Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

MuBench: Assessment of Multilingual Capabilities of Large Language Models Across 61 Languages

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2506.19468 v1 pith:QAHSTOLX submitted 2025-06-24 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords languagemultilinguallanguagesmodelscapabilitiesmubenchalignmentcoverage
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Multilingual large language models (LLMs) are advancing rapidly, with new models frequently claiming support for an increasing number of languages. However, existing evaluation datasets are limited and lack cross-lingual alignment, leaving assessments of multilingual capabilities fragmented in both language and skill coverage. To address this, we introduce MuBench, a benchmark covering 61 languages and evaluating a broad range of capabilities. We evaluate several state-of-the-art multilingual LLMs and find notable gaps between claimed and actual language coverage, particularly a persistent performance disparity between English and low-resource languages. Leveraging MuBench's alignment, we propose Multilingual Consistency (MLC) as a complementary metric to accuracy for analyzing performance bottlenecks and guiding model improvement. Finally, we pretrain a suite of 1.2B-parameter models on English and Chinese with 500B tokens, varying language ratios and parallel data proportions to investigate cross-lingual transfer dynamics.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Language Equality has a Price: A Systematic Investigation of Multi-turn LLM Performance for EU-24+

    cs.CL 2026-08 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Across 30 languages, commercial LLMs outscore all open-weight models in every EU language, and non-English service costs more and scores lower, suggesting equality requires resources beyond public web crawls.

Pith tools