pith. sign in

arxiv: 2509.12124 · v2 · submitted 2025-09-15 · ⚛️ physics.atom-ph · quant-ph

Loading and Imaging Atom Arrays via Electromagnetically Induced Transparency

Emily H. Qiu , Tamara \v{S}umarac , Peiran Niu , Shai Tsesses , Fadi Wassaf , David C. Spierings , Meng-Wei Chen , Mehmet T. Uysal
show 4 more authors
Audrey Bartlett Adrian J. Menssen Mikhail D. Lukin Vladan Vuleti\'c
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 16:37 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.atom-ph quant-ph
keywords atom arraysEIT coolingfluorescence imagingmagnetic fieldneutral atomsreadout fidelityquantum processorssurvival probability
0
0 comments X

The pith

Neutral atom arrays can be loaded and imaged in finite magnetic fields by combining EIT cooling with fluorescence imaging.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a technique to image and prepare 87Rb atom arrays in a finite magnetic field by combining EIT cooling with fluorescence imaging. This achieves an average readout fidelity of 99.7% at 98.2% survival probability and up to 68% single-atom loading probability in a 2.3 G field, with performance holding at fields up to 10 G. A model is developed to predict survival probability that agrees with other atom array experiments. The approach cools atoms in both axial and radial directions and supports future continuously operated neutral atom quantum processors and sensors.

Core claim

Integrating EIT cooling with fluorescence imaging allows preparation and imaging of neutral atom arrays in finite magnetic fields, reaching 99.7(1)% readout fidelity with 98.2(3)% survival and 68(2)% loading probability at 2.3 G, validated to 10 G, while cooling both axial and radial motions and providing a predictive model for survival.

What carries the argument

Electromagnetically induced transparency cooling combined with fluorescence imaging to damp motion and enable high-fidelity detection in magnetic fields.

If this is right

  • High readout fidelity and survival rates enable reliable state detection for quantum operations without zeroing the magnetic field.
  • The survival probability model can guide optimization in other neutral atom array experiments.
  • Cooling in both axial and radial directions improves atom control for extended quantum computations.
  • Operation at fields up to 10 G broadens compatibility with applications requiring nonzero magnetic fields.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The method may integrate with magnetic-field-dependent components like certain quantum sensors or hybrid quantum systems.
  • Scaling to larger arrays or different species could extend its use in continuously running quantum processors.

Load-bearing premise

The EIT cooling process effectively damps motion in both axial and radial directions without introducing unaccounted heating or loss channels when a finite magnetic field is applied.

What would settle it

Measuring readout fidelity and survival probability at a magnetic field where the EIT resonance condition is deliberately detuned or at fields much higher than 10 G to check for degradation beyond the reported performance.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.12124 by Adrian J. Menssen, Audrey Bartlett, David C. Spierings, Emily H. Qiu, Fadi Wassaf, Mehmet T. Uysal, Meng-Wei Chen, Mikhail D. Lukin, Peiran Niu, Shai Tsesses, Tamara \v{S}umarac, Vladan Vuleti\'c.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: b shows histograms of subsequent images with zero or one atom in an array of 10 traps, from which we extract an average fidelity of 99.6(3) % to distinguish a single atom from the background. During 70 ms of imaging, we collect on average 100 photons per atom, consistent with our estimated imaging beam scattering rate (see SM [45]) combined with our estimated collec￾tion (3.3 %) and overall detection effic… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Arrays of neutral atoms present a promising system for quantum computing, quantum sensors, and other applications, several of which would profit from the ability to load, cool, and image the atoms in a finite magnetic field. In this work, we develop a technique to image and prepare $^{87}$Rb atom arrays in a finite magnetic field by combining EIT cooling with fluorescence imaging. We achieve an average readout fidelity of $99.7(1)\,\%$ at $98.2(3)\,\%$ survival probability and up to $68(2)\%$ single-atom stochastic loading probability in a 2.3 G magnetic field, with performance validated at fields up to 10 G. We further develop a model to predict the survival probability, which also agrees well with several other atom array experiments. Our technique cools both the axial and radial directions, and will enable future continuously-operated neutral atom quantum processors and quantum sensors.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports an experimental technique for loading and imaging 87Rb atom arrays in finite magnetic fields by combining EIT cooling with fluorescence imaging. Key results include an average readout fidelity of 99.7(1)% at 98.2(3)% survival probability, stochastic single-atom loading up to 68(2)% at 2.3 G, and performance validated up to 10 G. A model for survival probability is presented that agrees with data from this and other atom-array experiments. The work claims that the method cools both axial and radial directions and enables continuously operated neutral-atom processors and sensors.

Significance. If the central experimental claims hold, the result is significant because it removes a practical barrier to operating neutral-atom arrays in finite B fields, which is required for many quantum-sensing and continuously driven quantum-computing protocols. The reported fidelities and survival rates are competitive with state-of-the-art zero-field demonstrations, and the survival-probability model provides a useful predictive tool that matches independent experiments. The explicit demonstration of simultaneous axial and radial cooling under EIT is a concrete technical advance.

major comments (2)
  1. [§4] §4 (EIT cooling and imaging section): the statement that EIT damps motion in both axial and radial directions without introducing unaccounted heating or loss channels at finite B is load-bearing for the headline fidelity and survival numbers, yet the text provides only qualitative arguments; quantitative bounds on residual heating rates or loss channels (e.g., from measured temperature or lifetime data) should be added to support the claim.
  2. [Fig. 3] Fig. 3 / survival model: the model is stated to agree with several other atom-array experiments, but the comparison is shown only for a subset of data points; a table or supplementary figure listing the exact parameters (trap depth, imaging time, B-field) used for each external dataset would make the agreement falsifiable and strengthen the model’s generality.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the array size (number of sites) and typical atom number are not stated; adding these numbers would give immediate context for the reported loading probability and fidelity.
  2. [Methods] Methods: the precise EIT laser detunings, intensities, and polarization configuration at 2.3 G and at 10 G should be tabulated so that the cooling performance can be reproduced.
  3. [Fig. 2] Fig. 2 caption: the magnetic-field value used for each panel should be stated explicitly rather than only in the main text.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the positive assessment recommending minor revision. The comments are constructive and we address each one below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§4] §4 (EIT cooling and imaging section): the statement that EIT damps motion in both axial and radial directions without introducing unaccounted heating or loss channels at finite B is load-bearing for the headline fidelity and survival numbers, yet the text provides only qualitative arguments; quantitative bounds on residual heating rates or loss channels (e.g., from measured temperature or lifetime data) should be added to support the claim.

    Authors: We agree that quantitative bounds would strengthen the manuscript. In the revised version we will add measured atomic temperatures after EIT imaging together with heating-rate estimates derived from the observed survival probability and trap lifetime. These data will provide explicit upper bounds on any residual heating or loss channels at finite magnetic field and will support the claim of simultaneous axial and radial cooling. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Fig. 3] Fig. 3 / survival model: the model is stated to agree with several other atom-array experiments, but the comparison is shown only for a subset of data points; a table or supplementary figure listing the exact parameters (trap depth, imaging time, B-field) used for each external dataset would make the agreement falsifiable and strengthen the model’s generality.

    Authors: We thank the referee for this suggestion. In the revised manuscript we will add a supplementary table that lists the trap depth, imaging time, magnetic-field strength, and survival probability for every external dataset included in the model comparison. This will render the agreement fully verifiable and strengthen the claimed generality of the survival-probability model. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; experimental measurements and validated model are self-contained

full rationale

The paper reports direct experimental results on EIT-based cooling, imaging, and stochastic loading of 87Rb atom arrays in finite magnetic fields, with readout fidelity, survival probability, and loading probability obtained from measurements rather than derived predictions. The survival-probability model is presented as agreeing with the current data and independent prior experiments; no equations or steps are shown that reduce a claimed prediction to a fitted parameter by construction, nor do self-citations supply load-bearing uniqueness theorems or ansatzes. The work is therefore an empirical demonstration whose central claims rest on statistical outcomes and cross-experiment consistency, not on internal redefinitions or self-referential derivations.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Paper is primarily an experimental demonstration; the survival-probability model likely contains fitted parameters, but specific values and assumptions are not provided in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5741 in / 991 out tokens · 39691 ms · 2026-05-18T16:37:48.233348+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Achieving High Filling of an Optical Lattice by Light-Assisted Redistribution of Atoms

    physics.atom-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Light-assisted redistribution via blue-detuned pumping during Raman sideband cooling achieves 70-80% single-atom occupancy in optical lattices while retaining over 50% of atoms involved in collisions.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

64 extracted references · 64 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Ebadi, T

    S. Ebadi, T. T. Wang, H. Levine, A. Keesling, G. Se- meghini, A. Omran, D. Bluvstein, R. Samajdar, H. Pich- ler, W. W. Ho, S. Choi, S. Sachdev, M. Greiner, V. Vuleti´ c, and M. D. Lukin, Quantum phases of matter on a 256-atom programmable quantum simulator, Nature 595, 227 (2021)

    work page 2021

  2. [2]

    Scholl, M

    P. Scholl, M. Schuler, H. J. Williams, A. A. Eberharter, D. Barredo, K.-N. Schymik, V. Lienhard, L.-P. Henry, T. C. Lang, T. Lahaye,et al., Quantum simulation of 2d antiferromagnets with hundreds of rydberg atoms, Na- ture595, 233 (2021)

    work page 2021

  3. [3]

    Semeghini, H

    G. Semeghini, H. Levine, A. Keesling, S. Ebadi, T. T. Wang, D. Bluvstein, R. Verresen, H. Pichler, M. Kali- nowski, R. Samajdar, A. Omran, S. Sachdev, A. Vish- wanath, M. Greiner, V. Vuleti´ c, and M. D. Lukin, Prob- ing topological spin liquids on a programmable quantum simulator, Science374, 1242 (2021)

    work page 2021

  4. [4]

    Bluvstein, H

    D. Bluvstein, H. Levine, G. Semeghini, T. T. Wang, S. Ebadi, M. Kalinowski, A. Keesling, N. Maskara, H. Pichler, M. Greiner, V. Vuletic, and M. D. Lukin, A quantum processor based on coherent transport of en- tangled atom arrays, Nature604, 451 (2022)

    work page 2022

  5. [5]

    T. M. Graham, Y. Song, J. Scott, C. Poole, L. Phutti- tarn, K. Jooya, P. Eichler, X. Jiang, A. Marra, B. Grinke- meyer, M. Kwon, M. Ebert, J. Cherek, M. T. Licht- man, M. Gillette, J. Gilbert, D. Bowman, T. Ballance, C. Campbell, E. D. Dahl, O. Crawford, N. S. Blunt, B. Rogers, T. Noel, and M. Saffman, Multi-qubit en- tanglement and algorithms on a neutra...

    work page 2022

  6. [6]

    Bornet, G

    G. Bornet, G. Emperauger, C. Chen, B. Ye, M. Block, M. Bintz, J. A. Boyd, D. Barredo, T. Comparin, F. Mezzacapo, T. Roscilde, T. Lahaye, N. Y. Yao, and A. Browaeys, Scalable spin squeezing in a dipolar rydberg atom array, Nature621, 728 (2023)

    work page 2023

  7. [7]

    W. J. Eckner, N. Darkwah Oppong, A. Cao, A. W. Young, W. R. Milner, J. M. Robinson, J. Ye, and A. M. Kaufman, Realizing spin squeezing with rydberg interac- tions in an optical clock, Nature621, 734 (2023)

    work page 2023

  8. [8]

    J. A. Hines, S. V. Rajagopal, G. L. Moreau, M. D. Wahrman, N. A. Lewis, O. Markovi´ c, and M. Schleier- Smith, Spin squeezing by rydberg dressing in an array of atomic ensembles, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 063401 (2023)

    work page 2023

  9. [9]

    C. S. Adams, J. D. Pritchard, and J. P. Shaffer, Ry- dberg atom quantum technologies, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics53, 012002 (2019)

    work page 2019

  10. [10]

    H. J. Manetsch, G. Nomura, E. Bataille, K. H. Leung, X. Lv, and M. Endres, A tweezer array with 6100 highly coherent atomic qubits (2024), arXiv:2403.12021 [quant- ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  11. [11]

    Pichard, D

    G. Pichard, D. Lim, E. Bloch, J. Vaneecloo, L. Boura- chot, G.-J. Both, G. M´ eriaux, S. Dutartre, R. Hostein, J. Paris, B. Ximenez, A. Signoles, A. Browaeys, T. La- haye, and D. Dreon, Rearrangement of individual atoms in a 2000-site optical-tweezer array at cryogenic temper- atures, Phys. Rev. Appl.22, 024073 (2024)

    work page 2000

  12. [12]

    S. J. Evered, D. Bluvstein, M. Kalinowski, S. Ebadi, T. Manovitz, H. Zhou, S. H. Li, A. A. Geim, T. T. Wang, N. Maskara, H. Levine, G. Semeghini, M. Greiner, V. Vuleti´ c, and M. D. Lukin, High-fidelity parallel entan- gling gates on a neutral-atom quantum computer, Nature 622, 268 (2023)

    work page 2023

  13. [13]

    Scholl, A

    P. Scholl, A. L. Shaw, R. B.-S. Tsai, R. Finkelstein, J. Choi, and M. Endres, Erasure conversion in a high- fidelity rydberg quantum simulator, Nature622, 273 (2023)

    work page 2023

  14. [14]

    S. Ma, G. Liu, P. Peng, B. Zhang, S. Jandura, J. Claes, A. P. Burgers, G. Pupillo, S. Puri, and J. D. Thompson, High-fidelity gates and mid-circuit erasure conversion in an atomic qubit, Nature622, 279 (2023)

    work page 2023

  15. [15]

    Radnaev, W

    A. Radnaev, W. Chung, D. Cole, D. Mason, T. Bal- lance, M. Bedalov, D. Belknap, M. Berman, M. Blakely, I. Bloomfield,et al., A universal neutral-atom quantum computer with individual optical addressing and non- destructive readout, arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.08288 (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  16. [16]

    Senoo, A

    A. Senoo, A. Baumg¨ artner, J. W. Lis, G. M. Vaidya, Z. Zeng, G. Giudici, H. Pichler, and A. M. Kauf- man, High-fidelity entanglement and coherent multi- qubit mapping in an atom array (2025), arXiv:2506.13632 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  17. [17]

    Bluvstein, S

    D. Bluvstein, S. J. Evered, A. A. Geim, S. H. Li, H. Zhou, T. Manovitz, S. Ebadi, M. Cain, M. Kali- nowski, D. Hangleiter, J. P. Bonilla Ataides, N. Maskara, I. Cong, X. Gao, P. Sales Rodriguez, T. Karolyshyn, G. Semeghini, M. J. Gullans, M. Greiner, V. Vuleti´ c, and M. D. Lukin, Logical quantum processor based on reconfigurable atom arrays, Nature626, 58 (2024)

    work page 2024

  18. [18]

    Bluvstein, A

    D. Bluvstein, A. A. Geim, S. H. Li, S. J. Evered, J. P. B. Ataides, G. Baranes, A. Gu, T. Manovitz, M. Xu, M. Kalinowski, S. Majidy, C. Kokail, N. Maskara, E. C. Trapp, L. M. Stewart, S. Hollerith, H. Zhou, M. J. Gullans, S. F. Yelin, M. Greiner, V. Vuletic, M. Cain, and M. D. Lukin, Architectural mechanisms of a universal fault-tolerant quantum computer ...

    work page arXiv 2025

  19. [19]

    Levine, A

    H. Levine, A. Keesling, G. Semeghini, A. Omran, T. T. Wang, S. Ebadi, H. Bernien, M. Greiner, V. Vuleti´ c, H. Pichler,et al., Parallel implementation of high-fidelity multiqubit gates with neutral atoms, Physical review let- ters123, 170503 (2019)

    work page 2019

  20. [20]

    M. A. Norcia, H. Kim, W. B. Cairncross, M. Stone, A. Ryou, M. Jaffe, M. O. Brown, K. Barnes, P. Battaglino, T. C. Bohdanowicz, A. Brown, K. Cas- sella, C.-A. Chen, R. Coxe, D. Crow, J. Epstein, C. Griger, E. Halperin, F. Hummel, A. M. W. Jones, J. M. Kindem, J. King, K. Kotru, J. Lauigan, M. Li, M. Lu, E. Megidish, J. Marjanovic, M. Mc- Donald, T. Mittiga...

    work page 2024

  21. [21]

    W. Huie, L. Li, N. Chen, X. Hu, Z. Jia, W. K. C. Sun, and J. P. Covey, Repetitive readout and real-time control of nuclear spin qubits in 171Yb atoms, PRX Quantum4, 030337 (2023)

    work page 2023

  22. [22]

    Y. Li, Y. Bao, M. Peper, C. Li, and J. D. Thompson, Fast, continuous and coherent atom replacement in a neutral atom qubit array (2025), arXiv:2506.15633 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  23. [23]

    J. W. Lis, A. Senoo, W. F. McGrew, F. R¨ onchen, A. Jenkins, and A. M. Kaufman, Midcircuit operations using the omg architecture in neutral atom arrays, Phys. Rev. X13, 041035 (2023)

    work page 2023

  24. [24]

    Gyger, M

    F. Gyger, M. Ammenwerth, R. Tao, H. Timme, S. Sni- girev, I. Bloch, and J. Zeiher, Continuous operation of large-scale atom arrays in optical lattices (2024), arXiv:2402.04994 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  25. [26]

    T. M. Graham, L. Phuttitarn, R. Chinnarasu, Y. Song, C. Poole, K. Jooya, J. Scott, A. Scott, P. Eichler, and M. Saffman, Midcircuit measurements on a single-species neutral alkali atom quantum processor, Phys. Rev. X13, 041051 (2023)

    work page 2023

  26. [27]

    M. A. Norcia, W. B. Cairncross, K. Barnes, P. Battaglino, A. Brown, M. O. Brown, K. Cassella, C.-A. Chen, R. Coxe, D. Crow, J. Epstein, C. Griger, A. M. W. Jones, H. Kim, J. M. Kindem, J. King, S. S. Kondov, K. Kotru, J. Lauigan, M. Li, M. Lu, E. Megidish, J. Marjanovic, M. McDonald, T. Mittiga, J. A. Muniz, S. Narayanaswami, C. Nishiguchi, R. Noter- mans...

    work page 2023

  27. [28]

    N.-C. Chiu, E. C. Trapp, J. Guo, M. H. Abobeih, L. M. Stewart, S. Hollerith, P. Stroganov, M. Kalinowski, A. A. Geim, S. J. Evered, S. H. Li, L. M. Peters, D. Bluvstein, T. T. Wang, M. Greiner, V. Vuleti´ c, and M. D. Lukin, Continuous operation of a coherent 3,000-qubit system (2025), arXiv:2506.20660 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  28. [29]

    B. J. Lester, A. M. Kaufman, and C. A. Regal, Ra- man cooling imaging: Detecting single atoms near their ground state of motion, Phys. Rev. A90, 011804 (2014)

    work page 2014

  29. [30]

    Y. S. Patil, S. Chakram, L. M. Aycock, and M. Vengalat- tore, Nondestructive imaging of an ultracold lattice gas, Phys. Rev. A90, 033422 (2014)

    work page 2014

  30. [31]

    K. N. Blodgett, D. Peana, S. S. Phatak, L. M. Terry, M. P. Montes, and J. D. Hood, Imaging a 6Li atom in an optical tweezer 2000 times with Λ-enhanced gray mo- lasses, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 083001 (2023)

    work page 2000

  31. [32]

    Ang’ong’a, C

    J. Ang’ong’a, C. Huang, J. P. Covey, and B. Gadway, Gray molasses cooling of 39K atoms in optical tweezers, Phys. Rev. Res.4, 013240 (2022)

    work page 2022

  32. [33]

    Haller, J

    E. Haller, J. Hudson, A. Kelly, D. A. Cotta, B. Peaude- cerf, G. D. Bruce, and S. Kuhr, Single-atom imaging of fermions in a quantum-gas microscope, Nature Physics 11, 738 (2015)

    work page 2015

  33. [34]

    Nikolov, E

    B. Nikolov, E. Diamond-Hitchcock, J. Bass, N. L. R. Spong, and J. D. Pritchard, Randomized benchmarking using nondestructive readout in a two-dimensional atom array, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 030602 (2023)

    work page 2023

  34. [35]

    M. Kwon, M. F. Ebert, T. G. Walker, and M. Saffman, Parallel low-loss measurement of multiple atomic qubits, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 180504 (2017)

    work page 2017

  35. [36]

    Morigi, J

    G. Morigi, J. Eschner, and C. H. Keitel, Ground state laser cooling using electromagnetically induced trans- parency, Phys. Rev. Lett.85, 4458 (2000)

    work page 2000

  36. [37]

    C. H. Chow, B. L. Ng, V. Prakash, and C. Kurtsiefer, Fano resonance in excitation spectroscopy and cooling of an optically trapped single atom, Phys. Rev. Res.6, 023154 (2024)

    work page 2024

  37. [38]

    de L´ es´ eleuc, D

    S. de L´ es´ eleuc, D. Barredo, V. Lienhard, A. Browaeys, and T. Lahaye, Analysis of imperfections in the coherent optical excitation of single atoms to rydberg states, Phys- ical Review A97, 10.1103/physreva.97.053803 (2018)

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.97.053803 2018

  38. [39]

    Zhang, T.-W

    Z. Zhang, T.-W. Hsu, T. Y. Tan, D. H. Slichter, A. M. Kaufman, M. Marinelli, and C. A. Regal, High optical access cryogenic system for rydberg atom arrays with a 3000-second trap lifetime, PRX Quantum6, 020337 (2025)

    work page 2025

  39. [40]

    J. P. Covey, I. S. Madjarov, A. Cooper, and M. En- dres, 2000-times repeated imaging of strontium atoms in clock-magic tweezer arrays, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 173201 (2019)

    work page 2000

  40. [41]

    L. W. Cheuk, M. A. Nichols, M. Okan, T. Gersdorf, V. V. Ramasesh, W. S. Bakr, T. Lompe, and M. W. Zwierlein, Quantum-gas microscope for fermionic atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett.114, 193001 (2015)

    work page 2015

  41. [42]

    M. O. Brown, T. Thiele, C. Kiehl, T.-W. Hsu, and C. A. Regal, Gray-molasses optical-tweezer loading: Control- ling collisions for scaling atom-array assembly, Phys. Rev. X9, 011057 (2019)

    work page 2019

  42. [43]

    P. B. Wigley, P. J. Everitt, A. van den Hengel, J. W. Bastian, M. A. Sooriyabandara, G. D. McDonald, K. S. Hardman, C. D. Quinlivan, P. Manju, C. C. N. Kuhn, I. R. Petersen, A. N. Luiten, J. J. Hope, N. P. Robins, and M. R. Hush, Fast machine-learning online optimization of ultra-cold-atom experiments, Scientific Reports6, 25890 (2016)

    work page 2016

  43. [44]

    W. Xu, T. ˇSumarac, E. H. Qiu, M. L. Peters, S. H. Cant´ u, Z. Li, A. Menssen, M. D. Lukin, S. Colombo, and V. Vuleti´ c, Bose-einstein condensation by polariza- tion gradient laser cooling, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 233401 (2024)

    work page 2024

  44. [45]

    See supplemental material at [url] will be inserted by pub- lisher]

    work page

  45. [46]

    Schlosser, G

    N. Schlosser, G. Reymond, I. Protsenko, and P. Grangier, Sub-poissonian loading of single atoms in a microscopic dipole trap, Nature411, 1024 (2001)

    work page 2001

  46. [47]

    Y. H. Fung, P. Sompet, and M. F. Andersen, Single atoms preparation using light-assisted collisions, Technologies 4, 10.3390/technologies4010004 (2016)

    work page doi:10.3390/technologies4010004 2016

  47. [48]

    B. J. Lester, N. Luick, A. M. Kaufman, C. M. Reynolds, and C. A. Regal, Rapid production of uniformly filled arrays of neutral atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 073003 (2015)

    work page 2015

  48. [49]

    Gr¨ unzweig, A

    T. Gr¨ unzweig, A. Hilliard, M. McGovern, and M. F. An- dersen, Near-deterministic preparation of a single atom in an optical microtrap, Nature Physics6, 951 (2010). 8

    work page 2010

  49. [50]

    S. Rosi, A. Burchianti, S. Conclave, D. S. Naik, G. Roati, C. Fort, and F. Minardi,λ-enhanced grey molasses on the d2 transition of rubidium-87 atoms, Scientific Reports8, 1301 (2018)

    work page 2018

  50. [51]

    Ebadi,Quantum simulation and computation with two- dimensional arrays of neutral atoms, Phd thesis, Harvard University (2023)

    S. Ebadi,Quantum simulation and computation with two- dimensional arrays of neutral atoms, Phd thesis, Harvard University (2023)

    work page 2023

  51. [52]

    Tuchendler, A

    C. Tuchendler, A. M. Lance, A. Browaeys, Y. R. P. Sor- tais, and P. Grangier, Energy distribution and cooling of a single atom in an optical tweezer, Phys. Rev. A78, 033425 (2008)

    work page 2008

  52. [53]

    Schymik, S

    K.-N. Schymik, S. Pancaldi, F. Nogrette, D. Barredo, J. Paris, A. Browaeys, and T. Lahaye, Single atoms with 6000-second trapping lifetimes in optical-tweezer arrays at cryogenic temperatures, Phys. Rev. Appl.16, 034013 (2021)

    work page 2021

  53. [54]

    A. J. Matthies, J. M. Mortlock, L. A. McArd, A. P. Raghuram, A. D. Innes, P. D. Gregory, S. L. Bromley, and S. L. Cornish, Long-distance optical-conveyor-belt transport of ultracold 133Cs and 87Rb atoms, Phys. Rev. A109, 023321 (2024)

    work page 2024

  54. [55]

    S. K. Pampel, M. Marinelli, M. O. Brown, J. P. D’Incao, and C. A. Regal, Quantifying light-assisted collisions in optical tweezers across the hyperfine spectrum, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 013202 (2025)

    work page 2025

  55. [56]

    Cohen-Tannoudji, J

    C. Cohen-Tannoudji, J. Dupont-Roc, and G. Grynberg, Atom-Photon Interactions: Basic Processes and Applica- tions(John Wiley & Sons, 1998)

    work page 1998

  56. [57]

    Mitroy and M

    J. Mitroy and M. W. J. Bromley, Semiempirical calcu- lation of van der waals coefficients for alkali-metal and alkaline-earth-metal atoms, Phys. Rev. A68, 052714 (2003)

    work page 2003

  57. [58]

    H. S. W. Massey and C. B. O. Mohr, Free paths and transport phenomena in gases and the quantum theory of collisions. ii. the determination of the laws of force be- tween atoms and molecules, Proceedings of the Royal So- ciety of London. Series A, Containing Papers of a Math- ematical and Physical Character144, 188 (1934)

    work page 1934

  58. [59]

    R. B. Bernstein, Semiclassical analysis of the extrema in the velocity dependence of total elastic-scattering cross sections: Relation to the bound states, J. Chem. Phys. 38, 2599 (1963)

    work page 1963

  59. [60]

    D. J. Croucher and J. L. Clark, Total collision cross sec- tions and van der waals constants for alkali atom inter- actions with atoms and non-reactive diatomic molecules at thermal energies, J. Phys. B: Atom. Mol. Phys.2, 603 (1969)

    work page 1969

  60. [61]

    B. Hu, J. Sinclair, E. Bytyqi, M. Chong, A. Rudelis, J. Ramette, Z. Vendeiro, and V. Vuleti´ c, Site-selective cavity readout and classical error correction of a 5-bit atomic register, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 120801 (2025)

    work page 2025

  61. [62]

    Private communication

    work page

  62. [63]

    Schymik,Scaling-up the Tweezer Platform - Trap- ping Arrays of Single Atoms in a Cryogenic Environment, Theses, Universit´ e Paris-Saclay (2022)

    K.-N. Schymik,Scaling-up the Tweezer Platform - Trap- ping Arrays of Single Atoms in a Cryogenic Environment, Theses, Universit´ e Paris-Saclay (2022)

    work page 2022

  63. [64]

    G. Wang, D. C. Spierings, M. L. Peters, M.-W. Chen, U. Deli´ c, and V. Vuleti´ c, Programmable few-atom bragg scattering and ground-state cooling in a cavity (2025), arXiv:2508.10748 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  64. [65]

    oUVgMeVdCJ9sKimVFyzKIBn8m3A=

    M. L. Peters, G. Wang, D. C. Spierings, N. Drucker, B. Hu, M.-W. Chen, Y.-T. Chen, and V. Vuleti´ c, Cavity- enabled real-time observation of individual atomic colli- sions, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 093402 (2025). 9 SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL EXPERIMENTAL SETUP An array of optical tweezers is generated with a spa- tial light modulator (SLM; Hamamatsu x13138-02) fo...

    work page 2025