Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 146 references

Primordial Gravitational Waves as Complementary Probe of Dark Matter Indirect Detection

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Upcoming gravitational-wave missions can measure dark matter mass and annihilation cross-section from the dip that an early matter-dominated epoch leaves in the inflationary gravitational-wave spectrum.

desk verdict The EMD-to-DM mapping at the core of this forecast is internally inconsistent—their own Tdom formulas make the required freeze-out-before-EMD history impossible for M_N > M_ch—so the quoted GW reach numbers rest on an invalid benchmark regime. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.17568 v1 pith:YX5XIVC6 submitted 2025-06-21 hep-ph astro-ph.COgr-qc

Anish Ghoshal , Debarun Paul , Supratik Pal This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-phastro-ph.COgr-qc
keywords primordialgravitationalwavesearlymatterdominationdarkindirectdetectionnon-thermalFisherforecaststochasticwavebackgroundtensorspectralindexcomplementarity
topics Dark Matter
open problems Dark Matter
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper sets out to show that the thermal history of the universe before Big Bang nucleosynthesis leaves a measurable mark on the gravitational waves produced during inflation, and that this mark can be used to weigh dark matter. In the specific scenario studied, a long-lived particle dominates the universe for a while (early matter domination) and its decay both dilutes and then replenishes the dark matter relic; the resulting frequency-dependent dip in the primordial gravitational-wave spectrum encodes when that era began and ended. Because the decay time is linked to the dark matter mass and annihilation cross-section by the relic-abundance condition, the dip position and width become a cosmological ruler for dark matter parameters. Using signal-to-noise and Fisher forecasts, the paper identifies benchmark points where future detectors—especially the Einstein Telescope and µ-ARES—can measure those parameters to roughly one and seven percent precision, overlapping the projected reach of gamma-ray and neutrino indirect searches.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the EMD-modified tensor transfer function $F(k)|_{\rm EMD} = T_1^2(k/k_{\rm eq})\,T_2^2(k/k_{\rm dec})\,T_3^2(k/k_{\rm dec,S})\,T_2^2(k/k_{\rm RH,S})$, built from the standard fitting functions $T_1$, $T_2$, $T_3$. The two characteristic scales $k_{\rm dec}$ and $k_{\rm dec,S}$ mark, respectively, the end of the early matter era and the entropy-dilution period caused by the decay of N, so the frequency and width of the suppression encode $T_{\rm dec}$ and the entropy dilution factor $\Delta_s$. The second piece is the relic-abundance link $T_{\rm dec} = (3\times10^{-26}\,{\rm cm^3/s}/\langle\sigma v\rangle_{\rm ann})\,T_f$ with $T_f \approx M_\chi/20$, which converts the dip into a constraint on the dark matter mass and annihilation cross-section; the critical branching ratio $Br^c_{N\to\chi}$ of Eq. (2.13) guarantees that enough non-thermal dark matter is produced for residual annihilation to set the final abundance.

What would settle it

Measure the tensor spectral index and tensor-to-scalar ratio with next-generation CMB experiments: if n_T is found at or below zero (as slow-roll inflation predicts) or r is found well below 0.036, then the EMD-modified spectrum plotted in the paper falls below all detector noise curves and the claimed dark-matter reach is falsified; conversely, detection of the predicted frequency-dependent dip in LISA, µ-ARES, BBO, or ET data at the forecast frequencies would confirm it.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that an epoch of early matter domination, driven by a heavy metastable particle N that decays partly into dark matter, imprints a characteristic two-step suppression on the inflationary gravitational-wave spectrum: a high-frequency step from reheating and a lower-frequency dip set by the decay temperature $T_{\rm dec}$. The transfer function for the tensor modes acquires an extra factor $T_3^2(k/k_{\rm dec,S})$, and the dip's frequency and width are fixed by the comoving scales $k_{\rm dec}$ and $k_{\rm dec,S}$, which depend on $T_{\rm dec}$ and the entropy dilution factor. The relic-abundance requirement then connects $T_{\rm dec}$ to the dark matter parameters through $T_{\rm dec} = (3\times10^{-26}\;{\rm cm^3/s}/\langle\sigma v\rangle_{\rm ann})\,T_f$, with $T_f \approx M_\chi/20$, so a measured dip translates directly into constraints on the dark matter mass and annihilation cross-section. On these grounds the authors forecast that LISA can reach masses from roughly 200 GeV to $10^5$ GeV, that the Einstein Telescope can measure a benchmark $(M_\chi, \langle\sigma v\rangle_{\rm ann}) = (10^5\,{\rm GeV}, 10^{-24}\,{\rm cm^3/s})$ to about one percent, and that µ-ARES can measure $(10^4\,{\rm GeV}, 2\times10^{-25}\,{\rm cm^3/s})$ to about seven percent; these regions overlap the projected sensitivities of CTA, ANTARES, and KM3NeT, defining the claimed complementarity.

Load-bearing premise

The projected reach rests on assuming the inflationary tensor spectrum is blue-tilted with index 0.5 and has the maximum amplitude currently allowed (r = 0.036); if either is smaller, the signal falls below the detectors' sensitivity.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For the benchmark choice $M_N = 10^5$ GeV, $n_T = 0.5$, and $r = 0.036$, LISA is sensitive to dark matter masses in the range $2\times10^2$ to $10^5$ GeV with annihilation cross-sections near $10^{-26}$ to $4\times10^{-24}$ cm$^3$/s.
  • The Einstein Telescope can measure a $10^5$ GeV dark matter candidate with cross-section $10^{-24}$ cm$^3$/s to about 1% precision, and a $10^5$ GeV candidate with cross-section $10^{-23}$ cm$^3$/s to similar precision, the latter lying inside the ANTARES and KM3NeT projections.
  • µ-ARES can measure a $10^4$ GeV candidate with cross-section $2\times10^{-25}$ cm$^3$/s to about 7% precision, a point that lies within the projected CTA reach.
  • The overlapping sensitivity regions mean the same dark matter candidate can be probed both by gravitational-wave observatories and by gamma-ray and neutrino indirect searches, providing an independent cosmological test.
  • If the tensor spectrum is scale-invariant ($n_T = 0$) at the maximal $r = 0.036$, the EMD-modified spectrum lies below all detector sensitivities, so the quoted reach is conditional on a blue-tilted spectrum.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If future CMB experiments tighten the tensor-to-scalar ratio below about 0.01 or exclude a blue tilt, the dark-matter reach quoted here would shrink proportionally, so the precision numbers are best read as upper limits set by the current maximal $r$.
  • The dip frequency and width are two independent observables determined by $T_{\rm dec}$ and the entropy dilution, while the relic-abundance relation ties $T_{\rm dec}$ to $M_\chi/\langle\sigma v\rangle$; a joint fit could separate mass from cross-section more cleanly than either observable alone.
  • The same EMD fingerprint should also appear in the scalar-induced secondary gravitational-wave background and in pulsar-timing bands if the epoch lasted long enough; detecting a dip there would corroborate the scenario before the space-based interferometer missions fly.
  • Fixing $M_N$ and $T_{\rm RH}$, as the Fisher analysis does, likely overstates the precision; treating them as free parameters in a full Markov-chain Monte Carlo analysis would broaden the reported error bars.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proposes that a period of early matter domination (EMD) generated by a long-lived SM-singlet particle N leaves a characteristic frequency-dependent suppression in the inflationary primordial gravitational wave (PGW) spectrum, and that the location and depth of this feature can be used to infer the dark matter mass M_chi and annihilation cross-section <sigma v>. The authors derive a relation between the DM parameters and the N decay temperature from the observed relic abundance, then compute signal-to-noise ratios and Fisher-matrix forecasts for mu-ARES, LISA, BBO, and ET. They overlay these GW sensitivities with current and projected indirect-detection constraints from gamma-ray (HESS, Fermi-LAT, CTA) and neutrino (ANTARES, KM3NeT) telescopes, concluding that GW missions and indirect searches probe complementary and overlapping regions of the (M_chi, <sigma v>) plane, with percent-level precision on selected benchmarks.

Significance. If the framework is sound, the proposal is a genuinely new cosmological probe of WIMP-like DM parameters, complementary to indirect detection and potentially relevant for both the GW and particle-astrophysics communities. The paper uses standard Boltzmann equations, a well-established PGW transfer-function formalism, and transparent detector noise models, and it gives explicit numerical forecasts with clearly specified benchmark points. The main quantitative claims are, however, conditional on two strong assumptions: a blue-tilted tensor spectrum (n_T = 0.5) with the maximum currently allowed tensor-to-scalar ratio (r = 0.036), and a particular mapping between the EMD epoch and DM freeze-out. As discussed below, the latter is internally inconsistent for the benchmarks plotted, and the former is not reflected in the abstract's broad statement of detection potential.

major comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 2.1-2.2, Eqs. (2.4), (2.5), (2.12)] The assumed thermal history is internally inconsistent. Combining Eqs. (2.4) and (2.5) with g_* ~ g_*s gives T_dom ~ 2 M_N. Then the freeze-out-before-EMD condition T_f > T_dom, with T_f ~ M_chi/20, requires M_chi > 40 M_N, which directly contradicts the stated requirement M_N > M_chi needed for N -> chi decay. For the benchmark M_N = 10^5 GeV used in Figs. 3-6, T_dom ~ 2 x 10^5 GeV while T_f <= 5 x 10^3 GeV for all M_chi <= 10^5 GeV, so every plotted point violates the stated thermal history. For a thermally populated single-species N, the physical onset is instead T_dom ~ (g_N/g_*) M_N ~ 10^-2 M_N, which shrinks the viable region to M_chi >~ 0.2 M_N and excludes several quoted benchmarks, e.g., (M_chi, <sigma v>) = (10^4 GeV, 2 x 10^-25 cm^3/s) with M_N = 10^5 GeV. Because Eq. (2.12) and all subsequent SNR and Fisher results depend on this mapping, the central claim that GW missions determine (M_chi, <sigma v>) is not supported for the benchmarks as quoted. The T_dom relation or the thermalization premise should be corrected, and the parameter-space reach recomputed.
  2. [Sec. 3.1, Sec. 4, Figs. 2-6] All detectability and precision statements are computed at the extremal values n_T = 0.5 and r = 0.036. The left panel of Fig. 2 shows that for n_T = 0 the EMD-modified GW spectrum lies below all detector sensitivities, and the conclusions do not state this strong dependence. If future CMB experiments lower the r bound, or if the single-field consistency relation n_T ~ -r/8 is imposed, the SNR > 10 regions shrink substantially or disappear. The abstract's broad claim of 'good potential' should be qualified by this explicit condition, or the reach should be presented as a function of (r, n_T).
  3. [Abstract, Sec. 5.1, Sec. 5.2, Sec. 6] The quantitative benchmark values quoted in the abstract are not mutually consistent with the body of the paper. The abstract states that ET reaches ~1% on (M_chi, <sigma v>) = (10^5 GeV, 10^-24 cm^3/s) and mu-ARES ~7% on (10^4 GeV, 2 x 10^-25 cm^3/s); Sec. 5.2 states ET ~1% on (10^3 GeV, 10^-24 cm^3/s) and mu-ARES ~7% on (10^4 GeV, 10^-25 cm^3/s); Sec. 5.1 states mu-ARES ~7% for (10^5 GeV, 10^-24 cm^3/s); and Sec. 6 repeats the (10^3, 10^-24) + (10^4, 2 x 10^-25) pair. These numbers should be harmonized, and the selected benchmarks should be checked against the corrected EMD viability condition from Sec. 2.
  4. [Sec. 4, Eq. (4.5), Figs. 5-6] The Fisher forecasts fix M_N = 10^5 GeV and T_RH = 10^11 GeV and vary only {M_chi, <sigma v>, n_T}. However, the EMD transfer function in Eqs. (3.9)-(3.15) depends directly on M_N and T_RH, and Fig. 2 demonstrates that varying these parameters changes the spectral shape in ways that can mimic changes in the DM parameters. The quoted percent-level uncertainties on (M_chi, <sigma v>) therefore assume exact knowledge of M_N and T_RH. Marginalizing over these parameters in the Fisher matrix, or at least demonstrating that the degeneracies are negligible, is needed to support the precision claims.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Fig. 2] The figure legend includes detectors (THEIA, GAIA, ARES) that are not described in Table 1 or in the noise-model appendix; please either remove these or specify their sensitivity curves.
  2. [Sec. 6] The illustrative benchmark '(tau_N, M_N) = (0.1, 5000) (in GeV)' is dimensionally ambiguous: tau_N is presumably in seconds and M_N in GeV. Please correct the units.
  3. [Fig. 5 caption/text] The text accompanying Fig. 5 says 'The results are shown for various GW observations, mu-ARES, LISA, BBO and LISA', with 'LISA' appearing twice; the second instance should name the fourth detector.
  4. [Throughout] There are several typographical slips, including 'the the origin' in Sec. 1 and 'SRN' for 'SNR' in Sec. 5.3; a careful proofreading pass is recommended.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

The GW 'determination' of dark matter mass and cross-section individually collapses to a single ratio set by Eq. (2.12); the two-parameter Fisher forecast is overparameterized and the quoted per-parameter precisions are not independent predictions.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Sec. 2.2 (Eq. 2.12), Sec. 3.1 (Eqs. 3.9-3.15), Sec. 4 (Eq. 4.5 with theta={Mchi,<sigma v>_ann,n_T})]
    "Recalling that the freeze-out temperature scales with the DM mass as Tf ≈ Mχ/20, Eq.(2.12) establishes a direct link between the DM parameters (Mχ,⟨σv⟩ann) and the EMD timescale set by τN = Γ−1N ... Since Tdec∼τ −1/2 N and Tf∼Mχ, the correct relic density is obtained when Mχ and ⟨σv⟩ann vary proportionally for fixed τN."

    Equation (2.12), combined with Tf≈Mχ/20, gives Tdec = (3×10−26/⟨σv⟩ann)(Mχ/20) ∝ Mχ/⟨σv⟩ann. For fixed MN and TRH, the EMD transfer function (Eqs. 3.9-3.15) depends on the thermal history only through Tdec, via kdec, kdec,S and kRH,S. Hence ΩGW(f) depends on Mχ and ⟨σv⟩ann only through their ratio y = Mχ/⟨σv⟩ann. The Fisher matrix on θ = {Mχ, ⟨σv⟩ann, nT} is therefore singular along the direction that changes Mχ and ⟨σv⟩ann at fixed y: the derivatives ∂ΩGW/∂lnMχ and ∂ΩGW/∂ln⟨σv⟩ann are equal and opposite. The reported ≈1% and ≈7% individual uncertainties on Mχ and ⟨σv⟩ann are thus not independent GW predictions; they reduce by construction to the single combination already enforced by the input relic-density relation (2.12).

full rationale

The paper's central derivation chain is not circular in the ordinary sense: Eq. (2.12) comes from comparing relic abundances under EMD with the standard freeze-out result, using the externally measured Planck relic density; the GW spectral suppression formulas are standard transfer-function results; and the Fisher framework is a conventional forecast applied to model parameters rather than to data. The heavy presence of the same authors' earlier papers (Refs. [8,10,11,93-101]) is a citation-practice observation, not by itself a circularity, because the load-bearing physical relations are stated in the paper and trace to independent-looking work (e.g., Refs. [43,44,79,137]). However, the headline claim that GW missions can determine the DM mass and annihilation cross-section separately with percent-level precision is overparameterized: because Eq. (2.12) forces Tdec ∝ Mχ/⟨σv⟩ann and the EMD transfer functions depend on Tdec only (for fixed MN and TRH), the observable spectrum is a function of the single ratio Mχ/⟨σv⟩ann. The two-parameter Fisher forecasts in Figs. 5, 6, 13 and 16 therefore cannot yield independent constraints on both parameters without additional priors or information that the paper does not specify. This makes the quoted individual uncertainties a constructed consequence of the assumed mapping rather than an independent prediction. The separate concern raised in the skeptic headline (Eqs. 2.4-2.5 imply Tdom≈2MN, which conflicts with Tf>Tdom and MN>Mχ for the plotted benchmarks) is a physical-consistency or correctness issue, not a circularity; it is noted but does not change the circularity verdict. Overall, the relic-density linkage adds real external content, but the central two-parameter measurement claim partially reduces to the input relation, giving a score of 6.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central forecast rests on a particular pre-BBN history: a long-lived particle N dominates the universe and decays into the SM and DM; DM freezes out earlier and is then diluted and replenished. The mapping from DM parameters to the GW suppression scale is fixed by Eq. (2.12), which imposes the observed Planck relic density. On top of this, the detectability numbers assume a blue-tilted tensor spectrum (n_T = 0.5) and the maximum allowed r = 0.036, with M_N = 10^5 GeV and T_RH = 10^11 GeV as fiducial values. These choices are not fitted to the GW spectrum, but they are hand-selected and not marginalized over.

free parameters (4)
  • Tensor-to-scalar ratio r = 0.036
    Fixed to the upper bound from Planck-18 plus BICEP/Keck to maximize the PGW amplitude; reducing it lowers all SNR and Fisher contours.
  • Tensor spectral index n_T = 0.5
    Chosen by hand as a blue-tilted benchmark. The central detectability disappears at n_T = 0 (Fig. 2 left panel), so this choice is load-bearing.
  • Long-lived particle mass M_N = 10^5 GeV
    Benchmark for all SNR and Fisher figures; varying M_N changes the EMD duration and the suppression scale.
  • Reheating temperature T_RH = 10^11 GeV
    Benchmark controlling the high-frequency suppression; not marginalized over in the forecasts.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption N initially thermalizes with the SM bath and becomes non-relativistic, then dominates the energy density before decaying.
    Sec. 2, first paragraph and footnote 1, with ref. [101]. Necessary for EMD to dilute and then replenish DM.
  • domain assumption DM freezes out before EMD onset (T_f > T_dom) and sigma_v > 3e-26 cm^3/s, so the EMD dilutes the thermal relic and N decay replenishes it.
    Sec. 2.2; central to Eq. (2.12) mapping DM parameters to T_dec.
  • domain assumption The PGW transfer functions T1, T2, T3 from Kuroyanagi et al. (ref. [137]) accurately describe mode re-entry through EMD, including entropy injection.
    Used in Eqs. (3.9)-(3.12); no re-derivation is given in this paper.
  • domain assumption The Gaussian Fisher approximation with N_b = 500 frequency bins and negligible confusion noise is valid for all forecast precision numbers.
    Sec. 4; all quoted uncertainties on M_chi and sigma_v depend on this approximation.
invented entities (1)
  • Long-lived SM-singlet particle N
    purpose: Drives early matter domination; decays into SM particles and DM, replenishing DM after dilution.
    Assumed from refs. [43,44]; no direct experimental evidence. The GW observable probes its decay temperature through Eq. (2.12).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Primordial Gravitational Waves as Complementary Probe of Dark Matter Indirect Detection." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/YX5XIVC6

@misc{pith2026250617568,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Primordial Gravitational Waves as Complementary Probe of Dark Matter Indirect Detection},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/YX5XIVC6}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.17568}
}
abstract

We propose a novel cosmological probe of dark matter (DM) through inflationary primordial gravitational wave (GW) measurements highlighting its complementarity with traditional indirect detection. In scenarios like early matter domination (EMD), the thermal DM relic is diluted and then replenished via non-thermal production, leaving characteristic imprints on the primordial GW spectrum, inducing frequency-dependent suppressions in the GW amplitudes. By analysing signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and employing Fisher forecast, we show that upcoming GW experiments have good potential to probe the DM parameter space involving its mass and annihilation cross-section. We show, for instance, LISA will be sensitive to DM mass range $[2\times 10^2-10^5]$ GeV. Furthermore, we identify a significant overlap of the GW missions' sensitivity reaches with the projected reach of future indirect searches like CTA with gamma rays, ANTARES, KM3NeT with neutrinos. In those overlapping regions of interests, we forecast on the GW experiments to estimate the precision of measurements. We show, for instance, that DM mass of $10^5$ GeV with an annihilation cross-section of $10^{-24}~{\rm cm}^3{\rm /s}$, and a mass of $10^4$ GeV with an annihilation cross-section of $2\times10^{-25}~{\rm cm}^3{\rm /s}$, lie within the projections of CTA. We find that whilst the former can be probed by ET with $\sim 1\%$ uncertainties, the latter can be probed by $\mu$-ARES with $\sim 7 \%$ uncertainties. Similarly, DM mass of $10^5$ GeV, with cross-section $10^{-23}~{\rm cm}^3{\rm /s}$ lies within the projection of ANTARES and KM3NeT, which can be probed by ET with $\sim 1\%$ uncertainties.

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

146 extracted references · 2 canonical work pages

  1. [11]

    Ghoshal, D

    A. Ghoshal, D. Paul and S. Pal,Primordial gravitational waves as probe of dark matter in interferometer missions: Fisher forecast and MCMC,JHEP12(2024) 150 [2405.06741]

    arXiv 2024

  2. [1]

    Brout, F

    R. Brout, F. Englert and E. Gunzig,The Creation of the Universe as a Quantum Phenomenon,Annals Phys.115(1978) 78

    1978

  3. [2]

    Sato,First Order Phase Transition of a Vacuum and Expansion of the Universe,Mon

    K. Sato,First Order Phase Transition of a Vacuum and Expansion of the Universe,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.195(1981) 467

    1981

  4. [3]

    Guth,The Inflationary Universe: A Possible Solution to the Horizon and Flatness Problems,Phys

    A.H. Guth,The Inflationary Universe: A Possible Solution to the Horizon and Flatness Problems,Phys. Rev. D23(1981) 347

    1981

  5. [4]

    Linde,A New Inflationary Universe Scenario: A Possible Solution of the Horizon, Flatness, Homogeneity, Isotropy and Primordial Monopole Problems,Phys

    A.D. Linde,A New Inflationary Universe Scenario: A Possible Solution of the Horizon, Flatness, Homogeneity, Isotropy and Primordial Monopole Problems,Phys. Lett. B108 (1982) 389

    1982

  6. [5]

    Starobinsky,Dynamics of Phase Transition in the New Inflationary Universe Scenario and Generation of Perturbations,Phys

    A.A. Starobinsky,Dynamics of Phase Transition in the New Inflationary Universe Scenario and Generation of Perturbations,Phys. Lett. B117(1982) 175. [6]Planckcollaboration,Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters,Astron. Astrophys. 641(2020) A6 [1807.06209]

    arXiv 1982

  7. [7]

    C. Chen, K. Dimopoulos, C. Eröncel and A. Ghoshal,Enhanced primordial gravitational waves from a stiff postinflationary era due to an oscillating inflaton,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 063554 [2405.01679]

    arXiv 2024

  8. [8]

    Bernal, A

    N. Bernal, A. Ghoshal, F. Hajkarim and G. Lambiase,Primordial Gravitational Wave Signals in Modified Cosmologies,JCAP11(2020) 051 [2008.04959]

    arXiv 2020

Show all 146 references
  1. [9]

    Ghoshal, Y

    A. Ghoshal, Y. Gouttenoire, L. Heurtier and P. Simakachorn,Primordial black hole archaeology with gravitational waves from cosmic strings,JHEP08(2023) 196 [2304.04793]. – 27 –

    2023 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Ghoshal, L

    A. Ghoshal, L. Heurtier and A. Paul,Signatures of non-thermal dark matter with kination and early matter domination. Gravitational waves versus laboratory searches,JHEP12(2022) 105 [2208.01670]

    2022 arXiv

  3. [12]

    Buchmuller, E

    W. Buchmuller, E. Dudas, L. Heurtier and C. Wieck,Large-Field Inflation and Supersymmetry Breaking,JHEP09(2014) 053 [1407.0253]

    2014 arXiv

  4. [13]

    Buchmuller, E

    W. Buchmuller, E. Dudas, L. Heurtier, A. Westphal, C. Wieck and M.W. Winkler,Challenges for Large-Field Inflation and Moduli Stabilization,JHEP04(2015) 058 [1501.05812]

    2015 arXiv

  5. [14]

    Argurio, D

    R. Argurio, D. Coone, L. Heurtier and A. Mariotti,Sgoldstino-less inflation and low energy SUSY breaking,JCAP07(2017) 047 [1705.06788]

    2017 arXiv

  6. [15]

    Heurtier and F

    L. Heurtier and F. Huang,Inflaton portal to a highly decoupled EeV dark matter particle, Phys. Rev. D100(2019) 043507 [1905.05191]

    2019 arXiv

  7. [16]

    Jungman, M

    G. Jungman, M. Kamionkowski and K. Griest,Supersymmetric dark matter,Phys. Rept.267 (1996) 195 [hep-ph/9506380]

    1996 arXiv

  8. [17]

    Bertone, D

    G. Bertone, D. Hooper and J. Silk,Particle dark matter: Evidence, candidates and constraints,Phys. Rept.405(2005) 279 [hep-ph/0404175]

    2005 arXiv

  9. [18]

    Feng,Dark Matter Candidates from Particle Physics and Methods of Detection,Ann

    J.L. Feng,Dark Matter Candidates from Particle Physics and Methods of Detection,Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys.48(2010) 495 [1003.0904]

    2010 arXiv

  10. [19]

    Lee and S

    B.W. Lee and S. Weinberg,Cosmological Lower Bound on Heavy Neutrino Masses,Phys. Rev. Lett.39(1977) 165

    1977

  11. [20]

    Scherrer and M.S

    R.J. Scherrer and M.S. Turner,On the Relic, Cosmic Abundance of Stable Weakly Interacting Massive Particles,Phys. Rev. D33(1986) 1585

    1986

  12. [21]

    Srednicki, R

    M. Srednicki, R. Watkins and K.A. Olive,Calculations of Relic Densities in the Early Universe,Nucl. Phys. B310(1988) 693

    1988

  13. [22]

    Gondolo and G

    P. Gondolo and G. Gelmini,Cosmic abundances of stable particles: Improved analysis,Nucl. Phys. B360(1991) 145. [23]PandaX-IIcollaboration,Dark Matter Results From 54-Ton-Day Exposure of PandaX-II Experiment,Phys. Rev. Lett.119(2017) 181302 [1708.06917]. [24]PandaXcollaboration...

    1991 arXiv

  14. [33]

    Gouttenoire,Beyond the Standard Model Cocktail, Springer Theses, Springer, Cham (2022), 10.1007/978-3-031-11862-3, [2207.01633]

    Y. Gouttenoire,Beyond the Standard Model Cocktail, Springer Theses, Springer, Cham (2022), 10.1007/978-3-031-11862-3, [2207.01633]

    2022 arXiv

  15. [34]

    McDonald,WIMP Densities in Decaying Particle Dominated Cosmology,Phys

    J. McDonald,WIMP Densities in Decaying Particle Dominated Cosmology,Phys. Rev. D43 (1991) 1063

    1991

  16. [35]

    Moroi and L

    T. Moroi and L. Randall,Wino cold dark matter from anomaly mediated SUSY breaking, Nucl. Phys. B570(2000) 455 [hep-ph/9906527]

    2000 arXiv

  17. [36]

    Visinelli and P

    L. Visinelli and P. Gondolo,Axion cold dark matter in non-standard cosmologies,Phys. Rev. D81(2010) 063508 [0912.0015]

    2010 arXiv

  18. [37]

    Erickcek,The Dark Matter Annihilation Boost from Low-Temperature Reheating,Phys

    A.L. Erickcek,The Dark Matter Annihilation Boost from Low-Temperature Reheating,Phys. Rev. D92(2015) 103505 [1504.03335]

    2015 arXiv

  19. [38]

    Nelson and H

    A.E. Nelson and H. Xiao,Axion Cosmology with Early Matter Domination,Phys. Rev. D98 (2018) 063516 [1807.07176]

    2018 arXiv

  20. [39]

    Cheek, J.K

    A. Cheek, J.K. Osiński and L. Roszkowski,Extending preferred axion models via heavy-quark induced early matter domination,JCAP03(2024) 061 [2310.16087]

    2024 arXiv

  21. [40]

    Cirelli, Y

    M. Cirelli, Y. Gouttenoire, K. Petraki and F. Sala,Homeopathic Dark Matter, or how diluted heavy substances produce high energy cosmic rays,JCAP02(2019) 014 [1811.03608]

    2019 arXiv

  22. [41]

    Gouttenoire, G

    Y. Gouttenoire, G. Servant and P. Simakachorn,BSM with Cosmic Strings: Heavy, up to EeV mass, Unstable Particles,JCAP07(2020) 016 [1912.03245]

    2020 arXiv

  23. [42]

    Allahverdi et al.,The First Three Seconds: a Review of Possible Expansion Histories of the Early Universe,2006.16182

    R. Allahverdi et al.,The First Three Seconds: a Review of Possible Expansion Histories of the Early Universe,2006.16182

    2006 arXiv

  24. [43]

    Allahverdi and J.K

    R. Allahverdi and J.K. Osiński,Early matter domination from long-lived particles in the visible sector,Phys. Rev. D105(2022) 023502 [2108.13136]

    2022 arXiv

  25. [44]

    Allahverdi, N.P.D

    R. Allahverdi, N.P.D. Loc and J.K. Osiński,Dark matter and baryogenesis from visible-sector long-lived particles,Phys. Rev. D107(2023) 123510 [2212.11303]

    2023 arXiv

  26. [45]

    Spokoiny,Deflationary universe scenario,Phys

    B. Spokoiny,Deflationary universe scenario,Phys. Lett. B315(1993) 40 [gr-qc/9306008]

    1993 arXiv

  27. [46]

    Joyce,Electroweak Baryogenesis and the Expansion Rate of the Universe,Phys

    M. Joyce,Electroweak Baryogenesis and the Expansion Rate of the Universe,Phys. Rev. D55 (1997) 1875 [hep-ph/9606223]

    1997 arXiv

  28. [47]

    Peebles and A

    P.J.E. Peebles and A. Vilenkin,Quintessential inflation,Phys. Rev. D59(1999) 063505 [astro-ph/9810509]

    1999 arXiv

  29. [48]

    Poulin, T.L

    V. Poulin, T.L. Smith, D. Grin, T. Karwal and M. Kamionkowski,Cosmological implications of ultralight axionlike fields,Phys. Rev. D98(2018) 083525 [1806.10608]

    2018 arXiv

  30. [49]

    Gouttenoire, G

    Y. Gouttenoire, G. Servant and P. Simakachorn,Kination cosmology from scalar fields and gravitational-wave signatures,2111.01150

    arXiv

  31. [50]

    Gouttenoire, G

    Y. Gouttenoire, G. Servant and P. Simakachorn,Revealing the Primordial Irreducible Inflationary Gravitational-Wave Background with a Spinning Peccei-Quinn Axion, 2108.10328

    arXiv

  32. [51]

    R.T. Co, D. Dunsky, N. Fernandez, A. Ghalsasi, L.J. Hall, K. Harigaya et al.,Gravitational wave and CMB probes of axion kination,JHEP09(2022) 116 [2108.09299]. – 29 –

    2022 arXiv

  33. [52]

    Heurtier, A

    L. Heurtier, A. Moursy and L. Wacquez,Cosmological imprints of SUSY breaking in models of sgoldstinoless non-oscillatory inflation,JCAP03(2023) 020 [2207.11502]

    2023 arXiv

  34. [53]

    C. Chen, S. Jyoti Das, K. Dimopoulos and A. Ghoshal,Flipped Rotating Axion Non-minimally Coupled to Gravity: Baryogenesis and Dark Matter,2502.08720

    arXiv

  35. [54]

    Guth and E.J

    A.H. Guth and E.J. Weinberg,A Cosmological Lower Bound on the Higgs Boson Mass,Phys. Rev. Lett.45(1980) 1131

    1980

  36. [55]

    Witten,Cosmological Consequences of a Light Higgs Boson,Nucl

    E. Witten,Cosmological Consequences of a Light Higgs Boson,Nucl. Phys. B177(1981) 477

    1981

  37. [56]

    Creminelli, A

    P. Creminelli, A. Nicolis and R. Rattazzi,Holography and the electroweak phase transition, JHEP03(2002) 051 [hep-th/0107141]

    2002 arXiv

  38. [57]

    Randall and G

    L. Randall and G. Servant,Gravitational waves from warped spacetime,JHEP05(2007) 054 [hep-ph/0607158]

    2007 arXiv

  39. [58]

    Konstandin and G

    T. Konstandin and G. Servant,Cosmological Consequences of Nearly Conformal Dynamics at the TeV scale,JCAP12(2011) 009 [1104.4791]

    2011 arXiv

  40. [59]

    Baratella, A

    P. Baratella, A. Pomarol and F. Rompineve,The Supercooled Universe,JHEP03(2019) 100 [1812.06996]

    2019 arXiv

  41. [60]

    Baldes, Y

    I. Baldes, Y. Gouttenoire and F. Sala,String Fragmentation in Supercooled Confinement and Implications for Dark Matter,JHEP04(2021) 278 [2007.08440]

    2021 arXiv

  42. [61]

    Baldes, Y

    I. Baldes, Y. Gouttenoire, F. Sala and G. Servant,Supercool composite Dark Matter beyond 100 TeV,JHEP07(2022) 084 [2110.13926]. [62]LIGO Scientific, Virgocollaboration,Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger,Phys. Rev. Lett.116(2016) 061102 [1602.038...

    2022 arXiv

  43. [64]

    Carilli and S

    C.L. Carilli and S. Rawlings,Science with the Square Kilometer Array: Motivation, key science projects, standards and assumptions,New Astron. Rev.48(2004) 979 [astro-ph/0409274]

    2004 arXiv

  44. [65]

    Janssen et al.,Gravitational wave astronomy with the SKA,PoSAASKA14(2015) 037 [1501.00127]

    G. Janssen et al.,Gravitational wave astronomy with the SKA,PoSAASKA14(2015) 037 [1501.00127]

    2015 arXiv

  45. [66]

    Weltman et al.,Fundamental physics with the Square Kilometre Array,Publ

    A. Weltman et al.,Fundamental physics with the Square Kilometre Array,Publ. Astron. Soc. Austral.37(2020) e002 [1810.02680]. [67]EPTAcollaboration,European Pulsar Timing Array Limits On An Isotropic Stochastic Gravitational-Wave Background,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.453(2015) ...

    2020 arXiv

  46. [71]

    Grishchuk,Amplification of gravitational waves in an istropic universe,Zh

    L.P. Grishchuk,Amplification of gravitational waves in an istropic universe,Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.67(1974) 825

    1974

  47. [72]

    Starobinsky,Spectrum of relict gravitational radiation and the early state of the universe, JETP Lett.30(1979) 682

    A.A. Starobinsky,Spectrum of relict gravitational radiation and the early state of the universe, JETP Lett.30(1979) 682. – 30 –

    1979

  48. [73]

    Rubakov, M.V

    V.A. Rubakov, M.V. Sazhin and A.V. Veryaskin,Graviton Creation in the Inflationary Universe and the Grand Unification Scale,Phys. Lett. B115(1982) 189

    1982

  49. [74]

    Guzzetti, N

    M.C. Guzzetti, N. Bartolo, M. Liguori and S. Matarrese,Gravitational waves from inflation, Riv. Nuovo Cim.39(2016) 399 [1605.01615]

    2016 arXiv

  50. [75]

    Seto and J

    N. Seto and J. Yokoyama,Probing the equation of state of the early universe with a space laser interferometer,J. Phys. Soc. Jap.72(2003) 3082 [gr-qc/0305096]

    2003 arXiv

  51. [76]

    Boyle and P.J

    L.A. Boyle and P.J. Steinhardt,Probing the early universe with inflationary gravitational waves,Phys. Rev. D77(2008) 063504 [astro-ph/0512014]

    2008 arXiv

  52. [77]

    Boyle and A

    L.A. Boyle and A. Buonanno,Relating gravitational wave constraints from primordial nucleosynthesis, pulsar timing, laser interferometers, and the CMB: Implications for the early Universe,Phys. Rev. D78(2008) 043531 [0708.2279]

    2008 arXiv

  53. [78]

    Kuroyanagi, T

    S. Kuroyanagi, T. Chiba and N. Sugiyama,Precision calculations of the gravitational wave background spectrum from inflation,Phys. Rev. D79(2009) 103501 [0804.3249]

    2009 arXiv

  54. [79]

    Nakayama and J

    K. Nakayama and J. Yokoyama,Gravitational Wave Background and Non-Gaussianity as a Probe of the Curvaton Scenario,JCAP01(2010) 010 [0910.0715]

    2010 arXiv

  55. [80]

    Kuroyanagi, C

    S. Kuroyanagi, C. Ringeval and T. Takahashi,Early universe tomography with CMB and gravitational waves,Phys. Rev. D87(2013) 083502 [1301.1778]

    2013 arXiv

  56. [81]

    Jinno, T

    R. Jinno, T. Moroi and K. Nakayama,Inflationary Gravitational Waves and the Evolution of the Early Universe,JCAP01(2014) 040 [1307.3010]

    2014 arXiv

  57. [82]

    Saikawa and S

    K. Saikawa and S. Shirai,Primordial gravitational waves, precisely: The role of thermodynamics in the Standard Model,JCAP05(2018) 035 [1803.01038]

    2018 arXiv

  58. [83]

    Nakayama, S

    K. Nakayama, S. Saito, Y. Suwa and J. Yokoyama,Space laser interferometers can determine the thermal history of the early Universe,Phys. Rev. D77(2008) 124001 [0802.2452]

    2008 arXiv

  59. [84]

    Nakayama, S

    K. Nakayama, S. Saito, Y. Suwa and J. Yokoyama,Probing reheating temperature of the universe with gravitational wave background,JCAP06(2008) 020 [0804.1827]

    2008 arXiv

  60. [85]

    Kuroyanagi, K

    S. Kuroyanagi, K. Nakayama and S. Saito,Prospects for determination of thermal history after inflation with future gravitational wave detectors,Phys. Rev. D84(2011) 123513 [1110.4169]

    2011 arXiv

  61. [86]

    Buchmüller, V

    W. Buchmüller, V. Domcke, K. Kamada and K. Schmitz,The Gravitational Wave Spectrum from CosmologicalB−LBreaking,JCAP10(2013) 003 [1305.3392]

    2013 arXiv

  62. [87]

    Buchmuller, V

    W. Buchmuller, V. Domcke, K. Kamada and K. Schmitz,A Minimal Supersymmetric Model of Particle Physics and the Early Universe,1309.7788

    arXiv

  63. [88]

    Jinno, T

    R. Jinno, T. Moroi and T. Takahashi,Studying Inflation with Future Space-Based Gravitational Wave Detectors,JCAP12(2014) 006 [1406.1666]

    2014 arXiv

  64. [89]

    Kuroyanagi, K

    S. Kuroyanagi, K. Nakayama and J. Yokoyama,Prospects of determination of reheating temperature after inflation by DECIGO,PTEP2015(2015) 013E02 [1410.6618]

    2015 arXiv

  65. [90]

    Maity and M.R

    S. Maity and M.R. Haque,Probing the early universe with future GW observatories, 2407.18246

    arXiv

  66. [91]

    Haque, D

    M.R. Haque, D. Maity, T. Paul and L. Sriramkumar,Decoding the phases of early and late time reheating through imprints on primordial gravitational waves,Physical Review D104 (2021)

    2021

  67. [92]

    Chakraborty, M.R

    A. Chakraborty, M.R. Haque, D. Maity and R. Mondal,Inflaton phenomenology via reheating in light of primordial gravitational waves and the latest BICEP/Keck data,Phys. Rev. D108 (2023) 023515 [2304.13637]

    2023 arXiv

  68. [93]

    Berbig and A

    M. Berbig and A. Ghoshal,Impact of high-scale Seesaw and Leptogenesis on inflationary tensor perturbations as detectable gravitational waves,JHEP05(2023) 172 [2301.05672]. – 31 –

    2023 arXiv

  69. [94]

    Borboruah, A

    Z.A. Borboruah, A. Ghoshal, L. Malhotra and U. Yajnik,Inflationary Gravitational Wave Spectral Shapes as test for Low-Scale Leptogenesis,2405.06603

  70. [95]

    Cheek, A

    A. Cheek, A. Ghoshal and D. Paul,Axion Dark Matter Archaeology with Primordial Gravitational Waves,2505.04614

  71. [96]

    Borboruah, A

    Z.A. Borboruah, A. Ghoshal and S. Ipek,Probing flavor violation and baryogenesis via primordial gravitational waves,JHEP07(2024) 228 [2405.03241]

    2024 arXiv

  72. [97]

    Datta and R

    S. Datta and R. Samanta,Gravitational waves-tomography of Low-Scale-Leptogenesis,JHEP 11(2022) 159 [2208.09949]

    2022 arXiv

  73. [98]

    Datta and R

    S. Datta and R. Samanta,Fingerprints of GeV scale right-handed neutrinos on inflationary gravitational waves and PTA data,Phys. Rev. D108(2023) L091706 [2307.00646]

    2023 arXiv

  74. [99]

    Chianese, S

    M. Chianese, S. Datta, R. Samanta and N. Saviano,Tomography of flavoured leptogenesis with primordial blue gravitational waves,JCAP11(2024) 051 [2405.00641]

    2024 arXiv

  75. [100]

    Datta, A

    S. Datta, A. Ghosal, A. Ghoshal and G. White,Complementarity between Cosmic String Gravitational Waves and long lived particle searches in laboratory,2501.03326

  76. [101]

    Borboruah, L

    Z.A. Borboruah, L. Malhotra, F.F. Deppisch and A. Ghoshal,Inflationary Gravitational Waves and Laboratory Searches as Complementary Probes of Right-handed Neutrinos, 2504.15374

    arXiv

  77. [102]

    Dutta, L

    B. Dutta, L. Leblond and K. Sinha,Mirage in the Sky: Non-thermal Dark Matter, Gravitino Problem, and Cosmic Ray Anomalies,Phys. Rev. D80(2009) 035014 [0904.3773]

    2009 arXiv

  78. [103]

    Acharya, G

    B.S. Acharya, G. Kane, S. Watson and P. Kumar,A Non-thermal WIMP Miracle,Phys. Rev. D80(2009) 083529 [0908.2430]

    2009 arXiv

  79. [104]

    Baumann, P.J

    D. Baumann, P.J. Steinhardt, K. Takahashi and K. Ichiki,Gravitational Wave Spectrum Induced by Primordial Scalar Perturbations,Phys. Rev. D76(2007) 084019 [hep-th/0703290]

    2007 arXiv

  80. [105]

    Kohri and T

    K. Kohri and T. Terada,Semianalytic calculation of gravitational wave spectrum nonlinearly induced from primordial curvature perturbations,Phys. Rev. D97(2018) 123532 [1804.08577]

    2018 arXiv

  81. [106]

    Bhaumik, T

    A. Bhaumik, T. Papanikolaou and A. Ghoshal,Vector induced Gravitational Waves sourced by Primordial Magnetic Fields,2504.10477. [107]Planckcollaboration,Planck 2018 results. X. Constraints on inflation,Astron. Astrophys. 641(2020) A10 [1807.06211]. [108]BICEP, Keckcollaboratio...

    2020 arXiv

  82. [110]

    Liddle and D.H

    A.R. Liddle and D.H. Lyth,The Cold dark matter density perturbation,Phys. Rept.231 (1993) 1 [astro-ph/9303019]

    1993 arXiv

  83. [111]

    Brandenberger, A

    R.H. Brandenberger, A. Nayeri, S.P. Patil and C. Vafa,Tensor Modes from a Primordial Hagedorn Phase of String Cosmology,Phys. Rev. Lett.98(2007) 231302 [hep-th/0604126]

    2007 arXiv

  84. [112]

    Calcagni, S

    G. Calcagni, S. Kuroyanagi, J. Ohashi and S. Tsujikawa,Strong Planck constraints on braneworld and non-commutative inflation,JCAP03(2014) 052 [1310.5186]

    2014 arXiv

  85. [113]

    Fujita, S

    T. Fujita, S. Kuroyanagi, S. Mizuno and S. Mukohyama,Blue-tilted Primordial Gravitational Waves from Massive Gravity,Phys. Lett. B789(2019) 215 [1808.02381]. – 32 –

    2019 arXiv

  86. [114]

    Cook and L

    J.L. Cook and L. Sorbo,Particle production during inflation and gravitational waves detectable by ground-based interferometers,Phys. Rev. D85(2012) 023534 [1109.0022]

    2012 arXiv

  87. [115]

    Mukohyama, R

    S. Mukohyama, R. Namba, M. Peloso and G. Shiu,Blue Tensor Spectrum from Particle Production during Inflation,JCAP08(2014) 036 [1405.0346]

    2014 arXiv

  88. [116]

    Baldi, F

    M. Baldi, F. Finelli and S. Matarrese,Inflation with violation of the null energy condition, Phys. Rev. D72(2005) 083504 [astro-ph/0505552]

    2005 arXiv

  89. [117]

    Kobayashi, M

    T. Kobayashi, M. Yamaguchi and J. Yokoyama,G-inflation: Inflation driven by the Galileon field,Phys. Rev. Lett.105(2010) 231302 [1008.0603]

    2010 arXiv

  90. [118]

    Anber and L

    M.M. Anber and L. Sorbo,Naturally inflating on steep potentials through electromagnetic dissipation,Phys. Rev. D81(2010) 043534 [0908.4089]

    2010 arXiv

  91. [119]

    Adshead, E

    P. Adshead, E. Martinec, E.I. Sfakianakis and M. Wyman,Higgsed Chromo-Natural Inflation, JHEP12(2016) 137 [1609.04025]

    2016 arXiv

  92. [120]

    Adshead and E.I

    P. Adshead and E.I. Sfakianakis,Higgsed Gauge-flation,JHEP08(2017) 130 [1705.03024]

    2017 arXiv

  93. [121]

    Caldwell and C

    R.R. Caldwell and C. Devulder,Axion Gauge Field Inflation and Gravitational Leptogenesis: A Lower Bound on B Modes from the Matter-Antimatter Asymmetry of the Universe,Phys. Rev. D97(2018) 023532 [1706.03765]

    2018 arXiv

  94. [122]

    Dimastrogiovanni, M

    E. Dimastrogiovanni, M. Fasiello, R.J. Hardwick, H. Assadullahi, K. Koyama and D. Wands, Non-Gaussianity from Axion-Gauge Fields Interactions during Inflation,JCAP11(2018) 029 [1806.05474]

    2018 arXiv

  95. [123]

    Oikonomou,A refined Einstein–Gauss–Bonnet inflationary theoretical framework,Class

    V.K. Oikonomou,A refined Einstein–Gauss–Bonnet inflationary theoretical framework,Class. Quant. Grav.38(2021) 195025 [2108.10460]

    2021 arXiv

  96. [124]

    Kuroyanagi, T

    S. Kuroyanagi, T. Takahashi and S. Yokoyama,Blue-tilted inflationary tensor spectrum and reheating in the light of NANOGrav results,JCAP01(2021) 071 [2011.03323]

    2021 arXiv

  97. [125]

    Maggiore,Gravitational wave experiments and early universe cosmology,Phys

    M. Maggiore,Gravitational wave experiments and early universe cosmology,Phys. Rept.331 (2000) 283 [gr-qc/9909001]

    2000 arXiv

  98. [126]

    Cyburt, B.D

    R.H. Cyburt, B.D. Fields, K.A. Olive and T.-H. Yeh,Big Bang Nucleosynthesis: 2015,Rev. Mod. Phys.88(2016) 015004 [1505.01076]. [127]COREcollaboration,Exploring cosmic origins with CORE: Survey requirements and mission design,JCAP04(2018) 014 [1706.04516]. [128]SPT-3Gcollaborat...

    2016 arXiv

  99. [130]

    Abazajian et al.,CMB-S4 Science Case, Reference Design, and Project Plan,1907.04473

    K. Abazajian et al.,CMB-S4 Science Case, Reference Design, and Project Plan,1907.04473. [131]Topical Conveners: K.N. Abazajian, J.E. Carlstrom, A.T. Leecollaboration, Neutrino Physics from the Cosmic Microwave Background and Large Scale Structure, Astropart. Phys.63(2015) 66 [...

    2015 arXiv

  100. [135]

    Turner, M.J

    M.S. Turner, M.J. White and J.E. Lidsey,Tensor perturbations in inflationary models as a probe of cosmology,Phys. Rev. D48(1993) 4613 [astro-ph/9306029]. – 33 –

    1993 arXiv

  101. [136]

    Chongchitnan and G

    S. Chongchitnan and G. Efstathiou,Prospects for direct detection of primordial gravitational waves,Phys. Rev. D73(2006) 083511 [astro-ph/0602594]

    2006 arXiv

  102. [137]

    Kuroyanagi, T

    S. Kuroyanagi, T. Takahashi and S. Yokoyama,Blue-tilted Tensor Spectrum and Thermal History of the Universe,JCAP02(2015) 003 [1407.4785]. [138]LIGO Scientific, VIRGOcollaboration,GW170104: Observation of a 50-Solar-Mass Binary Black Hole Coalescence at Redshift 0.2,Phys. Rev. ...

    2015 arXiv

  103. [144]

    F.A.e.a. M. Punturo, M. Abernathy,The einstein telescope: a third-generation gravitational wave observatory,Classical and Quantum Gravity27(2010) 194002

    2010

  104. [145]

    Hild et al.,Sensitivity Studies for Third-Generation Gravitational Wave Observatories, Class

    S. Hild et al.,Sensitivity Studies for Third-Generation Gravitational Wave Observatories, Class. Quant. Grav.28(2011) 094013 [1012.0908]

    2011 arXiv

  105. [146]

    Reitze et al.,Cosmic Explorer: The U.S

    D. Reitze et al.,Cosmic Explorer: The U.S. Contribution to Gravitational-Wave Astronomy beyond LIGO,Bull. Am. Astron. Soc.51(2019) 035 [1907.04833]

    2019 arXiv

  106. [147]

    Sesana et al.,Unveiling the gravitational universe atµ-Hz frequencies,Exper

    A. Sesana et al.,Unveiling the gravitational universe atµ-Hz frequencies,Exper. Astron.51 (2021) 1333 [1908.11391]

    2021 arXiv

  107. [148]

    Amaro-Seoane, H

    P. Amaro-Seoane, H. Audley and S.B. et al.,Laser interferometer space antenna, 2017

    2017

  108. [149]

    Baker et al.,The Laser Interferometer Space Antenna: Unveiling the Millihertz Gravitational Wave Sky,1907.06482

    J. Baker et al.,The Laser Interferometer Space Antenna: Unveiling the Millihertz Gravitational Wave Sky,1907.06482

    1907 arXiv

  109. [150]

    Corbin and N.J

    V. Corbin and N.J. Cornish,Detecting the cosmic gravitational wave background with the big bang observer,Class. Quant. Grav.23(2006) 2435 [gr-qc/0512039]

    2006 arXiv

  110. [151]

    Harry, P

    G.M. Harry, P. Fritschel, D.A. Shaddock, W. Folkner and E.S. Phinney,Laser interferometry for the big bang observer,Classical and Quantum Gravity23(2006) 4887

    2006

  111. [152]

    K. Yagi, N. Tanahashi and T. Tanaka,Probing the size of extra dimension with gravitational wave astronomy,Phys. Rev. D83(2011) 084036 [1101.4997]

    2011 arXiv

  112. [153]

    N. Seto, S. Kawamura and T. Nakamura,Possibility of direct measurement of the acceleration of the universe using 0.1-Hz band laser interferometer gravitational wave antenna in space, Phys. Rev. Lett.87(2001) 221103 [astro-ph/0108011]

    2001 arXiv

  113. [154]

    Kawamura, T

    S. Kawamura, T. Nakamura and M.A. et al.,The japanese space gravitational wave antenna—decigo,Classical and Quantum Gravity23(2006) S125

    2006

  114. [155]

    Yagi and N

    K. Yagi and N. Seto,Detector configuration of DECIGO/BBO and identification of cosmological neutron-star binaries,Phys. Rev. D83(2011) 044011 [1101.3940]. [156]EPTAcollaboration,The European Pulsar Timing Array and the Large European Array for Pulsars,Class. Quant. Grav.30(201...

    2011 arXiv

  115. [157]

    Lentati et al.,European Pulsar Timing Array Limits On An Isotropic Stochastic Gravitational-Wave Background,Mon

    L. Lentati et al.,European Pulsar Timing Array Limits On An Isotropic Stochastic Gravitational-Wave Background,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.453(2015) 2576 [1504.03692]

    2015 arXiv

  116. [158]

    Babak et al.,European Pulsar Timing Array Limits on Continuous Gravitational Waves from Individual Supermassive Black Hole Binaries,Mon

    S. Babak et al.,European Pulsar Timing Array Limits on Continuous Gravitational Waves from Individual Supermassive Black Hole Binaries,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.455(2016) 1665 [1509.02165]

    2016 arXiv

  117. [159]

    McLaughlin,The North American Nanohertz Observatory for Gravitational Waves, Class

    M.A. McLaughlin,The North American Nanohertz Observatory for Gravitational Waves, Class. Quant. Grav.30(2013) 224008 [1310.0758]. [160]NANOGRA Vcollaboration,The NANOGrav 11-year Data Set: Pulsar-timing Constraints On The Stochastic Gravitational-wave Background,Astrophys. J.8...

    2013 arXiv

  118. [161]

    Aggarwal et al.,The NANOGrav 11-Year Data Set: Limits on Gravitational Waves from Individual Supermassive Black Hole Binaries,Astrophys

    K. Aggarwal et al.,The NANOGrav 11-Year Data Set: Limits on Gravitational Waves from Individual Supermassive Black Hole Binaries,Astrophys. J.880(2019) 2 [1812.11585]

    2019 arXiv

  119. [162]

    Brazier et al.,The NANOGrav Program for Gravitational Waves and Fundamental Physics,1908.05356

    A. Brazier et al.,The NANOGrav Program for Gravitational Waves and Fundamental Physics,1908.05356. [163]NANOGra vcollaboration,The NANOGrav 12.5 yr Data Set: Search for an Isotropic Stochastic Gravitational-wave Background,Astrophys. J. Lett.905(2020) L34 [2009.04496]

    2020 arXiv

  120. [164]

    Thrane and J.D

    E. Thrane and J.D. Romano,Sensitivity curves for searches for gravitational-wave backgrounds,Phys. Rev. D88(2013) 124032 [1310.5300]

    2013 arXiv

  121. [165]

    Caprini et al.,Science with the space-based interferometer eLISA

    C. Caprini et al.,Science with the space-based interferometer eLISA. II: Gravitational waves from cosmological phase transitions,JCAP04(2016) 001 [1512.06239]

    2016 arXiv

  122. [166]

    Gowling and M

    C. Gowling and M. Hindmarsh,Observational prospects for phase transitions at LISA: Fisher matrix analysis,JCAP10(2021) 039 [2106.05984]

    2021 arXiv

  123. [167]

    Dodelson,Modern Cosmology, Academic Press, Amsterdam (2003)

    S. Dodelson,Modern Cosmology, Academic Press, Amsterdam (2003)

    2003

  124. [168]

    Bertone et al.,Gravitational wave probes of dark matter: challenges and opportunities, SciPost Phys

    G. Bertone et al.,Gravitational wave probes of dark matter: challenges and opportunities, SciPost Phys. Core3(2020) 007 [1907.10610]

    2020 arXiv

  125. [169]

    Miller,Gravitational wave probes of particle dark matter: a review,2503.02607

    A.L. Miller,Gravitational wave probes of particle dark matter: a review,2503.02607. [170]H.E.S.S.collaboration,Search for dark matter annihilation in the Wolf-Lundmark-Melotte dwarf irregular galaxy with H.E.S.S.,Phys. Rev. D103(2021) 102002 [2105.04325]. [171]H.E.S.S.collabor...

    2021

  126. [176]

    Aleksić et al.,Optimized dark matter searches in deep observations of Segue 1 with MAGIC, JCAP02(2014) 008 [1312.1535]

    J. Aleksić et al.,Optimized dark matter searches in deep observations of Segue 1 with MAGIC, JCAP02(2014) 008 [1312.1535]. [177]HA WCcollaboration,Search for Dark Matter Gamma-ray Emission from the Andromeda Galaxy with the High-Altitude Water Cherenkov Observatory,JCAP06(2018...

    2014 arXiv

  127. [180]

    Thorpe-Morgan, D

    C. Thorpe-Morgan, D. Malyshev, C.-A. Stegen, A. Santangelo and J. Jochum,Annihilating dark matter search with 12 yr of Fermi LAT data in nearby galaxy clusters,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.502(2021) 4039 [2010.11006]

    2021 arXiv

  128. [181]

    S. Hoof, A. Geringer-Sameth and R. Trotta,A Global Analysis of Dark Matter Signals from 27 Dwarf Spheroidal Galaxies using 11 Years of Fermi-LAT Observations,JCAP02(2020) 012 [1812.06986]. [182]Fermi-LAT, DEScollaboration,Searching for Dark Matter Annihilation in Recently Disc...

    2020 arXiv

  129. [187]

    Albert et al.,Results from the search for dark matter in the Milky Way with 9 years of data of the ANTARES neutrino telescope,Phys

    A. Albert et al.,Results from the search for dark matter in the Milky Way with 9 years of data of the ANTARES neutrino telescope,Phys. Lett. B769(2017) 249 [1612.04595]. [188]KM3NeTcollaboration,First searches for dark matter with the KM3NeT neutrino telescopes,JCAP03(2025) 05...

    2017 arXiv

  130. [189]

    IceCube Collaboration,Search for neutrino lines from dark matter annihilation and decay with IceCube,Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 102004 [2303.13663]

    2023

  131. [190]

    IceCube Collaboration,Search for neutrinos from dark matter self-annihilations in the center of the Milky Way with 3 years of IceCube/DeepCore: IceCube Collaboration,Eur. Phys. J. C 77(2017) 627 [1705.08103]. [191]Super-Kamiokandecollaboration,Indirect search for dark matter f...

    2017 arXiv

  132. [193]

    Dasgupta, P.S.B

    A. Dasgupta, P.S.B. Dev, A. Ghoshal and A. Mazumdar,Gravitational wave pathway to testable leptogenesis,Phys. Rev. D106(2022) 075027 [2206.07032]

    2022 arXiv

  133. [194]

    Bhaumik, A

    N. Bhaumik, A. Ghoshal and M. Lewicki,Doubly peaked induced stochastic gravitational wave background: testing baryogenesis from primordial black holes,JHEP07(2022) 130 [2205.06260]

    2022 arXiv

  134. [195]

    Barman, D

    B. Barman, D. Borah, A. Dasgupta and A. Ghoshal,Probing high scale Dirac leptogenesis via gravitational waves from domain walls,Phys. Rev. D106(2022) 015007 [2205.03422]

    2022 arXiv

  135. [196]

    Ghoshal and P

    A. Ghoshal and P. Saha,Detectable gravitational waves from preheating probes nonthermal dark matter,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 023526 [2203.14424]. – 36 –

    2024 arXiv

  136. [197]

    Dunsky, A

    D.I. Dunsky, A. Ghoshal, H. Murayama, Y. Sakakihara and G. White,GUTs, hybrid topological defects, and gravitational waves,Phys. Rev. D106(2022) 075030 [2111.08750]

    2022 arXiv

  137. [198]

    Ghoshal and A

    A. Ghoshal and A. Salvio,Gravitational waves from fundamental axion dynamics,JHEP12 (2020) 049 [2007.00005]

    2020 arXiv

  138. [199]

    Chowdhury, G

    D. Chowdhury, G. Tasinato and I. Zavala,Response of the Einstein Telescope to Doppler anisotropies,Phys. Rev. D107(2023) 083516 [2209.05770]. – 37 –

    2023 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.