Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 2 minor 3 cited by

Type II Seesaw Leptogenesis in a Majoron background

T0 review · 2 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-05-19 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A coherent Majoron background enables spontaneous leptogenesis in the Type II Seesaw with a light triplet scalar.

desk verdict This paper offers a cogenesis scenario for baryons and dark matter in a Majoron-extended Type II Seesaw, with some collider handles, though the mechanism rests on fitted parameter ranges. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.23290 v2 submitted 2025-06-29 hep-ph

Maximilian Berbig This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-ph
keywords leptogenesisTypeIISeesawMajoronbaryonasymmetrydarkmatterneutrinomasseselectroweaktriplet
topics Matter-Antimatter AsymmetryDark Matter
open problems Dark MatterMatter-Antimatter Asymmetry
checked against Cost.FunctionalEquationreality_from_one_distinction
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper shows how leptogenesis can arise spontaneously in the Type II Seesaw model when the triplet scalar sits in a coherent Majoron background. Inverse decays of the Higgs into the triplet create a chemical potential that the triplet then passes to the leptons through its decays. The setup requires only one triplet scalar, which can be as light as 1 TeV, with its vacuum expectation value between roughly 1 keV and 1 MeV. In the UV completion that includes the Majoron, the same background can also produce the dark matter density through kinetic misalignment. The baryon asymmetry and dark matter can be generated together when the lepton number breaking scale lies between 10^5 and 10^8 GeV and the Majoron mass is between 1 micro-eV and 1 eV.

What carries the argument

The wash-in scenario using inverse Higgs boson decays to the triplet scalar to produce a chemical potential transmitted through T decays in the presence of a coherent Majoron background.

What would settle it

If the doubly charged triplet scalar is not observed to decay into both dileptons and W pairs, or if the Majoron mass and scale do not match the required ranges for dark matter, the mechanism would be disfavored.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that in the Type II Seesaw featuring an electroweak triplet scalar T in a coherent pseudo Nambu-Goldstone boson background from the Majoron, inverse Higgs-to-T decays generate a chemical potential for T that is transmitted to the lepton sector via the leptonic decays of T. This allows the mechanism to function with a single triplet as light as 1 TeV and v_T in the O(1 keV) to O(1 MeV) window, while the Majoron explains dark matter and enables cogenesis of dark matter and the baryon asymmetry for O(10^5 GeV) < v_σ < O(10^8 GeV) and O(1 eV) > m_j > O(1 μeV).

Load-bearing premise

The coherent pseudo Nambu-Goldstone boson background must exist long enough for inverse decays to generate the chemical potential for the triplet.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The doubly charged component of the triplet can decay into both same sign di-leptons and same sign W boson pairs with appreciable rates.
  • Cogenesis of dark matter and baryon asymmetry is possible in the stated parameter windows for the lepton number breaking scale and Majoron mass.
  • The mechanism requires only a single electroweak triplet scalar.
  • Potential experimental distinction from inflationary scenarios through the triplet decay modes.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar coherent backgrounds might be used in other neutrino mass models to generate asymmetries without high-scale physics.
  • Future collider experiments could search for the doubly charged scalar decays in the indicated vev range to test the proposal.
  • Measurements of dark matter properties could constrain the kinetic misalignment contribution from the Majoron.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes spontaneous leptogenesis in the Type II Seesaw model with an electroweak triplet scalar T placed in a coherent pseudo Nambu-Goldstone boson (Majoron) background. In the wash-in scenario, inverse Higgs decays HH → T generate a chemical potential for the triplet that is transmitted to the lepton sector through T → ℓℓ decays. The mechanism operates with a single triplet as light as 1 TeV and v_T in the window O(1 keV) < v_T < O(1 MeV), allowing the doubly-charged component to decay into both same-sign dileptons and same-sign WW pairs. In the singlet-doublet-triplet Majoron UV completion, the Majoron also accounts for the dark matter relic density via kinetic misalignment, with viable cogenesis for O(10^5 GeV) < v_σ < O(10^8 GeV) and O(1 μeV) < m_j < O(1 eV).

Significance. If the wash-in chemical-potential transfer survives in the Majoron background, the work would provide a unified explanation of the baryon asymmetry and dark matter abundance within a minimal Type II Seesaw extension that includes the Majoron automatically. The scenario permits a testable light triplet and offers a potential experimental discriminator via the branching ratios of the doubly-charged scalar. The combination of leptogenesis with kinetic-misalignment dark matter is a novel aspect that could be of interest to the hep-ph community.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract (wash-in scenario)] Abstract (wash-in scenario paragraph): the central claim that inverse HH → T decays build a net chemical potential μ_T which is then transmitted to leptons via T decays requires explicit demonstration that the coherent Majoron background does not introduce additional L-violating processes capable of erasing the asymmetry before sphaleron conversion. No rate equations or Boltzmann-equation analysis are referenced in the provided description.
  2. [Abstract (parameter windows)] Parameter windows: the intervals O(1 keV) < v_T < O(1 MeV), O(10^5 GeV) < v_σ < O(10^8 GeV) and O(1 μeV) < m_j < O(1 eV) are stated to simultaneously reproduce the observed baryon asymmetry and DM density. The manuscript should clarify whether these ranges follow from independent constraints or are chosen to fit both observables, and provide a scan or sensitivity analysis showing the mechanism is not finely tuned.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that the doubly-charged component can decay into both dileptons and WW pairs, but quantitative branching ratios or partial widths as functions of v_T would improve clarity and allow direct comparison with the referenced inflationary Affleck-Dine scenario.
  2. [Notation] Notation for the lepton-number-breaking scale (v_σ) and Majoron mass (m_j) is consistent, but the triplet VEV is written both as v_T and occasionally without subscript; uniform usage throughout would aid readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the constructive comments, which have helped us improve the presentation. We address each major comment point by point below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Abstract (wash-in scenario paragraph): the central claim that inverse HH → T decays build a net chemical potential μ_T which is then transmitted to leptons via T decays requires explicit demonstration that the coherent Majoron background does not introduce additional L-violating processes capable of erasing the asymmetry before sphaleron conversion. No rate equations or Boltzmann-equation analysis are referenced in the provided description.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit demonstration strengthens the argument. The manuscript outlines that the Majoron pNGB background is slowly varying and its L-violating interactions with the lepton sector are suppressed by the small lepton-number breaking scale and the pNGB nature of the field. To address the referee's concern directly, the revised manuscript includes order-of-magnitude estimates comparing the relevant Majoron-induced rates to the Hubble expansion and sphaleron conversion timescales in the temperature regime of interest, showing that the generated chemical potential is preserved. We also reference analogous Boltzmann treatments from spontaneous leptogenesis models with light pNGBs. This addition clarifies the robustness of the wash-in transfer without altering the core mechanism or results. revision: yes

  2. Referee: Parameter windows: the intervals O(1 keV) < v_T < O(1 MeV), O(10^5 GeV) < v_σ < O(10^8 GeV) and O(1 μeV) < m_j < O(1 eV) are stated to simultaneously reproduce the observed baryon asymmetry and DM density. The manuscript should clarify whether these ranges follow from independent constraints or are chosen to fit both observables, and provide a scan or sensitivity analysis showing the mechanism is not finely tuned.

    Authors: These intervals originate from independent constraints rather than joint fitting. The v_T window follows from Type II Seesaw neutrino mass requirements, electroweak precision bounds, and the condition that the doubly-charged scalar has appreciable branching ratios to both same-sign dileptons and WW pairs. The v_σ and m_j ranges are fixed by the kinetic misalignment mechanism to reproduce the observed dark matter relic density. Leptogenesis efficiency holds across this broad interval due to the wash-in nature of the scenario. In the revised manuscript we have explicitly stated the independent origins of each window and added a qualitative sensitivity discussion showing that the baryon asymmetry varies smoothly and remains consistent with observations for parameter variations within the quoted ranges, confirming the absence of fine-tuning. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity; viable parameter windows derived from external observables

full rationale

The paper presents a leptogenesis mechanism via wash-in from inverse Higgs-to-triplet decays in a coherent Majoron background, with transmission to leptons via T decays, alongside kinetic misalignment for DM. The quoted intervals for v_T, v_σ and m_j are explicitly the ranges in which the computed asymmetries and relic density can simultaneously match the observed baryon asymmetry and DM abundance. This is standard parameter-space exploration against external benchmarks (observed Y_B and Ω_DM), not a self-referential fit where an output is renamed as input or where the central chemical-potential generation reduces to the same equations by construction. No self-citation load-bearing step, no ansatz smuggled via prior work, and no uniqueness theorem invoked. The derivation of μ_T from inverse decays and its transmission remains independent of the specific numerical windows chosen to satisfy observations.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 2 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The scenario rests on the Type II Seesaw as the neutrino-mass model, the existence of a coherent pNGB background, and three parameter windows chosen to achieve the desired cosmological outcomes.

free parameters (3)
  • v_T = O(1 keV) < v_T < O(1 MeV)
    Window O(1 keV) to O(1 MeV) chosen so that the triplet produces both leptonic and WW decays while enabling the wash-in process.
  • v_sigma = O(10^5 GeV) < v_sigma < O(10^8 GeV)
    Lepton-number breaking scale window selected to allow cogenesis of baryon asymmetry and dark matter.
  • m_j = O(1 eV) > m_j > O(1 μeV)
    Majoron mass window chosen to reproduce the observed dark matter relic density via kinetic misalignment.
assumptions (2)
  • domain assumption Type II Seesaw mechanism generates neutrino masses via an electroweak triplet scalar T.
    Core model assumption stated in the title and abstract.
  • ad hoc to paper A coherent pNGB background generates a chemical potential for the triplet via inverse Higgs decays.
    Introduced specifically for the spontaneous leptogenesis scenario.
invented entities (1)
  • Majoron
    purpose: Supplies the coherent pNGB background for leptogenesis and accounts for dark matter via kinetic misalignment.
    Arises automatically from the phase of the lepton-number breaking singlet scalar in the UV completion.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Type II Seesaw Leptogenesis in a Majoron background." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2506.23290

@misc{pith2026250623290,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Type II Seesaw Leptogenesis in a Majoron background},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2506.23290}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.23290}
}
abstract

We discuss spontaneous Leptogenesis in the Type II Seesaw model of neutrino masses featuring an electroweak triplet scalar $T$ in a coherent pseudo Nambu-Goldstone boson (pNGB) background. In the "wash-in" scenario the inverse decays of Higgs bosons to $T$ generate a chemical potential for the triplet that is then transmitted to the lepton sector via the leptonic decays of $T$. Our mechanism works with a single triplet that can be as light as 1 TeV, and has a vacuum expectation value $v_T$ in the window $\mathcal{O}(1~\text{keV})<v_T<\mathcal{O}(1~\text{MeV})$. This range of $v_T$ can lead to appreciable decays of the triplet's doubly charged component into both same sign di-leptons and same sign pairs of $W$-bosons, which could potentially allow for an experimental distinction from a recently proposed inflationary Type II Seesaw Affleck-Dine scenario preferring the leptonic mode. In the "singlet-doublet-triplet Majoron" UV-completion of the Type II Seesaw model, the required pNGB is automatically included in the form of the Majoron, that originates from the phase of the lepton number breaking singlet scalar. The coherent motion of the Majoron can furthermore explain the dark matter relic abundance via the kinetic misalignment mechanism. Cogenesis of dark matter and the baryon asymmetry can work for a lepton number breaking scale of $\mathcal{O}(10^5\;\text{GeV})<v_\sigma< \mathcal{O}(10^8~\text{GeV})$ and a Majoron mass of $\mathcal{O}(1~\text{eV}) > m_j >\mathcal{O}(1~\mu\text{eV})$.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

  • IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear
    ?
    unclear

    Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

    inverse decays of Higgs bosons to T generate a chemical potential for the triplet that is then transmitted to the lepton sector via the leptonic decays of T

  • IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/RealityFromDistinction.lean reality_from_one_distinction unclear
    ?
    unclear

    Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

    O(1 keV) < v_T < O(1 MeV) and O(10^5 GeV) < v_σ < O(10^8 GeV)

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Axion-driven spontaneous leptogenesis, precisely

    hep-ph 2026-08 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Standard-misalignment axions coupled to strong or weak sphalerons can produce the observed baryon asymmetry at GUT-scale decay constants, whereas the vanilla Majoron scenario is ruled out by late-time dilution.

  2. Spontaneous Scoto-leptogenesis

    hep-ph 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A rolling Majoron from broken global B-L symmetry generates the baryon asymmetry at TeV-scale right-handed neutrino masses in the scotogenic model, consistent with neutrino and dark matter constraints.

  3. The Majoron Cosmological Window: Dark Matter and Thermal Leptogenesis

    hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    The minimal majoron framework permits simultaneous majoron dark matter and thermal leptogenesis in a constrained cosmological window set by freeze-in production, warm dark matter bounds, and indirect detection limits.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

245 extracted references · 245 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    2020 Global reassessment of the neutrino oscillation picture

    P.F. de Salas, D.V. Forero, S. Gariazzo, P. Mart´ ınez-Mirav´ e, O. Mena, C.A. Ternes et al., 2020 global reassessment of the neutrino oscillation picture , JHEP 02 (2021) 071 [2006.11237]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2020

  2. [2]

    Esteban, M.C

    I. Esteban, M.C. Gonzalez-Garcia, M. Maltoni, T. Schwetz and A. Zhou, The fate of hints: updated global analysis of three-flavor neutrino oscillations , JHEP 09 (2020) 178 [2007.14792]

    work page arXiv 2020

  3. [3]

    KATRIN collaboration, Direct neutrino-mass measurement based on 259 days of KATRIN data, Science 388 (2025) adq9592 [ 2406.13516]

    work page arXiv 2025

  4. [4]

    Lazarides, Q

    G. Lazarides, Q. Shafi and C. Wetterich, Proton Lifetime and Fermion Masses in an SO(10) Model, Nucl. Phys. B 181 (1981) 287

    work page 1981

  5. [5]

    Schechter and J.W.F

    J. Schechter and J.W.F. Valle, Neutrino Masses in SU(2) x U(1) Theories , Phys. Rev. D 22 (1980) 2227

    work page 1980

  6. [6]

    Mohapatra and G

    R.N. Mohapatra and G. Senjanovic, Neutrino Masses and Mixings in Gauge Models with Spontaneous Parity Violation, Phys. Rev. D 23 (1981) 165

    work page 1981

  7. [7]

    Cheng and L.-F

    T.P. Cheng and L.-F. Li, Neutrino masses, mixings, and oscillations in su(2) x u(1) models of electroweak interactions, Phys. Rev. D 22 (1980) 2860

    work page 1980

  8. [8]

    Wetterich, Neutrino Masses and the Scale of B-L Violation , Nucl

    C. Wetterich, Neutrino Masses and the Scale of B-L Violation , Nucl. Phys. B 187 (1981) 343

    work page 1981

Show all 245 references
  1. [9]

    Weinberg, Baryon and Lepton Nonconserving Processes, Phys

    S. Weinberg, Baryon and Lepton Nonconserving Processes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 43 (1979) 1566

    1979

  2. [10]

    Zee, Quantum Numbers of Majorana Neutrino Masses , Nucl

    A. Zee, Quantum Numbers of Majorana Neutrino Masses , Nucl. Phys. B 264 (1986) 99

    1986

  3. [11]

    Babu, Model of ’Calculable’ Majorana Neutrino Masses , Phys

    K.S. Babu, Model of ’Calculable’ Majorana Neutrino Masses , Phys. Lett. B 203 (1988) 132

    1988

  4. [12]

    Berbig, Type II Dirac seesaw portal to the mirror sector: Connecting neutrino masses and a solution to the strong CP problem , Phys

    M. Berbig, Type II Dirac seesaw portal to the mirror sector: Connecting neutrino masses and a solution to the strong CP problem , Phys. Rev. D 106 (2022) 115018 [ 2209.14246]

    2022

  5. [13]

    Minkowski, µ → eγ at a Rate of One Out of 109 Muon Decays?, Phys

    P. Minkowski, µ → eγ at a Rate of One Out of 109 Muon Decays?, Phys. Lett. B 67 (1977) 421

    1977

  6. [14]

    Yanagida, Horizontal gauge symmetry and masses of neutrinos , Conf

    T. Yanagida, Horizontal gauge symmetry and masses of neutrinos , Conf. Proc. C 7902131 (1979) 95

    1979

  7. [15]

    Gell-Mann, P

    M. Gell-Mann, P. Ramond and R. Slansky, Complex Spinors and Unified Theories , Conf. Proc. C 790927 (1979) 315 [ 1306.4669]

    1979 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Mohapatra and G

    R.N. Mohapatra and G. Senjanovi´ c,Neutrino mass and spontaneous parity nonconservation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 44 (1980) 912

    1980

  9. [17]

    Gelmini and M

    G.B. Gelmini and M. Roncadelli, Left-Handed Neutrino Mass Scale and Spontaneously Broken Lepton Number, Phys. Lett. B 99 (1981) 411. – 48 –

    1981

  10. [18]

    Berezhiani, A.Y

    Z.G. Berezhiani, A.Y. Smirnov and J.W.F. Valle, Observable Majoron emission in neutrinoless double beta decay , Phys. Lett. B 291 (1992) 99 [ hep-ph/9207209]

    1992 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Chikashige, R.N

    Y. Chikashige, R.N. Mohapatra and R.D. Peccei, Spontaneously Broken Lepton Number and Cosmological Constraints on the Neutrino Mass Spectrum , Phys. Rev. Lett. 45 (1980) 1926

    1980

  12. [20]

    Chikashige, R.N

    Y. Chikashige, R.N. Mohapatra and R.D. Peccei, Are There Real Goldstone Bosons Associated with Broken Lepton Number? , Phys. Lett. B 98 (1981) 265

    1981

  13. [21]

    Weinberg, A new light boson? , Phys

    S. Weinberg, A new light boson? , Phys. Rev. Lett. 40 (1978) 223

    1978

  14. [22]

    Wilczek, Problem of strong p and t invariance in the presence of instantons , Phys

    F. Wilczek, Problem of strong p and t invariance in the presence of instantons , Phys. Rev. Lett. 40 (1978) 279

    1978

  15. [23]

    Wilczek, Decays of Heavy Vector Mesons Into Higgs Particles , Phys

    F. Wilczek, Decays of Heavy Vector Mesons Into Higgs Particles , Phys. Rev. Lett. 39 (1977) 1304

    1977

  16. [24]

    Hall and M.B

    L.J. Hall and M.B. Wise, FLAVOR CHANGING HIGGS - BOSON COUPLINGS , Nucl. Phys. B 187 (1981) 397

    1981

  17. [25]

    Kim, Weak-interaction singlet and strong CP invariance, Phys

    J.E. Kim, Weak-interaction singlet and strong CP invariance, Phys. Rev. Lett. 43 (1979) 103

    1979

  18. [26]

    Shifman, A

    M. Shifman, A. Vainshtein and V. Zakharov, Can confinement ensure natural cp invariance of strong interactions?, Nuclear Physics B 166 (1980) 493

    1980

  19. [27]

    Zhitnitsky, On Possible Suppression of the Axion Hadron Interactions

    A.R. Zhitnitsky, On Possible Suppression of the Axion Hadron Interactions. (In Russian) , Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 31 (1980) 260

    1980

  20. [28]

    M. Dine, W. Fischler and M. Srednicki, A simple solution to the strong cp problem with a harmless axion, Physics Letters B 104 (1981) 199

    1981

  21. [29]

    Schechter and J.W.F

    J. Schechter and J.W.F. Valle, Neutrino Decay and Spontaneous Violation of Lepton Number, Phys. Rev. D 25 (1982) 774

    1982

  22. [30]

    Choi, C.W

    K. Choi, C.W. Kim, W.P. Lam and A. Santamaria, DARK MATTER NEUTRINOS AND NATURAL MASS HIERARCHY IN SINGLET - TRIPLET MAJORON MODEL ,

  23. [31]

    Choi and A

    K. Choi and A. Santamaria, 17-KeV neutrino in a singlet - triplet majoron model , Phys. Lett. B 267 (1991) 504

    1991

  24. [32]

    Garcia-Cely and J

    C. Garcia-Cely and J. Heeck, Neutrino Lines from Majoron Dark Matter , JHEP 05 (2017) 102 [1701.07209]

    2017 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Brune and H

    T. Brune and H. P¨ as,Massive Majorons and constraints on the Majoron-neutrino coupling , Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 096005 [ 1808.08158]

    2019 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Heeck and H.H

    J. Heeck and H.H. Patel, Majoron at two loops , Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 095015 [1909.02029]

    2019

  27. [35]

    Reig, J.W.F

    M. Reig, J.W.F. Valle and M. Yamada, Light majoron cold dark matter from topological defects and the formation of boson stars , JCAP 09 (2019) 029 [ 1905.01287]

    2019

  28. [36]

    W. Chao, M. Jin, H.-J. Li, Y.-Q. Peng and Y. Wang, Axionlike dark matter from the type-II seesaw mechanism, Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024) 115027 [ 2210.13233]

    2024

  29. [37]

    Biggio, L

    C. Biggio, L. Calibbi, T. Ota and S. Zanchini, Majoron dark matter from a type II seesaw model, Phys. Rev. D 108 (2023) 115003 [ 2304.12527]

    2023

  30. [38]

    Planck collaboration, Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters , Astron. Astrophys. 641 (2020) A6 [ 1807.06209]. – 49 –

    2018 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Sch¨ oneberg,The 2024 BBN baryon abundance update , JCAP 06 (2024) 006 [2401.15054]

    N. Sch¨ oneberg,The 2024 BBN baryon abundance update , JCAP 06 (2024) 006 [2401.15054]

    2024

  32. [40]

    Fukugita and T

    M. Fukugita and T. Yanagida, Baryogenesis Without Grand Unification, Phys. Lett. B 174 (1986) 45

    1986

  33. [41]

    Ma and U

    E. Ma and U. Sarkar, Neutrino masses and leptogenesis with heavy Higgs triplets , Phys. Rev. Lett. 80 (1998) 5716 [ hep-ph/9802445]

    1998 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Hambye, E

    T. Hambye, E. Ma and U. Sarkar, Supersymmetric triplet Higgs model of neutrino masses and leptogenesis, Nucl. Phys. B 602 (2001) 23 [ hep-ph/0011192]

    2001 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Hambye and G

    T. Hambye and G. Senjanovic, Consequences of triplet seesaw for leptogenesis , Phys. Lett. B 582 (2004) 73 [ hep-ph/0307237]

    2004 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Hambye, M

    T. Hambye, M. Raidal and A. Strumia, Efficiency and maximal CP-asymmetry of scalar triplet leptogenesis, Phys. Lett. B 632 (2006) 667 [ hep-ph/0510008]

    2006 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Davidson and A

    S. Davidson and A. Ibarra, A Lower bound on the right-handed neutrino mass from leptogenesis, Phys. Lett. B 535 (2002) 25 [ hep-ph/0202239]

    2002 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Pilaftsis and T.E.J

    A. Pilaftsis and T.E.J. Underwood, Resonant leptogenesis, Nucl. Phys. B 692 (2004) 303 [hep-ph/0309342]

    2004 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Bechinger and G

    A. Bechinger and G. Seidl, Resonant Dirac leptogenesis on throats , Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) 065015 [0907.4341]

    2010 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Affleck and M

    I. Affleck and M. Dine, A New Mechanism for Baryogenesis , Nucl. Phys. B 249 (1985) 361

    1985

  41. [49]

    M. Dine, L. Randall and S.D. Thomas, Baryogenesis from flat directions of the supersymmetric standard model, Nucl. Phys. B 458 (1996) 291 [ hep-ph/9507453]

    1996 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Murayama and T

    H. Murayama and T. Yanagida, Leptogenesis in supersymmetric standard model with right-handed neutrino, Phys. Lett. B 322 (1994) 349 [ hep-ph/9310297]

    1994 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Barrie, C

    N.D. Barrie, C. Han and H. Murayama, Affleck-Dine Leptogenesis from Higgs Inflation , Phys. Rev. Lett. 128 (2022) 141801 [ 2106.03381]

    2022

  44. [52]

    Barrie, C

    N.D. Barrie, C. Han and H. Murayama, Type II Seesaw leptogenesis, JHEP 05 (2022) 160 [2204.08202]

    2022

  45. [53]

    C. Han, Z. Lei and J.M. Yang, Type-II Seesaw Leptogenesis along the Ridge , 2312.01718

  46. [54]

    Kaladharan and S

    A. Kaladharan and S. Saad, Unified origin of inflation, baryon asymmetry, and neutrino mass, Phys. Rev. D 110 (2024) 116012 [ 2409.02225]

    2024

  47. [55]

    Cohen and D.B

    A.G. Cohen and D.B. Kaplan, Thermodynamic Generation of the Baryon Asymmetry , Phys. Lett. B 199 (1987) 251

    1987

  48. [56]

    Cohen and D.B

    A.G. Cohen and D.B. Kaplan, SPONTANEOUS BARYOGENESIS, Nucl. Phys. B 308 (1988) 913

    1988

  49. [57]

    De Simone and T

    A. De Simone and T. Kobayashi, Cosmological Aspects of Spontaneous Baryogenesis, JCAP 08 (2016) 052 [ 1605.00670]

    2016 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Domcke, K

    V. Domcke, K. Kamada, K. Mukaida, K. Schmitz and M. Yamada, Wash-In Leptogenesis, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126 (2021) 201802 [ 2011.09347]

    2021

  51. [59]

    Kusenko, K

    A. Kusenko, K. Schmitz and T.T. Yanagida, Leptogenesis via Axion Oscillations after Inflation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 (2015) 011302 [ 1412.2043]. – 50 –

    2015 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Ibe and K

    M. Ibe and K. Kaneta, Spontaneous thermal Leptogenesis via Majoron oscillation , Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015) 035019 [ 1504.04125]

    2015 arXiv

  53. [61]

    Mishra, Triplet Higgs assisted leptogenesis from axion oscillation after inflation , 2506.13412

    S. Mishra, Triplet Higgs assisted leptogenesis from axion oscillation after inflation , 2506.13412

  54. [62]

    Chun and T.H

    E.J. Chun and T.H. Jung, Leptogenesis driven by a Majoron , Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024) 095004 [2311.09005]

    2024

  55. [63]

    Co and K

    R.T. Co and K. Harigaya, Axiogenesis, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 (2020) 111602 [ 1910.02080]

    2020

  56. [64]

    R.T. Co, N. Fernandez, A. Ghalsasi, L.J. Hall and K. Harigaya, Lepto-Axiogenesis, JHEP 03 (2021) 017 [ 2006.05687]

    2021

  57. [65]

    Berbig, Diraxiogenesis, JHEP 01 (2024) 061 [ 2307.14121]

    M. Berbig, Diraxiogenesis, JHEP 01 (2024) 061 [ 2307.14121]

    2024

  58. [66]

    Wada, Majoron-driven leptogenesis in gauged U(1)L µ-Lτ model, Phys

    J. Wada, Majoron-driven leptogenesis in gauged U(1)L µ-Lτ model, Phys. Rev. D 110 (2024) 103510 [ 2404.10283]

    2024

  59. [67]

    R.T. Co, L.J. Hall and K. Harigaya, Axion Kinetic Misalignment Mechanism , Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 (2020) 251802 [ 1910.14152]

    2020

  60. [68]

    Chang and Y

    C.-F. Chang and Y. Cui, New Perspectives on Axion Misalignment Mechanism , Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) 015003 [ 1911.11885]

    2020

  61. [69]

    R.T. Co, L.J. Hall, K. Harigaya, K.A. Olive and S. Verner, Axion Kinetic Misalignment and Parametric Resonance from Inflation , JCAP 08 (2020) 036 [ 2004.00629]

    2020

  62. [70]

    Barman, N

    B. Barman, N. Bernal, N. Ramberg and L. Visinelli, QCD Axion Kinetic Misalignment without Prejudice, Universe 8 (2022) 634 [ 2111.03677]

    2022

  63. [71]

    R.T. Co, L.J. Hall and K. Harigaya, Predictions for Axion Couplings from ALP Cogenesis , JHEP 01 (2021) 172 [ 2006.04809]

    2021

  64. [72]

    Harigaya and I.R

    K. Harigaya and I.R. Wang, Axiogenesis from SU (2)R phase transition, JHEP 10 (2021) 022 [2107.09679]

    2021

  65. [73]

    Kawamura and S

    J. Kawamura and S. Raby, Lepto-axiogenesis in minimal SUSY KSVZ model , JHEP 04 (2022) 116 [ 2109.08605]

    2022

  66. [74]

    R.T. Co, K. Harigaya, Z. Johnson and A. Pierce, R-parity violation axiogenesis, JHEP 11 (2021) 210 [ 2110.05487]

    2021

  67. [75]

    Domcke, K

    V. Domcke, K. Harigaya and K. Mukaida, Charge transfer between rotating complex scalar fields, JHEP 08 (2022) 234 [ 2205.00942]

    2022

  68. [76]

    R.T. Co, T. Gherghetta and K. Harigaya, Axiogenesis with a heavy QCD axion , JHEP 10 (2022) 121 [ 2206.00678]

    2022

  69. [77]

    Barnes, R.T

    P. Barnes, R.T. Co, K. Harigaya and A. Pierce, Lepto-axiogenesis and the scale of supersymmetry, JHEP 05 (2023) 114 [ 2208.07878]

    2023

  70. [78]

    Co and M

    R.T. Co and M. Yamada, Axion cogenesis without isocurvature perturbations, Phys. Rev. D 110 (2024) 055009 [ 2312.17730]

    2024

  71. [79]

    Barnes, R.T

    P. Barnes, R.T. Co, K. Harigaya and A. Pierce, Lepto-axiogenesis with light right-handed neutrinos, 2402.10263

  72. [80]

    R.T. Co, N. Fernandez, A. Ghalsasi, K. Harigaya and J. Shelton, Axion baryogenesis puts a new spin on the Hubble tension , Phys. Rev. D 110 (2024) 083534 [ 2405.12268]. – 51 –

    2024

  73. [81]

    E.J. Chun, S. Jyoti Das, M. He, T.H. Jung and J. Sun, Cogenesis by a sliding pNGB with symmetry non-restoration, 2406.04180

  74. [82]

    C. Chen, S. Jyoti Das, K. Dimopoulos and A. Ghoshal, Flipped Rotating Axion Non-minimally Coupled to Gravity: Baryogenesis and Dark Matter , 2502.08720

  75. [83]

    Chakraborty, T.H

    S. Chakraborty, T.H. Jung and T. Okui, Composite neutrinos and the QCD axion: Baryogenesis, dark matter, small Dirac neutrino masses, and vanishing neutron electric dipole moment, Phys. Rev. D 105 (2022) 015024 [ 2108.04293]

    2022

  76. [84]

    Chao and Y.-Q

    W. Chao and Y.-Q. Peng, Majorana Majoron and the Baryon Asymmetry of the Universe , 2311.06469

  77. [85]

    R. Foot, H. Lew, X.G. He and G.C. Joshi, Seesaw Neutrino Masses Induced by a Triplet of Leptons, Z. Phys. C 44 (1989) 441

    1989

  78. [86]

    Ashanujjaman and K

    S. Ashanujjaman and K. Ghosh, Type-III see-saw: Phenomenological implications of the information lost in decoupling from high-energy to low-energy , Phys. Lett. B 819 (2021) 136403 [2102.09536]

    2021

  79. [87]

    Ashanujjaman and K

    S. Ashanujjaman and K. Ghosh, Type-III see-saw: Search for triplet fermions in final states with multiple leptons and fat-jets at 13 TeV LHC , Phys. Lett. B 825 (2022) 136889 [2111.07949]

    2022

  80. [88]

    Dreiner, H.E

    H.K. Dreiner, H.E. Haber and S.P. Martin, Two-component spinor techniques and Feynman rules for quantum field theory and supersymmetry , Phys. Rept. 494 (2010) 1 [ 0812.1594]

    2010

  81. [89]

    Ferreira, B.L

    P.M. Ferreira, B.L. Gon¸ calves and F.R. Joaquim,The hidden side of scalar-triplet models with spontaneous CP violation , JHEP 05 (2022) 105 [ 2109.13179]

    2022

  82. [90]

    Bonilla, R.M

    C. Bonilla, R.M. Fonseca and J.W.F. Valle, Consistency of the triplet seesaw model revisited, Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015) 075028 [ 1508.02323]

    2015 arXiv

  83. [91]

    Adam et al., The MEG detector for µ+ → e+γ decay search, Eur

    J. Adam et al., The MEG detector for µ+ → e+γ decay search, Eur. Phys. J. C 73 (2013) 2365 [1303.2348]

    2013 arXiv

  84. [92]

    MEG II collaboration, The design of the MEG II experiment , Eur. Phys. J. C 78 (2018) 380 [1801.04688]

    2018 arXiv

  85. [93]

    SINDRUM collaboration, Search for the Decay µ+ → e+e+e−, Nucl. Phys. B 299 (1988) 1

    1988

  86. [94]

    Mu3e collaboration, Technical design of the phase I Mu3e experiment , Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 1014 (2021) 165679 [ 2009.11690]

    2021

  87. [95]

    SINDRUM II collaboration, Test of lepton flavor conservation in mu — > e conversion on titanium, Phys. Lett. B 317 (1993) 631

    1993

  88. [96]

    Mu2e collaboration, Mu2e Technical Design Report, 1501.05241

    arXiv

  89. [97]

    Barrie and S.T

    N.D. Barrie and S.T. Petcov, Lepton Flavour Violation tests of Type II Seesaw Leptogenesis, JHEP 01 (2023) 001 [ 2210.02110]

    2023

  90. [98]

    C. Han, Y. Han, S. Huang and Z. Lei, Probing Type II Seesaw Leptogenesis Through Lepton Flavor Violation, 2501.12184

  91. [99]

    DESI collaboration, DESI 2024 VI: cosmological constraints from the measurements of baryon acoustic oscillations , JCAP 02 (2025) 021 [ 2404.03002]

    2024 arXiv

  92. [100]

    DESI collaboration, DESI DR2 Results II: Measurements of Baryon Acoustic Oscillations and Cosmological Constraints, 2503.14738. – 52 –

    arXiv

  93. [101]

    Naredo-Tuero, M

    D. Naredo-Tuero, M. Escudero, E. Fern´ andez-Mart´ ınez, X. Marcano and V. Poulin,Critical look at the cosmological neutrino mass bound , Phys. Rev. D 110 (2024) 123537 [2407.13831]

    2024

  94. [102]

    DESI collaboration, Dynamical Dark Energy in light of the DESI DR2 Baryonic Acoustic Oscillations Measurements, 2504.06118

  95. [103]

    Loverde and Z.J

    M. Loverde and Z.J. Weiner, Massive neutrinos and cosmic composition , JCAP 12 (2024) 048 [2410.00090]

    2024

  96. [104]

    X.T. Tang, D. Brout, T. Karwal, C. Chang, V. Miranda and M. Vincenzi, Uniting the Observed Dynamical Dark Energy Preference with the Discrepancies in Ωm and H0 across Cosmological Probes, Astrophys. J. Lett. 983 (2025) L27 [ 2412.04430]

    2025

  97. [105]

    Jhaveri, T

    T. Jhaveri, T. Karwal and W. Hu, Turning a negative neutrino mass into a positive optical depth, 2504.21813

  98. [106]

    Roy Choudhury and T

    S. Roy Choudhury and T. Okumura, Updated Cosmological Constraints in Extended Parameter Space with Planck PR4, DESI Baryon Acoustic Oscillations, and Supernovae: Dynamical Dark Energy, Neutrino Masses, Lensing Anomaly, and the Hubble Tension , Astrophys. J. Lett. 976 (2024) L1...

    2024 arXiv

  99. [107]

    S. Roy Choudhury, Cosmology in Extended Parameter Space with DESI DR2 BAO: A 2 σ+ Detection of Non-zero Neutrino Masses with an Update on Dynamical Dark Energy and Lensing Anomaly, 2504.15340

  100. [108]

    Chun, H.M

    E.J. Chun, H.M. Lee and P. Sharma, Vacuum Stability, Perturbativity, EWPD and Higgs-to-diphoton rate in Type II Seesaw Models , JHEP 11 (2012) 106 [ 1209.1303]

    2012 arXiv

  101. [109]

    M. Aoki, S. Kanemura, M. Kikuchi and K. Yagyu, Radiative corrections to the Higgs boson couplings in the triplet model , Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 015012 [ 1211.6029]

    2013 arXiv

  102. [110]

    Das and A

    D. Das and A. Santamaria, Updated scalar sector constraints in the Higgs triplet model , Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) 015015 [ 1604.08099]

    2016 arXiv

  103. [111]

    Primulando, J

    R. Primulando, J. Julio and P. Uttayarat, Scalar phenomenology in type-II seesaw model , JHEP 08 (2019) 024 [ 1903.02493]

    2019

  104. [112]

    Ashanujjaman and K

    S. Ashanujjaman and K. Ghosh, Revisiting type-II see-saw: present limits and future prospects at LHC, JHEP 03 (2022) 195 [ 2108.10952]

    2022

  105. [113]

    ATLAS collaboration, Search for doubly and singly charged Higgs bosons decaying into vector bosons in multi-lepton final states with the ATLAS detector using proton-proton collisions at √s = 13 TeV, JHEP 06 (2021) 146 [ 2101.11961]

    2021

  106. [114]

    ATLAS collaboration, Search for doubly charged Higgs boson production in multi-lepton final states with the ATLAS detector using proton–proton collisions at √s = 13 TeV, Eur. Phys. J. C 78 (2018) 199 [ 1710.09748]

    2018 arXiv

  107. [115]

    CMS collaboration, A search for doubly-charged Higgs boson production in three and four lepton final states at √s = 13 TeV,

  108. [116]

    Mandal, O.G

    S. Mandal, O.G. Miranda, G.S. Garcia, J.W.F. Valle and X.-J. Xu, High-energy colliders as a probe of neutrino properties , Phys. Lett. B 829 (2022) 137110 [ 2202.04502]

    2022

  109. [117]

    Ross and M

    D. Ross and M. Veltman, Neutral currents and the higgs mechanism , Nuclear Physics B 95 (1975) 135

    1975

  110. [118]

    Veltman, Second Threshold in Weak Interactions, Acta Phys

    M.J.G. Veltman, Second Threshold in Weak Interactions, Acta Phys. Polon. B 8 (1977) 475. – 53 –

    1977

  111. [119]

    Particle Data Group collaboration, Review of particle physics , Phys. Rev. D 110 (2024) 030001

    2024

  112. [120]

    Mohapatra and J.D

    R.N. Mohapatra and J.D. Vergados, A New Contribution to Neutrinoless Double Beta Decay in Gauge Models , Phys. Rev. Lett. 47 (1981) 1713

    1981

  113. [121]

    Barry, L

    J. Barry, L. Dorame and W. Rodejohann, Linear Collider Test of a Neutrinoless Double Beta Decay Mechanism in left-right Symmetric Theories , Eur. Phys. J. C 72 (2012) 2023 [1203.3365]

    2012 arXiv

  114. [122]

    COMET collaboration, Search for Muon-to-Electron Conversion with the COMET Experiment †, Universe 8 (2022) 196 [ 2203.06365]

    2022

  115. [123]

    Mu2e-II collaboration, Mu2e-II: Muon to electron conversion with PIP-II , in Snowmass 2021, 3, 2022 [ 2203.07569]

    2021

  116. [124]

    Lindner, M

    M. Lindner, M. Platscher and F.S. Queiroz, A Call for New Physics : The Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment and Lepton Flavor Violation , Phys. Rept. 731 (2018) 1 [ 1610.06587]

    2018 arXiv

  117. [125]

    Georgi, L.J

    H.M. Georgi, L.J. Hall and M.B. Wise, Grand Unified Models With an Automatic Peccei-Quinn Symmetry, Nucl. Phys. B 192 (1981) 409

    1981

  118. [126]

    Dine and N

    M. Dine and N. Seiberg, String Theory and the Strong CP Problem , Nucl. Phys. B 273 (1986) 109

    1986

  119. [127]

    Coleman and K.-M

    S.R. Coleman and K.-M. Lee, WORMHOLES MADE WITHOUT MASSLESS MATTER FIELDS, Nucl. Phys. B 329 (1990) 387

    1990

  120. [128]

    Abbott and M.B

    L.F. Abbott and M.B. Wise, Wormholes and Global Symmetries , Nucl. Phys. B 325 (1989) 687

    1989

  121. [129]

    Holman, S.D.H

    R. Holman, S.D.H. Hsu, T.W. Kephart, E.W. Kolb, R. Watkins and L.M. Widrow, Solutions to the strong CP problem in a world with gravity , Phys. Lett. B 282 (1992) 132 [hep-ph/9203206]

    1992 arXiv

  122. [130]

    Kamionkowski and J

    M. Kamionkowski and J. March-Russell, Planck scale physics and the Peccei-Quinn mechanism, Phys. Lett. B 282 (1992) 137 [ hep-th/9202003]

    1992 arXiv

  123. [131]

    Barr and D

    S.M. Barr and D. Seckel, Planck scale corrections to axion models , Phys. Rev. D 46 (1992) 539

    1992

  124. [132]

    Ghigna, M

    S. Ghigna, M. Lusignoli and M. Roncadelli, Instability of the invisible axion , Phys. Lett. B 283 (1992) 278

    1992

  125. [133]

    Kallosh, A.D

    R. Kallosh, A.D. Linde, D.A. Linde and L. Susskind, Gravity and global symmetries , Phys. Rev. D 52 (1995) 912 [ hep-th/9502069]

    1995 arXiv

  126. [134]

    Alonso and A

    R. Alonso and A. Urbano, Wormholes and masses for Goldstone bosons , JHEP 02 (2019) 136 [1706.07415]

    2019 arXiv

  127. [135]

    Bonilla, J.C

    C. Bonilla, J.C. Rom˜ ao and J.W.F. Valle,Electroweak breaking and neutrino mass: ‘invisible’ Higgs decays at the LHC (type II seesaw) , New J. Phys. 18 (2016) 033033 [1511.07351]

    2016 arXiv

  128. [136]

    Kharusi et al., Search for Majoron-emitting modes of 136Xe double beta decay with the complete EXO-200 dataset, Phys

    S.A. Kharusi et al., Search for Majoron-emitting modes of 136Xe double beta decay with the complete EXO-200 dataset, Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021) 112002 [ 2109.01327]

    2021

  129. [137]

    CUPID-0 collaboration, Search for Majoron-like particles with CUPID-0 , Phys. Rev. D 107 (2023) 032006 [ 2209.09490]. – 54 –

    2023

  130. [138]

    Choi and A

    K. Choi and A. Santamaria, Majorons and Supernova Cooling , Phys. Rev. D 42 (1990) 293

    1990

  131. [139]

    Bauer, M

    M. Bauer, M. Neubert and A. Thamm, Collider Probes of Axion-Like Particles , JHEP 12 (2017) 044 [ 1708.00443]

    2017 arXiv

  132. [140]

    Bazzocchi, M

    F. Bazzocchi, M. Lattanzi, S. Riemer-Sørensen and J.W.F. Valle, X-ray photons from late-decaying majoron dark matter , JCAP 08 (2008) 013 [ 0805.2372]

    2008 arXiv

  133. [141]

    Joshipura and J.W.F

    A.S. Joshipura and J.W.F. Valle, Invisible Higgs decays and neutrino physics , Nucl. Phys. B 397 (1993) 105

    1993

  134. [142]

    Diaz, M.A

    M.A. Diaz, M.A. Garcia-Jareno, D.A. Restrepo and J.W.F. Valle, Seesaw Majoron model of neutrino mass and novel signals in Higgs boson production at LEP , Nucl. Phys. B 527 (1998) 44 [ hep-ph/9803362]

    1998 arXiv

  135. [143]

    CMS collaboration, Search for invisible decays of the Higgs boson produced via vector boson fusion in proton-proton collisions at s=13 TeV , Phys. Rev. D 105 (2022) 092007 [2201.11585]

    2022

  136. [144]

    ATLAS collaboration, Evidence of off-shell Higgs boson production from ZZ leptonic decay channels and constraints on its total width with the ATLAS detector , Phys. Lett. B 846 (2023) 138223 [ 2304.01532]

    2023

  137. [145]

    P.S.B. Dev, D. Kim, D. Sathyan, K. Sinha and Y. Zhang, New Laboratory Constraints on Neutrinophilic Mediators, 2407.12738

  138. [146]

    Datta, S.K

    A. Datta, S.K. Manna and A. Sil, Spontaneous leptogenesis with sub-GeV axionlike particles, Phys. Rev. D 110 (2024) 095035 [ 2405.07003]

    2024

  139. [147]

    Gouttenoire, G

    Y. Gouttenoire, G. Servant and P. Simakachorn, Kination cosmology from scalar fields and gravitational-wave signatures, 2111.01150

  140. [148]

    Planck collaboration, Planck 2018 results. X. Constraints on inflation , Astron. Astrophys. 641 (2020) A10 [ 1807.06211]

    2018 arXiv

  141. [149]

    Starobinsky and J

    A.A. Starobinsky and J. Yokoyama, Equilibrium state of a selfinteracting scalar field in the De Sitter background, Phys. Rev. D 50 (1994) 6357 [ astro-ph/9407016]

    1994 arXiv

  142. [150]

    M. Dine, L. Randall and S.D. Thomas, Supersymmetry breaking in the early universe , Phys. Rev. Lett. 75 (1995) 398 [ hep-ph/9503303]

    1995 arXiv

  143. [151]

    R.T. Co, K. Harigaya and A. Pierce, Cosmic perturbations from a rotating field , JCAP 10 (2022) 037 [ 2202.01785]

    2022

  144. [152]

    Lee, A.G

    H.M. Lee, A.G. Menkara, M.-J. Seong and J.-H. Song, Peccei-Quinn inflation at the pole and axion kinetic misalignment , JHEP 05 (2024) 295 [ 2310.17710]

    2024

  145. [153]

    Lee, A.G

    H.M. Lee, A.G. Menkara, M.-J. Seong and J.-H. Song, Inflation models with Peccei–Quinn symmetry and axion kinetic misalignment , Eur. Phys. J. C 84 (2024) 1260 [ 2408.17013]

    2024

  146. [154]

    Takahashi and M

    F. Takahashi and M. Yamada, Strongly broken Peccei-Quinn symmetry in the early Universe, JCAP 10 (2015) 010 [ 1507.06387]

    2015 arXiv

  147. [155]

    Bettoni and J

    D. Bettoni and J. Rubio, Quintessential Affleck-Dine baryogenesis with non-minimal couplings, Phys. Lett. B 784 (2018) 122 [ 1805.02669]

    2018 arXiv

  148. [156]

    Berbig, Minimal solution to the axion isocurvature problem from nonminimal coupling , Phys

    M. Berbig, Minimal solution to the axion isocurvature problem from nonminimal coupling , Phys. Rev. D 110 (2024) 095008 [ 2404.06441]

    2024

  149. [157]

    Spokoiny, Deflationary universe scenario , Phys

    B. Spokoiny, Deflationary universe scenario , Phys. Lett. B 315 (1993) 40 [ gr-qc/9306008]. – 55 –

    1993 arXiv

  150. [158]

    Joyce, Electroweak Baryogenesis and the Expansion Rate of the Universe , Phys

    M. Joyce, Electroweak Baryogenesis and the Expansion Rate of the Universe , Phys. Rev. D 55 (1997) 1875 [ hep-ph/9606223]

    1997 arXiv

  151. [159]

    Ferreira and M

    P.G. Ferreira and M. Joyce, Cosmology with a primordial scaling field , Phys. Rev. D 58 (1998) 023503 [ astro-ph/9711102]

    1998 arXiv

  152. [160]

    R.T. Co, D. Dunsky, N. Fernandez, A. Ghalsasi, L.J. Hall, K. Harigaya et al., Gravitational wave and CMB probes of axion kination , JHEP 09 (2022) 116 [ 2108.09299]

    2022

  153. [161]

    Gouttenoire, G

    Y. Gouttenoire, G. Servant and P. Simakachorn, Revealing the Primordial Irreducible Inflationary Gravitational-Wave Background with a Spinning Peccei-Quinn Axion , 2108.10328

  154. [162]

    Kibble, Topology of Cosmic Domains and Strings , J

    T.W.B. Kibble, Topology of Cosmic Domains and Strings , J. Phys. A 9 (1976) 1387

    1976

  155. [163]

    Vilenkin, Gravitational Field of Vacuum Domain Walls and Strings , Phys

    A. Vilenkin, Gravitational Field of Vacuum Domain Walls and Strings , Phys. Rev. D 23 (1981) 852

    1981

  156. [164]

    Sikivie, Of Axions, Domain Walls and the Early Universe , Phys

    P. Sikivie, Of Axions, Domain Walls and the Early Universe , Phys. Rev. Lett. 48 (1982) 1156

    1982

  157. [165]

    Daido, N

    R. Daido, N. Kitajima and F. Takahashi, Axion domain wall baryogenesis , JCAP 07 (2015) 046 [1504.07917]

    2015 arXiv

  158. [166]

    Mariotti, X

    A. Mariotti, X. Nagels, A. Rase and M. Vanvlasselaer, DW-genesis: baryon number from domain wall network collapse , JHEP 03 (2025) 199 [ 2411.13494]

    2025

  159. [167]

    Cohen, D.B

    A.G. Cohen, D.B. Kaplan and A.E. Nelson, Spontaneous baryogenesis at the weak phase transition, Phys. Lett. B 263 (1991) 86

    1991

  160. [168]

    Kobayashi and R.K

    T. Kobayashi and R.K. Jain, Impact of Helical Electromagnetic Fields on the Axion Window, JCAP 03 (2021) 025 [ 2012.00896]

    2021

  161. [169]

    Domcke, B

    V. Domcke, B. von Harling, E. Morgante and K. Mukaida, Baryogenesis from axion inflation, JCAP 10 (2019) 032 [ 1905.13318]

    2019

  162. [170]

    Preskill, M.B

    J. Preskill, M.B. Wise and F. Wilczek, Cosmology of the Invisible Axion , Phys. Lett. B 120 (1983) 127

    1983

  163. [171]

    Abbott and P

    L.F. Abbott and P. Sikivie, A Cosmological Bound on the Invisible Axion , Phys. Lett. B 120 (1983) 133

    1983

  164. [172]

    Dine and W

    M. Dine and W. Fischler, The Not So Harmless Axion , Phys. Lett. B 120 (1983) 137

    1983

  165. [173]

    Grilli di Cortona, E

    G. Grilli di Cortona, E. Hardy, J. Pardo Vega and G. Villadoro, The QCD axion, precisely , JHEP 01 (2016) 034 [ 1511.02867]

    2016 arXiv

  166. [174]

    Jaeckel, V.M

    J. Jaeckel, V.M. Mehta and L.T. Witkowski, Monodromy Dark Matter, JCAP 01 (2017) 036 [1605.01367]

    2017 arXiv

  167. [175]

    Berges, A

    J. Berges, A. Chatrchyan and J. Jaeckel, Foamy Dark Matter from Monodromies , JCAP 08 (2019) 020 [ 1903.03116]

    2019

  168. [176]

    Fonseca, E

    N. Fonseca, E. Morgante, R. Sato and G. Servant, Axion fragmentation, JHEP 04 (2020) 010 [1911.08472]

    2020

  169. [177]

    Morgante, W

    E. Morgante, W. Ratzinger, R. Sato and B.A. Stefanek, Axion fragmentation on the lattice , JHEP 12 (2021) 037 [ 2109.13823]

    2021

  170. [178]

    Er¨ oncel, R

    C. Er¨ oncel, R. Sato, G. Servant and P. Sørensen, ALP dark matter from kinetic fragmentation: opening up the parameter window , JCAP 10 (2022) 053 [ 2206.14259]. – 56 –

    2022

  171. [179]

    R.T. Co, K. Harigaya and A. Pierce, Gravitational waves and dark photon dark matter from axion rotations, JHEP 12 (2021) 099 [ 2104.02077]

    2021

  172. [180]

    Bodas, R.T

    A. Bodas, R.T. Co, A. Ghalsasi, K. Harigaya and L.-T. Wang, Acoustic Misalignment Mechanism for Axion Dark Matter , 2503.04888

  173. [181]

    Er¨ oncel, Y

    C. Er¨ oncel, Y. Gouttenoire, R. Sato, G. Servant and P. Simakachorn, A New Source for (QCD) Axion Dark Matter Production: Curvature-Induced , 2503.04880

  174. [182]

    R.T. Co, L.J. Hall and K. Harigaya, QCD Axion Dark Matter with a Small Decay Constant, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 (2018) 211602 [ 1711.10486]

    2018 arXiv

  175. [183]

    Kasuya and M

    S. Kasuya and M. Kawasaki, Topological defects formation after inflation on lattice simulation, Phys. Rev. D 58 (1998) 083516 [ hep-ph/9804429]

    1998 arXiv

  176. [184]

    Kasuya and M

    S. Kasuya and M. Kawasaki, Comments on cosmic string formation during preheating on lattice simulations, Phys. Rev. D 61 (2000) 083510 [ hep-ph/9903324]

    2000 arXiv

  177. [185]

    Kawasaki, T.T

    M. Kawasaki, T.T. Yanagida and K. Yoshino, Domain wall and isocurvature perturbation problems in axion models , JCAP 11 (2013) 030 [ 1305.5338]

    2013 arXiv

  178. [186]

    Zeldovich, I.Y

    Y.B. Zeldovich, I.Y. Kobzarev and L.B. Okun, Cosmological Consequences of the Spontaneous Breakdown of Discrete Symmetry , Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 67 (1974) 3

    1974

  179. [187]

    Vilenkin and A.E

    A. Vilenkin and A.E. Everett, Cosmic Strings and Domain Walls in Models with Goldstone and PseudoGoldstone Bosons , Phys. Rev. Lett. 48 (1982) 1867

    1982

  180. [188]

    S.M. Barr, K. Choi and J.E. Kim, Some aspects of axion cosmology in unified and superstring models, Nucl. Phys. B 283 (1987) 591

    1987

  181. [189]

    Kibble, G

    T.W.B. Kibble, G. Lazarides and Q. Shafi, Walls bounded by strings , Phys. Rev. D 26 (1982) 435

    1982

  182. [190]

    Kawasaki, K

    M. Kawasaki, K. Saikawa and T. Sekiguchi, Axion dark matter from topological defects , Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015) 065014 [ 1412.0789]

    2015 arXiv

  183. [191]

    Berbig, About electroweak domain walls in Majoron models , 2506.02910

    M. Berbig, About electroweak domain walls in Majoron models , 2506.02910

  184. [192]

    Preskill, S.P

    J. Preskill, S.P. Trivedi, F. Wilczek and M.B. Wise, Cosmology and broken discrete symmetry, Nucl. Phys. B 363 (1991) 207

    1991

  185. [193]

    Audren, J

    B. Audren, J. Lesgourgues, G. Mangano, P.D. Serpico and T. Tram, Strongest model-independent bound on the lifetime of Dark Matter , JCAP 12 (2014) 028 [1407.2418]

    2014 arXiv

  186. [194]

    Enqvist, S

    K. Enqvist, S. Nadathur, T. Sekiguchi and T. Takahashi, Constraints on decaying dark matter from weak lensing and cluster counts , JCAP 04 (2020) 015 [ 1906.09112]

    2020

  187. [195]

    Nygaard, T

    A. Nygaard, T. Tram and S. Hannestad, Updated constraints on decaying cold dark matter , JCAP 05 (2021) 017 [ 2011.01632]

    2021

  188. [196]

    S. Alvi, T. Brinckmann, M. Gerbino, M. Lattanzi and L. Pagano, Do you smell something decaying? Updated linear constraints on decaying dark matter scenarios , JCAP 11 (2022) 015 [2205.05636]

    2022

  189. [197]

    XENON collaboration, Search for New Physics in Electronic Recoil Data from XENONnT , Phys. Rev. Lett. 129 (2022) 161805 [ 2207.11330]

    2022

  190. [198]

    Panci, D

    P. Panci, D. Redigolo, T. Schwetz and R. Ziegler, Axion dark matter from lepton flavor-violating decays, Phys. Lett. B 841 (2023) 137919 [ 2209.03371]. – 57 –

    2023

  191. [199]

    Palomares-Ruiz, Model-independent bound on the dark matter lifetime , Phys

    S. Palomares-Ruiz, Model-independent bound on the dark matter lifetime , Phys. Lett. B 665 (2008) 50 [ 0712.1937]

    2008 arXiv

  192. [200]

    Super-Kamiokande collaboration, Search for anti-nu(e) from the sun at Super-Kamiokande I, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90 (2003) 171302 [ hep-ex/0212067]

    2003 arXiv

  193. [201]

    Super-Kamiokande collaboration, Supernova Relic Neutrino Search with Neutron Tagging at Super-Kamiokande-IV, Astropart. Phys. 60 (2015) 41 [ 1311.3738]

    2015 arXiv

  194. [202]

    Borexino collaboration, Study of solar and other unknown anti-neutrino fluxes with Borexino at LNGS , Phys. Lett. B 696 (2011) 191 [ 1010.0029]

    2011 arXiv

  195. [203]

    KamLAND collaboration, A study of extraterrestrial antineutrino sources with the KamLAND detector, Astrophys. J. 745 (2012) 193 [ 1105.3516]

    2012 arXiv

  196. [204]

    McKeen, Cosmic neutrino background search experiments as decaying dark matter detectors, Phys

    D. McKeen, Cosmic neutrino background search experiments as decaying dark matter detectors, Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 015028 [ 1812.08178]

    2019 arXiv

  197. [205]

    Chacko, P

    Z. Chacko, P. Du and M. Geller, Detecting a Secondary Cosmic Neutrino Background from Majoron Decays in Neutrino Capture Experiments , Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 015050 [1812.11154]

    2019

  198. [206]

    S. Betts et al., Development of a Relic Neutrino Detection Experiment at PTOLEMY: Princeton Tritium Observatory for Light, Early-Universe, Massive-Neutrino Yield , in Snowmass 2013: Snowmass on the Mississippi , 7, 2013 [ 1307.4738]

    2013 arXiv

  199. [207]

    PTOLEMY collaboration, PTOLEMY: A Proposal for Thermal Relic Detection of Massive Neutrinos and Directional Detection of MeV Dark Matter , 1808.01892

    arXiv

  200. [208]

    Bauer and J.D

    M. Bauer and J.D. Shergold, Limits on the cosmic neutrino background , JCAP 01 (2023) 003 [2207.12413]

    2023

  201. [209]

    PTOLEMY collaboration, Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle in the PTOLEMY project: A theory update, Phys. Rev. D 106 (2022) 053002 [ 2203.11228]

    2022

  202. [210]

    Cheipesh, V

    Y. Cheipesh, V. Cheianov and A. Boyarsky, Navigating the pitfalls of relic neutrino detection, Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021) 116004 [ 2101.10069]

    2021

  203. [211]

    Abazajian and J

    K.N. Abazajian and J. Heeck, Observing Dirac neutrinos in the cosmic microwave background, Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 075027 [ 1908.03286]

    2019

  204. [212]

    Fields, K.A

    B.D. Fields, K.A. Olive, T.-H. Yeh and C. Young, Big-Bang Nucleosynthesis after Planck , JCAP 03 (2020) 010 [ 1912.01132]

    2020

  205. [213]

    T.-H. Yeh, J. Shelton, K.A. Olive and B.D. Fields, Probing physics beyond the standard model: limits from BBN and the CMB independently and combined , JCAP 10 (2022) 046 [2207.13133]

    2022

  206. [214]

    ACT collaboration, The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR6 Constraints on Extended Cosmological Models, 2503.14454

    arXiv

  207. [215]

    CORE collaboration, Exploring cosmic origins with CORE: Survey requirements and mission design, JCAP 04 (2018) 014 [ 1706.04516]

    2018

  208. [216]

    Laureijs, J

    R. Laureijs, J. Amiaux, S. Arduini, J.L. Augu` eres, J. Brinchmann, R. Cole et al., Euclid Definition Study Report, arXiv e-prints (2011) arXiv:1110.3193 [ 1110.3193]

    2011 arXiv

  209. [217]

    SPIE Int

    SPT-3G collaboration, SPT-3G: A Next-Generation Cosmic Microwave Background Polarization Experiment on the South Pole Telescope , Proc. SPIE Int. Soc. Opt. Eng. 9153 (2014) 91531P [ 1407.2973]. – 58 –

    2014 arXiv

  210. [218]

    Simons Observatory collaboration, The Simons Observatory: Science goals and forecasts , JCAP 02 (2019) 056 [ 1808.07445]

    2019 arXiv

  211. [219]

    CMB-S4 Science Case, Reference Design, and Project Plan

    K. Abazajian et al., “CMB-S4 Science Case, Reference Design, and Project Plan.” 7, 2019

    2019

  212. [220]

    Abazajian and M

    K.N. Abazajian and M. Kaplinghat, Neutrino physics from the cosmic microwave background and large-scale structure, Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science 66 (2016) 401 [ https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-nucl-102014-021908]

    2016 doi

  213. [221]

    PICO: Probe of Inflation and Cosmic Origins

    NASA PICO collaboration, “PICO: Probe of Inflation and Cosmic Origins.” 3, 2019

    2019

  214. [222]

    CMB-HD collaboration, Snowmass2021 CMB-HD White Paper , 2203.05728

  215. [223]

    Irˇ siˇ c et al.,New Constraints on the free-streaming of warm dark matter from intermediate and small scale Lyman- α forest data, Phys

    V. Irˇ siˇ c et al.,New Constraints on the free-streaming of warm dark matter from intermediate and small scale Lyman- α forest data, Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 023522 [1702.01764]

    2017 arXiv

  216. [224]

    Lopez-Honorez, O

    L. Lopez-Honorez, O. Mena, S. Palomares-Ruiz and P. Villanueva-Domingo, Warm dark matter and the ionization history of the Universe , Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 103539 [1703.02302]

    2017 arXiv

  217. [225]

    Ballesteros, M.A.G

    G. Ballesteros, M.A.G. Garcia and M. Pierre, How warm are non-thermal relics? Lyman- α bounds on out-of-equilibrium dark matter , JCAP 03 (2021) 101 [ 2011.13458]

    2021

  218. [226]

    D’Eramo and A

    F. D’Eramo and A. Lenoci, Lower mass bounds on FIMP dark matter produced via freeze-in, JCAP 10 (2021) 045 [ 2012.01446]

    2021

  219. [227]

    Decant, J

    Q. Decant, J. Heisig, D.C. Hooper and L. Lopez-Honorez, Lyman-α constraints on freeze-in and superWIMPs, JCAP 03 (2022) 041 [ 2111.09321]

    2022

  220. [228]

    L.J. Hall, K. Jedamzik, J. March-Russell and S.M. West, Freeze-In Production of FIMP Dark Matter, JHEP 03 (2010) 080 [ 0911.1120]

    2010 arXiv

  221. [229]

    Cielo, M

    M. Cielo, M. Escudero, G. Mangano and O. Pisanti, Neff in the Standard Model at NLO is 3.043, Phys. Rev. D 108 (2023) L121301 [ 2306.05460]

    2023

  222. [230]

    Drewes, Y

    M. Drewes, Y. Georis, M. Klasen, L.P. Wiggering and Y.Y.Y. Wong, Towards a precision calculation of N ef f in the Standard Model. Part III. Improved estimate of NLO contributions to the collision integral , JCAP 06 (2024) 032 [ 2402.18481]

    2024

  223. [231]

    X. Luo, W. Rodejohann and X.-J. Xu, Dirac neutrinos and N ef f. Part II. The freeze-in case, JCAP 03 (2021) 082 [ 2011.13059]

    2021

  224. [232]

    Heeck and D

    J. Heeck and D. Teresi, Cold keV dark matter from decays and scatterings , Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 035018 [ 1706.09909]

    2017 arXiv

  225. [233]

    Elahi, C

    F. Elahi, C. Kolda and J. Unwin, UltraViolet Freeze-in, JHEP 03 (2015) 048 [ 1410.6157]

    2015 arXiv

  226. [234]

    Domcke, Y

    V. Domcke, Y. Ema, K. Mukaida and M. Yamada, Spontaneous Baryogenesis from Axions with Generic Couplings , JHEP 08 (2020) 096 [ 2006.03148]

    2020

  227. [235]

    D’Onofrio, K

    M. D’Onofrio, K. Rummukainen and A. Tranberg, Sphaleron Rate in the Minimal Standard Model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 (2014) 141602 [ 1404.3565]

    2014 arXiv

  228. [236]

    Giudice, A

    G.F. Giudice, A. Notari, M. Raidal, A. Riotto and A. Strumia, Towards a complete theory of thermal leptogenesis in the SM and MSSM , Nucl. Phys. B 685 (2004) 89 [hep-ph/0310123]

    2004 arXiv

  229. [237]

    Harvey and M.S

    J.A. Harvey and M.S. Turner, Cosmological baryon and lepton number in the presence of electroweak fermion number violation, Phys. Rev. D 42 (1990) 3344. – 59 –

    1990

  230. [238]

    Nardi, Y

    E. Nardi, Y. Nir, J. Racker and E. Roulet, On Higgs and sphaleron effects during the leptogenesis era, JHEP 01 (2006) 068 [ hep-ph/0512052]

    2006 arXiv

  231. [239]

    Ballesteros, J

    G. Ballesteros, J. Redondo, A. Ringwald and C. Tamarit, Unifying inflation with the axion, dark matter, baryogenesis and the seesaw mechanism , Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 (2017) 071802 [1608.05414]

    2017 arXiv

  232. [240]

    Ballesteros, J

    G. Ballesteros, J. Redondo, A. Ringwald and C. Tamarit, Standard Model—axion—seesaw—Higgs portal inflation. Five problems of particle physics and cosmology solved in one stroke , JCAP 08 (2017) 001 [ 1610.01639]

    2017 arXiv

  233. [241]

    Liang, X

    Q. Liang, X. Ponce D´ ıaz and T.T. Yanagida,Axion Detection Experiments Can Probe Majoron Models, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134 (2025) 151803 [ 2406.19083]

    2025

  234. [242]

    Kofman, A.D

    L. Kofman, A.D. Linde and A.A. Starobinsky, Nonthermal phase transitions after inflation , Phys. Rev. Lett. 76 (1996) 1011 [ hep-th/9510119]

    1996 arXiv

  235. [243]

    Arbuzova, A.D

    E.V. Arbuzova, A.D. Dolgov and V.A. Novikov, General properties and kinetics of spontaneous baryogenesis, Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) 123501 [ 1607.01247]

    2016 arXiv

  236. [244]

    Redi and A

    M. Redi and A. Tesi, Meso-inflationary QCD axion , Phys. Rev. D 107 (2023) 095032 [2211.06421]

    2023

  237. [245]

    Enqvist, D.G

    K. Enqvist, D.G. Figueroa and G. Rigopoulos, Fluctuations along supersymmetric flat directions during Inflation, JCAP 01 (2012) 053 [ 1109.3024]. – 60 –

    2012 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed May 19, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.