Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 2 cited by

The Rayleigh Criterion: Resolution Limits of Astronomical Periodograms

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that periodogram peaks are resolvable only when separated by at least twice the Rayleigh resolution $R=1/T$, and applies this rule to call into question several published planet and stellar-rotation detections.

desk verdict Sensible caution about periodogram resolution, but the paper overstates the case for C=2, and its own synthetic experiment shows correct peaks at C=1.6. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.20864 v2 pith:HRPBBBHZ submitted 2025-06-25 astro-ph.IM astro-ph.EP

V. Ramirez Delgado , J. S. Caicedo Vivas , S. Dodson-Robinson , C. Haley This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.IMastro-ph.EP
keywords RayleighcriterionperiodogramresolutionLomb-Scargleradialvelocityexoplanetdetectiondifferentialrotationtimeseriesanalysisfrequency
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that the Rayleigh criterion, borrowed from optics, sets a hard resolution limit on astronomical periodograms: two frequencies can be distinguished only when separated by at least twice the Rayleigh resolution $R = 1/T$, where $T$ is the observing baseline. Under this rule the lowest frequency a periodogram can establish is $f_{\min} = 2R$, so no period longer than $T/2$ can be claimed from the data alone. The authors support the rule with synthetic experiments showing that uneven observing cadence can split a single oscillation into two peaks, that oversampling the frequency grid does not improve resolution, and that short baselines place peaks at incorrect frequencies. They then re-examine published datasets and conclude that the long-period planet 55 Cnc d cannot be separated from its star's activity cycle, the 4970-day planet candidate around HD 99492 is indistinguishable from a long-term trend, and most reported differential-rotation pairs in a large Kepler sample fail the resolution test. The work matters because periodogram interpretation drives which planets and stellar signals get reported and which time-domain models are built.

What carries the argument

The central object is the Rayleigh resolution $R = 1/T$, the frequency spacing of the spectral window (the Fejér kernel) produced by a finite, unevenly sampled time series. The paper's criterion $|f_1 - f_2| \geq 2R$, together with its corollaries $f_{\min} = 2R$ and 'oversampling adds no resolution,' is the tool that decides which periodogram peaks count as independent signals. The generalized Lomb-Scargle periodogram and the Bayesian generalized Lomb-Scargle periodogram are the estimators on which the criterion is tested and applied.

What would settle it

Run a simulation of two equal-amplitude sinusoids separated by $1.5R$ over a long baseline with random relative phases, and count how often the generalized Lomb-Scargle periodogram produces two distinct peaks at the correct frequencies. If a large majority of phase realizations resolve them, the paper's $2R$ threshold is too strict; if few do, the threshold is supported.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the Rayleigh criterion should govern periodogram resolution with the conservative constant $C = 2$, so that two signals are resolved only when $|f_1 - f_2| \geq 2R = 2/T$, and that no oscillation can be detected at frequencies below $f_{\min} = 2R$. Oversampling the frequency grid cannot beat this limit. The choice of $C = 2$ is justified by the requirement that the time series contain a repeat of every part of every wave, including the beating between the two sinusoids. The authors then apply this criterion to four published datasets, finding that 55 Cnc d and the activity cycle are separated by only $0.75R$, the HD 99492 planet candidate sits at $0.98R$ from zero frequency, the Barnard's star long-term variability in the 2018 data is better fit by a cubic than a sinusoid, and for two Kepler stars the signals attributed to differential rotation can be modeled by a single quasiperiodic Gaussian process.

Load-bearing premise

The argument for choosing $C = 2$, rather than the smaller values near 1.5 found in earlier experiments, rests on a heuristic about sampling every part of the beat pattern and is not derived from first principles.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Observers should not claim two distinct periodic signals unless their frequencies are separated by at least $2R$, and should not quote a period longer than $T/2$ as a measured oscillation.
  • The published radial velocities of 55 Cnc cannot by themselves establish the period of planet d or distinguish it from the star's magnetic activity cycle; other data types are required.
  • The 4970-day planet candidate around HD 99492 is statistically indistinguishable from a zero-frequency trend in the published radial velocities, so it should be modeled as a trend rather than an orbit.
  • The Barnard's star activity signal in the 2018 dataset is better described by a cubic polynomial than by a sinusoid, so no activity-cycle period should be inferred from those data alone.
  • In the large Kepler rotation sample, 91.7 percent of reported differential-rotation frequency pairs do not meet the $2R$ threshold, and the two re-analyzed stars are adequately fit by a single quasiperiodic Gaussian process.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the true resolution threshold is nearer $1.5R$ than $2R$, as earlier numerical experiments and the paper's own Section 4.3 baseline ($C \approx 1.6$) suggest, the verdicts on 55 Cnc d, HD 99492 c, and the Kepler differential rotators would be over-conservative, and a longer-baseline dataset could legitimately resurrect some of those detections.
  • The phase-dependence seen in the synthetic two-sinusoid experiment implies that resolution is not a fixed property of the time series alone but depends on the relative phases of the signals; a search pipeline could quantify the probability of resolving a given separation over random phases.
  • The paper's criterion implies a practical catalog rule for ongoing planet surveys: any candidate whose reported period exceeds half the observing baseline should be flagged as an unresolved trend until astrometry or additional data confirm it.
  • The Gaussian-process re-analysis suggests a testable extension: applying the same single-quasiperiodic model to a random subset of the 17,081 unresolved differential-rotation candidates would show how often the simpler model wins on out-of-sample light curves.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper argues that the Rayleigh criterion, conventionally stated as |f1 - f2| >= C/T with R = 1/T, should be applied as a resolution check on periodograms of astronomical time series. It sets C = 2, states as Corollary 1 that the lowest observable frequency is f_min = C R, and as Corollary 2 that oversampling the frequency grid does not improve resolution. These corollaries are used to interpret three synthetic experiments (peak splitting from window function, phase-dependent resolving power, and time-baseline effects) and to reassess four published datasets: 55 Cnc, HD 99492, Barnard's Star, and two Kepler differential-rotation targets. The conclusions are that 55 Cnc d is not separable from the activity cycle in RVs, the long-period planet candidate of HD 99492 is not separable from zero frequency, a cubic polynomial is a better detrending model than a sinusoid for Barnard's Star RVs over the stated baseline, and the secondary rotation peaks of KIC 891916 and KIC 1869783 are not resolvable from the primary under the criterion.

Significance. If the criterion with C close to 2 is accepted, the paper supplies a practical and important cautionary framework for periodogram-based detection claims, with immediate relevance to RV planet searches, stellar activity studies, and differential-rotation surveys. The paper's strengths include controlled synthetic experiments, explicit comparison of generalized Lomb-Scargle and Bayesian periodograms, independent GP re-analysis of the Kepler light curves, and a public data release. The central quantitative result, however, is not a sharp derived limit but a heuristic choice of C=2, and the paper's own baseline experiment at C=1.6 already produces correct peak positions; this tension is load-bearing because most archival conclusions are phrased as binary resolvability statements using C=2.

major comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 3, Eq. (7)] The paper asserts that C=2 is 'the appropriate Rayleigh criterion' and justifies it only by the heuristic that the time series must contain a repeat of every part of every wave, including the beating envelope. This is a necessary condition for cleanly separating two sinusoids, not a proof of a sharp resolution threshold, and the paper explicitly promises experimental evidence in Sec. 4. That evidence, however, goes the other way: in Sec. 4.3, at T=80 (C=1.6), P1 and P3 already have all peaks at the correct frequencies. The conclusion drawn there that accurate estimates are 'only guaranteed' for f>2R is therefore not supported by the presented experiments; no trial isolates a failure between C=1.6 and C=2. Because all case-study conclusions in Sec. 5 (55 Cnc d, HD 99492 c, the Reinhold et al. pairs, and the 91.7% census) are stated against the C=2 threshold, the central claim of the paper needs either (a) a derivation of C=2 from a quantitative criterion (e.g., a false-positive/false-negative rate on periodogram peak recovery) or (b) a reframing of C=2 as a conservative, non-sharp convention, with the archival claims softened accordingly.
  2. [Sec. 4.3, Fig. 4] The text states that at N=40 and T=0.8, P3 has a peak centered at f=2.4, even less accurate than at T=30; yet at N=80 and T=1.6, P1 and P3 have all peaks at the correct frequencies. This narrative is qualitative: there is no measure of peak-position error versus T, no repeated noise realizations, and no statistical confidence intervals for the recovered frequencies. Given that the paper's Corollary 1 (f_min = 2R) is used to justify a hard cutoff in all archival sections, the experiment should be quantified (e.g., histogram of recovered frequency errors as a function of C, or the fraction of trials in which both peaks are identified within some tolerance). Without such quantification, the statement that f>2R is the threshold at which accuracy is guaranteed overstates the evidence and is not falsifiable.
  3. [Secs. 5.1, 5.2, 5.4] The applied conclusions are phrased as binary statements: 55 Cnc d and the activity cycle 'cannot be distinguished' at |fd - fmag| = 0.75R, the HD 99492 planet candidate 'cannot be statistically separated' at f = 0.98R, and 17,081 of 18,616 differential-rotation pairs 'should not be claimed' because their separation is below 2R. These statements inherit the uncertainty in C. For 0.75R and 0.98R, even the more optimistic cited thresholds (1.44-1.5R) give the same qualitative answer, so those two case studies are robust; however, the differential-rotation census would change substantially if the threshold were near 1.5R instead of 2R, and the paper should either recompute the census for a range of C values or explicitly state that the census is for the conservative C=2 convention. As written, the 91.7% figure and the associated warnings overstate the case.
  4. [Sec. 5.3] The conclusion that a cubic polynomial is a better model than a sinusoid for the Barnard's Star long-term variability rests on a difference in residual standard deviations of 2.597 m/s versus 2.704 m/s. This is a small difference, and the paper does not provide uncertainties on these fits (e.g., via cross-validation, a likelihood-ratio test, or an information criterion). The statement that the cubic is 'superior' should be supported by a quantitative model comparison, especially because the paper elsewhere advises using BIC/AIC and likelihood-ratio tests for model selection.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. 4.1] In the paragraph after Figure 2, 'periododogram' should be 'periodogram'; earlier in the same section 'Rayeligh' should be 'Rayleigh'.
  2. [Sec. 4, last paragraph of 4.2] In the sentence beginning 'On the other hand, harmonic analysis is a frequency domain model-fitting process...' the phrase 'sinsuosid' should be 'sinusoid'.
  3. [Table 2] The row for KIC 1869783 is missing the value of 2R in the final column; the separation 0.0096 is listed, but the reader cannot verify the claim that it is less than 2R without that entry.
  4. [Fig. 12 caption] The caption reads 'GLPS of the original data' but should read 'GLSP'; also, in Sec. 5.4.1 'GLSP' is used consistently elsewhere.
  5. [Appendix A] Equation (A1) uses the abbreviation 'GSLP' while the rest of the paper uses 'GLSP'; please make consistent.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the Rayleigh criterion is an external standard applied to independent synthetic and archival data; the C=2 choice is heuristic but not fitted or self-referential.

full rationale

The paper's central quantity, the Rayleigh resolution R = 1/T, is an externally defined standard (e.g., Godin 1972; Christensen-Dalsgaard & Gough 1982), and the criterion |f1 - f2| >= CR is presented as a stated convention rather than as a quantity fitted to the data being 'predicted.' The synthetic experiments in Section 4 use known input signals and compare periodogram peaks against the chosen threshold; no parameter that defines the target conclusion (e.g., the 2R separation for 55 Cnc d and the activity cycle, or the f < 2R status of HD 99492 c) is estimated from those datasets. The GP and polynomial fits in Section 5 are independent model comparisons with stated likelihoods and residuals. The only self-citations (Dodson-Robinson et al. 2022 for Welch's method; Ramirez Delgado 2023 for data availability) are not load-bearing. The weak point is that C = 2 is justified by a repeat-of-beating heuristic, and Section 4.3 actually finds correct peaks at C = 1.6; this is an evidentiary or consistency concern about the chosen constant, not a circular derivation, because the case-study verdicts do not enter the definition of C.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central threshold rests on a hand-chosen constant C = 2, and the GP reinterpretation relies on fitted kernel parameters. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (3)
  • Rayleigh criterion constant C = 2 (chosen by hand)
    The paper argues for C = 2 because the time series should contain a repeat of the beating pattern, but it does not derive this value. Its own experiment at C = 1.6 already recovers correct peaks, and cited work uses 1.44-1.5. This threshold drives every case-study conclusion.
  • SHO GP parameters for KIC 891916 = mean 16533.77 e-/s, omega0 1.50 rad/day, S0 483.61, Q 2.90, jitter 5.41 e-/s
    Fitted to the Kepler light curve by likelihood maximization and MCMC. Used to claim that a single quasiperiodicity explains the data without differential rotation.
  • SHO GP parameters for KIC 1869783 = mean 15154.55 e-/s, omega0 0.29 rad/day, S0 11105.77, Q 4.94, jitter 12.67 e-/s
    Fitted to the Kepler light curve by likelihood maximization and MCMC. Same role as the KIC 891916 GP model.
assumptions (3)
  • standard math Finite time baseline limits periodogram resolution to the width of the spectral window, and the Fejer kernel's main lobe defines the resolution scale.
    Standard Fourier analysis result that the paper uses without proof in Sections 1 and 3.
  • ad hoc to paper For a periodic signal to be claimed, its frequency must be statistically distinguishable from zero, so f_min = C R.
    This is Corollary 1 in Section 3. It is asserted as a criterion rather than derived from detection statistics, and it conflates resolution from zero with the detectability of a signal.
  • domain assumption A stochastically driven damped simple harmonic oscillator kernel adequately represents quasiperiodic stellar rotation for these two Kepler light curves.
    Section 5.4.2 assumes the celerite2 SHO kernel captures the physical rotation signal. No direct physical validation or formal comparison against the Fourier-series model with BIC/AIC is given.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The Rayleigh Criterion: Resolution Limits of Astronomical Periodograms." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/HRPBBBHZ

@misc{pith2026250620864,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The Rayleigh Criterion: Resolution Limits of Astronomical Periodograms},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/HRPBBBHZ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.20864}
}
read the original abstract

The Rayleigh criterion determines the resolution limit of a periodogram, which is the minimum frequency separation required to barely resolve two sinusoids. Failing to consider the Rayleigh criterion may result in incorrect interpretations of long-period signals or spurious claims that two closely spaced periodogram peaks represent two distinct physical processes. We demonstrate how applying the Rayleigh criterion can help observers avoid false positive detections caused by uneven observing cadence or insufficient observing time baseline. We present three synthetic datasets that illustrate (1) a single oscillation with a split Lomb-Scargle periodogram peak resulting from uneven observing cadence can be mistaken for two oscillations if the Rayleigh criterion is neglected, (2) oversampling a periodogram's frequency grid does not improve resolution, and (3) observing time baseline requirements for resolving two closely spaced oscillations. We use the Rayleigh criterion to revisit detections of planets, stellar activity, and differential rotation from four published datasets. We show that the frequency separation between planet 55~Cnc~d and the activity cycle is too small to distinguish the two phenomena based on published radial velocities (RVs) alone. Likewise, the contested 4970-day planet orbiting HD~99492 cannot be statistically separated from zero frequency. We determine that a cubic polynomial better explains the long-term RV variability of Barnard's star than a sinusoid model. Finally, our re-analysis of {\it Kepler} observations of two active stars shows that the signals previously attributed to differential rotation can be modeled by a Gaussian process with a single quasiperiodicity. This work demonstrates the importance of the Rayleigh criterion when constructing a time-domain model.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.20864 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Top panel: 500 samples of a single sinusoid with additive white noise are generated according to Equation 8 using equal sampling. Bottom panel: 80 samples, includ￾ing the first and last sample, have been selected from the time series above to create a new series with uneven observ￾ing cadence but the same nominal Rayleigh resolution. 4. SYNTHETIC DATASETS In this section we will apply Equation (7) and its two coroll… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Top panel: periodogram of the time series shown in the top panel of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Top panel: Time series computed according to Equation 9 with ϕ = 0 (left). The corresponding GLSP (black) and BGLS periodogram (red) has two resolved peaks at f1 and f2 (right). Center panel: As above, but with ϕ = π/2 (left). The periodogram peaks associated with f1 and f2 are barely resolved (right). Bottom panel: As above, but with ϕ = π (left). The periodograms have a single peak at (f1 + f2)/2 instead of resolv… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (13 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Left column: Time series for our three synthetic signals y1 (dark blue dot), y2 (blue cross), and y3 (down trident). Each panel represents the time series at different values of T, the top one being evaluated at the smallest value and increasing as going down in the co…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Radial velocities of 55 Cnc used in our analysis. The time series contains 1350 data points covering approxi￾mately 25 years. from the S-index, and 11.8 yr from the Hα index. Here we assess whether published RV measurements yield a clear distinction between the periods…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: GLSP of 55 Cnc RVs focused in the low￾frequency range. The vertical lines show frequencies of inter￾est: the long-term activity cycle (orange dash-dotted), planet d (green dashed), and planet f (pink dotted). The horizontal lines indicate the 10%, 5%, and 1% false alar…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Radial velocity measurements of HD 99492 (Meschiari et al. 2011). Top: Original RV measurements. Bottom: Residual RVs after subtracting the published or￾bit of planet b (Marcy et al. 2005). We observe long-term variation that was first thought to be “planet c” but late…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Periodogram of RV measurements from HD 99492, plotted in the low-frequency range. The reported frequency of planet c is highlighted with the dotted vertical line at f = 1/4969.73 day−1 . The frequency of the proposed planet lands inside the gray area of width 2R. appea…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Top: Barnard’s star RV data fitted with a cubic (blue dashed line) and a sinusoid (violet solid line), with values of σr for each respective model. Bottom: GLSP of the RV data (black) and its residuals from the cubic (blue) and sine (violet) fits. The red dotted vertic…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Top: GLSP of KIC 891916’s binned light curve focused on the primary rotation frequency f1 ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Top, upper right inset: Same as the top panel of 10 but for KIC 1869783 Bottom: GLSP of its residuals after iterating the removal of the first four most significant peaks. The most significant peak is now the centered at the reported differential rotation frequency. (…
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Left column: Kepler Q3 light curve of KIC 891916 (top) and KIC 1869783 (bottom) binned into two-hour bins. The blue line represents 100 samples from the posterior distribution of the SHO model fitted to each light curve. Right column: GLPS of the original data and the…
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Left column: Unevenly spaced time series for y1, y2 and y3, with the time baseline T increasing from top to bottom. Middle column: GLSP of each time series in the left column, illustrating the changes of the periodogram as the signal coverage increases. Right column: …
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Left column: Time series y1, y2 and y3 with the time baseline T increasing from top to bottom. Simulated error bars are drawn from the distribution N (0, 0.5). Middle column: GLSP of the time series in the left column, illustrating the changes of the periodogram as th…
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Corner plot showing the posterior distribution for the GP model parameters for the light curve of KIC 891916. The vertical lines in the one dimensional histograms represent the 0.16, 0.5 and 0.84 percentiles [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_15.png]
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_16.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Helical radio jets as probes of magnetised cluster environments: Periodic Faraday Rotation Revealed in the Corkscrew Galaxy by POSSUM

    astro-ph.GA 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.5 of 10

    Periodic RM oscillations matching the Corkscrew jet's lateral deviations reveal a transition from jet/sheath to local-ICM Faraday media along the flow.

  2. High-Pass Filtering and Gaussian Process Regularization: Stellar Activity Characterization Techniques Applied to the 55 Cancri Planetary System

    astro-ph.EP 2025-09 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A curvature-penalized Gaussian process can absorb the long-term radial velocity signal attributed to 55 Cancri d, so the data alone do not prove the planet exists.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

122 extracted references · 23 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address archivePrefix author booktitle chapter doi edition editor eprint howpublished institution journal key month number organization pages publisher school series title misctitle type volume year version url label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION init.state.consts ...

  2. [2]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION format.url url empty "" new.block "" url * "" * if FUNCTION format.eprint eprint empty "" archivePrefix empty "" archivePrefix "arXiv" = new.block " " eprint * " " * new.block " " eprint * " " * if if if FUNCTION format.doi doi empty "" " " doi * " " * if FUNCTION format.pid doi empty eprint empty ur...

  3. [3]

    UZg̈X˯w | ? |ݷN͇T?]ҿwϝ ׷oۯHU ߾y >/էgdw5r

    thebibliography [1] 20pt to REFERENCES 6pt =0pt -12pt 10pt plus 3pt =0pt =0pt =1pt plus 1pt =0pt =0pt -12pt =13pt plus 1pt =20pt =13pt plus 1pt \@M =10000 =-1.0em =0pt =0pt 0pt =0pt =1.0em @enumiv\@empty 10000 10000 `\.\@m \@noitemerr \@latex@warning Empty `thebibliography' environment \@ifnextchar \@reference \@latexerr Missing key on reference command E...

    arXiv 2021

  4. [4]

    Abe, M., & Smith, J. O. 2004, Journal of The Audio Engineering Society

    2004

  5. [5]

    2023, PeerJ Computer Science, 9, e1516

    Abril-Pla, O., Andreani, V., Carroll, C., et al. 2023, PeerJ Computer Science, 9, e1516

    2023

  6. [6]

    Aerts , C., Christensen-Dalsgaard , J., & Kurtz , D. W. 2010, Asteroseismology (Springer Science and Business Media), 10.1007/978-1-4020-5803-5

    doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-5803-5 2010

  7. [7]

    2012, , 548, A58, 10.1051/0004-6361/201219910

    Anglada-Escud \'e , G., & Tuomi , M. 2012, , 548, A58, 10.1051/0004-6361/201219910

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201219910 2012

  8. [8]

    2013, , 556, A126, 10.1051/0004-6361/201321331

    Anglada-Escud \'e , G., Tuomi , M., Gerlach , E., et al. 2013, , 556, A126, 10.1051/0004-6361/201321331

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201321331 2013

Show all 122 references
  1. [9]

    2018, , 474, 2094, 10.1093/mnras/stx2109

    Angus , R., Morton , T., Aigrain , S., Foreman-Mackey , D., & Rajpaul , V. 2018, , 474, 2094, 10.1093/mnras/stx2109

    2018 doi

  2. [10]

    M., Sip o cz , B

    Astropy Collaboration , Price-Whelan , A. M., Sip o cz , B. M., et al. 2018, , 156, 123, 10.3847/1538-3881/aabc4f

    2018 doi

  3. [11]

    L., Donahue , R

    Baliunas , S. L., Donahue , R. A., Soon , W. H., et al. 1995, , 438, 269, 10.1086/175072

    1995 doi

  4. [13]

    2013, , 429, 2052, 10.1093/mnras/sts476

    ---. 2013, , 429, 2052, 10.1093/mnras/sts476

    2013 doi

  5. [14]

    2015, , 446, 1493, 10.1093/mnras/stu2150

    ---. 2015, , 446, 1493, 10.1093/mnras/stu2150

    2015 doi

  6. [15]

    Basu , S., & Antia , H. M. 2008, , 457, 217, 10.1016/j.physrep.2007.12.002

    2008 doi

  7. [16]

    A., Gorshkov , A

    Baturin , V. A., Gorshkov , A. B., & Oreshina , A. V. 2015, Astronomy Reports, 59, 46, 10.1134/S1063772915010023

    2015 doi

  8. [17]

    F., McArthur , B., Chappell , D

    Benedict , G. F., McArthur , B., Chappell , D. W., et al. 1999, , 118, 1086, 10.1086/300975

    1999 doi

  9. [18]

    C., & Scargle , J

    Black , D. C., & Scargle , J. D. 1982, , 263, 854, 10.1086/160555

    1982 doi

  10. [19]

    M., O'Donovan , F

    Blomme , J., Sarro , L. M., O'Donovan , F. T., et al. 2011, , 418, 96, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19466.x

    2011

  11. [20]

    2000, Fourier analysis of time series: an introduction, 2nd ed., Wiley series in probability and statistics

    Bloomfield, P. 2000, Fourier analysis of time series: an introduction, 2nd ed., Wiley series in probability and statistics. Applied probability and statistics section (New York: Wiley)

    2000

  12. [21]

    M., et al

    Blunt , S., Endl , M., Weiss , L. M., et al. 2019, , 158, 181, 10.3847/1538-3881/ab3e63

    2019 doi

  13. [22]

    2011, , 528, A4, 10.1051/0004-6361/201014354

    Boisse , I., Bouchy , F., H \'e brard , G., et al. 2011, , 528, A4, 10.1051/0004-6361/201014354

    2011 doi

  14. [23]

    Bonfils , X., Lo Curto , G., Correia , A. C. M., et al. 2013, , 556, A110, 10.1051/0004-6361/201220237

    2013 doi

  15. [24]

    2018, , 619, A1, 10.1051/0004-6361/201833154

    Bourrier , V., Dumusque , X., Dorn , C., et al. 2018, , 619, A1, 10.1051/0004-6361/201833154

    2018 doi

  16. [25]

    Box , G. E. P., & Draper, N. R. 1987, Empirical model-building and response surfaces (USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.)

    1987

  17. [26]

    2001, in Encyclopedia of Vibration, ed

    Braun, S. 2001, in Encyclopedia of Vibration, ed. S. Braun (Oxford: Elsevier), 1208--1223, https://doi.org/10.1006/rwvb.2001.0187

    2001

  18. [27]

    S., Antia , H

    Brun , A. S., Antia , H. M., Chitre , S. M., & Zahn , J. P. 2002, , 391, 725, 10.1051/0004-6361:20020837

    2002 doi

  19. [28]

    P., Marcy , G

    Butler , R. P., Marcy , G. W., Williams , E., Hauser , H., & Shirts , P. 1997, , 474, L115, 10.1086/310444

    1997 doi

  20. [29]

    P., Vogt , S

    Butler , R. P., Vogt , S. S., Laughlin , G., et al. 2017, , 153, 208, 10.3847/1538-3881/aa66ca

    2017 doi

  21. [30]

    1969, Proceedings of the IEEE, 57, 1408, 10.1109/PROC.1969.7278

    Capon, J. 1969, Proceedings of the IEEE, 57, 1408, 10.1109/PROC.1969.7278

    1969

  22. [31]

    Chaboyer , B., Demarque , P., & Pinsonneault , M. H. 1995, , 441, 865, 10.1086/175408

    1995 doi

  23. [32]

    W., et al

    Choi , J., McCarthy , C., Marcy , G. W., et al. 2013, , 764, 131, 10.1088/0004-637X/764/2/131

    2013 doi

  24. [33]

    Christensen-Dalsgaard , J., & Gough , D. O. 1982, , 198, 141, 10.1093/mnras/198.1.141

    1982 doi

  25. [34]

    R., McLeod , C

    Claverie , A., Isaak , G. R., McLeod , C. P., van der Raay , H. B., & Roca Cortes , T. 1979, , 282, 591, 10.1038/282591a0

    1979 doi

  26. [35]

    P., Marcy , G

    Cumming , A., Butler , R. P., Marcy , G. W., et al. 2008, , 120, 531, 10.1086/588487

    2008 doi

  27. [36]

    I., & Fabrycky , D

    Dawson , R. I., & Fabrycky , D. C. 2010, , 722, 937, 10.1088/0004-637X/722/1/937

    2010 doi

  28. [37]

    B., Hara , N., & S \'e gransan , D

    Delisle , J. B., Hara , N., & S \'e gransan , D. 2020, , 635, A83, 10.1051/0004-6361/201936905

    2020 doi

  29. [38]

    E., Delgado , V

    Dodson-Robinson , S. E., Delgado , V. R., Harrell , J., & Haley , C. L. 2022, , 163, 169, 10.3847/1538-3881/ac52ed

    2022 doi

  30. [39]

    Z., Levesque , E

    Dorn-Wallenstein , T. Z., Levesque , E. M., & Davenport , J. R. A. 2019, , 878, 155, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab223f

    2019 doi

  31. [40]

    C., Udry , S., Lovis , C., & Bonfils , X

    Dumusque , X., Santos , N. C., Udry , S., Lovis , C., & Bonfils , X. 2011, , 527, A82, 10.1051/0004-6361/201015877

    2011 doi

  32. [41]

    D., et al

    Endl , M., Robertson , P., Cochran , W. D., et al. 2012, , 759, 19, 10.1088/0004-637X/759/1/19

    2012 doi

  33. [42]

    P., Su \'a rez Mascare \ n o , A., Figueira , P., et al

    Faria , J. P., Su \'a rez Mascare \ n o , A., Figueira , P., et al. 2022, , 658, A115, 10.1051/0004-6361/202142337

    2022 doi

  34. [43]

    A., Marcy , G

    Fischer , D. A., Marcy , G. W., Butler , R. P., et al. 2008, , 675, 790, 10.1086/525512

    2008 doi

  35. [44]

    2018, Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society, 2, 31, 10.3847/2515-5172/aaaf6c

    Foreman-Mackey , D. 2018, Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society, 2, 31, 10.3847/2515-5172/aaaf6c

    2018 doi

  36. [45]

    2017, , 154, 220, 10.3847/1538-3881/aa9332

    Foreman-Mackey , D., Agol , E., Ambikasaran , S., & Angus , R. 2017, , 154, 220, 10.3847/1538-3881/aa9332

    2017 doi

  37. [46]

    1995, , 109, 1889, 10.1086/117416

    Foster , G. 1995, , 109, 1889, 10.1086/117416

    1995 doi

  38. [47]

    2023, , 672, A149, 10.1051/0004-6361/202245201

    Fuhrmeister , B., Coffaro , M., Stelzer , B., et al. 2023, , 672, A149, 10.1051/0004-6361/202245201

    2023 doi

  39. [48]

    2020, VizieR Online Data Catalog, I/350, 10.26093/cds/vizier.1350

    Gaia Collaboration . 2020, VizieR Online Data Catalog, I/350, 10.26093/cds/vizier.1350

    2020 doi

  40. [49]

    1973, , 78, 769, 10.1086/111480

    Gatewood , G., & Eichhorn , H. 1973, , 78, 769, 10.1086/111480

    1973 doi

  41. [50]

    Gelman, A., & Rubin, D. B. 1992, Statistical science, 7, 457

    1992

  42. [51]

    1972, The Analysis of Tides (University of Toronto Press)

    Godin, G. 1972, The Analysis of Tides (University of Toronto Press)

    1972

  43. [52]

    I., Su \'a rez Mascare \ n o , A., Silva , A

    Gonz \'a lez Hern \'a ndez , J. I., Su \'a rez Mascare \ n o , A., Silva , A. M., et al. 2024, , 690, A79, 10.1051/0004-6361/202451311

    2024 doi

  44. [53]

    Gregory , P. C. 2016, , 458, 2604, 10.1093/mnras/stw147

    2016 doi

  45. [54]

    C., & Fischer , D

    Gregory , P. C., & Fischer , D. A. 2010, , 403, 731, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.16233.x

    2010

  46. [55]

    C., Bou \'e , G., Laskar , J., & Correia , A

    Hara , N. C., Bou \'e , G., Laskar , J., & Correia , A. C. M. 2017, , 464, 1220, 10.1093/mnras/stw2261

    2017 doi

  47. [56]

    Harris, F. J. 1978, Proceedings of the IEEE, 66, 51

    1978

  48. [57]

    P., Endl , M., Cochran , W

    Hatzes , A. P., Endl , M., Cochran , W. D., et al. 2018, , 155, 120, 10.3847/1538-3881/aaa8e1

    2018 doi

  49. [58]

    D., Collier Cameron , A., Queloz , D., et al

    Haywood , R. D., Collier Cameron , A., Queloz , D., et al. 2014, , 443, 2517, 10.1093/mnras/stu1320

    2014 doi

  50. [59]

    H., & Baliunas , S

    Horne , J. H., & Baliunas , S. L. 1986, , 302, 757, 10.1086/164037

    1986 doi

  51. [60]

    S., Yoma , N

    Jenkins , J. S., Yoma , N. B., Rojo , P., Mahu , R., & Wuth , J. 2014, , 441, 2253, 10.1093/mnras/stu683

    2014 doi

  52. [61]

    R., Thirumalachari , B., Henry , G

    Kane , S. R., Thirumalachari , B., Henry , G. W., et al. 2016, , 820, L5, 10.3847/2041-8205/820/1/L5

    2016 doi

  53. [62]

    I., Gulvanskii, V

    Kaplun, D. I., Gulvanskii, V. V., Minenkov, D. V., & Kanatov, I. I. 2023, in 2023 Seminar on Signal Processing, 32--35, 10.1109/IEEECONF60473.2023.10366088

    2023

  54. [63]

    2006, , 371, 1390, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10762.x

    Koen , C. 2006, , 371, 1390, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10762.x

    2006

  55. [64]

    1981, , 78, 175, 10.1007/BF00654032

    Kovacs , G. 1981, , 78, 175, 10.1007/BF00654032

    1981 doi

  56. [65]

    2019, Journal of Open Source Software, 4, 1143, 10.21105/joss.01143

    Kumar, R., Carroll, C., Hartikainen, A., & Martin, O. 2019, Journal of Open Source Software, 4, 1143, 10.21105/joss.01143

    2019 doi

  57. [66]

    2003, , 403, 1077, 10.1051/0004-6361:20030396

    K \"u rster , M., Endl , M., Rouesnel , F., et al. 2003, , 403, 1077, 10.1051/0004-6361:20030396

    2003 doi

  58. [67]

    2012, Numerical ecology (Elsevier)

    Legendre, P., & Legendre, L. 2012, Numerical ecology (Elsevier)

    2012

  59. [68]

    Lightkurve Collaboration , Cardoso , J. V. d. M., Hedges , C., et al. 2018, Lightkurve: Kepler and TESS time series analysis in Python , Astrophysics Source Code Library. 1812.013

    2018

  60. [69]

    Lomb , N. R. 1976, , 39, 447, 10.1007/BF00648343

    1976 doi

  61. [70]

    L \'o pez-Morales , M., Triaud , A. H. M. J., Rodler , F., et al. 2014, , 792, L31, 10.1088/2041-8205/792/2/L31

    2014 doi

  62. [71]

    L., & Deeming , T

    Loumos , G. L., & Deeming , T. J. 1978, , 56, 285, 10.1007/BF01879560

    1978 doi

  63. [72]

    2021, , 162, 61, 10.3847/1538-3881/ac0057

    Lubin , J., Robertson , P., Stefansson , G., et al. 2021, , 162, 61, 10.3847/1538-3881/ac0057

    2021 doi

  64. [73]

    H., Allain, D

    Lyard, F. H., Allain, D. J., Cancet, M., Carrère, L., & Picot, N. 2021, Ocean Science, 17, 615, 10.5194/os-17-615-2021

    2021 doi

  65. [74]

    W., Butler , R

    Marcy , G. W., Butler , R. P., Fischer , D. A., et al. 2002, , 581, 1375, 10.1086/344298

    2002 doi

  66. [75]

    W., Butler , R

    Marcy , G. W., Butler , R. P., Vogt , S. S., et al. 2005, , 619, 570, 10.1086/426384

    2005 doi

  67. [76]

    E., Endl , M., Cochran , W

    McArthur , B. E., Endl , M., Cochran , W. D., et al. 2004, , 614, L81, 10.1086/425561

    2004 doi

  68. [77]

    S., et al

    Meschiari , S., Laughlin , G., Vogt , S. S., et al. 2011, , 727, 117, 10.1088/0004-637X/727/2/117

    2011 doi

  69. [78]

    1999, Delta Scuti Star Newsletter, vol

    Montgomery, M., & O'donoghue, D. 1999, Delta Scuti Star Newsletter, vol. 13, p. 28, 13, 28

    1999

  70. [79]

    2015, arXiv preprint arXiv:1510.03924

    Moritz, S., Sard \'a , A., Bartz-Beielstein, T., Zaefferer, M., & Stork, J. 2015, arXiv preprint arXiv:1510.03924

    2015 arXiv

  71. [80]

    2017, , 601, A110, 10.1051/0004-6361/201630201

    Mortier , A., & Collier Cameron , A. 2017, , 601, A110, 10.1051/0004-6361/201630201

    2017 doi

  72. [81]

    P., Correia , C

    Mortier , A., Faria , J. P., Correia , C. M., Santerne , A., & Santos , N. C. 2015, , 573, A101, 10.1051/0004-6361/201424908

    2015 doi

  73. [82]

    L., et al

    Naef , D., Mayor , M., Beuzit , J. L., et al. 2004, , 414, 351, 10.1051/0004-6361:20034091

    2004 doi

  74. [83]

    1995, Modern spectrum analysis of time series (CRC Press, Boca Raton)

    Naidu, P. 1995, Modern spectrum analysis of time series (CRC Press, Boca Raton)

    1995

  75. [84]

    E., Ford , E

    Nelson , B. E., Ford , E. B., Wright , J. T., et al. 2014, , 441, 442, 10.1093/mnras/stu450

    2014 doi

  76. [85]

    J., Tinney , C

    O'Toole , S. J., Tinney , C. G., Jones , H. R. A., et al. 2009, , 392, 641, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.14051.x

    2009

  77. [86]

    2020, , 905, 67, 10.3847/1538-4357/abc250

    Pan , Y., Fu , J.-N., Zong , W., et al. 2020, , 905, 67, 10.3847/1538-4357/abc250

    2020 doi

  78. [87]

    2021, , 645, A96, 10.1051/0004-6361/202038306

    Pepe , F., Cristiani , S., Rebolo , R., et al. 2021, , 645, A96, 10.1051/0004-6361/202038306

    2021 doi

  79. [88]

    H., Flannery , B

    Press , W. H., Flannery , B. P., Teukolsky , S. A., Vetterling , W. T., & Gould , H. 1987, American Journal of Physics, 55, 90, 10.1119/1.14981

    1987 doi

  80. [89]

    A., Reece , S., & Roberts , S

    Rajpaul , V., Aigrain , S., Osborne , M. A., Reece , S., & Roberts , S. 2015, , 452, 2269, 10.1093/mnras/stv1428

    2015 doi

  81. [90]

    2023, The Rayleigh Criterion: Resolution Limits of Astronomical Periodograms, Zenodo, 10.5281/ZENODO.10039084

    Ramirez Delgado, V. 2023, The Rayleigh Criterion: Resolution Limits of Astronomical Periodograms, Zenodo, 10.5281/ZENODO.10039084

    2023 doi

  82. [91]

    2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2406.05447, 10.48550/arXiv.2406.05447

    Rauer , H., Aerts , C., Cabrera , J., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2406.05447, 10.48550/arXiv.2406.05447

    2024 doi arXiv

  83. [92]

    1879, The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science, 8, 261

    Rayleigh, L. 1879, The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science, 8, 261

  84. [93]

    2015, , 583, A65, 10.1051/0004-6361/201526216

    Reinhold , T., & Gizon , L. 2015, , 583, A65, 10.1051/0004-6361/201526216

    2015 doi

  85. [94]

    2013, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 560, A4, 10.1051/0004-6361/201321970

    Reinhold, T., Reiners, A., & Basri, G. 2013, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 560, A4, 10.1051/0004-6361/201321970

    2013 doi

  86. [95]

    2018, , 563, 365, 10.1038/s41586-018-0677-y

    Ribas , I., Tuomi , M., Reiners , A., et al. 2018, , 563, 365, 10.1038/s41586-018-0677-y

    2018 doi

  87. [96]

    L., S \'e gransan , D., Marmier , M., et al

    Rickman , E. L., S \'e gransan , D., Marmier , M., et al. 2019, , 625, A71, 10.1051/0004-6361/201935356

    2019 doi

  88. [97]

    J., Fulton, B

    Rosenthal, L. J., Fulton, B. J., Hirsch, L. A., et al. 2021, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 255, 8, 10.3847/1538-4365/abe23c

    2021 doi

  89. [98]

    Scargle , J. D. 1982, , 263, 835, 10.1086/160554

    1982 doi

  90. [99]

    1898, Terrestrial Magnetism, 3, 13

    Schuster, A. 1898, Terrestrial Magnetism, 3, 13

  91. [100]

    1991, , 253, 198, 10.1093/mnras/253.2.198

    Schwarzenberg-Czerny , A. 1991, , 253, 198, 10.1093/mnras/253.2.198

    1991 doi

  92. [101]

    H., & Stoffer, D

    Shumway, R. H., & Stoffer, D. S. 2001, Time Series Analysis and Its Applications, 4th edn. (New York: Springer)

    2001

  93. [102]

    Smith, J. O. 2011, Spectral audio signal processing (W3K)

    2011

  94. [103]

    2023, , 678, A90, 10.1051/0004-6361/202346887

    Stalport , M., Cretignier , M., Udry , S., et al. 2023, , 678, A90, 10.1051/0004-6361/202346887

    2023 doi

  95. [104]

    2022, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol

    Stotesbury , I., Edwards , B., Lavigne , J.-F., et al. 2022, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 12180, Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2022: Optical, Infrared, and Millimeter Wave, ed. L. E. Coyle , S. Matsuura , & M. D. P...

    2022 doi

  96. [105]

    R., et al

    Su \'a rez Mascare \ n o , A., Gonz \'a lez- \'A lvarez , E., Zapatero Osorio , M. R., et al. 2023, , 670, A5, 10.1051/0004-6361/202244991

    2023 doi

  97. [106]

    J., Lanzerotti, L

    Thomson, D. J., Lanzerotti, L. J., Vernon, F. L., Lessard, M. R., & Smith, L. T. P. 2007, Proceedings of the IEEE, 95, 1085

    2007

  98. [107]

    E., & Emery, W

    Thomson, R. E., & Emery, W. J. 2014 (Elsevier), 10.1016/C2010-0-66362-0

    2014 doi

  99. [108]

    2018, Experimental Astronomy, 46, 135, 10.1007/s10686-018-9598-x

    Tinetti, G., Drossart, P., Eccleston, P., et al. 2018, Experimental Astronomy, 46, 135, 10.1007/s10686-018-9598-x

    2018 doi

  100. [109]

    Tuomi , M., Jones , H. R. A., Jenkins , J. S., et al. 2013, , 551, A79, 10.1051/0004-6361/201220509

    2013 doi

  101. [110]

    1963, , 68, 515, 10.1086/109001

    van de Kamp , P. 1963, , 68, 515, 10.1086/109001

    1963 doi

  102. [111]

    1969, , 74, 757, 10.1086/110852

    ---. 1969, , 74, 757, 10.1086/110852

    1969 doi

  103. [112]

    1975, , 80, 658, 10.1086/111791

    ---. 1975, , 80, 658, 10.1086/111791

    1975 doi

  104. [113]

    1982, Vistas in Astronomy, 26, 141, 10.1016/0083-6656(82)90004-6

    ---. 1982, Vistas in Astronomy, 26, 141, 10.1016/0083-6656(82)90004-6

    1982 doi

  105. [114]

    A., et al

    Vanderburg , A., Plavchan , P., Johnson , J. A., et al. 2016, , 459, 3565, 10.1093/mnras/stw863

    2016 doi

  106. [115]

    VanderPlas , J. T. 2018, , 236, 16, 10.3847/1538-4365/aab766

    2018 doi

  107. [116]

    2021, Bayesian analysis, 16, 667

    Vehtari, A., Gelman, A., Simpson, D., Carpenter, B., & B \"u rkner, P.-C. 2021, Bayesian analysis, 16, 667

    2021

  108. [117]

    2013, Astronomy and Computing, 1, 5, 10.1016/j.ascom.2012.12.001

    Vio , R., Diaz-Trigo , M., & Andreani , P. 2013, Astronomy and Computing, 1, 5, 10.1016/j.ascom.2012.12.001

    2013 doi

  109. [118]

    1971, Biometrika, 58, 21

    Walker, A. 1971, Biometrika, 58, 21

    1971

  110. [119]

    1967, IEEE Transactions on Audio and Electroacoustics, AU-15, 70

    Welch, P. 1967, IEEE Transactions on Audio and Electroacoustics, AU-15, 70

    1967

  111. [120]

    A., Clark , J

    Wittenmyer , R. A., Clark , J. T., Zhao , J., et al. 2019, , 484, 5859, 10.1093/mnras/stz290

    2019 doi

  112. [121]

    Wright , J. T. 2004, , 128, 1273, 10.1086/423221

    2004 doi

  113. [122]

    F., H \'e brard , E

    Yu , L., Donati , J. F., H \'e brard , E. M., et al. 2017, , 467, 1342, 10.1093/mnras/stx009

    2017 doi

  114. [123]

    2009, , 496, 577, 10.1051/0004-6361:200811296

    Zechmeister , M., & K \"u rster , M. 2009, , 496, 577, 10.1051/0004-6361:200811296

    2009 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.