Symmetry Classification of Magnetic Orders using Oriented Spin Space Groups

Jes\'us Etxebarria; J. Manuel Perez-Mato; Qihang Liu; Xiaobing Chen; Yuntian Liu; Yutong Yu

arxiv: 2506.20739 · v3 · submitted 2025-06-25 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Symmetry Classification of Magnetic Orders using Oriented Spin Space Groups

Yuntian Liu , Xiaobing Chen , Yutong Yu , Jes\'us Etxebarria , J. Manuel Perez-Mato , Qihang Liu This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 07:29 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

keywords magnetic symmetryspin space groupsspin-orbit couplingferromagnetismantiferromagnetismspin-orbit magnetismmagnetic orders

0 comments

The pith

Oriented spin space groups unify magnetic order classification and reveal spin-orbit magnetism.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes a unified classification of magnetic orders by extending spin space group theory with a fixed magnetic orientation. This distinguishes ferromagnetism, where net spin magnetization is allowed by symmetry, from antiferromagnetism where it is constrained to zero. The approach traces how spin-orbit coupling breaks symmetries to induce magnetization and identifies spin-orbit magnetism as a distinct phase. A sympathetic reader would care because the framework supplies a complete symmetry logic that explains unconventional magnets and supports design of spintronic and quantum materials.

Core claim

By introducing an oriented SSG description, that is an SSG with a fixed magnetic orientation, the authors unify the SSG and magnetic space group frameworks. This clearly reveals the symmetry-breaking pathway induced by spin-orbit coupling and identifies a distinct magnetic phase, termed spin-orbit magnetism, in which the net spin magnetization is induced by spin-orbit coupling.

What carries the argument

oriented spin space group, an SSG with a fixed magnetic orientation, which unifies SSG and MSG frameworks to capture SOC-induced symmetry breaking.

Load-bearing premise

Extending spin space groups with a fixed magnetic orientation produces a complete unification with magnetic space groups that captures all symmetry-breaking pathways induced by spin-orbit coupling without missing cases or requiring extra rules.

What would settle it

A magnetic material whose measured symmetries and net spin magnetization after accounting for spin-orbit coupling fail to match the oriented SSG classification or the predicted breaking pathways.

read the original abstract

Magnetism has witnessed remarkable progress in recent decades, largely driven by its potential for next-generation storage devices. However, the classification of magnetic orders, even for fundamental concepts such as ferromagnetism and antiferromagnetism, remains a topic of active evolution, particularly with the discovery of unconventional magnetic materials and advances in antiferromagnetic spintronics. Here, we present a unified classification of magnetic order utilizing the state-of-the-art spin space group (SSG) theory. Based on whether the net spin magnetization is constrained to zero by SSG, we systematically categorize magnetic orders into ferromagnetism (including ferrimagnetism) and antiferromagnetism. We further introduce an oriented SSG description, i.e., an SSG with a fixed magnetic orientation, thereby unifying the SSG and magnetic space group frameworks. This approach clearly reveals the symmetry-breaking pathway induced by spin-orbit coupling. The proposed group framework completes the intrinsic logic of magnetic symmetry and identifies a distinct magnetic phase, termed spin-orbit magnetism, in which the net spin magnetization is induced by spin-orbit coupling. Our work provides a comprehensive symmetry-based perspective for classifying magnetic order, offering fresh insights into unconventional magnets and broad applicability in spintronics and quantum material design.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper unifies SSG and MSG via oriented spin space groups with fixed orientation and flags spin-orbit magnetism as a distinct SOC-induced phase, but the completeness of that unification still needs concrete checks.

read the letter

The main thing to know is that this work adds an oriented SSG (one with fixed magnetic direction) to link spin space groups to magnetic space groups and uses that to define spin-orbit magnetism as the case where SOC itself produces net magnetization in systems that standard SSG would call antiferromagnetic. They split orders by whether SSG forces zero net spin magnetization, which cleanly separates ferromagnetism/ferrimagnetism from antiferromagnetism and then shows the symmetry-breaking route under SOC. That unification step and the named phase are the actual new pieces relative to the cited SSG and MSG literature. The classification logic is straightforward and gives a compact way to think about unconventional magnets, which is useful for people working on antiferromagnetic spintronics or symmetry-guided material searches. The abstract presents the steps without obvious internal contradictions, and the framework stays within established group theory rather than introducing free parameters or fitted quantities. The soft spot is that the unification claim rests on fixing orientation alone being enough to recover all MSG operations and selection rules. Without the full group tables or explicit checks on non-collinear or frustrated cases in the text, it is not yet clear whether every SOC pathway is covered or if some configurations still need extra rules. If those checks hold up, the central argument is fine; if not, the completeness part weakens. This paper is for condensed-matter researchers who already use symmetry classifications for magnetic materials and want a single language that handles both SSG and MSG cases. Readers focused on spintronic device design or quantum material screening would get the most direct value from the categorization scheme. It is worth sending to a serious referee so experts can verify the derivations and test the framework on known materials rather than desk-rejecting it outright.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a unified classification of magnetic orders based on spin space group (SSG) theory. Magnetic orders are categorized into ferromagnetism (including ferrimagnetism) and antiferromagnetism according to whether the SSG constrains the net spin magnetization to zero. The authors introduce an 'oriented SSG' by fixing the magnetic orientation, which unifies the SSG framework with magnetic space groups (MSG). This reveals the symmetry-breaking pathways induced by spin-orbit coupling (SOC) and identifies a new magnetic phase termed 'spin-orbit magnetism,' where net spin magnetization is induced by SOC. The work aims to complete the intrinsic logic of magnetic symmetry classification.

Significance. Should the unification be rigorously established without gaps, this classification would provide a valuable symmetry perspective for understanding unconventional magnetic materials and their potential in spintronics. It builds on existing SSG theory with a systematic approach to magnetization constraints and offers insights into how SOC can lead to net magnetization in antiferromagnetic-like systems. The identification of spin-orbit magnetism as a distinct phase could stimulate further research in quantum materials if supported by concrete examples.

major comments (2)

[Oriented SSG unification (likely §3 or §4)] The central claim that introducing an oriented SSG with fixed magnetic orientation unifies SSG and MSG frameworks without loss of generality and captures all SOC-induced symmetry-breaking pathways is not substantiated by explicit mappings, group tables, or checks for non-collinear configurations. This assumption is load-bearing for the identification of spin-orbit magnetism and the completion of magnetic symmetry logic.
[Spin-orbit magnetism phase (likely §5)] The definition and distinction of 'spin-orbit magnetism' as a phase where net magnetization is induced by SOC lacks specific derivations or material examples to demonstrate that it is not already covered by existing MSG classifications or requires no additional ad hoc rules.

minor comments (2)

[Abstract] Consider adding a reference to foundational SSG papers to contextualize the 'state-of-the-art' claim.
[Notation] Ensure consistent use of symbols for SSG elements and orientation fixing throughout the text and figures.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thorough review and valuable comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment in detail below, providing clarifications and indicating revisions to be made in the updated version.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Oriented SSG unification (likely §3 or §4)] The central claim that introducing an oriented SSG with fixed magnetic orientation unifies SSG and MSG frameworks without loss of generality and captures all SOC-induced symmetry-breaking pathways is not substantiated by explicit mappings, group tables, or checks for non-collinear configurations. This assumption is load-bearing for the identification of spin-orbit magnetism and the completion of magnetic symmetry logic.

Authors: We appreciate the referee pointing out the need for more explicit substantiation. In our framework, the oriented SSG is constructed by selecting a specific magnetic orientation, which breaks the continuous spin rotation symmetry and aligns the SSG with the discrete symmetries of the MSG. This unification holds without loss of generality because any magnetic configuration can be oriented accordingly, and the SOC-induced pathways are captured by the reduction from SSG to oriented SSG. To strengthen this, we will include explicit mappings in a supplementary table showing how oriented SSGs correspond to MSGs for representative collinear and non-collinear magnetic orders, along with group order comparisons. revision: yes
Referee: [Spin-orbit magnetism phase (likely §5)] The definition and distinction of 'spin-orbit magnetism' as a phase where net magnetization is induced by SOC lacks specific derivations or material examples to demonstrate that it is not already covered by existing MSG classifications or requires no additional ad hoc rules.

Authors: We agree that additional derivations and examples would enhance clarity. Spin-orbit magnetism is defined within the SSG framework as systems where the SSG constrains net magnetization to zero, but the inclusion of SOC breaks additional symmetries allowing a net magnetization to emerge. This is not ad hoc but follows directly from the symmetry reduction. It differs from standard MSG because MSGs assume the magnetic point group from the start, whereas here the induction by SOC is highlighted as a distinct pathway. In the revision, we will add a detailed derivation of the symmetry breaking and provide a concrete material example, such as a known weak ferromagnet arising from SOC in an antiferromagnetic host, to illustrate the phase. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; framework extends established SSG theory via explicit new construction

full rationale

The paper introduces an oriented SSG variant to unify SSG and MSG frameworks and define spin-orbit magnetism based on whether net magnetization is constrained to zero. This is a definitional extension and symmetry-based categorization rather than a reduction to prior inputs by construction. No fitted parameters, self-referential definitions, or load-bearing self-citations appear in the provided abstract or claims. The derivation chain relies on standard group-theoretic distinctions and is self-contained as a classification proposal without circular reduction to its own outputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 1 invented entities

The classification rests on standard group theory axioms for space groups and the domain assumption that net spin magnetization is the primary order parameter for distinguishing ferro- from antiferromagnetism. The new entity spin-orbit magnetism is introduced to label cases where SOC generates magnetization, but lacks independent falsifiable predictions in the abstract.

axioms (2)

domain assumption Spin space groups provide a complete description of magnetic symmetries including spin degrees of freedom.
Invoked in the abstract as the basis for categorizing orders by net magnetization constraint.
ad hoc to paper Fixing magnetic orientation in SSG unifies it with magnetic space group frameworks without loss of generality.
Central to the oriented SSG proposal and symmetry-breaking pathway analysis.

invented entities (1)

spin-orbit magnetism no independent evidence
purpose: To classify the distinct phase where net spin magnetization arises specifically from spin-orbit coupling.
Introduced as a new category completing the magnetic symmetry logic; no independent evidence such as a predicted observable outside the framework is given in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5769 in / 1595 out tokens · 40132 ms · 2026-05-19T07:29:40.572621+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/RealityFromDistinction.lean reality_from_one_distinction unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

We present a unified classification of magnetic order utilizing the state-of-the-art spin space group (SSG) theory... introduce an oriented SSG description... identifies a distinct magnetic phase, termed spin-orbit magnetism
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/AbsoluteFloorClosure.lean absolute_floor_iff_bare_distinguishability unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

The SOC tensor χ represents the symmetry breaking of SSG induced by SOC and can be regarded as the order parameter

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

51 extracted references · 51 canonical work pages

[1]

Jungwirth, X

T. Jungwirth, X. Marti, P. Wadley, and J. Wunderlich, Antiferromagnetic spintronics, Nat. Nanotechnol. 11, 231 (2016)

work page 2016
[2]

Baltz, A

V . Baltz, A. Manchon, M. Tsoi, T. Moriyama, T. Ono, and Y . Tserkovnyak, Antiferromagnetic spintronics, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 015005 (2018)

work page 2018
[3]

Jungwirth, J

T. Jungwirth, J. Sinova, A. Manchon, X. Marti, J. Wunderlich, and C. Felser, The multiple directions of antiferromagnetic spintronics, Nat. Phys. 14, 200 (2018)

work page 2018
[4]

Šmejkal, Y

L. Šmejkal, Y . Mokrousov, B. H. Yan, and A. H. MacDonald, Topological antiferromagnetic spintronics, Nat. Phys. 14, 242 (2018)

work page 2018
[5]

Šmejkal, A

L. Šmejkal, A. H. MacDonald, J. Sinova, S. Nakatsuji, and T. Jungwirth, Anomalous Hall antiferromagnets, Nat. Rev. Mater. 7, 482 (2022)

work page 2022
[6]

J. Han, R. Cheng, L. Liu, H. Ohno, and S. Fukami, Coherent antiferromagnetic spintronics, Nat. Mater. 22, 684 (2023)

work page 2023
[7]

W. C. Koehler, Magnetic Properties of Rare-Earth Metals and Alloys, J Appl. Phys. 36, 1078 (1965)

work page 1965
[8]

W. C. Koehler, J. W. Cable, M. K. Wilkinson, and E. O. Wollan, Magnetic Structures of Holmium. I. Virgin State, Phys. Rev. 151, 414 (1966)

work page 1966
[9]

Šmejkal, J

L. Šmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Beyond Conventional Ferromagnetism and Antiferromagnetism: A Phase with Nonrelativistic Spin and Crystal Rotation Symmetry, Phys. Rev. X 12, 031042 (2022)

work page 2022
[10]

Mazin, Altermagnetism-A New Punch Line of Fundamental Magnetism, Phys

I. Mazin, Altermagnetism-A New Punch Line of Fundamental Magnetism, Phys. Rev. X 12, 040002 (2022)

work page 2022
[11]

S. W. Cheong, and F. T. Huang, Kinetomagnetism of chirality and its applications, Appl. Phys. Lett. 125, 060501 (2024)

work page 2024
[12]

Q. Liu, X. Dai, and S. Blügel, Different facets of unconventional magnetism, Nat. Phys. 21, 329 (2025)

work page 2025
[13]

Néel, Propriétés magnétiques des ferrites ; ferrimagnétisme et antiferromagnétisme, Ann

L. Néel, Propriétés magnétiques des ferrites ; ferrimagnétisme et antiferromagnétisme, Ann. Phys. (Paris, Fr.) 3, 137 (1948)

work page 1948
[14]

Finley, and L

J. Finley, and L. Liu, Spintronics with compensated ferrimagnets, Appl. Phys. Lett. 116, 110501 (2020)

work page 2020
[15]

S. K. Kim, G. S. D. Beach, K. J. Lee, T. Ono, T. Rasing, and H. Yang, Ferrimagnetic spintronics, Nat. Mater. 21, 24 (2022)

work page 2022
[16]

Shubnikov, Symmetry and Antisymmetry of Finite Figures (USSR Press, Moscow, 1951)

A. Shubnikov, Symmetry and Antisymmetry of Finite Figures (USSR Press, Moscow, 1951)

work page 1951
[17]

Zamorzaev, Generalization of Fedorov groups (Candidate dissertation, Leningrad State University, 1953)

A. Zamorzaev, Generalization of Fedorov groups (Candidate dissertation, Leningrad State University, 1953). 17

work page 1953
[18]

D. B. Litvin, and W. Opechowski, Spin Groups, Physica 76, 538 (1974)

work page 1974
[19]

P. Liu, J. Li, J. Han, X. Wan, and Q. Liu, Spin-Group Symmetry in Magnetic Materials with Negligible Spin-Orbit Coupling, Phys. Rev. X 12, 021016 (2022)

work page 2022
[20]

X. Chen, J. Ren, Y . Zhu, Y . Yu, A. Zhang, P. Liu, J. Li, Y . Liu, C. Li, and Q. Liu, Enumeration and representation theory of spin space groups, Phys. Rev. X 14, 031038 (2024)

work page 2024
[21]

Z. Xiao, J. Zhao, Y . Li, R. Shindou, and Z.-D. Song, Spin Space Groups: Full Classification and Applications, Phys. Rev. X 14, 031037 (2024)

work page 2024
[22]

Jiang, Z

Y . Jiang, Z. Song, T. Zhu, Z. Fang, H. Weng, Z.-X. Liu, J. Yang, and C. Fang, Enumeration of spin-space groups: Towards a complete description of symmetries of magnetic orders, Phys. Rev. X 14, 031039 (2024)

work page 2024
[23]

S. M. Shapiro, E. Gurewitz, R. D. Parks, and L. C. Kupferberg, Multiple-Q Magnetic-Structure in CeAl2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 43, 1748 (1979)

work page 1979
[24]

W. Feng, J. P. Hanke, X. Zhou, G. Y . Guo, S. Blügel, Y . Mokrousov, and Y . Yao, Topological magneto-optical effects and their quantization in noncoplanar antiferromagnets, Nat. Commun. 11, 118 (2020)

work page 2020
[25]

Takagi, R

H. Takagi, R. Takagi, S. Minami, T. Nomoto, K. Ohishi, M. T. Suzuki, Y . Yanagi, M. Hirayama, N. D. Khanh, K. Karube et al., Spontaneous topological Hall effect induced by non-coplanar antiferromagnetic order in intercalated van der Waals materials, Nat. Phys. 19, 961 (2023)

work page 2023
[26]

S. V . Gallego, J. M. Perez-Mato, L. Elcoro, E. S. Tasci, R. M. Hanson, K. Momma, M. I. Aroyo, and G. Madariaga, MAGNDATA: towards a database of magnetic structures. I. The commensurate case, J. Appl. Crystallogr. 49, 1750 (2016)

work page 2016
[27]

S. V . Gallego, J. M. Perez-Mato, L. Elcoro, E. S. Tasci, R. M. Hanson, M. I. Aroyo, and G. Madariaga, MAGNDATA: towards a database of magnetic structures. II. The incommensurate case, J. Appl. Crystallogr. 49, 1941 (2016)

work page 1941
[28]

Etxebarria, J

J. Etxebarria, J. M. Perez-Mato, E. S. Tasci, and L. Elcoro, Crystal tensor properties of magnetic materials with and without spin-orbit coupling. Application of spin point groups as approximate symmetries., arXiv:2502.03934v1 (2025)

work page arXiv 2025
[29]

Zhang, M

D. Zhang, M. Shi, T. Zhu, D. Xing, H. Zhang, and J. Wang, Topological Axion States in the Magnetic Insulator MnBi2Te4 with the Quantized Magnetoelectric Effect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 206401 (2019)

work page 2019
[30]

J. Q. Yan, Q. Zhang, T. Heitmann, Z. Huang, K. Y . Chen, J. G. Cheng, W. Wu, D. Vaknin, B. C. Sales, and R. J. McQueeney, Crystal growth and magnetic structure of MnBi2Te4, Phys. Rev. Mater. 3, 064202 (2019)

work page 2019
[31]

S. X. M. Riberolles, T. V . Trevisan, B. Kuthanazhi, T. W. Heitmann, F. Ye, D. C. Johnston, S. L. Bud'ko, D. H. Ryan, P. C. Canfield, A. Kreyssig et al., Magnetic crystalline-symmetry-protected axion electrodynamics and field-tunable unpinned Dirac cones in EuIn2As2, Nat. Commun. 12, 999 (2021)

work page 2021
[32]

J. Li, Q. Yao, L. Wu, Z. Hu, B. Gao, X. Wan, and Q. Liu, Designing light-element materials with large effective spin-orbit coupling, Nat. Commun. 13, 919 (2022)

work page 2022
[33]

Watanabe, K

H. Watanabe, K. Shinohara, T. Nomoto, A. Togo, and R. Arita, Symmetry analysis with spin crystallographic groups: Disentangling effects free of spin-orbit coupling in emergent electromagnetism, Phys. Rev. B 109, 094438 (2024). 18

work page 2024
[34]

X. Chen, Y . Liu, P. Liu, Y . Yu, J. Ren, J. Li, A. Zhang, and Q. Liu, Unconventional magnons in collinear magnets dictated by spin space groups, Nature xx, xxxx (2025)

work page 2025
[35]

H. Chen, Q. Niu, and A. H. MacDonald, Anomalous Hall Effect Arising from Noncollinear Antiferromagnetism, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 017205 (2014)

work page 2014
[36]

Nakatsuji, N

S. Nakatsuji, N. Kiyohara, and T. Higo, Large anomalous Hall effect in a non- collinear antiferromagnet at room temperature, Nature 527, 212 (2015)

work page 2015
[37]

Šmejkal, R

L. Šmejkal, R. González-Hernández, T. Jungwirth, and J. Sinova, Crystal time- reversal symmetry breaking and spontaneous Hall effect in collinear antiferromagnets, Sci. Adv. 6, eaaz8809 (2020)

work page 2020
[38]

R. D. G. Betancourt, J. Zubác, R. Gonzalez-Hernandez, K. Geishendorf, Z. Sobán, G. Springholz, K. Olejnik, L. Smejkal, J. Sinova, T. Jungwirth et al., Spontaneous Anomalous Hall Effect Arising from an Unconventional Compensated Magnetic Phase in a Semiconductor, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 036702 (2023)

work page 2023
[39]

W. Feng, G. Y . Guo, J. Zhou, Y . Yao, and Q. Niu, Large magneto-optical Kerr effect in noncollinear antiferromagnets Mn3X (X = Rh, Ir, Pt), Phys. Rev. B 92, 144426 (2015)

work page 2015
[40]

T. Higo, H. Man, D. B. Gopman, L. Wu, T. Koretsune, O. M. J. van 't Erve, Y . P. Kabanov, D. Rees, Y . Li, M. T. Suzuki et al., Large magneto-optical Kerr effect and imaging of magnetic octupole domains in an antiferromagnetic metal, Nat. Photonics 12, 73 (2018)

work page 2018
[41]

Dzyaloshinsky, A thermodynamic theory of “weak” ferromagnetism of antiferromagnetics, J

I. Dzyaloshinsky, A thermodynamic theory of “weak” ferromagnetism of antiferromagnetics, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 4, 241 (1958)

work page 1958
[42]

Moriya, Anisotropic Superexchange Interaction and Weak Ferromagnetism, Phys

T. Moriya, Anisotropic Superexchange Interaction and Weak Ferromagnetism, Phys. Rev. 120, 91 (1960)

work page 1960
[43]

G. F. Herrmann, Magnetic Resonances and Susceptibility in Orthoferrites, Phys. Rev. 133, A1334 (1964)

work page 1964
[44]

P. L. Richards, Antiferromagnetic Resonance in CoF2, NiF2, and MnCo3, J Appl. Phys. 35, 850 (1964)

work page 1964
[45]

See https://findspingroup.com for the online program FINDSPINGROUP

work page
[46]

Z. Liu, M. Wei, D. Hou, Y . Gao, and Q. Niu, Multipolar Anisotropy in Anomalous Hall Effect from Spin-Group Symmetry Breaking, arXiv:2408.08810v1 (2024)

work page arXiv 2024
[47]

Kresse, and J

G. Kresse, and J. Furthmuller, Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total- energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set, Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169 (1996)

work page 1996
[48]

Kresse, and D

G. Kresse, and D. Joubert, From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method, Phys. Rev. B 59, 1758 (1999)

work page 1999
[49]

J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Generalized gradient approximation made simple, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996)

work page 1996
[50]

J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Generalized gradient approximation made simple (vol 77, pg 3865, 1996), Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 1396 (1997)

work page 1996
[51]

H. J. Monkhorst, and J. D. Pack, Special Points for Brillouin-Zone Integrations, Phys. Rev. B 13, 5188 (1976). 19 Table Ⅰ. All possible spin-space point groups (𝑃𝑠𝑝𝑖𝑛) classified by group structures and the corresponding FM/AFM dichotomy. International Symbols are used to present the point groups. 𝑃𝑠𝑝𝑖𝑛 Magnetism 𝑛 FM 𝑛𝑚𝑚, 𝑛𝑚, ∞𝑚 FM 𝑛̅, 𝑛/𝑚 AFM 𝑛22, 𝑛2 AF...

work page 1976

[1] [1]

Jungwirth, X

T. Jungwirth, X. Marti, P. Wadley, and J. Wunderlich, Antiferromagnetic spintronics, Nat. Nanotechnol. 11, 231 (2016)

work page 2016

[2] [2]

Baltz, A

V . Baltz, A. Manchon, M. Tsoi, T. Moriyama, T. Ono, and Y . Tserkovnyak, Antiferromagnetic spintronics, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 015005 (2018)

work page 2018

[3] [3]

Jungwirth, J

T. Jungwirth, J. Sinova, A. Manchon, X. Marti, J. Wunderlich, and C. Felser, The multiple directions of antiferromagnetic spintronics, Nat. Phys. 14, 200 (2018)

work page 2018

[4] [4]

Šmejkal, Y

L. Šmejkal, Y . Mokrousov, B. H. Yan, and A. H. MacDonald, Topological antiferromagnetic spintronics, Nat. Phys. 14, 242 (2018)

work page 2018

[5] [5]

Šmejkal, A

L. Šmejkal, A. H. MacDonald, J. Sinova, S. Nakatsuji, and T. Jungwirth, Anomalous Hall antiferromagnets, Nat. Rev. Mater. 7, 482 (2022)

work page 2022

[6] [6]

J. Han, R. Cheng, L. Liu, H. Ohno, and S. Fukami, Coherent antiferromagnetic spintronics, Nat. Mater. 22, 684 (2023)

work page 2023

[7] [7]

W. C. Koehler, Magnetic Properties of Rare-Earth Metals and Alloys, J Appl. Phys. 36, 1078 (1965)

work page 1965

[8] [8]

W. C. Koehler, J. W. Cable, M. K. Wilkinson, and E. O. Wollan, Magnetic Structures of Holmium. I. Virgin State, Phys. Rev. 151, 414 (1966)

work page 1966

[9] [9]

Šmejkal, J

L. Šmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Beyond Conventional Ferromagnetism and Antiferromagnetism: A Phase with Nonrelativistic Spin and Crystal Rotation Symmetry, Phys. Rev. X 12, 031042 (2022)

work page 2022

[10] [10]

Mazin, Altermagnetism-A New Punch Line of Fundamental Magnetism, Phys

I. Mazin, Altermagnetism-A New Punch Line of Fundamental Magnetism, Phys. Rev. X 12, 040002 (2022)

work page 2022

[11] [11]

S. W. Cheong, and F. T. Huang, Kinetomagnetism of chirality and its applications, Appl. Phys. Lett. 125, 060501 (2024)

work page 2024

[12] [12]

Q. Liu, X. Dai, and S. Blügel, Different facets of unconventional magnetism, Nat. Phys. 21, 329 (2025)

work page 2025

[13] [13]

Néel, Propriétés magnétiques des ferrites ; ferrimagnétisme et antiferromagnétisme, Ann

L. Néel, Propriétés magnétiques des ferrites ; ferrimagnétisme et antiferromagnétisme, Ann. Phys. (Paris, Fr.) 3, 137 (1948)

work page 1948

[14] [14]

Finley, and L

J. Finley, and L. Liu, Spintronics with compensated ferrimagnets, Appl. Phys. Lett. 116, 110501 (2020)

work page 2020

[15] [15]

S. K. Kim, G. S. D. Beach, K. J. Lee, T. Ono, T. Rasing, and H. Yang, Ferrimagnetic spintronics, Nat. Mater. 21, 24 (2022)

work page 2022

[16] [16]

Shubnikov, Symmetry and Antisymmetry of Finite Figures (USSR Press, Moscow, 1951)

A. Shubnikov, Symmetry and Antisymmetry of Finite Figures (USSR Press, Moscow, 1951)

work page 1951

[17] [17]

Zamorzaev, Generalization of Fedorov groups (Candidate dissertation, Leningrad State University, 1953)

A. Zamorzaev, Generalization of Fedorov groups (Candidate dissertation, Leningrad State University, 1953). 17

work page 1953

[18] [18]

D. B. Litvin, and W. Opechowski, Spin Groups, Physica 76, 538 (1974)

work page 1974

[19] [19]

P. Liu, J. Li, J. Han, X. Wan, and Q. Liu, Spin-Group Symmetry in Magnetic Materials with Negligible Spin-Orbit Coupling, Phys. Rev. X 12, 021016 (2022)

work page 2022

[20] [20]

X. Chen, J. Ren, Y . Zhu, Y . Yu, A. Zhang, P. Liu, J. Li, Y . Liu, C. Li, and Q. Liu, Enumeration and representation theory of spin space groups, Phys. Rev. X 14, 031038 (2024)

work page 2024

[21] [21]

Z. Xiao, J. Zhao, Y . Li, R. Shindou, and Z.-D. Song, Spin Space Groups: Full Classification and Applications, Phys. Rev. X 14, 031037 (2024)

work page 2024

[22] [22]

Jiang, Z

Y . Jiang, Z. Song, T. Zhu, Z. Fang, H. Weng, Z.-X. Liu, J. Yang, and C. Fang, Enumeration of spin-space groups: Towards a complete description of symmetries of magnetic orders, Phys. Rev. X 14, 031039 (2024)

work page 2024

[23] [23]

S. M. Shapiro, E. Gurewitz, R. D. Parks, and L. C. Kupferberg, Multiple-Q Magnetic-Structure in CeAl2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 43, 1748 (1979)

work page 1979

[24] [24]

W. Feng, J. P. Hanke, X. Zhou, G. Y . Guo, S. Blügel, Y . Mokrousov, and Y . Yao, Topological magneto-optical effects and their quantization in noncoplanar antiferromagnets, Nat. Commun. 11, 118 (2020)

work page 2020

[25] [25]

Takagi, R

H. Takagi, R. Takagi, S. Minami, T. Nomoto, K. Ohishi, M. T. Suzuki, Y . Yanagi, M. Hirayama, N. D. Khanh, K. Karube et al., Spontaneous topological Hall effect induced by non-coplanar antiferromagnetic order in intercalated van der Waals materials, Nat. Phys. 19, 961 (2023)

work page 2023

[26] [26]

S. V . Gallego, J. M. Perez-Mato, L. Elcoro, E. S. Tasci, R. M. Hanson, K. Momma, M. I. Aroyo, and G. Madariaga, MAGNDATA: towards a database of magnetic structures. I. The commensurate case, J. Appl. Crystallogr. 49, 1750 (2016)

work page 2016

[27] [27]

S. V . Gallego, J. M. Perez-Mato, L. Elcoro, E. S. Tasci, R. M. Hanson, M. I. Aroyo, and G. Madariaga, MAGNDATA: towards a database of magnetic structures. II. The incommensurate case, J. Appl. Crystallogr. 49, 1941 (2016)

work page 1941

[28] [28]

Etxebarria, J

J. Etxebarria, J. M. Perez-Mato, E. S. Tasci, and L. Elcoro, Crystal tensor properties of magnetic materials with and without spin-orbit coupling. Application of spin point groups as approximate symmetries., arXiv:2502.03934v1 (2025)

work page arXiv 2025

[29] [29]

Zhang, M

D. Zhang, M. Shi, T. Zhu, D. Xing, H. Zhang, and J. Wang, Topological Axion States in the Magnetic Insulator MnBi2Te4 with the Quantized Magnetoelectric Effect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 206401 (2019)

work page 2019

[30] [30]

J. Q. Yan, Q. Zhang, T. Heitmann, Z. Huang, K. Y . Chen, J. G. Cheng, W. Wu, D. Vaknin, B. C. Sales, and R. J. McQueeney, Crystal growth and magnetic structure of MnBi2Te4, Phys. Rev. Mater. 3, 064202 (2019)

work page 2019

[31] [31]

S. X. M. Riberolles, T. V . Trevisan, B. Kuthanazhi, T. W. Heitmann, F. Ye, D. C. Johnston, S. L. Bud'ko, D. H. Ryan, P. C. Canfield, A. Kreyssig et al., Magnetic crystalline-symmetry-protected axion electrodynamics and field-tunable unpinned Dirac cones in EuIn2As2, Nat. Commun. 12, 999 (2021)

work page 2021

[32] [32]

J. Li, Q. Yao, L. Wu, Z. Hu, B. Gao, X. Wan, and Q. Liu, Designing light-element materials with large effective spin-orbit coupling, Nat. Commun. 13, 919 (2022)

work page 2022

[33] [33]

Watanabe, K

H. Watanabe, K. Shinohara, T. Nomoto, A. Togo, and R. Arita, Symmetry analysis with spin crystallographic groups: Disentangling effects free of spin-orbit coupling in emergent electromagnetism, Phys. Rev. B 109, 094438 (2024). 18

work page 2024

[34] [34]

X. Chen, Y . Liu, P. Liu, Y . Yu, J. Ren, J. Li, A. Zhang, and Q. Liu, Unconventional magnons in collinear magnets dictated by spin space groups, Nature xx, xxxx (2025)

work page 2025

[35] [35]

H. Chen, Q. Niu, and A. H. MacDonald, Anomalous Hall Effect Arising from Noncollinear Antiferromagnetism, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 017205 (2014)

work page 2014

[36] [36]

Nakatsuji, N

S. Nakatsuji, N. Kiyohara, and T. Higo, Large anomalous Hall effect in a non- collinear antiferromagnet at room temperature, Nature 527, 212 (2015)

work page 2015

[37] [37]

Šmejkal, R

L. Šmejkal, R. González-Hernández, T. Jungwirth, and J. Sinova, Crystal time- reversal symmetry breaking and spontaneous Hall effect in collinear antiferromagnets, Sci. Adv. 6, eaaz8809 (2020)

work page 2020

[38] [38]

R. D. G. Betancourt, J. Zubác, R. Gonzalez-Hernandez, K. Geishendorf, Z. Sobán, G. Springholz, K. Olejnik, L. Smejkal, J. Sinova, T. Jungwirth et al., Spontaneous Anomalous Hall Effect Arising from an Unconventional Compensated Magnetic Phase in a Semiconductor, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 036702 (2023)

work page 2023

[39] [39]

W. Feng, G. Y . Guo, J. Zhou, Y . Yao, and Q. Niu, Large magneto-optical Kerr effect in noncollinear antiferromagnets Mn3X (X = Rh, Ir, Pt), Phys. Rev. B 92, 144426 (2015)

work page 2015

[40] [40]

T. Higo, H. Man, D. B. Gopman, L. Wu, T. Koretsune, O. M. J. van 't Erve, Y . P. Kabanov, D. Rees, Y . Li, M. T. Suzuki et al., Large magneto-optical Kerr effect and imaging of magnetic octupole domains in an antiferromagnetic metal, Nat. Photonics 12, 73 (2018)

work page 2018

[41] [41]

Dzyaloshinsky, A thermodynamic theory of “weak” ferromagnetism of antiferromagnetics, J

I. Dzyaloshinsky, A thermodynamic theory of “weak” ferromagnetism of antiferromagnetics, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 4, 241 (1958)

work page 1958

[42] [42]

Moriya, Anisotropic Superexchange Interaction and Weak Ferromagnetism, Phys

T. Moriya, Anisotropic Superexchange Interaction and Weak Ferromagnetism, Phys. Rev. 120, 91 (1960)

work page 1960

[43] [43]

G. F. Herrmann, Magnetic Resonances and Susceptibility in Orthoferrites, Phys. Rev. 133, A1334 (1964)

work page 1964

[44] [44]

P. L. Richards, Antiferromagnetic Resonance in CoF2, NiF2, and MnCo3, J Appl. Phys. 35, 850 (1964)

work page 1964

[45] [45]

See https://findspingroup.com for the online program FINDSPINGROUP

work page

[46] [46]

Z. Liu, M. Wei, D. Hou, Y . Gao, and Q. Niu, Multipolar Anisotropy in Anomalous Hall Effect from Spin-Group Symmetry Breaking, arXiv:2408.08810v1 (2024)

work page arXiv 2024

[47] [47]

Kresse, and J

G. Kresse, and J. Furthmuller, Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total- energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set, Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169 (1996)

work page 1996

[48] [48]

Kresse, and D

G. Kresse, and D. Joubert, From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method, Phys. Rev. B 59, 1758 (1999)

work page 1999

[49] [49]

J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Generalized gradient approximation made simple, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996)

work page 1996

[50] [50]

J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Generalized gradient approximation made simple (vol 77, pg 3865, 1996), Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 1396 (1997)

work page 1996

[51] [51]

H. J. Monkhorst, and J. D. Pack, Special Points for Brillouin-Zone Integrations, Phys. Rev. B 13, 5188 (1976). 19 Table Ⅰ. All possible spin-space point groups (𝑃𝑠𝑝𝑖𝑛) classified by group structures and the corresponding FM/AFM dichotomy. International Symbols are used to present the point groups. 𝑃𝑠𝑝𝑖𝑛 Magnetism 𝑛 FM 𝑛𝑚𝑚, 𝑛𝑚, ∞𝑚 FM 𝑛̅, 𝑛/𝑚 AFM 𝑛22, 𝑛2 AF...

work page 1976