REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 25 references
Study on Pentaqaurks by Solving Schrodinger Equation in the Non-Hermitian Quantum Mechanics
T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash
Pith's one-line read Treating Pc(4312)+ as a bound Sigma_c Dbar state, a scalar-meson-exchange Schrödinger equation generates a resonance at 4440 − i34 MeV that the paper proposes corresponds to Pc(4440)+.
desk verdict The exponential well in Eq. (1) is not a Yukawa potential, so the paper's resonance poles — including the Pc(4440) identification — are artifacts of an unjustified potential. read the letter →
The pith
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
The reading
What carries the argument
The central object is the modified Yukawa potential $V(r) = -g^2 e^{-mr}/d$ with force range $d = 1/m$, used as the interaction from scalar-meson exchange. Its function in the argument is to make the Schrödinger equation exactly solvable: with $x = \alpha e^{-\beta r}$, the radial equation becomes a Bessel equation, so bound-state energies are fixed by zeros of $J_\rho(\alpha)$ and resonance energies by zeros of the Hankel function $H_\rho^{(2)}(\alpha)$. The second Hankel function is the outgoing-wave solution, and requiring it to vanish at $r = 0$ enforces the non-Hermitian boundary condition that yields complex eigenvalues $E = M - i\Gamma/2$. The first nonzero zero of $J_\rho(\alpha)$ is used to determine the coupling constant from a measured binding energy; the same $\alpha$ then fixes the resonance position in each channel.
What would settle it
Solve the same two-body Schrödinger equation with the standard Yukawa potential $-g^2 e^{-mr}/r$ using the same fitted coupling and masses; if no pole appears near 4440 − i34 MeV in Sigma_c Dbar scattering, then the proposed Pc(4440)+ correspondence is an artifact of the $d = 1/m$ replacement. Alternatively, a high-precision measurement of the Pc(4440)+ width that excludes the roughly 68 MeV line width implied by $E = 4440 - i34$ MeV would rule out the assignment.
Extended reading notes
Core claim
The author's central claim is that a scalar-meson-exchange potential of the form $V(r) = -g^2 e^{-mr}/d$ with $d = 1/m$ reproduces the observed pentaquark spectrum once the coupling $g$ is fixed by a single bound state. The radial Schrödinger equation with this potential reduces, after the substitution $x = \alpha e^{-\beta r}$, to a Bessel equation; bound states are fixed by zeros of $J_\rho(\alpha)$ and resonance states by zeros of the Hankel function $H_\rho^{(2)}(\alpha)$, which encodes the outgoing-wave condition and makes the energy complex. Fitting Pc(4312)+ as a bound Sigma_c Dbar state gives a resonance at 4440 − i34 MeV, whose real part is within a few MeV of Pc(4440)+, and the analogous calculation for Pc(4457)+ as a bound Sigma_c Dbar* state gives a resonance near 4575 MeV. For the strange channels, placing Pcs(4338)0 at the Xi_c Dbar threshold yields a resonance at 4451 − i1 MeV, and treating Pcs(4459)0 as a Xi_c Dbar* bound state gives a resonance near 4590 MeV. The author notes that only the Sigma_c Dbar resonance has a clear experimental counterpart, while the others are predictions without current PDG matches.
Load-bearing premise
The load-bearing premise is the modified Yukawa potential $V(r) = -g^2 e^{-mr}/d$ with $d = 1/m$, which the paper treats as equivalent to scalar-meson exchange; if this functional form is not faithful, every resonance pole in the paper is an artifact of the chosen shape.
Editorial extensions
If this is right
- Pc(4440)+ would be a Sigma_c Dbar resonance with $J^P = 1/2^-$, and its mass follows directly from the coupling fitted from Pc(4312)+ without additional parameters.
- A Sigma_c Dbar* resonance near 4575 MeV and a Xi_c Dbar* resonance near 4590 MeV are predicted; neither currently has an observed counterpart in the PDG listings.
- The strange and non-strange pentaquark spectra are predicted to be nearly symmetric, since the same scalar-meson exchange works in both sectors.
- All predicted resonance states sit more than 100 MeV above their respective thresholds, in contrast to typical coupled-channel results where bound and resonance states appear near threshold.
- Resonances can be produced in a single-channel Schrödinger equation with a purely outgoing boundary condition, so no coupled-channel sum is needed for their generation.
Reading between the lines
- The predicted width of the Sigma_c Dbar resonance (about 68 MeV from $E = 4440 - i34$ MeV) is roughly three times the measured width of Pc(4440)+; a narrower experimental line shape would require additional mechanisms such as coupled channels or form factors that this single-channel calculation omits.
- Because the paper replaces the $1/r$ denominator in the Yukawa potential with the constant $d = 1/m$, the claim of asymptotic equality is not literally correct; solving the same equations with the standard Yukawa potential $e^{-mr}/r$ would show whether the 4440 MeV pole survives without that approximation.
- If the 4440 MeV pole is confirmed, the same fixed-coupling machinery could be applied to other charmed-baryon–anticharmed-meson pairs, such as $\Sigma_c^*\bar D$, to map a full multiplet of hidden-charm resonances.
- The strange-channel prediction at 4451 MeV lies below the observed Pcs(4459)0, so the model would identify Pcs(4459)0 as something other than the Xi_c Dbar partner; a search for a narrow 4451 MeV J/psi Lambda enhancement could test this.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The manuscript studies the charmed-baryon–anticharmed-meson systems Sigma_c Dbar, Sigma_c Dbar*, Xi_c Dbar, and Xi_c Dbar* as molecular pentaquark candidates. It assumes a scalar-meson-exchange interaction, replaces the Yukawa 1/r denominator by a constant force range d = 1/m, solves the S-wave Schrodinger equation analytically with Bessel functions, fixes each channel's coupling from the binding energy of a known pentaquark, and then imposes outgoing-wave boundary conditions to obtain complex-energy poles. The Sigma_c Dbar pole near 4440 - i34 MeV is identified with Pc(4440)+, and analogous resonances are reported near 4451, 4575, and 4591 MeV in the strange and nonstrange channels.
Significance. The analytic reduction to a Bessel equation is clean, and the resonance poles are genuine outputs of the chosen boundary condition rather than inserted by hand; the paper also makes concrete, falsifiable predictions for unobserved states. These strengths are, however, attached to a potential that is not the scalar-exchange interaction claimed in the text, and the single quantitative match to Pc(4440)+ has a width discrepancy of a factor of three to six. The central claim therefore does not survive scrutiny: the predicted poles inherit an unjustified functional form and a coupling calibrated on the same states being described.
major comments (4)
- [Section II, Eq. (1)] The potential V(r) = -g^2 e^{-mr}/d with d = 1/m is -g^2 m e^{-mr}, an exponential well, not a Yukawa potential. The statement that it 'is equal to the original Yukawa potential asymptotically at infinity' is false: the ratio of Eq. (1) to -g^2 e^{-mr}/r is mr, which diverges as r grows. The 1/r tail is the defining long-range part of one-boson exchange, and because the same V is used both to fit the bound states and to generate the resonances, the functional form in Eq. (1) is a load-bearing unphysical input.
- [Sections III and IV, Tables I and II] The coupling g is calibrated separately in each channel using the binding energy of the same bound state whose companion resonance is then predicted (e.g., Pc(4312)+ for the Sigma_c Dbar pole and Pc(4457)+ for the Sigma_c Dbar* pole). The resonance poles are therefore outputs of a potential fitted to the states being described, and no sensitivity study is provided for the input binding energies or for the scalar-meson mass. The claim that the 4440 MeV pole supports the molecular interpretation requires showing that the pole is robust under the uncertainties in these inputs.
- [Section III, Table I] The predicted widths contradict the identification with Pc(4440)+. The four complex energies 4440 - i34, 4440 - i38, 4445 - i64, and 4437 - i64 imply total widths of 68, 76, 128, and 128 MeV, respectively, whereas the PDG value quoted in the same table is 20.6^{+4.9}_{-10.1} MeV. This factor-of-three-to-six width discrepancy is not addressed, and without a mechanism that reduces the width, the mass agreement alone is not evidence for the assignment.
- [Sections III-VI] The scalar-meson mass is set to m_sigma = 440 or 390 MeV by hand, with no derivation from the f0(500) parameters and no uncertainty estimate. Since d = 1/m_sigma enters rho, alpha, g^2, and the resonance energy through Eqs. (7) and (10), the numerical predictions depend on an undetermined input. A parameter scan and an uncertainty propagation are necessary before any of the reported poles can be claimed as predictions rather than artifacts of the chosen m_sigma.
minor comments (5)
- [Title and general text] The manuscript contains many typos and infelicities, including 'Pentaqaurks', 'Schrodinger', 'significancy', 'sequently', and 'spectrums'; a careful proofread is needed.
- [Section II, Eq. (5)] Equation (5) is very hard to read as printed, and the exponent involving 1/(d beta) is unclear; the paper also does not state that natural units with hbar = 1 are used. Please rewrite Eq. (5) and state the unit convention explicitly.
- [Table I] The column header I^G(J^PC) lists '1/2^+(??)' for Pc(4440)+; this quantum-number assignment is not established and should either be justified or removed.
- [Section II, Ref. [24]] Reference [24] is cited for the Yukawa-type potential, but Eq. (1) is not the potential used in that reference; the relation to the on-shell approximation should be made explicit.
- [Section V] Treating Pcs(4338)0 as a bound state with exactly zero binding energy is a singular assumption; the experimental mass uncertainty should be propagated into alpha and the predicted pole position.
Circularity Check
No significant circularity: the resonance poles are genuine outputs of the model, and the only self-citation is not load-bearing.
full rationale
The paper's derivation chain is not circular under the provided definitions. The coupling g is fixed from the observed Pc(4312) binding energy using the bound-state condition Eq. (9) (Jρ(α)=0), giving α and ρ. The resonance energy is then obtained from the independent outgoing-wave condition Eq. (11) (Hρ(2)(α)=0) with the same α, and is converted to a complex energy via Eq. (7). The claimed Pc(4440) mass and width are not inserted as inputs; they are outputs of solving Eq. (11) for complex ρ. The only self-citation is Ref. [22], which is cited in the introduction as a prior application of the same Schrödinger-solution method, but the method is re-derived in Section II rather than imported as a load-bearing theorem. The questionable replacement r→d=1/m in Eq. (1) and the choice mσ=440 MeV are model-correctness and parameter-sensitivity concerns, not circularity: the predicted pole does not reduce to the input binding energy by construction, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. The calculation therefore qualifies as self-contained against its own stated assumptions, with no circular step meeting the quoted-equation standard.
Assumptions & free parameters
free parameters (3)
- m_sigma (scalar meson mass) =
440 MeV (default), 390 MeV (when decay widths included)
- g^2 (coupling squared per channel) =
e.g., g=0.55 for Xi_c Dbar; others implied by alpha=2.88 to 3.76
- B(Xi_c Dbar) binding energy =
0 MeV
assumptions (5)
- standard math Bessel functions J_rho and Hankel functions H^(2)_rho have the required zeros, and the zeros can be continued to complex order.
- domain assumption The charmed baryon-anticharmed meson interaction is dominated by scalar f0(500) exchange with a single Yukawa-type potential.
- domain assumption The pentaquarks are S-wave (l=0) two-body bound states/resonances, so spin and parity are assigned without coupled partial waves.
- ad hoc to paper Replacing the Yukawa denominator 1/r by d=1/m preserves the physics; the modified potential is claimed to match Yukawa at infinity.
- domain assumption Outgoing-wave boundary condition H^(2)_rho(alpha)=0 identifies physical resonances with complex energies E=M-iGamma/2.
invented entities (1)
-
Predicted unobserved resonances: Sigma_c Dbar* at about 4575 MeV, Xi_c Dbar at about 4451 MeV, Xi_c Dbar* at about 4591 MeV
Cite this review
Pith. "Pith review of Study on Pentaqaurks by Solving Schrodinger Equation in the Non-Hermitian Quantum Mechanics." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/KN5A6UO4
@misc{pith2026250622723,
author = {Pith},
title = {Pith review of: Study on Pentaqaurks by Solving Schrodinger Equation in the Non-Hermitian Quantum Mechanics},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/KN5A6UO4}},
note = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.22723}
}
abstract
The interaction of the charmed baryon and the anticharmed meson is assumed to be realized by exchanging a scalar meson of $f_0(500)$, and then these systems are studied by solving the Schrodinger equation, respectively. When the pentaquarks $P_{c\bar{c}}(4312)^{+}$, $P_{c\bar{c}}(4457)^{+}$, $P_{c\bar{c}s}(4338)^0$, and $P_{c\bar{c}s}(4459)^{0}$ are treated as $\Sigma_c \bar{D}$, $\Sigma_c \bar{D}^*$, $\Xi_c \bar{D}$ and $\Xi_c \bar{D}^*$ bound states, four resonance states of them are obtained as solutions of the Schrodinger equation under the outgoing wave condition, respectively. The resonance state of $\Sigma_c \bar{D}$ might correspond to the particle $P_{c\bar{c}}(4440)^{+}$, while the other three resonance states have no counterparts in the review of the Particle Data Group(PDG). Although the binding energy of the bound state is only several MeVs, all these resonance states are more than 100 MeV higher than their corresponding thresholds, respectively. The calculation results indicate that the spectrums of the strange and non-strange pentaquarks are symmetric to each other.
Figures
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
A Schematic Model of Baryons and Mesons,
M. Gell-Mann, “A Schematic Model of Baryons and Mesons,” Phys. Lett. 8, 214-215 (1964)
work page 1964
-
[2]
W. M. Yao et al. [Particle Data Group], “Review of Particle Physics,” J. Phy s. G 33, 1-1232 (2006)
work page 2006
-
[3]
Observation of J/ψp Resonances Consistent with Pentaquark States in Λ 0 b →J/ψK −p Decays,
R. Aaij et al. [LHCb], “Observation of J/ψp Resonances Consistent with Pentaquark States in Λ 0 b →J/ψK −p Decays,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 072001 (2015)
work page 2015
-
[4]
Observation of a narrow pentaquark state, Pc(4312)+, and of two-peak structure of the Pc(4450)+,
R. Aaij et al. [LHCb], “Observation of a narrow pentaquark state, Pc(4312)+, and of two-peak structure of the Pc(4450)+,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, no.22, 222001 (2019)
work page 2019
-
[5]
Evidence of a J/ψΛ structure and observation of excited Ξ − states in the Ξ − b →J/ψΛK − decay,
R. Aaij et al. [LHCb], “Evidence of a J/ψΛ structure and observation of excited Ξ − states in the Ξ − b →J/ψΛK − decay,” Sci. Bull. 66, 1278-1287 (2021)
work page 2021
-
[6]
R. Aaij et al. [LHCb], “Observation of a J/ ψΛ Resonance Consistent with a Strange Pen- taquark Candidate in B- →J/ψΛp/macron.ts1 Decays,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, no.3, 031901 (2023) 14
work page 2023
-
[7]
Prediction of na rrowN ∗ and Λ ∗ resonances with hidden charm above 4 GeV,
J. J. Wu, R. Molina, E. Oset and B. S. Zou, “Prediction of na rrowN ∗ and Λ ∗ resonances with hidden charm above 4 GeV,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 232001 (2010)
work page 2010
-
[8]
Decay behaviors of possi ble Λ c¯c states in hadronic molecule pictures,
C. W. Shen, J. J. Wu and B. S. Zou, “Decay behaviors of possi ble Λ c¯c states in hadronic molecule pictures,” Phys. Rev. D 100, no.5, 056006 (2019)
work page 2019
Show all 25 references
-
[9]
Possible strange hidden-charm pentaquarks from Σ (∗) c ¯D∗ s and Ξ(′,∗) c ¯D∗ interactions,
R. Chen, J. He and X. Liu, “Possible strange hidden-charm pentaquarks from Σ (∗) c ¯D∗ s and Ξ(′,∗) c ¯D∗ interactions,” Chin. Phys. C 41, no.10, 103105 (2017)
2017
-
[10]
Heavy quark spin symme tric molecular states from ¯D(∗)Σ(∗) c and other coupled channels in the light of the recent LHCb pen taquarks,
C. W. Xiao, J. Nieves and E. Oset, “Heavy quark spin symme tric molecular states from ¯D(∗)Σ(∗) c and other coupled channels in the light of the recent LHCb pen taquarks,” Phys. Rev. D 100, no.1, 014021 (2019)
2019
-
[11]
Prediction of hidden c harm strange molecular baryon states with heavy quark spin symmetry,
C. W. Xiao, J. Nieves and E. Oset, “Prediction of hidden c harm strange molecular baryon states with heavy quark spin symmetry,” Phys. Lett. B 799, 135051 (2019)
2019
-
[12]
C oupled-channel effects of the Σc(*)D /macron.ts1 (*)-Λc(2595)D/macron.ts1 system and molecular nature of the Pc pentaquark states from one-boson exchange model,
N. Yalikun, Y. H. Lin, F. K. Guo, Y. Kamiya and B. S. Zou, “C oupled-channel effects of the Σc(*)D /macron.ts1 (*)-Λc(2595)D/macron.ts1 system and molecular nature of the Pc pentaquark states from one-boson exchange model,” Phys. Rev. D 104, no.9, 094039 (2021)
2021
-
[13]
Emergence of a complete heavy-quark spin symm etry multiplet: seven molecular pentaquarks in light of the latest LHCb analysis,
M. Z. Liu, Y. W. Pan, F. Z. Peng, M. S´ anchez S´ anchez, L. S . Geng, A. Hosaka and M. Pavon Valderrama, “Emergence of a complete heavy-quark spin symm etry multiplet: seven molecular pentaquarks in light of the latest LHCb analysis,” Phys. Rev . Lett. 122, no.24, 242001 (2019)
2019
-
[14]
Probing hidden-charm decay properties of Pc states in a molecular scenario,
G. J. Wang, L. Y. Xiao, R. Chen, X. H. Liu, X. Liu and S. L. Zh u, “Probing hidden-charm decay properties of Pc states in a molecular scenario,” Phys. Rev. D 102, no.3, 036012 (2020) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.102.036012 [arXiv:1911.09613 [he p-ph]]
2020 arXiv
-
[15]
How to reveal t he nature of three or more pentaquark states,
C. W. Xiao, J. X. Lu, J. J. Wu and L. S. Geng, “How to reveal t he nature of three or more pentaquark states,” Phys. Rev. D 102, no.5, 056018 (2020)
2020
-
[16]
Spectrum of the strange hi dden charm molecular pen- taquarks in chiral effective field theory,
B. Wang, L. Meng and S. L. Zhu, “Spectrum of the strange hi dden charm molecular pen- taquarks in chiral effective field theory,” Phys. Rev. D 101, no.3, 034018 (2020)
2020
-
[17]
Pentaq uark and Tetraquark states,
Y. R. Liu, H. X. Chen, W. Chen, X. Liu and S. L. Zhu, “Pentaq uark and Tetraquark states,” Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 107, 237-320 (2019)
2019
-
[18]
Analysis of P cs(4338) and related pentaquark molecular states via QCD sum rules*,
X. W. Wang and Z. G. Wang, “Analysis of P cs(4338) and related pentaquark molecular states via QCD sum rules*,” Chin. Phys. C 47, no.1, 013109 (2023)
2023
-
[19]
Compact pentaquark str uctures,
E. Santopinto and A. Giachino, “Compact pentaquark str uctures,” Phys. Rev. D 96, no.1, 014014 (2017)
2017
-
[20]
Hidden-ch arm pentaquark states in a mass 15 splitting model,
S. Y. Li, Y. R. Liu, Z. L. Man, Z. G. Si and J. Wu, “Hidden-ch arm pentaquark states in a mass 15 splitting model,” Phys. Rev. D 108, no.5, 056015 (2023) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.056015 [arXiv:2307.00539 [hep-ph]]
2023 arXiv
-
[21]
Review of particle physics,
S. Navas et al. [Particle Data Group], “Review of particle physics,” Phys. Rev. D 110, no.3, 030001 (2024)
2024
-
[22]
The possible KK /macron.ts1 * and DD /macron.ts1 * bound and resonance states by solving the Schrodinger equation,
B. X. Sun, Q. Q. Cao and Y. T. Sun, “The possible KK /macron.ts1 * and DD /macron.ts1 * bound and resonance states by solving the Schrodinger equation,” Commun. Theor . Phys. 76, no.10, 105301 (2024)
2024
-
[23]
Karliner, Hidden Charm Molecular Pentaqaurks: Some Open Questions in Proc
M. Karliner, Hidden Charm Molecular Pentaqaurks: Some Open Questions in Proc. Bled Mini-Workshop, Slovenia, July 15-19, 2019, B. Golli et al., Eds., p. 25, http://www- f1.ijs.si/BledPub/bled2019.pdf
2019
-
[24]
Effective field theory for the nucleon-quarkonium interac- tion,
J. Tarr´ us Castell` a and G. Krein, “Effective field theory for the nucleon-quarkonium interac- tion,” Phys. Rev. D 98, no.1, 014029 (2018)
2018
-
[25]
Moiseyev, Non-Hermitian Quantum Mechanics , Cambridge University Press, New York, 2011
N. Moiseyev, Non-Hermitian Quantum Mechanics , Cambridge University Press, New York, 2011. 16
2011
Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.