pith. sign in

arxiv: 2506.20660 · v2 · pith:ETWJTJAKnew · submitted 2025-06-25 · 🪐 quant-ph · cond-mat.quant-gas· physics.atom-ph

Continuous operation of a coherent 3,000-qubit system

Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 08:26 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph cond-mat.quant-gasphysics.atom-ph
keywords neutral atomsoptical tweezersatom arrayscontinuous operationcoherent storageoptical latticesquantum error correctionatomic qubits
0
0 comments X

The pith

Dual optical lattice conveyors enable continuous reloading of a coherent 3,000-atom qubit array for over two hours.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper shows how to operate a large neutral-atom qubit system continuously rather than in pulses limited by atom loss. Fresh atoms are moved from reservoirs using two optical lattice conveyor belts and extracted into optical tweezers in the science region. The process reloads at a rate of 300,000 atoms per second, allowing over 30,000 initialized qubits per second and sustaining more than 3,000 atoms in the array for over two hours. New atoms can be added in spin-polarized or coherent states while keeping the quantum states of nearby stored qubits intact. This continuous mode could support longer experiments in quantum computation, simulation, and sensing by eliminating reloading downtime.

Core claim

The authors establish that their dual-conveyor architecture transports atom reservoirs into the science region where atoms are repeatedly extracted into optical tweezers, creating over 30,000 initialized qubits per second and maintaining an array of over 3,000 atoms for more than 2 hours. They further show persistent refilling with qubits in spin-polarized or coherent superposition states without affecting the coherence of stored qubits nearby.

What carries the argument

Dual optical lattice conveyor belts that transport atom reservoirs into the science region for repeated extraction into optical tweezers without affecting the coherence of nearby stored qubits.

If this is right

  • The architecture supports assembly and maintenance of large atom arrays over extended periods exceeding two hours.
  • Persistent refilling is possible with qubits in either spin-polarized or coherent superposition states.
  • The approach removes the pulsed-mode limitation caused by atom losses in quantum simulations and computation.
  • It enables deep-circuit quantum evolution through quantum error correction by avoiding reloading downtime.
  • Results support large-scale continuously operated atomic clocks, sensors, and fault-tolerant quantum computers.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Increasing reservoir capacity could extend continuous operation times for arrays larger than 3,000 atoms.
  • Separating transport from the science region may allow independent optimization of loading rates and coherence times.
  • The method could integrate with error-correction cycles to sustain fault-tolerant computation without periodic resets.

Load-bearing premise

The dual optical lattice conveyor transport and tweezer extraction steps can be executed repeatedly without measurable decoherence or loss of fidelity for qubits already held in the science region.

What would settle it

An experiment showing measurable decoherence or loss of fidelity in stored qubits after repeated cycles of conveyor transport and tweezer extraction would falsify the central claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.20660 by Alexandra A. Geim, Dolev Bluvstein, Elias C. Trapp, Jinen Guo, Lisa M. Peters, Luke M. Stewart, Marcin Kalinowski, Markus Greiner, Mikhail D. Lukin, Mohamed H. Abobeih, Neng-Chun Chiu, Pavel Stroganov, Simon Hollerith, Simon J. Evered, Sophie H. Li, Tout T. Wang, Vladan Vuleti\'c, Xingjian Lyu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Atom array architecture for continuous reloading. a, A cloud of laser-cooled atoms is transported over 0.5 m from a separate MOT region into the science region via two optical lattice conveyor belts crossed at an angle. In the science region, the optical lattice serves as an atomic reservoir, from which a 2D array of optical tweezers repeatedly extracts atoms into the “preparation zone”. Here, atoms are la… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Iterative assembly and continuous maintenance of a large-scale atomic array. a, Atom fluorescence image outlining the zone architecture consisting of lattice reservoir, 1,440-site preparation zone, and 3,240-site storage zone. (Averaged) images of each zone are exposed separately and combined with different weights for visualization purposes. b, Single￾shot fluorescence image of 3,217 atoms in the 3,240-si… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Benchmarking concurrent qubit preparation. a, Coherence contrast under various conditions when applying N-repetitions of an XY16 dynamical decoupling (DD) sequence with π-pulse spacing 2τ ≈ 1.6 ms to storage qubits, where the reference measurement yields T2 = 1.34(4) s (gray). Operating the distant MOT in parallel to DD, we observe a minimal effect on coherence (green) compared to the reference, but a stro… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Continuous reloading while maintaining storage qubit coherence. a, Time sequence visualizing our con￾tinuous reloading protocol (see also ED [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Neutral atoms are a promising platform for quantum science, enabling advances in areas ranging from quantum simulations and computation to metrology, atomic clocks and quantum networking. While atom losses typically limit these systems to a pulsed mode, continuous operation could substantially enhance cycle rates, remove bottlenecks in metrology, and enable deep-circuit quantum evolution through quantum error correction. Here we demonstrate an experimental architecture for high-rate reloading and continuous operation of a large-scale atom-array system while realizing coherent storage and manipulation of quantum information. Our approach utilizes a series of two optical lattice conveyor belts to transport atom reservoirs into the science region, where atoms are repeatedly extracted into optical tweezers without affecting the coherence of qubits stored nearby. Using a reloading rate of 300,000 atoms in tweezers per second, we create over 30,000 initialized qubits per second, which we leverage to assemble and maintain an array of over 3,000 atoms for more than 2 hours. Furthermore, we demonstrate persistent refilling of the array with atomic qubits in either a spin-polarized or a coherent superposition state while preserving the quantum state of stored qubits. Our results pave the way for the realization of large-scale continuously operated atomic clocks, sensors, and fault-tolerant quantum computers.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports an experimental architecture for continuous operation of a neutral-atom qubit array. It uses two optical lattice conveyor belts to transport atom reservoirs into the science region for repeated extraction into optical tweezers at 300,000 atoms/s, enabling assembly and maintenance of >3,000 atoms for >2 hours while demonstrating refilling with spin-polarized or coherent-superposition qubits without disturbing stored qubits.

Significance. If the non-interference claim is rigorously verified, the result would be significant for neutral-atom platforms, enabling higher cycle rates, continuous metrology, and fault-tolerant quantum evolution by removing atom-loss bottlenecks in pulsed operation.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract (and corresponding Results section): the central claim that conveyor transport plus tweezer extraction can be repeated at 300 k atoms/s 'without affecting the coherence of qubits stored nearby' is load-bearing for the continuous-operation result, yet the provided text supplies no Ramsey contrast, Bell fidelity, or phase-error data comparing runs with versus without active reloading; without these metrics the multi-hour coherence preservation cannot be assessed.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: performance numbers (300,000 atoms/s, >30,000 initialized qubits/s, >2 h) are stated without error bars, statistical uncertainties, or sample sizes.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thoughtful review and for highlighting the importance of quantitative coherence metrics to support the central claim. We address the comment below and will revise the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract (and corresponding Results section): the central claim that conveyor transport plus tweezer extraction can be repeated at 300 k atoms/s 'without affecting the coherence of qubits stored nearby' is load-bearing for the continuous-operation result, yet the provided text supplies no Ramsey contrast, Bell fidelity, or phase-error data comparing runs with versus without active reloading; without these metrics the multi-hour coherence preservation cannot be assessed.

    Authors: We agree that direct comparative metrics are necessary to rigorously substantiate the non-interference claim. The submitted manuscript presents coherence data for the stored qubits during continuous reloading but does not include side-by-side Ramsey contrast or Bell fidelity measurements with the conveyors and extraction off. In the revised manuscript we will add these data (new panel in the relevant Results figure and accompanying text) showing Ramsey contrast and phase stability with active reloading at the stated rate, compared against static-array controls. This will allow quantitative assessment of any degradation. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: pure experimental demonstration with measured outcomes

full rationale

This paper reports an experimental architecture and measurements for continuous atom-array operation. The central claims (reloading rate of 300,000 atoms/s, assembly and maintenance of >3000 atoms for >2 h, refilling while preserving coherence) are direct experimental results, not quantities derived from equations or predictions within the paper. No derivations, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations appear in the provided text. The architecture's feasibility is established by the reported measurements themselves rather than by any self-referential reduction. This is the expected outcome for an experimental methods paper.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Experimental demonstration paper; no mathematical derivations, free parameters, or new postulated entities are introduced. Relies on established neutral-atom trapping and laser techniques from prior literature.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5837 in / 1256 out tokens · 23802 ms · 2026-05-25T08:26:01.594099+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 6 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Magic tricycles: Efficient magic state generation with finite block-length quantum LDPC codes

    quant-ph 2025-08 conditional novelty 7.0

    Tricycle codes generalize bicycle codes to three homological dimensions, enabling constant-depth CCZ circuits and single-shot magic state generation with circuit-level thresholds above 0.5% and low error rates at bloc...

  2. Bridging Krylov Complexity and Universal Analog Quantum Simulator

    quant-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Generalized Krylov complexity predicts the minimum time to realize target operations in analog quantum simulators such as Rydberg atom arrays.

  3. Loading and Imaging Atom Arrays via Electromagnetically Induced Transparency

    physics.atom-ph 2025-09 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    EIT cooling with fluorescence imaging achieves 99.7% readout fidelity and 98.2% survival for 87Rb atom arrays in 2.3 G fields, validated up to 10 G.

  4. Architecting Distributed Quantum Computers: Design Insights from Resource Estimation

    quant-ph 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A resource estimation framework for distributed fault-tolerant quantum computers based on lattice surgery identifies feasible hardware configurations for eight applications across thousands of setups, showing that arc...

  5. Reducibility of native weighted graphs on Rydberg Arrays

    quant-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Classical kernelisation fully reduces many small and sparse unit-disk graphs for MIS and MWIS native to Rydberg arrays, but dense graphs retain finite irreducible kernels, with vertex weights increasing reducibility a...

  6. Fault-tolerant interfaces for modular quantum computing on diverse qubit platforms

    quant-ph 2025-10 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Comparative analysis of fault-tolerant interfaces for modular quantum computing using surface codes, including novel grow-and-distil protocols, to determine optimal strategies across hardware parameters for low logica...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

60 extracted references · 60 canonical work pages · cited by 6 Pith papers · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    subar- rays

    (Methods). While previous experiments [17–19] have relied on dissipative laser cooling or tweezer-lattice in- tensity ramps when loading fresh atoms from the reser- voir, our scattering-free method helps preserve coherence of nearby storage qubits and avoiding lattice ramp-down enables repetitive usage of the reservoir. In order to prepare atomic qubits, ...

  2. [2]

    Browaeys and T

    A. Browaeys and T. Lahaye, Many-body physics with individually controlled Rydberg atoms, Nature Physics 16, 132 (2020)

  3. [3]

    Gross and I

    C. Gross and I. Bloch, Quantum simulations with ul- tracold atoms in optical lattices, Science 357, 995 (2017)

  4. [4]

    Xu, M. et al. , A neutral-atom Hubbard quantum simu- lator in the cryogenic regime, Nature (2025)

  5. [5]

    Evered, S. J. et al., High-fidelity parallel entangling gates on a neutral-atom quantum computer, Nature 622, 268 (2023)

  6. [6]

    Muniz, J. A. et al. , High-Fidelity Universal Gates in the 171Yb Ground-State Nuclear-Spin Qubit, PRX Quantum 6, 020334 (2025)

  7. [7]

    R. B.-S. Tsai, X. Sun, A. L. Shaw, R. Finkelstein, and M. Endres, Benchmarking and Fidelity Response The- ory of High-Fidelity Rydberg Entangling Gates, PRX Quantum 6, 010331 (2025)

  8. [8]

    et al., Spectroscopy and Modeling of 171Yb Ry- dberg States for High-Fidelity Two-Qubit Gates, Phys

    Peper, M. et al., Spectroscopy and Modeling of 171Yb Ry- dberg States for High-Fidelity Two-Qubit Gates, Phys. Rev. X 15, 011009 (2025)

  9. [9]

    Radnaev, A. G. et al., A universal neutral-atom quantum computer with individual optical addressing and non- destructive readout, arXiv (2025), 2408.08288 [quant- ph]

  10. [10]

    et al., Logical quantum processor based on reconfigurable atom arrays, Nature 626, 58 (2024)

    Bluvstein, D. et al., Logical quantum processor based on reconfigurable atom arrays, Nature 626, 58 (2024)

  11. [11]

    Manetsch, H. J. et al. , A tweezer array with 6100 highly coherent atomic qubits, arXiv (2024), arXiv:2403.12021 [quant-ph]

  12. [12]

    et al., Half-minute-scale atomic coherence and high relative stability in a tweezer clock, Nature588, 408 (2020)

    Young, A. et al., Half-minute-scale atomic coherence and high relative stability in a tweezer clock, Nature588, 408 (2020)

  13. [13]

    Finkelstein, R. et al. , Universal quantum operations and ancilla-based read-out for tweezer clocks, Nature 634, 321 (2024)

  14. [14]

    Cao, A. et al. , Multi-qubit gates and Schr¨ odinger cat states in an optical clock, Nature 634, 315 (2024)

  15. [15]

    J. P. Covey, H. Weinfurter, and H. Bernien, Quantum networks with neutral atom processing nodes, npj Quantum Information 9, 90 (2023)

  16. [16]

    Hartung, M

    L. Hartung, M. Seubert, S. Welte, E. Distante, and G. Rempe, A quantum-network register assembled with optical tweezers in an optical cavity, Science 385, 179 (2024)

  17. [17]

    Grinkemeyer, B. et al. , Error-detected quantum opera- tions with neutral atoms mediated by an optical cavity, Science 387, 1301 (2025)

  18. [18]

    Pause, T

    L. Pause, T. Preuschoff, D. Sch¨ affner, M. Schlosser, and G. Birkl, Reservoir-based deterministic loading of single- atom tweezer arrays, Phys. Rev. Res. 5, L032009 (2023)

  19. [19]

    Norcia, M. et al. , Iterative Assembly of 171Yb Atom Arrays with Cavity-Enhanced Optical Lattices, PRX Quantum 5, 030316 (2024)

  20. [20]

    et al., Continuous operation of large-scale atom arrays in optical lattices, Phys

    Gyger, F. et al., Continuous operation of large-scale atom arrays in optical lattices, Phys. Rev. Res. 6, 033104 (2024)

  21. [21]

    Singh, S

    K. Singh, S. Anand, A. Pocklington, J. T. Kemp, and H. Bernien, Dual-Element, Two-Dimensional Atom Ar- ray with Continuous-Mode Operation, Phys. Rev. X 12, 011040 (2022)

  22. [22]

    A. D. Ludlow, M. M. Boyd, J. Ye, E. Peik, and P. O. Schmidt, Optical atomic clocks, Rev. Mod. Phys. 87, 637 (2015)

  23. [23]

    Bluvstein, D. et al. , Architectural mechanisms of a uni- versal fault-tolerant quantum computer, arXiv preprint arXiv:2025 (2025)

  24. [24]

    et al., Leveraging Atom Loss Errors in Fault Tolerant Quantum Algorithms, arXiv (2025), 2502.20558 [quant-ph]

    Baranes, G. et al., Leveraging Atom Loss Errors in Fault Tolerant Quantum Algorithms, arXiv (2025), 2502.20558 [quant-ph]

  25. [25]

    Zhang, Z. et al. , A high optical access cryogenic system for Rydberg atom arrays with a 3000-second trap life- time, arXiv (2024), 2412.09780 [physics.atom-ph]

  26. [26]

    C. A. Pattison, G. Baranes, J. P. B. Ataides, M. D. Lukin, and H. Zhou, Fast quantum interconnects via constant- 8 rate entanglement distillation, arXiv (2024), 2408.15936 [quant-ph]

  27. [27]

    B. M. Terhal, Quantum error correction for quantum memories, Reviews of Modern Physics 87, 307 (2015)

  28. [28]

    Fault-tolerant quantum computation

    J. Preskill, Fault-tolerant quantum computation, arXiv (1997), quant-ph/9712048 [quant-ph]

  29. [29]

    Biedermann, G. W. et al. , Zero-Dead-Time Operation of Interleaved Atomic Clocks, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 170802 (2013)

  30. [30]

    Schioppo, M. et al. , Ultrastable optical clock with two cold-atom ensembles, Nature Photonics 11, 48 (2017)

  31. [31]

    Okaba, R

    S. Okaba, R. Takeuchi, S. Tsuji, and H. Katori, Con- tinuous generation of an ultracold atomic beam using crossed moving optical lattices, Phys. Rev. Appl. 21, 034006 (2024)

  32. [32]

    Cline, J. R. K. et al., Continuous Collective Strong Coup- ling of Strontium Atoms to a High Finesse Ring Cavity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 013403 (2025)

  33. [33]

    Chen, C.-C. et al. , Continuous Bose–Einstein condensa- tion, Nature 606, 683 (2022)

  34. [34]

    Hu, B. et al. , Site-selective cavity readout and classical error correction of a 5-bit atomic register, arXiv (2024), 2408.15329 [quant-ph]

  35. [35]

    S. J. M. Kuppens, K. L. Corwin, K. W. Miller, T. E. Chupp, and C. E. Wieman, Loading an optical dipole trap, Phys. Rev. A 62, 013406 (2000)

  36. [36]

    Trisnadi, M

    J. Trisnadi, M. Zhang, L. Weiss, and C. Chin, Design and construction of a quantum matter synthesizer, Review of Scientific Instruments 93, 083203 (2022)

  37. [37]

    Klostermann, T. et al. , Fast long-distance transport of cold cesium atoms, Phys. Rev. A 105, 043319 (2022)

  38. [38]

    Matthies, A. J. et al. , Long-distance optical-conveyor- belt transport of ultracold 133Cs and 87Rb atoms, Phys. Rev. A 109, 023321 (2024)

  39. [39]

    Schlosser, G

    N. Schlosser, G. Reymond, and P. Grangier, Collisional Blockade in Microscopic Optical Dipole Traps, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 023005 (2002)

  40. [40]

    et al., Optimized production of large Bose- Einstein condensates, Phys

    Comparat, D. et al., Optimized production of large Bose- Einstein condensates, Phys. Rev. A 73, 043410 (2006)

  41. [41]

    C. H. Chow, B. L. Ng, V. Prakash, and C. Kurtsiefer, Fano resonance in excitation spectroscopy and cooling of an optically trapped single atom, Phys. Rev. Res. 6, 023154 (2024)

  42. [42]

    Savoie, D. et al. , Interleaved atom interferometry for high-sensitivity inertial measurements, Science Advances 4, 10.1126/sciadv.aau7948 (2018)

  43. [43]

    Chikkatur, A. P. et al. , A Continuous Source of Bose- Einstein Condensed Atoms, Science 296, 2193 (2002)

  44. [44]

    et al., Accelerating the Assembly of Defect-Free Atomic Arrays with Maximum Parallelisms, Phys

    Wang, S. et al., Accelerating the Assembly of Defect-Free Atomic Arrays with Maximum Parallelisms, Phys. Rev. Appl. 19, 054032 (2023)

  45. [45]

    et al., AI-Enabled Rapid Assembly of Thousands of Defect-Free Neutral Atom Arrays with Constant-time- overhead, arXiv (2024), arXiv:2412.14647 [quant-ph]

    Lin, R. et al., AI-Enabled Rapid Assembly of Thousands of Defect-Free Neutral Atom Arrays with Constant-time- overhead, arXiv (2024), arXiv:2412.14647 [quant-ph]

  46. [46]

    Holman and et al., Trapping of Single Atoms in Metas- urface Optical Tweezer Arrays, arXiv (2024), 2411.05321 [physics.atom-ph]

    A. Holman and et al., Trapping of Single Atoms in Metas- urface Optical Tweezer Arrays, arXiv (2024), 2411.05321 [physics.atom-ph]

  47. [47]

    Xu, Q. et al. , Constant-overhead fault-tolerant quantum computation with reconfigurable atom arrays, Nature Physics 20, 1084 (2024)

  48. [48]

    N. P. Breuckmann and J. N. Eberhardt, Quantum Low- Density Parity-Check Codes, PRX Quantum 2, 040101 (2021)

  49. [49]

    Bravyi, S. et al. , High-threshold and low-overhead fault- tolerant quantum memory, Nature 627, 778 (2024)

  50. [50]

    Muniz, J. A. et al., Repeated ancilla reuse for logical com- putation on a neutral atom quantum computer, arXiv (2025), 2506.09936 [quant-ph]

  51. [51]

    Li, Y. et al. , Fast, continuous and coherent atom re- placement in a neutral atom qubit array, arXiv (2025), 2506.15633 [quant-ph]

  52. [52]

    Kim, D. et al. , Large-scale uniform optical focus array generation with a phase spatial light modulator, Opt. Lett. 44, 3178 (2019)

  53. [53]

    H. Kim, M. Kim, W. Lee, and J. Ahn, Gerchberg-Saxton algorithm for fast and efficient atom rearrangement in optical tweezer traps, Opt. Express 27, 2184 (2019)

  54. [54]

    Ebadi, S. et al. , Quantum phases of matter on a 256- atom programmable quantum simulator, Nature 595, 227 (2021)

  55. [55]

    Tomita, T. et al. , Atom camera: Super-resolution scan- ning microscope of a light pattern with a single ultracold atom, arXiv (2024), 2410.03241 [physics.atom-ph]

  56. [56]

    et al., Λ-enhanced grey molasses on the D2 trans- ition of Rubidium-87 atoms, Scientific Reports 8, 1301 (2018)

    Rosi, S. et al., Λ-enhanced grey molasses on the D2 trans- ition of Rubidium-87 atoms, Scientific Reports 8, 1301 (2018)

  57. [57]

    Walhout, J

    M. Walhout, J. Dalibard, S. L. Rolston, and W. D. Phil- lips, σ+–σ− Optical molasses in a longitudinal magnetic field, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 9, 1997 (1992)

  58. [58]

    S. K. Pampel, M. Marinelli, M. O. Brown, J. P. D’Incao, and C. A. Regal, Quantifying Light-Assisted Collisions in Optical Tweezers across the Hyperfine Spectrum, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 013202 (2025)

  59. [59]

    Levine, H. et al. , Dispersive optical systems for scalable Raman driving of hyperfine qubits, Phys. Rev. A 105, 032618 (2022)

  60. [60]

    coupling

    Neuhaus, L. et al. , Python Red Pitaya Lockbox (PyRPL): An open source software package for digital feedback control in quantum optics experiments, Review of Scientific Instruments 95, 033003 (2024). 9 METHODS V acuum System A simplified schematic of our vacuum system is shown in ED Fig. 1a. The system consists of a MOT chamber and a science chamber, sepa...