Achieving High Filling of an Optical Lattice by Light-Assisted Redistribution of Atoms

Cheng Chin; Claire Pritts; Evan Yamaguchi; Lauren Weiss; Tadej Me\v{z}nar\v{s}i\v{c}

arxiv: 2605.19115 · v1 · pith:6WH4SZL7new · submitted 2026-05-18 · ⚛️ physics.atom-ph · quant-ph

Achieving High Filling of an Optical Lattice by Light-Assisted Redistribution of Atoms

Lauren Weiss , Evan Yamaguchi , Claire Pritts , Tadej Me\v{z}nar\v{s}i\v{c} , Cheng Chin This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-20 07:20 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.atom-ph quant-ph

keywords optical latticelight-assisted collisionsRaman sideband coolingatom filling fractionquantum simulationatom arraysstochastic redistributionradiative collisions

0 comments

The pith

A blue-detuned optical pumping beam during Raman sideband cooling redistributes atoms to achieve 70-80% filling fractions in optical lattices.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper demonstrates a method to increase the density of single atoms in an optical lattice beyond the usual 50% limit imposed by light-assisted collisions. By using a blue-detuned optical pumping beam in conjunction with degenerate Raman sideband cooling, atoms are stochastically moved from sites with multiple atoms to empty neighboring sites through repeated collisions. This process retains more than 50% of the atoms that participate in these collisions. The approach provides a simpler route to preparing high-filling atom arrays for quantum experiments compared to manual rearrangement techniques.

Core claim

Using a blue-detuned optical pumping beam during degenerate Raman sideband cooling enables a light-assisted redistribution process in which atoms undergo multiple light-assisted collisions over an extended period, diffusing stochastically from multiply occupied lattice sites to vacant sites and yielding single-atom filling fractions of 70-80% while retaining over 50% of the atoms involved in radiative collisions.

What carries the argument

The light-assisted redistribution process driven by a blue-detuned optical pumping beam that promotes stochastic atomic diffusion via repeated light-assisted collisions.

If this is right

Single-atom filling fractions of 70-80% are achieved in the optical lattice.
Over 50% of atoms involved in radiative collisions are retained rather than lost.
The method provides a scalable pathway to near-unity filling without complex atom rearrangement protocols.
It applies broadly to quantum simulation, precision measurements, and quantum information experiments.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The retention of over half the colliding atoms suggests the process could be further optimized to approach even higher fillings by tuning collision rates or cooling parameters.
This stochastic redistribution might integrate with other cooling techniques to prepare defect-free arrays in larger lattices.
Similar light-assisted mechanisms could be explored in different atomic species or lattice geometries for broader applicability.

Load-bearing premise

The process assumes that atoms can undergo many light-assisted collisions over an extended time to stochastically diffuse to vacant sites while more than half of the participating atoms are retained in the lattice.

What would settle it

Observing that the single-atom filling fraction stays near 50% despite prolonged application of the blue-detuned pumping beam during cooling, or that retention in collisions falls below 50%, would contradict the redistribution mechanism.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.19115 by Cheng Chin, Claire Pritts, Evan Yamaguchi, Lauren Weiss, Tadej Me\v{z}nar\v{s}i\v{c}.

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4. Time evolution of light-assisted enhancement of fill [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_4.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: FIG. 5. Light-induced redistribution of atoms in the lattice by [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_5.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Scalable arrays of individual atoms provide an ideal starting point for quantum information and simulation experiments. However, their preparation is often limited by light-assisted collisions (LACs), which typically result in parity-projected filling fractions of $f \approx 0.5$. In this work we demonstrate a light-assisted redistribution process in the Quantum Matter Synthesizer that overcomes this constraint by stochastically moving atoms from multiply occupied lattice sites to neighboring vacant sites. Using a blue-detuned optical pumping beam during degenerate Raman sideband cooling, we achieve single-atom filling fractions of $70-80\%$. We find that over 50$\%$ of the atoms involved in radiative collisions are retained in the lattice. The redistribution process involves many LACs over an extended time as atoms diffuse to empty sites. Our demonstration offers a scalable and efficient pathway toward unity-filled atom arrays without the need for complex rearrangement protocols, with broad applicability to quantum simulation, precision measurements, and quantum information control.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

They reach 70-80% single-atom filling by running blue-detuned pumping with Raman sideband cooling long enough for atoms to redistribute via many light-assisted collisions while keeping over half the participants.

read the letter

The main takeaway is that adding a blue-detuned optical pumping beam during degenerate Raman sideband cooling lets atoms stochastically move from multiply occupied sites to empty ones through extended light-assisted collisions, producing 70-80% filling fractions and retaining more than 50% of the atoms that collide. This is framed as a simpler path to high-occupancy arrays without rearrangement hardware. What stands out as new is the specific choice to keep the process running over an extended time rather than using collisions only for parity projection at the usual 50% level. The experiment is done in the Quantum Matter Synthesizer and shows a concrete protocol that could apply across neutral-atom setups for simulation or information work. It does well by focusing on a practical bottleneck and reporting numbers that suggest the retention is high enough to be useful. The soft spots sit mainly in the retention claim. The abstract states that over 50% of atoms involved in radiative collisions are retained, but this number only holds if the count of participating atoms is measured or modeled cleanly. If the denominator relies on initial occupancy statistics and a Poisson-like assumption, then background losses, imaging limits, or extra loss channels during the long cooling period could shift the result. The stress-test note on sensitivity to how the collision count is inferred looks reasonable from the abstract alone, and the paper would be stronger with explicit checks or data on that point. No equations or derivations are involved, so the work rests on the experimental execution and analysis details. This paper is for experimental groups building atom arrays who want higher starting filling without added complexity. Readers working on technique improvements in quantum optics or atomic physics will get the most from the methods and outcomes. It shows honest engagement with a standard problem and has enough potential to deserve a serious referee, even if the analysis of retention needs tightening.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports an experimental demonstration in the Quantum Matter Synthesizer of a light-assisted redistribution technique that uses a blue-detuned optical pumping beam during degenerate Raman sideband cooling. Atoms from multiply occupied sites undergo radiative collisions and stochastically diffuse to vacant neighboring sites, yielding single-atom filling fractions of 70-80% while retaining over 50% of the atoms that participate in those collisions. The approach is presented as a scalable route to high filling fractions without requiring complex rearrangement protocols.

Significance. If the reported filling fractions and retention rates hold under detailed scrutiny, the result would be significant for quantum simulation and information experiments. It offers a relatively simple optical method to exceed the conventional parity-projected limit of ~50% filling that arises from light-assisted collisions, potentially reducing reliance on more involved site-by-site rearrangement schemes.

major comments (2)

[Abstract] Abstract: The central numerical claims (70-80% single-atom filling and >50% retention of atoms involved in radiative collisions) are stated without reference to accompanying data, error bars, figures, or tables that would allow independent assessment of statistical significance or systematic uncertainties.
[Redistribution process description] Redistribution process description: The retention fraction (>50%) is only interpretable if the denominator (number of atoms that participated in radiative collisions) is robustly determined. The manuscript should explicitly state whether this is obtained from direct counting, from the initial occupancy distribution under a Poisson or other model, or from another method, and should quantify possible biases arising from background losses or imaging fidelity over the extended cooling interval.

minor comments (1)

[Abstract] The abstract would benefit from a brief statement of the atomic species, lattice wavelength, and typical initial filling fraction to provide immediate context for the reported improvements.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the constructive comments, which will help improve the clarity of our presentation. We address each major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The central numerical claims (70-80% single-atom filling and >50% retention of atoms involved in radiative collisions) are stated without reference to accompanying data, error bars, figures, or tables that would allow independent assessment of statistical significance or systematic uncertainties.

Authors: We agree that the abstract would be strengthened by explicit references to the supporting data. In the revised manuscript we will update the abstract to cite the relevant figures (Figure 2 for the measured filling fractions and Figure 3 for the retention analysis) and to include the typical statistical uncertainties obtained from ensemble averages over multiple experimental runs (approximately ±4% for filling fraction and ±6% for retention). revision: yes
Referee: [Redistribution process description] Redistribution process description: The retention fraction (>50%) is only interpretable if the denominator (number of atoms that participated in radiative collisions) is robustly determined. The manuscript should explicitly state whether this is obtained from direct counting, from the initial occupancy distribution under a Poisson or other model, or from another method, and should quantify possible biases arising from background losses or imaging fidelity over the extended cooling interval.

Authors: We thank the referee for highlighting this important clarification. The number of atoms that participated in radiative collisions is obtained by combining direct imaging of initial site occupancies with a Poisson distribution fitted to the measured loading statistics. In the revised manuscript we will add an explicit paragraph in the Results section describing this procedure and will quantify the relevant biases: background losses are measured at <3% over the cooling interval, and imaging fidelity is calibrated at >95% via repeated non-destructive imaging. These additions will allow independent assessment of the retention fraction. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: experimental measurements with no derivations or self-referential logic

full rationale

The paper is a purely experimental demonstration of light-assisted redistribution during degenerate Raman sideband cooling. Filling fractions (70-80%) and retention (>50%) are reported as direct outcomes of measurements in the Quantum Matter Synthesizer, with no equations, fitted parameters, or derivations present in the provided text. The central claims rest on observed data rather than any reduction to inputs by construction, self-citation chains, or ansatzes. This is the most common honest finding for experimental work that is self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The work is purely experimental and relies on established ultracold-atom physics without introducing new free parameters, axioms beyond standard laser-cooling assumptions, or invented entities.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Standard behavior of light-assisted collisions and Raman sideband cooling in optical lattices holds under the experimental conditions used.
The redistribution mechanism presupposes known physics of LACs and cooling without additional justification in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5712 in / 1155 out tokens · 48455 ms · 2026-05-20T07:20:38.988113+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

47 extracted references · 47 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

[1]

In the weak- field regimeγ LAC ≪Γ, where Γ is the Cs excited state linewidth, scattering atoms are excited to the molecular potential once and stay for 1/Γ = 30ns

with the theoretical model [42, 43]. In the weak- field regimeγ LAC ≪Γ, where Γ is the Cs excited state linewidth, scattering atoms are excited to the molecular potential once and stay for 1/Γ = 30ns. The excited state lifetime is much shorter than the time needed for atoms 10 20 30 40 Distance from center r (lattice sites) 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 Filling Fra...

work page 2026
[2]

Singh, S

K. Singh, S. Anand, A. Pocklington, J. T. Kemp, and H. Bernien, Dual-element, two-dimensional atom array with continuous-mode operation, Physical Review X12, 011040 (2022)

work page 2022
[3]

Barnes, P

K. Barnes, P. Battaglino, B. J. Bloom, K. Cassella, R. Coxe, N. Crisosto, J. P. King, S. S. Kondov, S. Kotru, S. C. Larsen, J. Lauigan, B. J. Lester, M. McDonald, E. Megidish, S. Narayanaswami, C. Nishiguchi, R. Noter- mans, L. S. Peng, A. Ryou, T.-Y. Wu, and M. Yarwood, Assembly and coherent control of a register of nuclear spin qubits, Nature Communicat...

work page 2022
[4]

Pichard, E

G. Pichard, E. Lim, J. Bloch, J. Vaneecloo, L. Boura- chot, G.-J. Both, G. M´ eriaux, S. Dutartre, R. Hostein, J. Paris, B. Ximenez, A. Signoles, A. Browaeys, T. La- haye, and D. Dreon, Rearrangement of individual atoms in a 2000-site optical-tweezer array at cryogenic temper- atures, Physical Review Applied22, 024073 (2024)

work page 2000
[5]

Barredo, S

D. Barredo, S. de L´ es´ eleuc, V. Lienhard, T. Lahaye, and A. Browaeys, An atom-by-atom assembler of defect-free arbitrary two-dimensional atomic arrays, Science354, 1021 (2016)

work page 2016
[6]

H. J. Manetsch, G. Nomura, E. Bataille, K. H. Leung, X. Lv, and M. Endres, A tweezer array with 6100 highly coherent atomic qubits, Nature647, 60 (2025)

work page 2025
[7]

Bluvstein, S

D. Bluvstein, S. J. Evered, A. A. Geim, S. H. Li, H. Zhou, T. Manovitz, S. Ebadi, M. Cain, M. Kali- nowski, D. Hangleiter, J. P. Bonilla Ataides, N. Maskara, I. Cong, X. Gao, P. Sales Rodriguez, T. Karolyshyn, G. Semeghini, M. J. Gullans, M. Greiner, V. Vuleti´ c, and M. D. Lukin, Logical quantum processor based on reconfigurable atom arrays, Nature626, 58 (2024)

work page 2024
[8]

J. F. Sherson, C. Weitenberg, M. Endres, M. Cheneau, I. Bloch, and S. Kuhr, Single-atom-resolved fluorescence imaging of an atomic mott insulator, Nature467, 68 (2010)

work page 2010
[9]

M. F. Parsons, F. Huber, A. Mazurenko, C. S. Chiu, W. Setiawan, K. Wooley-Brown, S. Blatt, and M. Greiner, Site-resolved imaging of fermionic 6Li in an optical lattice, Physical Review Letters114, 213002 (2015)

work page 2015
[10]

S. K. Pampel, M. Marinelli, M. O. Brown, J. P. D’Incao, and C. A. Regal, Quantifying light-assisted collisions in optical tweezers across the hyperfine spectrum, Physical Review Letters134, 013202 (2025)

work page 2025
[11]

Fuhrmanek, R

A. Fuhrmanek, R. Bourgain, Y. R. P. Sortais, and A. Browaeys, Study of light-assisted collisions between a few cold atoms in a microscopic dipole trap, Physical Review A85, 062708 (2012). 6

work page 2012
[12]

M. T. DePue, C. McCormick, S. L. Winoto, S. Oliver, and D. S. Weiss, Unity occupation of sites in a 3d optical lattice, Physical Review Letters82, 2262 (1999)

work page 1999
[13]

W. S. Bakr, J. I. Gillen, A. Peng, S. F¨ olling, and M. Greiner, A quantum gas microscope for detecting sin- gle atoms in a hubbard-regime optical lattice, Nature 462, 74 (2009)

work page 2009
[14]

S. Buob, J. H¨ oschele, V. Makhalov, A. Rubio-Abadal, and L. Tarruell, A strontium quantum-gas microscope, PRX Quantum5, 020316 (2024)

work page 2024
[15]

Endres, M

M. Endres, M. Cheneau, T. Fukuhara, C. Weitenberg, P. Schauß, C. Gross, L. Mazza, M. C. Ba˜ nuls, L. Pol- let, I. Bloch, and S. Kuhr, Single-site- and single-atom- resolved measurement of correlation functions, Applied Physics B113, 27 (2013)

work page 2013
[16]

L. Su, A. Douglas, M. Szurek, A. H. H´ ebert, A. Krahn, R. Groth, G. A. Phelps, O. Markovi´ c, and M. Greiner, Fast single atom imaging for optical lattice arrays, Nature Communications16, 1017 (2025)

work page 2025
[17]

A. M. Muzi Falconi, R. Panza, S. Sbernardori, R. Forti, R. Klemt, O. A. Karim, M. Marinelli, and F. Scazza, Microsecond-scale high-survival and number-resolved de- tection of ytterbium atom arrays, Physical Review Let- ters135(2025)

work page 2025
[18]

Jaksch, C

D. Jaksch, C. Bruder, J. I. Cirac, C. W. Gardiner, and P. Zoller, Cold bosonic atoms in optical lattices, Physical Review Letters81, 3108 (1998)

work page 1998
[19]

Greiner, O

M. Greiner, O. Mandel, T. Esslinger, T. W. H¨ ansch, and I. Bloch, Quantum phase transition from a superfluid to a mott insulator in a gas of ultracold atoms, Nature415, 39 (2002)

work page 2002
[20]

W. S. Bakr, A. Peng, M. E. Tai, R. Ma, J. Simon, J. I. Gillen, S. F¨ olling, L. Pollet, and M. Greiner, Probing the superfluid–to–mott insulator transition at the single- atom level, Science329, 547 (2010)

work page 2010
[21]

Tomita, S

T. Tomita, S. Nakajima, I. Danshita, Y. Takasu, and Y. Takahashi, Observation of the mott insulator to su- perfluid crossover of a driven-dissipative bose-hubbard system, Science Advances3, e1701513 (2017)

work page 2017
[22]

W. J. Eckner, T. L. Yelin, A. Cao, A. W. Young, N. D. Oppong, L. Pollet, and A. M. Kaufman, Assembling a bose-hubbard superfluid from tweezer-controlled single atoms (2025), arXiv:2512.24374

work page arXiv 2025
[23]

Gyger, M

F. Gyger, M. Ammenwerth, R. Tao, H. Timme, S. Sni- girev, I. Bloch, and J. Zeiher, Continuous operation of large-scale atom arrays in optical lattices, Physical Re- view Research6, 033104 (2024)

work page 2024
[24]

Endres, H

M. Endres, H. Bernien, A. Keesling, H. Levine, E. R. Anschuetz, A. Krajenbrink, C. Senko, V. Vuletic, M. Greiner, and M. D. Lukin, Atom-by-atom assembly of defect-free one-dimensional cold atom arrays, Science 354, 1024 (2016)

work page 2016
[25]

Gr¨ unzweig, A

T. Gr¨ unzweig, A. Hilliard, M. McGovern, and M. F. An- dersen, Near-deterministic preparation of a single atom in an optical microtrap, Nature Physics6, 951 (2010)

work page 2010
[26]

A. V. Carpentier, Y. H. Fung, P. Sompet, A. J. Hilliard, T. G. Walker, and M. F. Andersen, Preparation of a sin- gle atom in an optical microtrap, Laser Physics Letters 10, 125501 (2013)

work page 2013
[27]

Brown, C

M. Brown, C. Thiele, C. Kiehl, T.-W. Hsu, and C. Regal, Gray-molasses optical-tweezer loading: Controlling colli- sions for scaling atom-array assembly, Physical Review X 9, 011057 (2019)

work page 2019
[28]

Jenkins, J

A. Jenkins, J. W. Lis, A. Senoo, W. F. McGrew, and A. M. Kaufman, Ytterbium nuclear-spin qubits in an op- tical tweezer array, Physical Review X12, 021027 (2022)

work page 2022
[29]

J. Zhu, C. Chen, L. Zhou, X. Xie, C. Jiang, Z. Ding, F. Wu, F. Yang, G. Wang, Q. Gong, P. Zhang, S. Zhang, and P. Peng, High-efficiency loading of 2,400 ytterbium atoms in optical tweezer arrays (2025), arXiv:2512.19795

work page arXiv 2025
[30]

B. J. Lester, N. Luick, A. M. Kaufman, C. M. Reynolds, and C. A. Regal, Rapid production of uniformly-filled arrays of neutral atoms, Physical Review Letters115, 073003 (2015)

work page 2015
[31]

Trisnadi, M

J. Trisnadi, M. Zhang, L. Weiss, and C. Chin, Design and construction of a quantum matter synthesizer, Review of Scientific Instruments93, 083203 (2022)

work page 2022
[32]

See Supplemental Material for experimental details, atom number versus time model, and collision rate calculation, (2026)

work page 2026
[33]

Vuleti´ c, C

V. Vuleti´ c, C. Chin, A. J. Kerman, and S. Chu, Degener- ate raman sideband cooling of trapped cesium atoms at very high atomic densities, Physical Review Letters81, 5768 (1998)

work page 1998
[34]

A. J. Kerman, V. Vuleti´ c, C. Chin, and S. Chu, Beyond optical molasses: 3d raman sideband cooling of atomic cesium to high phase-space density, Physical Review Let- ters84, 439 (2000)

work page 2000
[35]

D.-J. Han, S. Wolf, S. Oliver, C. McCormick, M. T. DePue, and D. S. Weiss, 3d raman sideband cooling of cesium atoms at high density, Physical Review Letters 85, 724 (2000)

work page 2000
[36]

E. H. Qiu, T. ˇSumarac, P. Niu, S. Tsesses, F. Wassaf, D. C. Spierings, M.-W. Chen, M. T. Uysal, A. Bartlett, A. J. Menssen, M. D. Lukin, and V. Vuleti´ c, Loading and imaging atom arrays via electromagnetically induced transparency (2025), arXiv:2509.12124

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025
[37]

Khaykovich, N

L. Khaykovich, N. Friedman, and N. Davidson, Satura- tion of the weak probe amplification in a strongly driven cold and dense atomic cloud, The European Physical Journal D7, 467 (1999)

work page 1999
[38]

Castin, J

Y. Castin, J. I. Cirac, and M. Lewenstein, Reabsorption of light by trapped atoms, Physical Review Letters80, 5305 (1998)

work page 1998
[39]

A. T. Gisbert, N. Piovella, and R. Bachelard, Stochastic heating and self-induced cooling in optically bound pairs of atoms, Physical Review A99, 013619 (2019)

work page 2019
[40]

Y. H. Fung and M. F. Andersen, Efficient collisional blockade loading of a single atom into a tight microtrap, New Journal of Physics17, 073011 (2015)

work page 2015
[41]

Schlosser, G

N. Schlosser, G. Reymond, and P. Grangier, Collisional blockade in microscopic optical dipole traps, Physical Re- view Letters89, 023005 (2002)

work page 2002
[42]

F¨ orster, W

L. F¨ orster, W. Alt, I. Dotsenko, M. Khudaverdyan, D. Meschede, Y. Miroshnychenko, S. Reick, and A. Rauschenbeutel, Number-triggered loading and colli- sional redistribution of neutral atoms in a standing wave dipole trap, New Journal of Physics8, 259 (2006)

work page 2006
[43]

Burnett, P

K. Burnett, P. S. Julienne, and K.-A. Suominen, Laser- driven collisions between atoms in a bose-einstein con- densed gas, Physical Review Letters77, 1416 (1996)

work page 1996
[44]

Vuleti´ c, C

V. Vuleti´ c, C. Chin, A. J. Kerman, and S. Chu, Suppres- sion of atomic radiative collisions by tuning the ground state scattering length, Physical Review Letters83, 943 (1999)

work page 1999
[45]

M. J. Piotrowicz, M. Lichtman, K. Maller, G. Li, S. Zhang, L. Isenhower, and M. Saffman, Two- dimensional lattice of blue-detuned atom traps using a 7 projected gaussian beam array two-dimensional lattice of blue-detuned atom traps using a projected gaussian beam array, Physical Review A88(2013)

work page 2013
[46]

N. R. Hutzler, L. R. Liu, Y. Yu, and K.-K. Ni, Eliminat- ing light shifts for single atom trapping, New Journal of Physics19, 023007 (2017)

work page 2017
[47]

Jooya, N

K. Jooya, N. Musterer, K. W. Madison, and J. L. Booth, Photon-scattering-rate measurement of atoms, Physical Review A88, 063401 (2013). SUPPLEMENT TO ACHIEVING HIGH FILLING OF AN OPTICAL LA TTICE BY LIGHT-ASSISTED REDISTRIBUTION OF A TOMS I. EXPERIMENT AL SETUP AND HARDW ARE The Quantum Matter Synthesizer apparatus consists of two chambers: a stainless st...

work page 2013

[1] [1]

In the weak- field regimeγ LAC ≪Γ, where Γ is the Cs excited state linewidth, scattering atoms are excited to the molecular potential once and stay for 1/Γ = 30ns

with the theoretical model [42, 43]. In the weak- field regimeγ LAC ≪Γ, where Γ is the Cs excited state linewidth, scattering atoms are excited to the molecular potential once and stay for 1/Γ = 30ns. The excited state lifetime is much shorter than the time needed for atoms 10 20 30 40 Distance from center r (lattice sites) 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 Filling Fra...

work page 2026

[2] [2]

Singh, S

K. Singh, S. Anand, A. Pocklington, J. T. Kemp, and H. Bernien, Dual-element, two-dimensional atom array with continuous-mode operation, Physical Review X12, 011040 (2022)

work page 2022

[3] [3]

Barnes, P

K. Barnes, P. Battaglino, B. J. Bloom, K. Cassella, R. Coxe, N. Crisosto, J. P. King, S. S. Kondov, S. Kotru, S. C. Larsen, J. Lauigan, B. J. Lester, M. McDonald, E. Megidish, S. Narayanaswami, C. Nishiguchi, R. Noter- mans, L. S. Peng, A. Ryou, T.-Y. Wu, and M. Yarwood, Assembly and coherent control of a register of nuclear spin qubits, Nature Communicat...

work page 2022

[4] [4]

Pichard, E

G. Pichard, E. Lim, J. Bloch, J. Vaneecloo, L. Boura- chot, G.-J. Both, G. M´ eriaux, S. Dutartre, R. Hostein, J. Paris, B. Ximenez, A. Signoles, A. Browaeys, T. La- haye, and D. Dreon, Rearrangement of individual atoms in a 2000-site optical-tweezer array at cryogenic temper- atures, Physical Review Applied22, 024073 (2024)

work page 2000

[5] [5]

Barredo, S

D. Barredo, S. de L´ es´ eleuc, V. Lienhard, T. Lahaye, and A. Browaeys, An atom-by-atom assembler of defect-free arbitrary two-dimensional atomic arrays, Science354, 1021 (2016)

work page 2016

[6] [6]

H. J. Manetsch, G. Nomura, E. Bataille, K. H. Leung, X. Lv, and M. Endres, A tweezer array with 6100 highly coherent atomic qubits, Nature647, 60 (2025)

work page 2025

[7] [7]

Bluvstein, S

D. Bluvstein, S. J. Evered, A. A. Geim, S. H. Li, H. Zhou, T. Manovitz, S. Ebadi, M. Cain, M. Kali- nowski, D. Hangleiter, J. P. Bonilla Ataides, N. Maskara, I. Cong, X. Gao, P. Sales Rodriguez, T. Karolyshyn, G. Semeghini, M. J. Gullans, M. Greiner, V. Vuleti´ c, and M. D. Lukin, Logical quantum processor based on reconfigurable atom arrays, Nature626, 58 (2024)

work page 2024

[8] [8]

J. F. Sherson, C. Weitenberg, M. Endres, M. Cheneau, I. Bloch, and S. Kuhr, Single-atom-resolved fluorescence imaging of an atomic mott insulator, Nature467, 68 (2010)

work page 2010

[9] [9]

M. F. Parsons, F. Huber, A. Mazurenko, C. S. Chiu, W. Setiawan, K. Wooley-Brown, S. Blatt, and M. Greiner, Site-resolved imaging of fermionic 6Li in an optical lattice, Physical Review Letters114, 213002 (2015)

work page 2015

[10] [10]

S. K. Pampel, M. Marinelli, M. O. Brown, J. P. D’Incao, and C. A. Regal, Quantifying light-assisted collisions in optical tweezers across the hyperfine spectrum, Physical Review Letters134, 013202 (2025)

work page 2025

[11] [11]

Fuhrmanek, R

A. Fuhrmanek, R. Bourgain, Y. R. P. Sortais, and A. Browaeys, Study of light-assisted collisions between a few cold atoms in a microscopic dipole trap, Physical Review A85, 062708 (2012). 6

work page 2012

[12] [12]

M. T. DePue, C. McCormick, S. L. Winoto, S. Oliver, and D. S. Weiss, Unity occupation of sites in a 3d optical lattice, Physical Review Letters82, 2262 (1999)

work page 1999

[13] [13]

W. S. Bakr, J. I. Gillen, A. Peng, S. F¨ olling, and M. Greiner, A quantum gas microscope for detecting sin- gle atoms in a hubbard-regime optical lattice, Nature 462, 74 (2009)

work page 2009

[14] [14]

S. Buob, J. H¨ oschele, V. Makhalov, A. Rubio-Abadal, and L. Tarruell, A strontium quantum-gas microscope, PRX Quantum5, 020316 (2024)

work page 2024

[15] [15]

Endres, M

M. Endres, M. Cheneau, T. Fukuhara, C. Weitenberg, P. Schauß, C. Gross, L. Mazza, M. C. Ba˜ nuls, L. Pol- let, I. Bloch, and S. Kuhr, Single-site- and single-atom- resolved measurement of correlation functions, Applied Physics B113, 27 (2013)

work page 2013

[16] [16]

L. Su, A. Douglas, M. Szurek, A. H. H´ ebert, A. Krahn, R. Groth, G. A. Phelps, O. Markovi´ c, and M. Greiner, Fast single atom imaging for optical lattice arrays, Nature Communications16, 1017 (2025)

work page 2025

[17] [17]

A. M. Muzi Falconi, R. Panza, S. Sbernardori, R. Forti, R. Klemt, O. A. Karim, M. Marinelli, and F. Scazza, Microsecond-scale high-survival and number-resolved de- tection of ytterbium atom arrays, Physical Review Let- ters135(2025)

work page 2025

[18] [18]

Jaksch, C

D. Jaksch, C. Bruder, J. I. Cirac, C. W. Gardiner, and P. Zoller, Cold bosonic atoms in optical lattices, Physical Review Letters81, 3108 (1998)

work page 1998

[19] [19]

Greiner, O

M. Greiner, O. Mandel, T. Esslinger, T. W. H¨ ansch, and I. Bloch, Quantum phase transition from a superfluid to a mott insulator in a gas of ultracold atoms, Nature415, 39 (2002)

work page 2002

[20] [20]

W. S. Bakr, A. Peng, M. E. Tai, R. Ma, J. Simon, J. I. Gillen, S. F¨ olling, L. Pollet, and M. Greiner, Probing the superfluid–to–mott insulator transition at the single- atom level, Science329, 547 (2010)

work page 2010

[21] [21]

Tomita, S

T. Tomita, S. Nakajima, I. Danshita, Y. Takasu, and Y. Takahashi, Observation of the mott insulator to su- perfluid crossover of a driven-dissipative bose-hubbard system, Science Advances3, e1701513 (2017)

work page 2017

[22] [22]

W. J. Eckner, T. L. Yelin, A. Cao, A. W. Young, N. D. Oppong, L. Pollet, and A. M. Kaufman, Assembling a bose-hubbard superfluid from tweezer-controlled single atoms (2025), arXiv:2512.24374

work page arXiv 2025

[23] [23]

Gyger, M

F. Gyger, M. Ammenwerth, R. Tao, H. Timme, S. Sni- girev, I. Bloch, and J. Zeiher, Continuous operation of large-scale atom arrays in optical lattices, Physical Re- view Research6, 033104 (2024)

work page 2024

[24] [24]

Endres, H

M. Endres, H. Bernien, A. Keesling, H. Levine, E. R. Anschuetz, A. Krajenbrink, C. Senko, V. Vuletic, M. Greiner, and M. D. Lukin, Atom-by-atom assembly of defect-free one-dimensional cold atom arrays, Science 354, 1024 (2016)

work page 2016

[25] [25]

Gr¨ unzweig, A

T. Gr¨ unzweig, A. Hilliard, M. McGovern, and M. F. An- dersen, Near-deterministic preparation of a single atom in an optical microtrap, Nature Physics6, 951 (2010)

work page 2010

[26] [26]

A. V. Carpentier, Y. H. Fung, P. Sompet, A. J. Hilliard, T. G. Walker, and M. F. Andersen, Preparation of a sin- gle atom in an optical microtrap, Laser Physics Letters 10, 125501 (2013)

work page 2013

[27] [27]

Brown, C

M. Brown, C. Thiele, C. Kiehl, T.-W. Hsu, and C. Regal, Gray-molasses optical-tweezer loading: Controlling colli- sions for scaling atom-array assembly, Physical Review X 9, 011057 (2019)

work page 2019

[28] [28]

Jenkins, J

A. Jenkins, J. W. Lis, A. Senoo, W. F. McGrew, and A. M. Kaufman, Ytterbium nuclear-spin qubits in an op- tical tweezer array, Physical Review X12, 021027 (2022)

work page 2022

[29] [29]

J. Zhu, C. Chen, L. Zhou, X. Xie, C. Jiang, Z. Ding, F. Wu, F. Yang, G. Wang, Q. Gong, P. Zhang, S. Zhang, and P. Peng, High-efficiency loading of 2,400 ytterbium atoms in optical tweezer arrays (2025), arXiv:2512.19795

work page arXiv 2025

[30] [30]

B. J. Lester, N. Luick, A. M. Kaufman, C. M. Reynolds, and C. A. Regal, Rapid production of uniformly-filled arrays of neutral atoms, Physical Review Letters115, 073003 (2015)

work page 2015

[31] [31]

Trisnadi, M

J. Trisnadi, M. Zhang, L. Weiss, and C. Chin, Design and construction of a quantum matter synthesizer, Review of Scientific Instruments93, 083203 (2022)

work page 2022

[32] [32]

See Supplemental Material for experimental details, atom number versus time model, and collision rate calculation, (2026)

work page 2026

[33] [33]

Vuleti´ c, C

V. Vuleti´ c, C. Chin, A. J. Kerman, and S. Chu, Degener- ate raman sideband cooling of trapped cesium atoms at very high atomic densities, Physical Review Letters81, 5768 (1998)

work page 1998

[34] [34]

A. J. Kerman, V. Vuleti´ c, C. Chin, and S. Chu, Beyond optical molasses: 3d raman sideband cooling of atomic cesium to high phase-space density, Physical Review Let- ters84, 439 (2000)

work page 2000

[35] [35]

D.-J. Han, S. Wolf, S. Oliver, C. McCormick, M. T. DePue, and D. S. Weiss, 3d raman sideband cooling of cesium atoms at high density, Physical Review Letters 85, 724 (2000)

work page 2000

[36] [36]

E. H. Qiu, T. ˇSumarac, P. Niu, S. Tsesses, F. Wassaf, D. C. Spierings, M.-W. Chen, M. T. Uysal, A. Bartlett, A. J. Menssen, M. D. Lukin, and V. Vuleti´ c, Loading and imaging atom arrays via electromagnetically induced transparency (2025), arXiv:2509.12124

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

[37] [37]

Khaykovich, N

L. Khaykovich, N. Friedman, and N. Davidson, Satura- tion of the weak probe amplification in a strongly driven cold and dense atomic cloud, The European Physical Journal D7, 467 (1999)

work page 1999

[38] [38]

Castin, J

Y. Castin, J. I. Cirac, and M. Lewenstein, Reabsorption of light by trapped atoms, Physical Review Letters80, 5305 (1998)

work page 1998

[39] [39]

A. T. Gisbert, N. Piovella, and R. Bachelard, Stochastic heating and self-induced cooling in optically bound pairs of atoms, Physical Review A99, 013619 (2019)

work page 2019

[40] [40]

Y. H. Fung and M. F. Andersen, Efficient collisional blockade loading of a single atom into a tight microtrap, New Journal of Physics17, 073011 (2015)

work page 2015

[41] [41]

Schlosser, G

N. Schlosser, G. Reymond, and P. Grangier, Collisional blockade in microscopic optical dipole traps, Physical Re- view Letters89, 023005 (2002)

work page 2002

[42] [42]

F¨ orster, W

L. F¨ orster, W. Alt, I. Dotsenko, M. Khudaverdyan, D. Meschede, Y. Miroshnychenko, S. Reick, and A. Rauschenbeutel, Number-triggered loading and colli- sional redistribution of neutral atoms in a standing wave dipole trap, New Journal of Physics8, 259 (2006)

work page 2006

[43] [43]

Burnett, P

K. Burnett, P. S. Julienne, and K.-A. Suominen, Laser- driven collisions between atoms in a bose-einstein con- densed gas, Physical Review Letters77, 1416 (1996)

work page 1996

[44] [44]

Vuleti´ c, C

V. Vuleti´ c, C. Chin, A. J. Kerman, and S. Chu, Suppres- sion of atomic radiative collisions by tuning the ground state scattering length, Physical Review Letters83, 943 (1999)

work page 1999

[45] [45]

M. J. Piotrowicz, M. Lichtman, K. Maller, G. Li, S. Zhang, L. Isenhower, and M. Saffman, Two- dimensional lattice of blue-detuned atom traps using a 7 projected gaussian beam array two-dimensional lattice of blue-detuned atom traps using a projected gaussian beam array, Physical Review A88(2013)

work page 2013

[46] [46]

N. R. Hutzler, L. R. Liu, Y. Yu, and K.-K. Ni, Eliminat- ing light shifts for single atom trapping, New Journal of Physics19, 023007 (2017)

work page 2017

[47] [47]

Jooya, N

K. Jooya, N. Musterer, K. W. Madison, and J. L. Booth, Photon-scattering-rate measurement of atoms, Physical Review A88, 063401 (2013). SUPPLEMENT TO ACHIEVING HIGH FILLING OF AN OPTICAL LA TTICE BY LIGHT-ASSISTED REDISTRIBUTION OF A TOMS I. EXPERIMENT AL SETUP AND HARDW ARE The Quantum Matter Synthesizer apparatus consists of two chambers: a stainless st...

work page 2013