pith. the verified trust layer for science. sign in

arxiv: 2006.11237 · v2 · pith:6IOSMRZVnew · submitted 2020-06-19 · ✦ hep-ph · astro-ph.CO· hep-ex

2020 Global reassessment of the neutrino oscillation picture

P. F. de Salas , D. V. Forero , S. Gariazzo , P. Mart\'inez-Mirav\'e , O. Mena , C. A. Ternes , M. T\'ortola , J. W. F. Valle This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 08:43 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph astro-ph.COhep-ex
keywords neutrino oscillationsglobal fitmass orderingmixing anglesCP violationreactor neutrinosaccelerator neutrinossolar neutrinos
0
0 comments X p. Extension
Add this Pith Number to your LaTeX paper What is a Pith Number? 
\usepackage{pith}
\pithnumber{6IOSMRZV}

Prints a linked pith:6IOSMRZV badge after your title and writes the identifier into PDF metadata. Compiles on arXiv with no extra files. Learn more

The pith

Global neutrino data now prefer normal mass ordering at 2.5 sigma, though less strongly than earlier fits.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper updates the global analysis of all neutrino oscillation measurements inside the standard three-neutrino model. It folds in fresh reactor, accelerator, solar, and atmospheric data to tighten the allowed ranges for the mixing angles and mass splittings. The combined fit shows a modest preference for normal neutrino mass ordering. A sympathetic reader would care because the ordering choice directly shapes the expected rate of neutrinoless double beta decay and the target sensitivity of upcoming long-baseline experiments.

Core claim

Within the three-neutrino framework the latest inputs produce tighter constraints on θ13, θ12, Δm21² and |Δm31²|. The atmospheric angle θ23 is best fit in the second octant yet first-octant solutions remain allowed at roughly 2.4 sigma. The CP phase δ sits near 1.08π for normal ordering and 1.58π for inverted ordering. Overall the data favor normal neutrino mass ordering at 2.5 sigma significance, a milder preference than previous global analyses.

What carries the argument

A global statistical combination of likelihoods from reactor, accelerator, solar and atmospheric experiments that extracts the six oscillation parameters and compares the two possible mass orderings.

If this is right

  • More precise θ13 and |Δm31²| tighten the predicted appearance probabilities at future accelerator experiments.
  • The mild normal-ordering preference reduces but does not eliminate the allowed range for the effective Majorana mass in neutrinoless double beta decay searches.
  • Cosmological upper limits on the sum of neutrino masses become slightly more restrictive when normal ordering is assumed.
  • The best-fit CP phase near 1.08π implies a specific pattern of CP violation that can be tested by next-generation oscillation measurements.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the three-neutrino picture remains valid, the ordering preference will be settled by the first few years of DUNE and Hyper-Kamiokande data.
  • The fact that cosmology alone raises the significance to 2.7 sigma suggests that joint oscillation-plus-cosmology analyses will become standard for mass-ordering claims.
  • A confirmed normal ordering would focus theoretical model-building on mechanisms that naturally produce hierarchical neutrino masses rather than quasi-degenerate spectra.

Load-bearing premise

The input analyses supplied by each experiment contain no large unaccounted systematic biases that would change the combined preference for mass ordering.

What would settle it

A new long-baseline or reactor result that shifts the combined χ² minimum to favor inverted ordering at more than 3 sigma would overturn the current 2.5 sigma preference.

read the original abstract

We present an updated global fit of neutrino oscillation data in the simplest three-neutrino framework. In the present study we include up-to-date analyses from a number of experiments. Concerning the atmospheric and solar sectors, we give updated analyses of DeepCore and SNO data, respectively. We have also included the latest electron antineutrino data collected by the Daya Bay and RENO reactor experiments, and the long-baseline T2K and NO$\nu$A measurements. These new analyses result in more accurate measurements of $\theta_{13}$, $\theta_{12}$, $\Delta m_{21}^2$ and $|\Delta m_{31}^2|$. The best fit value for the atmospheric angle $\theta_{23}$ lies in the second octant, but first octant solutions remain allowed at $\sim2.4\sigma$. Regarding CP violation measurements, the preferred value of $\delta$ we obtain is 1.08$\pi$ (1.58$\pi$) for normal (inverted) neutrino mass ordering. The global analysis prefers normal neutrino mass ordering with 2.5$\sigma$. This preference is milder than the one found in previous global analyses. The new results should be regarded as robust due to the agreement found between our Bayesian and frequentist approaches. Taking into account only oscillation data, there is a weak/moderate preference for the normal neutrino mass ordering of $2.00\sigma$. While adding neutrinoless double beta decay from the latest Gerda, CUORE and KamLAND-Zen results barely modifies this picture, cosmological measurements raise the preference to $2.68\sigma$ within a conservative approach. A more aggressive data set combination of cosmological observations leads to a similar preference, namely $2.70\sigma$. This very same cosmological data set provides $2\sigma$ upper limits on the total neutrino mass corresponding to $\sum\nu<0.12$ ($0.15$)~eV for normal (inverted) neutrino mass ordering.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents an updated global fit of neutrino oscillation data in the three-neutrino framework, incorporating updated analyses of DeepCore and SNO data along with the latest from Daya Bay, RENO, T2K, and NOvA. It reports more accurate measurements of several oscillation parameters, a best-fit atmospheric angle in the second octant, preferred CP phases, and a 2.5σ preference for normal neutrino mass ordering that is milder than in previous analyses. The preference increases slightly when including cosmological data.

Significance. If the results hold, this reassessment provides a timely update on the global neutrino picture, emphasizing the current mild preference for normal ordering and the consistency between Bayesian and frequentist methods. The inclusion of both oscillation-only and cosmology-augmented fits is a strength, offering a comprehensive view.

major comments (2)
  1. [Results section (mass ordering discussion)] The central claim of a 2.5σ preference for normal ordering (milder than prior fits) is extracted from the difference in best-fit chi-squared or posterior volume. The manuscript does not present a dedicated propagation or sensitivity study of plausible variations in the individual input likelihoods (e.g., atmospheric flux or detector response in the updated DeepCore analysis) to test whether the significance remains above 2σ. This is load-bearing for the robustness statement in the abstract and results.
  2. [§4 (Global fit results)] Table or figure showing per-experiment contributions to the global Delta chi^2 (or posterior odds) for the two orderings would allow readers to assess which datasets drive the 2.5σ preference and whether any single input analysis dominates.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract could include one sentence on the treatment of systematic errors or data-selection cuts in the combined fit.
  2. [Throughout] Minor notation inconsistency: ensure |Delta m31^2| is used uniformly when referring to the atmospheric mass splitting.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments. We appreciate the recognition of the timely update provided by our global fit and the value of including both oscillation-only and cosmology-augmented results. We address each major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Results section (mass ordering discussion)] The central claim of a 2.5σ preference for normal ordering (milder than prior fits) is extracted from the difference in best-fit chi-squared or posterior volume. The manuscript does not present a dedicated propagation or sensitivity study of plausible variations in the individual input likelihoods (e.g., atmospheric flux or detector response in the updated DeepCore analysis) to test whether the significance remains above 2σ. This is load-bearing for the robustness statement in the abstract and results.

    Authors: We agree that additional checks on the robustness of the mass-ordering preference would be valuable. Our global fit uses the published likelihood functions from each experiment, which already fold in their respective systematic uncertainties, including variations in atmospheric flux and detector response for the updated DeepCore analysis. The milder 2.5σ preference relative to earlier global fits arises directly from these updated inputs. A full end-to-end propagation of every plausible variation would require re-deriving the individual experimental likelihoods with modified internal parameters, which lies outside the scope of a global reassessment that relies on published results. Nevertheless, we will add a short paragraph in the results section that quantifies the effect of the dominant systematics quoted in the DeepCore and other key papers on the Δχ² difference between orderings, thereby supporting the robustness statement. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [§4 (Global fit results)] Table or figure showing per-experiment contributions to the global Delta chi^2 (or posterior odds) for the two orderings would allow readers to assess which datasets drive the 2.5σ preference and whether any single input analysis dominates.

    Authors: We thank the referee for this helpful suggestion. We will insert a new table in §4 that tabulates the individual Δχ² contributions (and the corresponding posterior odds in the Bayesian analysis) of each experiment to the global preference for normal versus inverted ordering. This breakdown will make transparent which data sets are responsible for the 2.5σ preference and confirm that no single analysis dominates the result. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: global fit derives ordering preference directly from external data inputs

full rationale

The paper conducts a global fit within the three-neutrino framework by incorporating updated analyses of DeepCore and SNO data along with the latest measurements from Daya Bay, RENO, T2K, and NOvA. The 2.5σ preference for normal mass ordering emerges from the difference in best-fit chi-squared values or posterior volumes between the two orderings in the combined likelihood. This process relies on external experimental likelihoods and does not reduce any central result to a self-definition, a fitted parameter relabeled as a prediction, or a load-bearing self-citation chain. The derivation remains self-contained against the input data sets, with agreement between Bayesian and frequentist methods providing internal consistency checks independent of the target claim.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the validity of the three-neutrino oscillation framework and on the accuracy of the input experimental analyses; no additional free parameters beyond the standard oscillation parameters are introduced in the abstract.

free parameters (1)
  • oscillation parameters (theta12, theta13, theta23, delta, Delta m21^2, |Delta m31^2|)
    These are fitted to the combined data set; their best-fit values and uncertainties constitute the main output.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Three active neutrinos with standard oscillations and no sterile neutrinos
    The entire analysis is performed inside the simplest three-neutrino framework stated in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5947 in / 1210 out tokens · 33626 ms · 2026-05-19T08:43:36.335146+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 19 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Effective Matter Flavor Conversion Mediated by Pseudo-Sterile States as the Possible Origin of Neutrino Oscillation Anomalies

    hep-ph 2026-05 conditional novelty 6.0

    A sterile neutrino with a novel density-dependent matter potential Vs resolves multiple oscillation anomalies when Vs is negative and mixing angles are small.

  2. Two-loop neutrino mass model with modular $S_4$ symmetry

    hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A two-loop neutrino mass model with modular S4 and Z3 symmetries reproduces charged lepton masses and normal-ordering neutrino data while predicting observable LFV and viable DM candidates.

  3. Matter- and magnetically-driven flavor conversion of neutrinos in magnetorotational collapses

    astro-ph.HE 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    In magnetorotational stellar collapses, neutrinos undergo resonant flavor conversion in matter plus magnetic-moment-driven chirality flipping for Majorana neutrinos, producing orientation-dependent event rates at dete...

  4. Towards a complete scheme of cosmological neutrino self-interactions: Collision term for a wide range of mediator masses

    hep-ph 2026-02 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A new scheme for the neutrino collision term valid from light to heavy mediator regimes, with smooth transition as the universe cools, for scalar-mediated NSI in Dirac and Majorana cases.

  5. Lessons from the first JUNO results

    hep-ph 2026-01 conditional novelty 6.0

    JUNO's initial results combined with global data give a 2.2-2.3 sigma preference for normal neutrino mass ordering.

  6. Amplifying muon-to-positron conversion in nuclei with ultralight dark matter

    hep-ph 2025-07 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Ultralight scalar dark matter amplifies the lepton-flavor-violating muon-to-positron conversion rate via an effective Majorana mass m_μe, yielding new constraints on flavor-off-diagonal neutrino couplings from SINDRUM...

  7. DESI 2024 VII: Cosmological Constraints from the Full-Shape Modeling of Clustering Measurements

    astro-ph.CO 2024-11 accept novelty 6.0

    DESI DR1 full-shape clustering yields Ω_m = 0.2962 ± 0.0095 and σ_8 = 0.842 ± 0.034 in flat ΛCDM, tightening to H_0 = 68.40 ± 0.27 km/s/Mpc with CMB and DESY3, while favoring w_0 > -1, w_a < 0 and limiting neutrino ma...

  8. Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Solving Two-Flavor Neutrino Oscillations in Vacuum and Matter Environments for Atmospheric and Reactor Neutrinos

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    PINNs solve two-flavor neutrino oscillation equations in vacuum and matter with mean squared errors of 10^{-3} to 10^{-4}, matching analytical solutions.

  9. Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Solving Two-Flavor Neutrino Oscillations in Vacuum and Matter Environments for Atmospheric and Reactor Neutrinos

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Physics-informed neural networks solve two-flavor neutrino oscillation equations in vacuum and matter with mean squared errors of order 10^{-3} to 10^{-4}, matching analytical results.

  10. Astrophysical bounds on the high-energy evolution of neutrino mixing

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    High-energy astrophysical neutrinos can constrain the running of neutrino mixing parameters with energy, with future multi-detector setups forecast to set strong bounds despite astrophysical uncertainties.

  11. Type II Seesaw Leptogenesis in a Majoron background

    hep-ph 2025-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Spontaneous wash-in leptogenesis in Type II Seesaw with Majoron pNGB background enables baryon asymmetry generation alongside dark matter cogenesis for specific v_T, v_sigma and m_j ranges.

  12. Constraints on Neutrino Physics from DESI DR2 BAO and DR1 Full Shape

    astro-ph.CO 2025-03 conditional novelty 5.0

    DESI DR2 BAO and full-shape data plus CMB yield ∑m_ν < 0.0642 eV (95% CL) under ΛCDM, in 3σ tension with oscillation lower limits, relaxed to <0.163 eV in w0waCDM.

  13. Dark Matter as a Source for Lepton Flavor Violation

    hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    A dark matter fermion is shown to simultaneously explain the relic density, satisfy direct detection and collider bounds, and produce observable rates for muon-to-electron transitions in a viable parameter region.

  14. Fate of $\theta_{12}$ under $\mu-\tau$ Reflection Symmetry in Light of the First JUNO Results

    hep-ph 2026-02 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    A model with μ-τ reflection symmetry from A4 predicts sin²θ12 ≳ 0.335 which is disfavored by JUNO results, leaving a surviving scenario with testable correlations to model parameters.

  15. Generalized Neutrino Interactions: constraints and parametrizations

    hep-ph 2026-02 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Relating two GNI parametrizations shows scalar neutrino-quark interactions are more tightly constrained by COHERENT while tensor interactions are better bounded by deep inelastic scattering.

  16. The sensitivity of liquid scintillator detectors to CP-violation with atmospheric neutrinos

    hep-ex 2025-07 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Liquid scintillator detectors of a few kilotons can probe the CP-violating phase in atmospheric neutrino oscillations via rate, spectrum, and zenith-angle distributions analyzed with Poisson likelihood.

  17. Implications of the First JUNO Results for Dirac Neutrino Texture Zeros

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    JUNO data strongly disfavors Dirac neutrino texture zero pattern C, leaving only patterns A1 and A2 compatible with current oscillation observables.

  18. Revisiting lepton flavor violation: $\tau$ and meson decays

    hep-ph 2025-11 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    Updated type-I seesaw analysis shows semileptonic tau decays like tau to lepton rho can dominate cLFV signals and some branching ratios may reach next-generation experiment sensitivity.

  19. NuFit-6.0: Updated global analysis of three-flavor neutrino oscillations

    hep-ph 2024-10 accept novelty 3.0

    Updated global analysis finds well-determined neutrino mixing parameters with nearly equal preference for normal and inverted mass orderings in the full dataset.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

129 extracted references · 129 canonical work pages · cited by 18 Pith papers · 89 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    The average relative fission fractions for these reactor cores can be found in Ref

    Two functionally identical 16 ton detectors placed at 294 m and 1383 m from the centerline of the antineutrino sources, detect electron antineutrinos produced by six pressurized water reactors (all equally distributed in space along a 3 km line), each with output thermal powers of 2 .6 GWth or 2.8 GWth. The average relative fission fractions for these reac...

    work page 1958

  2. [2]

    wrong-sign

    Note, however, that the Super-Kamiokande experiment also detected a large sample of 7 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 sin2 23 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5| m2 31| [10 3 eV2] NO90, 99% C.L. SK DeepCore 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 sin2 23 IO90, 99% C.L. SK DeepCore FIG. 3: 90 and 99% C.L. (2 d.o.f.) allowed regions at the sin 2θ23–∆m2 31 plane for NO (left) and IO (right), ...

    work page 2012

  3. [3]

    Status of neutrino oscillations 2018: first hint for normal mass ordering and improved CP sensitivity

    P. F. de Salas, D. V. Forero, C. A. Ternes, M. T´ ortola, and J. W. F. Valle, “Status of neutrino oscillations 2018: 3 σ hint for normal mass ordering and improved CP sensitivity,” Phys. Lett. B 782 (Jul, 2018) 633–640, arXiv:1708.01186 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  4. [4]

    Neutrino oscillations refitted

    D. V. Forero, M. Tortola, and J. W. F. Valle, “Neutrino oscillations refitted,” Phys.Rev.D 90 no. 9, (2014) 093006, arXiv:1405.7540 [hep-ph] . 28

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  5. [5]

    Global status of neutrino oscillation parameters after Neutrino-2012

    D. V. Forero, M. Tortola, and J. W. F. Valle, “Global status of neutrino oscillation parameters after Neutrino-2012,” Phys. Rev. D86 (2012) 073012, arXiv:1205.4018 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  6. [6]

    Where we are on $\theta_{13}$: addendum to "Global neutrino data and recent reactor fluxes: status of three-flavour oscillation parameters"

    T. Schwetz, M. Tortola, and J. W. F. Valle, “Where we are on θ13: addendum to ‘Global neutrino data and recent reactor fluxes: status of three-flavour oscillation parameters’,” New J. Phys. 13 (2011) 109401, arXiv:1108.1376 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  7. [7]

    Global neutrino data and recent reactor fluxes: status of three-flavour oscillation parameters

    T. Schwetz, M. Tortola, and J. W. F. Valle, “Global neutrino data and recent reactor fluxes: status of three-flavour oscillation parameters,” New J. Phys. 13 (2011) 063004, arXiv:1103.0734 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  8. [8]

    Three-flavour neutrino oscillation update

    T. Schwetz, M. Tortola, and J. W. F. Valle, “Three-flavour neutrino oscillation update,” New J. Phys. 10 (2008) 113011, arXiv:0808.2016 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  9. [9]

    Status of global fits to neutrino oscillations

    M. Maltoni, T. Schwetz, M. A. Tortola, and J. W. F. Valle, “Status of global fits to neutrino oscillations,” New J.Phys. 6 (2004) 122, arXiv:hep-ph/0405172 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  10. [10]

    Status of three-neutrino oscillations after the SNO-salt data

    M. Maltoni, T. Schwetz, M. A. Tortola, and J. W. F. Valle, “Status of three neutrino oscillations after the SNO salt data,” Phys. Rev. D68 (2003) 113010, arXiv:hep-ph/0309130 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  11. [11]

    The fate of hints: updated global analysis of three-flavor neutrino oscillations,

    I. Esteban, M. Gonzalez-Garcia, M. Maltoni, T. Schwetz, and A. Zhou, “The fate of hints: updated global analysis of three-flavor neutrino oscillations,” JHEP 09 (2020) 178, arXiv:2007.14792 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  12. [12]

    Addendum to: Global constraints on absolute neutrino masses and their ordering,

    F. Capozzi, E. Di Valentino, E. Lisi, A. Marrone, A. Melchiorri, and A. Palazzo, “Addendum to: Global constraints on absolute neutrino masses and their ordering,” arXiv:2003.08511 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2003

  13. [13]

    Direct Evidence for Neutrino Flavor Transformation from Neutral-Current Interactions in the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory

    SNO Collaboration, Q. Ahmad et al., “Direct evidence for neutrino flavor transformation from neutral current interactions in the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory,” Phys.Rev.Lett. 89 (2002) 011301, nucl-ex/0204008

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  14. [14]

    Evidence for oscillation of atmospheric neutrinos

    Super-Kamiokande Collaboration, Y. Fukuda et al., “Evidence for oscillation of atmospheric neutrinos,” Phys.Rev.Lett. 81 (1998) 1562–1567, hep-ex/9807003

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  15. [15]

    Nobel Lecture: The Sudbury Neutrino Observatory: Observation of flavor change for solar neutrinos,

    A. B. McDonald, “Nobel Lecture: The Sudbury Neutrino Observatory: Observation of flavor change for solar neutrinos,” Rev.Mod.Phys. 88 no. 3, (2016) 030502

    work page 2016

  16. [16]

    Nobel Lecture: Discovery of atmospheric neutrino oscillations,

    T. Kajita, “Nobel Lecture: Discovery of atmospheric neutrino oscillations,” Rev.Mod.Phys. 88 no. 3, (2016) 030501

    work page 2016

  17. [17]

    First Results from KamLAND: Evidence for Reactor Anti-Neutrino Disappearance

    KamLAND Collaboration, K. Eguchi et al., “First results from KamLAND: Evidence for reactor anti-neutrino disappearance,” Phys.Rev.Lett. 90 (2003) 021802, hep-ex/0212021

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  18. [18]

    The Simplest Resonant Spin--Flavour Solution to the Solar Neutrino Problem

    O. Miranda, C. Pena-Garay, T. Rashba, V. Semikoz, and J. Valle, “The Simplest resonant spin flavor solution to the solar neutrino problem,” Nucl. Phys. B 595 (2001) 360–380, arXiv:hep-ph/0005259

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  19. [19]

    A non-resonant dark-side solution to the solar neutrino problem

    O. Miranda, C. Pena-Garay, T. Rashba, V. Semikoz, and J. Valle, “A Nonresonant dark side solution to the solar neutrino problem,” Phys. Lett. B 521 (2001) 299–307, arXiv:hep-ph/0108145

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  20. [20]

    Confronting Spin Flavor Solutions of the Solar Neutrino Problem with current and future solar neutrino data

    J. Barranco, O. Miranda, T. Rashba, V. Semikoz, and J. Valle, “Confronting spin flavor solutions of the solar neutrino problem with current and future solar neutrino data,” Phys.Rev. D66 (2002) 093009, hep-ph/0207326

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  21. [21]

    Atmospheric neutrino observations and flavor changing interactions

    M. Gonzalez-Garcia, M. Guzzo, P. Krastev, H. Nunokawa, O. Peres, V. Pleitez, J. Valle, and R. Zukanovich Funchal, “Atmospheric neutrino observations and flavor changing interactions,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 82 (1999) 3202–3205, arXiv:hep-ph/9809531

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  22. [22]

    Status of a hybrid three-neutrino interpretation of neutrino data

    M. Guzzo, P. de Holanda, M. Maltoni, H. Nunokawa, M. Tortola, and J. W. F. Valle, “Status of a hybrid three neutrino interpretation of neutrino data,” Nucl.Phys. B629 (2002) 479–490, hep-ph/0112310

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  23. [23]

    Are solar neutrino oscillations robust?

    O. G. Miranda, M. A. Tortola, and J. W. F. Valle, “Are solar neutrino oscillations robust?,” JHEP 29 10 (2006) 008, hep-ph/0406280

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  24. [24]

    Updated Constraints on Non-Standard Interactions from Global Analysis of Oscillation Data,

    I. Esteban, M. Gonzalez-Garcia, M. Maltoni, I. Martinez-Soler, and J. Salvado, “Updated Constraints on Non-Standard Interactions from Global Analysis of Oscillation Data,” JHEP 08 (2018) 180, arXiv:1805.04530 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2018

  25. [25]

    Neutrino Non-Standard Interactions: A Status Report,

    P. B. Dev et al., “Neutrino Non-Standard Interactions: A Status Report,” SciPost Phys.Proc. 2 (2019) 001, arXiv:1907.00991 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2019

  26. [26]

    Light sterile neutrinos

    S. Gariazzo, C. Giunti, M. Laveder, Y. F. Li, and E. M. Zavanin, “Light sterile neutrinos,” J.Phys.G 43 (2016) 033001, arXiv:1507.08204 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  27. [27]

    Updated Global 3+1 Analysis of Short-BaseLine Neutrino Oscillations

    S. Gariazzo, C. Giunti, M. Laveder, and Y. F. Li, “Updated Global 3+1 Analysis of Short-BaseLine Neutrino Oscillations,” JHEP 06 (2017) 135, arXiv:1703.00860 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  28. [28]

    Updated global analysis of neutrino oscillations in the presence of eV-scale sterile neutrinos

    M. Dentler, A. Hern´ andez-Cabezudo, J. Kopp, P. A. Machado, M. Maltoni, I. Martinez-Soler, and T. Schwetz, “Updated Global Analysis of Neutrino Oscillations in the Presence of eV-Scale Sterile Neutrinos,” JHEP 08 (2018) 010, arXiv:1803.10661 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  29. [29]

    Sterile Neutrinos or Flux Uncertainties? - Status of the Reactor Anti-Neutrino Anomaly

    M. Dentler, A. Hern´ andez-Cabezudo, J. Kopp, M. Maltoni, and T. Schwetz, “Sterile Neutrinos or Flux Uncertainties? - Status of the Reactor Anti-Neutrino Anomaly,” JHEP 11 (2017) 099, arXiv:1709.04294 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  30. [30]

    Model-Independent $\bar\nu_{e}$ Short-Baseline Oscillations from Reactor Spectral Ratios

    S. Gariazzo, C. Giunti, M. Laveder, and Y. F. Li, “Model-Independent ¯νe Short-Baseline Oscillations from Reactor Spectral Ratios,” Phys.Lett. B782 (2018) 13–21, arXiv:1801.06467 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  31. [31]

    Where Are We With Light Sterile Neutrinos?,

    A. Diaz, C. Arg¨ uelles, G. Collin, J. Conrad, and M. Shaevitz, “Where Are We With Light Sterile Neutrinos?,” Phys. Rept. 884 (2020) 1–59, arXiv:1906.00045 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2020

  32. [32]

    eV-scale Sterile Neutrinos,

    C. Giunti and T. Lasserre, “eV-scale Sterile Neutrinos,” Ann.Rev.Nucl.Part.Sci. 69 no. 1, (2019) 163–190, arXiv:1901.08330 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2019

  33. [33]

    Status of Light Sterile Neutrino Searches,

    S. B¨ oser, C. Buck, C. Giunti, J. Lesgourgues, L. Ludhova, S. Mertens, A. Schukraft, and M. Wurm, “Status of Light Sterile Neutrino Searches,” Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 111 (2020) 103736, arXiv:1906.01739 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2020

  34. [34]

    Measurement of the solar electron neutrino flux with the Homestake chlorine detector,

    B. Cleveland et al., “Measurement of the solar electron neutrino flux with the Homestake chlorine detector,” Astrophys.J. 496 (1998) 505–526

    work page 1998

  35. [35]

    Reanalysis of the GALLEX solar neutrino flux and source experiments

    F. Kaether, W. Hampel, G. Heusser, J. Kiko, and T. Kirsten, “Reanalysis of the GALLEX solar neutrino flux and source experiments,” Phys.Lett.B 685 (2010) 47–54, arXiv:1001.2731 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  36. [36]

    Measurement of the solar neutrino capture rate with gallium metal. III: Results for the 2002--2007 data-taking period

    SAGE Collaboration, J. N. Abdurashitov et al., “Measurement of the solar neutrino capture rate with gallium metal. III: Results for the 2002–2007 data-taking period,” Phys.Rev.C 80 (2009) 015807, arXiv:0901.2200 [nucl-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  37. [37]

    Precision measurement of the 7Be solar neutrino interaction rate in Borexino

    G. Bellini et al., “Precision measurement of the 7Be solar neutrino interaction rate in Borexino,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 (2011) 141302, arXiv:1104.1816 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  38. [38]

    Final results of Borexino Phase-I on low energy solar neutrino spectroscopy

    Borexino Collaboration, G. Bellini et al., “Final results of Borexino Phase-I on low energy solar neutrino spectroscopy,” Phys.Rev.D 89 (2014) 112007, arXiv:1308.0443 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  39. [39]

    Solar neutrino measurements in Super-Kamiokande-I

    Super-Kamiokande Collaboration, J. Hosaka et al., “Solar neutrino measurements in super-Kamiokande-I,” Phys.Rev.D 73 (2006) 112001, arXiv:hep-ex/0508053 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  40. [40]

    Solar neutrino measurements in Super-Kamiokande-II

    Super-Kamiokande Collaboration, J. Cravens et al., “Solar neutrino measurements in Super-Kamiokande-II,” Phys.Rev.D 78 (2008) 032002, arXiv:0803.4312 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  41. [41]

    Solar neutrino results in Super-Kamiokande-III

    Super-Kamiokande Collaboration, K. Abe et al., “Solar neutrino results in Super-Kamiokande-III,” Phys.Rev.D 83 (2011) 052010, arXiv:1010.0118 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  42. [42]

    PhD Thesis, University of Tokyo

    Y. Nakano, “PhD Thesis, University of Tokyo.” http://www-sk.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/sk/_pdf/articles/2016/doc_thesis_naknao.pdf, 2016. 30

    work page 2016

  43. [43]

    First detection of solar neutrinos from CNO cycle with Borexino,

    G. Ranucci, “First detection of solar neutrinos from CNO cycle with Borexino,” June, 2020. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4134014

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.4134014 2020

  44. [44]

    Recent results and future prospects from Super- Kamiokande,

    Y. Nakajima, “Recent results and future prospects from Super- Kamiokande,” June, 2020. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4134680

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.4134680 2020

  45. [45]

    Combined Analysis of all Three Phases of Solar Neutrino Data from the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory

    SNO Collaboration, B. Aharmim et al., “Combined Analysis of all Three Phases of Solar Neutrino Data from the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory,” Phys. Rev. C 88 (2013) 025501, arXiv:1109.0763 [nucl-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  46. [46]

    A new Generation of Standard Solar Models

    N. Vinyoles, A. M. Serenelli, F. L. Villante, S. Basu, J. Bergstrom, M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia, M. Maltoni, C. Pe˜ na-Garay, and N. Song, “A new Generation of Standard Solar Models,” Astrophys.J. 835 (2017) 202, arXiv:1611.09867 [astro-ph.SR]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  47. [47]

    Precision Measurement of Neutrino Oscillation Parameters with KamLAND

    KamLAND Collaboration, S. Abe et al., “Precision Measurement of Neutrino Oscillation Parameters with KamLAND,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 (2008) 221803, arXiv:0801.4589 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  48. [48]

    Constraints on $\theta_{13}$ from A Three-Flavor Oscillation Analysis of Reactor Antineutrinos at KamLAND

    KamLAND Collaboration, A. Gando et al., “Constraints on θ13 from A Three-Flavor Oscillation Analysis of Reactor Antineutrinos at KamLAND,” Phys.Rev.D 83 (2011) 052002, arXiv:1009.4771 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  49. [49]

    Reactor On-Off Antineutrino Measurement with KamLAND

    KamLAND Collaboration, A. Gando et al., “Reactor On-Off Antineutrino Measurement with KamLAND,” Phys. Rev. D 88 no. 3, (2013) 033001, arXiv:1303.4667 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  50. [50]

    Constraining nonstandard neutrino-quark interactions with solar, reactor and accelerator data

    F. Escrihuela, O. Miranda, M. Tortola, and J. W. F. Valle, “Constraining nonstandard neutrino-quark interactions with solar, reactor and accelerator data,” Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 105009, arXiv:0907.2630 [hep-ph] . [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 80, 129908 (2009)]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  51. [51]

    Generalized mass ordering degeneracy in neutrino oscillation experiments

    P. Coloma and T. Schwetz, “Generalized mass ordering degeneracy in neutrino oscillation experiments,” Phys.Rev. D 94 no. 5, (2016) 055005, arXiv:1604.05772 [hep-ph] . [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 95, 079903 (2017)]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  52. [52]

    Solar neutrinos and 1-3 leptonic mixing

    S. Goswami and A. Y. Smirnov, “Solar neutrinos and 1-3 leptonic mixing,” Phys. Rev. D 72 (2005) 053011, arXiv:hep-ph/0411359

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  53. [53]

    Measurement of Reactor Antineutrino Oscillation Amplitude and Frequency at RENO

    RENO Collaboration, G. Bak et al., “Measurement of Reactor Antineutrino Oscillation Amplitude and Frequency at RENO,” Phys.Rev.Lett. 121 (2018) 201801, arXiv:1806.00248 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  54. [54]

    Measurement of electron antineutrino oscillation with 1958 days of operation at Daya Bay

    Daya Bay Collaboration, D. Adey et al., “Measurement of electron antineutrino oscillation with 1958 days of operation at Daya Bay,” Phys.Rev.Lett. 121 (2018) 241805, arXiv:1809.02261 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1958

  55. [55]

    Another possible way to determine the Neutrino Mass Hierarchy

    H. Nunokawa, S. J. Parke, and R. Zukanovich Funchal, “Another possible way to determine the neutrino mass hierarchy,” Phys. Rev. D72 (2005) 013009, arXiv:hep-ph/0503283 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  56. [56]

    Constraint on the Solar dm 2 from combined Daya Bay & RENO data,

    J. Hernandez-Cabezudo, S. J. Parke, and S.-H. Seo, “Constraint on the Solar dm 2 from combined Daya Bay & RENO data,” Phys.Rev. D 100 (2019) 113008, arXiv:1905.09479 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2019

  57. [57]

    Spectral Measurement of the Electron Antineutrino Oscillation Amplitude and Frequency using 500 Live Days of RENO Data

    RENO Collaboration, S. Seo et al., “Spectral Measurement of the Electron Antineutrino Oscillation Amplitude and Frequency using 500 Live Days of RENO Data,” Phys.Rev. D 98 (2018) 012002, arXiv:1610.04326 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  58. [58]

    Yoo, “Reno,” June, 2020

    J. Yoo, “Reno,” June, 2020. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4123573

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.4123573 2020

  59. [59]

    Observation of Energy and Baseline Dependent Reactor Antineutrino Disappearance in the RENO Experiment

    RENO Collaboration, J. Choi et al., “Observation of Energy and Baseline Dependent Reactor Antineutrino Disappearance in the RENO Experiment,” Phys.Rev.Lett. 116 (2016) 211801, arXiv:1511.05849 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  60. [60]

    Improved Measurement of the Reactor Antineutrino Flux and Spectrum at Daya Bay

    Daya Bay Collaboration, F. P. An et al., “Improved Measurement of the Reactor Antineutrino Flux and Spectrum at Daya Bay,” Chin.Phys.C 41 (2017) 013002, arXiv:1607.05378 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  61. [61]

    Measurement of electron antineutrino oscillation based on 1230 days of operation of the Daya Bay experiment

    Daya Bay Collaboration, F. P. An et al., “Measurement of electron antineutrino oscillation based 31 on 1230 days of operation of the Daya Bay experiment,” Phys.Rev.D 95 (2017) 072006, arXiv:1610.04802 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  62. [62]

    Atmospheric neutrino oscillation analysis with external constraints in Super-Kamiokande I-IV

    Super-Kamiokande Collaboration, K. Abe et al., “Atmospheric neutrino oscillation analysis with external constraints in Super-Kamiokande I-IV,” Phys.Rev. D 97 (2018) 072001, arXiv:1710.09126 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  63. [63]

    Measurement of Atmospheric Neutrino Oscillations at 6-56 GeV with IceCube DeepCore

    IceCube Collaboration, M. G. Aartsen et al., “Measurement of Atmospheric Neutrino Oscillations at 6-56 GeV with IceCube DeepCore,” Phys.Rev.Lett. 120 (2018) 071801, arXiv:1707.07081 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  64. [64]

    Measurement of Atmospheric Tau Neutrino Appearance with IceCube DeepCore

    M. Aartsen et al., “Measurement of Atmospheric Tau Neutrino Appearance with IceCube DeepCore,” Phys.Rev. D 99 (2019) 032007, arXiv:1901.05366 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  65. [65]

    Atmospheric Neutrino Oscillation Analysis With Improved Event Reconstruction in Super-Kamiokande IV,

    Super-Kamiokande Collaboration, M. Jiang et al., “Atmospheric Neutrino Oscillation Analysis With Improved Event Reconstruction in Super-Kamiokande IV,” PTEP 2019 (2019) 053F01, arXiv:1901.03230 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2019

  66. [66]

    http://www-sk.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/sk/publications/data/sk.atm.data.release.tar.gz

    work page

  67. [67]

    Determining neutrino oscillation parameters from atmospheric muon neutrino disappearance with three years of IceCube DeepCore data

    IceCube Collaboration, M. G. Aartsen et al., “Determining neutrino oscillation parameters from atmospheric muon neutrino disappearance with three years of IceCube DeepCore data,” Phys.Rev.D 91 (2015) 072004, arXiv:1410.7227 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  68. [68]

    Three-year high-statistics neutrino oscillation samples

    IceCube Collaboration, “Three-year high-statistics neutrino oscillation samples.” https://icecube.wisc.edu/science/data/highstats_nuosc_3y, 2019

    work page 2019

  69. [69]

    New Oscillation Results from the NOvA Experiment,

    Alex Himmel, “New Oscillation Results from the NOvA Experiment,” Jul, 2020. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3959581

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.3959581 2020

  70. [70]

    Latest Neutrino Oscillation Results from T2K,

    Patrick Dunne, “Latest Neutrino Oscillation Results from T2K,” Jul, 2020. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3959558

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.3959558 2020

  71. [71]

    Combined analysis of $\nu_{\mu}$ disappearance and $\nu_{\mu} \rightarrow \nu_{e}$ appearance in MINOS using accelerator and atmospheric neutrinos

    MINOS Collaboration, P. Adamson et al., “Combined analysis of νµ disappearance and νµ→νe appearance in MINOS using accelerator and atmospheric neutrinos,” Phys.Rev.Lett. 112 (2014) 191801, arXiv:1403.0867 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  72. [72]

    Measurement of Neutrino Oscillation by the K2K Experiment

    K2K Collaboration, M. Ahn et al., “Measurement of Neutrino Oscillation by the K2K Experiment,” Phys.Rev.D 74 (2006) 072003, hep-ex/0606032

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  73. [73]

    Search for Electron Antineutrino Appearance in a Long-baseline Muon Antineutrino Beam,

    K. Abe et al., “Search for Electron Antineutrino Appearance in a Long-baseline Muon Antineutrino Beam,” Phys.Rev.Lett. 124 (2020) 161802, arXiv:1911.07283 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2020

  74. [74]

    Constraint on the Matter-Antimatter Symmetry-Violating Phase in Neutrino Oscillations,

    K. Abe et al., “Constraint on the Matter-Antimatter Symmetry-Violating Phase in Neutrino Oscillations,” Nature 580 (2020) 339–344, arXiv:1910.03887 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2020

  75. [75]

    Search for CP violation in Neutrino and Antineutrino Oscillations by the T2K experiment with $2.2\times10^{21}$ protons on target

    T2K Collaboration, K. Abe et al., “Search for CP Violation in Neutrino and Antineutrino Oscillations by the T2K Experiment with 2 .2× 1021 Protons on Target,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 no. 17, (2018) 171802, arXiv:1807.07891 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  76. [76]

    New constraints on oscillation parameters from $\nu_e$ appearance and $\nu_\mu$ disappearance in the NOvA experiment

    NOvA Collaboration, M. Acero et al., “New constraints on oscillation parameters from νe appearance and νµ disappearance in the NOvA experiment,” Phys.Rev. D 98 (2018) 032012, arXiv:1806.00096 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  77. [77]

    First measurement of neutrino oscillation parameters using neutrinos and antineutrinos by NOvA,

    NOvA Collaboration, M. Acero et al., “First measurement of neutrino oscillation parameters using neutrinos and antineutrinos by NOvA,” Phys.Rev.Lett. 123 (2019) 151803, arXiv:1906.04907 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2019

  78. [78]

    Simulation of long-baseline neutrino oscillation experiments with GLoBES

    P. Huber, M. Lindner, and W. Winter, “Simulation of long-baseline neutrino oscillation experiments with GLoBES (General Long Baseline Experiment Simulator),” Comput. Phys. Commun. 167 (2005) 195, arXiv:hep-ph/0407333 [hep-ph] . 32

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  79. [79]

    New features in the simulation of neutrino oscillation experiments with GLoBES 3.0

    P. Huber, J. Kopp, M. Lindner, M. Rolinec, and W. Winter, “New features in the simulation of neutrino oscillation experiments with GLoBES 3.0: General Long Baseline Experiment Simulator,” Comput. Phys. Commun. 177 (2007) 432–438, arXiv:hep-ph/0701187 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  80. [80]

    Measurement of Neutrino and Antineutrino Oscillations Using Beam and Atmospheric Data in MINOS

    MINOS Collaboration, P. Adamson et al., “Measurement of Neutrino and Antineutrino Oscillations Using Beam and Atmospheric Data in MINOS,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 no. 25, (2013) 251801, arXiv:1304.6335 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

Showing first 80 references.