Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Heavy-tailed open quantum systems reveal long-lived and ultrasensitive coherence

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper argues that extremely heavy-tailed system-environment couplings can make open quantum systems simultaneously long-lived and ultrasensitive, breaking the usual stability-sensitivity tradeoff.

desk verdict A plausible and well-executed numerical study of heavy-tailed random Lindbladians; the main missing piece is finite-size scaling for the gapless claim. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.22717 v1 pith:Q47ZHVX6 submitted 2025-06-28 quant-ph math-phmath.MP

Sunkyu Yu , Xianji Piao , Namkyoo Park This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-phmath-phmath.MP
keywords heavy-taileddistributionsopenquantumsystemsLindbladmasterequationLiouvillianspectralgapcoherencesensingPetermannfactorcentrallimittheorem
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to show that the usual way of modeling randomness in open quantum systems—drawing system-environment couplings from Gaussian distributions, as the central limit theorem would suggest—misses a regime with qualitatively different behavior. Replacing those couplings with heavy-tailed Student's t distributions that have infinite variance makes the Liouvillian's spectrum nearly gapless, so most quantum states decay slowly while a few outlier states absorb most of the dissipation. The paper argues that, as a result, quantum coherence can be simultaneously long-lived and highly sensitive to perturbations, with both the coherence time and the response to a small Hamiltonian perturbation enhanced by about two orders of magnitude relative to Gaussian-random systems. If true, this breaks the usual stability-versus-sensitivity tradeoff and points to disordered, symmetry-free platforms for quantum sensing.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the Kossakowski matrix $K = NXX^\dagger/\mathrm{Tr}[XX^\dagger]$, the positive semidefinite matrix of interaction coefficients in the Lindblad master equation; the paper constructs it from a Ginibre random matrix $X$ whose entries are Student's t distributed with tail parameter $\nu$ instead of Gaussian. The argument is carried by the single-big-jump principle: because Student's t tails are regularly varying, unitary changes of the Lindblad operator basis preserve the power-law tail $\mathbb{P}(|X_{ij}|>x)\sim x^{-\nu}$, so the spectral features are claimed to be basis-independent. In the extremely heavy-tail regime ($\nu\le2$) the infinite variance of the couplings produces the single-big-jump domination that creates high-dissipation outliers and a low-dissipation bulk, a nearly gapless Liouvillian spectrum, and quasi-degenerate low-lying states.

What would settle it

Compute the spectral gap $\Delta\lambda$ at $\nu=1$ for increasing system sizes ($N=50,100,200,400$) with the same Student's t construction; if $\Delta\lambda(N)$ saturates to a positive constant instead of shrinking toward zero, the gapless-spectrum claim fails. A second decisive check is to replace Student's t entries with a different infinite-variance distribution with the same tail exponent, such as symmetric $\alpha$-stable noise, and verify that the gap narrowing and coherence enhancement persist; if the effect depends on the distribution's interior, the claimed universality is not established.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central claim is that when the system-environment interaction matrix entering the Lindblad master equation is built from Student's t-distributed entries with $\nu \le 2$, the Liouvillian spectrum reorganizes: a few highly dissipative outlier eigenstates appear, a large low-dissipation bulk forms, the spectral gap $\Delta\lambda$ narrows toward zero as $\nu$ approaches 1, Petermann factors drop (eigenstates become more orthogonal), and near-degenerate eigenvalues become abundant. The paper then shows, in numerical Lindblad dynamics with GUE Hamiltonians and Haar-random initial states, that coherence times grow by one to three orders of magnitude and both coherence-time perturbation and time-averaged coherence perturbation rise by roughly two orders of magnitude compared with Gaussian-random (central-limit-theorem) systems. It concludes that long-lived and ultrasensitive coherence coexist in the same heavy-tailed open quantum system, with quasi-degeneracy supplying sensitivity and gap narrowing supplying longevity.

Load-bearing premise

The central conclusion assumes that the nearly gapless spectrum and the two-order-of-magnitude coherence enhancement seen in the $N=50$ simulations persist in the thermodynamic limit, and that the power-law tail exponent survives arbitrary unitary basis changes of the Lindblad operators; neither is proven by finite-size scaling.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Coherence times in the $\nu\approx1$ regime are predicted to exceed Gaussian-ensemble coherence times by one to three orders of magnitude, with the slowest relaxation set by a spectral gap $\Delta\lambda$ that tends to zero.
  • The same states should respond strongly to weak Hamiltonian perturbations, because quasi-degenerate eigenvalues (nearest-neighbor spacings down to $\sim10^{-5}$) make higher-order perturbation theory dominate.
  • At $\nu=1$ the eigenstates should obey a 20:80 Pareto split: roughly 80% of states sit in the low-dissipation bulk ($\mathrm{Re}\,\lambda\ge-1$) while a minority of outliers carry most dissipation.
  • Long-lived coherence should be achievable with static, random, symmetry-free system-environment interactions, without suppressing interaction strength, adding symmetries or correlations, or using measurement-based protection.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A direct experimental route, not pursued in the paper, would be to engineer reservoirs with tunable heavy-tailed couplings (for example, disorder-controlled photonic or atomic systems) and measure the $\nu$-dependence of coherence time; a sharp change near $\nu=2$ would confirm the central-limit-theorem boundary.
  • The same single-big-jump logic suggests that other infinite-variance distributions with the same tail exponent, not just Student's t, should reproduce the gap narrowing and coherence enhancement, which is a testable universality prediction beyond the paper's explicit numerics.
  • Because the sensitivity mechanism is quasi-degeneracy rather than exceptional points, heavy-tailed open systems may provide a generic route to high-order perturbative sensitivity in disordered non-Hermitian platforms, an implication the paper raises only for sensing rather than for a broader class of non-Hermitian physics.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies Markovian open quantum systems whose system-environment interactions are modeled by a Student-t distributed random matrix X, replacing the Gaussian Ginibre ensemble. The Kossakowski matrix is constructed as K = NXX†/Tr[XX†], and the tail index ν controls a continuous crossover from light-tailed to extremely heavy-tailed statistics. For ν ≤ 2, the 'Extremely Heavy Tail' regime, the authors report a nearly gapless Liouvillian spectrum, a low-dissipation bulk accompanied by high-dissipation outliers, reduced Petermann factors, and an increased density of near-degenerate eigenvalues. Direct Lindblad simulations with GUE Hamiltonians and Haar-random initial states show coherence times and perturbation-induced coherence changes enhanced by roughly two orders of magnitude relative to GinUE predictions. The paper interprets these results as a breakdown of the usual stability-sensitivity tradeoff in open quantum systems.

Significance. If the gapless behavior is confirmed in the thermodynamic limit, the paper identifies a genuinely new mechanism for long-lived coherence in open quantum systems, one that does not rely on decoherence-free subspaces, symmetries, correlated environments, or dynamical decoupling. The numerical work is extensive and transparent: 64 independent realizations of N = 50 systems, 160,000 eigenvalues per ensemble, direct solution of the Lindblad equation, and explicit code and data availability. The qualitative trends are robust across purely dissipative and GUE-Hamiltonian cases, and no target quantity is used to fit parameters, so circularity is not a concern. The main risk is the extrapolation from N = 50 to the claimed gapless limit, which is load-bearing for the headline claims.

major comments (2)
  1. [Tail dependence, Figs. 2e and 3a] The central claim that the spectral gap 'ultimately vanishes (Δλ → 0) near ν = 1' is inferred from ensembles of N = 50 with 64 realizations, with no finite-size scaling presented. This matters because the proposed mechanism is inherently a large-N effect: for ν ≤ 2, the entries of X have infinite variance, and by the single-big-jump principle the sum Tr[XX†] is dominated by the largest entry, driving K toward a rank-one projector. The finite-N gap is then controlled by the small off-rank-one remainder, and whether that remainder vanishes fast enough with N is exactly what determines whether the system is asymptotically gapless. Without a scaling analysis of Δλ versus N (or an analytic bound), the 'two orders of magnitude' enhancement in T2 and the claim of long-lived coherence could be finite-size artifacts rather than genuine CLT-violation effects. Please provide Δλ (and ideally the low-dissipation CCDF and T2) as a function of N for ν = 1 and ν = 2, with the GinUE case as a control.
  2. [Methods, 'Universality in tail behaviours'] The basis-independence argument as written is compressed and mixes regimes. For ν > 2, the entries of X have finite variance, and under unitary transformations the new entries are sums of many terms; the text invokes the single-big-jump principle to claim the tail index is preserved, but that principle is commonly stated for infinite-variance sums. The EHT regime (ν ≤ 2) is the load-bearing case for the paper's main claims, and the argument there is plausible, but the general statement that 'our modelling... allows the examination of universal tail behaviours independent from the chosen basis' needs either an explicit appeal to the regular-variation convolution theorem, valid for all ν > 0, or a clear restriction of the universality claim to the EHT regime. This is a repair, not a rejection, but it should be addressed for the paper to support its stated universality.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Eq. (5)] The definition of ΔCE is garbled in the typeset text; the integral and the prefactor are not readable. Please restore the correct formula.
  2. [Text near Fig. 3] The phrase 'MTH' appears to be a typo for 'MHT' (Moderately Heavy Tail); please correct it.
  3. [Caption of Fig. 2] The caption states that panels (c-e) use the same plot range as panels (a,b), but panel (f) is discussed as showing the full range at ν = 1; please clarify the plotting ranges for all panels, including panel (f).
  4. [Introduction and Eq. (1)] The phrase 'the first standard form' of the GKSL equation is unusual; consider rewording to 'the standard Lindblad form' or similar.
  5. [Data and code availability] The code is identified as 'Q-ROS' and provided as Supplementary Code S1; please confirm that the code archive is complete and that the exact random-generation procedures (including the Student-t sampling algorithm) are documented so the results can be reproduced.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the paper's central results are obtained by direct numerical solution of the Lindblad equation for a specified heavy-tailed random ensemble, with no fitted parameter renamed as a prediction and no load-bearing self-citation chain.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained. The Kossakowski matrix is constructed as K = NXX†/Tr[XX†] with X entries drawn independently from a Student's t distribution, and the Lindblad equation is then solved numerically; spectral gaps, Petermann factors, eigenvalue spacings, coherence times, and perturbation responses are computed from the resulting Liouvillian. No target quantity (e.g., Δλ, T2, or ΔCE) is used to fit a parameter that is later presented as a prediction. The coherence time T2 is obtained by fitting the simulated CE(t) to a single-exponential form, but this is a descriptive reduction of the simulation output, not a prediction of a separate quantity from a fitted parameter. The paper's two self-citations (Refs 5 and 6) appear only as motivational examples of heavy-tailed phenomena in other contexts; they are not invoked to justify the universality claim or the spectral results. The universality argument in Methods relies on the external single-big-jump principle (Ref 29) and on an explicit regularly-varying-tail argument, not on an imported uniqueness theorem from the authors' own work. Concerns about N=50 extrapolation to Δλ→0 and about the range of validity of the single-big-jump argument for ν>2 are correctness or robustness issues, not circularity: even if those arguments fail, the reported finite-N simulations are not manufactured by construction. Accordingly, no circular step meets the evidentiary standard of exhibiting a specific reduction of Eq. X to Eq. Y or a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical entities. Its central claim depends on the modeling choice of Student's t entries, the trace normalization of K, and two hand-picked analysis parameters (perturbation ratio and dissipation threshold). The universality argument rests on the single-big-jump principle, which is a standard tool for regularly varying tails.

free parameters (2)
  • Perturbation scale ratio r = Tr[V]/Tr[H0] = 0.1 (chosen)
    The sensitivity metrics Delta T2 and Delta C_E are computed with a Gaussian random perturbation V whose trace is 10% of the unperturbed Hamiltonian trace. The reported order-of-magnitude sensitivity enhancement depends on this arbitrary ratio; a larger or smaller perturbation would change the numbers.
  • Dissipation threshold Re[lambda] = -1 = -1 (ad hoc)
    Used to define the 'low-dissipation bulk' and the 20:80 Pareto principle. The value -1 is inherited from the GinUE spectral support edge, not derived from the heavy-tailed ensemble; the qualitative Pareto statement depends on this boundary.
assumptions (5)
  • standard math The system evolves under the GKSL Lindblad master equation (Eq. 1)
    The paper assumes Markovian, completely positive, trace-preserving dynamics for the open quantum system.
  • domain assumption Random system-environment interactions are fully characterized by a Kossakowski matrix K = N X X^dagger / Tr[X X^dagger] with Tr[K] = N
    This Gram-matrix construction with fixed trace is taken from prior work (Ref 12) and ensures a fair comparison across realizations, but it is a modeling choice that could affect the heavy-tail results.
  • standard math Entries of X follow a Student's t distribution, representable as a scale mixture of Gaussians (Eq. 7)
    The scale-mixture representation is used to analyze tail preservation under unitary transformations.
  • standard math The single-big-jump principle governs the tail of unitarily transformed sums of heavy-tailed variables
    Used in Methods to argue that P(|X_ij^(U)| > x) ~ x^-nu under basis changes, establishing universality of the tail index.
  • standard math Petermann factor Km bounds the first-order eigenvalue sensitivity via |<rho_mL|Delta L|rho_mL>| <= Km^(1/2) ||Delta L||
    Standard non-Hermitian perturbation theory relating nonorthogonality to sensitivity.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Heavy-tailed open quantum systems reveal long-lived and ultrasensitive coherence." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/Q47ZHVX6

@misc{pith2026250622717,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Heavy-tailed open quantum systems reveal long-lived and ultrasensitive coherence},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/Q47ZHVX6}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.22717}
}
read the original abstract

Understanding random open quantum systems is critical for characterizing the performance of large-scale quantum devices and exploring macroscopic quantum phenomena. Various features in these systems, including spectral distributions, gap scaling, and decoherence, have been examined by modelling randomness under the central limit theorem. Here, we investigate random open quantum systems beyond the central limit theorem, focusing on heavy-tailed system-environment interactions. By extending the Ginibre unitary ensemble, we model system-environment interactions to exhibit a continuous transition from light-tailed to heavy-tailed distributions. This generalized configuration reveals unique properties-gapless spectra, Pareto principle governing dissipation, orthogonalization, and quasi-degeneracies-all linked to the violation of the central limit theorem. The synergy of these features challenges the common belief-the tradeoff between stability and sensitivity-through the emergence of long-lived and ultrasensitive quantum coherences that exhibit an enhancement of two orders of magnitude compared to predictions under the central limit theorem. The result, which is based on heavy-tailedness of open quantum systems, provides highly desirable platforms for quantum sensing applications.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.22717 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Heavy-tailed system-environment interactions. a, ν-dependent phases of the Student’s t distributions determined by their tail thicknesses. b,c, The entire PDFs of Re[Xij] for the t distributions with different ν’s and the GinUE (b) and their enlarged views near the tails (c). Dots and dashed lines in (b,c) denote numerical and theoretical estimations of the PDFs. The PDFs for 64 realizations are overlaid in (b,c). N… view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. Heavy-tailed system-environment interactions. a, ν-dependent phases of the Student’s t distributions determined by their tail thicknesses. b,c, The entire PDFs of Re[Xij] for the t distributions with different ν’s and the GinUE (b) and their enlarged views near the tails (c). Dots and dashed lines in (b,c) denote numerical and theoretical estimations of the PDFs. The PDFs for 64 realizations are overlaid in (b,c). N… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Mapping open quantum dynamics onto graphs

    quant-ph 2026-07 accept novelty 7.0 of 10

    Markovian quantum master equations are exactly equivalent to averaged wave features of operator-valued signals on two uniquely defined magnetic graphs with vertex potentials.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

44 extracted references · 43 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    & Berger, R

    Casella, G. & Berger, R. Statistical inference (CRC press, 2024)

    work page 2024

  2. [2]

    Resnick, S. I. Heavy- tail phenomena: probabilistic and statistical modeling (Springer Science & Business Media, 2007)

    work page 2007

  3. [3]

    & Richter, C

    Gutenberg, B. & Richter, C. F. Frequency of earthquakes in California. Bulletin of the Seismological society of America 34, 185-188 (1944)

    work page 1944

  4. [4]

    & Barabási, A.-L

    Albert, R. & Barabási, A.-L. Statistical mechanics of complex networks. Rev. Mod. Phys. 74, 47 (2002)

    work page 2002

  5. [5]

    Martin, C. H. & Mahoney, M. W. Heavy- tailed universality predicts trends in test accuracies for very large pre- trained deep neural networks . In Proceedings of the 2020 SIAM International Conference on Data Mining 505-513 (2020)

    work page 2020

  6. [6]

    & Park, N

    Yu, S. & Park, N. Heavy tails and pruning in programmable photonic circuits for universal unitaries. Nat. Commun. 14, 1853 (2023)

    work page 2023

  7. [7]

    & Wiersma, D

    Barthelemy, P., Bertolotti, J. & Wiersma, D. S. A Lévy flight for light. Nature 453, 495- 498 (2008)

    work page 2008

  8. [8]

    Bradley, A. S. & Anderson, B. P. Energy spectra of vortex distributions in two-dimensional quantum turbulence. Phys. Rev. X 2, 041001 (2012)

    work page 2012

Show all 44 references
  1. [9]

    & Zeilinger, A

    Erhard, M., Krenn, M. & Zeilinger, A. Advances in high- dimensional quantum entanglement. Nat. Rev. Phys. 2, 365-381 (2020)

    2020

  2. [10]

    & Bromberg, Y

    Lib, O. & Bromberg, Y . Quantum light in complex media and its applications. Nat. Phys. 18, 986-993 (2022)

    2022

  3. [11]

    & Gopalakrishnan, S

    Can, T., Oganesyan, V ., Orgad, D. & Gopalakrishnan, S. Spectral gaps and midgap states 24 in random quantum master equations. Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 234103 (2019)

    2019

  4. [13]

    & Presilla, C

    Popkov, V . & Presilla, C. Full spectrum of the liouvillian of open dissipative quantum systems in the zeno limit. Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 190402 (2021)

    2021

  5. [14]

    & Luitz, D

    Wang, K., Piazza, F. & Luitz, D. J. Hierarchy of relaxation timescales in local random Liouvillians. Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 100604 (2020)

    2020

  6. [15]

    Random lindblad dynamics

    Can, T. Random lindblad dynamics. J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 52, 485302 (2019)

    2019

  7. [16]

    & del Campo, A

    Yang, Y ., Xu, Z. & del Campo, A. Decoherence rate in random Lindblad dynamics. Phys. Rev. Res. 6, 023229 (2024)

    2024

  8. [17]

    Mehta, M. L. Random Matrices (Academic Press, 2004)

    2004

  9. [18]

    Statistical ensembles of complex, quaternion, and real matrices

    Ginibre, J. Statistical ensembles of complex, quaternion, and real matrices. J. Math. Phys. 6, 440-449 (1965)

    1965

  10. [19]

    & Vivo, P

    Livan, G., Novaes, M. & Vivo, P. Introduction to Random Matrices: Theory and Practice (Springer, 2018)

    2018

  11. [20]

    & Cooper, N

    Lieu, S., McGinley, M. & Cooper, N. R. Tenfold way for quadratic Lindbladians. Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 040401 (2020)

    2020

  12. [21]

    & Gopalakrishnan, S

    Orgad, D., Oganesyan, V . & Gopalakrishnan, S. Dynamical transitions from slow to fast relaxation in random open quantum systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 040403 (2024)

    2024

  13. [22]

    & Dobrovitski, V

    Mehmandoost, M. & Dobrovitski, V . Decoherence induced by a sparse bath of two- level fluctuators: Peculiar features of 1/f noise in high-quality qubits. Phys. Rev. Res. 6, 033175 (2024)

    2024

  14. [23]

    Poyatos, J., Cirac, J. I. & Zoller, P. Quantum reservoir engineering with laser cooled 25 trapped ions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 4728 (1996)

    1996

  15. [24]

    & Petruccione, F

    Breuer, H.-P. & Petruccione, F. The theory of open quantum systems (Oxford University Press, 2002)

    2002

  16. [25]

    A short introduction to the Lindblad master equation

    Manzano, D. A short introduction to the Lindblad master equation. Aip advances 10 (2020)

    2020

  17. [26]

    A., Nechita, I

    Życzkowski, K., Penson, K. A., Nechita, I. & Collins, B. Generating random density matrices. J. Math. Phys. 52 (2011)

    2011

  18. [27]

    Ahsanullah, M., Kibria, B. G. & Shakil, M. Normal and Student's t Distributions and Their Applications (Atlantis Press, 2014)

    2014

  19. [28]

    Kwak, S. G. & Kim, J. H. Central limit theorem: the cornerstone of modern statistics. Korean journal of anesthesiology 70, 144 (2017)

    2017

  20. [29]

    & Burioni, R

    Vezzani, A., Barkai, E. & Burioni, R. Single-big-jump principle in physical modeling. Phys. Rev. E 100, 012108 (2019)

    2019

  21. [30]

    Hioe, F. T. & Eberly, J. H. N -level coherence vector and higher conservation laws in quantum optics and quantum mechanics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 47, 838 (1981)

    1981

  22. [31]

    Gyamfi, J. A. Fundamentals of quantum mechanics in Liouville space. European Journal of Physics 41, 063002 (2020)

    2020

  23. [32]

    & Ciuti, C

    Minganti, F., Biella, A., Bartolo, N. & Ciuti, C. Spectral theory of Liouvillians for dissipative phase transitions. Phys. Rev. A 98, 042118 (2018)

    2018

  24. [33]

    Calculated spontaneous emission factor for double-heterostructure injection lasers with gain-induced waveguiding

    Petermann, K. Calculated spontaneous emission factor for double-heterostructure injection lasers with gain-induced waveguiding. IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 15, 566-570 (2003)

    2003

  25. [34]

    & Vahala, K

    Wang, H., Lai, Y .-H., Yuan, Z., Suh, M.-G. & Vahala, K. Petermann-factor sensitivity limit near an exceptional point in a Brillouin ring laser gyroscope. Nat. Commun. 11, 1610 (2020). 26

    2020

  26. [35]

    Barabási, A. -L. & Bonabeau, E. Scale -free networks. Scientific american 288, 60- 69 (2003)

    2003

  27. [36]

    S., Han, X

    Zhou, X., Li, X., Chen, Q., Koolstra, G., Yang, G., Dizdar, B., Huang, Y ., Wang, C. S., Han, X. & Zhang, X. Electron charge qubit with 0.1 millisecond coherence time. Nat. Phys. 20, 116-122 (2024)

    2024

  28. [37]

    A., Chuang, I

    Lidar, D. A., Chuang, I. L. & Whaley, K. B. Decoherence -free subspaces for quantum computation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 2594 (1998)

    1998

  29. [38]

    & Lloyd, S

    Viola, L., Knill, E. & Lloyd, S. Dynamical decoupling of open quantum systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 2417 (1999)

    1999

  30. [39]

    A., Caram, J

    Panitchayangkoon, G., Hayes, D., Fransted, K. A., Caram, J. R., Harel, E., Wen, J., Blankenship, R. E. & Engel, G. S. Long- lived quantum coherence in photosynthetic complexes at physiological temperature. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107, 12766- 12770 (2010)

    2010

  31. [40]

    & Weng, Y

    Zhu, R., Li, W., Zhen, Z., Zou, J., Liao, G., Wang, J., Wang, Z., Chen, H., Qin, S. & Weng, Y . Quantum phase synchronization via exciton- vibrational energy dissipation sustains long-lived coherence in photosynthetic antennas. Nat. Commun. 15, 3171 (2024)

    2024

  32. [41]

    M., Heinzen, D

    Itano, W. M., Heinzen, D. J., Bollinger, J. J. & Wineland, D. J. Quantum zeno effect. Phys. Rev. A 41, 2295 (1990)

    1990

  33. [42]

    L., Reinhard, F

    Degen, C. L., Reinhard, F. & Cappellaro, P. Quantum sensing. Rev. Mod. Phys. 89, 035002 (2017)

    2017

  34. [43]

    & Yang, L

    Chen, W., Kaya Özdemir, Ş., Zhao, G., Wiersig, J. & Yang, L. Exceptional points enhance sensing in an optical microcavity. Nature 548, 192-196 (2017)

    2017

  35. [44]

    Heavy-tailed open quantum systems reveal long-lived and ultrasensitive coherence

    Haar, A. Der Massbegriff in der Theorie der kontinuierlichen Gruppen. Ann. Math., 147- 27 169 (1933). 1 Supplementary Information for “Heavy-tailed open quantum systems reveal long-lived and ultrasensitive coherence” Sunkyu Yu1†, Xianji Piao2§, and Namkyoo Park3* 1Intelligent ...

    1933

  36. [45]

    & Życzkowski, K

    Denisov, S., Laptyeva, T., Tarnowski, W., Chruściński, D. & Życzkowski, K. Universal spectra of random Lindblad operators. Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 140403 (2019)

    2019

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.