar{s}$; $n=u,d$) based on the nonrelativistic quark model. Using an effective Hamiltonian, we employ the Gaussian expansion method to solve the four-body Schr\"{o}dinger equation and incorporate the effect of color-spin configuration mixing. Results show both $cc\bar{c}\bar{q}$ and $bb\bar{b}\bar{q}$ systems have two $J^{P}=0^{+}$, three $J^{P}=1^{+}$, and one $J^{P}=2^{+}$ states, with ground-state masses of 5.2-5.5 GeV and 15.0-15.3 GeV, respectively. Root-mean-square radius analysis supports compact tetraquark configurations. All states are unstable, with rearrangement strong decays dominant and negligible radiative decays. Narrow resonances (e.g., $T_{c^{2}\bar{c}\bar{s}}(5360,0^{+})$, $T_{b^{2}\bar{b}\bar{n}}(15148,2^{+})$) arise from Feynman amplitude cancellation. We propose experimental searches in $J/\psi D^{*}_{s}$/ $\eta_{c}D_{s}$ (5.3-5.4 GeV) and $\Upsilon B^{*}$ (15.1-15.2 GeV) channels, providing key guidance for triply heavy tetraquark identification.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Singly heavy tetraquarks

    hep-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    A hybrid quark model with gluon and meson exchange predicts that LHCb's T-c̄s̄0(2870) and T-cs̄0(2900) are compact tetraquarks, and that Ds0(2317), Ds1(2460), Tbs(5568), and Tcs(2327) are not.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

107 extracted references · 5 linked inside Pith · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Consequently, most of the ccc¯u/ccc¯dandbbb¯u/bbb ¯dstates have similar total decay widths

    Furthermore, compared to the radiative decay widths, two-body strong decays are the dominant decay chan- nels for these resonances. Consequently, most of the ccc¯u/ccc¯dandbbb¯u/bbb ¯dstates have similar total decay widths. First, for theJ P = 2 + cc¯c¯sstate,T c2¯c¯s(5489,2 +) mainly decays into theJ/ψD ∗ s final state via anS- wave within the rearrangem...

    1985

  2. [2]

    H. X. Chen, W. Chen, X. Liu, and S. L. Zhu, The hidden-charm pentaquark and tetraquark states, Phys. Rept.639, 1–121 (2016). 15

    2016

  3. [3]

    F. K. Guo, C. Hanhart, U. G. Meißner, Q. Wang, Q. Zhao, and B. S. Zou, Hadronic molecules, Rev. Mod. Phys.90, 015004 (2018), [Erratum: Rev.Mod.Phys. 94, 029901 (2022)]

    2018

  4. [4]

    Brambilla, S

    N. Brambilla, S. Eidelman, C. Hanhart, A. Nefediev, C. P. Shen, C. E. Thomas, A. Vairo, and C. Z. Yuan, TheXY Zstates: experimental and theoretical status and perspectives, Phys. Rept.873, 1–154 (2020)

    2020

  5. [5]

    Y. R. Liu, H. X. Chen, W. Chen, X. Liu, and S. L. Zhu, Pentaquark and Tetraquark states, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.107, 237–320 (2019)

    2019

  6. [6]

    Hosaka, T

    A. Hosaka, T. Iijima, K. Miyabayashi, Y. Sakai, and S. Yasui, Exotic hadrons with heavy flavors:X,Y,Z, and related states, PTEP2016, 062C01 (2016)

    2016

  7. [7]

    H. X. Chen, W. Chen, X. Liu, Y. R. Liu, and S. L. Zhu, An updated review of the new hadron states, Rept. Prog. Phys.86, 026201 (2023)

    2023

  8. [8]

    Liu, An overview ofXY Znew particles, Chin

    X. Liu, An overview ofXY Znew particles, Chin. Sci. Bull.59, 3815–3830 (2014)

    2014

  9. [9]

    S. K. Choiet al. (Belle Collaboration), Observation of a narrow charmonium-like state in exclusiveB ± → K ±π+π−J/ψdecays, Phys. Rev. Lett.91, 262001 (2003)

    2003

  10. [10]

    Aaijet al

    R. Aaijet al. (LHCb Collaboration), Observation of J/ψpResonances Consistent with Pentaquark States in Λ0 b →J/ψK −pDecays, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 072001 (2015)

    2015

  11. [11]

    Aaijet al

    R. Aaijet al. (LHCb Collaboration), Observation of a narrow pentaquark state,P c(4312)+, and of two- peak structure of theP c(4450)+, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 222001 (2019)

    2019

  12. [12]

    Aaijet al

    R. Aaijet al. (LHCb Collaboration), Evidence of a J/ψΛ structure and observation of excited Ξ − states in the Ξ − b →J/ψΛK − decay, Sci. Bull.66, 1278–1287 (2021)

    2021

  13. [13]

    Aaijet al

    R. Aaijet al. (LHCb Collaboration), Observation of a J/ψΛ Resonance Consistent with a Strange Pentaquark Candidate inB − →J/ψΛ¯pDecays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 031901 (2023)

    2023

  14. [14]

    Ablikimet al

    M. Ablikimet al. (BESIII Collaboration), Observa- tion of a charged charmoniumlike structure ine +e− → (D∗ ¯D∗)±π∓ at √s= 4.26GeV, Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 132001 (2014)

    2014

  15. [15]

    Bondaret al

    A. Bondaret al. (Belle Collaboration), Observation of two charged bottomonium-like resonances in Y(5S) de- cays, Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 122001 (2012)

    2012

  16. [16]

    Aaijet al

    R. Aaijet al. (LHCb Collaboration), Observation of a Resonant Structure near theD + s D− s Threshold in the B+ →D + s D− s K+ Decay, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 071901 (2023)

    2023

  17. [17]

    Chatrchyanet al

    S. Chatrchyanet al. (CMS Collaboration), Observation of a Peaking Structure in theJ/ψϕMass Spectrum from B± →J/ψϕK ± Decays, Phys. Lett. B734, 261–281 (2014)

    2014

  18. [18]

    Aaijet al

    R. Aaijet al. (LHCb Collaboration), Observation of J/ψϕstructures consistent with exotic states from am- plitude analysis ofB + →J/ψϕK + decays, Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 022003 (2017)

    2017

  19. [19]

    Aaijet al

    R. Aaijet al. (LHCb Collaboration), Observation of New Resonances Decaying toJ/ψK + andJ/ψϕ, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 082001 (2021)

    2021

  20. [20]

    M. N. Anwar, J. Ferretti, and E. Santopinto, Spec- troscopy of the hidden-charm [qc][¯q¯c] and [sc][¯s¯c] tetraquarks in the relativized diquark model, Phys. Rev. D98, 094015 (2018)

    2018

  21. [21]

    Dubnicka, A

    S. Dubnicka, A. Z. Dubnickova, M. A. Ivanov, J. G. Ko- erner, P. Santorelli, and G. G. Saidullaeva, One-photon decay of the tetraquark stateX(3872)→γ+J/ψin a relativistic constituent quark model with infrared con- finement, Phys. Rev. D84, 014006 (2011)

    2011

  22. [22]

    Dubnicka, A

    S. Dubnicka, A. Z. Dubnickova, M. A. Ivanov, and J. G. Korner, Quark model description of the tetraquark state X(3872) in a relativistic constituent quark model with infrared confinement, Phys. Rev. D81, 114007 (2010)

    2010

  23. [23]

    J. Wu, Y. R. Liu, K. Chen, X. Liu, and S. L. Zhu, X(4140),X(4270),X(4500) andX(4700) and theircs¯c¯s tetraquark partners, Phys. Rev. D94, 094031 (2016)

    2016

  24. [24]

    M. Z. Liu, X. Z. Ling, and L. S. Geng, Productions of X(3872)/Zc(3900) and X2(4013)/Zc(4020) in Y(4220) and Y(4360) decays, Phys. Rev. D110, 054035 (2024)

    2024

  25. [25]

    Z. P. Wang, F. L. Wang, G. J. Wang, and X. Liu, Probing exoticJ P C resonances from deeply bound char- moniumlike molecules: Insights for identifying exotic hadrons, Phys. Rev. D110, L051501 (2024)

    2024

  26. [26]

    Godfrey and S

    S. Godfrey and S. L. Olsen, The Exotic XYZ Charmonium-like Mesons, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 58, 51–73 (2008)

    2008

  27. [27]

    F. L. Wang, X. D. Yang, R. Chen, and X. Liu, Corre- lation of the hidden-charm molecular tetraquarks and the charmoniumlike structures existing in theB→ XY Z+Kprocess, Phys. Rev. D104, 094010 (2021)

    2021

  28. [28]

    Wang and X

    P. Wang and X. G. Wang, Study on X(3872) from effec- tive field theory with pion exchange interaction, Phys. Rev. Lett.111, 042002 (2013)

    2013

  29. [29]

    Aubertet al

    B. Aubertet al. (BaBar Collaboration), Observation of a narrow meson decaying toD + s π0 at a mass of 2.32- GeV/c2, Phys. Rev. Lett.90, 242001 (2003)

    2003

  30. [30]

    Bessonet al

    D. Bessonet al. (CLEO Collaboration), Observation of a narrow resonance of mass 2.46 GeV/c 2 decaying to D∗+ s π0 and confirmation of theD ∗ sJ(2317) state, Phys. Rev. D68, 032002 (2003), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 75, 119908 (2007)]

    2003

  31. [31]

    Y. Q. Chen and X. Q. Li, A Comprehensive four-quark interpretation ofD s(2317),D s(2457) andD s(2632), Phys. Rev. Lett.93, 232001 (2004)

    2004

  32. [32]

    H. Y. Cheng and W. S. Hou, B decays as spectroscope for charmed four quark states, Phys. Lett. B566, 193– 200 (2003)

    2003

  33. [33]

    Kim and Y

    H. Kim and Y. Oh, D(s)(2317) as a four-quark state in QCD sum rules, Phys. Rev. D72, 074012 (2005)

    2005

  34. [34]

    F. K. Guo, P. N. Shen, and H. C. Chiang, Dynamically generated 1+ heavy mesons, Phys. Lett. B647, 133–139 (2007)

    2007

  35. [35]

    Barnes, F

    T. Barnes, F. E. Close, and H. J. Lipkin, Implications of a DK molecule at 2.32-GeV, Phys. Rev. D68, 054006 (2003)

    2003

  36. [36]

    F. S. Navarra, M. Nielsen, E. Oset, and T. Seki- hara, Testing the molecular nature ofD ∗ s0(2317) and D∗ 0(2400) in semileptonicB s andBdecays, Phys. Rev. D92, 014031 (2015)

    2015

  37. [37]

    Aaijet al

    R. Aaijet al. (LHCb Collaboration), A model- independent study of resonant structure inB + → D+D−K+ decays, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 242001 (2020)

    2020

  38. [38]

    Aaijet al

    R. Aaijet al. (LHCb Collaboration), Amplitude analy- sis of theB + →D +D−K+ decay, Phys. Rev. D102, 112003 (2020)

    2020

  39. [39]

    Aaijet al

    R. Aaijet al. (LHCb Collaboration), First Observation of a Doubly Charged Tetraquark and Its Neutral Part- 16 ner, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 041902 (2023)

    2023

  40. [40]

    Aaijet al

    R. Aaijet al. (LHCb Collaboration), Amplitude analysis ofB 0 → ¯D0D+ s π− andB + →D −D+ s π+ decays, Phys. Rev. D108, 012017 (2023)

    2023

  41. [41]

    Aaijet al

    R. Aaijet al. (LHCb Collaboration), Observation of an exotic narrow doubly charmed tetraquark, Nature Phys. 18, 751–754 (2022)

    2022

  42. [42]

    Aaijet al

    R. Aaijet al. (LHCb Collaboration), Study of the dou- bly charmed tetraquarkT + cc, Nature Commun.13, 3351 (2022)

    2022

  43. [43]

    Aaijet al

    R. Aaijet al. (LHCb Collaboration), Observation of structure in theJ/ψ-pair mass spectrum, Sci. Bull.65, 1983–1993 (2020)

    1983

  44. [44]

    Hayrapetyanet al

    A. Hayrapetyanet al. (CMS Collaboration), New Struc- tures in the J/ψJ/ψMass Spectrum in Proton-Proton Collisions at s=13 TeV, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 111901 (2024)

    2024

  45. [45]

    Aadet al

    G. Aadet al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Observation of an Excess of Dicharmonium Events in the Four-Muon Final State with the ATLAS Detector, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 151902 (2023)

    2023

  46. [46]

    Huang, J

    G. Huang, J. Zhao, and P. Zhuang, Pair structure of heavy tetraquark systems, Phys. Rev. D103, 054014 (2021)

    2021

  47. [47]

    Q. F. L¨ u, D. Y. Chen, and Y. B. Dong, Masses of fully heavy tetraquarksQQ ¯Q ¯Qin an extended relativized quark model, Eur. Phys. J. C80, 871 (2020)

    2020

  48. [48]

    M. S. liu, F. X. Liu, X. H. Zhong, and Q. Zhao, Fully heavy tetraquark states and their evidences in LHC ob- servations, Phys. Rev. D109, 076017 (2024)

    2024

  49. [49]

    R. M. Albuquerque, S. Narison, A. Rabemananjara, D. Rabetiarivony, and G. Randriamanatrika, Doubly- hidden scalar heavy molecules and tetraquarks states from QCD at NLO, Phys. Rev. D102, 094001 (2020)

    2020

  50. [50]

    B. C. Yang, L. Tang, and C. F. Qiao, Scalar fully- heavy tetraquark statesQQ ′ ¯Q ¯Q′ in QCD sum rules, Eur. Phys. J. C81, 324 (2021)

    2021

  51. [51]

    N. Li, Y. Xing, and J. R. Shi, Analysis of triply charmed four-quark state in the effective Lagrangian approach, arXiv:2503.03555 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  52. [52]

    J. B. Cheng, S. Y. Li, Y. R. Liu, Y. N. Liu, Z. G. Si, and T. Yao, Spectrum and rearrangement decays of tetraquark states with four different flavors, Phys. Rev. D101, 114017 (2020)

    2020

  53. [53]

    H. M. Yang, Y. Ma, W. L. Wu, and S. L. Zhu, Triply heavy tetraquark states with different flavors, Phys. Rev. D111, 074040 (2025)

    2025

  54. [54]

    Y. J. Xu, L. G. Tian, Y. Li, J. Y. Wu, Y. L. Liu, and M. Q. Huang, Scalar Triple-Heavy Tetraquark States With Quark Contentcc¯c¯s, arXiv:2506.14527 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  55. [55]

    Xing, Weak decays of triply heavy tetraquarksb¯cb¯q, Eur

    Y. Xing, Weak decays of triply heavy tetraquarksb¯cb¯q, Eur. Phys. J. C80, 57 (2020)

    2020

  56. [56]

    K. Chen, X. Liu, J. Wu, Y. R. Liu, and S. L. Zhu, Triply heavy tetraquark states with theQQ ¯Q¯qconfiguration, Eur. Phys. J. A53, 5 (2017)

    2017

  57. [57]

    X. Liu, Y. Tan, D. Chen, H. Huang, and J. Ping, Pos- sible triply heavy tetraquark states in a chiral quark model, Phys. Rev. D107, 054019 (2023)

    2023

  58. [58]

    R. J. Hudspith, B. Colquhoun, A. Francis, R. Lewis, and K. Maltman, A lattice investigation of exotic tetraquark channels, Phys. Rev. D102, 114506 (2020)

    2020

  59. [59]

    Junnarkar, N

    P. Junnarkar, N. Mathur, and M. Padmanath, Study of doubly heavy tetraquarks in Lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D99, 034507 (2019)

    2019

  60. [60]

    X. Z. Weng, W. Z. Deng, and S. L. Zhu, Triply heavy tetraquark states, Phys. Rev. D105, 034026 (2022)

    2022

  61. [61]

    Silvestre-Brac and C

    B. Silvestre-Brac and C. Semay, Systematics of L = 0 q2¯q2 systems, Z. Phys. C57, 273–282 (1993)

    1993

  62. [62]

    Q. F. L¨ u, D. Y. Chen, Y. B. Dong, and E. San- topinto, Triply-heavy tetraquarks in an extended rela- tivized quark model, Phys. Rev. D104, 054026 (2021)

    2021

  63. [63]

    G. Yang, J. Ping, and J. Segovia, Triply charm and bottom tetraquarks in a constituent quark model, Phys. Rev. D110, 054036 (2024)

    2024

  64. [64]

    J. F. Jiang, W. Chen, and S. L. Zhu, Triply heavyQQ¯Q¯q tetraquark states, Phys. Rev. D96, 094022 (2017)

    2017

  65. [65]

    S. Y. Li, Y. R. Liu, Z. L. Man, C. R. Shu, Z. G. Si, and J. Wu, Triply Heavy Tetraquark States in a Mass- Splitting Model, Symmetry17, 170 (2025)

    2025

  66. [66]

    G. Yang, J. Ping, and J. Segovia, Triply heavy tetraquarks ¯bc¯qcand ¯cb¯qbin a constituent quark model, arXiv:2507.13728 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  67. [67]

    L. Meng, Y. K. Chen, Y. Ma, and S. L. Zhu, Tetraquark bound states in constituent quark models: Benchmark test calculations, Phys. Rev. D108, 114016 (2023)

    2023

  68. [68]

    Z. H. Zhu, W. X. Zhang, and D. Jia, Triply heavy tetraquark states: masses and other properties, Eur. Phys. J. C84, 344 (2024)

    2024

  69. [69]

    Mutuk, Flavor exotic triply-heavy tetraquark states in AdS/QCD potential, Eur

    H. Mutuk, Flavor exotic triply-heavy tetraquark states in AdS/QCD potential, Eur. Phys. J. C83, 358 (2023)

    2023

  70. [70]

    A. Park, W. Park, and S. H. Lee, Dibaryons with two strange quarks and one heavy flavor in a constituent quark model, Phys. Rev. D94, 054027 (2016)

    2016

  71. [71]

    W. Park, A. Park, S. Cho, and S. H. Lee,P c(4380) in a constituent quark model, Phys. Rev. D95, 054027 (2017)

    2017

  72. [72]

    S. Noh, W. Park, and S. H. Lee, The Doubly-heavy Tetraquarks (qq ′ ¯Q ¯Q′) in a Constituent Quark Model with a Complete Set of Harmonic Oscillator Bases, Phys. Rev. D103, 114009 (2021)

    2021

  73. [73]

    Park and S

    W. Park and S. Noh, Doubly-charmed pentaquark in a quark model with a complete set of harmonic oscillator bases, Phys. Rev. D108, 014026 (2023)

    2023

  74. [74]

    Park and S

    W. Park and S. Noh, Investigation on the stabilities of doubly heavy tetraquark states, Phys. Rev. D110, 074041 (2024)

    2024

  75. [75]

    H. T. An, S. Q. Luo, Z. W. Liu, and X. Liu, Spectro- scopic behavior of fully heavy tetraquarks, Eur. Phys. J. C83, 740 (2023)

    2023

  76. [76]

    H. T. An, S. Q. Luo, Z. W. Liu, and X. Liu, Fully heavy pentaquark states in constituent quark model, Phys. Rev. D105, 074032 (2022)

    2022

  77. [77]

    H. T. An and Y. S. Li, Systematic investigation of the spectroscopy and decay behaviors of doubly-charmed pentaquarks, arXiv:2512.08643 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  78. [78]

    H. T. An, S. Q. Luo, and X. Liu, Doubly charmed hexaquarks in the diquark picture, Phys. Rev. D112, 054041 (2025)

    2025

  79. [79]

    Hiyama, Y

    E. Hiyama, Y. Kino, and M. Kamimura, Gaussian ex- pansion method for few-body systems, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.51, 223–307 (2003)

    2003

  80. [80]

    Hiyama, Gaussian expansion method for few-body systems and its applications to atomic and nuclear physics, PTEP2012, 01A204 (2012)

    E. Hiyama, Gaussian expansion method for few-body systems and its applications to atomic and nuclear physics, PTEP2012, 01A204 (2012)

    2012

Showing first 80 references.

This paper was first reviewed by grok-4.5 on July 14, 2026.