Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Oblivious Deletion Codes

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2506.18878 v1 pith:T6VAMTNN submitted 2025-06-23 cs.IT cs.CCmath.IT

Oblivious Deletion Codes

classification cs.IT cs.CCmath.IT
keywords obliviousadversarialcodesredundancydeletiondeletionsexistentialexplicit
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

We construct deletion error-correcting codes in the oblivious model, where errors are adversarial but oblivious to the encoder's randomness. Oblivious errors bridge the gap between the adversarial and random error models, and are motivated by applications like DNA storage, where the noise is caused by hard-to-model physical phenomena, but not by an adversary. (1) (Explicit oblivious) We construct $t$ oblivious deletion codes, with redundancy $\sim 2t\log n$, matching the existential bound for adversarial deletions. (2) (List decoding implies explicit oblivious) We show that explicit list-decodable codes yield explicit oblivious deletion codes with essentially the same parameters. By a work of Guruswami and H\r{a}stad (IEEE TIT, 2021), this gives 2 oblivious deletion codes with redundancy $\sim 3\log n$, beating the existential redundancy for 2 adversarial deletions. (3) (Randomized oblivious) We give a randomized construction of oblivious codes that, with probability at least $1-2^{-n}$, produces a code correcting $t$ oblivious deletions with redundancy $\sim(t+1)\log n$, beating the existential adversarial redundancy of $\sim 2t\log n$. (4) (Randomized adversarial) Studying the oblivious model can inform better constructions of adversarial codes. The same technique produces, with probability at least $1-2^{-n}$, a code correcting $t$ adversarial deletions with redundancy $\sim (2t+1)\log n$, nearly matching the existential redundancy of $\sim 2t\log n$. The common idea behind these results is to reduce the hash size by modding by a prime chosen (randomly) from a small subset, and including a small encoding of the prime in the hash.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.