Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 2 cited by

Selective filtering of multi-photon events from a single-photon emitter

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper shows that the multi-photon errors limiting pulsed single-photon sources can be filtered away, because the errant photon emitted during the driving pulse is spectrally broad while the wanted photon is narrow — a distinction that…

desk verdict A credible demonstration that narrowband filtering suppresses the broad 'instantaneous' photon in short-pulse excitation, with honest limitations; worth a careful referee. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.22378 v1 pith:CCLFEECC submitted 2025-06-27 quant-ph

Friedrich Sbresny , Carolin Calcagno , Sang Kyu Kim , Katarina Boos , William Rauhaus , Frederik Bopp , Hubert Riedl , Jonathan J. Finley
show 2 more authors
Eduardo Zubizarreta Casalengua Kai Müller
This is my paper
classification quant-ph MSC 81V80 PACS 42.50.Ar42.50.Ct78.67.Hc
keywords single-photonpuritymulti-photonerrorssecond-ordercoherenceg(2)(0)spectralfilteringquantumdotbiexcitoncascadeinstantaneousphoton
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Single-photon sources driven by short pulses are limited by a specific error: the emitter occasionally decays during the pulse and re-excites, producing a second photon. This paper establishes that the errant first photon is spectrally broad — its width is set by the pulse duration, not by the emitter's natural linewidth — while the desired photon is narrow. That separation of scales means a narrowband spectral filter can reject most of the multi-photon error while barely attenuating the wanted photon. The authors demonstrate this in a semiconductor quantum dot, where filtering cuts the measured $g^{(2)}(0)$ from $(5.8 \pm 0.4)\times 10^{-4}$ to $(7.5 \pm 2.0)\times 10^{-5}$, almost an order of magnitude.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the instantaneous photon, the photon emitted by premature decay while the driving pulse is still on; its spectral width scales with the inverse pulse duration instead of the natural linewidth, which is what makes it separable. The theoretical machinery is frequency-filtered quantum-optics correlation theory: the master equation is extended with a weakly coupled sensor that acts as a Lorentzian filter of bandwidth $\Gamma$, yielding $g^{(2)}(0;\Gamma)$ as a function of filter width, and the calculations show a plateau for wide filters, a steep descent as $\Gamma$ approaches the emitter's decay rate $\gamma_\sigma$, and a second plateau once the filter is narrower than the emitter linewidth. Experimentally, the machinery is a series of grating-based spectral filters down to 23 GHz plus a 1.4 GHz etalon, applied to the vertically polarized exciton transition of the cascade.

What would settle it

Take a two-level emitter with no phonon sideband and no spectral diffusion — for instance a trapped atom or ion — drive it with $\pi$-pulses shorter than its radiative lifetime, and measure $g^{(2)}(0)$ as a function of filter bandwidth. The predicted curve has a flat plateau for wide filters and a drop of almost one order of magnitude as the filter narrows toward the linewidth; if that descent is absent, the attribution to the instantaneous photon fails. A second check: re-measure the quantum-dot exciton line at 1.4 GHz after eliminating the periodic electric noise, since the paper reports its headline value only as an upper bound affected by blinking.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is the spectro-temporal fingerprint of the 'instantaneous photon': for driving pulses shorter than the emitter lifetime, a photon prematurely emitted during the pulse lasts about as long as the pulse, so its spectrum is broad (many times the natural linewidth), whereas the desired single photon is emitted over the radiative lifetime and is narrow. Because these two photons have different spectra, a frequency filter acts as a multi-photon-error valve: a filter wider than the natural linewidth but much narrower than the pulse-broadened shoulder removes the majority of the instantaneous photon without materially reducing the desired emission. The paper verifies this mechanism in a biexciton-exciton cascade of an InGaAs quantum dot, reporting $g^{(2)}(0) = (7.5 \pm 2.0)\times 10^{-5}$ with a 1.4 GHz etalon filter, and reproduces the measured filter-width dependence of $g^{(2)}(0;\Gamma)$ with a master-equation model.

Load-bearing premise

The causal story assumes that what the narrow filter removes is genuinely the broad instantaneous photon: if the measured purity gain instead comes from rejecting phonon sidebands, spectral diffusion, or the periodic electric-noise blinking the paper itself documents, the central mechanism would have to be revised.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Pulsed single-photon sources can gain roughly an order of magnitude in purity by adding a spectral filter that is broad compared with the emitter linewidth, so the desired photon rate is only weakly affected.
  • For sources that already include filters, pulse duration and filter bandwidth can be co-optimized, since the filter's benefit appears only for pulses shorter than the emitter lifetime.
  • The mechanism implies that emitter, pulse, and detection apparatus must be treated jointly when benchmarking single-photon purity, rather than the emitter alone.
  • For emitters in nanophotonic cavities, the cavity's spectral transmission reshapes the pulse and the emission, so the filtering effect must be characterized anew in that regime, as the paper itself states.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the mechanism is as general as the two-level model suggests, the same filter-based purity gain should transfer to other pulsed single-photon emitters — atoms, molecules, defect centers — wherever the erring photon is emitted during the pulse.
  • The theoretical dip near $\Gamma/\gamma_\sigma \approx 2.5$ in the four-level model implies an optimal filter width exists; beyond it the desired photon is attenuated faster than the instantaneous one, a design rule the paper leaves implicit.
  • Because the paper's headline value is an upper bound limited by electric-noise blinking, eliminating that noise could push $g^{(2)}(0)$ below $7.5\times 10^{-5}$ on the same source with the same filter.
  • A temperature-dependent study on the same quantum dot would separate the instantaneous-photon mechanism from the phonon sideband, since the sideband strength changes with temperature while the pulse-duration broadening does not.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper claims that for excitation pulses shorter than the emitter radiative lifetime, photons emitted prematurely during the pulse (the 'instantaneous photon') are spectrally broader than the natural linewidth, so a narrowband spectral filter can reject a large fraction of these photons and thereby reduce the multi-photon error rate, quantified by g(2)(0). The authors support this with a two-level master-equation model and with an experiment on a biexciton-exciton cascade in an InGaAs quantum dot, where narrowing the spectral filter from ~281 GHz to 1.4 GHz reduces the measured g(2)(0) from about 6.5e-4 to (7.5 ± 2.0)e-5. The theoretical predictions use measured lifetimes and pulse durations and assume Lorentzian filters, while the experimental filters are super-Gaussian. The manuscript acknowledges that quantitative comparison is difficult and that the narrowest measurement is an upper bound due to electric-noise-induced blinking.

Significance. If the causal mechanism is correct, the result is significant and broadly applicable: it provides a simple spectral-filtering strategy to suppress the reexcitation-limited multiphoton error rate without substantially attenuating the desired single-photon emission. The theoretical calculations use standard sensor-method correlators with independently measured lifetimes and pulse durations, so the central trend is not obtained by curve-fitting the data. The experimental raw g(2) values with Poisson errors are reported transparently, and the authors explicitly flag the blinking-limited upper bound. These are strengths. The main weakness is that the experimental attribution of the filter-dependent improvement to the 'instantaneous photon' mechanism is not uniquely established, because the model omits phonon sidebands and no direct spectral characterization of the multiphoton component is provided.

major comments (3)
  1. [Methods, Sec. A.2 (Eq. (7)); Results, paragraph beginning 'For an ideal four-level system...'] The four-level model in Eq. (7) includes only radiative decay via Lindblad terms, with no phonon sideband or pure dephasing. However, the Results section states that the tail of the exciton phonon sideband leaks into the biexciton line, which implies that a significant phonon sideband is present on the exciton transition used for the g(2) measurements. Since a phonon sideband is a broad spectral component of the same transition, the observed filter-width-dependent reduction of g(2)(0) could be partly or wholly caused by rejecting phonon-assisted emission rather than by the 'instantaneous photon' mechanism. The manuscript provides no direct spectral measurement of the multiphoton-error component (e.g., frequency-resolved g(2) or a spectrum of the coincidence events) that would distinguish these possibilities. This is load-bearing for the causal claim in the title and abstract. A phonon-included calculation (for example, an independent-boson-model treatment with the relevant phonon spectral density) or a direct spectral measurement of the error component should be added to support the attribution.
  2. [Results (Fig. 3); Methods, Sec. D] The experimental filters are characterized as super-Gaussian with width-dependent shapes, while the theoretical curves in Fig. 3b assume Lorentzian filters (the sensor bandwidth Gamma in Eqs. (5) and (10)). The manuscript acknowledges that quantitative comparison is difficult, but the claimed validation of the mechanism rests on the qualitative similarity of the trend, including a predicted dip at Gamma/gamma_sigma = 2.5 that is compared to a single 1.4 GHz etalon point. To make the comparison genuinely quantitative, the calculation should be repeated using the measured transmission functions of the actual filters used for each data point. As written, the agreement in trend is suggestive but not a precise test of the model.
  3. [Results (paragraph after Eq. (7)?), Appendix D] The headline value g(2)(0) = (7.5 ± 2.0)e-5 is explicitly an upper bound because of periodic electric-noise blinking, as documented in Appendix D. This caution is appropriate and is a strength, but it also means that the reported 'almost one order of magnitude' improvement is measured from an upper bound. The paper should state clearly in the abstract or conclusions that the true filtered value may be lower and that the improvement factor is therefore a lower bound.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Fig. 1 caption and Results text] The notation for pulse durations is inconsistent: the figure caption uses `0.02\tau_0` while the main text and figure labels use `0.02\tau_\sigma`; please unify.
  2. [Results, paragraph after Fig. 2] The phrase 'the the single-photon purity' contains a typo ('the the'); please correct.
  3. [Appendix B] There is a repeated word in 'which which we attribute to a very low but finite probability'; please fix.
  4. [General notation] The paper uses both `g^{(2)}[0;\Gamma]` and `g^{(2)}(0)` for the same quantity; standardizing to one notation would improve readability.
  5. [Methods, Sec. D] The description of the pulse duration as '5 ps intensity full width at half maximum long pulse' is awkward; consider rephrasing to 'a pulse with 5 ps intensity full width at half maximum'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central filter-suppression claim is supported by a self-contained model plus raw experimental data, not by a fitted or self-cited conclusion.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is that photons emitted during a short driving pulse are spectrally broad, allowing narrowband filtering to suppress multi-photon events. This is derived from a Lindblad master equation for a two-level system (Methods Eq. 3) and a four-level biexciton ladder (Methods Eq. 7), with no free parameters fitted to the measured g(2) values. The theoretical g(2) versus filter-width curves use independently measured lifetimes (tau_2X = 158 ps, tau_XV = 294 ps) and pulse durations (5 ps and 10 ps), and the experimental g(2) values in Fig. 3a are raw data from Hanbury Brown and Twiss measurements. The filter-width scan itself is a parameter sweep, not a fit. The claim that the first emitted photon is spectrally broad follows from the model's time-frequency structure, and the experiment confirms the predicted trend. Self-citations to refs. [26,27] for the reexcitation limit and ref. [40] for the computational sensor method are used as background or numerical tools, not as the load-bearing justification of the new result; the current model independently reproduces the reexcitation mechanism. The authors explicitly acknowledge that quantitative agreement is limited by complex filter shapes and imperfect pulse shapes, which further shows the comparison is not engineered. Correctness concerns about omitted phonon sidebands or spectral diffusion may affect the causal interpretation, but they do not make the derivation circular: the reported g(2) values are measurements and the theoretical curves are genuine predictions from stated assumptions.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The theory uses standard open-quantum-system machinery with no free parameters fitted to the target g(2) curves: the emitter lifetime and pulse durations are measured separately, and the filter bandwidth is scanned. The main axioms are that Lindblad radiative decay without dephasing or phonons captures the correlations, that the sensor and epsilon-to-zero method represents the frequency-filtered correlations, and that the excitation pulse is a transform-limited Gaussian of area pi. No new physical particles, mediators, forces, or dimensions are introduced.

assumptions (4)
  • standard math Lindblad master equation and quantum regression theorem give the correct time-dependent emitter dynamics and two-time correlations.
    Invoked in Methods A, Eqs. (3), (5), (7), and (10); the sensor method and quantum regression are standard open-quantum-system tools, and the paper cites the original formalism in Refs. [34-36].
  • domain assumption The emitter is described by radiative decay at rate gamma_sigma with no pure dephasing and no phonon coupling.
    Methods A, Eq. (7), assumes all transitions share the same decay rate and no phonon or dephasing terms appear. The paper mentions phonon sidebands only as a contaminant of the biexciton line, not as part of the model for the measured exciton transition.
  • domain assumption The experimental spectral filters can be represented by Lorentzian filters of width Gamma for the theoretical predictions.
    The sensor method uses a Lorentzian sensor of bandwidth Gamma (Methods A). The authors state in the Results that quantitative comparison is difficult because the experimental filter shapes are complex and deviate between measurements, so this assumption is only approximate.
  • domain assumption The excitation pulses are coherent, transform-limited Gaussians of area pi, and the dominant two-photon error mechanism is premature decay followed by reexcitation.
    Methods A, Eq. (2), defines the Gaussian driving profile. In the Results, imperfect pulse shapes and preparation fidelity are listed as possible sources of mismatch, and the reexcitation mechanism is borrowed from the authors' prior Refs. [26,27].

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Selective filtering of multi-photon events from a single-photon emitter." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/CCLFEECC

@misc{pith2026250622378,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Selective filtering of multi-photon events from a single-photon emitter},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/CCLFEECC}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.22378}
}
read the original abstract

Single-photon purity is one of the most important key metrics of many quantum states of light. For applications in photonic quantum technologies, e.g. quantum communication and linear optical quantum computing, a minimization of the multi-photon error rate is required because of its error-introducing nature. Ultimately, the purity of state-of-the-art single-photon sources was found to be limited by spontaneous emission and subsequent reexcitation during the interaction with the driving field. Here, we demonstrate that even this fundamental limit to the single-photon purity can be overcome due to the distinct spectro-temporal properties of the individual photons forming multi-photon errors. For driving pulses shorter than the emitter lifetime, we find that photons emitted during the pulse exhibit a significantly broader spectral shape than the emitter's natural linewidth. Thus, we can selectively filter out the majority of this instantaneously emitted photon by employing narrowband spectral filters which reduces the measured degree of second-order coherence at zero time delay by almost one order of magnitude. This enables a significant suppression of the multi-photon error rate without detrimental effects on the desired single-photon emission.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.22378 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. c, where we plot the g (2) [0; Γ] in dependence of the excitation pulse length normalized to the emitter lifetime for three Lorentzian filters with bandwidths of Γ = 0.1γσ (sand), Γ = 1γσ (cyan) and Γ = 20γσ (purple). For ex￾citation pulse durations longer than the radiative decay rate, we observe that the the single-photon purity is in￾dependent on the filter width. On the other hand, for pulse durations shorter th… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_6.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Asymmetric two-photon response of an incoherently driven quantum emitter

    quant-ph 2025-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    In a phonon-assisted pumped quantum dot, the first of two photons emitted under one pulse is red-shifted, yielding the Rabi frequency and enabling spectral suppression of multiphoton noise.

  2. Deterministic Control of Photon-Number Probabilities via Phase-Controlled Quantum Interference

    quant-ph 2025-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    By tuning a pulse area and an interferometer phase, a single-photon emitter's output is reshaped into mixtures with controlled vacuum, one-photon, and two-photon probabilities, demonstrated experimentally and in a dis...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

47 extracted references · 35 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Resonance fluorescence We consider a two-level system, consisting of a ground state |0⟩ and one excitonic state|1⟩, whose energies are 0 and ωX, respectively. Under resonant excitation, with frequency ωL = ωX, the Hamiltonian in the Rotating Frame reads Hrf = ΩX(t)(σ† + σ) , (1) where the transition operator is defined as σ = |0⟩ ⟨1| and the driving ampli...

    work page

  2. [2]

    We shall use an indexi from 1 to 4, which is assigned to each state as it was pre- sented in the previous line

    Biexciton ladder The biexciton ladder consists of four levels: one ground state |cgs⟩, two excitonic states |XH⟩ and |XV⟩ (hori- zontal and vertical excitons, respectively), and the two- exciton bound state |2X⟩. We shall use an indexi from 1 to 4, which is assigned to each state as it was pre- sented in the previous line. We have four allowed tran- sitio...

    work page

  3. [3]

    P. Kok, W. J. Munro, K. Nemoto, T. C. Ralph, J. P. Dowling, and G. J. Milburn, Linear optical quantum computing with photonic qubits, Reviews of Modern Physics 79, 135 (2007)

    2007

  4. [4]

    C. H. Bennett and G. Brassard, Quantum cryptogra- phy: Public key distribution and coin tossing, Theoreti- cal Computer Science560, 7 (2014)

    2014

  5. [5]

    Knill, R

    E. Knill, R. Laflamme, and G. J. Milburn, A scheme for efficient quantum computation with linear optics, Nature 409, 46 (2001)

    2001

  6. [6]

    C. A. Kocher and E. D. Commins, Polarization Correla- tion of Photons Emitted in an Atomic Cascade, Physical Review Letters18, 575 (1967)

    work page 1967

  7. [7]

    Aaronson and A

    S. Aaronson and A. Arkhipov, The computational com- plexity of linear optics, in Proceedings of the Forty- 8 Third Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (ACM, San Jose California USA, 2011) pp. 333–342

    work page 2011

  8. [8]

    Zhong, H

    H.-S. Zhong, H. Wang, Y.-H. Deng, M.-C. Chen, L.-C. Peng, Y.-H. Luo, J. Qin, D. Wu, X. Ding, Y. Hu, P. Hu, X.-Y. Yang, W.-J. Zhang, H. Li, Y. Li, X. Jiang, L. Gan, G. Yang, L. You, Z. Wang, L. Li, N.-L. Liu, C.-Y. Lu, and J.-W. Pan, Quantum computational advantage using photons, Science370, 1460 (2020)

    2020

Show all 47 references
  1. [9]

    Schwartz, D

    I. Schwartz, D. Cogan, E. R. Schmidgall, Y. Don, L. Gantz, O. Kenneth, N. H. Lindner, and D. Gershoni, Deterministic generation of a cluster state of entangled photons, Science354, 434 (2016)

    2016

  2. [10]

    R. M. Stevenson, R. J. Young, P. Atkinson, K. Cooper, D. A. Ritchie, and A. J. Shields, A semiconductor source of triggered entangled photon pairs, Nature 439, 179 (2006)

    2006

  3. [11]

    N. H. Lindner and T. Rudolph, Proposal for pulsed On- demandsourcesofphotonicclusterstatestrings,Physical Review Letters103, 1 (2009)

    2009

  4. [12]

    H.-J.Briegel, W.Dür, J.I.Cirac,andP.Zoller,Quantum Repeaters: The Role of Imperfect Local Operations in Quantum Communication, Physical Review Letters81, 5932 (1998)

    1998

  5. [13]

    J. P. Lee, B. Villa, A. J. Bennett, R. M. Stevenson, D. J. P. Ellis, I. Farrer, D. A. Ritchie, and A. J. Shields, A quantum dot as a source of time-bin entangled multi-photon states, Quantum Science and Technology4, 025011 (2019)

    2019

  6. [14]

    Thomas, L

    P. Thomas, L. Ruscio, O. Morin, and G. Rempe, Efficient generation of entangled multiphoton graph states from a single atom, Nature608, 677 (2022)

    2022

  7. [15]

    Raussendorf, D

    R. Raussendorf, D. E. Browne, and H. J. Briegel, Measurement-based quantum computation on cluster states, Physical Review A68, 022312 (2003)

    2003

  8. [16]

    Azuma, K

    K. Azuma, K. Tamaki, and H.-K. Lo, All-photonic quan- tum repeaters, Nature Communications6, 6787 (2015)

    2015

  9. [17]

    Azuma, S

    K. Azuma, S. E. Economou, D. Elkouss, P. Hilaire, L. Jiang, H.-K. Lo, and I. Tzitrin, Quantum repeaters: From quantum networks to the quantum internet, Re- views of Modern Physics95, 045006 (2023)

    2023

  10. [18]

    Somaschi, V

    N. Somaschi, V. Giesz, L. De Santis, J. C. Loredo, M. P. Almeida, G. Hornecker, S. L. Portalupi, T. Grange, C. Antón, J. Demory, C. Gómez, I. Sagnes, N. D. Lanzillotti-Kimura, A. Lemaítre, A. Auffeves, A. G. White, L. Lanco, and P. Senellart, Near-optimal single- photon source...

    2016

  11. [19]

    Van Den Nest, Measurement-based quantum compu- tation, Nature Physics5, 19 (2009)

    H.J.Briegel, D.E.Browne, W.Dür, R.Raussendorf,and M. Van Den Nest, Measurement-based quantum compu- tation, Nature Physics5, 19 (2009)

    2009

  12. [20]

    D. B. Higginbottom, L. Slodička, G. Araneda, L. Lach- man, R. Filip, M. Hennrich, and R. Blatt, Pure single photons from a trapped atom source, New Journal of Physics 18, 093038 (2016)

    2016

  13. [21]

    R. Uppu, F. T. Pedersen, Y. Wang, C. T. Olesen, C. Pa- pon, X. Zhou, L. Midolo, S. Scholz, A. D. Wieck, A. Lud- wig, and P. Lodahl, Scalable integrated single-photon source, Science Advances6, eabc8268 (2020)

    2020

  14. [22]

    Senellart, G

    P. Senellart, G. Solomon, and A. White, High- performance semiconductor quantum-dot single-photon sources, Nature Nanotechnology12, 1026 (2017)

    2017

  15. [23]

    Trivedi, K

    R. Trivedi, K. A. Fischer, J. Vučković, and K. Müller, Generation of Non-Classical Light Using Semiconduc- tor Quantum Dots, Advanced Quantum Technologies3, 1900007 (2020)

    2020

  16. [24]

    Rickert, K

    L. Rickert, K. Żołnacz, D. A. Vajner, M. Von Hel- versen, S. Rodt, S. Reitzenstein, H. Liu, S. Li, H. Ni, P. Wyborski, G. Sęk, A. Musiał, Z. Niu, and T. Heindel, A fiber-pigtailed quantum dot device generating indis- tinguishable photons at GHz clock-rates, Nanophotonics 14, 1...

    2025

  17. [25]

    N. Tomm, A. Javadi, N. O. Antoniadis, D. Najer, M. C. Löbl, A. R. Korsch, R. Schott, S. R. Valentin, A. D. Wieck, A. Ludwig, and R. J. Warburton, A bright and fast source of coherent single photons, Nature Nanotech- nology 16, 399 (2021)

    2021

  18. [26]

    M. B. Rota, T. M. Krieger, Q. Buchinger, M. Beccaceci, J. Neuwirth, H. Huet, N. Horová, G. Lovicu, G. Ronco, S. F. Covre Da Silva, G. Pettinari, M. Moczała- Dusanowska, C. Kohlberger, S. Manna, S. Stroj, J. Fre- und, X. Yuan, C. Schneider, M. Ježek, S. Höfling, F. Basso Basset...

    2024

  19. [27]

    Hanschke, K

    L. Hanschke, K. A. Fischer, S. Appel, D. Lukin, J. Wierzbowski, S. Sun, R. Trivedi, J. Vučković, J. J. Fin- ley, and K. Müller, Quantum dot single-photon sources with ultra-low multi-photon probability, npj Quantum Information 4, 43 (2018)

    2018

  20. [28]

    Ding, Y.-P

    X. Ding, Y.-P. Guo, M.-C. Xu, R.-Z. Liu, G.-Y. Zou, J.-Y. Zhao, Z.-X. Ge, Q.-H. Zhang, H.-L. Liu, L.-J. Wang, M.-C. Chen, H. Wang, Y.-M. He, Y.-H. Huo, C.-Y. Lu, and J.-W. Pan, High-efficiency single-photon source above the loss-tolerant threshold for efficient lin- ear optica...

    2025

  21. [29]

    K. A. Fischer, L. Hanschke, M. Kremser, J. J. Finley, K. Müller, and J. Vučković, Pulsed Rabi oscillations in quantum two-level systems: Beyond the area theorem, Quantum Science and Technology3, 014006 (2018)

    2018

  22. [30]

    Brunner, G

    K. Brunner, G. Abstreiter, G. Böhm, G. Tränkle, and G. Weimann, Sharp-Line Photoluminescence and Two- Photon Absorption of Zero-Dimensional Biexcitons in a GaAs/AlGaAs Structure, Physical Review Letters 73, 1138 (1994)

    1994

  23. [31]

    E. M. González-Ruiz, J. Bjerlin, O. A. D. Sandberg, and A. S. Sørensen, Two-photon correlations and Hong-Ou- Mandel visibility from an imperfect single-photon source, Physical Review Applied23, 054063 (2025)

    2025

  24. [32]

    Schweickert, K

    L. Schweickert, K. D. Jöns, K. D. Zeuner, S. F. Covre da Silva, H. Huang, T. Lettner, M. Reindl, J. Zichi, R. Trotta, A. Rastelli, and V. Zwiller, On-demand gener- ation of background-free single photons from a solid-state source, Applied Physics Letters112, 093106 (2018)

    2018

  25. [33]

    Tignon, C

    I.Favero, G.Cassabois, R.Ferreira, D.Darson, C.Voisin, J. Tignon, C. Delalande, G. Bastard, Ph. Roussignol, and J. M. Gérard, Acoustic phonon sidebands in the emission line of single InAs/GaAs quantum dots, Physical Review B 68, 233301 (2003)

    2003

  26. [34]

    Stufler, P

    S. Stufler, P. Machnikowski, P. Ester, M. Bichler, V. M. Axt, T. Kuhn, and A. Zrenner, Two-photon Rabi oscilla- tions in a single In x Ga 1 - x As / Ga As quantum dot, Physical Review B73, 125304 (2006)

    2006

  27. [35]

    Bayer, G

    M. Bayer, G. Ortner, O. Stern, A. Kuther, A. A. Gor- bunov, A. Forchel, P. Hawrylak, S. Fafard, K. Hinzer, T. L. Reinecke, S. N. Walck, J. P. Reithmaier, F. Klopf, and F. Schäfer, Fine structure of neutral and charged excitons in self-assembled In(Ga)As/(Al)GaAs quantum dots, ...

    2002

  28. [36]

    J. C. López Carreño, E. Del Valle, and F. P. Laussy, Frequency-resolved Monte Carlo, Scientific Reports 8, 6975 (2018)

    2018

  29. [37]

    del Valle, A

    E. del Valle, A. Gonzalez-Tudela, F. P. Laussy, C. Teje- dor, and M. J. Hartmann, Theory of Frequency-Filtered and Time-Resolved N-Photon Correlations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 183601 (2012)

    2012

  30. [38]

    Both pulse shapers consist ofaplaneruleddiffractiongratingwith1800grooves/mm and a lens with 300 mm focal length

    in a serial configuration. Both pulse shapers consist ofaplaneruleddiffractiongratingwith1800grooves/mm and a lens with 300 mm focal length. In the Fourier plane of the pulse shapers an adjustable mechanical slit mounted on a translation stage and a mirror are posi- tioned. Th...

  31. [39]

    C. W. Gardiner and M. J. Collett, Input and output in damped quantum systems: Quantum stochastic differen- tial equations and the master equation, Phys. Rev. A31, 3761 (1985)

    1985

  32. [40]

    M. C. Löbl, I. Söllner, A. Javadi, T. Pregnolato, R. Schott, L. Midolo, A. V. Kuhlmann, S. Stobbe, A. D. Wieck, P. Lodahl, A. Ludwig, and R. J. Warburton, Narrow optical linewidths and spin pumping on charge- tunable close-to-surface self-assembled quantum dots in an ultrathin...

    2017

  33. [41]

    A. M. Weiner, J. P. Heritage, and E. M. Kirschner, High- resolution femtosecond pulse shaping, Journal of the Op- tical Society of America B5, 1563 (1988)

    1988

  34. [42]

    Decker, Beam distributions beyond RMS, inAIP Conference Proceedings, Vol

    F.-J. Decker, Beam distributions beyond RMS, inAIP Conference Proceedings, Vol. 333 (AIP, Vancouver, British Columbia (Canada), 1995) pp. 550–556

    1995

  35. [43]

    Bermúdez-Feijóo, E

    S. Bermúdez-Feijóo, E. Zubizarreta Casalengua, K. Müller, and K. D. Jöns, Spectral correla- tions of dynamical Resonance Fluorescence (2025), arXiv:2504.05242

    2025 arXiv

  36. [44]

    P. A. Dalgarno, J. M. Smith, B. D. Gerardot, A. O. Gov- orov, K.Karrai, P.M.Petroff,andR.J.Warburton,Dark exciton decay dynamics of a semiconductor quantum dot, physica status solidi (a)202, 2591 (2005)

    2005

  37. [45]

    R. J. Warburton, C. Schäflein, D. Haft, F. Bickel, A. Lorke, K. Karrai, J. M. Garcia, W. Schoenfeld, and P. M. Petroff, Optical emission from a charge-tunable quantum ring, Nature405, 926 (2000). 10 Appendix A: Details of the theoretical model

    2000

  38. [46]

    Time-integrated photon correlations We are particularly interested in the time-integrated two-photon correlations g(2)[0; Γ] = R T 0 R T 0 G(2) Γ (t1, t2) dt1dt2 ( R T 0 nΓ(t) dt)2 , (A1) where T, the integration time, is taken to infinity (T → ∞). The frequency-filtered popul...

  39. [47]

    Biexciton ladder polarization As explained in the Methods section, the biexciton ladder is coupled to the two linear polarizations, that is, X = σ21 + σ42 couples to theH polarization, whereas Y = σ31 + σ43 couples to theV polarization. The input laser field can have any arbit...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.