Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 49 references

TOMI: Transforming and Organizing Music Ideas for Multi-Track Compositions with Full-Song Structure

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read TOMI argues that a sparse graph of reusable clips, sections, tracks, and transformations, planned by a large language model, can generate full-song electronic music with stronger structural coherence than audio-generation baselines.

desk verdict TOMI's sparse graph-plus-LLM arrangement workflow is a real, useful contribution, but its structural-coherence claims rest partly on a metric that rewards its own copy mechanism. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.23094 v1 pith:YONLD26B submitted 2025-06-29 cs.SD cs.AIeess.AS

Qi He , Gus Xia , Ziyu Wang This is my paper
classification cs.SDcs.AIeess.AS
keywords concepthierarchymusicgenerationmulti-trackcompositionin-contextlearninglargelanguagemodelstructuralcoherenceelectroniclink
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

TOMI sets out to show that full-song, multi-track electronic music can be generated by planning at the level of music ideas rather than by scaling up note- or audio-level generation. The system represents a composition as a sparse set of reusable clips (short MIDI or audio segments), sections (where in time), tracks (which instrument layer), and transformations (how the clip is changed), stitched together by composition links. A text-based LLM, prompted in-context, fills in the links, after which sample retrieval and a digital audio workstation render the song. The paper reports lower Fréchet Audio Distance and higher Inter-Phrase Latent Similarity than a strong text-to-music baseline and two ablations, plus higher listener ratings on most structural and quality metrics, supporting the claim that concept hierarchy is a viable path to long-form music generation.

What carries the argument

The composition link is a quadruple (section, track, clip, transformation) in which all four node types are reusable objects, so one clip can appear in multiple sections or tracks under different transformations. Sections are temporal spans with a phrase label (verse, chorus, etc.), and a reused section node keeps identical content across its occurrences. The LLM is prompted to output this structure as text in a fixed order (sections, tracks, clips, transformations, links), with a rule-based validator catching and correcting syntax errors, and clip features are later used to retrieve real MIDI and audio samples from curated databases. This lets the LLM perform global arrangement planning without generating a single audio sample itself.

What would settle it

An experiment that varies repeated sections to be non-identical while preserving the TOMI graph, then recomputes Inter-Phrase Latent Similarity and listener ratings, would show whether the structural advantage comes from planning coherence or simply from playing the same audio region twice.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim, stated in the abstract and evaluation, is that a sparse four-node representation of clips, sections, tracks, and transformations, operated by an LLM through in-context learning, produces electronic music with tighter phrase boundaries, better phrase development, and clearer full-song structure than audio-generation baselines. The paper presents objective results where TOMI attains the lowest Fréchet Audio Distance and the highest Inter-Phrase Latent Similarity across three latent representations, and subjective results where listeners rate it above the alternatives on most questions. This is offered as evidence that concept hierarchy—transforming and organizing a small set of musical ideas—can handle long-form structure that larger end-to-end models still struggle to achieve.

Load-bearing premise

The paper's structural-coherence claim leans on the Inter-Phrase Latent Similarity metric rating identical repeated sections as strongly coherent, so if identical reuse is not what listeners mean by musical structure, the quantitative support weakens.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the claim holds, long-form musical structure can be composed by planning over a sparse set of ideas rather than learned by ever-larger generative models.
  • The same text-serialized graph can let users steer a full song by describing sections, moods, and transformations in natural language, then edit the result in a digital audio workstation.
  • Because clips are retrieved from a sample library, the system's output is bounded by that library; the paper's future-work integration of generative clip models would remove that bound.
  • The LLM's role is arrangement rather than sound synthesis, so the same pipeline could operate over any library of audio or MIDI assets.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The Inter-Phrase Latent Similarity metric may be measuring node-reuse identity more than perceived musical coherence, so a fairer comparison against a baseline that also reuses exact audio would be a stricter test of the structural claim.
  • The four-node composition-link abstraction could transfer to other structured creative media where a small set of assets is transformed and placed in time and space, such as video editing or interactive audio.
  • A testable extension would replace the closed instruction-tuned LLM with an open-weight model and measure how much of the quality depends on the underlying model's reasoning ability.
  • The relative contribution of sample-library quality versus arrangement logic to the objective scores is not separately measured, so an ablation that controls the same clips across methods would clarify the mechanism.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper introduces TOMI, a representation and generation system for multi-track electronic music with full-song structure. Music is represented as composition links over four node types (clips, sections, tracks, and transformations); a foundation LLM (GPT-4o) fills in the nodes via in-context learning, and the outputs are rendered through REAPER. The authors compare TOMI against MusicGen, a Standalone LLM without composition links, and a Random ablation that uses the same sample library. They report FAD and ILS objective metrics and a 73-participant subjective study, concluding that TOMI produces higher-quality electronic music with stronger structural coherence than the baselines.

Significance. TOMI is a timely and practical contribution: it offers a sparse, interpretable structure for long-form music generation, integrates symbolic and audio material, and ships with code and a demo page. The Random ablation is a well-designed control because it holds the sample library and the TOMI data structure fixed, isolating the contribution of LLM-driven arrangement decisions; the fact that Random underperforms TOMI despite using the same professional samples strengthens the claim that arrangement logic matters. If the evaluation concerns below are addressed, the paper would provide credible evidence for a concept-hierarchy approach to full-song electronic music generation.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 3.1.2 and Eq. (2)] The ILS metric is partly circular with respect to TOMI's own representation. Because Section 3.1.2 specifies that a reused section node has identical musical content, and Figure 2b shows that reusing a section automatically duplicates the same composition links, any same-label pair of segments generated from the same section/clip nodes will have near-identical embeddings. Eq. (2) averages cosine similarities of all same-label pairs, so these identical copies mechanically inflate X_same and, through low within-group variance, can inflate Cohen's d in Eq. (1). Thus the ILS advantage reported in Table 2 does not cleanly separate 'good same-label development' from 'exact copy by construction,' particularly in comparisons against MusicGen and Standalone LLM, which lack this reuse mechanism. Please recompute ILS excluding pairs of segments that come from the same section/clip node, or report a version that evaluates only non-identical same-label segments; this is load-bearing for the objective structural-consistency claim.
  2. [Section 4.3, Table 2] The FAD results are reported as point estimates without confidence intervals, bootstrap resampling, or significance tests. With 32 generated pieces per method and a single reference set of 329 songs, the differences in Table 2 (e.g., FAD_VGGish 3.51 vs. 5.31) could be within sampling noise. Please provide bootstrap confidence intervals or per-piece FAD distributions, and if possible a statistical comparison; without this, the claim that TOMI 'achieves the lowest FAD scores' is not quantitatively supported.
  3. [Sections 4.2 and 4.3] The comparison against MusicGen is confounded by the source of audio material. TOMI retrieves and assembles professionally produced sample-library loops, while MusicGen synthesizes audio from text; FAD measures distributional closeness to human-composed electronic music, so TOMI's lower FAD may largely reflect the use of real samples rather than its arrangement logic. The Random and Standalone LLM ablations do control for the sample library, and those comparisons are meaningful for the arrangement-logic claim, but the paper should not present the MusicGen FAD comparison as evidence of higher generation quality without explicitly stating this confound. Please reframe the quality claim as a system-level comparison or restrict the controlled quality claim to the sample-based ablations.
  4. [Section 4.4 and Figure 4] The paper states that TOMI 'significantly outperforms the baseline in most subjective metrics,' but it reports only mean scores and confidence intervals from a within-subject ANOVA, with no F-statistics, p-values, or post-hoc test results. Given that the subjective study carries much of the structural-coherence claim after the ILS concern, please report the actual statistical test outcomes (e.g., ANOVA tables and pairwise comparisons), or soften the wording to describe descriptive differences.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Table 2] The table reports FAD as point estimates while ILS columns include mean plus/minus standard deviation; please clarify whether FAD is computed as a single value or has a repeated-measures distribution, and if so, report its variance in the same way.
  2. [Eq. (1) and Section 3.1.2] The symbol 's' is used both for the pooled standard deviation in Eq. (4) and as a subscript for section nodes (e.g., s2, s3); using a different symbol such as 's_pool' or 'sigma' for the standard deviation would improve readability.
  3. [Section 4.4] The survey is described as double-blind, but it is not clear how participants could be blind to the method when hearing full songs of different production quality; please describe the blinding procedure in more detail.
  4. [Figure 3] The caption states 'Darker colors indicate higher segment similarity,' which is conventional, but the colorbar or a brief explanation of the colormap would help readers interpret the matrices consistently.
  5. [Section 3.2] The rule-based validation is mentioned but not evaluated; reporting the frequency of syntax errors or invalid values across the 32 generated compositions would give a sense of the LLM's reliability in following the TOMI schema.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

ILS partly rewards TOMI's hard-coded section reuse, so the objective structural-coherence advantage is partly an artifact of the representation.

  1. self definitional [Section 3.1.2 and Section 4.3, Eq. (2)]
    "A section node can appear multiple times within a composition, meaning its music content remains identical across instances. ... ILS aims to compute a self-similarity matrix of musical features and evaluates if the average similarity between segments sharing the same phrase label is higher than those with different labels."

    Eq. (2) defines the same-label term of ILS as the mean cosine similarity between all segments sharing a phrase label. Section 3.1.2 builds exact identity into the method: a reused section node has the same musical content at every occurrence, and Section 3.1.5 adds that such reused sections share the same composition links. Thus, whenever TOMI reuses a section node for a repeated phrase, the same-label comparisons in Eq. (2) include exactly identical audio, pushing X_same toward 1 and inflating the Cohen's d score in Eq. (1). Part of the reported ILS advantage over MusicGen and the Standalone LLM is therefore a direct consequence of the representation, not an emergent measure of musically meaningful coherence.

  2. other [Section 4.4, Part 2 (subjective evaluation)]
    "Part 2. Consistency Among Same-Label Phrases This part consists of 2 subparts, each selecting two sections with the same phrase label (e.g., verse 1 and verse 2) from each composition. Participants rate Similarity between the two sections."

    This subjective item directly asks listeners to reward the property that Section 3.1.2 hard-codes: when a section node is reused, its occurrences are literally the same content. Higher Part-2 similarity ratings for TOMI can therefore reflect exact repetition built into the data structure rather than an independent judgment of coherent musical development. This does not invalidate the other subjective measures, but it means the same-label consistency evidence is partly confounded with the representation's own identity mechanism.

full rationale

The main circular step is confined to the structural-coherence evidence. ILS is defined as same-label minus different-label latent similarity (Eqs. 1-3), and TOMI's section-node reuse (Sec. 3.1.2, Fig. 2b) makes same-label sections identical by construction whenever a node is reused. Consequently, a substantial part of the ILS gap in Table 2 is a built-in property of the representation rather than an independent measurement of musical coherence. The Random ablation shares the composition-link structure, so the metric is not fully vacuous, but it still cannot separate emergent same-label development from literal duplication. The subjective Part-2 Similarity rating has the same confound. The FAD comparison against Spotify Mint and the remaining subjective parts (local quality, transition naturalness, overall full-song evaluation) are independent of this mechanism and provide real, non-circular support for generation quality. There is no load-bearing self-citation chain: the ILS refinement is attributed to the authors' prior work [9], but the metric is fully redefined in this paper, so that citation is not doing circular work. Overall, the central quality claim has independent content, but the quantitative structural-coherence claim is partially reduced by construction, giving a score of 6.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 2 invented entities

The central claim does not depend on any fitted numeric parameter; tempo (120 BPM), the four keys, and the section sequences are experimental conditions. The main conceptual baggage is the TOMI representation itself and the domain assumptions about the evaluation metrics and the sample databases. The composition link and section-reuse identity are invented constructs with no independent evidence outside the system.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Same-label sections should have high latent similarity and different-label sections low latent similarity; this is a meaningful definition of structural coherence.
    The ILS metric (Eq. 1-3) operationalizes structural consistency this way, and the paper's section-node reuse guarantees the same-label side of this assumption.
  • domain assumption FAD computed against 329 Spotify Mint tracks is a valid proxy for human-composed electronic music quality.
    Section 4.3 uses this reference set to rank all methods; if the reference set is not representative, the FAD ordering loses meaning.
  • domain assumption GPT-4o with in-context learning and rule-based validation can reliably generate sensible TOMI instances.
    Section 3.2 builds the entire generation pipeline on this; no analysis of failure rates or validation loop iterations is reported.
  • domain assumption Feature labels in the MIDI and audio databases are sufficient for retrieving clips that match the LLM's intended musical ideas.
    Section 3.1.1 and 4.1 rely on this, and the conclusion explicitly acknowledges empty results or highly divergent samples as a limitation.
  • ad hoc to paper The four-node TOMI representation, including identity-preserving section reuse, adequately captures music concept hierarchy for composition.
    This is the paper's central invented abstraction; it is not derived from prior theory and is validated only through the system's own evaluations.
invented entities (2)
  • TOMI composition link (section, track, clip, transformation quadruple)
    purpose: Connects a reusable clip to a temporal position, an instrument layer, and an elaboration method, forming the full arrangement.
    Core invented representation; its value is only shown by the paper's FAD, ILS, and subjective results, not by an external benchmark or falsifiable prediction.
  • Identity-preserving section node reuse
    purpose: Makes repeated sections contain exactly the same musical content so the composition has built-in long-term repetition.
    This design mechanically raises same-label similarity in the ILS metric; it is a representational choice rather than an empirically discovered phenomenon.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of TOMI: Transforming and Organizing Music Ideas for Multi-Track Compositions with Full-Song Structure." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/YONLD26B

@misc{pith2026250623094,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: TOMI: Transforming and Organizing Music Ideas for Multi-Track Compositions with Full-Song Structure},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/YONLD26B}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.23094}
}
read the original abstract

Hierarchical planning is a powerful approach to model long sequences structurally. Aside from considering hierarchies in the temporal structure of music, this paper explores an even more important aspect: concept hierarchy, which involves generating music ideas, transforming them, and ultimately organizing them--across musical time and space--into a complete composition. To this end, we introduce TOMI (Transforming and Organizing Music Ideas) as a novel approach in deep music generation and develop a TOMI-based model via instruction-tuned foundation LLM. Formally, we represent a multi-track composition process via a sparse, four-dimensional space characterized by clips (short audio or MIDI segments), sections (temporal positions), tracks (instrument layers), and transformations (elaboration methods). Our model is capable of generating multi-track electronic music with full-song structure, and we further integrate the TOMI-based model with the REAPER digital audio workstation, enabling interactive human-AI co-creation. Experimental results demonstrate that our approach produces higher-quality electronic music with stronger structural coherence compared to baselines.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

49 extracted references · 31 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    TOMI: Transforming and Organizing Music Ideas for Multi-Track Compositions with Full-Song Structure

    INTRODUCTION Automatic music generation has advanced from producing short clips to composing entire pieces, yet long-term struc- ture remains a major challenge. Unlike short-term genera- tion, which focuses on capturing local patterns [1–6], long- term generation requires handling structure across multiple levels, from sectional repetition and cadence to ...

    work page Pith review arXiv 2025

  2. [2]

    The proposed data structure integrates symbolic and audio representations and can be manipulated by text-based LLMs via ICL

    We introduce TOMI to model music concept hierar- chy and develop a deep learning-based system for struc- tured electronic music generation. The proposed data structure integrates symbolic and audio representations and can be manipulated by text-based LLMs via ICL

    work page

  3. [3]

    Objective and subjective evaluations show that songs generated by our model have clearer phrase boundaries, better phrase de- velopment, and higher music quality than the baselines

    We apply our system to generate high-quality elec- tronic music with full-song structure . Objective and subjective evaluations show that songs generated by our model have clearer phrase boundaries, better phrase de- velopment, and higher music quality than the baselines

    work page

  4. [4]

    We integrate TOMI with the REAPER digital audio workstation, providing seamless connection with pro- fessional music software interface and enabling human- AI co-creation with high-resolution audio rendering

    work page

  5. [5]

    Jukebox [7] uses hierarchical VQ-V AE with time conditioning to enhance long-term coherence; Wanget al

    RELA TED WORK In automatic music generation, many studies focus on gen- erating coherent music segments [1–6], while fewer focus on modeling long-term structure under the temporal hier- archy of music. Jukebox [7] uses hierarchical VQ-V AE with time conditioning to enhance long-term coherence; Wanget al. [9] applies cascaded diffusion models for struc- tu...

    work page

  6. [6]

    METHODOLOGY In this section, we discuss TOMI in multi-track electronic music generation with full-song structure. The implemen- tation consists of two main components: (1) a graph data structure named composition link that connects raw mu- sic ideas with the composition (Section 3.1), and (2) in- context learning to compose music by following this data st...

    work page

  7. [7]

    We evaluate our approach with baseline meth- ods and use both objective and subjective measurements to compare the music quality and structural consistency

    EXPERIMENT To implement the generation system, we prepare a MIDI database and an audio database for clip sample retrieval and use GPT-4o [29] to generate compositions in TOMI schema. We evaluate our approach with baseline meth- ods and use both objective and subjective measurements to compare the music quality and structural consistency. 4.1 System Prepar...

    work page

  8. [8]

    Ex- perimental results show that our approach achieves high- quality generation with robust structural consistency

    CONCLUSION AND FUTURE WORK We contribute TOMI, a concept hierarchy paradigm for music representation, and combine it with an ICL approach to achieve the first system for generating long-term, multi- track electronic music with both MIDI and audio clips. Ex- perimental results show that our approach achieves high- quality generation with robust structural ...

    work page

Show all 49 references
  1. [9]

    Symbolic music generation with non-differentiable rule guided diffusion,

    Y . Huang, A. Ghatare, Y . Liu, Z. Hu, Q. Zhang, C. S. Sastry, S. Gururani, S. Oore, and Y . Yue, “Symbolic music generation with non-differentiable rule guided diffusion,” in Forty-first International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML 2024, Vienna, Austria, July 21-27, 202...

    2024

  2. [10]

    Controllable deep melody generation via hierarchical music structure representation,

    S. Dai, Z. Jin, C. Gomes, and R. B. Dannenberg, “Controllable deep melody generation via hierarchical music structure representation,” in Proceedings of the 22nd International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference, ISMIR 2021, Online, November 7-12, 2021 , J. H. L...

    2021

  3. [11]

    Polyffusion: A diffusion model for polyphonic score generation with internal and external controls,

    L. Min, J. Jiang, G. Xia, and J. Zhao, “Polyffusion: A diffusion model for polyphonic score generation with internal and external controls,” in Proceedings of the 24th International Society for Music Information Re- trieval Conference, ISMIR, 2023

    2023

  4. [12]

    Riffusion-stable diffusion for real-time music generation,

    S. Forsgren and H. Martiros, “Riffusion-stable diffusion for real-time music generation,” URL https://riffusion.com/about, 2022

    2022

  5. [13]

    DeepBach: a steerable model for Bach chorales generation,

    G. Hadjeres, F. Pachet, and F. Nielsen, “DeepBach: a steerable model for Bach chorales generation,” in Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Machine Learning , ser. Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, D. Precup and Y . W. Teh, Eds., vol. 70. International C...

    2017

  6. [14]

    Musiclm: Generating music from text,

    A. Agostinelli, T. I. Denk, Z. Borsos, J. H. Engel, M. Verzetti, A. Caillon, Q. Huang, A. Jansen, A. Roberts, M. Tagliasacchi, M. Sharifi, N. Zeghidour, and C. H. Frank, “Musiclm: Generating music from text,” CoRR, vol. abs/2301.11325, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://doi.or...

    2023 doi arXiv

  7. [15]

    Simple and control- lable music generation,

    J. Copet, F. Kreuk, I. Gat, T. Remez, D. Kant, G. Syn- naeve, Y . Adi, and A. Défossez, “Simple and control- lable music generation,” in Advances in Neural Infor- mation Processing Systems 36: Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2023, NeurIPS 2023, New O...

    2023

  8. [16]

    Jukebox: A generative model for music,

    P. Dhariwal, H. Jun, C. Payne, J. W. Kim, A. Radford, and I. Sutskever, “Jukebox: A generative model for music,” CoRR, vol. abs/2005.00341, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2005.00341

    2005 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Yue: Scaling open foundation models for long- form music generation,

    R. Yuan, H. Lin, S. Guo, G. Zhang, J. Pan, Y . Zang, H. Liu, Y . Liang, W. Ma, X. Du, X. Du, Z. Ye, T. Zheng, Y . Ma, M. Liu, Z. Tian, Z. Zhou, L. Xue, X. Qu, Y . Li, S. Wu, T. Shen, Z. Ma, J. Zhan, C. Wang, Y . Wang, X. Chi, X. Zhang, Z. Yang, X. Wang, S. Liu, L. Mei, P. Li, ...

    2025

  10. [18]

    Whole-song hierarchical generation of symbolic music using cascaded diffusion models,

    Z. Wang, L. Min, and G. Xia, “Whole-song hierarchical generation of symbolic music using cascaded diffusion models,” in The Twelfth In- ternational Conference on Learning Representa- tions, ICLR 2024, Vienna, Austria, May 7-11,

    2024

  11. [19]

    [Online]

    OpenReview.net, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://openreview.net/forum?id=sn7CYWyavh

    2024

  12. [20]

    Chatmusician: Understanding and generating music intrinsically with LLM,

    R. Yuan, H. Lin, Y . Wang, Z. Tian, S. Wu, T. Shen, G. Zhang, Y . Wu, C. Liu, Z. Zhou, L. Xue, Z. Ma, Q. Liu, T. Zheng, Y . Li, Y . Ma, Y . Liang, X. Chi, R. Liu, Z. Wang, C. Lin, Q. Liu, T. Jiang, W. Huang, W. Chen, J. Fu, E. Benetos, G. Xia, R. B. Dannenberg, W. Xue, S. Kang...

    2024

  13. [21]

    A hierarchical latent vector model for learning long-term structure in music,

    A. Roberts, J. H. Engel, C. Raffel, C. Hawthorne, and D. Eck, “A hierarchical latent vector model for learning long-term structure in music,” in Proceedings of the 35th International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML 2018, Stockholmsmässan, Stockholm, Sweden, July 10-15, 20...

    2018

  14. [22]

    What is missing in deep music generation? A study of repetition and structure in popular music,

    S. Dai, H. Yu, and R. B. Dannenberg, “What is missing in deep music generation? A study of repetition and structure in popular music,” in Proceedings of the 23rd International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference, ISMIR 2022, Bengaluru, India, December 4-8, 2022 ...

    2022

  15. [23]

    Recombinant music: Using the computer to explore musical style,

    D. Cope, “Recombinant music: Using the computer to explore musical style,” Computer, vol. 24, no. 7, pp. 22–28, 1991. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10. 1109/2.84830

    1991

  16. [24]

    The effect of explicit structure encoding of deep neural networks for symbolic music generation,

    K. Chen, W. Zhang, S. Dubnov, G. Xia, and W. Li, “The effect of explicit structure encoding of deep neural networks for symbolic music generation,” in 2019 International Workshop on Multilayer Music Representation and Processing (MMRP) . IEEE, Jan. 2019, p. 77–84. [Online]. Av...

    2019

  17. [25]

    Sympac: Scalable symbolic music generation with prompts and constraints,

    H. Chen, J. B. L. Smith, J. Spijkervet, J. Wang, P. Zou, B. Li, Q. Kong, and X. Du, “Sympac: Scalable symbolic music generation with prompts and constraints,” in Proceedings of the 25th International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference, ISMIR 2024, San Francisco...

    2024

  18. [26]

    Sampling variations of sequences for structured music gen- eration,

    F. Pachet, A. Papadopoulos, and P. Roy, “Sampling variations of sequences for structured music gen- eration,” in Proceedings of the 18th International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference, ISMIR 2017, Suzhou, China, October 23-27, 2017 , S. J. Cunningham, Z. Duan...

    2017

  19. [27]

    Melons: Generating melody with long-term structure using transformers and structure graph,

    Y . Zou, P. Zou, Y . Zhao, K. Zhang, R. Zhang, and X. Wang, “Melons: Generating melody with long-term structure using transformers and structure graph,” in IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, ICASSP 2022, Virtual and Singapore, 23-27 May 2...

    2022

  20. [28]

    Composer’s Assistant: An Interactive Transformer for Multi-Track MIDI Infilling,

    M. Malandro, “Composer’s Assistant: An Interactive Transformer for Multi-Track MIDI Infilling,” in Proc. 24th Int. Society for Music Information Retrieval Conf., Milan, Italy, 2023, pp. 327–334

    2023

  21. [29]

    Composer’s Assistant 2: Interactive Multi- Track MIDI Infilling with Fine-Grained User Control,

    ——, “Composer’s Assistant 2: Interactive Multi- Track MIDI Infilling with Fine-Grained User Control,” in Proc. 25th Int. Society for Music Information Re- trieval Conf., San Francisco, CA, USA, 2024, pp. 438– 445

    2024

  22. [30]

    D. R. Hipp, “Sqlite,” 2004. [Online]. Available: https://www.sqlite.org

    2004

  23. [31]

    Mupt: A generative symbolic music pretrained transformer,

    X. Qu, Y . Bai, Y . Ma, Z. Zhou, K. M. Lo, J. Liu, R. Yuan, L. Min, X. Liu, T. Zhang, X. Du, S. Guo, Y . Liang, Y . Li, S. Wu, J. Zhou, T. Zheng, Z. Ma, F. Han, W. Xue, and et al., “Mupt: A generative symbolic music pretrained transformer,” in The Thirteenth International Conf...

    2025

  24. [32]

    Fréchet audio distance: A reference-free metric for evaluating music enhancement algorithms,

    K. Kilgour, M. Zuluaga, D. Roblek, and M. Sharifi, “Fréchet audio distance: A reference-free metric for evaluating music enhancement algorithms,” in 20th Annual Conference of the International Speech Com- munication Association, Interspeech 2019, Graz, Aus- tria, September 15-...

    2019 doi

  25. [33]

    The abc notation system,

    ABC Wiki, “The abc notation system,” 2021. [Online]. Available: https://abcwiki.org/abc:syntax

    2021

  26. [34]

    Llama: Open and efficient foundation language models,

    H. Touvron, T. Lavril, G. Izacard, X. Martinet, M.-A. Lachaux, T. Lacroix, B. Rozière, N. Goyal, E. Hambro, F. Azhar, A. Rodriguez, A. Joulin, E. Grave, and G. Lample, “Llama: Open and efficient foundation language models,” 2023. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.13971

    2023 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Musecoco: Generating symbolic music from text,

    P. Lu, X. Xu, C. Kang, B. Yu, C. Xing, X. Tan, and J. Bian, “Musecoco: Generating symbolic music from text,” 2023. [Online]. Available: https: //arxiv.org/abs/2306.00110

    2023 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Multitrack music trans- former,

    H.-W. Dong, K. Chen, S. Dubnov, J. McAuley, and T. Berg-Kirkpatrick, “Multitrack music trans- former,” in IEEE International Conference on Acous- tics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), 2023

    2023

  29. [37]

    Anticipatory music transformer,

    J. Thickstun, D. L. W. Hall, C. Donahue, and P. Liang, “Anticipatory music transformer,”Trans. Mach. Learn. Res., vol. 2024, 2024. [Online]. Available: https: //openreview.net/forum?id=EBNJ33Fcrl

    2024

  30. [38]

    Music understanding llama: Advancing text-to-music generation with question answering and captioning,

    S. Liu, A. S. Hussain, C. Sun, and Y . Shan, “Music understanding llama: Advancing text-to-music generation with question answering and captioning,” in IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, ICASSP 2024, Seoul, Republic of Korea, April 14-19,...

    2024

  31. [39]

    Audio flamingo: A novel audio language model with few-shot learning and dialogue abilities,

    Z. Kong, A. Goel, R. Badlani, W. Ping, R. Valle, and B. Catanzaro, “Audio flamingo: A novel audio language model with few-shot learning and dialogue abilities,” in Forty-first International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML 2024, Vienna, Austria, July 21-27, 2024. OpenRevie...

    2024

  32. [40]

    Gpt-4o system card,

    OpenAI (2024), “Gpt-4o system card,” CoRR, vol. abs/2410.21276, 2024. [Online]. Available: https: //doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2410.21276

    2024 doi arXiv

  33. [42]

    Adsr sample manager,

    ADSR, “Adsr sample manager,” n.d. [Online]. Avail- able: https://www.adsrsounds.com/product/software/ adsr-sample-manager/

  34. [44]

    Frechet audio distance in pytorch,

    H. H. Tan, “Frechet audio distance in pytorch,” https: //github.com/gudgud96/frechet-audio-distance, 2022

    2022

  35. [45]

    CNN architectures for large-scale audio classification,

    S. Hershey, S. Chaudhuri, D. P. W. Ellis, J. F. Gemmeke, A. Jansen, R. C. Moore, M. Plakal, D. Platt, R. A. Saurous, B. Seybold, M. Slaney, R. J. Weiss, and K. W. Wilson, “CNN architectures for large-scale audio classification,” in 2017 IEEE International Conference on Acousti...

    2017

  36. [46]

    Large-scale contrastive language-audio pretraining with feature fusion and keyword-to-caption augmentation,

    Y . Wu, K. Chen, T. Zhang, Y . Hui, T. Berg- Kirkpatrick, and S. Dubnov, “Large-scale contrastive language-audio pretraining with feature fusion and keyword-to-caption augmentation,” in IEEE Interna- tional Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing ICASSP 2023, Rho...

    2023

  37. [47]

    Minty fresh: Spotify makes a new home for edm,

    J. Joven, “Minty fresh: Spotify makes a new home for edm,” 2018. [On- line]. Available: https://hmc.chartmetric.com/ minty-fresh-spotify-makes-a-new-home-for-edm/

    2018

  38. [48]

    Cohen, Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd ed

    J. Cohen, Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1988

    1988

  39. [49]

    MERT: acoustic music understanding model with large-scale self-supervised training,

    Y . Li, R. Yuan, G. Zhang, Y . Ma, X. Chen, H. Yin, C. Xiao, C. Lin, A. Ragni, E. Benetos, N. Gyenge, R. B. Dannenberg, R. Liu, W. Chen, G. Xia, Y . Shi, W. Huang, Z. Wang, Y . Guo, and J. Fu, “MERT: acoustic music understanding model with large-scale self-supervised training,...

    2024

  40. [2024]

    Available: https://openreview.net/ forum?id=g8AigOTNXL

    [Online]. Available: https://openreview.net/ forum?id=g8AigOTNXL

  41. [2025]

    [Online]

    OpenReview.net, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://openreview.net/forum?id=iAK9oHp4Zz

    2025

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.