Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 44 references

Many phases in a hairy box in three dimensions

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that the three-dimensional Einstein-Maxwell-scalar system in a finite Dirichlet box has five Euclidean saddle families — empty, bag-of-gold, hairy bag-of-gold, boson star, and boson star-Python's-lunch — rather than the…

desk verdict Genuinely new saddle families and an honest correction of an earlier error, but the boson star-PL branch needs numerical back-up before the 'many phases' claim is solid. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.20528 v1 pith:OUV3ZFHN submitted 2025-06-25 gr-qc hep-th

Shoichiro Miyashita This is my paper · ORCID
classification gr-qchep-th
keywords Einstein-Maxwell-scalarsystemthree-dimensionalgravitybagofgoldsaddlebosonstarDirichletboundaryconditionsEuclideanquantumgravitationalthermodynamicsphasetransitions
topics Quantum Gravity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper argues that gravitational thermodynamics in three dimensions with a finite Dirichlet box is as rich as in higher dimensions, despite the absence of black holes. It claims that, on top of the empty (flat-space) and boson star saddles, three further saddle families exist: the bag-of-gold (BG) saddle, its hairy generalization, and a configuration called the boson star-PL (Python's-lunch) saddle. If correct, the phase diagram contains thermal phase transitions between empty, BG, hairy BG, boson star, and boson star-PL phases, with the BG and its hairy version playing the role that black holes play in anti-de Sitter space. The reason to care is that earlier work concluded the phase structure was trivial, whereas this paper says it is not.

What carries the argument

The central object is the Euclidean saddle itself, classified by the position of the bolt (the fixed point of the Euclidean time circle) relative to the Dirichlet boundary at $r = r_b$. In ordinary black-hole saddles the bolt lies inside the box; in BG saddles it lies outside; in boson star-PL saddles the metric function $f(r)$ vanishes at a maximum radius $r_{\max}$ where the coordinate system breaks down, and the geometry is continued beyond $r_{\max}$ by a second coordinate patch with the expansions (4.6)–(4.13). The argument is carried by shooting from the center or horizon with two free parameters ($a_0, \phi_0$) or ($a_{G1}, \phi_{G0}$), imposing the boundary condition $\phi(r_b) = 0$, and using the one-parameter solution curves so obtained to compute on-shell free energies and identify dominant saddles.

What would settle it

Integrate the full field equations (2.5)–(2.8) for a claimed boson star-PL solution using an independent high-precision method, such as spectral collocation, across $r = r_{\max}$, and verify that the patched fields satisfy the equations to machine precision and that the metric is smooth with all curvature invariants finite; if the residuals do not vanish, or if the zigzag persists as resolution increases, the boson star-PL family is a numerical artifact rather than a true saddle.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the Euclidean Einstein-Maxwell-scalar system in three dimensions without a cosmological constant, enclosed in a finite Dirichlet box, admits at least five families of saddle-point solutions, not the two (empty and boson star) identified in prior work. The three additional saddles are: the bag-of-gold (BG) saddle, whose bolt lies outside the box and whose horizon area exceeds the boundary area; the hairy BG saddle, which adds a charged scalar condensate outside the box; and the boson star-PL saddle, a two-coordinate-patch geometry in which the radial coordinate reaches a maximum radius $r_{\max}$ beyond the boundary, at which point the metric is regular and can be continued back to the boundary. The paper argues that these saddles produce a phase diagram with first- and second-order transitions, including situations where the boson star-PL and hairy BG phases dominate, and that the structure closely parallels higher-dimensional holographic superconductors.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the numerical shooting solutions, especially the boson star-PL saddle, are genuine smooth saddle points of the Euclidean action: the construction patches two coordinate charts at $r = r_{\max}$ using low-order expansions and a figure, with no convergence tests, residual checks, or independent confirmation, and the paper itself notes a numerical zigzag at the junction.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The previously claimed simplicity of the three-dimensional EMS phase diagram is wrong; the full diagram includes BG, hairy BG, and boson star-PL phases in the high-chemical-potential, low-temperature region.
  • The BG and hairy BG saddles provide a finite-entropy, horizon-like high-temperature phase in a system with no black holes, so thermal phase transitions occur without black holes.
  • The boson star-PL saddle shows that Python's-Lunch-type geometries, with a bulge beyond the boundary, can be the dominant Euclidean saddles, so such geometries must be included in Dirichlet-box gravitational path integral computations.
  • The phase diagrams match qualitatively those of holographic superconductors, suggesting that the three-dimensional Dirichlet-box EMS system is a toy model for holographic superconductivity without an AdS boundary.
  • For sufficiently small scalar coupling $q$, the ordinary boson star is never thermodynamically stable and the boson star-PL phase replaces it, so the stability of solitonic phases depends on $q$ in a way not previously recognized.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A direct numerical search in the four-dimensional Einstein-Maxwell or Einstein-Maxwell-scalar system with a Dirichlet box should also find bulge-type saddles analogous to the boson star-PL branch; the paper only speculates about higher dimensions.
  • The zero-loop heat capacity of BG saddles vanishes, and the paper assumes one-loop corrections make it positive; this assumption can be tested by computing the one-loop determinant, and a negative result would remove the thermodynamic interpretation offered.
  • The reported numerical zigzag at the junction of the boson star and boson star-PL curves suggests the two families may be connected by a near-crossing of solution branches rather than a smooth merger; a careful continuation in the shooting parameters could reveal an additional saddle or a change in transition order.
  • The claimed threshold $q \simeq 2.625\sqrt{G}/r_b$ for boson star stability, which corrects an earlier value of about $3.5$, should be verifiable by an independent grid search in $(a_0, \phi_0)$ with higher shooting precision, since the endpoint region is numerically delicate.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies Euclidean Einstein-Maxwell-scalar (EMS) theory in three dimensions with a Dirichlet box boundary and no cosmological constant. It claims that, in addition to the known empty and boson-star saddles, the system admits three further Euclidean saddle families: the bag-of-gold (BG) saddle, a hairy generalization of it, and a configuration dubbed the 'boson star-PL' saddle. For q=0 the paper reviews and corrects the thermodynamics of the EM system of Ref. [31]. For finite coupling q it constructs the new saddles by numerical shooting, computes their free energies, and presents phase diagrams in the (T,mu) plane. The central thesis is that the phase structure is as rich as the higher-dimensional AdS cases, with transitions among empty, BG, hairy BG, boson-star, and boson-star-PL phases.

Significance. If the numerical solutions are genuine saddle points, the paper corrects the earlier conclusion of Ref. [33] that the 3D EMS box has only empty and boson-star saddles, and it establishes a concrete low-dimensional realization of bag-of-gold and Python's-lunch-like geometries in gravitational thermodynamics. The explicit expansions (4.1)-(4.17) and the observation of a rescaling symmetry in three dimensions (footnote 12) are useful contributions. The author is also commendably candid about numerical difficulties, including the unresolved low-temperature hairy-BG branch and the acknowledged numerical zigzag in the boson-star-PL branch. However, the central existence claims rest on numerical shooting without code, data, residual checks, or convergence tests, and the boson-star-PL patching is demonstrated only to leading order; these are load-bearing gaps for the paper's main message.

major comments (4)
  1. [4.1.2, Eqs. (4.6)-(4.13)] The boson-star-PL saddle is constructed by patching two coordinate charts at r=rmax, but only the leading terms of the expansions are given. The paper does not demonstrate that the full metric and matter fields solve the equations of motion across the seam, nor that the induced metric and extrinsic curvature match there. Without such a junction-condition check, a delta-function (thin-shell) source at r=rmax cannot be excluded, which would make the configuration a solution with a brane source rather than a saddle of the original action. Because the free-energy comparison in Sec. 4.2 and the phase diagram in Figure 10 include this family, the existence of the fifth saddle family is not yet established.
  2. [4.1.1-4.1.2, Figs. 3-5] The numerical construction of the boson-star and boson-star-PL families is presented without convergence tests, residual checks, error bars, or code/data availability. The caption of Figure 5 reports 'a small zigzag shape in the boson star-PL branch near the junction' and attributes it to 'a lack of numerical accuracy', while Sec. 4.1.1 notes that 'numerically determining the exact location of the endpoint is a somewhat difficult task'. Since the existence of the new saddle families is the central claim of the paper, these numerical solutions need to be supported by explicit accuracy measures, such as mesh-refinement convergence of the shooting parameters and residual norms of the ODE system.
  3. [4.2, Figs. 9-10] The low-temperature behavior of hairy BG saddles is left unresolved: the author states 'I could not obtain the hairy BG solutions near zero temperature' and the corresponding branches are drawn as dotted curves. Consequently, the phase boundary between the boson-star-PL phase and the hairy BG phase is undetermined in the low-T/high-mu region, and the speculation about a possible 'zero temperature hairy BG' is unsupported. The claim that the system has 'many phases' with a phase diagram similar to higher-dimensional cases is therefore incomplete in the region where the new hairy phase is expected to dominate.
  4. [3.2] The thermodynamic stability analysis relies on the assumption that one-loop corrections make the heat capacity of the BG saddle nonnegative, as stated: 'I assume this to be true'. At zero loop, the heat capacity of the BG saddle is exactly zero, so the identification of stable phases and the Hawking-Page-type transition temperature in Sec. 3.2 and Fig. 2 depend on this unproven assumption. This should be flagged explicitly as an assumption in the conclusions so that the phase diagrams of Fig. 10 are not overinterpreted as established zero-loop results.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Figure 6 caption] The caption lists the parameter values as '√Gq = 1.2 for (right), √Gq = 0.6 for (middle), and √Gq = 0.3 for (right)'; this should presumably read '1.2 for (left)' and '0.3 for (right)'.
  2. [Figure 10 caption] Both panels of Figure 10 are labelled '(left)' in the caption; the second should be '(right)'.
  3. [4.1.2] The expression 'q /greaterorsimilar2.625 √G/rb' contains a LaTeX artifact; it should read 'q \gtrsim 2.625√G/rb'.
  4. [2] The classification 'nr > 0' and 'nr < 0' for the two classes of saddles uses the symbol n_r without a definition.
  5. [4.2] The numerical evaluation of the free energies for the new saddle families is not described; the paper should specify how the on-shell action is computed numerically and how boundary terms or subtractions are handled.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the new saddle families are constructed by solving the EOM directly, and all self-citations are background rather than load-bearing.

full rationale

The central claims of the paper—the existence of the boson star-PL and hairy BG saddles, and the resulting five-saddle thermodynamics—are derived by directly solving the equations of motion (2.5)-(2.8) with stated boundary conditions, not by fitting parameters to empirical data or by invoking an unexamined prior result. The q=0 BG saddle, used later in the finite-q phase diagram, is rederived analytically in Section 3.2 (Eqs. (3.4)-(3.17)), so the self-citations to [30,31,32] are contextual rather than load-bearing; external citations such as [33,36,37,38] corroborate, but do not by themselves create, the new saddle constructions. Free energies are on-shell evaluations of the same Euclidean action, and the phase comparisons are internal to the model. The acknowledged limitations—the small zigzag near the boson star-PL junction, the lack of an explicit higher-order smoothness check for the r=rmax patching (4.6)-(4.13), and the undetermined low-temperature phase boundaries—are numerical or mathematical completeness concerns that affect confidence in the existence of the fifth saddle, but they are not circular reductions: no equation is assumed to prove itself, and no fitted quantity is renamed as a prediction.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on the GPI framework, the reliability of numerical shooting, and the assumed one-loop stability of BG phases. No empirical data are fitted; shooting constants are integration constants fixed by boundary conditions. No new particles, forces, or dimensions are introduced.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Euclidean gravitational path integral, evaluated at zero loop and restricted to static circularly symmetric configurations, captures the thermodynamic properties of the system.
    Assumed in Section 1 footnote 1 and Section 2; this is the standard GPI framework the whole analysis rests on.
  • ad hoc to paper One-loop corrections make the BG heat capacity nonnegative, so the zero-loop free energy comparison identifies stable phases.
    Section 3.2: 'I assume this to be true and remove the quotation marks.' No calculation is provided; the phase diagram depends on this assumption.
  • ad hoc to paper Only zero-node scalar solutions are thermodynamically relevant; multi-node solutions are ignored.
    Footnote 13 says multi-node solutions exist but are excluded by a rule of thumb about stability, without a detailed stability analysis.
  • domain assumption There are no black hole horizons in three-dimensional gravity with Lambda=0.
    Used in Section 4.1.3 to justify that only BG horizons can exist; relies on references [38,33].

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Many phases in a hairy box in three dimensions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/OUV3ZFHN

@misc{pith2026250620528,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Many phases in a hairy box in three dimensions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/OUV3ZFHN}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.20528}
}
read the original abstract

In this paper, I investigate gravitational thermodynamics of the Einstein-Maxwell-scalar system in three dimensions without a cosmological constant. In the previous work by Krishnan,Shekhar, and Bala Subramanian (Nucl. Phys. B 958 (2020) 115115 [33]), it was argued that this system has no BH saddles, but has only empty (flat space) saddles and boson star saddles. It was then concluded that the structure of the thermodynamic phase space is much simpler than in the higher dimensional cases. I will show that, in addition to the known boson star and empty saddles, three more types of saddles exist in this system: the BG saddle, its hairy generalization, and a novel configuration called the boson star-PL saddle. As a result, the structure is richer than one might naively expect and is very similar to the higher dimensional ones.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.20528 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Schematic picture of empty saddle (left) and BG sad [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. (left) Behavior of free energies of q = 0. Fempty is constant and FBG is a linear function. The point of intersection of the lines corresponds to the transition temperature Ttr (3.17). (right) Phase diagram of q = 0. The low temperature phase is the empty phase and the high temperature phase is the BG phase. The phase boundary is given by the curve T = Ttr(µ, rb) (3.17). panel, for a fixed µ, the low temperature reg… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. (left) The solution curve in the space of (a0, ϕ0) for rb = 5G and √ Gq = 0.1. Solutions corresponding to the other points neither satisfy the boundary condition ϕ(rb) = 0 nor have ϕ(r) more than one zero. (For the latter, see the footnote 13.) The endpoint of the curve corresponds to the solution with f(rb) → 0. Therefore, numerically determining the exact location of the endpoint is a somewhat difficult task. (rig… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (8 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (left) Schematic picture of the r(˜r)−φ section of the boson star-PL saddle. It is covered by two coordinate systems; the lower hemisphere is covered by (t, r, φ) and the upper hemisphere is covered by (t, r, φ ˜ ). The upper hemisphere has a hole whose boundary is the…
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Although the topology of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: (left) The solution curve for boson star (black) and boson star-PL (red) in the space of (a0, ϕ0) for rb = 5G and √ Gq = 0.1. Solutions corresponding to the other points neither satisfy the boundary condition ϕ(rb) = 0 nor have ϕ(r) more than one zero. The endpoint of …
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Behavior of free energy of boson star and boson star [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The regions classified by the number of boson star an [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: (left) Solution curve for the hairy BG on the space of (aG1, ϕG0) with fixing rG = 6G. The other parameters are set to rb = 5G and √ Gq = 0.1. Since the aG1 is negative and becomes exponentially small, I used log(−aG1) for the vertical axis. (right) Example of a hairy …
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Free energies versus temperature with fixed chemic [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: (left) The phase diagram of √ Gq = 1.2. The low µ and high T regions are unchanged from the q = 0 case ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_10.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

44 extracted references · 20 canonical work pages

  1. [33]

    A ha iry box in three dimensions,

    C. Krishnan, R. Shekhar and P. N. Bala Subramanian, “A ha iry box in three dimensions,” Nucl. Phys. B 958, 115115 (2020) doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2020.115115 [ar Xiv:1905.11265 [gr-qc]]

    work page arXiv 2020

  2. [31]

    Thermodynamics of the 3-dimensional Ei nstein-Maxwell system,

    S. Miyashita, “Thermodynamics of the 3-dimensional Ei nstein-Maxwell system,” JHEP 06, 134 (2024) doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2024)134 [arXiv:2403.014 36 [gr-qc]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep06(2024)134 2024

  3. [1]

    Thermodynamics of Black Hol es in anti-De Sitter Space,

    S. W. Hawking and D. N. Page, “Thermodynamics of Black Hol es in anti-De Sitter Space,” Commun. Math. Phys. 87, 577 (1983) doi:10.1007/BF01208266 20

    doi:10.1007/bf01208266 1983

  4. [2]

    Path Integra ls and the Indefiniteness of the Gravitational Action,

    G. W. Gibbons, S. W. Hawking and M. J. Perry, “Path Integra ls and the Indefiniteness of the Gravitational Action,” Nucl. Phys. B 138, 141-150 (1978) doi:10.1016/0550-3213(78)90161-X

    doi:10.1016/0550-3213(78)90161-x 1978

  5. [3]

    Action Integrals and Par tition Functions in Quantum Gravity,

    G. W. Gibbons and S. W. Hawking, “Action Integrals and Par tition Functions in Quantum Gravity,” Phys. Rev. D 15, 2752-2756 (1977) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.15.2752

    doi:10.1103/physrevd.15.2752 1977

  6. [4]

    The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,

    J. M. Maldacena, “The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,” A dv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2, 231-252 (1998) doi:10.4310/ATMP.1998.v2.n2.a1 [arXiv:hep-th/9711200 [hep-th]]

    arXiv 1998

  7. [5]

    Gauge the ory correlators from noncrit- ical string theory,

    S. S. Gubser, I. R. Klebanov and A. M. Polyakov, “Gauge the ory correlators from noncrit- ical string theory,” Phys. Lett. B 428, 105-114 (1998) doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(98)00377-3 [arXiv:hep-th/9802109 [hep-th]]

    arXiv 1998

  8. [6]

    Anti de Sitter space and holography,

    E. Witten, “Anti de Sitter space and holography,” Adv. Th eor. Math. Phys. 2, 253-291 (1998) doi:10.4310/ATMP.1998.v2.n2.a2 [arXiv:hep-th/9802150 [hep-th]]

    arXiv 1998

Show all 44 references
  1. [7]

    The Pa ge curve of Hawking ra- diation from semiclassical geometry,

    A. Almheiri, R. Mahajan, J. Maldacena and Y. Zhao, “The Pa ge curve of Hawking ra- diation from semiclassical geometry,” JHEP 03, 149 (2020) doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2020)149 [arXiv:1908.10996 [hep-th]]

    2020 arXiv

  2. [8]

    Rep lica wormholes and the black hole interior,

    G. Penington, S. H. Shenker, D. Stanford and Z. Yang, “Rep lica wormholes and the black hole interior,” JHEP 03, 205 (2022) doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2022)205 [arXiv:1911.11 977 [hep-th]]

    2022 doi

  3. [9]

    Replica Wormholes and the Entropy of Hawking Radiation,

    A. Almheiri, T. Hartman, J. Maldacena, E. Shaghoulian an d A. Tajdini, “Replica Wormholes and the Entropy of Hawking Radiation,” JHEP 05, 013 (2020) doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2020)013 [arXiv:1911.12333 [hep-th]]

    2020 arXiv

  4. [10]

    Black hole thermodynamics and the Eucl idean Einstein action,

    J. W. York, Jr., “Black hole thermodynamics and the Eucl idean Einstein action,” Phys. Rev. D 33, 2092-2099 (1986) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.33.2092

    1986 doi

  5. [11]

    C harged AdS black holes and catastrophic holography,

    A. Chamblin, R. Emparan, C. V. Johnson and R. C. Myers, “C harged AdS black holes and catastrophic holography,” Phys. Rev. D 60, 064018 (1999) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.60.064018 [arXiv:hep-th/9902170 [hep-th]]

    1999 arXiv

  6. [12]

    Hologra phic Superconductors,

    S. A. Hartnoll, C. P. Herzog and G. T. Horowitz, “Hologra phic Superconductors,” JHEP 12, 015 (2008) doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2008/12/015 [arXiv:08 10.1563 [hep-th]]

    2008 doi

  7. [13]

    The final fate of instab ility of Reissner-Nordstr¨ om-anti- de Sitter black holes by charged complex scalar fields,

    K. Maeda, S. Fujii and J. i. Koga, “The final fate of instab ility of Reissner-Nordstr¨ om-anti- de Sitter black holes by charged complex scalar fields,” Phys . Rev. D 81, 124020 (2010) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.81.124020 [arXiv:1003.2689 [gr-q c]]

    2010 arXiv

  8. [14]

    Small Hairy Black Holes in Global AdS Spacetime,

    P. Basu, J. Bhattacharya, S. Bhattacharyya, R. Loganay agam, S. Minwalla and V. Umesh, “Small Hairy Black Holes in Global AdS Spacetime,” JHEP 10, 045 (2010) doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2010)045 [arXiv:1003.3232 [hep-th] ]

    2010 arXiv

  9. [15]

    Phases of Global AdS Black Holes,

    P. Basu, C. Krishnan and P. N. Bala Subramanian, “Phases of Global AdS Black Holes,” JHEP 06, 139 (2016) doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2016)139 [arXiv:1602.07 211 [hep-th]]. 21

    2016 doi

  10. [16]

    Stability of charged g lobal AdS 4 spacetimes,

    R. Arias, J. Mas and A. Serantes, “Stability of charged g lobal AdS 4 spacetimes,” JHEP 09, 024 (2016) doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2016)024 [arXiv:1606.008 30 [hep-th]]

    2016 doi

  11. [17]

    Stable monopole and dyon s olutions in the Einstein-Yang- Mills theory in asymptotically Anti-de Sitter space,

    J. Bjoraker and Y. Hosotani, “Stable monopole and dyon s olutions in the Einstein-Yang- Mills theory in asymptotically Anti-de Sitter space,” Phys . Rev. Lett. 84, 1853 (2000) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.1853 [arXiv:gr-qc/9906091 [gr-qc]]

    2000 arXiv

  12. [18]

    Monopoles, dyons and blac k holes in the four-dimensional Einstein-Yang-Mills theory,

    J. Bjoraker and Y. Hosotani, “Monopoles, dyons and blac k holes in the four-dimensional Einstein-Yang-Mills theory,” Phys. Rev. D 62, 043513 (2000) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.62.043513 [arXiv:hep-th/0002098 [hep-th]]

    2000 arXiv

  13. [19]

    Existence of stable hairy black holes i n SU(2) Einstein Yang-Mills theory with a negative cosmological constant,

    E. Winstanley, “Existence of stable hairy black holes i n SU(2) Einstein Yang-Mills theory with a negative cosmological constant,” Class. Quant. Grav. 16, 1963-1978 (1999) doi:10.1088/0264- 9381/16/6/325 [arXiv:gr-qc/9812064 [gr-qc]]

    1999 arXiv

  14. [20]

    NonAbelian solu tions in AdS 4 and d = 11 supergravity,

    R. B. Mann, E. Radu and D. H. Tchrakian, “NonAbelian solu tions in AdS 4 and d = 11 supergravity,” Phys. Rev. D 74, 064015 (2006) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.74.064015 [arXiv:h ep- th/0606004 [hep-th]]

    2006

  15. [21]

    Thermodyna mic properties of asymptotically anti-de Sitter black holes in d = 4 Einstein–Yang–Mills theo ry,

    O. Kichakova, J. Kunz, E. Radu and Y. Shnir, “Thermodyna mic properties of asymptotically anti-de Sitter black holes in d = 4 Einstein–Yang–Mills theo ry,” Phys. Lett. B 747, 205-211 (2015) doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2015.05.052 [arXiv:1503 .01268 [hep-th]]

    2015 doi

  16. [22]

    Monopole s olutions in AdS space,

    A. R. Lugo, E. F. Moreno and F. A. Schaposnik, “Monopole s olutions in AdS space,” Phys. Lett. B 473, 35-42 (2000) doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(99)01481-1 [arXiv :hep-th/9911209 [hep-th]]

    2000 arXiv

  17. [23]

    Monopole and dyon solut ions in AdS space,

    A. R. Lugo and F. A. Schaposnik, “Monopole and dyon solut ions in AdS space,” Phys. Lett. B 467, 43-53 (1999) doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(99)01178-8 [arXiv :hep-th/9909226 [hep-th]]

    1999 arXiv

  18. [24]

    Holograph ic Phase Transition from Dyons in an AdS Black Hole Background,

    A. R. Lugo, E. F. Moreno and F. A. Schaposnik, “Holograph ic Phase Transition from Dyons in an AdS Black Hole Background,” JHEP 03, 013 (2010) doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2010)013 [arXiv:1001.3378 [hep-th]]

    2010 arXiv

  19. [25]

    Holograph y and AdS4 self-gravitating dyons,

    A. R. Lugo, E. F. Moreno and F. A. Schaposnik, “Holograph y and AdS4 self-gravitating dyons,” JHEP 11, 081 (2010) doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2010)081 [arXiv:1007.14 82 [hep-th]]

    2010 doi

  20. [26]

    Holographic phase transi tions from higgsed, non abelian charged black holes,

    G. L. Giordano and A. R. Lugo, “Holographic phase transi tions from higgsed, non abelian charged black holes,” JHEP 07, 172 (2015) doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2015)172 [arXiv:1501.04 033 [hep-th]]

    2015 doi

  21. [27]

    AdS Monopole Black Hole an d Phase Transition,

    S. Miyashita and K. i. Maeda, “AdS Monopole Black Hole an d Phase Transition,” Phys. Rev. D 94, no.12, 124037 (2016) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.94.124037 [a rXiv:1610.07350 [gr-qc]]

    2016 arXiv

  22. [28]

    Charged black hole in a grand canonical ensemble,

    H. W. Braden, J. D. Brown, B. F. Whiting and J. W. York, Jr. , “Charged black hole in a grand canonical ensemble,” Phys. Rev. D 42, 3376-3385 (1990) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.42.3376

    1990 doi

  23. [29]

    Hairy B lack Holes in a Box,

    P. Basu, C. Krishnan and P. N. Bala Subramanian, “Hairy B lack Holes in a Box,” JHEP 11, 041 (2016) doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2016)041 [arXiv:1609.012 08 [hep-th]]. 22

    2016 doi

  24. [30]

    Thermodynamics of the Einstein-Maxwel l system,

    S. Miyashita, “Thermodynamics of the Einstein-Maxwel l system,” JHEP 04, 083 (2024) doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2024)083 [arXiv:2402.16113 [gr-qc] ]

    2024 arXiv

  25. [32]

    Gravitational and gravitoscalar therm odynamics,

    S. Miyashita, “Gravitational and gravitoscalar therm odynamics,” JHEP 09, 121 (2021) doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2021)121 [arXiv:2106.12273 [gr-qc] ]

    2021 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Role of conformal three geometry in the dynamics of gravitation,

    J. W. York, Jr., “Role of conformal three geometry in the dynamics of gravitation,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 28, 1082-1085 (1972) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.28.1082

    1972 doi

  27. [35]

    Quasilocal energy and co nserved charges derived from the gravitational action,

    J. D. Brown and J. W. York, Jr., “Quasilocal energy and co nserved charges derived from the gravitational action,” Phys. Rev. D 47, 1407-1419 (1993) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.47.1407 [arXiv:gr-qc/9209012 [gr-qc]]

    1993 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Euclidean de Sitter black hole s and microcanonical equilibrium,

    P. Draper and S. Farkas, “Euclidean de Sitter black hole s and microcanonical equilibrium,” Phys. Rev. D 105, no.12, 126021 (2022) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.105.126021 [ arXiv:2203.01871 [hep-th]]

    2022 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Thermodynamic ensemb les with cosmological horizons,

    B. Banihashemi and T. Jacobson, “Thermodynamic ensemb les with cosmological horizons,” JHEP 07, 042 (2022) doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2022)042 [arXiv:2204.05 324 [hep-th]]

    2022 doi

  30. [38]

    No black hole theorem in three-dimensional gra vity,

    D. Ida, “No black hole theorem in three-dimensional gra vity,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 3758-3760 (2000) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.3758 [arXiv:gr-qc/0 005129 [gr-qc]]

    2000 doi

  31. [39]

    Breaking an Abelian gauge symmetry near a black hole horizon,

    S. S. Gubser, “Breaking an Abelian gauge symmetry near a black hole horizon,” Phys. Rev. D 78, 065034 (2008) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.78.065034 [arXiv:0 801.2977 [hep-th]]

    2008 doi

  32. [40]

    Buildin g a Holographic Superconductor,

    S. A. Hartnoll, C. P. Herzog and G. T. Horowitz, “Buildin g a Holographic Superconductor,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 031601 (2008) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.031601 [arX iv:0803.3295 [hep-th]]

    2008 arXiv

  33. [41]

    The Python’s Lunch: geometric obstructions to decoding Hawking radiati on,

    A. R. Brown, H. Gharibyan, G. Penington and L. Susskind, “The Python’s Lunch: geometric obstructions to decoding Hawking radiati on,” JHEP 08, 121 (2020) doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2020)121 [arXiv:1912.00228 [hep-th ]]

    2020 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Holographic Sup erconductor/Insulator Transition at Zero Temperature,

    T. Nishioka, S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi, “Holographic Sup erconductor/Insulator Transition at Zero Temperature,” JHEP 03, 131 (2010) doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2010)131 [arXiv:0911.09 62 [hep-th]]

    2010 doi

  35. [43]

    Complete Phase Diagrams for a Holographic Superconduc- tor/Insulator System,

    G. T. Horowitz and B. Way, “Complete Phase Diagrams for a Holographic Superconduc- tor/Insulator System,” JHEP 11, 011 (2010) doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2010)011 [arXiv:1007.37 14 [hep-th]]

    2010 doi

  36. [44]

    Zero Temperature Limi t of Holographic Superconductors,

    G. T. Horowitz and M. M. Roberts, “Zero Temperature Limi t of Holographic Superconductors,” JHEP 11, 015 (2009) doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2009/11/015 [arXiv:0 908.3677 [hep-th]]. 23

    2009 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.